(Confirmed Minutes) (Translation) Sai Kung District Council Traffic and Transport Committee Minutes of the Sixth Meeting in 2017

(Confirmed minutes) (Translation) Sai Kung District Council Traffic and Transport Committee Minutes of the Sixth Meeting in 2017

Date: 23 November 2017 (Thursday) Time: 9:30 a.m. Venue: Conference Room of the Sai Kung District Council

Present From To Mr. LAU Wai-cheung, Peter, MH (Chairman) 9:30 a.m. 5:40 p.m. Mr. CHONG Yuen-tung (Vice Chairman) 9:30 a.m. 5:40 p.m. Mr. AU Ning-fat, Alfred, MH 9:30 a.m. 5:40 p.m. Mr. CHAN Kai-wai 9:30 a.m. 5:40 p.m. Mr. CHAN Pok-chi, Jonathan 9:30 a.m. 5:40 p.m. Mr. CHAU Yin-ming, Francis, BBS, MH 9:30 a.m. 5:40 p.m. Mr. CHEUNG Mei-hung 9:30 a.m. 5:40 p.m. Mr. CHUNG Kam-lun 9:30 a.m. 5:40 p.m. Mr. FAN Kwok-wai, Gary 9:30 a.m. 5:20 p.m. Ms. FONG Kwok-shan, Christine 9:30 a.m. 4:40 p.m. Mr. HIEW Moo-siew 9:30 a.m. 5:40 p.m. Mr. HO Man-kit, Raymond 11:45 a.m. 5:40 p.m. Mr. KAN Siu-kei 9:35 a.m. 12:45 p.m. Mr. LAI Ming-chak 9:30 a.m. 5:40 p.m. Mr. LAM Siu-chung, Frankie 9:30 a.m. 5:40 p.m. Mr. LEUNG Li 9:30 a.m. 5:40 p.m. Mr. LI Ka-leung, Philip 9:30 a.m. 5:40 p.m. Mr. LING Man-hoi, BBS, MH 9:30 a.m. 5:40 p.m. Mr. LUI Man-kwong 9:30 a.m. 5:30 p.m. Mr. LUK Ping-choi 9:30 a.m. 12:31 p.m. Mr. TAM Lanny, Stanley, MH 9:45 a.m. 5:20 p.m. Mr. TSE Ching-fung 9:30 a.m. 3:56 p.m. Mr. WAN Kai-ming 9:30 a.m. 5:40 p.m. Mr. WAN Yuet-cheung, BBS, MH, JP 9:30 a.m. 5:40 p.m. Mr. YAU Yuk-lun 9:30 a.m. 5:40 p.m. Executive Officer (District Council) 2, Miss TANG Carmen (Secretary) Sai Kung District Office

In Attendance Mr. CHU Chi-ho, Marco Assistant District Officer (Sai Kung)2, Sai Kung District Office Senior Executive Officer (District Council), Sai Kung District Miss LAU Tang, Moira Office Mr. LO Ka-kit, Sunny Liaison Officer In-charge (Tseung Kwan O) South, Sai Kung 1

District Office Mr. CHU Cheuk-king Senior Transport Officer/Sai Kung, Transport Department Mr. HU Yue-ming, Alan Engineer/Pedestrian Improvements, Transport Department Ms. LAW Wai-ka, Rica Engineer/Sai Kung, Transport Department Mr. WOO Kwong-ming Engineer/Special Duties 1, Transport Department Mr. NG Kin-fung District Engineer/Tseung Kwan O, Highways Department Mr. TSE Leung-yau District Engineer/Sai Kung, Highways Department OC District Traffic Team (Tseung Kwan O), Hong Kong Police Mr. CHU Chi-wai Force Mr. SHEK Chi-man Sub-unit Commander (Operations Support) (Sai Kung Division), Hong Kong Police Force

Representatives of Other Government Departments and Organisations Senior Engineer/Project Management (5), Water Supplies Mr. LAU Chi-ming Department Engineer/Project Management (13), Water Supplies Mr. KWOK Ka-shing Department Mr. LAU Wai, Tony Project Manager, Black & Veatch Hong Kong Limited For agenda item (II) Mr. FU Ka-chun, Principal Engineer, Black & Veatch Hong Kong Limited Dickson Mr. LUI Joel Senior Engineer, Black & Veatch Hong Kong Limited Mr. TSE Tsz-kin, Keith Engineer, Black & Veatch Hong Kong Limited Ms. CHUNG Pui-yi, Senior Public Affairs Officer, Citybus Limited/ Penny New World First Bus Services Limited For agenda Mr. MAK Shing-pong, Assistant Manager (Operations), Kowloon Motor Bus items (IV), Douglas Company (1933) Limited (V) and (VII) Ms. WONG Po-wan, Assistant Manager (Planning and Development), Kowloon Christine Motor Bus Company (1933) Limited Assistant Public Relations Manager – External Affairs, MTR Ms. SO Yuk-yin, Rysta For agenda Corporation Limited item (X)

Welcome Remarks

The Chairman welcomed all Members and representatives of government departments and organisations to the sixth meeting of the Traffic and Transport Committee (TTC) in 2017.

2. The Chairman said that no application for absence from meeting was submitted to the Secretariat. In addition, a total of nine motions, two questions and two referred motions had been received for this meeting.

I. Confirmation of Minutes of the Fifth Meeting of TTC in 2017

3. There being no amendment from Members, the Chairman declared that the minutes of the fifth meeting of TTC in 2017 were confirmed.

II. Implementation of Water Intelligent Network (WIN), Stage 2 (Works within Sai Kung District) (SKDC(TTC) No. 280/17)

4. The Chairman welcomed the representatives of the Water Supplies Department (WSD) and the consultant to the Sai Kung District Council (SKDC), including:

 Mr. LAU Chi-ming, Senior Engineer/Project Management (5), WSD  Mr. KWOK Ka-shing, Engineer/Project Management (13), WSD  Mr. Tony LAU, Project Manager, Black & Veatch Hong Kong Limited (B&V)  Mr. Dickson FU, Principal Engineer, B&V  Mr. Joel LUI, Senior Engineer, B&V  Mr. Keith TSE, Engineer, B&V

5. Mr. Dickson FU, Principal Project Engineer of B&V, introduced the works based on the Presentation Slides.

6. Members’ views and enquiries as well as the response from Mr. Tony LAU, Project Manager of B&V were as follows:

Members’ views and enquiries B&V’s response Overall views  Members welcomed the captioned works.

Suspension of water supply  As water suspension might be  As water suspension might affect required during the works period, residents, the consultant would coordinate Members requested that the works be with the District Councillors and carried out overnight in order to stakeholders concerned on the period of minimise the impact on residents. In water suspension about three months the past, the replacement of salt water before commencement of water main mains was carried out at day time on connection works, and would cope with Saturdays due to the new requirement the requests of stakeholders as far as on noise control imposed by the practicable. If the District Councillor of Environmental Protection Department the respective constituency and the (EPD). Consequently, the permit for residents considered it necessary and night-time works could not be beneficial to the stakeholders to suspend obtained. Members enquired water supply at night time, the resident site whether the captioned project would staff would make co-ordination efforts as be subject to the above requirement far as possible. and requested WSD to co-ordinate  Regarding the question on the application with EPD. of Construction Noise Permit, resident site  Members enquired about the staff would promptly study with EPD the frequency of water suspensions during feasibility of carrying out night-time the works period. works and the necessary preparatory work  District-wide water main replacement as soon as possible upon commencement works had been carried out early this of works, so as to take a proactive year. Members suggested WSD approach in seeking approval from EPD.

Members’ views and enquiries B&V’s response arrange the works for flushing water  During the installation of monitors, or fresh water mains together to sensors and easing gears and after reduce the impact of water reprovisioning of water mains, water suspension. suspension might be required. As the  Members enquired whether there were works for installing the system for district multiple water sources in the water metering areas and pressure management supply network of Sai Kung District area mainly affected the major supply and suggested making arrangement to zones of fresh water service reservoirs in supply fresh water to the affected Kwun Tong District, the impact on that residents from another water source. district would be relatively significant. The works for the reprovisioning of water mains would mostly affect residents in the vicinity of the site.  If there were multiple water sources in the affected water supply area, shifting the water sources could alleviate the impact on the affected areas. However, water suspension at some locations was unavoidable during the connection works. Therefore, an independent and detailed analysis should be carried out at each location. Upon receipt of the works programme from the contractor, resident site staff would explain the details to the District Councillor of the respective constituency in a timely manner.

Scope of works  Members enquired about the housing  The captioned works were expected to estates that were expected to be commence in 2018. Upon receipt of the affected by water suspension, in works programme from the contractor, particular due to the works at Sheung resident site staff would carry out further Ning Playground and Hong Kong site investigation before commencement Velodrome Park. of works to confirm the scope of works  According to the consultation paper, and affected areas in order to conduct the captioned works would mainly be consultation on the arrangements of works carried out at four locations, but the and water suspension as well as to water main works might affect the coordinate with the District Councillor of whole water supply system. In the the respective constituency and the past, water main bursts had affected affected consumers. all parts of Tseung Kwan O, and  The scope of works shown in the therefore Members requested that the Presentation Slides served as a reference affected housing estates should be for indicating the areas in which the works informed as soon as possible to avoid would be conducted. For the boundary omission in future. of works sites, reference could be made to  The scope of works stated in the the diagrams in the consultation paper. Presentation Slides included Pak  As the other works for district metering Kong and Pak Sha Wan, but the areas or water pressure management areas consultation paper did not indicate already covered some sections of Wan Po

Members’ views and enquiries B&V’s response any works to be carried out near the Road, the captioned works would not above areas. Members hoped that cover Wan Po Road. Besides, other clarification could be made on the waterworks such as setting up district scope of works. metering areas and pressure management  There were repeated cases of water areas were underway or had been main leakage at Wan Po Road in the completed in Tseung Kwan O and Sai past, but the scope of the captioned Kung, which already covered the major works did not include Wan Po Road. users of water supply in Sai Kung District. Members asked whether improvement  The Programme of Replacement and works would be required there, if not, Rehabilitation of Water Mains had been the reasons for that. substantially completed in late 2015 in  Apart from the proposed scope of which most of the water mains with high works, Members asked whether the risks of bursts or leakage had been reprovisioning of water mains with replaced. The objective of the captioned damage or leakage in the district was works was for the reprovisioning of the possible in the light of the suggestions remaining mains with high risks to further of local personalities. improve the water supply network.

Works arrangement  For the reprovisioning of water mains  As large-scale excavation would be at Po Shun Road near Sheung Ning required for laying water mains with large Playground and Hong Kong diameters, it would have a certain degree Velodrome Park, members requested of environmental impact. Therefore, to adopt methods which would have a resident site staff would consider adopting relatively slight traffic impact, for trenchless technology for rehabilitation of example, the trenchless technology. water mains when carrying out the works However, some members said that at Po Shun Road near Sheung Ning according to the plan, the works at Po Playground and Hong Kong Velodrome Shun Road near Sheung Ning Park. Playground and Hong Kong  There were different restrictions on Velodrome Park would be carried out different types of works. For large-scale within the park area instead of on the works or those involving long water roads, which would not bring about a mains, the facilities above and huge traffic impact. underground or other obstacles would give  In some past projects, the validity rise to unforeseeable factors affecting the period of the Excavation Permit was works period. As the captioned works much longer than the actual time mainly involved the construction of required for carrying out the works. chambers or the reprovisioning of water Even during the non-construction mains and the scope of each works item period, roads would still be enclosed was small with locations closely causing a certain degree of impacts on connected together, the chance of residents. Thus, Members requested encountering the above obstacles was the relevant parties to ensure that the relatively slim. Even if encountering the works be completed efficiently. above obstacles, they could still be overcome as soon as possible. Furthermore, resident site staff would strictly monitor the works progress to avoid works delay or idling as well as to avoid occupation of road surface for a 5

Members’ views and enquiries B&V’s response long period of time as far as practicable.

Works impact  While the captioned works included  Only a small portion of the captioned the reprovisioning of water mains at works would be carried out at Hiram’s Hiram’s Highway near Wo Mei, the Highway. It was thus unlikely that the traffic flow at Hiram’s Highway traffic would be significantly affected. would certainly be affected as the  The reprovisioning of water mains aimed Hiram’s Highway Improvement at replacing water mains with high risks. Project Stage 1 was underway. The completion of such works would in Members requested studying the fact reduce the risks of water main bursts feasibility of carrying out the two or leaks. works items concurrently. In  Microtunneling or rehabilitation would be addition, there was frequent traffic considered for the works spanning some congestion at Hiram’s Highway on major trunk roads such as Tseung Kwan O holidays and during the peak hours in Tunnel Road in order to minimise the day time. Members requested traffic impact. carrying out the works at night time.  Members asked whether the reprovisioning of water mains would significantly increase the likelihood of water main issues (such as water main bursts) disrupting traffic.  Members were aware that the reprovisioning of water mains would span Hiram’s Highway and Tseung Kwan O Tunnel Road respectively and requested the provision of more plans and information, such as the necessity of road closure and traffic impact.

Works cost  Members asked about the total works  The preliminary cost of works was about cost and of which the portion incurred $350 million, of which the works costs for in the works in Sai Kung District. the construction of chambers and  Members enquired whether the works reprovisioning of water mains in Sai Kung had been granted funding by the District were $7 million and $40 million Legislative Council. respectively.

Other views  Since the locations of some works would have district-wide impact, district consultation should be made. In addition, Members requested that information be submitted to the Secretariat before works commencement for Members to keep abreast of the latest situation of the 6

Members’ views and enquiries B&V’s response works.  Water main bursts near Pak Sha Wan Kwun Yam Temple had repeatedly occurred, Members asked WSD to take note of and follow up the issue.

7. The Chairman concluded that there was no objection from Members, and requested WSD and the consultant to follow up on Members’ views, which mainly included: (1) monitoring the contractor to avoid works delay and minimise the impact on road users; (2) carrying out night-time works as far as practicable in order not to affect the public and traffic condition in the district, in particular busy roads such as Hiram’s Highway; and (3) maintaining close liaison with the District Councillor and local personalities of the affected areas to inform them of water suspension periods. If there was any progress, the information should be submitted to the Secretariat for timely release to Members.

III. Next Phase of the “Universal Accessibility” Programme Request for including the works on installing a lift for the footbridge at Tsui Lam Estate in the “Universal Accessibility” Programme (Paragraphs 7 to 8 of the minutes of last meeting)

8. Some Members enquired whether the Highways Department (HyD) had engaged a consultant to follow up the works under the captioned programme, and whether HyD representatives in attendance would report the works progress to TTC on a regular basis.

9. Mr. TSE Leung-yau, District Engineer/Sai Kung of HyD responded that as the Major Works Project Management Office of HyD would be responsible for the captioned programme, the works progress could not be reported to TTC on a regular basis. Any enquiries or views from Members on the captioned programme would be forwarded to the relevant staff by the HyD representatives in attendance.

10. The Chairman said that it would take time for HyD and the consultant to carry out feasibility studies on the three projects for the next phase, HyD would report to TTC upon completion of studies. With Members’ consent, the Chairman agreed to delete the above item.

IV. Request the Transport Department to cancel the trial period of the modified routing of route no. 692P, and step up the publicity Extend the routing of route no. 692P to Hang Hau to increase patronage, request that the original frequency and arrival time of route no. 692P be maintained for Tseung Kwan O South, and to conduct a review on and make improvement to the routing after the 3-month trial run Strongly request the New World First Bus Services Limited to revise the proposal for extending the routing of certain departures of route no. N796 to Wan Po Road, and request for extending the overnight service to Oscar by the Sea, LOHAS Park and the Beaumount Request to resume the service of route no. 692, to maintain the service frequency of route no. 692P during rush hours and to have route no. 690 running via Hang Hau and Tseung Kwan O South during non-rush hours

(Paragraphs 9 to 12 of the minutes of last meeting)

11. The Chairman welcomed Ms. Christine WONG, Assistant Manager (Planning and Development) of the Kowloon Motor Bus Company (1933) Limited (KMB), who succeeded Mr. LAI Ka Long, Luka that had been transferred out.

12. With Members’ consent, the Chairman agreed deleting the item “Strongly request the New World First Bus Services Limited to revise the proposal for extending the routing of certain departures of route no. N796 to Wan Po Road, and request for extending the overnight service to Oscar by the Sea, LOHAS Park and the Beaumount”. As the extension of route no. 692P to Hang Hau was under trial run, it was suggested that the other three items would be retained.

V. Subsidising the Installation of Seats and Real-time Bus Arrival Information Display Panels at Covered Bus Stops by Franchised Bus Companies Request to construct bus stop shelter at the bus stop of route no. 798 near Leung Kit Wah Primary School at Po Fung Road of Tseung Kwan O to provide awaiting passengers with a shelter from the sun or rain Enquire about the arrangement and works progress of the Kowloon Motor Bus Company’s proposal to install display panel that shows the estimated arrival times of buses at the Hong Sing Garden station (towards Kowloon) on Po Lam Road North (Paragraphs 13 to 17 of the minutes of last meeting)

13. Mr. CHU Cheuk-king, Senior Transport Officer/Sai Kung of Transport Department (TD) reported that the consultation exercise for constructing a shelter at the bus stop near Leung Kit Wah Primary School had commenced in October this year. TD had contacted the Sai Kung District Office (SKDO) and other organisations to assist in carrying out district consultation.

14. Members enquired about the deadline for public consultation and the time of works commencement if no objection was received. In addition, Members enquired about the progress of power connection at the bus stop of Hong Sing Garden at Po Lam Road North. As the stop was located on a slope, residents (in particular the elderly) hoped that real-time bus arrival information display panels could be installed as soon as possible.

15. Mr. CHU Cheuk-king of TD responded that the public consultation on the construction of shelters at the bus stop near Leung Kit Wah Primary School would end in late November. Apart from public consultation, TD was also required to carry out consultation on the technical aspect of the works with the relevant departments to understand whether there were any underground facilities. The consultation exercise was still underway and TD would handle the application as soon as possible.

16. Mr. Douglas MAK, Assistant Manager (Operations) of KMB reported that applications were being made with regard to the Excavation Permit for the works at the bus stop of Hong Sing Garden at Po Lam Road North and for the supply of electricity by the power company. It was expected that connection of electricity supply would be completed in the first quarter of 2018, followed by the installation of bus arrival information display panels.

17. The Chairman agreed to retain the above issue.

VI. Major changes in public transportation services launched in Sai Kung district from 1 September 2017 to 31 October 2017 (Paragraphs 18 to 26 of the minutes of last meeting) (SKDC(TTC) Paper Nos. 281/17 and 330/17)

18. Members noted the discussion papers and the written reply from TD.

19. Members’ views were as follows:

796X  After route no. 796X was extended to Tseung Kwan O Industrial Estate and diverted to run via Chi Shin Street, there were lost trips frequently. With the new routing, the Beaumount stop (departure) and the Capitol/Le Prestige stop (return) were cancelled, which posed safety hazard to passengers who had to cross the bustling Wan Po Road to travel between their home and the bus stop. It was hoped that the original stops could be reinstated. Furthermore, Members asked TD to provide the changes in patronage after the re-routing for reference. (Note: Please also refer to paragraphs 76 to 81.)

NA29  Members enquired about the passenger loading and changes in patronage of route no. NA29 (airport bound) after increasing the frequency to two departures every day.

20. Mr. CHU Cheuk-king of TD responded that TD would provide the patronage figures of route no. NA29 after the meeting.

VII. Items related to bus service

(A) Discussion and Matters Arising

(1) Progress on the follow up of bus services by the Transport Department in response to the 5th meeting of the Traffic and Transport Committee in 2017 (Paragraph 27 of the minutes of last meeting) (SKDC(TTC) Paper No. 282/17)

21. Members noted the paper.

(2) Request the Transport Department to look into a solution to cater for the needs of those living in Serenity Place, Verbena Heights and Finery Park after adjusting the routing of route no. E22A (Paragraphs 28 to 30 of the minutes of last meeting)

22. Mr. CHU Cheuk-king of TD reported that TD had recently identified a new location at Po Hong Road to provide a new bus stop and believed that the location was suitable as passengers would not need to cross the cycle track to go to the bus stop, but it required partial removal of the planters. TD would provide the relevant information (including the new location) to Members via the Secretariat later and Members were welcome to make comments.

23. Members’ views were as follows: 9

 Members were pleased to know that the new proposal of TD did not require the provision of bus bay which would have minimal impact on the surrounding trees.  Members supported the new proposal of TD and hoped that TD could follow up proactively to take forward the proposal as soon as possible.

24. The Chairman agreed to retain the above item.

(3) Request the Government to promptly relocate the bus stop of route no. E22A at the Hong Kong Design Institute to the Tiu Keng Leng Public Transport Interchange (Paragraphs 19, 31 to 34 of the minutes of last meeting)

25. Mr. CHU Cheuk-king of TD said that TD was exploring with the bus company the possibility of adopting clockwise direction for routing of both bound journeys in Tseung Kwan O. If there was further information, TD would report to TTC.

26. As a motion was relevant to the above item, there being no objection from Members, the Chairman declared that the two items would be discussed together.

Request the KMB to make arrangement for bus route no. 296D to run via Tiu Keng Leng and add an en route stop there. Request the route no. E22A of the Citybus to relocate the bus stop on the return trip to the Tiu Keng Leng Public Transport Interchange (SKDC(TTC) Paper Nos. 283/17 and 320/17)

27. The Chairman said that the motion was moved by Mr. CHAN Kai-wai and seconded by Ms. Christine FONG and Mr. CHEUNG Mei-hung.

28. Members noted the written reply from KMB.

29. Mr. CHU Cheuk-king of TD supplemented that TD noted Members’ views. KMB route no. 296D running between Sheung Tak and Kowloon Station had long been one of the major bus services for residents of Sheung Tak Estate and Kwong Ming Court to travel to and from Kwun Tong, Jordan and Tsim Sha Tsui as the two estates were relatively far from the MTR station. On the other hand, the MTR network already covered most of the new town areas in Tseung Kwan O, including Tiu Keng Leng, Tseung Kwan O and LOHAS Park. Together with a number of routes operated by the New World First Bus Services Limited (NWFB) such as route nos. 796P and 796X, the existing public transport network to and from Tseung Kwan O, Tiu Keng Leng, Jordan and Tsim Sha Tsui were quite diversified. If route no. 296D was to be re-routed, it would affect the journey time and cause inconvenience to passengers. In this regard, TD had no plan to divert the routing of route no. 296D to Tiu Keng Leng for the time being, but TD would closely monitor the population growth in the district and the demand for MTR and the relevant bus services. TD had recently carried out a survey on the number of passengers taking route nos. 796P and 796X in Tiu Keng Leng and found that the current bus frequency could largely meet the service demand. As route no. 796P also ran via the new development area at Tseung Kwan O South, in particular the new housing estates in the vicinity of Chi Shin Street. TD would actively study with the bus company on whether it was necessary to enhance the service of route no. 796P.

30. Some Members were dissatisfied that TD refused to implement the proposal on the grounds of route-overlapping. A number of routes under the series of bus route no. 796 also overlapped as they would run via Sheung Tak Estate. Members considered that TD should apply the same standard. Furthermore, it had been observed that the patronage of route no. 296D had been decreasing, and it was worried that the route would be cancelled due to insufficient patronage. In this connection, Members requested TD and the bus company to provide the patronage figures of route no. 296D for the past few years for TTC to understand whether the route still had patronage capacity.

31. Mr. CHU Cheuk-king of TD responded that TD always aspired to provide at least one means of public transport in every area for travelling to and from the urban area. As Sheung Tak Estate and Kwong Ming Court were far from the MTR station, TD hoped to provide adequate bus services for residents there to widen their choices. Similarly, residents in Tiu Keng Leng, Tseung Kwan O Plaza and Popcorn could take MTR and the series of bus route no. 796. In sum, two or more means of public transport were available in each of the above residential areas. TD hoped to cater for the needs of people from the perspectives of geographical location and choice of routes. TD would provide the information requested by Members after the meeting.

32. There being no amendment or objection from Members, the Chairman declared that the motion was endorsed and requested TD, KMB and Citybus Limited (Citybus) to follow up Members’ views and provide the patronage figures of route no. 296D for the past few years. The Chairman agreed to retain item (3).

(4) Suggest extending the operating hours at night time of the cross-boundary coaches from Shenzhen Bay Port to Tiu Keng Leng Request the cross-boundary coaches to and from Tseung Kwan O and Shenzhen Bay Port to set up pick-up/set-down points at Hong Sing Garden, King Ming Court and Tsui Lam Estate (Paragraphs 35 to 37 of the minutes of last meeting)

33. As a motion was related to the above item, there being no objection from Members, the Chairman declared that the two items would be discussed together.

Request the Government to look into providing cross-boundary coach service in the District that run via the new Liantang/Heung Yuen Wai Boundary Control Point (SKDC(TTC) Paper No. 284/17)

34. The Chairman said that the motion was moved by Mr. Raymond HO and seconded by Mr. Frankie LAM.

35. Mr. CHU Cheuk-king of TD responded that Liantang/Heung Yuen Wai Boundary Control Point and Shenzhen Bay Port were the major land-based crossings in Hong Kong for facilitating land transport services including cross-boundary coach services. The pick-up/drop-off points of cross-boundary coaches were set up in Hong Kong by the operators in the light of market demand and subject to the approval of TD. In assessing applications from operators, TD would take into account various factors, including the degree of convenience of the suggested route and pick-up/drop-off points to passengers, ancillary facilities, road safety, traffic conditions, etc. Members had earlier reflected to TD the request for the provision of additional

stop at Tseung Kwan O Station and extension of service hours of the cross-boundary coach routes at Shenzhen Bay Port, but TD had not yet received any proposal from the operator. TD and the operator would closely monitor patronage demand and make suitable adjustment when necessary. Upon receipt of the application from the operator, TD would process the application according to the established procedures. As regards Members’ proposal for enhancing cross-boundary coach services in the district after the commissioning of Liantang-Heung Yuen Wai Boundary Control Point, TD had reflected the views to the cross-boundary coach trade. If any operator intended to provide new coach service to and from Liantang-Heung Yuen Wai Boundary Control Point at the above location or provide an additional stop for the existing service, TD would process the application according to the established procedures.

36. Some Members said that residents living uphill had to take cross-boundary coach at the pick-up/drop-off point of Tiu Keng Leng or East Point City while other travellers would take route no. 798 to Sha Tin MTR station to take the East Rail Line. In view of this, Members requested TD to provide cross-boundary coach pick-up/drop-off points in the area near Hong Sing Garden and Tsui Lam Estate. Furthermore, Members also requested TD to provide more cross-boundary coach routes in Tseung Kwan O as its population already exceeded 400 000.

37. There being no amendment or objection from Members, the Chairman declared that the motion was endorsed and requested TD to follow up Members’ views. With Members’ consent, item (4) was deleted.

(5) Request the Government to operate a bus route to and from Tseung Kwan O and the bus-bus Interchange on Tuen Mun Road, and provide interchange concessions (Paragraphs 38 to 40 of the minutes of last meeting)

38. Members said that the captioned proposal was not only the request of residents in Sai Kung but also that of residents in Tuen Mun. Members had collected signatures at Tuen Mun Road bus-bus interchange and Tseung Kwan O. The signatures would be passed to TD in the hope that TD could proactively follow up and consider the proposal. Moreover, Members hoped that TD could consider the proposals for different routes previously raised by TTC when mapping out the Bus Route Planning Programme for the coming year.

39. The Chairman agreed to retain the above item.

(6) Request for increasing the frequencies of airport bus routes (e.g. A29), and extending the services to LOHAS Park, the Beaumount and Oscar by the Sea Request for improving the airport bus services in Tseung Kwan O South (Paragraphs 41 to 43 and 46 to 49 of the minutes of last meeting) (SKDC(TTC) Paper No. 330/17)

40. Members noted the written reply from TD.

41. Members’ views were as follows:

 According to SKDC(TTC) Paper No. 282/17, the Citybus planned to increase the frequency of route no. A29. Other than increasing the frequency, the extension of the route to LOHAS Park, the Beaumount and Oscar by the Sea was also raised under the captioned

item.  In view of the growing population in LOHAS Park area, there was a considerable demand for airport and overnight bus services which should be addressed without delay. TD and the bus company had earlier said that they would consider extending the airport bus route to LOHAS Park area in 2018 on account of the population growth. In this regard, Members asked about the latest progress. They also suggested retaining the above item and writing to the bus company to urge for early implementation of the proposal.  For route no. A29 (airport bound), three bus stops would be provided at Kwun Tong Road and its service frequency would be increased to a headway of 20 minutes during peak hours, which was welcomed by members of the public. Nonetheless, the public was worried about the increase in journey time because of traffic congestion at Kwun Tong Road. Some Members had made observations at Tsun Yip Lane bus stop during evening peak hours and found that the bus stop of route nos. A22 and E22A was close to the bus stop of the routes to Yuen Long and Tuen Mun. As there were quite a number of passengers waiting for buses to Yuen Long and Tuen Mun, the buses for route nos. A22 and E22A could only pull over after the buses finished picking up passengers. To this end, Members hoped that in making service adjustments in future, TD and the bus company could consider factors like traffic congestion, impact on journey time and the number of passengers who could benefit from the service adjustment.  There was no plan to implement section fare arrangement for route no. A29 at Tsun Yip Lane bus stop. As the fare was higher than that of route no. A22 at the same stop, Members questioned its attractiveness and suggested the bus company take note of and follow up the issue.  Some residents had reflected that the first departure of route no. A29 at 5:15 a.m. from Po Lam could not meet the demand of passengers taking early morning flights. Passengers could only pay higher fare to take route no. NA29 which had a departure at 5:05 a.m. It was suggested that the first departure of route no. A29 be advanced to 5:05 a.m.  There were various airport bus routes in Kowloon, but residents in Tseung Kwan O had few choices. Adding to that, the proposed provision of bus stops for route no. A29 at Kwun Tong Road would bring no benefit but harm to residents in Tseung Kwan O.  The re-routing of route no. 796X had a great impact on residents of LOHAS Park, but the bus company had not yet provided any alternative route so far.

42. Ms. Penny CHUNG, Senior Public Affairs Officer, Citybus Limited/New World First Bus Services Limited (Citybus/NWFB) responded that the company issued a customer notice to inform the public about service enhancement of route no. A29. The service of route no. A29 would be enhanced from a headway of 30 minutes to a headway of 20 minutes for some trips with effect from 27 November. The company noted the concerns and views of Members on the new bus stops at Kwun Tong Road for route no. A29 (airport bound). The impact of the new bus stops on the journey time would depend on the number of passengers picked up/dropped off and the road traffic condition. As Members were worried that it would take time for buses to stop at Kwun Tong Road at evening peaks, the bus company would closely monitor the situation after the new bus stops were provided, and co-ordinate with TD and other bus companies about the bus stop locations when necessary. Furthermore, the company had been keeping in view the population growth of LOHAS Park and Tseung Kwan O South, and noted residents’ request relating to airport bus service. Although a proposal with specific details could not be provided for the time being, the bus company would continue to take note of population growth in the district.

43. The Chairman agreed to retain the above item one more time.

(7) Suggest route no. 93K to run via Tai Kok Tsui, and conducting extensive local consultation to improve the routing (Paragraphs 44 to 45 of the minutes of last meeting)

44. Some Members hoped that TD could consider the suggestions for route nos. 93A, 93K, 95 and 95M previously raised by TTC when mapping out the Bus Route Planning Programme for the coming year. In addition, Members expressed dissatisfaction about TD refusing to implement the proposals for re-routing on the grounds that interchange routes were available, and suggested that only direct routes could provide convenience to passengers.

45. The Chairman agreed to retain the above item.

(8) Suggest extending the routing of route no. 93A to Kai Tak Cruise Terminal, and conducting extensive local consultation to improve the routing (Paragraphs 50 to 52 of the minutes of last meeting)

46. The Chairman agreed to retain the above item.

(9) Request for providing shuttle bus service between the Wan Po area and the shopping mall/market of Metro City Request the Transport Department to provide transport options that facilitate residents to go to buy food during the renovation of the Hau Tak Market (Paragraphs 60 to 61 and 107 to 111 of the minutes of last meeting)

47. Members said that the captioned motion was moved before the renovation of Hau Tak Market in the hope of providing suitable alternative transport options to residents, such as shuttle bus, concessions for short-haul journey, etc. However, the issue had been held back and the renovation of Hau Tak Market was already close to completion. Members expressed disappointment over the issue.

48. With Members’ consent, the Chairman agreed to delete the above item.

(10) Suggest extending the routing of route no. 95 to China Hong Kong City Terminus, and conducting extensive local consultation to improve the routing (Paragraphs 62 to 66 of the minutes of last meeting)

49. The Chairman agreed to retain the above item.

(11) Suggest increasing the frequency of bus route no. 98P to improve the service and provide convenience to residents (Paragraphs 67 to 72 of the minutes of last meeting) (SKDC(TTC) Paper No. 330/17)

50. Members noted the written reply from TD.

51. Members’ views were as follows:

 Residents living uphill mainly took buses and used residents’ service shuttles for travelling to and from Tsim Sha Tsui. For the captioned route, there were only two departures every day running via Tseung Kwan O Tunnel where traffic congestion frequently occurred. Even if passengers took the first departure at 7:50 a.m., they were unable to arrive at their destination on time. Members requested TD and the bus company to provide another departure at 7:30 a.m. or earlier.  TD and the bus company had considered increasing the frequency of the captioned route in the Bus Route Planning Programme for this year. Members requested that the proposal be implemented as soon as possible.

52. Mr. CHU Cheuk-king of TD responded that TD noted Members’ views on advancing the time for the first departure. As the overall service of the captioned route could meet the demand, TD would continue to study the issue with the bus company.

53. The Chairman agreed to retain the above item.

(12) Suggest the NWFB to provide special departures of route no. 797M during rush hours to run via Tiu Keng Leng (Paragraphs 19, 73 to 77 of the minutes of last meeting)

54. With Members’ consent, the Chairman agreed to delete the above item.

(13) Request the Citybus to increase the number of outlets for selling Cityflyer Pre-paid Return Tickets, and to allow the ticket holders to take the buses of the “NA” routes after paying the difference between the fares (Paragraphs 78 to 82 of the minutes of last meeting) (SKDC(TTC) Paper No. 330/17)

55. Members noted the written reply from TD.

56. Ms. Penny CHUNG of Citybus/NWFB reported that concerning the suggestion for allowing ticket holders of Cityflyer Pre-paid Return Tickets to take buses of the “NA” routes after paying the difference between the fares, the bus company and TD were exploring its feasibility and specific arrangements. The bus company would report to TTC if there were updates of the issue.

57. The Chairman agreed to retain the above item one more time.

(14) Request for exploring the possibility of adding a bus stop at Lohas Park Road/Wan Po Road (near Hemera) to provide convenience to the residents of Hemera (Paragraphs 83 to 87 of the minutes of last meeting) (SKDC(TTC) Paper No. 330/17)

58. Members noted the written reply from TD.

59. With Members’ consent, the Chairman agreed to delete the above item.

(15) Request the bus companies to offer fare concessions for all students (Paragraphs 88 and 92 of the minutes of last meeting) 15

60. With Members’ consent, the Chairman agreed to delete the above item.

(B) The 6 Motions presented by Members (Bus)

(1) Request the KMB to make arrangement for bus route no. 296D to run via Tiu Keng Leng and add an en route stop there. Request the route no. E22A of the Citybus to relocate the bus stop on the return trip to the Tiu Keng Leng Public Transport Interchange (SKDC(TTC) Paper Nos. 283/17 and 268/17) (2) Request the Government to look into providing cross-boundary coach service in the District that run via the new Liantang/Heung Yuen Wai Boundary Control Point (SKDC(TTC) Paper No. 284/17)

61. The Chairman said that motions (1) and (2) had been discussed together with other items and endorsed earlier.

(3) Request for extending the service hours of the bus route no. 290A to late night, or operating overnight bus service between Tseung Kwan O and areas such as Kwai Fong and Tsuen Wan, etc., and conducting extensive local consultation to improve the routing (SKDC(TTC) Paper Nos. 285/17 and 321/17)

62. The Chairman said that the motion was moved by Mr. Gary FAN and seconded by Mr. Frankie LAM, Mr. CHUNG Kam-lun, Mr. LEUNG Li, Mr. LUI Man-kwong and Mr. LAI Ming-chak.

63. Members noted the written reply from KMB.

64. Mr. CHU Cheuk-king of TD supplemented that the occupancy rate of route no. 290A after midnight was less than 20%, which reflected that there was limited demand for overnight transport service between Tseung Kwan O and Tsuen Wan. In fact, overnight public transport services in Hong Kong mainly provided connection to popular night-time entertainment spots or transport hubs, such as Tsim Sha Tsui, Mong Kok, etc., to provide convenience for residents leaving popular entertainment spots, as well as for night-time workers such as workers of the catering and service industries, which explained for the existing provision of various overnight public transport services in Yau Tsim Mong District. Currently, there were two overnight bus routes serving Tseung Kwan O District, including route nos. N293 and N796, which facilitate passengers to connect to other overnight public transport means, including the services offered by buses, green minibuses and red minibuses running to and from or via Mong Kok District to different districts in Hong Kong. At present, the service frequency of route nos. N293 and N796 could largely meet the demand. TD understood the demand and request of residents in Tseung Kwan O for overnight public transport services. Recently, KMB proposed route no. 293S to run via Kwun Tong Bypass for passengers to travel between the urban area and Tseung Kwan O more efficiently. For route no. N796, TD also planned to arrange the routing of four departures to extend to Wan Po Road every day, which would come into effect soon. The above series of measures reflected that the bus company was actively improving the overnight transport service in Tseung Kwan O. TD would closely keep in view the above services including the operation after enhancement, so as to make improvement and review the measures when necessary. 16

65. Members’ views were as follows:

 As the Tseung Kwan O Line of the MTR only operated until 1:00 a.m., Members supported enhancing overnight public transport services, in particular the services to and from Mong Kok and Tsim Sha Tsui.  Currently, the departures of route no. N796 only ran via Wan Po Road before 1:08 a.m., which failed to respond to residents’ needs. Members thus requested extending the overnight service to cover Wan Po Road.  The overnight bus routes mentioned by TD mainly provided services to Tseung Kwan O North but there was a lack of overnight public transport service in Tseung Kwan O South.  Members requested the provision of overnight green minibus routes between the urban area and Tseung Kwan O.  If the occupancy rate of the existing overnight bus route was not high enough, it was suggested that single decker bus should be considered to run the route in view of the keen public demand for overnight public transport service.  While route no. N293 had bus stops at Sheung Tak and Tseung Kwan O, the proposed route no. 293S would not set up stops there. Members requested adding those stops along route no. 293S and enhancing resources for the route lest its existing frequency would have to be reduced.

66. There being no amendment or objection from Members, the Chairman declared that the motion was endorsed and requested TD and KMB to follow up with regard to Members’ views.

(4) Request the Transport Department and the bus companies to operate special departures between Hong Sing Garden and Po Lam MTR Station (via Tsui Lam Bus Terminus) during rush hours, so as to solve the long-standing problem of inadequate green minibus service (SKDC(TTC) Paper Nos. 286/17 and 322/17)

67. The Chairman said that the motion was moved by Mr. Stanley TAM and seconded by Mr. WAN Yuet-cheung and Mr. Alfred AU.

68. Members noted the written reply from KMB.

69. Mr. CHU Cheuk-king of TD supplemented that bus service was different from minibus service in nature. Bus service had higher carrying capacity while minibus service was more flexible. Taking the example of services between Po Lam and Hong Sing Garden/Tsui Lam, the journey was relatively short and therefore minibus service was more efficient, convenient and frequent. On the contrary, operation of bus service was comparatively more time-consuming due to the time needed for pick-up and drop-off of passengers. For passengers, bus service was less attractive than minibus service. For instance, the public had a choice between bus and minibus services at many areas in Sai Kung District but minibus service was usually found more popular based on the experience of TD. Judging from operational and patronage efficiency, TD had reservation over the provision of overlapping bus service. TD was aware of Members’ concern over the service level of minibus route no. 17M. A survey had been carried out during morning and evening peak hours and it was found that the service could largely cope with the demand. Furthermore, Members were concerned about the impact of the traffic signals along Tsui Lam Road and Po Lam Road North on the operation of route no. 17M. TD had collected data for analysis and comparison and the results showed that 17

there was no huge difference in the overall journey time. Despite so, the operator would still exercise flexibility in deploying vehicle resources subject to the varying demands for traffic from both directions, including deploying empty vehicles to the terminus in reverse direction to ease passenger flow in a timely manner. TD and the operator would closely monitor the operation and make improvement when necessary.

70. Members’ views were as follows:

 Members had joined TD to conduct site visits at the area near Po Lam MTR Station and Tsui Lam during peak hours to inspect the minibus services and traffic signalling system. During the two site visits, it was found that the minibus services had significantly improved and passengers no longer needed to queue up to get on a minibus. However, some members of the public reflected that the situation recurred and questioned whether the minibus operator had enhanced the service frequency due to prior notice of site visits.  Taking the example of Tsui Chuk Garden in Wong Tai Sin, the total population of Hong Sing Garden, Tsui Lam Estate and King Ming Court exceeded that of Tsui Chuk Garden, but the former still had bus service to and from Wong Tai Sin MTR Station. Members requested TD to facilitate the provision of bus service for improving the uphill transportation.  Members suggested that empty vehicles should be deployed to provide bus service at the MTR station for residents with reference to the operation of minibus service.  Members had been concerned about the service of green minibus route no. 17M. Minibus service was no doubt more flexible and frequent than bus service. However, passengers had to wait for quite some time before getting on a minibus during peak hours. Members considered that when minibus service could not cope with passenger demand during peak hours, TD should provide alternative options for the public, such as special bus departures. Members asked TD to note that the captioned motion aimed at providing special departures during peak hours rather than creating cut-throat competition.  Taking KMB route no. 82B as an example, special departures from Mei Tin Estate to Tai Wai MTR Station were provided during morning peak hours at a fare of $4.1, and the minibus fare for the same route was $3.1. Despite so, when minibus service could not cope with the demand during morning peak hours, passengers would rather take the special departures of route no. 82B. As TD had approved the above arrangement and the bus company could provide service as a remedy, Members queried why TD had rejected the captioned proposal.

71. Mr. CHU Cheuk-king of TD responded that Members were mainly concerned about the service level of minibus route no. 17M, TD therefore hoped that the service of that route could be first improved at this stage. In fact, TD and the operator planned that the route would undergo a progressive replacement for 19-seater minibus in order to increase carrying capacity. TD had a site visit with the relevant Members earlier and discussed the feasibility of the minibus service providing special departures. TD would actively consider the proposal. In addition, the minibus operator would deploy empty vehicles to the terminus in reverse direction from time to time to ease passenger flow promptly. As to whether this arrangement could be made regular or stated in the Schedule of Service, so that the overall operation of minibus service could align with the travelling pattern of passengers (i.e. travelling downhill during morning peak hours and travelling uphill during evening peak hours), TD would actively follow up the issue with the operator.

72. Members’ views were as follows: 18

 The service of green minibus route nos. 15 and 17M had long been a subject of criticism. TTC had sought to improve the service for years but in vain.  Members were aware that many vehicles were left idle and parked at the terminus of green minibus route no. 105. It seemed that some drivers might be having their meals during evening peak hours, which gave rise to the insufficient manpower. Members thus urged the concerned parties to make proper manpower arrangement and suggested TD consider combining different routes in future tendering exercises to generate a synergistic effect and promote flexibility in the deployment of drivers.  In the past, many members of the public had complained about the service and mode of operation of the minibus operator. Members queried whether TD had been harbouring the operator and asked whether TD had considered replacing the operator.  As the carrying capacity of buses was higher than that of minibuses, Members suggested TD consider running the route with franchised buses.  The housing estates in the uphill area had been built for years. Since the commissioning of the MTR Tseung Kwan O Line, the demand for bus and minibus services to and from Po Lam MTR Station had long been overlooked. Thus, Members requested TD to conduct a detailed review of passenger demand and develop other feasible proposals to alleviate the situation, such as enhancement of pavements.  Members requested early implementation of the escalator link system to provide more options for residents to travel uphill.  TD suggested passengers take KMB route no. 296M to the uphill area, but there was no stop at Po Lam MTR Station for Hong Sing Garden bound trips, which could not help to alleviate passenger demand for minibus service. As stated in the captioned motion, if special departures were considered, the stop should be set up at Mau Yip Road to achieve its function. Furthermore, the shift to 19-seater minibus for green minibus route no. 17M would not bring about any significant effect and, in the long run, diversion could only be achieved through increasing special bus departures during peak hours.  KMB had operated special departures of route no. 93A from Tsui Lam to Po Lam Public Transport Interchange, but the fare of special departures was the same as that of regular departures which was unreasonable. Members considered that the fare of special departures should be lower than that of regular departures. For example, the section fare of route no. 690 (Hong Sing Garden bound) from Yan King Road stop was $5.2 whereas the fare of green minibus route no. 15 was $3.9, passengers therefore would not choose the former. Members requested the bus company to consider increasing competitiveness in pricing to benefit more passengers.  Green minibus route nos. 17M and 16 were managed by the same operator. It was learnt that the operator covered the loss from route no. 16 with the profit from route no. 17M. Nonetheless, the application for fare increase would be submitted together, which was unfair to passengers of route no. 17M. Members requested TD to address the issue and remedy the situation during re-tendering.

73. Mr. CHU Cheuk-king of TD responded that TD and the bus company noted Members’ views. As indicated by Members, TD had arranged special bus departures to supplement the public transport service between the uphill area and MTR station. Due to various reasons, the patronage was low. At this stage, TD inclined to carry out improvement measures for route no. 17M first. For route no. 105, TD considered that vehicles were parked and left idle at the terminus due to adjustment of minibus service and shortage of manpower. This year, TD had implemented various measures to improve the operation of minibus routes, including carrying capacity and operational efficiency, which were beneficial to remuneration of drivers and

maintaining frequency stability. It was planned that the minibus routes running in the district would undergo a progressive replacement for 19-seater minibuses, including minibus route nos. 103, 105, 17M, etc. TD would follow up with the operator about the improvement measures in various aspects.

74. Some Members supplemented that the special departures of route no. 93A introduced earlier ran from Tsui Lam to Po Lam during afternoon peak hours mainly for picking up school children, whereas the captioned motion catered for the needs of passengers travelling from Po Lam to the uphill area. The two routes fulfilled the needs of two different groups of passengers. TD could not reject the proposal because of the unsatisfactory patronage at that time.

75. There being no amendment or objection from Members, the Chairman declared that the motion was endorsed and requested TD and KMB to follow up with regard to Members’ views.

(5) Suggest the NWFB to increase the frequency and improve the lost trip problem of bus route no. 796X, and to look into providing special departures from Tiu Keng Leng to Hung Hom during rush hours (SKDC(TTC) Paper Nos. 287/17 and 323/17)

76. The Chairman said that the motion was moved by Mr. LEUNG Li and seconded by Mr. Gary FAN, Mr. CHUNG Kam-lun, Mr. LUI Man-kwong, Mr. LAI Ming-chak and Mr. Frankie LAM.

77. Members noted the written reply from NWFB.

78. Mr. CHU Cheuk-king of TD supplemented that TD had conducted a survey on the series of route no. 796 (Kowloon bound) the week before, and observed at the last stop (Kin Ming Estate) in Tseung Kwan O during morning peak hours that route no. 796X could generally maintain regular service at a headway of 10 to 15 minutes with an occupancy rate of about 80% without left-behind passengers. There were enough seats for passengers for the majority of departures and the overall service could meet the demand. TD and the bus company had earlier received reports from passengers that the frequency of route no. 796X had become unstable after diverting to Chi Shin Street. The bus company immediately improved the stability of the frequency of route no. 796X through operation adjustment of bus service. Subsequently in early October, TD had carried out a survey opposite the Capitol at Wan Po Road, and found that the departures of the route (Tsim Sha Tsui bound) could follow the schedule during morning peak hours and the overall service was normal. TD would closely monitor the route service and conduct a review with NWFB when necessary.

79. Members’ views were as follows:

 Members requested TD to provide a written reply on the captioned issue.  Since the captioned route had been extended to Tseung Kwan O Industrial Estate and diverted to run via Chi Shin Street, there were lost trips frequently. As the Beaumount stop (departure) and the Capitol/Le Prestige stop (return) were cancelled in the new route, passengers found it less convenient to take the route. Passengers needed to cross the bustling Wan Po Road to travel between their home and the bus stop, which posed safety hazard. Some residents had chosen other means of public transport instead. In this

connection, Members asked TD to provide the changes in patronage after re-routing for reference and requested NWFB to resume the original routing and terminate at LOHAS Park.  According to the written reply from NWFB, the occupancy rate of the captioned route to Tsim Sha Tsui during the busiest hour of the day in October was around 75%. From the survey carried out by TD the week before, the occupancy rate had increased to 80%. It showed that passenger demand and number of passengers were on the increase after route extension, Members therefore requested special departures and enhanced frequency.  There were frequently lost trips for the captioned route in the early stage of route extension, in particular during morning peak hours. As NWFB stated in its reply that bus service had been adjusted immediately to improve the situation, Members asked about the actual situation and whether the service adjustment was an interim or a regular measure. They also queried that the service adjustment could not cope with the rising passenger demand.  TTC only received the notification from TD of the re-routing of route no. 796 series about one week in advance. Many inadequacies were found during operation after the re-routing, including illegal parking, failure to provide bus stop shelters and road markings. It seemed that the preparatory measures were not quite comprehensive.  The extension of the captioned route would increase the driving time of drivers. Traffic accidents might occur if bus drivers had been driving for a long time without sufficient rest. Members asked TD and the bus company about the improvement measures.  The first departure of the captioned route was at 6:55 a.m. from Tseung Kwan O Industrial Estate. As the route was extended and the traffic congestion at Tseung Kwan O Tunnel was serious, the total journey time was increased to almost two hours. Passengers travelling from LOHAS Park to Kowloon were often unable to reach their destination on time. Since the first departure of the captioned route from Tseung Kwan O MTR Station was at 5:25 a.m., Members requested that the first departure of route no. 796X at 5:25 a.m. be extended to LOHAS Park.  Members welcomed the re-routing of route no. 796 series as it could cater for the needs of residents in Tseung Kwan O South. Members also requested information of the changes in patronage after the re-routing to understand the views of passengers on the new route and whether the locations of new stops were appropriate.  Currently, there was one departure of route no. 796E from Tseung Kwan O Industrial Estate to So Uk via Kowloon Bay Industrial Area every day. It was believed that the bus company had redeployed one departure from the captioned route to operate route no. 796E, so that passengers could not take the captioned route during that time period and could only change to take route no. 796E. However, route no. 796E had been diverted to run via Kowloon Bay Industrial Area, which increased the journey time of passengers who originally planned to take the captioned route.  Route no. 796E was re-routed to run via Oscar by the Sea and Kowloon Bay Industrial Area, the route was similar to the cancelled route no. 796S back then. In any case, the new route could provide convenience to residents of Oscar by the Sea. Members requested information on changes in patronage after the re-routing to review whether the service had to be enhanced and improved to shorten the journey distance and time and whether the locations of stops were appropriate to increase the attractiveness of route no. 796E.

80. Ms. Penny CHUNG of Citybus/NWFB responded as follows:

 Changes were introduced to route no. 796 series with effect from 25 September. During the first week, some departures of route no. 796X were not on schedule. After the

company had learnt of the situation from Members and the public, measures were carried out immediately through redeployment of internal resources and buses to maintain regular service. It was a long-term arrangement instead of a temporary adjustment for coping with emergency road condition. Service frequency then became stable with measures in place.  After re-routing, there was an increase in the patronage of route no. 796X. In October, the passenger loading was around 75% for journeys of both bounds. The bus company would continue to closely monitor the patronage.  Regarding the suggestions of enhanced frequency and provision of special departures, the bus company would continue to closely monitor the changes in patronage of route no. 796 series after the re-routing for further review.  There had been guidelines on bus captain working hours, rest times and meal breaks by TD. As it would take time to revise the guidelines, the company had discussed with the unions and the joint consultative committees about short-term improvement proposals to alleviate public concern. Currently, the working hours of bus captains of Citybus were temporarily reduced to within 13 hours. NWFB would gradually reduce the working hours of bus captains to within 13 hours as well as revise the mode of shift rotation, so that bus captains could have an alternation of long and short shifts to avoid having long shifts for consecutive days. In addition, the company and other franchised bus companies had discussed with TD about revising the guidelines on working hours and hoped to reach a consensus soon.

81. There being no amendment or objection from Members, the Chairman declared that the motion was endorsed and requested TD and NWFB to follow up with regard to Members’ views, and requested TD to provide a written reply to Members’ enquiries.

(Note: Please also refer to Paragraph 19)

(6) Request the Transport Department to consider relaxing the policy on residents’ bus service, so as to assist the trade to improve the operating conditions and to encourage the residents to use this public transport service (SKDC(TTC) Paper No. 288/17)

82. The Chairman said that the motion was moved by Mr. CHUNG Kam-lun and seconded by Mr. Gary FAN, Mr. LEUNG Li, Mr. LAI Ming-chak, Mr. LUI Man-kwong and Mr. Frankie LAM.

83. Mr. CHU Cheuk-king of TD responded that to ensure efficient use of Hong Kong’s limited road space and take into account environmental consideration, it was the Government’s transport policy to encourage the public to use the trunk services provided by mass carriers, i.e. railways and franchised buses, which made it convenient for the public to travel to and from busy areas. Residents’ bus services operated as supplementary services mainly during peak hours, especially for providing feeder services to and from MTR stations and major public transport interchanges in order to relieve the rush-hour demand on franchised buses and green minibuses. On this basis, TD would look into the circumstances of each case carefully in considering the applications relating to the operators of residents’ bus services.

84. Members’ views were as follows:

 In the Public Transport Strategy Study conducted earlier, the Government suggested introducing bus services with greater comfort and speedier journeys. Residents’ bus services provided no-standee feeder services with direct route, which was similar to the above suggestion in nature. Members moved the motion in the hope that the Government would note the views and review whether there was room for improvement on the basis of feeder bus service.  The Transport and Housing Bureau (THB) had once suggested introducing mid-sized buses of about 50 seats, which were similar to residents’ buses in nature. Members suggested writing to THB to explore the feasibility of the above suggestion in order to supplement the inadequacies of other public transport services, in particular the more popular minibus routes, including route nos. 1A, 101M and 17M. To protect passengers’ interests, the suggestion could be restricted to the routes regulated by TD.

85. Mr. CHU Cheuk-king of TD responded that the Government had raised the suggestion of introducing medium-sized buses in the Public Transport Strategy Study. TD would study whether there was room for improvement and implementation of the suggestion in the district. Regarding non-franchised buses especially that for residents’ services, it would be more suitable to address the issue separately at district level. In fact, many areas in Tseung Kwan O were covered by MTR with diversified public transport services. TD would continue to closely monitor the demand and give due consideration.

86. The Chairman said that it was not necessary to write to THB for the time being and suggested further exploring how to implement the proposal for introducing mid-sized buses subject to the circumstances. There being no amendment or objection from Members, the Chairman declared that the motion was endorsed and requested TD to follow up with regard to Members’ views.

(1) Request for increasing the frequency of service of the special departures of bus route no. 98D (from LOHAS Park to Tsim Sha Tsui (Nathan Road)) to cope with the population growth (SKDC(TTC) Paper Nos. 289/17 and 324/17)

87. The Chairman said that the question was raised by Ms. Christine FONG, Mr. CHEUNG Mei-hung and Mr. CHAN Kai-wai.

88. Members noted the written reply from KMB.

89. Mr. CHU Cheuk-king of TD supplemented that the special departures of route no. 98D and route no. 796P provided speedy services to Tsim Sha Tsui for residents in the vicinity of Wan Po Road. At present, the two routes could largely cope with the passenger demand. TD noted Members’ views and would study with the bus company whether there was a need to improve the service and conduct a review.

90. Members’ views were as follows:

 There was a loss of passengers taking route no. 796X for a number of reasons including the terminus at LOHAS Park having been cancelled, the locations of some stops being

inconvenient for passengers, and the increase in journey time. TTC had put forward different proposals for improving the service of route no. 796X, but improvement was yet to be made. Currently, there was only one special departure of route no. 98D every day. Members requested increasing its frequency to facilitate residents travelling to and from Tsim Sha Tsui East.  According to the written reply from KMB, the company supported the proposal in principle. However, there was no positive response from TD. Members requested TD to provide a written reply before year end.  Members asked TD whether it had studied with the bus company any specific plan for the captioned proposal.

91. Mr. CHU Cheuk-king of TD responded that before studying the proposal, TD would look into the patronage. TD had earlier reported the existing patronage of route no. 796P, and the passenger loading of the special departure of route no. 98D was merely less than 50%. TD would actively study whether there was room for adjusting the departure time or even providing additional special departures to attract passengers.

92. Members’ views were as follows:

 In response to the request of the public, TD should take forward some proposals supported by TTC and the bus company as soon as possible. If there was obstruction from TD, Members suggested writing to the Commissioner for Transport to reflect the situation.  There were tens of thousands of population in LOHAS Park area. At present, route no. 796P operated at a headway of 15 to 20 minutes. If it could complement the special departure of route no. 98D, the waiting time for residents would certainly be reduced bringing benefits to residents in the vicinity of Tseung Kwan O South and Hang Hau.  There was only one special departure of route no. 98D at 7:50 a.m. every day, the patronage would definitely not be high given that the frequency was low.  The special departures of route no. 98D from Hang Hau (North) during morning peak hours operated at a headway of 20 minutes, the frequency was even lower than that of regular departures which had a headway of 8 to 10 minutes. Members requested TD to actively consider increasing the frequency.

93. The Chairman requested TD and KMB to follow up Members’ views and requested TD to provide a written reply to the captioned issue as soon as possible.

VIII. Items related to minibus service

(A) Discussion and Matters Arising

(1) Progress on the follow up of minibus services by the Transport Department in response to the 5th meeting of the Traffic and Transport Committee in 2017 (Paragraph 93 of the minutes of last meeting) (SKDC(TTC) Paper No. 290/17)

94. Members noted the paper.

(2) Enquire whether the Transport Department would consider setting a trial period for the green minibus routes proposed to be operated in Tseung Kwan O South (Paragraph 94 of the minutes of last meeting)

95. With Members’ consent, the Chairman agreed to delete the above item.

(3) Request the green minibus route no. 110 to introduce section fare from Tiu Keng Leng to Kowloon Bay Industrial Area (Paragraphs 95 to 99 of the minutes of last meeting) (SKDC(TTC) Paper No. 330/17)

96. Members noted the written reply from TD.

97. With Members’ consent, the Chairman agreed to delete the above item.

(B) Items referred by Sai Kung District Council Meeting (Minibus)

(1) Request the Government to look into providing shelters and seats for the appropriate public minibus stops (Please refer to SKDC meeting on 7 November 2017 – SKDC(M) Paper Nos. 345/17 and 368/17)

98. Members’ views were as follows:

 Apart from the shelter at Po Lam stop of route no. 17M that was constructed by the green minibus operator, the shelters for most other stops were provided by TD. If the shelter for a minibus stop was provided by a minibus operator, the issues of retaining and handing over the shelter could be difficult when there was a change of operator in future. For the convenience of central management in future, Members requested TD to provide minibus stop shelters as soon as possible and suggested providing shelters at minibus termini first.  It was found that the minibus stop of route no. 15 outside Hau Tak Market often had quite a number of passengers waiting in the queue. As the proposal of Members for constructing a covered walkway there was not feasible, Members suggested that the minibus operator provide a minibus stop shelter so that the public would be shielded from wind and rain.  As the frequency of route no. 3 was low, Members had raised a number of suggestions to TD on providing a shelter at the minibus stop at Nam Shan Village earlier. Members enquired about the progress. Since it was learnt that the shelters for minibus stops of route nos. 2 and 4 were provided by the Government, the shelter for minibus stops of route no. 3 should also be provided by the Government.  Members asked TD whether the design of the shelter for minibus stop would resemble that of a solar-powered bus stop.  Members suggested allowing the green minibus operators to display advertisements at the minibus shelter to increase the source of income and provide incentive for constructing shelter.

99. Mr. CHU Cheuk-king of TD responded as follows:

 TD noted that Members requested minibus operators to construct shelters and other facilities at minibus stops. TD had always encouraged minibus operators to provide 25

shelters and other facilities, but it would depend on the individual circumstances of different routes, including the availability of suitable locations for constructing shelters at minibus stops. If an application was received, TD would process and assess the application accordingly.  TD understood the difficulty of Green Minibus operators in sustaining their business, in particular with the increasing operational expenditure. Operators might not be able to make ends meet with the fare revenue, which explained why additional resources could not be deployed for construction of shelters. As minibus operators and franchised bus companies varied in scale, TD had requested franchised bus companies to provide bus stop shelters upon the grant of a franchise.  TD had recently contacted some large Green Minibus operators and encouraged them to first provide shelters at minibus termini subject to their financial capacity.  If there was a change of Green Minibus operator, TD would make arrangements of handing over minibus stop shelters according to the established mechanism.  When constructing a large-scale Green Minibus terminus, TD would install a shelter in compliance with the standards of HyD.  Regarding the proposal of Members for the Government to finance the construction of shelters, TD would study with the relevant government departments the feasibility of providing shelters at appropriate minibus termini (including the terminus of minibus route nos. 3 and 4 at Yi Chun Street, Sai Kung) and report to TTC after the meeting.

100. Some Members welcomed the response of TD, and suggested TD study the installation of shelters at the open-air minibus termini, such as Hong Sing Garden, the terminus for departure and return trips of route no. 109 (i.e. at Oscar by the Sea and Hang Hau Station), Clear Water Bay Second Beach, etc.

101. The Chairman said that TD could first study the provision of shelters at minibus stops with heavy passenger flow and progressively implement the plan at other minibus stops. As TD would convene a meeting with the relevant minibus operators to discuss the provision of shelters at minibus stops, he suggested TTC not to convene any special meeting with TD and the minibus operators. The Chairman agreed to retain the above item.

IX. Items related to taxi service

(A) Discussion and Matters Arising

(1) Request the Transport Department to designate a boarding and alighting position for wheelchair users at the Tsui Lam Estate taxi stand, so as to provide convenience to wheelchair-bounded persons (Paragraph 100 of the minutes of last meeting)

102. With Members’ consent, the Chairman agreed to delete the above item.

103. The Chairman declared that the meeting was adjourned for lunch break.

(The meeting resumed at 1:45 p.m.)

X. Items related to MTR service

(A) Discussion and Matters Arising

104. The Chairman welcomed Ms. Rysta SO, Assistant Public Relations Manager – External Affairs of the MTR Corporation Limited (MTRCL).

(1) Progress on the follow up of MTR service by the MTR Corporation in response to the 5th meeting of the Traffic and Transport Committee in 2017 (Paragraph 113 of the minutes of last meeting) (SKDC(TTC) Paper No. 291/17)

105. Members noted the paper.

(2) Suggest to provide a cover for the escalator near Kai King Road and a lift at Po Lam MTR Station (Paragraphs 114 to 116 of the minutes of last meeting) (SKDC(TTC) Paper Nos. 292/17 and 333/17)

106. Members noted the written replies from the Lands Department (LandsD) and HyD.

107. With Members’ consent, the Chairman agreed to delete the above item.

(3) Request for completely covering the open road section between the LOHAS Park Station and the Pak Shing Kok Tunnels so as to reduce noise nuisance (Paragraphs 118 to 120 of the minutes of last meeting)

108. Ms. Rysta SO, Assistant Public Relations Manager, MTRCL said that MTR had been monitoring the operation of each rail line and carrying out maintenance and inspection of trains and rail tracks according to the established procedures. The noise level at the captioned open-air section already complied with the statutory standards.

109. With Members’ consent, the Chairman agreed to delete the above item.

110. As items (4) and (6) of Discussion and Matters Arising and a question were related to LOHAS Park Station, there being no objection from Members, the Chairman declared that the items would be discussed together.

(4) Urge the Mass Transit Railway to review the contingency plans for the Tseung Kwan O Line signaling equipment fault, and to upgrade the LOHAS Park Station so that its station services need not be handled by the Tseung Kwan O Station (Paragraphs 121 to 123 of the minutes of last meeting) (6) Request the MTR to increase the frequency of service of the Tseung Kwan O Line, advance the first train towards Po Lam/LOHAS Park Station, and provide toilets for passengers inside the paid areas (Paragraphs 128 to 130 of the minutes of last meeting)

Request the MTR to speed up the provision of seats on the platform and the installation of wide gates in the LOHAS Park Station for use by people in need (SKDC(TTC) Paper Nos. 293/17 and 325/17)

111. The Chairman said that the question was raised by Ms. Christine FONG, Mr. CHEUNG Mei-hung and Mr. CHAN Kai-wai.

112. Members noted the written reply from MTRCL.

113. Members’ views were as follows:

 According to the written reply from MTRCL, there were 49 seats at the platform of LOHAS Park Station. However, the trains at LOHAS Park Station were scheduled at a frequency of 12 minutes which were unable to cope with the demand of passengers (particularly pregnant women and the elderly). Considering that there was still space at the platform of LOHAS Park Station, Members requested MTRCL to consider the suggestion of providing additional seats.  There was only one wide gate at LOHAS Park Station, quite a lot of passengers would queue up to use the wide gate during peak hours. There were occasional incidents of chaos and arguments. It was also common to see a number of disabled persons and adults with their babies and infants at LOHAS Park Station. Even though MTRCL had deployed staff to assist passengers and ease passenger flow, the impact was not obvious. Some Members had joined MTRCL for a site visit and believed that MTRCL understood where the problem lay. In addition, after the completion of shopping mall at LOHAS Park area, exit B would be provided. Thus, Members requested MTRCL to install additional wide gates as soon as possible.  Regarding the arrangement of deploying not-in-service trains every morning from Tiu Keng Leng to Po Lam, Members requested MTRCL to use those trains to pick up passengers on the way to Po Lam.  As a satellite station, the station services of LOHAS Park Station including ticketing and platform operation were handled by staff of Tseung Kwan O Station. Besides, it also relied on Tseung Kwan O Station to cope with emergency incidents through redeployment of manpower, which made the situation unsatisfactory.

114. Ms. Rysta SO of MTRCL responded that MTRCL understood the situation and would continue to monitor the operation of LOHAS Park Station. MTRCL would also relay Members’ views to the relevant department for reference.

115. The Chairman asked MTRCL to follow up Members’ views. The item “Request the MTR to increase the frequency of service of the Tseung Kwan O Line, advance the first train towards Po Lam/LOHAS Park Station, and provide toilets for passengers inside the paid areas” was retained and the item “Urge the Mass Transit Railway to review the contingency plans for the Tseung Kwan O Line signaling equipment fault, and to upgrade the LOHAS Park Station so that its station services need not be handled by the Tseung Kwan O Station” was deleted.

(5) Request for renovating the covered walkway between Tong Chun Street and the MTR Station (Paragraphs 124 to 127 of the minutes of last meeting)

116. Members’ views were as follows:

 TTC joined MTR earlier to inspect the captioned walkway. As observed, the wear and tear of the walkway was serious with rust and stains found, the public might be infected after contact. Before the completion of the elevated walkway between Tong Ming Street and Tong Tak Street, many people would still use the covered walkway every day. Members urged MTRCL to renovate the captioned walkway.  The materials of the captioned walkway were aging. Members worried that the falling of materials would cause injuries to passers-by. Members asked MTRCL to respond whether third-party insurance had been taken out and consider renovating the captioned walkway. Besides, Members also suggested writing to the Chief Executive Officer of MTRCL to request MTRCL to provide a timetable for renovation works.

117. Ms. Rysta SO of MTRCL responded that MTRCL had been monitoring the condition of the temporary covered walkway at Tong Chun Street. The existing condition of the walkway was satisfactory. Whenever there was notification, MTRCL would take follow-up action and carry out maintenance works as soon as possible. MTRCL would continue to keep in view community development and assess whether there was room for improvement bearing in mind Members’ views on the appearance of the temporary facility.

118. The Chairman agreed to retain the above item one more time and would write to MTRCL to request the provision of timetable for renovating the captioned walkway.

(6) Request the MTR to increase the frequency of service of the Tseung Kwan O Line, advance the first train towards Po Lam/LOHAS Park Station, and provide toilets for passengers inside the paid areas (Paragraphs 128 to 130 of the minutes of last meeting)

119. The Chairman said that item (6) had been discussed together with other items earlier.

(7) Request the MTR to provide new maps and signs at the exits in the Po Lam Station (Paragraphs 131 to 134 of the minutes of last meeting)

120. As the works for including the location of “Social Security Field Unit” on the street maps in the lobby of the Po Lam Station was completed, the Chairman agreed to delete the above item with Members’ consent.

(B) 1 Question presented by Members (MTR)

(1) Request the MTR to speed up the provision of seats on the platform and the installation of wide gates in the LOHAS Park Station for use by people in need (SKDC(TTC) Paper Nos. 293/17 and 325/17)

121. The Chairman said that the item had been discussed together with other items earlier.

XI. Items related to other public transport services

(A) Discussion and Matters Arising

(1) Request the Transport Department to alleviate the problem that it is difficult for the residents living in the vicinity of the bus stop at Ho Chung Village to get on buses during the rush hours every day (Paragraphs 103 to 106 of the minutes of last meeting)

122. Mr. CHU Cheuk-king of TD reported that TD had recently convened a meeting with the Green Minibus operator to discuss its services, in particular the routing of route no. 1A. The route would be progressively run with 19-seater minibus starting from recent months. TD also reflected the views of Members to the operator at the meeting, such as enhancing the arrangements of having special departures at en route stops along Hiram’s Highway and picking up passengers with empty vehicles. As there were a number of en route stops along the road section, the operator hoped to increase the carrying capacity by putting 19-seater minibuses into operation in the coming one to two months. By then, the arrangement of empty vehicles would be considered to pick up passengers at more en route stops. Furthermore, adjustment of the starting pick-up points of empty vehicles might even be implemented, which included Pak Wai, Pak Sha Wan and Ho Chung. TD would continue to follow up the issue with the operator, including processing and approving the applications for increasing the number of 19-seater minibuses, followed by discussion on how to appropriately adjust the starting pick-up points of empty vehicles.

123. Members’ views were as follows:

 Members were pleased to know that TD and the minibus operator had followed up the arrangement of adjusting the starting pick-up point for empty vehicles to Pak Wai.  It was observed that during 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m., empty minibuses returned to Marina Cove to pick up passengers. Members hoped that the arrangement could be extended to Pak Wai.  Traffic accidents sometimes occurred at the entrance of Pak Wai Tsuen, which posed danger to passengers in the queue. Members asked TD to note and remind the operator to take note of the situation.  As there was power supply at the bus stop at Marina Cove, Members requested KMB to provide arrival time information panel as soon as possible.  It was learnt that only a few 19-seater minibuses for route no. 1A were provided, Members hoped that TD could assist in replacing the remaining minibuses as soon as possible.  Members urged KMB to increase the frequency of the route during peak hours and opined that patronage was not the only factor to be considered.  The special departures of KMB route no. 92 would run via New Hiram’s Highway but would not stop at some en route stops such as Nam Wai and Wo Mei. Members considered that special departures should also stop at all en route stops when the bus was not fully loaded.

124. Mr. CHU Cheuk-king of TD responded that the bus company had planned to install arrival time information panels. Priority would be accorded to projects for bus stops in the vicinity of Hiram’s Highway, which were expected to complete at year end and early next year. TD would follow up the progress with the bus company and report to TTC.

125. The Chairman said that the routing of special departures of route no. 92 was the same as that of regular departures. TD and KMB were asked to study the suggestion of stopping at all en route stops for special departures and report at the next meeting. The Chairman agreed to retain the above item one more time. 30

XII. Items related to road works / facilities

(A) Discussion and Matters Arising

(1) Transport Department’s Report on the Follow up of the Traffic Works/Facilities in Sai Kung and Tseung Kwan O (Paragraph 136 of the minutes of last meeting) (SKDC(TTC) Paper No. 294/17)

126. Members noted the paper.

(2) The Main Traffic Improvement items and timetable from Highways Department (Sai Kung and Tseung Kwan O) Request the SKDC Traffic and Transport Committee, which has been following up the expansion works of the bus stop at Fu Ning Garden, and relevant departments to enhance and continue to follow up the works (Paragraphs 137 to 141 of the minutes of last meeting) (SKDC(TTC) Paper No. 295/17)

127. Members noted the paper.

128. Mr. Alan HU, Engineer/Pedestrian Improvements of TD reported that regarding the expansion works of the bus stop at Fu Ning Garden, Members and the public in the district did not have any objection and the proposal had been passed to HyD for following up .

129. Some Members thanked TD for paying visits to the site for inspection on a number of occasions and said that the works were expected to commence in June 2018 and completed in November of the same year. Members expected TD to maintain close communication with different stakeholders during the works period to report the works progress in a timely manner.

130. The Chairman agreed to retain the above item.

(3) Request the Transport Department to extend Po Lam Road, increase carriageway for Tsui Lam Road and construct a roundabout at the junction of O Tau Village to improve the traffic condition (Paragraphs 142 to 144 of the minutes of last meeting) (SKDC(TTC) Paper No. 296/17)

131. Members noted the written reply from TD.

132. Mr. WOO Kwong-ming, Engineer/Special Duties 1 of TD reported that the layout plan was nearly completed. TD was reviewing the traffic signs and road markings as well as the swept path analysis to assess whether slight adjustment to the layout plan was necessary. It was expected that the consultation paper could be forwarded to SKDC members and the relevant department via SKDO in early December. TD would also continue to follow up the issue with HyD after the consultation.

133. Members’ views were as follows: 31

 Members supported the captioned proposal, but quite a lot of vehicles would head to Kowloon from Po Lam Road North via Tsui Lam Road during morning peak hours, and the green time of traffic light there could only allow three to four vehicles to pass in each traffic lane. Currently, TD was planning to change one of the traffic lanes to reverse direction and the number of vehicles that could pass the traffic light would definitely decrease. When there were heavy vehicles, the number of vehicles that could pass the traffic light would even be fewer. Members asked TD about the measures to cope with the vehicular flow and requested TD to carry out trial runs or even expand one traffic lane to allow more vehicles and heavy vehicles to pass the junction.  Members requested TD to provide the cycle time of traffic signals in preparing the consultation paper.  After a serious traffic accident at Tsui Lam Road in the early years, the location was converted from two-way two-lane traffic to one-way two-lane traffic. If it was converted back to two-way two-lane traffic, it was worried that traffic accidents would take place.  TD had made a similar suggestion in the past but since vehicles were prohibited from making left turn from Tsui Lam Road to Po Lam Road, Members rejected the suggestion. As the latest suggestion of TD was more comprehensive and provided convenience to residents of O Tau Village, Members hoped that it could be implemented as early as possible. Although the suggestion would affect the arrangement of traffic lane at Tsui Lam Road, Members hoped that all parties could strike a balance.

134. Mr. WOO Kwong-ming of TD responded that TD noted Members’ views and would arrange site visits with the relevant Members and explain the situation.

135. The Chairman believed that TD and HyD understood Members’ views and would come up with feasible suggestions on the basis of professional knowledge. TD was asked to submit the final suggestion to TTC when appropriate. The Chairman agreed to retain the above item.

(4) Request to provide pedestrian crossing facility at Ying Yip Road for the safety of pedestrians Request the Transport Department to attach importance to the call for the prompt widening of Ying Yip Road (the section between Chap Fuk Road and Po Ning Road) and installation of traffic lights there (Paragraphs 145 to 152 of the minutes of last meeting)

136. Mr. Alan HU of TD reported that regarding the works at Ying Yip Road northbound (the section between Chap Fuk Road and Po Ning Road), TD had no comments on the temporary traffic arrangement made by the contractor.

137. Mr. NG Kin-fung, District Engineer/Tseung Kwan O of HyD reported that HyD had issued the Works Request Form to the contractor and the works were expected to commence the following week and to be completed in mid-2018.

138. Some Members said that the progress of the above works (project no.: NE/10/2686) in SKDC(TTC) Paper No. 295/17 submitted by HyD was “under planning”. Since the TD staff had just reported that the works would commence soon, Members reminded HyD to update the progress.

139. The Chairman asked TD to follow up the above issue and agreed to retain the above item.

(5) Request to alleviate the traffic congestion problem at Clear Water Bay Road and New Clear Water Bay Road Suggest to construct the Clear Water Bay Road – Tseung Kwan O Pak Shing Kok Link to alleviate the traffic pressure of Sai Kung and Clear Water Bay Request the Transport Department to pay attention to the severe traffic congestion at Clear Water Bay Road and New Clear Water Bay Road and solve the problem by widening the roads and constructing flyovers (Paragraphs 150 to 155 of the minutes of last meeting) (SKDC(TTC) Paper No. 297/17)

140. Members noted the written reply from THB.

141. Mr. TSE Leung-yau of HyD reported that the road widening works for Clear Water Bay Road near the Silverstrand roundabout were underway and the progress was satisfactory. Members were asked to note that the works involved relocation and modification of many underground facilities there.

142. Members’ views were as follows:

 The section of Clear Water Bay Road between Cheng Chek Chee Secondary School of Sai Kung and Hang Hau was always congested during morning peak hours and holidays. Members hoped that the situation could be improved as soon as possible.  Members were aware that the site for the road widening works at Clear Water Bay Road near the Silverstrand roundabout was left unattended recently and questioned whether the works were intentionally slowed down. Members requested HyD to urge the parties concerned to lay underground facilities as soon as possible to speed up the works progress.  A telephone number was provided on the placard for the road widening works at Clear Water Bay Road near the Silverstrand roundabout. Members asked whether calls to the telephone number would be answered on Sunday. In addition, Members suggested providing a mobile number for the public to contact the relevant department or contractor.  Following the intake of residents of housing estates at Anderson Road, it was expected that the vehicular flow would exceed the capacity of Clear Water Bay Road. The solution to the traffic congestion problem at Clear Water Bay Road and New Clear Water Bay Road was not limited to widening a single junction. Different proposals were set out in the captioned motion, such as constructing flyovers at the section of Clear Water Bay Road near Tai Po Tsai Village and increasing traffic lanes from the junction of Anderson Road to the flyover at Shun Lee Estate. Members hoped that TD could re-consider the proposals.

143. Mr. TSE Leung-yau of HyD responded that HyD would continue to urge the underground facility companies to complete the works on schedule and believed that there was no intentional delay of works. However, those companies had to take turns to carry out the works at the site, which would take some time to deal with the underground facilities. Currently, the power company was connecting wires and HyD would continue to follow up the works progress. As regards the telephone number on the placard for the works, it was the hotline of HyD. HyD would ensure the accuracy of information and the display of information at suitable location.

144. The Chairman said that some residents were not clear about the arrangement that

underground facility companies had to take turns carrying out the works, which might lead to the misunderstanding that the works were suspended. He asked HyD to continue monitoring the works progress and ensure accuracy of information on the placard including the anticipated completion date. Furthermore, the new development projects at Clear Water Bay Road would be progressively completed. He hoped that TD could make preparation and accept the views of TTC in order to solve the congestion problem.

145. Ms. Rica LAW, Engineer/Sai Kung of TD said that Members had earlier suggested installing a pedestrian pushbutton at the junction of Clear Water Bay Road and Ngan Ying Road so that the traffic light would only turn red after pedestrians pressed the button. TD had earlier collected vehicular and pedestrian statistics there. From the perspective of traffic management, TD considered the proposal feasible and would prepare the Works Request Form to implement the proposal if TTC did not raise any objection. Upon implementation of the proposal, pedestrians crossing Clear Water Bay Road would need to press the button, whereas the vehicular green time of traffic lights at Clear Water Bay Road (Kowloon bound) would be extended.

146. Members’ views were as follows:

 Members supported TD’s proposal for installing a pedestrian pushbutton at the junction off the Shaw House and asked TD to provide a suitable sign to inform residents of the new measure.  After buses of route nos. 91 and 91M departed from Ngan Ying Road stop (Kowloon bound), many vehicles behind would make a turn to Ngan Ying Road from the right lane to reach the international school, it was difficult for the buses to cut the line to drive to the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology stop via Ngan Ying Road. Members suggested TD consider relocating the bus stop at Ngan Ying Road.

147. The Chairman suggested TD study the proposal for relocating the bus stop at Ngan Ying Road to an existing lay-by ahead of the traffic light and arranging the stop after the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology stop. Coaches were parked there and it was believed that buses could also stop there.

148. Ms. Rica LAW of TD responded that TD had consulted the bus company on the relocation of Ngan Ying Road stop. At present, the bus stop was close to a pedestrian crossing and residential estates near Ngan Ying Road were located at the right of the bus stop. If the stop was moved northwards, the bus company said that it would increase the walking distance of residents travelling to and from the bus stop. Besides, there might not be sufficient space to relocate the bus stop due to the narrow walkway. The bus company did not support the proposal and TD had no plan for relocating the bus stop at this stage.

149. Mr. CHU Cheuk-king of TD responded that TD had earlier received the proposal for relocating Ngan Ying Road bus stop towards the direction of Sai Kung. Currently, the bus stop was located at the east of the junction between Clear Water Bay Road and Ngan Ying Road, and a bus shelter was also provided there. TD had studied the proposal with the bus company. If the bus stop was relocated to the bus bay at the west of the junction, it was worried that the walking distance for passengers would be increased. Further to that, there might not be sufficient space to provide a bus stop shelter as the walkway was quite narrow. In view of the above, the bus company had reservation over the proposal. Moreover, if the new stop was to be provided after the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology stop as suggested in the 34

proposal, residents at Ngan Ying Road would find it more difficult to get a seat after getting on the bus. Residents might have different views on this proposal. At this stage, TD was pleased to listen to the views of all parties on the proposal.

150. The Chairman said that the proposal could alleviate the traffic congestion problem and there was a pedestrian crossing near the suggested location of bus stop. If necessary, a site visit could be made to study the feasibility of the proposal.

151. Members’ views were as follows:

 Members suggested that reference should be made to the design of bus lanes at Cross Harbour Tunnel to provide yellow box marking at the road section between the road off the existing Ngan Ying Road bus stop and the section ahead of the traffic light so that it would be easier for buses to cut the line.  If the new stop was arranged after the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology stop, there might be left-behind passengers at Ngan Ying Road stop. Members suggested TD consider the proposal carefully.

152. The Chairman summarised that TTC supported the proposal for installing a pedestrian pushbutton at the junction off the Shaw House and asked TD to provide a suitable sign to inform residents of the new measure. In addition, the Chairman said that TD could first consider the proposal for providing yellow box marking. If it was not practicable, TD would then consider the proposal for relocating the bus stop. The Chairman agreed to retain above item.

(6) Request the Government to construct pedestrian links (including footbridges, covered walkways, elevators and escalators) to connect Hong Sing Garden, King Ming Court and Tsui Lam Estate with Po Lam area Request the Government to increase resources for the 18 districts to expedite uphill works, implement the project of the covered walkway and the escalator link system between Hong Sing Garden and Po Hong Road and provide the works schedule(s) (Paragraphs 159 to 161 of the minutes of last meeting) (SKDC(TTC) Paper No. 298/17)

153. Members noted the written reply from TD.

154. Members’ views were as follows:

 Members asked TD about the time to commence the study on review and improvement of the assessment mechanism for the uphill escalator link project and the items to be reviewed.  After the commissioning of MTR Tseung Kwan O Line, only uphill residents could not walk to MTR station. Over the years, TTC had made different proposals to the Government, but the short and medium-term measures were not accepted due to various reasons. Members hoped to understand the policy direction of TD.  Members enquired about the latest progress of the 10 priority proposals. If the Government considered the new proposals together with the original proposals, Members also enquired whether the priority of the original proposals would be affected and whether the 18 original proposals would be handled before the new proposals.  Some Members had expressed views on the captioned item at the Legislative Council and

suggested the Government consider the needs of residents of Tsui Lam Estate in the study. TTC had made earnest efforts for years and the Commissioner for Transport had also said that the uphill escalator link project should be implemented as soon as possible. Thus, Members suggested retaining the above item.  The pavement connecting the existing footbridge of Hong Sing Garden and To Lok Road footpath had been completed. Members had suggested at another working group meeting the addition of lighting system at To Lok Road footpath. Members enquired whether HyD would consider the proposal and if funding was granted by SKDC, they also asked whether HyD would facilitate the works to be implemented.

155. Mr. WOO Kwong-ming of TD responded that it was expected that the Government would announce the latest progress of the uphill escalator link project in early or mid-2018, the Government would also consider the proposals for Tsui Lam Estate and King Ming Court together.

156. Mr. NG Kin-fung of HyD responded that HyD had earlier contacted SKDO about the proposal of providing lighting at To Lok Road footpath. It was found that the road section did not fall under the purview of HyD. In such circumstances, HyD normally would not provide lighting there. Staff of HyD’s Lighting Division would continue to liaise with SKDO to explore other feasible options.

157. Mr. Marco CHU, Assistant District Officer (Sai Kung)2, SKDO supplemented that the addition of lighting system at To Lok Road footpath was a proposal for district minor works. District minor works were funded by SKDC and implemented through the works departments. Currently, SKDO was liaising with HyD to see if it could be the works department of the project. Even though HyD had pointed out that the road section was not under its purview, it was hoped that HyD could consider accepting the proposal.

158. The Chairman agreed to retain the above item.

(7) Request to promptly construct two footbridges in the south and north across Wan Po Road in order to meet the demands of residents of LOHAS Park and the Beaumount (Paragraphs 162 to 164 of the minutes of last meeting) (SKDC(TTC) Paper Nos. 297/17, 299/17 and 305/17)

159. Members noted the written replies from THB, LandsD, HyD, MTRCL, the Leisure and Cultural Services Department (LCSD), the Development Bureau (DEVB) and TD.

160. Members’ views were as follows:

 Members requested the Government to use part of the green area to construct a footbridge while LCSD had no plan to build any indoor recreation centre and prepare the timetable for the time being. However, LandsD only reported in the reply the current status of the green area without responding to the above request. Members suggested writing to LandsD again to request the department to continue taking follow-up action and explain to TTC the procedures if a works department took the initiative to construct a footbridge there.  The reply from DEVB was the same as its previous reply in March 2017, whereas the reply from LCSD indicated that a small part of the green area could be used. TTC also

unanimously endorsed the captioned motion. In the light of the above and given that it would take time to construct the footbridge, Members suggested writing to the Planning and Lands Branch of DEVB again to request the works departments to take follow-up actions and take forward the proposal for using the green area to construct a footbridge to provide convenience to residents near Shek Kok Road.  The developer of Nos. 1-3 Shek Kok Road would construct a footbridge across Wan Po Road, but no government department was responsible for the construction on government land (i.e. the green area), rendering the footbridge ending at Wan Po Road without connecting to the green area. According to the land exchange deed, the developer had to complete the construction of residential project and the footbridge across Wan Po Road by 2022. In this regard, Members requested expediting the process of demarcating part of the green area for constructing a footbridge that connected to the footbridge across Wan Po Road.  Members suggested writing to DEVB, THB and MTRCL to enquire about the planning of pedestrian walkway system connecting the development projects near Shek Kok Road (including the Beaumount, the Beaumount II, Nos. 1-3 Shek Kok Road, the international school and other facilities) and Tseung Kwan O Comprehensive Development Area 86 as well as that within Area 86, so that TTC could study the feasibility of using the green area for constructing footbridges.  Members enquired about the latest progress of renovation works for the stairs of the subway at Shek Kok Road.

161. The Chairman said that in the reply from LandsD, if a government department would like to use the green area for development, the Railway Development Section of LandsD would resume the green area from the grantee according to the terms of the land deed and hand over the area to the government department for the required use upon receiving the request from the government department. LCSD also expressed that it was willing to co-ordinate with other departments and/or other organisations for planning and development, and to consider carving out a small portion of the green area for constructing footbridges. However, no government department currently planned to construct footbridges at the green area. It was asked whether the above understanding was correct.

162. Mr. Alan HU, Engineer of TD responded that in the reply from LandsD, the developer of Nos. 1-3 Shek Kok Road had to construct the Southern footbridge according to the terms of the land exchange deed.

163. The Chairman said that letters would be issued to THB, DEVB and MTRCL requesting them to reply to the enquiries about the planning of the pedestrian walkway system. The above item would be retained.

(8) Request the government department to promptly enhance Fei Ngo Shan Road including the construction of a footpath to separate vehicles and pedestrians and beautify the road (Paragraphs 168 to 174 of the minutes of last meeting) (SKDC(TTC) Paper No. 306/17)

164. Members noted the written reply from HyD.

165. Members’ views were as follows:

 Many people would stroll along Fei Ngo Shan Road during weekend, but the measures taken by TD had merely tinkered at the edges and effective improvement to the current condition was yet to be made. Members requested TD to construct a footpath and clear crushed stones from the section of Fei Ngo Shan Road near Clear Water Bay Road.  Although a footpath was provided at the section of Fei Ngo Shan Road between Flamingo Garden and Customs Pass, most of the road section was covered by weeds. Members suggested LCSD provide planters at the road section for beautification and expected TD to relay the views to the relevant department.

166. Ms. Rica LAW of TD responded that TD would continue to monitor the pedestrian and traffic conditions at Fei Ngo Shan Road. TD would study the referral of the proposal for providing planters to the relevant department for follow-up work.

167. The Chairman enquired about the progress of following up the views raised at the last meeting regarding tree branches extending to the carriageway at Fei Ngo Shan Road near the section of Clear Water Bay Road bound for Clear Water Bay.

168. Mr. TSE Leung-yau of HyD responded that HyD had relayed part of the views on the trees to LCSD for follow-up work via the Secretariat. HyD would continue to monitor and trim the trees under its purview.

169. Some Members said that many fallen twigs were found at major trunk roads such as Clear Water Bay Road after the typhoon. As different departments were responsible for maintaining and taking care of trees at different land lots, it was necessary to contact 1823 and LandsD to find out which government department was responsible for carrying out the work when the above situation was found. In this connection, Members requested the Government to provide the plans for Clear Water Bay Road, Hiram’s Highway and Wan Po Road for TTC to know which departments were responsible for follow-up work of the various road sections and slopes.

170. The Chairman considered that cases could be effectively referred to the relevant departments for follow-up after reports were made to 1823. He had doubts as to which department was responsible for handling the request for information and whether the information could be provided. The Chairman agreed to retain the above item one more time.

(9) Request for reviewing and improving the directional signs in the Wan Po area, and installing railings on the area that separates the road in the middle along Wan Po Road (opposite Le Prestige) (Paragraphs 175 to 180 of the minutes of last meeting)

171. Members’ views were as follows:

 TD had not given any reply on the captioned item. In addition, Members requested TD to provide photos and a detailed paper regarding the provision of additional signs.  The speed limit at Wan Po Road was 70 km per hour and a lot of heavy vehicles would use the road. Since the re-routing of route no. 796X, passengers jaywalking across Wan Po Road after alighting from vehicles had become more serious. Members requested TD to install central dividers as soon as possible or study with LCSD or the Civil Engineering and Development Department on whether planting shrubs with hard stems could inhibit

pedestrians from jaywalking.

172. Mr. Alan HU of TD responded as follows:

 TD had issued the Works Request Form to HyD and the Correctional Services Department in early November regarding the signs indicating the direction of LOHAS Park and the works concerned were underway. TD could provide the relevant information after the meeting.  TD was very concerned with pedestrian safety. The existing divider kerb in the middle of Wan Po Road already served the function of preventing pedestrians from jaywalking.

173. With Members’ consent, the Chairman agreed to delete the above item.

(10) Request for constructing a footbridge over the road section between the Pak Shek Wo Tsuen and the Pak Shek Wo San Tsuen in Tseng Lan Shue near Clear Water Bay Road that conforms to the principles of the “Universal Accessibility” Programme, and installing a lift for the footbridge which can also be used to provide barrier-free access to facilitate the residents to cross the road safely and to improve their living environment (Paragraphs 181 to 183 of the minutes of last meeting) (SKDC(TTC) Paper No. 297/17)

174. Members noted the written reply from THB.

175. Members’ views were as follows:

 The request for constructing a footbridge was rejected by TD on the grounds of low pedestrian flow. Members considered that the pedestrian flow was inevitably low as it was dangerous to cross the road section without having a footbridge there.  The captioned proposal was not included in the “Universal Accessibility” Programme but could provide barrier-free access to residents in the vicinity (including Hillview Court, Clear Water Bay Apartments, Clear Water Bay Knoll, Pak Shek Terrace, Pak Shek Wo Tsuen and Pak Shek Wo San Tsuen) and ensure safety of road users which was beneficial to the neighbourhood.  Members requested constructing a footbridge over the road section between Pak Shek Wo Tsuen and Pak Shek Wo San Tsuen in Tseng Lan Shue near Clear Water Bay Road and installing a lift to connect to the footbridge. Regarding the road section between Pak Shek Terrace and Lung Wo Tsuen, the speed limit should be changed from 70 km per hour to 50 km per hour. As the “Universal Accessibility” Programme and barrier-free access were introduced by the Chief Executive, Members suggested writing to the relevant departments including the Chief Executive’s Office to express the above request.  As the vehicle speed at the captioned road section was exceptionally fast, pedestrians (in particular the elderly) might not be able to make timely reaction to the situation which made road crossing more dangerous.  Vehicles always illegally parked at the lay-by near Pak Shek Wo Tsuen at Clear Water Bay Road (Kowloon bound) which blocked the sightline of pedestrians and drivers. Members requested TD to set up a “no stopping” zone to improve the situation.  Works were being carried out in the middle of the road section near Tseng Lan Shue, but the contractor did not remove the triangular-shaped “road narrows” sign after completing

their work every day while another contractor placed the machinery close to the parapets which would impose danger to drivers. Members requested HyD to properly regulate the placing of items by contractors within the site.

176. Ms. Rica LAW of TD responded that according to the statistics of TD, the pedestrian flow was rather low and the sight distance of the pedestrian crossing was clear. In this case, TD could not consider the proposal for the time being. TD also noted that some Members did not agree to the proposal for restricting the vehicle speed there. In fact, TD established a mechanism to review the speed limit of roads in Hong Kong on a regular basis and timely reviews would be conducted. In October, TD had issued the Works Request Form to HyD for changing to double white line road marking to restrict vehicles from changing lanes at the pedestrian crossing. For the problem of illegal parking, the setting up of a “no-stopping” zone was to reduce traffic congestion caused by the picking up and alighting of passengers rather than solving illegal parking.

177. Mr. CHU Chi-wai, OC District Traffic Team (Tseung Kwan O) of Hong Kong Police Force (HKPF) responded that after the Police had received Members’ views at past meetings, it had increased the frequency of using laser guns near Pak Shek Wo San Tsuen at Clear Water Bay Road. For the illegal parking problem, the Police would take follow-up actions.

178. The Chairman suggested writing to the Chief Executive’s Office to express the request of Members and agreed to retain the above item one more time.

(11) Request the Transport Department to pave a footpath on the slope next to the Tsui Lam Estate near Po Lam Road North (Paragraphs 184 to 186 of the minutes of last meeting)

179. Mr. WOO Kwong-ming of TD reported that TD had submitted the plan to HyD to estimate the works cost and would conduct statistical survey on pedestrian flow in early December.

180. Members’ views were as follows:

 Many students of SKH Tseung Kwan O Kei Tak Primary School and parents would walk past the captioned slope of some 500 m long during the periods before and after school. As there was no pedestrian crossing at the section between Po Hong Road and Po Lam Road North along the way, they had to make a detour to cross the road to the footpath near Po Lam Road North northbound. Members reiterated the necessity of the captioned footpath and requested TD to actively consider the proposal.  Members queried whether TD had conducted statistical survey on the pedestrian flow for the construction of the footpath from Hong Sing Garden to To Lok Road. Members opined that TD should apply the same standard in reviewing different works. Besides, pedestrian flow should not be the only factor to be considered given that the pedestrian flow at a road section without a footpath should be inevitably low.  At present, jaywalking was common among passengers (including children) of minibus route no. 105 alighting at Tsui Lam Estate stop. Members worried that the situation would deteriorate after completion of the captioned footpath and requested TD to consider the ancillary measures concurrently when studying the proposal to prevent the occurrence of accidents.

181. Mr. WOO Kwong-ming of TD responded that TD would consider the cost effectiveness and explore other alternatives in studying each improvement project. TD had explained the alternative proposal to the Members concerned earlier, including the provision of pedestrian crossing at Po Hong Road.

182. The Chairman said that many school children would walk past the slope and pedestrian safety should be the principal consideration of TD. He hoped that TD could actively implement the proposal and agreed to retain the above item.

(12) Request for providing motorcycle parking spaces in the vicinity of Kwong Ming Court and Sheung Tak Estate (Paragraphs 187 to 189 of the minutes of last meeting) (SKDC(TTC) Paper No. 326/17)

183. The Chairman said that TTC had a site visit with TD on 31 October.

184. Members noted the written reply from TD.

185. The Chairman said that a motion and another item referred by SKDC meeting were relevant to the above item. There being no objection from Members, the Chairman declared that the items be discussed together.

Request the Transport Department and the Lands Department to proactively identify sites in the vicinity of Tseung Kwan O Area 85, LOHAS Park and the Beaumount for the provision of additional parking meters and parking spaces for private cars in response to the resumption of land for development of data centre by the Government early next year, and to tackle the problem of undersupply of parking spaces in the coming few years (SKDC(TTC) Paper Nos. 309/17, 329/17 and 332/17)

186. The Chairman said that the motion was moved by Mr. CHEUNG Mei-hung and seconded by Ms. Christine FONG and Mr. CHAN Kai-wai.

187. Members noted the written replies from LandsD and TD.

Request to adopt effective measures to increase the supply of parking spaces to alleviate the shortage problem (Please refer to SKDC meeting on 7 November 2017 – SKDC(M) Paper Nos. 344/17 and 367/17)

188. Members’ views were as follows:

 There was a shortage of all types of parking spaces in Tseung Kwan O District. Apart from the area near Kwong Ming Court and Sheung Tak Estate, the parking spaces for motorcycles (in particular hourly parking spaces) at Hang Hau were also in short supply.  The parking spaces for motorcycles at shopping malls and those managed by private operators were fee-charging, whereas the parking spaces for motorcycles provided by the Government were free of charge. Given the above, some people would illegally park their motorcycles or even park on footpaths causing obstruction to pedestrians. Members 41

suggested the Government explore the feasibility of providing roadside hourly parking spaces for motorcycles at busy road sections to meet public demand and combat the problem of illegal parking.  Members requested TD to provide more parking spaces for motorcycles in the district, but suggested exploring whether the parking spaces for motorcycles at private or public car parks were already saturated to avoid mismatching of resources.  Members noted that some people made use of the space beneath flyovers for various private purposes, so they suggested TD explore the feasibility of zoning the land beneath flyovers as parking spaces for motorcycles. However, some Members said that some of the flyovers were connected to footpaths and when a motorist drove into the area beneath a flyover, pedestrians might be run over. Therefore, Members considered that TD should study the suitability of each location on a case-by-case basis to see whether it would affect the safety of other road users.  The population in Tseung Kwan O District was on the rise, but the planning of parking spaces by the Government could not cater for the population growth. The standards of the parking spaces as stated in the Hong Kong Planning Standards and Guidelines could not be met. In new residential estates, the ratio of parking spaces to residential households ranged from 1:5 to 1:7. Along with the development of Areas 66 and 68, the traffic flow in the district would be higher. Members requested TD to continue to review the planning of parking spaces in the district, actively look for sites to provide parking spaces and provide the existing number of parking spaces of all types in housing estates in the district so that TTC could discuss which areas would have a more pressing demand.  Currently, many spaces in the district were suitable for use as parking spaces for motorcycles, such as Pak Sha Wan.  Members suggested exploring the feasibility of allowing the parking spaces for motorcycles of government buildings (in particular the new government complex at Tseung Kwan O South under construction) to operate as hourly parking spaces during non-office hours.  Some members of the public had parked motorcycles at the car park in a housing estate in Tseung Kwan O South without paying any fee. Members asked the relevant personnel to take note of the above situation.  It was learnt that the Police had issued fixed penalty tickets to drivers whose motorcycles had been illegally parked in the vicinity of Tsui Lam and Po Lam recently, and it was noted that more than one motorcycle were parked in one legitimate parking space, Members asked how the Police would enforce the law in that case.  In the reply from TD, it was mentioned that only Tong Ming Court provided motorcycle parking spaces for residents’ use in the vicinity of Kwong Ming Court, whereas the parking spaces at the site of Area 68A2 to be completed in 2019 were far from Kwong Ming Court and Sheung Tak Estate. There was a serious shortage of motorcycle parking spaces near Kwong Ming Court and Sheung Tak Estate, together with the Link REIT changing the use of some motorcycle parking spaces in car parks under its management to designated use by shop operators, Members urged TD to review afresh the situation in the district and consider increasing the number of motorcycle parking spaces.

189. Mr. CHU Chi-wai of HKPF responded that TD had delineated the boundary of each motorcycle parking space when setting up parking spaces. If two motorcycles were concurrently parked in the same parking space, the Police would prosecute the driver of the motorcycle that arrived later based on observation.

190. Mr. Alan HU of TD responded that TD had noted the request of Members for increasing

the number of motorcycle parking spaces and would review the feasibility of increasing the number of motorcycle parking spaces subject to the actual circumstances of each district. In fact, TD had earlier studied the provision of motorcycle parking spaces beneath flyovers in Hang Hau District, but TD had reservation over the proposal after considering pedestrian safety. TD had earlier had a site visit with Members and indicated in its written reply that a technical study was underway. TD understood the request of Members and would take forward the proposal in a timely manner. Regarding the enquiry of Members, it would take time for TD to collect the statistics on the number of parking spaces in the district and could only provide the number of motorcycle parking spaces under the purview of TD.

191. There being no amendment or objection from Members, the Chairman declared that the motion “Request the Transport Department and the Lands Department to proactively identify sites in the vicinity of Tseung Kwan O Area 85, LOHAS Park and the Beaumount for the provision of additional parking meters and parking spaces for private cars in response to the resumption of land for development of data centre by the Government early next year, and to tackle the problem of undersupply of parking spaces in the coming few years” was endorsed. He requested TD and LandsD to follow up the views of Members, requested TD to provide the number of motorcycle parking spaces in the district and agreed to retain the above item.

(Post-meeting note of TD: Regarding the distribution of roadside parking spaces for motorcycles, Members could refer to the following website: http://www.td.gov.hk/en/transport_in_hong_kong/parking/on_street_motorcycle_parking_space s/index.html)

(Note: Please also refer to paragraphs 221 to 225.)

(13) Request for widening the road between Tai Ping Village on Po Lo Che Road and the Hiram’s Highway in Sai Kung to alleviate the traffic congestion problem (Paragraphs 190 to 192 of the minutes of last meeting)

192. Ms. Rica LAW of TD reported that TD had convened a meeting with the District Councillor of the respective constituency and the village representatives and noted their views. TD was studying the proposal for widening the road off Tai Ping Village to provide two lanes, but since the proposal would involve large-scale slope works and affect a village road, it would take time for TD to study the technical feasibility with HyD and the relevant departments. TD would report to TTC and the village representatives if there was any progress.

193. Some Members said that it had been three months since the above meeting was convened. With the arrangement of SKDO, the village representatives would have a meeting with the relevant departments to express their views and hoped that the works could be implemented as soon as possible.

194. The Chairman agreed to retain the above item.

(14) Request for conducting a comprehensive review on the traffic signal systems and pedestrian crossing facilities in Tseung Kwan O, so as to alleviate the traffic congestion problem and to protect the safety of the pedestrians who cross the roads (Paragraphs 193 to 196 of the minutes of last meeting)

195. The Chairman said that TTC had a site visit with TD on 31 October.

196. Mr. WOO Kwong-ming of TD responded to the enquiries of Members raised during the site visit according to the drawings shown at the meeting. He said that TD had a site visit with Members to three road intersections, namely the intersections between Tong Chun Street and Tong Ming Street, between Tong Chun Street and Tong Tak Street as well as between Tong Chun Street and Po Yap Road. Members requested TD to provide the calculation method of the pedestrian green time of the above intersections. The pedestrian green time comprised two phases that indicated flashing green light and steady green light respectively. The green time for the individual intersections was detailed as follows:

Intersection Distance of vertical zebra Distance of diagonal zebra crossing and the pedestrian crossing and the pedestrian green time required green time required

1. Tong Chun Street and Distance: 25.7 m Distance: 43.0 m Tong Ming Street Steady green light 7 seconds Steady green light 18 seconds Flashing green light 12 seconds Flashing green light 36 seconds Total 19 seconds Total 54 seconds 2. Tong Chun Street and Distance: 11.0 m Distance: 40.4 m Tong Tak Street Steady green light 16 seconds Steady green light 17 seconds Flashing green light 10 seconds Flashing green light 34 seconds Total 26 seconds Total 51 seconds 3. Tong Chun Street and Po Distance: 33.0 m Distance: 52.3 m Yap Road Steady green light 9 seconds Steady green light 22 seconds Flashing green light 13 seconds Flashing green light 44 seconds Total 22 seconds Total 66 seconds

As shown above, diagonal zebra crossings would increase the vehicular waiting time for traffic signals. When compared to the common design of zebra crossings, pedestrians and drivers at diagonal zebra crossings had to pay attention to the traffic conditions of the other three junctions when crossing or passing the roads to avoid vehicles pulling out or pedestrians running onto the road suddenly. As the sightline of some drivers might be blocked and were unable to observe all the locations, the risk of accidents would be increased. Based on TD’s records, there was no similar design in Hong Kong. In the light of the above factors, TD had reservation over the proposal of diagonal zebra crossings.

197. Members’ views were as follows:

 At present, few pedestrians would cross diagonally at the intersection between Tong Chun Street and Tong Tak Street. At the intersection between Tong Chun Street and Po Yap Road, passengers usually walked diagonally to and from Bauhinia Garden and Tseung Kwan O MTR Station, their direction was opposite to the direction shown in the legend indicated by TD. The legend for the intersection between Tong Chun Street and Tong Ming Street corresponded to the present situation. Members suggested TD carry out the study according to the actual pedestrian movements at road crossings in future.  As diagonal zebra crossings would increase the distance of road crossing and vehicular waiting time for traffic signals, the design was rarely adopted for use at the intersections in Hong Kong. Members suggested providing a safety zone in the middle of the zebra crossings as a waiting area for passengers in designing diagonal zebra crossings.  Generally speaking, drivers mainly paid attention to the traffic lights and roads at the front 44

without the need to take note of the other three junctions at the same time. Members considered the concern of TD unnecessary. On the contrary, TD should study whether drivers could accept the increase in waiting time for traffic signals.  TD should explore whether the long pedestrian green time was necessary. As observed, it currently only required some 10 seconds for pedestrians to cross diagonally at the above intersection. The pace of pedestrians used by TD as a point of reference for calculating the pedestrian green time seemed to be quite slow. If a faster and more reasonable pace was used for calculation, the time required might be reduced.  TD said that the provision of diagonal zebra crossings would increase the risk of road crossing by pedestrians, but currently many people would cross the road diagonally which was illegal and equally dangerous. Members asked how TD would strike a balance.  At present, some road sections with high pedestrian flow would adopt the “T” intersection design, such as the junction between Queen’s Road Central and Pedder Street. TD should make reference to the practice of other countries and adopt the design of diagonal zebra crossings at locations with high pedestrian flow. Among which, the pedestrian flows between Tong Chun Street and Tong Ming Street as well as between Tong Chun Street and Po Yap Road were extremely high.  A zebra crossing was currently provided at the centre of the intersection between Tai Kok Tsui Road and Ivy Street. During pedestrian green time, pedestrians could cross the road freely to the four corners and it was worth drawing reference from the design. Members requested TD to provide information of the intersection, such as the duration of pedestrian green time and crossing distance for Members to know the actual time required for pedestrians to cross the road.  Some members of the public had reflected that the waiting time for pedestrian green light between Tong Chun Street and Tong Tak Street was quite long and the public would get impatient and cross the road without following traffic signals. Members requested TD to adjust or adopt appropriate improvement measures. However, some Members also said that drivers had reflected that the vehicular green time there was too short.  At present, only three vehicles were able to turn to Po Hong Road from Tong Ming Street in each traffic light cycle, so drivers would speed up to pass the junction quickly, but they also needed to avoid running onto pedestrians that crossed the road illegally, which made the situation very dangerous.  TD should make an overall planning for the traffic flow and pedestrian flow of all areas in Tseung Kwan O South rather than considering the design of zebra crossings alone. TD could study diversion measures to reduce the number of vehicles entering Tong Ming Street. Taking Po Hong Street as an example, vehicles heading for Tiu Keng Leng from Po Lam along Po Hong Road must travel via Tong Ming Street or Po Yap Street instead of other roads such as Po Shun Road. As the works for Tseung Kwan O-Lam Tin Tunnel, Road P2 and the residential estates in the vicinity of Tseung Kwan O South were nearly completed, the situation at the road section would aggravate. Members urged TD to review the traffic loading of the road section and formulate the corresponding improvement measures.  In addition to the review of pedestrian crossing facilities, the captioned motion also requested a review of traffic signal systems. At that time, TTC had sought to prohibit vehicles from making right turn to Tong Ming Street from Tong Chun Street to improve traffic flow. As there were more traffic lights at Po Yap Road, it would be faster to travel to and from Hang Hau and Tiu Keng Leng via Po Shun Road instead of Po Yap Road. Together with the increase in the population of LOHAS Park and number of vehicles, the loading of the junction at Po Yap Road was increased. TD should study whether it was necessary to allow vehicles to turn left, turn right and go straight ahead at each junction (in particular Po Yap Road) of the intersection as soon as possible. Currently, some intersections in other districts only led vehicles to one or two directions, thereby reducing 45

the waiting time of drivers and alleviating traffic congestion.

198. Mr. WOO Kwong-ming of TD responded as follows:

 TD noted and would follow up with regard to Members’ views.  Members reflected the views of some people that the waiting time at Tong Chun Street and Tong Tak Street was too long. In this connection, the relevant staff of TD would study and follow up.  Members said that the traffic light cycle was too short and only three vehicles could pass the junction in each cycle. Based on past experience, the traffic light cycle should be able to allow more vehicles to pass and the relevant staff of TD would study and follow up after the meeting.  When designing the traffic lights at intersections, the major consideration of TD was to provide convenience to drivers to travel to different directions and enhance vehicular flow. TD would rarely consider prohibiting drivers from turning to a particular direction unless in the circumstances of continuous development in the district and gradual increase in traffic flow.

199. A Member clarified what Members meant was that each lane only had three vehicles passing the junction in each traffic light cycle instead of only having a total of three vehicles passing the junction in all lanes. In addition, TD planned to change Tsui Lam Road to two-way two-lane traffic, which would lead to fewer vehicles passing the junction in each lane. Nonetheless, Members hoped that TD could consider the views of Members.

200. The Chairman requested TD to respond to the consolidated views of Members and agreed to retain the above item.

(15) Request the government departments to make every effort in removing the dangerous trees on both sides of the carriageways in the District promptly, so as to ensure the safety of drivers and vehicles and road safety (Paragraphs 197 to 201 of the minutes of last meeting)

201. Members’ views were as follows:

 Members had earlier found dangerous trees at Clear Water Bay Road and reported to 1823. The case was later referred to LandsD and subsequently referred to HyD for follow-up work, which had taken about three weeks to complete the whole process. To facilitate the handling of similar cases in future, Members requested the provision of plans for TTC to know which departments were responsible for the various road sections in order to follow up the issue.  The problem of dangerous trees obstructing traffic signs was found at a number of locations such as Ta Ku Ling, Tseung Kwan O Tunnel (Po Shun Road bound), Wan Po Road outside Shaw Studios and Lion Rock Tunnel. Members considered that the Government should take the initiative and actively follow up the problem of dangerous trees, in particular those at major trunk roads, rather than relying on the case reports from District Councillors or the public.  In addition to the problem of dangerous trees, rubble was also found on some roads. Members enquired which department was responsible for clean-up and suggested a site visit to the major trunk roads with HyD.  Members enquired whether HyD was responsible for clearing the rubble from Wan Po 46

Road.

202. Mr. TSE Leung-yau of HyD responded that trees that were planted on the slopes maintained by HyD and those planted along expressways were maintained by HyD. Trees within 10 m from roads were maintained by LCSD and trees in other areas were handled by LandsD. For rubble on expressways, HyD would be responsible for cleaning up, whereas the Food and Environmental Hygiene Department (FEHD) would be responsible for cleaning up rubble on other highways and footbridges. As Wan Po Road was not an expressway, rubble on the road would be cleaned up by FEHD. If Members would like to have a site visit, it might be necessary to invite FEHD as well.

203. The Chairman suggested that cases of tree collapse should be reported to the Police if there was an emergency. In normal circumstances, reports could be made to 1823. In any case, government departments had the responsibility to initiate a clean-up if such situation was found.

204. The Chairman requested HyD to arrange a site visit with the relevant Members, he himself and the relevant government departments. With Members’ consent, the Chairman agreed to delete the above item.

(Post-meeting note: TTC had a site visit with HyD, LCSD and FEHD on 5 January 2018.)

(16) Installing parking meters in Tai Au Mun Car Park (Paragraphs 241 to 245 of the minutes of last meeting)

205. Ms. Rica LAW of TD reported that the local consultation for the proposal of installing meters for some of the parking spaces at the captioned car park (Clear Water Bay Second Beach Car Park) had been completed. TD was arranging resources for preparing the next stage of work.

206. Members welcomed the proposal and asked TD about the number of metered parking spaces under planning and its percentage of the total parking spaces, as well as when the works would commence.

207. Ms. Rica LAW of TD said that TD planned to provide parking metres at 26 parking spaces, which accounted for about one-fourth of the total parking spaces. Where resources permitted, TD endeavoured to complete the works before the swimming season next year.

(Post-meeting note of TD: The parking spaces planned to be installed with parking meters accounted for about one-sixth of the total parking spaces.)

208. As there were two car parks at Tai Au Mun, the Chairman suggested revising the item to “Installing parking meters at Clear Water Bay Second Beach Car Park”, which would be clearer. With Members’ consent, the Chairman agreed to delete the above item.

(B) The 3 Motions presented by Members (Traffic Works / Facilities)

(1) Request the Transport Department to reinstall the “turn left green arrow” signal aspect at the junction of Tsui Lam Road and Po Lam Road North, so as to increase the traffic flow thus alleviating road congestion (SKDC(TTC) Paper Nos. 307/17 and 331/17)

209. The Chairman said that the motion was moved by Mr. Stanley TAM and seconded by Mr. WAN Yuet-cheung and Mr. Alfred AU.

210. Members noted the written reply from TD.

211. Members’ views were as follows:

 Members said that the original intention of the site visit to the captioned location with TD was to study the measures to improve pedestrian safety. The pedestrian crossing at the site was divided into two portions controlled by two sets of traffic light, but the pedestrian green time of the two sets of traffic light did not correspond to each other . If the public followed the traffic signal, it would take about two minutes to cross the road. Consequently, most pedestrians did not follow the traffic signal to cross the road. Back then, Members suggested making adjustment to synchronise the green time of the two sets of traffic lights. Although adjustment had been made by TD, the overlapped green time of the two sets of traffic light was about 20 seconds only, and there were about 55 seconds during which the two sets of traffic light indicated different traffic signals. As a result, the public still crossed the road without following the traffic signal. In this regard, Members requested TD to re-adjust the two sets of traffic light to synchronise the green time.  According to the written reply from TD, after the “turn left green arrow” signal aspect had been removed, the journey time of green minibus route no. 17M was increased by one to two minutes. However, for such a busy routing, a delay of any degree could have a significant impact. The captioned “turn left green arrow” signal aspect should be able to alleviate traffic conditions, but TD had removed the traffic light signal aspect without any consultation or notification to SKDC. In this regard, Members requested TD to re-install the captioned “turn left green arrow” signal aspect.  The public would find it difficult to adapt to the frequent changes of traffic signals. Members suggested TD carefully study the implementation of the captioned proposal and consider alternative proposals, such as installing a pedestrian pushbutton to balance the interests of drivers and pedestrians using the road. Before implementing the proposal, TD should also carry out full consultation and publicity and give instructions for the public to understand the situation.  In the site visit with TD earlier, Members found that the section of Po Lam Road North from Hong Sing Garden was congested to the extent that drivers had to wait for at least two traffic light cycles to pass the junction.

212. Mr. WOO Kwong-ming of TD responded that after weighing the pros and cons, TD decided to remove the “turn left green arrow” signal aspect in order to ensure pedestrian safety. As the traffic flow was heavy after school commencement in September, TD had adjusted the vehicular green time of traffic lights, in particular prolonging the vehicular green time of traffic lights during peak hours. In the traffic survey carried out in October, TD found that the number of vehicles turning to Po Lam Road North from Tsui Lam Road was less than expected, most drivers only waited for one traffic light cycle to pass the junction. It could be seen that 48

the above adjustment could reduce the waiting time of vehicles and alleviate traffic congestion.

213. Mr. CHU Cheuk-king of TD responded that after removing the “turn left green arrow” signal aspect, TD had conducted a survey on the frequency and journey time of minibus route no. 17M and compared the survey results with the survey statistics of the same period last year. The results showed that the number of trips of the route was similar, but the journey time increased by about one minute only. It should be noted that Green Minibuses had to pass a few sets of traffic light at junctions in Po Lam, together with the picking up and alighting of a number of passengers en route, it should not be ruled out that these factors might have led to an increase in journey time. Meanwhile, TD observed at the captioned location that all departures could pass a junction within one traffic light cycle.

214. Members’ views were as follows:

 TD was studying the feasibility of changing one-way two-lane traffic at a section of Tsui Lam Road near O Tau village to two-way two-lane traffic, so as to allow vehicles to turn left to Tsui Lam Road from Po Lam Road. It was expected that more vehicles would head for Po Lam Road North via Tsui Lam Road by then. To analyse from the perspective of the captioned “turn left green arrow” signal aspect, the response from TD seemed reasonable, but TD should also get a whole picture by considering other developments in the neighbouring areas.  Members requested TD to consult the District Councillor of the respective constituency first before implementing any modifications of public transport services and road works.  Po Lam Road North was one of the major trunk roads for the public to travel to and from Tseung Kwan O, in particular many vehicles would enter Po Lam Road North when there were incidents at Tseung Kwan O Tunnel. Therefore, the removal of the “turn left green arrow” signal aspect had brought an extensive impact.  TD had earlier made a verbal promise to individual Members that the “turn left green arrow” signal aspect could be re-installed, Members hoped that TD could honour its promise.  TD responded that the removal of the “turn left green arrow” signal aspect was to ensure pedestrian safety. To this end, Members asked whether TD would remove all the “turn left green arrow” signal aspects in Hong Kong.

215. Mr. WOO Kwong-ming of TD responded that TD was very concerned with the traffic flow at Tsui Lam Road, staff of TD would also have a site visit with the relevant Members to study how to synchronise the green time of the two sets of traffic lights through adjustment.

216. There being no amendment or objection from Members, the Chairman declared that the motion was endorsed and requested TD to follow up with regard to Members’ views. He also asked TD to inform the District Councillor of the respective constituency and the local personalities of any change in future. The Chairman asked TD to contact the relevant Members for a site visit if necessary.

(2) Request for the provision of charging stations for electric vehicles at suitable sites in Tseung Kwan O (South) or the Tseung Kwan O Industrial Estate (SKDC(TTC) Paper Nos. 308/17, 327/17 and 328/17)

217. The Chairman said that the motion was moved by Mr. CHAN Kai-wai and seconded by Ms. Christine FONG and Mr. CHEUNG Mei-hung.

218. Members noted the written replies from EPD and TD.

219. Mr. Alan HU of TD responded that the provision of charging stations for electric vehicles did not fall under the purview of TD. If members of the public would like to know the details, they could refer to the website stated in the written reply.

220. There being no amendment or objection from Members, the Chairman declared that the motion was endorsed and requested EPD to follow up with regard to Members’ views.

(3) Request the Transport Department and the Lands Department to proactively identify sites in the vicinity of Tseung Kwan O Area 85, LOHAS Park and the Beaumount for the provision of additional parking meters and parking spaces for private cars in response to the resumption of land for development of data centre by the Government early next year, and to tackle the problem of undersupply of parking spaces in the coming few years (SKDC(TTC) Paper Nos. 309/17, 329/17 and 332/17)

221. The Chairman said that item (3) had been discussed together with other items and endorsed earlier.

222. Members’ views were as follows:

 The Government planned to resume the land for development of data centre and several tens of meters were involved which had a great impact on LOHAS Park area. Further to that, the monthly rental of parking spaces in the vicinity of LOHAS Park had increased to about $5,000 recently. Members therefore requested TD to illustrate the remedial measures to be adopted in response to the above land resumption plan, and requested the Police to report the prosecution figures of illegal parking at LOHAS Park area.  According to TD’s reply, TD only stated the information of existing car parks without responding to the decrease of parking spaces due to the resumption of land. Members requested TD to respond whether there were any Government, Institution or Community sites nearby for provision of meters.  Members enquired about the utilisation rates and the vacant number of parking spaces at temporary car parks at Wan O Road and Wan Po Road.

223. Mr. Alan HU of TD responded that the private development project at Tseung Kwan O Area 85 had designated and provided the necessary parking spaces and related facilities according to the Hong Kong Planning Standards and Guidelines. In addition, the temporary car parks at Wan O Road and Wan Po Road could provide parking spaces to the public in the area. In fact, TD had regularly monitored the utilisation of the above two car parks and found that parking spaces were still available. TD considered that the parking spaces in Tseung Kwan O Area 85 were sufficient. Regarding the enquiry of Members, TD could provide the statistics after the meeting.

224. Mr. CHU Chi-wai of HKPF responded that the Police could provide the prosecution figures of illegal parking at Shek Kok Road, Lohas Park Road and Wan O Road after the meeting.

225. The Chairman requested TD and HKPF to provide the statistics requested by Members.

(Note: Please also refer to paragraphs 185 to 191.)

(1) Request to adopt effective measures to increase the supply of parking spaces to alleviate the shortage problem (Please refer to SKDC meeting on 7 November 2017 – SKDC(M) Paper Nos. 344/17 and 367/17)

226. The Chairman said that the item had already been discussed earlier with another item.

XIII. Others

(A) Discussion and Matters Arising

(1) Progress on the follow up of Others by the Transport Department in response to the 5th meeting of the Traffic and Transport Committee in 2017 (Paragraphs 208 of the minutes of last meeting) (SKDC(TTC) Paper No. 310/17)

227. Members noted the paper.

228. The Chairman said that items (2) and (6) of the Discussion and Matters Arising were related to illegal parking. There being no objection from Members, the Chairman declared that the items would be discussed together.

(2) Request for installing a video camera at the crossroad between Wan Po Road and Shek Kok Road, so as to combat speeding and amber light jumping Request to tackle the illegal parking problem and the nuisance caused by the sounding of horns at the roundabout of Tong Tak Street off Beverly Garden (Paragraphs 209 to 212 of the minutes of last meeting) (6) The problem of illegal parking (Paragraphs 246 of the minutes of last meeting)

229. Members asked the Police about the follow-up work of the illegal parking black spots raised at the last meeting.

230. Mr. CHU Chi-wai of HKPF responded that the Police had actively carried out law enforcement actions at the illegal parking black spots raised by Members. In the past three months, the Police issued more than 5 000 fixed penalty tickets on average per month in Tseung Kwan O District.

231. Mr. SHEK Chi-man, Sub-unit Commander (Operations Support) (Sai Kung Division) of HKPF responded that the Police already took more stringent measures against illegal parking and issued more than 4 000 fixed penalty tickets on average per month in Sai Kung District.

232. The Chairman said that a member of the public had recently reflected to SKDC that the 51

problem of illegal parking in the vicinity of Tsui Lam Road had remained serious and endangered the safety of passers-by, but no follow-up action had been taken by the Police despite the complaint. The Police was asked to follow up the situation as soon as possible. In addition, heavy vehicles would park at the sides of Tseung Kwan O Village Public Toilet at night time which affected pedestrian safety. Regarding these illegal parking black spots, it was hoped that the Police could address the issue more proactively.

233. Mr. CHU Chi-wai of HKPF responded that the Police was very concerned about illegal parking at Tsui Lam Road, and was also aware that vehicles were parked at the road sections with double yellow line road marking. In this connection, the Police frequently took enforcement actions at Tsui Lam Road. However, drivers might not drive their vehicles away promptly and it was hope that the public could show understanding.

234. Some Members asked whether the Police would tow away the vehicle that had been parking illegally for a long time to achieve deterrent effect.

235. Mr. CHU Chi-wai of HKPF responded that according to the code of practice of the Police, if a parked vehicle caused serious obstruction or affected other road users, the Police would tow the vehicle away.

236. With Members’ consent, the Chairman agreed to delete the above item.

(3) Enquire about the long-term policy that the Government would put in place in respect of the bicycle-friendly community and the harmonious integration of “bicycle-sharing” into the community (Paragraphs 213 to 216 of the minutes of last meeting) (SKDC(TTC) Paper No. 311/17 and 312/17)

237. Members noted the written replies from HAD and the Fire Services Department.

238. With Members’ consent, the Chairman agreed to delete the above item.

(4) In response to the repeated occurrences of bicycle accidents at the Pet Garden in Area 77 near the cycle track at the Tseung Kwan O Waterfront Promenade, request the Government to review the position of the gate of the Pet Garden and look for improvement option (Paragraphs 217 to 222 of the minutes of last meeting) (SKDC(TTC) Paper Nos. 313/17 and 314/17)

239. Members noted the written replies from EPD and TD.

240. Members said that as cycling accidents repeatedly occurred at the captioned location, the relevant information should be set out in the paper on the statistics on cycling accidents submitted by the Police. Members also hoped that the relevant department could implement the proposal as soon as possible.

241. The Chairman agreed to retain the above item.

(5) Enquiry about the legislation on the regulation of electric unicycles, electric multi-cycles and motor-driven skateboards by the Government (Paragraphs 223 to 227 and 234 of the minutes of last meeting)

242. Members requested HKPF to provide the prosecution figures of electric unicycles, electric multi-cycles and motor-driven skateboards in Tseung Kwan O District on an annual basis.

243. With Members’ consent, the Chairman agreed to delete the above item and requested HKPF to provide the prosecution figures of electric unicycles, electric multi-cycles and motor-driven skateboards in Tseung Kwan O District on an annual basis.

(6) The problem of illegal parking (Paragraph 246 of the minutes of last meeting)

244. The Chairman said that item (6) had been discussed together with other items earlier.

XIV. Progress Report of Major Works of the Sai Kung District Council (Paragraphs 228 to 229 of the minutes of last meeting) (SKDC(TTC) Paper No. 315/17)

245. Members noted the paper.

XV. Report of the Working Group on Facilitation of Use of Bicycles in TKO Area (Paragraphs 230 to 235 of the minutes of last meeting) (SKDC(TTC) Paper Nos. 316/17 and 317/17)

246. Members noted the written reply from HKPF and the paper.

247. Mr. Marco CHU of SKDO reported that the working group had carried out five clearance operations from September to October 2017 covering locations including streets and cycle parking place in the district for 46 times. During the operations, a total of 283 illegally parked bicycles had been seized, among which 10 were automated rental bicycles. The working group would carry out clearance operations in Sheung Tak and Tiu Keng Leng on 17 November and in Hang Hau and Po Lam on 24 November. Furthermore, a major operator of the automated bicycle rental service (“operator”) had set up a hotline for Members and public officers to report illegal parking of rental bicycles or illegal occupation of cycle parking place. Upon receipt of complaints from the public or referred by 1823, the working group would first deploy staff to understand the situation. If automated rental bicycles of the operator were involved, the working group would refer the case to the operator, which would complete the clearance procedure in around five working days. Under this measure, the time required for clearing illegally parked bicycles was shorter than that for joint clearance operations in the past.

248. The Chairman asked HAD and TD to continue to follow up the issue.

XVI. Statistics on cycling accidents (Paragraphs 236 to 240 of the minutes of last meeting) (SKDC(TTC) Paper No. 318/17)

249. Members noted the paper. 53

250. Members said that there was an increase in the number of cyclists recently and had witnessed a number of cycling accidents with injuries. Members anticipated that the number of cycling accidents to be reported next time would surge and requested the relevant departments to adopt measures to reduce the occurrence of cycling accidents.

251. The Chairman asked the relevant departments to enhance education and publicity so as to reduce the occurrence of cycling accidents.

XVII. Any Other Business

(A) Time-table of Sai Kung District Council and Committee Meetings for 2018 (SKDC(TTC) Paper No. 319/17)

252. Members noted and endorsed the timetable of the TTC meetings for 2018.

(B) Working Group under the Traffic and Transport Committee of Sai Kung District Council

(1) Working Group on Road Safety in Sai Kung District

253. The Convener said that following the submission of the progress report (SKDC(TTC) Paper No. 235/17) to TTC in September 2017, Members were asked to note that the funding application for “Cycling and Road Safety Campaign in Sai Kung District 2017-2018” was endorsed at the meeting of the Finance and Administration Committee on 26 September 2017. The Sai Kung Bicycle and Road Safety Campaign 2017-2018 would be held on 7 January 2018 (Sunday) at the Circular Performance Stage of King Lam Estate. In addition, the district publicity education activities would be held in different locations in the district on 13 and 20 January 2018 (Saturday). The Secretariat would inform Members of the activity details in due course and hoped that Members would enthusiastically support and participate in the activity.

254. Members had expressed their views on the services of green minibuses in the district which were set out in detail as follows:

 There were quite a number of problems with minibus services in the district, including lost trips, illegal U-turn, stop-skipping, skidding, disregard for scheduled routes, and poor attitude towards passengers at termini, etc.  A Member had repeatedly written to TD to reflect the problem of frequent stop-skipping of route no. 108A, and provided information such as date, time, number plate and photo, but TD had not given any reply. The Member questioned if TD had taken any follow-up action.  Members had reflected to TD about half a year ago that route nos. 1A and 101M ran via Ying Yip Road and New Hiram’s Highway (Kowloon bound) without adhering to the scheduled routes which was definitely an inappropriate practice. However, the situation had not improved so far and TD was requested to take follow-up action as soon as possible.  At New Hiram’s Highway (Sai Kung bound), there was a sign to indicate that buses and minibuses must keep to the left lane. However, many minibus drivers did not follow the 54

sign and keep to the right lane instead. A minibus driver even requested a passenger to drop off at the right lane of New Hiram’s Highway (near Wo Mei) during traffic congestion, ending up that the passenger was run over by a motorcycle from the back when walking to the footpath. Members asked whether the instruction for minibuses to keep to the left lane was a statutory requirement or TD’s requirement. If it was TD’s requirement, Members asked TD to step up enforcement efforts and explain the requirement to the minibus industry. It was suggested that more road signs of similar nature should be provided to raise the awareness of minibus drivers. If both were negative, the road sign should be removed. In addition, Members requested TD to review the road signs at the descending section of New Hiram’s Highway and standardise the design of road sign including its style and colour.  Some minibus drivers were in poor mental and physical health conditions as they were drained of energy at work, which gave rise to a worrying situation. On an earlier occasion, a minibus driver had shouted at passengers on the minibus and ordered them to alight immediately, then the vehicle had rammed into a kerb consequent of wanton driving. At that time, the Police had suspected that the driver had taken drugs. The above situation raised concern and it was hoped that the Government could tackle the problem proactively.

255. Mr. CHU Cheuk-king of TD responded as follows:

 TD had earlier received the views of Members on route no. 108A and had recently convened a meeting with the operator concerned to review the situation. The operator told TD that the inappropriate practice was intended to increase frequency to ease passenger flow. TD had seriously reminded the operator to adhere to the existing route and operate according to the Schedule of Service. Besides, TD also suggested the operator replace their vehicles with 19-seater minibuses and increase the number of minibuses running the route. The operator was planning to deploy more 19-seater minibuses to run the route starting from early this month and purchase new vehicles. TD hoped that the operator could maintain the existing schedule after increasing the carrying capacity and adhere to the route to meet the demand of en route passengers. TD would continue to follow up with the minibus operator.  TD had reflected to the operator the views of Members on route no. 101M and urged the operator to strictly adhere to the route.  Regarding the sign indicating that buses and minibuses should keep to the left lane, TD would check with the Member concerned about the sign location and detailed information after the meeting for taking follow-up action.  Regarding the traffic accident that resulted from suspected drug-taking by the minibus driver, TD would obtain the case details from the Member concerned after the meeting for taking follow-up action. In fact, TD attached great importance to safe driving and health condition of public transport workers and always reminded the operator to ensure that drivers had sufficient rest time and maintained good physical and mental health. The Government had been promoting the message of staying healthy to professional drivers and public service vehicle drivers. TD would carry out various publicity and promotional activities every year and would continue to enhance education.

256. A Member said that route no. 108A would skip stops even during non-peak hours or with no passengers on the minibus because drivers anticipated that there were few passengers in Tiu Keng Leng, so they did not divert to the stops in Tiu Keng Leng. The skipping of stops was not due to full passenger loading. In addition, some minibus drivers made a fast U-turn at Choi Ming Street or Chui Ling Road which had violated the Road Traffic Ordinance. As he

had written to TD in June and had not received any written reply from TD so far, he had reservation over the follow-up work of TD. Besides, he suggested establishing a punishment mechanism to regulate minibus operators.

257. Mr. CHU Cheuk-king of TD responded that TD would reply to the Member concerned within this month. In fact, TD had taken follow-up action in response to the views of Members, which included reiterating to the operator that adherence to the routing was required no matter if it was during peak hours or non-peak hours. TD would continue to urge the operator to follow the requirement.

258. The Chairman said that he had taken route no. 101M this week to go to Hang Hau Road, but the minibus had not run along the route and instead had run via Ying Yip Road. He asked TD to deal with the situation as soon as possible.

(D) Dangerous tree problem

259. Members said that after the typhoon, many tree branches were blown to both sides of the roads. There were also more than 3 000 Acacia confusa trees with potential danger in the district, in particular near the road section of Clear Water Bay Road spanning from Tai Po Tsai to Silverstrand roundabout. These trees only had an average life of about 30 years and had the risk of collapse. Members requested the relevant departments to handle them promptly.

XVIII. Date of Next Meeting

260. The first meeting of 2018 would be held at 9:30 a.m. on 18 January 2018 (Thursday).

XIX. End of Meeting

261. The meeting adjourned at 5:40 p.m.

Traffic and Transport Committee Sai Kung District Council January 2018