English Private Law

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

English Private Law ENGLISH PRIVATE LAW ENGLISH PRIVATE LAW second edition Edited by Professor Andrew Burrows St Hugh’s College Oxford 1 1 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford ox2 6dp Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offi ces in Athens Auckland Bangkok Bogotá Buenos Aires Calcutta Cape Town Chennai Dar es Salaam Delhi Florence Hong Kong Istanbul Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Mumbai Nairobi Paris São Paulo Shanghai Singapore Taipei Tokyo Toronto Warsaw with associated companies in Berlin Ibadan Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries Published in the United States by Oxford University Press Inc., New York First edition published by Oxford University Press 2000 Second edition published by Oxford University Press 2007 © Oxford University Press 2007 The moral rights of the author have been asserted Database right Oxford University Press (maker) Crown copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Offi ce All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above You must not circulate this book in any other binding or cover and you must impose this same condition on any acquiror British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Data available Typeset by Cepha Imaging Private Ltd, Bangalore, India Printed in Great Britain on acid-free paper by Legoprint S.p.A. ISBN 978–0–19–922794–5 1 3 5 7 9 10 8 6 4 2 In Memory of Peter Birks 1941–2004 EDITOR Professor Andrew Burrows QC FBA St Hugh’s College Oxford CONTRIBUTORS Mr Neil Andrews Professor Mark Freedland FBA Clare College Cambridge St John’s College Oxford Professor John Armour Professor Richard Hooley Oriel College Oxford King’s College London Professor John Bell QC FBA Professor Roger Kerridge Pembroke College Cambridge University of Bristol Professor Michael Bridge Professor Ewan McKendrick London School of Economics Lady Margaret Hall Oxford Professor Adrian Briggs Professor Charles Mitchell St Edmund Hall Oxford King’s College London Professor Malcolm Clarke Professor Norman Palmer St John’s College Cambridge King’s College London Professor William Cornish QC FBA Professor Francis Reynolds QC FBA Magdalene College Cambridge Worcester College Oxford Dr Stephen Cretney QC FBA Professor Lionel Smith All Souls College Oxford McGill University Montreal Mr John Davies Mr William Swadling Brasenose College Oxford Brasenose College Oxford Dr James Edelman Professor Sir Guenter Treitel QC FBA Keble College Oxford All Souls College Oxford CONTENTS—SUMMARY Preface xxix Introduction xxxi Table of Cases xxxv Table of Legislation, Treaties and Conventions cci I SOURCES OF LAW 1. Sources of Law 3 John Bell II THE LAW OF PERSONS 2. Family 49 Stephen Cretney 3. Companies and Other Associations 149 John Armour III THE LAW OF PROPERTY 4. Property: General Principles 219 William Swadling 5. Security 403 Lionel Smith 6. Intellectual Property 497 William Cornish 7. Succession 545 Roger Kerridge IV THE LAW OF OBLIGATIONS 8. Contract: In General 623 Sir Guenter Treitel vii Contents—Summary 9. Agency 793 Francis Reynolds 10. Sale of Goods 857 Ewan McKendrick 11. Carriage of Goods by Sea 901 Francis Reynolds 12. Carriage of Goods by Air and Land 949 Malcolm Clarke 13. Insurance 981 Malcolm Clarke 14. Banking 1029 Richard Hooley 15. Employment 1081 Mark Freedland 16. Bailment 1131 Norman Palmer 17. Torts and Equitable Wrongs 1185 James Edelman and John Davies 18. Unjust Enrichment 1331 Charles Mitchell V LITIGATION 19. Insolvency 1443 Michael Bridge 20 Private International Law 1527 Adrian Briggs 21. Judicial Remedies 1617 Andrew Burrows 22. Civil Procedure 1705 Neil Andrews Index 1783 viii CONTENTS Preface xxix Introduction xxxi Table of Cases xxxv Table of Legislation, Treaties and Conventions cci I SOURCES OF LAW 1. Sources of Law A. Introduction 1.01 B. The Hierarchy of Norms 1.04 (1) European Union Law 1.05 (2) The European Convention on Human Rights 1.11 (3) The Constitution 1.15 (4) The Common Law 1.21 (5) Custom 1.24 C. Statutes and Their Interpretation 1.25 (1) The Nature of Statutes 1.25 (2) What are Judges Trying to Find Out? 1.31 (3) Where do Judges Look? 1.40 (4) Research to Discover the Purpose 1.47 (5) Sources which may be Consulted 1.50 (6) Presumptions of Interpretation 1.57 D. Precedent 1.61 (1) What is ‘Precedent’? 1.62 (2) What does ‘Precedent’ Involve? 1.65 (3) What Constitutes a ‘Precedent’? 1.66 (4) Distinguishing 1.78 (5) The Rules of Precedent in Particular Courts 1.80 E. Infl uential Sources of Law 1.100 (1) Treaties 1.101 (2) Doctrinal Legal Writing 1.102 ix Contents II THE LAW OF PERSONS 2. Family A. The Creation of Legal Family Relationships 2.01 (1) Birth 2.02 (2) Adoption 2.10 (3) Marriage 2.24 (4) Civil Partnership 2.45 (5) Cohabitation 2.52 B. The Termination of Legal Family Relationships 2.56 (1) Death 2.56 (2) Adoption 2.60 (3) Divorce and Other ‘Matrimonial Causes’ 2.61 (4) ‘Civil Partnership Causes’ 2.85 C. The Legal Consequences of Family Relationships 2.101 (1) Rights in Respect of Property 2.102 (2) Rights to Protection of the Home and Person 2.120 (3) Rights to Financial Support 2.141 (4) Rights and Duties in Respect of Children 2.161 3. Companies and Other Associations A. Introduction 3.01 (1) The Scope of the Chapter 3.01 (2) Associations in English Law: An Overview 3.02 (3) Legal Personality 3.11 (4) Corporations, Quasi-Corporations, and Unincorporated Bodies 3.29 B. Corporations 3.35 (1) Statutory and Chartered Corporations 3.35 (2) Registered Companies 3.40 (3) Limited Liability Partnerships 3.77 (4) Open-Ended Investment Companies 3.80 (5) Building Societies 3.82 (6) Industrial and Provident Societies 3.88 (7) Community Interest Companies 3.90 (8) European Economic Interest Groupings 3.91 (9) European Public Companies 3.92 C. Quasi-Corporations 3.93 (1) Trade Unions 3.93 (2) Friendly Societies 3.100 x Contents D. Unincorporated Bodies 3.103 (1) Partnerships and Limited Partnerships 3.103 (2) Unincorporated Associations 3.110 (3) Unit Trusts 3.114 (4) Pension Trusts 3.115 III THE LAW OF PROPERTY 4. Property: General Principles A. Introduction 4.01 (1) What is the Law of Property? 4.01 (2) Property Rights and Personal Rights 4.03 (3) Classifi cation 4.13 (4) The Enforcement of Property Rights 4.21 (5) The Contribution of Equity 4.22 B. Property Rights in Respect of Land 4.35 (1) Fees Simple Absolute in Possession 4.37 (2) Leases of Land 4.41 (3) Easements 4.82 (4) Profi ts à Prendre 4.96 (5) Rentcharges 4.97 (6) Restrictive Covenants 4.98 (7) Contracts to Purchase Estates in Land 4.106 (8) Options to Purchase 4.109 (9) The Equity of Redemption 4.111 (10) Charges 4.113 (11) Licences: A Doubtful Case 4.114 C. Property Rights in Respect of Goods 4.129 (1) Title 4.130 (2) Leases of Personalty 4.132 (3) Other Bailments 4.134 (4) Equities of Redemption 4.135 (5) Security Devices 4.136 (6) Other Covenants 4.138 D. Rights Held on Trust 4.140 (1) The Trust 4.141 (2) The Juridical Effect of Placing Rights Behind a Trust 4.145 (3) Why Create a Trust? 4.154 (4) Classifi cation of Trusts 4.157 (5) Declared (Express) Trusts 4.164 (6) Duties of Trustees of Declared Trusts 4.210 xi Contents (7) Powers of Trustees of Declared Trusts 4.227 (8) Trusts for Purposes 4.228 (9) Trusts Arising for Reasons Other than Declarations of Trust 4.293 (10) The Coming to an End of Trusts 4.345 E. Co-ownership 4.352 (1) Types of Co-ownership 4.354 (2) Choosing Between Types of Co-ownership 4.364 (3) Creation of the Different Tenancies 4.366 (4) Severance of Joint Tenancies 4.373 (5) Rights of Co-owners Inter Se 4.383 (6) Statutory Reforms of Co-owned Titles to Land: 1925 4.386 (7) Statutory Reforms of Co-owned Titles to Land: 1996 4.394 (8) Disputes over Co-owned land 4.397 F. Creation of Property Rights 4.398 (1) Consent 4.401 (2) Wrongs 4.406 (3) Unjust Enrichment 4.413 (4) Other Events 4.414 G. Transfer of Property Rights 4.438 (1) Titles to Land 4.439 (2) Titles to Goods 4.449 (3) Disclaimer of Rights 4.461 H. Extinction of Property Rights 4.462 (1) Destruction of the Subject-Matter of the Right 4.463 (2) Lapse of Time 4.469 (3) Satisfaction of Judgment in Conversion 4.478 (4) Inferior Title Sold to Good Faith Purchaser for Value 4.479 (5) Encumbered Title Sold to Good Faith Purchaser for Value 4.485 (6) Obsolete Restrictive Covenants 4.501 (7) Extinction of Easements and Restrictive Covenants where Dominant and Servient Tenements Come into the Same Hands 4.502 (8) Abandonment 4.503 (9) Determination of Leases of Land 4.506 5.
Recommended publications
  • Equitable Allowances Or Restitutionary Measures for Dishonest Assistance and Knowing Receipt
    Whayman D. Equitable allowances or restitutionary measures for dishonest assistance and knowing receipt. Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 2017, 68(2), 181–202. Copyright: © Queen's University School of Law. This is the final version of an article published in Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly by Queen's University School of Law. DOI link to article: https://nilq.qub.ac.uk/index.php/nilq/article/view/34 Date deposited: 10/08/2017 Newcastle University ePrints - eprint.ncl.ac.uk NILQ 68(2): 181–202 Equitable allowances or restitutionary measures for dishonest assistance and knowing receipt DEREK WHAYMAN * Lecturer in Law, Newcastle University Abstract This article considers the credit given to dishonest assistants and knowing recipients in claims for disgorgement, with greater focus on dishonest assistance. Traditionally, equity has awarded a parsimonious ‘just allowance’ for work and skill. The language of causation in Novoship (UK) Ltd v Mikhaylyuk [2014] EWCA Civ 908 suggests a more generous restitutionary approach which is at odds with the justification given: prophylaxis. This tension makes the law incoherent. Moreover, the bar to full disgorgement has been set too high, such that the remedy is unavailable in practice. Therefore, even if the restitutionary approach is affirmed, it must be revised. Keywords: disgorgement; equitable allowances; remoteness of gain; dishonest assistance; knowing receipt. isgorgement in equity has become more widely available. It is familiar as against a fiduciary where the profits of the defaulting fiduciary’s efforts are appropriated to the pDrincipal, seen in cases such as Boardman v Phipps .1 In Novoship (UK) Ltd v Mikhaylyuk , the Court of Appeal held that disgorgement is available in principle against accessories (meaning dishonest assistants and knowing recipients) to a breach of fiduciary duty.
    [Show full text]
  • The Overlapping of Legal Concepts a Legal Realist Approach to the Classification of Private Law
    THE OVERLAPPING OF LEGAL CONCEPTS A LEGAL REALIST APPROACH TO THE CLASSIFICATION OF PRIVATE LAW by DAVID SALMONS A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Birmingham Law School College of Arts and Law University of Birmingham Summer 2011 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT The main aim of this research is two-fold; firstly, these chapters will seek to demonstrate the unreliability of theoretical or abstract approaches to legal reasoning in describing the law. Secondly, rather than merely providing a deconstruction of previous attempts to classify private law, the chapters attempt to construct an overlapping approach to classification. This represents a new way of classifying private law, which builds on the foundations of the lessons of legal realism and explains how classification can accommodate overlaps to assist in identifying the core elements of private law reasoning. Following the realist tradition, the thesis argues for narrower formulations of the concepts of property, contract and tort. It is then argued that within these narrower concepts, the law is made more predictable and clearer.
    [Show full text]
  • 100 Years: a Century of Song 1970S
    100 Years: A Century of Song 1970s Page 130 | 100 Years: A Century of song 1970 25 Or 6 To 4 Everything Is Beautiful Lady D’Arbanville Chicago Ray Stevens Cat Stevens Abraham, Martin And John Farewell Is A Lonely Sound Leavin’ On A Jet Plane Marvin Gaye Jimmy Ruffin Peter Paul & Mary Ain’t No Mountain Gimme Dat Ding Let It Be High Enough The Pipkins The Beatles Diana Ross Give Me Just A Let’s Work Together All I Have To Do Is Dream Little More Time Canned Heat Bobbie Gentry Chairmen Of The Board Lola & Glen Campbell Goodbye Sam Hello The Kinks All Kinds Of Everything Samantha Love Grows (Where Dana Cliff Richard My Rosemary Grows) All Right Now Groovin’ With Mr Bloe Edison Lighthouse Free Mr Bloe Love Is Life Back Home Honey Come Back Hot Chocolate England World Cup Squad Glen Campbell Love Like A Man Ball Of Confusion House Of The Rising Sun Ten Years After (That’s What The Frijid Pink Love Of The World Is Today) I Don’t Believe In If Anymore Common People The Temptations Roger Whittaker Nicky Thomas Band Of Gold I Hear You Knocking Make It With You Freda Payne Dave Edmunds Bread Big Yellow Taxi I Want You Back Mama Told Me Joni Mitchell The Jackson Five (Not To Come) Black Night Three Dog Night I’ll Say Forever My Love Deep Purple Jimmy Ruffin Me And My Life Bridge Over Troubled Water The Tremeloes In The Summertime Simon & Garfunkel Mungo Jerry Melting Pot Can’t Help Falling In Love Blue Mink Indian Reservation Andy Williams Don Fardon Montego Bay Close To You Bobby Bloom Instant Karma The Carpenters John Lennon & Yoko Ono With My
    [Show full text]
  • THE MODERN LAW of CONTRACT, Eighth Edition
    The Modern Law of Contract Eighth Edition Written by a leading author and lecturer with over thirty years’ experience teaching and examining contract law, The Modern Law of Contract continues to equip students with a clear and logical introduction to contract law. Exploring all of the recent developments and case decisions in the field of contract law, it combines a meticulous examination of authorities and commentar- ies with a modern contextual approach. An ideal accessible introduction to con- tract law for students coming to legal study for the first time, this leading textbook offers straightforward explanations of all of the topics found on an undergraduate or GDL contract law module. At the same time, coverage of a variety of theoretical approaches: economic, sociological and empirical encourages reflective thought and critical analysis. New features include: boxed chapter summaries, which help to consolidate learning and understanding; additional ‘For thought’ think points throughout the text where students are asked to consider ‘what if’ scenarios; new diagrams to illustrate principles and facilitate the understanding of concepts and interrelationships; new Key Case close-ups designed to help students identify key cases within contract law and improve their understanding of the facts and context of each case; a Companion Website with half-yearly updates; chapter-by-chapter Multiple Choice Questions; a Flashcard glossary; contract law skills advice; PowerPoint slides of the diagrams within the book; and sample essay questions; new, attractive two-colour text design to improve presentation and help consolidate learning. Clearly written and easy to use, this book enables undergraduate students of contract law to fully engage with the topic and gain a profound understanding of this pivotal area.
    [Show full text]
  • BBC 4 Listings for 14 – 20 February 2009 Page 1 of 3
    BBC 4 Listings for 14 – 20 February 2009 Page 1 of 3 SATURDAY 14 FEBRUARY 2009 producer Cameron Mackintosh, Nicholas Parsons, Ed Stewart how the classic novel Wuthering Heights allows us to step inside and Kit and the Widow. other minds and understand the world from different points of SAT 19:00 Men, Women and Clothes (b00hn6fz) view, and she wonders whether the new digital revolution could Facing the Elements threaten the values of classic reading. SAT 02:25 Iran and Britain (b00hq1w7) 1950s fashion series. Doris Langley Moore shows how [Repeat of broadcast at 22:00 today] protection from the elements has always been of secondary SUN 02:05 How Reading Made Us Modern (b00hk7mx) importance. We see how attitudes to covering up changed English literature professor John Mullan explores the dramatic completely in the 1920s, when the acquisition of a suntan SAT 03:25 New Town (b00hq1w5) increase in reading which took place in 18th-century Britain, as became de rigueur for those serious about style. [Repeat of broadcast at 21:00 today] it went from being the preserve of the rich to the national pastime it is today. SAT 19:25 Wives and Daughters (b00hq1w3) In 1695 a tiny amendment to the British constitution allowed Episode 2 SUNDAY 15 FEBRUARY 2009 for a flood of publications, without which Britain would be almost unrecognisable. This was the era that gave us the first Adaptation of Elizabeth Gaskell's novel which follows the SUN 19:00 Stephen Fry in America (b00flx59) ever magazines, newspapers and perhaps most vitally, the novel.
    [Show full text]
  • Finding Our Way: Secured Transactions and Corporate Bankruptcy Law and Policy in America and England
    Sarah Paterson Finding our way: secured transactions and corporate bankruptcy law and policy in America and England Article (Accepted version) (Refereed) Original citation: Paterson, Sarah (2018) Finding our way: secured transactions and corporate bankruptcy law and policy in America and England. Journal of Corporate Law Studies. ISSN 1473-5970 DOI: 10.1080/14735970.2018.1432010 © 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/86657/ Available in LSE Research Online: April 2018 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s final accepted version of the journal article. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. Finding Our Way: Secured Transactions and Corporate Bankruptcy Law and Policy in America and England* I Introduction This article is about the way in which England and America have historically sought to balance two sets of policy considerations, and the implications of the evolutionary history for current reform debates.
    [Show full text]
  • Property Law Notes
    Property Law Notes Part 1 out of 2 [125 pages] Contents: Definitions: What is Property? Distribution of Property Taxonomy Possession + Interference with Possession + Relativity of Title Ownership Tenure and Estates Introduction to Freehold & Leasehold Covenants Personal Property Rights: Security Interests Fixtures and Mixtures Sale of Goods Creation and Transfer + Formalities + Conveyancing Priorities at Common Law + Priorities in Equity Easements and Profits 1 What is Property? Right in rem = a right to a thing which is enforceable generally against other members of society. Right in personam = a right to a thing which is enforceable only against specific persons. The division between property rights and personal rights is based on the enforceability of that right. Wide definition – assignability of rights: Most rights in rem and rights in personam can be transferred to others, and most have value. If can be assigned to third parties, indicates they might be proprietary in nature. A right that can be transferred to others may have value because it can be sold. These rights count as assets. Can consciously/actively assign property rights, or might be assigned to a third party by operation of law: o Death (intestacy provisions or will) o Bankruptcy (Insolvency Act, property is assigned/transferred to trustee in bankruptcy) o Wealth Some in rem rights can’t be assigned so wouldn’t be recognised as proprietary under the wider definition of assignability. Some things are in rem proprietary rights that can’t be assigned, e.g. non-assignable lease, easement (if you don’t have the DT or ST). One way to destroy an in rem right is to destroy the thing to which it relates.
    [Show full text]
  • Proprietary Estoppel
    UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST INDIES FACULTY OF LAW REAL PROPERTY I Worksheet 5 2018-2019 Proprietary Estoppel LEARNING OBJECTIVES By the end of this lesson, you should be able to:- Explain and apply the principles governing the doctrine of proprietary estoppel Required General Readings: Sampson Owusu, Commonwealth Caribbean Land Law, Ch. 6 and Ch. 7 Kevin and Susan Gray, Elements of Land Law (5th ed.), Chap. 9.2, pp. 1196 -1256 Neuberger, “The Stuffing of Minerva’s Owl? Taxonomy and Taxidermy in Equity” [2009] CLJ 537. Timothy Fancourt, QC, “Are All Estoppels Alike” available from https://www.chba.org.uk/for-members/library/overseas-seminars/3-non-financial THE DOCTRINE OF PROPRIETARY ESTOPPEL • The term estoppel is used to refer to circumstances in which a person is prevented or estopped from denying the truth of a particular matter of fact or law - Roger Smith, Introduction to Land Law (p.30). • A proprietary estoppel may arise in the following cases: (i) Incomplete gifts (ii) Reasonable (common) expectation of acquisition of right (iii) Unilateral Mistake The equitable doctrine of proprietary estoppel intervenes to “restrain (or estop) the assertion of legal entitlement on the grounds of conscience.”1 According to Walker LJ in Gillett v Holt [2001] Ch. 210 at 255, “[t]he fundamental principle that equity is concerned to prevent unconscionable conduct permeates all elements of the doctrine.” The doctrine of proprietary estoppel operates to prevent the revocation of a right held by one person (B) based on an assurance given by another (A) which the first person (B) relied on and was led to believe was permanent.2 1 Ridall, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Level 6 - Unit 5 – Equity & Trusts Suggested Answers – January 2011
    LEVEL 6 - UNIT 5 – EQUITY & TRUSTS SUGGESTED ANSWERS – JANUARY 2011 Note to Candidates and Tutors: The purpose of the suggested answers is to provide students and tutors with guidance as to the key points students should have included in their answers to the January 2011 examinations. The suggested answers set out a response that a good (merit/distinction) candidate would have provided. The suggested answers do not for all questions set out all the points which students may have included in their responses to the questions. Students will have received credit, where applicable, for other points not addressed by the suggested answers. Students and tutors should review the suggested answers in conjunction with the question papers and the Chief Examiners’ reports which provide feedback on student performance in the examination. SECTION A 1(a) A decree of specific performance is a court order instructing a party to a contract to perform their obligations under that contract. Failure to comply is contempt of court. It is a precondition of a decree of specific performance that the remedy at law is inadequate. That remedy is generally damages. This is consistent with the role of equity within our legal system, as it developed to provide remedies for those who could not receive the assistance they required through the common law courts. Whether damages are an adequate remedy will depend on the subject matter of the contract. If a contract is for the sale and purchase of an item that is unique, no amount of damages will be able to make up for the fact that the purchaser will no longer receive the item they contracted for.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents Welcome to This Week’S Edition 1
    PLANNING, ENVIRONMENT & PROPERTY NEWSLETTER 30 April 2020 INTRODUCTION Jonathan Darby Contents Welcome to this week’s edition 1. INTRODUCTION of our Planning, Environment Jonathan Darby and Property newsletter. It has been another busy week for the 2. PROMISES TO KEEP: RECENT group, with the launch of our DEVELOPMENTS IN THE LAW OF new webinar series “39 from 39”. The inaugural PROPRIETARY ESTOPPEL Planning law episode featured Richard Harwood David Sawtell QC, Celina Colquhoun and Daniel Stedman Jones discussing three Supreme Court cases, whilst 3. AIR QUALITY AND LOCKDOWN: SHORT today’s episode featured Damian Falkowski TERM HOPE BUT LONG TERM and David Sawtell on the topic of “Exiting the CHALLENGES lockdown – property and development disputes Rose Grogan and their resolution”. They have proven to be very popular and we have found this new format to 5. RIVERS OF SEWAGE, BLOATED MARES be an excellent means of connecting with many AND REDUNDANT SEX TOYS – LOCK familiar faces, as well as some new ones. Watch DOWN BITES? this space (https://www.39essex.com/category/ Stephen Tromans QC seminars/) for further episodes during the weeks commencing 11th and 18th May. As ever, we very 6. TILTED1? much welcome feedback, as well as suggestions Celina Colquhoun for future topics for discussion. 11. SIZEWELL C, OPPOSITION AND In this week’s edition we have articles from David PLANNING PROCESS Sawtell (on recent developments in the law of Stephen Tromans QC proprietary estoppel); Rose Grogan (on the impact of lockdown on air quality and some issues that 12. CONTRIBUTORS PLANNING, ENVIRONMENT & PROPERTY 30 April 2020 Page 2 may be coming down the line once the current number of recent decisions, even where the fact restrictions are lifted); Stephen Tromans QC pattern in the instant case they are advising on (first, revisiting his thoughts on the likely rise in does not involve a family farm.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining the Employment Relationship
    Defining the Employment relationship Who is an ‘employee’? - There can be no binding precedent for any category of workers. - Use existing case-law to draw analogies between similar categories of worker. - Different criteria will apply depending on the context e.g. vicarious liability, health and safety, social security, income tax. Statutory definition Employment Rights Act 1996, section 230 - (1) ‘Employee’ = individual who has entered into or works under a contract of employment. - (2) ‘Contract of employment’ = a contract of service/apprenticeship, whether express or implied, and whether oral or in writing. - ‘Worker’ defined in (3) ‘Contract gateway’? ERA + common law à employee status turns on establishing a contract of service, as opposed to a contract for services (which indicates the person is performing work as an independent contractor). Common law ‘3 step’ approach used by Mckenna J in Ready Mixed Concrete: 1. Is there a ‘wage-work’ bargain? 2. Has the employee agreed that he will be subject to the employer’s control to a sufficient degree? -Control = necessary but not determinative. -Nowadays, with modern working conditions – it cannot be sole indicator. -But still very important: - Humberstone v Northern Timber Mills: “does ultimate authority over the man in the performance of his work reside in the employer so that he was subject to the latter’s order and directions”. -Lack of control does not negate employee status (e.g. skilled workers – may have very little supervision yet still be employees) -Extensive control does not guarantee employee status (Queensland Stations, approved in Ready Mixed Concrete). 3. Are the other provisions of the contract consistent with it being a contract of service? But, there is no decisive test for employee status Courts have considered following factors: - Whose business it is o Montreal v Montreal Locomotive – Fourfold test involving control, ownership of tools, chance of profit and risk of loss.
    [Show full text]
  • So Obvious It Goes Without Saying? an Argument for the Singaporean Approach to the Implication of Terms in Fact
    So Obvious It Goes Without Saying? An Argument for the Singaporean Approach to the Implication of Terms in Fact Mitchell Allan Heslip A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the degree of Bachelor of Laws (with Honours) University of Otago October 2017 1 Acknowledgements I would like to thank: Dr Simon Connell, my supervisor, for introducing me to this fascinating area of law. His guidance and insight on this topic were invaluable to me and greatly appreciated; And my friends, family and flat mates this year, for putting up with me through this. 2 Table of Contents I Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 4 II The Classical Approach .............................................................................................................. 6 A Interpretation ........................................................................................................................... 6 B Implication ............................................................................................................................... 8 1 The classical approach to implication summarised by the threefold framework ............... 11 III The Contemporary Position: Changing Tides and the Great Divergence................................ 13 A Interpretation: 1990’s – Present: Changing Tides ................................................................. 13 1 ICS and the modern approach to contract interpretation ...................................................
    [Show full text]