DOCSLIB.ORG

Parulidae Species Tree

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Parulidae Species Tree Parulidae I Ovenbird, Seiurus aurocapilla Seiurinae Worm-eating Warbler, Helmitheros vermivorum Helmitherinae Northern Waterthrush, Parkesia noveboracensis Louisiana Waterthrush, Parkesia motacilla Black-and-white Warbler, Mniotilta varia Vermivorinae Prothonotary Warbler, Protonotaria citrea Swainson’s Warbler, Limnothlypis swainsonii Bachman’s Warbler, Vermivora bachmanii Golden-winged Warbler, Vermivora chrysoptera Blue-winged Warbler, Vermivora cyanoptera Crescent-chested Warbler, Oreothlypis superciliosa Flame-throated Warbler, Oreothlypis gutturalis Tennessee Warbler, Leiothlypis peregrina Orange-crowned Warbler, Leiothlypis celata Colima Warbler, Leiothlypis crissalis Lucy’s Warbler, Leiothlypis luciae Nashville Warbler, Leiothlypis ruficapilla Geothlypinae Virginia’s Warbler, Leiothlypis virginiae Connecticut Warbler, Oporornis agilis Semper’s Warbler, Leucopeza semperi MacGillivray’s Warbler, Geothlypis tolmiei Mourning Warbler, Geothlypis philadelphia Kentucky Warbler, Geothlypis formosa Gray-crowned Yellowthroat, Geothlypis poliocephala Masked Yellowthroat, Geothlypis aequinoctialis Black-lored Yellowthroat, Geothlypis auricularis Southern Yellowthroat, Geothlypis velata Black-polled Yellowthroat, Geothlypis speciosa Olive-crowned Yellowthroat, Geothlypis semiflava Baird’s Yellowthroat, Geothlypis bairdi Chiriqui Yellowthroat, Geothlypis chiriquensis Belding’s Yellowthroat, Geothlypis beldingi Bahama Yellowthroat, Geothlypis rostrata Common Yellowthroat, Geothlypis trichas Altamira Yellowthroat, Geothlypis flavovelata Hooded Yellowthroat, Geothlypis nelsoni Parulinae Basileuterinae Parulidae II Seiurinae Helmitherinae Geothlypinae Whistling Warbler, Catharopeza bishopi Plumbeous Warbler, “Dendroica” plumbea Elfin-woods Warbler, “Dendroica” angelae Parulinae Arrowhead Warbler, “Dendroica” pharetra Hooded Warbler, Wilsonia citrina American Redstart, Setophaga ruticilla Kirtland’s Warbler, Setophaga kirtlandii Cape May Warbler, Setophaga tigrina B Cerulean Warbler, Setophaga cerulea Northern Setophaga, Setophaga americana Tropical Setophaga, Setophaga pitiayumi Magnolia Warbler, Setophaga magnolia Setophaga castanea A Bay-breasted Warbler, C Blackburnian Warbler, Setophaga fusca Yellow Warbler, Setophaga petechia Blackpoll Warbler, Setophaga striata Chestnut-sided Warbler, Setophaga pensylvanica Black-throated Blue Warbler, Setophaga caerulescens Palm Warbler, Setophaga palmarum Pine Warbler, Setophaga pinus D Olive-capped Warbler, Setophaga pityophila Yellow-throated Warbler, Setophaga dominica Bahama Warbler, Setophaga flavescens Myrtle Warbler, Setophaga coronata Audubon’s Warbler, Setophaga auduboni Goldman’s Warbler, Setophaga goldmani Prairie Warbler, Setophaga discolor Vitelline Warbler, Setophaga vitellina Adelaide’s Warbler, Setophaga adelaidae Setophaga subita E Barbuda Warbler, St. Lucia Warbler, Setophaga delicata Black-throated Gray Warbler, Setophaga nigrescens Grace’s Warbler, Setophaga graciae Townsend’s Warbler, Setophaga townsendi Hermit Warbler, Setophaga occidentalis Black-throated Green Warbler, Setophaga virens Golden-cheeked Warbler, Setophaga chrysoparia Myiothlypis Euthlypis Basileuterinae Basileuterus Cardellina Myioborus Parulidae III Seiurinae Helmitherinae Geothlypinae Parulinae Roraiman Warbler, Myiothlypis roraimae Two-banded Warbler, Myiothlypis bivittata Golden-bellied Warbler / Cuzco Warbler, Myiothlypis chrysogaster White-lored Warbler, Myiothlypis conspicillata Gray-throated Warbler, Myiothlypis cinereicollis Russet-crowned Warbler, Myiothlypis coronata Gray-and-gold Warbler, Myiothlypis fraseri Santa Marta Warbler, Myiothlypis basilica Citrine Warbler, Myiothlypis luteoviridis White-striped Warbler, Myiothlypis leucophrys Flavescent Warbler, Myiothlypis flaveola White-browed Warbler / White-rimmed Warbler, Myiothlypis leucoblephara ??Gray-headed Warbler, Myiothlypis griseiceps Buff-rumped Warbler, Myiothlypis fulvicauda Riverbank Warbler, Myiothlypis rivularis Black-crested Warbler, Myiothlypis nigrocristata Basileuterinae Pale-legged Warbler, Myiothlypis signata Fan-tailed Warbler, Euthlypis lachrymosa Rufous-capped Warbler, Basileuterus rufifrons Golden-browed Warbler, Basileuterus belli Black-cheeked Warbler, Basileuterus melanogenys ?Pirre Warbler, Basileuterus ignotus Golden-crowned Warbler, Basileuterus culicivorus Black-eared Warbler, Basileuterus melanotis Tacarcuna Warbler, Basileuterus tacarcunae Three-banded Warbler, Basileuterus trifasciatus Three-striped Warbler, Basileuterus tristriatus Yungas Warbler, Basileuterus punctipectus Canada Warbler, Cardellina canadensis Wilson’s Warbler, Cardellina pusilla Red-faced Warbler, Cardellina rubrifrons Red Warbler, Cardellina rubra Pink-headed Warbler, Cardellina versicolor Painted Whitestart, Myioborus pictus Slate-throated Whitestart, Myioborus miniatus Brown-capped Whitestart, Myioborus brunniceps Yellow-crowned Whitestart, Myioborus flavivertex White-fronted Whitestart, Myioborus albifrons Golden-fronted Whitestart, Myioborus ornatus Spectacled Whitestart, Myioborus melanocephalus Collared Whitestart, Myioborus torquatus Paria Whitestart, Myioborus pariae White-faced Whitestart, Myioborus albifacies Saffron-breasted Whitestart, Myioborus cardonai Tepui Whitestart, Myioborus castaneocapilla Sources: Guti´errez-Pinto et al. (2012), Klein et al. (2004), Klicka et al. (2007), Lovette et al. (1999), Lovette and Bermingham (2002), Lovette and Hochachka (2006), Lovette et al. (2010), P´erez-Em´an (2005), Rabosky and Lovette (2008), Weir et al. (2009)..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Acoustic Monitoring of Night-Migrating Birds: a Progress Report
    Acoustic Monitoring of Night-Migrating Birds: A Progress Report William R. Evans Kenneth V. Rosenberg Abstract—This paper discusses an emerging methodology that to give regular vocalizations in night migration are the vireos uses electronic technology to monitor vocalizations of night-migrat- (Vireonidae), flycatchers (Tyrannidae), and orioles (Icterinae). ing birds. On a good migration night in eastern North America, If a monitoring protocol is consistently maintained, an array thousands of call notes may be recorded from a single ground-based, of microphone stations can provide information on how the audio-recording station, and an array of recording stations across a species composition and number of vocal migrants vary across region may serve as a “recording net” to monitor a broad front of time and space. Such data have application for monitoring migration. Data from pilot studies in Florida, Texas, New York, and avian populations and identifying their migration routes. In British Columbia illustrate the potential of this technique to gather addition, detection and classification of distinctive call-types information that cannot be gathered by more conventional methods, is possible with computers (Mills 1995; Taylor 1995), thus such as mist-netting or diurnal counts. For example, the Texas information on bird populations might be gained automati- station detected a major migration of grassland sparrows, and a cally. In this paper, we summarize the current state of station in British Columbia detected hundreds of Swainson’s knowledge for identifying night-flight calls to species; present Thrushes; both phenomena were not detected with ground monitor- selected results from four ongoing studies that are monitoring ing efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • Landbird Habitat Conservation Strategy – 2020 Revision
    Upper Mississippi / Great Lakes Joint Venture Landbird Habitat Conservation Strategy – 2020 Revision Upper Mississippi / Great Lakes Joint Venture Landbird Habitat Conservation Strategy – 2020 Revision Joint Venture Landbird Committee Members: Kelly VanBeek, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Migratory Birds), Co-chair Chris Tonra, The Ohio State University, Co-chair Mohammed Al-Saffar, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Joint Venture) Dave Ewert, American Bird Conservancy Erin Gnass Giese, University of Wisconsin – Green Bay Allisyn-Marie Gillet, Indiana Dept. of Natural Resources Shawn Graff, American Bird Conservancy Jim Herkert, Illinois Audubon Sarah Kendrick, Missouri Dept. of Conservation Mark Nelson, U.S.D.A. Forest Service Katie O’Brien, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Migratory Birds) Greg Soulliere, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Joint Venture) Wayne Thogmartin, U.S. Geological Survey Mike Ward, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Tom Will, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Migratory Birds) Recommended citation: Soulliere, G. J., M. A. Al-Saffar, K. R. VanBeek, C. M. Tonra, M. D. Nelson, D. N. Ewert, T. Will, W. E. Thogmartin, K. E. O’Brien, S. W. Kendrick, A. M. Gillet, J. R. Herkert, E. E. Gnass Giese, M. P. Ward, and S. Graff. 2020. Upper Mississippi / Great Lakes Joint Venture Landbird Habitat Conservation Strategy – 2020 Revision. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Bloomington, Minnesota, USA. Cover photo: Whip-poor-will, by Ian Sousa-Cole. TABLE OF CONTENTS STRATEGY SUMMARY ..................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • The Value of Acoustic Technologies for Monitoring Bird Migration
    The value of acoustic technologies for monitoring bird migration Andrew Farnsworth, Conservation Science Program Monitoring using acoustic technologies 1) Informing traditional auditory monitoring 2) Monitoring species that are difficult to survey. 3) Monitoring migrants by recording flight-calls. Many species produce flight calls: unique vocalizations, varying in frequency, duration, and pattern; primarily given in sustained flight, presumably for communication. Dickcissel Black-billed Cuckoo Red-breasted Nuthatch Bobolink White-throated Sparrow Swainson’s Thrush Evans and O’Brien (2002) Recording flight calls: nocturnal Recording flight calls: diurnal Recording flight calls: captive birds Designed by M. Lanzone (Lanzone and Farnsworth submitted) Recording Type Projects: Captive Free-flying Offshore Recording Locations DoD Sites American Redstart Raven birds.cornell.edu/Raven XBAT www.xbat.org Traditional analysis Syllabic measurements Modulation Sweep Spectral and temporal measurements BBWA_fig Maximum Bandwidth Minimum Duration New ways of representing flight-calls • Spectrogram Cross Correlation – acoustic (particularly “syllabic”) similarity among species – identify flight-call “template” for each species that best correlates with remaining calls • ACOUSTAT/XBAT – treat spectrogram data as probability distributions – characterize using order statistics (e.g. median) K. Cortopassi Swainson’s Thrush variation • Learn the variation in a species you hear often • Note the differences in trailing modulation, duration, and initial upsweep in these calls Low frequency, thrush-like calls BITH GCTH HETH SWTH VEER WOTH BAOR BUOR OROR RHWO BOBO WEME EAME MOBL EABL • These calls exhibit a wide array of frequencies, degrees of modulation, sweeps, and shapes. However, when heard in passing, these identifications can be challenging. “Zeep” Complex Blackburnian Blackpoll Cerulean Connecticut Louisiana Waterthrush Magnolia Worm-eating Yellow • Similarity in duration and “shape” for all of these species; slight differences in frequency ranges, degree and depth of modulation.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    INTRODUCTION UC-Stallcup TEXT.indd 1 1/23/14 11:30 AM This contribution to the California Natural History Guide Series of the University of California Press follows a long tradi- tion of books that explain, explore, and celebrate the natural riches of California and beyond. Our intent is to tell beginning birders, or curious naturalists, the how, what, when, where, and why of birding. Because birds are so mobile, some individuals of most spe- cies can wander far from their natal homes and appear any- where. Here we have tried to include only those species most likely to be seen along the coast, from Big Sur to the Oregon border. This is not a field guide to bird identification, but a field guide to the birds themselves. Birding is a word that encompasses many concepts. For some, the activity of searching for and observing birds is a clear window into the natural world, an affirmation of its beauty and its peacefulness. To others, birding is a delightful diversion from the hectic or perhaps boring daily routine of the mod- ern world— providing calm amid the chaos. Birds are nature’s ambassadors, connecting us through their ancient lineage to evolution’s astonishing creativity and offering us some guid- ance, through our study of their habitat needs, in our steward- ship of the Earth. Some people have found the wonders of birds to be the perfect antidote to sadness or loneliness, or a path to comradeship with kindred spirits; others consider the complex- ities of identification or behavior an intellectual challenge.
    [Show full text]
  • Partners in Flight Landbird Conservation Plan 2016
    PARTNERS IN FLIGHT LANDBIRD CONSERVATION PLAN 2016 Revision for Canada and Continental United States FOREWORD: A NEW CALL TO ACTION PROJECT LEADS Kenneth V. Rosenberg, Cornell Lab of Ornithology Judith A. Kennedy, Environment and Climate Change Canada The Partners in Flight (PIF) 2016 Landbird Conservation Plan Revision comes Randy Dettmers, United States Fish and Wildlife Service at an important time in conserving our heritage of an abundant and diverse Robert P. Ford, United States Fish and Wildlife Service avifauna. There is now an urgent need to bridge the gap between bird Debra Reynolds, United States Fish and Wildlife Service conservation planning and implementation. AUTHORS John D. Alexander, Klamath Bird Observatory Birds and their habitats face unprecedented threats from climate change, Carol J. Beardmore, Sonoran Joint Venture; United States Fish and Wildlife Service poorly planned urban growth, unsustainable agriculture and forestry, and Peter J. Blancher, Environment and Climate Change Canada (emeritus) a widespread decline in habitat quantity and quality. The spectacle of bird Roxanne E. Bogart, United States Fish and Wildlife Service migration is being diminished by direct mortality as every year millions Gregory S. Butcher, United States Forest Service of birds die from anthropogenic sources. As documented in this Plan, Alaine F. Camfield, Environment and Climate Change Canada nearly 20% of U.S. and Canadian landbird species are on a path towards Andrew Couturier, Bird Studies Canada endangerment and extinction in the absence of conservation action. Dean W. Demarest, United States Fish and Wildlife Service Randy Dettmers, United States Fish and Wildlife Service We know, however, that when we use the best science to develop Wendy E.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds of the East Texas Baptist University Campus with Birds Observed Off-Campus During BIOL3400 Field Course
    Birds of the East Texas Baptist University Campus with birds observed off-campus during BIOL3400 Field course Photo Credit: Talton Cooper Species Descriptions and Photos by students of BIOL3400 Edited by Troy A. Ladine Photo Credit: Kenneth Anding Links to Tables, Figures, and Species accounts for birds observed during May-term course or winter bird counts. Figure 1. Location of Environmental Studies Area Table. 1. Number of species and number of days observing birds during the field course from 2005 to 2016 and annual statistics. Table 2. Compilation of species observed during May 2005 - 2016 on campus and off-campus. Table 3. Number of days, by year, species have been observed on the campus of ETBU. Table 4. Number of days, by year, species have been observed during the off-campus trips. Table 5. Number of days, by year, species have been observed during a winter count of birds on the Environmental Studies Area of ETBU. Table 6. Species observed from 1 September to 1 October 2009 on the Environmental Studies Area of ETBU. Alphabetical Listing of Birds with authors of accounts and photographers . A Acadian Flycatcher B Anhinga B Belted Kingfisher Alder Flycatcher Bald Eagle Travis W. Sammons American Bittern Shane Kelehan Bewick's Wren Lynlea Hansen Rusty Collier Black Phoebe American Coot Leslie Fletcher Black-throated Blue Warbler Jordan Bartlett Jovana Nieto Jacob Stone American Crow Baltimore Oriole Black Vulture Zane Gruznina Pete Fitzsimmons Jeremy Alexander Darius Roberts George Plumlee Blair Brown Rachel Hastie Janae Wineland Brent Lewis American Goldfinch Barn Swallow Keely Schlabs Kathleen Santanello Katy Gifford Black-and-white Warbler Matthew Armendarez Jordan Brewer Sheridan A.
    [Show full text]
  • Wood Warblers of Lake County (Field Guide)
    Wood of Lake County An educational wildlife pamphlet provided by the Lake County Public Resources Department Parks & Trails Division 2 The Lake County Public Resources Department, Parks & Trails Division, manages more than three dozen parks, preserves and boat ramps. Lake County park rangers lead regularly scheduled nature in some of these parks. In partnership with the Lake County hikes, bird and butterfly surveys and other outdoor adventures Water Authority, Parks & Trails also schedules guided paddling adventures. For a listing of Lake County parks and events, call 352-253-4950, email [email protected] or visit Forwww.lakecountyfl.gov/parks. more information about birds that can be seen in Lake County, or bookstores. Information on birds is also available online at the check out a field guide to birds available at many local libraries Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology, www.birds.cornell.edu. Bird watchers in Florida tend to bring a little more on their trips than their Northern peers. While the average temperature in Lake County is a mild 72°F, the summer months in Central Florida can be steamy. Outside enthusiasts are always encouraged to carry sunscreen to protect skin from sunburn, insect repellent to ward off mosquitoes and plenty of water to avoid dehydration. Sunscreen should be 15 SPF or higher and applied 20 minutes before. 3 Park rangers recommend these six popular comprehensive guides: • A Field Guide to the Birds, Eastern and Central North America (Fourth Edition, 1980, Roger Tory Peterson) • Stokes Field Guide to Birds, Eastern Region (First Edition, 1996, Donald and Lillian Stokes) • All the Birds of North America (First Edition, 1997, The American Bird Conservancy) • Field Guide to the Birds of North America (Fourth Edition, 2002, The National Geographic Society) • Focus Guide to the Birds of North America (First Edition, 2000, Kenn Kaufman) • The Sibley Guide to Birds (First Edition, 2000, David Allen Sibley) Insect repellent should contain DEET.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C. Texas Birds Including Those Found in Three Urban Centers and in Other States
    Appendix C. Texas birds including those found in three urban centers and in other states. (Courtesy of Cassandra LaFleur) Texas Birds Scientific Name Austin Dallas Houston States Checklistb 1. Acadian Flycatcher (Empidonax virescens) H 38 2. Acorn Woodpecker (Melanerpes formicivorus) 14 3. Alder Flycatcher (Empidonax alnorum) 42 4. Allen's Hummingbird (Selasphorus sasin) 20 5. Altamira Oriole (Icterus gularis) 1 6. American Avocet (Recurvirostra americana) D 49 7. American Bittern (Botaurus lentiginosus) H 49 8. American Black Duck (Anas rubripes) 47 9. American Coot (Fulica americana) D H 50 10. American Crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos) Da H 49 11. American Dipper (Cinclus mexicanus) 16 12. American Flamingo (Phoenicopterus ruber) 8 13. American Golden-Plover (Pluvialis dominica) 48 14. American Goldfinch (Spinus tristis) A D H 49 15. American Kestrel (Falco sparverius) D H 49 16. American Oystercatcher (Haematopus palliatus) 21 17. American Pipit (Anthus rubescens) 50 18. American Redstart (Setophaga ruticilla) Da 49 19. American Robin (Turdus migratorius) A Da H 49 20. American Tree Sparrow (Spizella arborea) 49 (Pelecanus 21. American White Pelican D 49 erythrorhynchos) 22. American Wigeon (Anas americana) D 50 23. American Woodcock (Scolopax minor) H 42 24. Anhinga (Anhinga anhinga) D 37 25. Anna's Hummingbird (Calypte anna) 30 26. Aplomado Falcon (Falco femoralis) 3 27. Arctic Tern (Sterna paradisaea) 44 28. Ash-throated Flycatcher (Myiarchus cinerascens) 39 29. Audubon's Oriole (Icterus graduacauda) 2 30. Audubon's Shearwater (Puffinus lherminieri) 17 31. Aztec Thrush (Ridgwayia pinicola) 2 32. Bachman's Sparrow (Peucaea aestivalis) 24 33. Baird's Sandpiper (Calidris bairdii) 50 34. Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) D H 49 35.
    [Show full text]
  • 1- Checklist of New Mexico
    CHECKLIST OF NEW MEXICO BIRD SPECIES Sartor O. Williams III Secretary, New Mexico Bird Records Committee [email protected] 1 January 2021 This checklist contains all the species of birds that have been verified by specimen, photograph, or audio recording in New Mexico and have been accepted as valid by the New Mexico Bird Records Committee. Nomenclature, taxonomy, sequence, and spelling follow the seventh edition of the American Ornithological Society’s [formerly American Ornithologists’ Union, or AOU] Check-list of North American Birds (1998) as amended through the 61st Supplement (Auk 2020, Vol. 137; 24 pp.). Included are all families and species of birds known to occur (or have occurred) in New Mexico in the historical period (1540 to present). Through 1 January 2021, 549 species representing 68 families have been verified in New Mexico, including five established non-native species (identified as “Introduced”) and three species now extirpated (identified as “Extirpated”). Family ANATIDAE: Ducks, Geese, Swans Black-bellied Whistling-Duck, Dendrocygna autumnalis Fulvous Whistling-Duck, Dendrocygna bicolor Snow Goose, Anser caerulescens Ross’s Goose, Anser rossii Greater White-fronted Goose, Anser albifrons Brant, Branta bernicla Cackling Goose, Branta hutchinsii Canada Goose, Branta canadensis Trumpeter Swan, Cygnus buccinator Tundra Swan, Cygnus columbianus Wood Duck, Aix sponsa Garganey, Spatula querquedula Blue-winged Teal, Spatula discors Cinnamon Teal, Spatula cyanoptera Northern Shoveler, Spatula clypeata Gadwall, Mareca
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6 Birds
    6 Birds — Update 2014 Bruce E. Young Although the pace of research on birds in following summarizes the major findings of the Monteverde may have slowed during the 14 27 publications that encompass this new years since the last synopsis (Young and research. McDonald 2000), researchers continue to make important contributions to tropical avian biology Elevational Gradients, Migration, and and other scientific disciplines. Elevational Conservation gradients and migrations of birds along them New research has shed light on the still inspire research in Monteverde, where field remarkable biotic turnovers associated with study at varying elevations is facilitated by the elevational gradients that characterize steep topography and easy access. These Monteverde and many tropical mountain slopes. gradients are also useful for studying biotic A new statistical analysis revealed that the beta responses to climate change, a growing threat to diversity (the increase in species richness across biodiversity, especially in the tropics (Colwell et habitats) of birds on the Pacific slope of al. 2008). Ornithologists completed two new Monteverde is twice as high as that at the same autecological studies and finished two long-term elevations on temperate mountains (Jankowski studies initiated in the 20th century, continuing a et al. 2009). Moisture gradients, rather than long and valuable tradition in Monteverde. Other elevation per se, best explained the rapid species scientists tackled new research topics in bird- turnover. The Caribbean slope of Monteverde, army ant interactions and behavior. Finally, with a less dramatic moisture gradient, has careful observation continues to extend our substantially lower beta diversity than that of the knowledge of natural history, such of the first Pacific slope, where a rain shadow accentuates nest description for Silvery-fronted Tapaculo moisture differences.
    [Show full text]
  • A Description of Mixed-Species Insectivorous Bird Flocks in Western Mexico’
    The Condor 89~282-292 0 The Cooper Omithologml Society 1987 A DESCRIPTION OF MIXED-SPECIES INSECTIVOROUS BIRD FLOCKS IN WESTERN MEXICO’ RICHARD L. HUTTO Department of Zoology, Universityof Montana, Missoula, MT 59812 Abstract. Insectivorousbird flockswere observed in all typesof forestedhabitats during the nonbreedingseason in westernMexico. The speciescomposition of flockschanged markedlyand predictablyamong five categoriesof habitat type. The averagenumber of speciesper flockin lowlandhabitats was 4.7, while a mean of 18.6 speciesparticipated in highlandflocks, ranking the latter amongthe most species-richflocks in the world. The meanproportion of the localinsectivorous species that participatedin mixed-speciesflocks wassignificantly greater in the highlands(6 1.3%)than in the lowlands(24.6%). About half of the flock participantsin both undisturbedlowland and highlandhabitats were north temperatemigrants, ranking west Mexican flocks among the mostmigrant-rich in the world as well. In highlandflocks, the maximum numberof individualsper attendantspecies was generallytwo to three,but therewere often six to twelveindividuals belonging to eachof severalnuclear species. The lowlanddeciduous forest flocks seemed to lack nuclearspecies. Key words: Mixed-speciesflocks; insectivorousbirds; Mexico; migratory birds;pine-oak woodlands;tropical deciduous forests. INTRODUCTION mixed-speciesflocks in 26 sites(Appendix I) that Mixed-speciesinsectivorous bird flockshave been were distributed among various habitats described from temperate and tropical areas throughout western Mexico. The habitat types worldwide (Rand 1954), and are known to occur that I surveyed can be roughly classified (after in practically every habitat type (Powell 1985). Pesman 1962) as belonging to either lowland Although mixed-species flocks are quite com- (tropical deciduous and tropical evergreen) or mon in north temperate regions during the non- highland (oak, pine-oak, and boreal) forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Macgillivrays Warbler
    Wyoming Species Account MacGillivray’s Warbler Geothlypis tolmiei REGULATORY STATUS USFWS: Migratory Bird USFS R2: No special status USFS R4: No special status Wyoming BLM: No special status State of Wyoming: Protected Bird CONSERVATION RANKS USFWS: No special status WGFD: NSS4 (Bc), Tier II WYNDD: G5, S4 Wyoming Contribution: LOW IUCN: Least Concern PIF Continental Concern Score: 11 STATUS AND RANK COMMENTS MacGillivray’s Warbler (Geothlypis tolmiei) does not have any additional regulatory status or conservation rank considerations beyond those listed above. NATURAL HISTORY Taxonomy: Two subspecies of MacGillivray’s Warbler are recognized and known to breed in the United States: G. t. tolmiei and G. t. monticola 1. In Wyoming, G. t. monticola is the known subspecies; it breeds east of the Pacific slope, in the Rocky Mountains and Great Basin, and winters in higher elevations of central and southern Mexico, occasionally in southern California 2, 3. Two additional subspecies of G. tolmiei are not recognized by the American Ornithologists’ Union (AOU): G. t. intermedia and G. t. austinsmithi. The distinguishing characteristic is reported to be a shorter tail length in G. t. austinsmithi and there are specimens of said subspecies from western Wyoming 1, 4. Recent molecular phylogeny efforts concluded that MacGillivray’s Warbler is more closely related to the genus Geothlypis 5. The AOU approved the genus change in 2011 6. Prior to this, the species was placed in the genus Oporornis. Description: The species is a small wood-warbler in the Parulidae Family. MacGillivray’s Warbler is identifiable in the field during the breeding season. Male upperparts are olive green and underparts are yellow.
    [Show full text]