Experimental Hybridization of the New World Quail (Odontophorinae)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Experimental Hybridization of the New World Quail (Odontophorinae) University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Papers in Ornithology Papers in the Biological Sciences 1971 Experimental Hybridization of the New World Quail (Odontophorinae) Paul A. Johnsgard University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biosciornithology Part of the Ornithology Commons Johnsgard, Paul A., "Experimental Hybridization of the New World Quail (Odontophorinae)" (1971). Papers in Ornithology. 59. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biosciornithology/59 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Papers in the Biological Sciences at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Papers in Ornithology by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Johnsgard in the Auk (1971) 88. Copyright 1971, University of California. Used by permission. http://elibrary.unm.edu/sora EXPERIMENTAL HYBRIDIZATION OF THE NEW WORLD QUAIL (ODONTOPHORINAE) • PAULA. J0tINSGARD ALTHOUGHthe surprisingly high capacity for hybridizationamong species of the odontophorinegenera Colinus, Callipepla, and Lophortyxhas been recognizedfor sometime (Gray, 1958), no systematicattempt has been made to produceand study such hybrid combinations.Those that have occurredhave resultedunder natural conditionsor have been fortuitously producedby game breederswho were interestedneither in the hybrids themselvesnor in determiningtheir relative fertility. As a result, the only positiveinformation so far availableon the fertility of hybridsamong this groupis that of Shore-Baily(1913), who obtaineda broodof Fs hybrids from an originalcross between a male ScaledQuail (Callipepla squamata) and a female California Quail (Lophortyx californica). These second- generationbirds died before their fertility could be determined. Hubbard (1966) reporteda possibleback-cross hybrid involvingScaled Quail back- crossedto Gambel'sQuail (Lophortyxgambelii) taken in New Mexico. To my knowledge,no other case of successfulhybridization beyond the first generation has been reported, although hybrid females of various inter- genericcombinations have been known to produceeggs (Johnsgard, 1970). To gain more satisfactoryinformation on the possiblefertility of such hybrids,and to study behavioraland morphologicalfeatures of thesebirds, an effort has been made to breed interspecifichybrid combinationsinvolv- ing all of the North Americanspecies of thesethree genera. These include the ScaledQuail, Gambel'sQuail, California Quail, Elegant or Douglas Quail (Lophortyxdouglasii), and Bobwhite(Colinus virginianus). Also as the hybrid combinationhas twice been reported to occur in nature, the Mountain Quail (Oreortyx picta) was crossedwith the California Quail. All birdswere kept indoorsin roomsprovided with 17-hourphotoperiods and temperaturesranging from about 70 to 80.øF. Two typesof cageswere usedwith equal success,including standard wood and wire-bottomquail breedingpens measuring24 X 24 X 72 inches,and entirely open welded wire cagesapproximately 18 X 14 X 48 inches. Nest boxeswere also pro- vided, but the birds rarely usedthem. Eggswere collecteddaily, placed temporarily under cool storagein plastic bags, and set in an incubator at weekly intervals. The incubatorwas a forced-airmodel of commercialsize with automatic turning, set for dry bulb and wet bulb readingsof 99.3- x Contribution No. 421 from the Department of Zoology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska 68508. 264 The Auk, 88: 264-275. April 1971 Johnsgard in the Auk (1971) 88. Copyright 1971, University of California. Used by permission. http://elibrary.unm.edu/sora April 1971] New World Quail Hybrids 265 100øFand 83-88øF respectively.This setting,which is that recommended for domestic fowl eggs, gave good hatching successwith an incubation periodof slightlyover 23 daysfor all quail speciesand hybrid combinations studied. Eggswere initially candledafter 7 days,when infertile eggsand dead embryos ("early embryonic death" in Table 1) were removed. Subsequentprehatching mortality was recordedas late embryonicdeath, includingfailure to completepipping. Establishmentof hybrid pairingswas usually achievedwith little diffi- culty. Wheneverpossible birds representingthe desiredcrosses were placed togetherbefore they had reachedsexual maturity, and in someinstances as soonas they could be accuratelysexed. Fully adult birds were also used, and with few exceptionsthey soontolerated the new partner. Femalesthat were already producingeggs sometimes did not interrupt their egg-laying schedulewhen placedwith a new male, althoughnone of the eggsdropped shortlyafter new pairingswere made proved fertile. Seriousinjury or the death of a newly introducedfemale occurredin only a few instances,and couldusually be avoidedby early separationof noncompatiblebirds. Pair formationin all the speciesappears to consistof ritualized aggressivepos- tures and inhibited attacks on the female, while the latter assumessubmis- sive posturessuch as crouching.Differences in the vocalizations,postures, and plumage characteristicsof the various speciesthat may serve as iso- lating mechanismsunder natural conditionsare subjectsof future studies and are not considered here. RESULTS Egg production,fertility, and viability.--A summaryof incubationand rearingresults appears in Table 1. With few exceptionsthe numberof eggs incubatedis lessthan the total laid, as someeggs were cracked,used for albumenanalysis, or not incubatedfor other reasons.As the table shows, successwas achieved in rearing F• hybrids between the Bobwhite and Gambel'sQuail, the Bobwhite and ScaledQuail, the Scaledand Gambel's Quail, the California and Scaled Quail, and between the California and Mountain Quail. Except for the first-namedcross, all thesecombinations havepreviously been reported from the wild or captivity (Johnsgard,1970). The fairly substantiallosses of youngof both hybridsand parental types stemmedprimarily from two sources,cannibalism and accidentalchilling. Even weeklybill-trimming failed to controlcompletely losses from pecking, which causedthe most severelosses. In no casewas the death of any F• hybrid clearly attributed to a weaknessat hatching. The weakestchicks at hatchingwere thoseof the DouglasQuail, of which only 4 out of 32 suc- cessfullycompleted pipping and nonelived beyonda week. Likewiseboth the Scaledand Gambel'sQuail young showeda surprisinglyhigh incidence Johnsgard in the Auk (1971) 88. Copyright 1971, University of California. Used by permission. http://elibrary.unm.edu/sora 266 PAUL A. JO•SGARD [Auk, Vol. 88 TABLE 1 RESULTSOF INCUBATION Ot• HYBRIDQUAIL EGGS AS COMPARED WlTlt PARENTALSPECIES Total Early Late eggs embry- embry- incu- Infer- onic onic bated tile death death Hatched Reared Parental Species Bobwhite (B) 28 14 3 0 11 7 Gambel's (G) 62 4 10 20 28 6 California (C) 76 35 39 2 0 0 Douglas (D) 35 1 2 28 4 0 Scaled (S) 83 16 16 26 1 6 Total Parentals 290 70(24.1%) 70(24.1%) 76(26.2%) 74(25.5%) 19 Hybrid Pairings (male X female) BXS 110 43 16 11 40 12 SXB 86 52 34 0 0 0 CXS 47 21 4 3 19 14 BXG 17 0 0 4 13 2 SXG 16 5 0 4 7 1 GXC 13 11 2 0 0 0 GXS 9 6 2 0 1 0 SXD 5 3 0 1 1 0 Mountain X C 34 27 0 4 3 1 Total F• Hybrids 337 168(49.8%) 58(17.2%) 27(8.0%) 84(24.9%) 30 Other Hybrid Pairings F•BG X F•BG 16 6 10 0 0 F•BG X G 28 0 28 0 0 F•GS XF, GS 33 26 7 0 0 S X F• GS 32 11 11 2 8 F• CG X C 32 19 13 0' 0 Fa BC X F_oBC 74 52 22 0 0 F.oBC X B 25 15 10 0 0 F•CSXF•CS 213 211 2 0 0 F• BS X F, BS 228 228 0 0 0 BW X F• BS 44 28 6 10 0 S X F• BS 15 15 0 0 0 Total Other Hybrids 740 611(82.6%) 109(14.7%) 12(1.6%) 8(1.1%) of late embryonicmortality. The low fertility and highincidence of early embryonicdeath in California Quail apparentlywas the result of a subfer- tile male in the singleintraspecies pair that was establishedfor California Quail. The "otherhybrid pairings" included in Table 1 consistmainly of attemptedF2 productionor of backcrosspairings. Records are alsoincluded Johnsgard in the Auk (1971) 88. Copyright 1971, University of California. Used by permission. http://elibrary.unm.edu/sora April 1971] New World Quail Hybrids 267 from pairingsof four F2 Bobwhite x California Quail hybrids that were obtainedfrom the San JoaquinGame Farm, Reedley,California. Accord- ing to the manager,R. Davis (in litt.), thesefour hybrids (two of eachsex) were the only onesthat hatchedfrom a very largenumber of eggslaid by a pair of F• birds reared at that farm. I was unable to obtain the F• birds, but did purchasethe F,,s. Both femaleslaid considerablenumbers of eggs (one produced21 eggsin 21 days, the other 103 eggsin 137 days), all of whichwere abnormally small (averageof 10 is 27.1 x 20.0 ram). Of the 74 eggsset, none exhibitedembryonic development beyond the very earliest stage. The only successfulsecond-generation hybrid production thus far achievedin our laboratoryhas been the hatchingof eight backcrosshybrids (none survivingbeyond 6 days) that resulted from pairing a male Scaled Quail to a female F• Gambel's x ScaledQuail. Earlier attempts to obtain F: offspringfrom the F• generationwere unsuccessful.These F• birds had beenproduced by William S. Huey, who informedme (in litt.) that he too had beenunable to obtain F: birds,but did hatch a numberof chickswhen a ScaledQuail male was in the pen alongwith two F• femalesand a single F• male. Theseresults suggest that at least a limited degreeof hybrid fer- tility existsin Scaledx Gambel'sQuail crosses,for which there was only suggestiveevidence
Recommended publications
  • CATALINA CALIFORNIA QUAIL (Callipepla Californica Catalinensis) Paul W
    II SPECIES ACCOUNTS Andy Birch PDF of Catalina California Quail account from: Shuford, W. D., and Gardali, T., editors. 2008. California Bird Species of Special Concern: A ranked assessment of species, subspecies, and distinct populations of birds of immediate conservation concern in California. Studies of Western Birds 1. Western Field Ornithologists, Camarillo, California, and California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento. California Bird Species of Special Concern CATALINA CALIFORNIA QUAIL (Callipepla californica catalinensis) Paul W. Collins Criteria Scores Population Trend 0 Santa Range Trend 0 Barbara County Population Size 7.5 Range Size 10 Ventura Endemism 10 County Population Concentration 10 Threats 0 Los San Miguel Is. Santa Cruz Is. Angeles County Anacapa Is. Santa Rosa Is. Santa Barbara Is. Santa Catalina Is. San Nicolas Is. San Clemente Is. Current Year-round Range Historic Year-round Range County Boundaries Kilometers 20 10 0 20 Current and historic (ca. 1944) year-round range of the Catalina California Quail. Birds from Santa Catalina Island (perhaps brought by Native Americans) later introduced successfully to Santa Rosa (1935–1940) and Santa Cruz (late 1940s) islands, but unsuccessfully to San Nicolas Island (1962); quail from mainland populations of C. c. californica introduced unsuccessfully to Santa Cruz (prior to 1875) and San Clemente (late 19th century, 1913) islands. Catalina California Quail Studies of Western Birds 1:107–111, 2008 107 Studies of Western Birds No. 1 SPECIAL CONCERN PRIORITY HISTORIC RANGE AND ABUNDANCE Currently considered a Bird Species of Special IN CALIFORNIA Concern (year round), priority 3. This subspecies Grinnell and Miller (1944) described the Catalina was not included on prior special concern lists California Quail as a “common to abundant” (Remsen 1978, CDFG 1992).
    [Show full text]
  • 111 Historical Notes on Whooping Cranes at White
    HISTORICAL NOTES ON WHOOPING CRANES AT WHITE LAKE, LOUISIANA: THE JOHN J. LYNCH INTERVIEWS, 1947-1948 GAY M. GOMEZ, Department of Social Sciences, McNeese State University, Box 92335, Lake Charles, LA 70609, USA RODERICK C. DREWIEN, Hornocker Wildlife Institute, University of Idaho, 3346 E 200 N, Rigby, ID 83442, USA MARY LYNCH COURVILLE, John J. Lynch American Natural Heritage Park, 1393 Henderson Highway, Breaux Bridge, LA 70517, USA Abstract: In May 1939 biologist John J. Lynch of the U.S. Bureau of Biological Survey conducted an aerial survey that documented the existence of a non-migratory population of whooping cranes (Grus americana) near White Lake in southwest Louisiana. Lynch found 13 cranes, including 2 pre-fledged young, confirming breeding. Lynch’s survey occurred, in part, because fur trappers and alligator hunters working in the White Lake marshes had informed the biologist of the cranes’ presence and habits. Lynch con- tinued his contacts with these knowledgeable marsh users, and in 1947 and 1948 interviewed at least 7 individuals. In 2001, M. L. Courville, along with her sister Nora Z. Lynch, discovered the interview notes among their father’s papers. The notes contain information on the Louisiana non-migratory population’s range, abundance, habitat use, feeding behavior, nesting, and young, including survival of twins; they also include a small amount of information on sandhill cranes (Grus canadensis) and migratory whooping cranes. Both Lynch and Robert P. Allen relied heavily on this “traditional ecological knowledge” in their accounts of non-migratory whooping cranes in southwest Louisiana. Because of their biological and historical significance, the interview notes are reproduced in this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Masked Bobwhite (Colinus Virginianus Ridgwayi) 5-Year Review
    Masked Bobwhite (Colinus virginianus ridgwayi) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation Photograph by Paul Zimmerman U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Buenos Aires National Wildlife Refuge Sasabe, AZ March 2014 5-YEAR REVIEW Masked Bobwhite (Colinus virginianus ridgwayi) 1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION 1.1 Reviewers Lead Regional Office Southwest Region, Region 2, Albuquerque, NM Susan Jacobsen, Chief, Division of Classification and Restoration, 505-248-6641 Wendy Brown, Chief, Branch of Recovery and Restoration, 505-248-6664 Jennifer Smith-Castro, Recovery Biologist, 505-248-6663 Lead Field Office: Buenos Aires National Wildlife Refuge (BANWR) Sally Gall, Refuge Manager, 520-823-4251 x 102 Juliette Fernandez, Assistant Refuge Manager, 520-823-4251 x 103 Dan Cohan, Wildlife Biologist, 520-823-4351 x 105 Mary Hunnicutt, Wildlife Biologist, 520-823-4251 Cooperating Field Office(s): Arizona Ecological Services Tucson Field Office Jean Calhoun, Assistant Field Supervisor, 520-670-6150 x 223 Mima Falk, Senior Listing Biologist, 520-670-6150 x 225 Scott Richardson, Supervisory Fish and Wildlife Biologist, 520-670-6150 x 242 Mark Crites, Fish and Wildlife Biologist, 520-670-6150 x 229 Arizona Ecological Services Field Office Steve Spangle, Field Supervisor, 602-242-0210 x 244 1.2 Purpose of 5-Year Reviews: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service or USFWS) is required by section 4(c)(2) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) to conduct a status review of each listed species once every 5 years. The purpose of a 5-year review is to evaluate whether or not the species’ status has changed since it was listed (or since the most recent 5-year review).
    [Show full text]
  • Wisconsin Bird Nesting Dates for Species Tracked by the Natural
    Introduction to the “Wisconsin Bird Nesting Dates (Avoidance Period) for Species Tracked by the Natural Heritage Inventory” The table “Wisconsin Bird Nesting Dates (Avoidance Period) for Species Tracked by the Natural Heritage Inventory” below, provides guidance to DNR staff and external certified reviewers who use the NHI Portal for Endangered Resources reviews. This guidance was developed by a team of Natural Heritage Conservation program staff from DNR using the best available information for species on the Natural Heritage Working List. The Nesting Dates (Avoidance Period) table was developed to help customers comply with State and Federal laws and thus avoid “intentional taking, killing, or possession” of bird nests, eggs, and body parts. For each species, the avoidance dates are the period each year when birds are most vulnerable because there are eggs or flightless chicks in nests. Species tracked by the Natural Heritage Inventory include endangered, threatened and special concern species. Avoidance of these nesting dates is required for endangered and threatened species and recommended (voluntary) for special concern species. For more information on rare bird species, see the Rare Bird webpage. Revised 10/18/2019 https://dnr.wi.gov/topic/endangeredresources/documents/wisbirdnestingcalendar.pdf Wisconsin Bird Avoidance Dates for Species Tracked by the Natural Heritage Inventory Common Name Scientific Name Status Avoidance Dates Acadian Flycatcher Empidonax virescens THR 25 May - 20 Aug American Bittern Botaurus lentiginosus SC/M
    [Show full text]
  • Body Temperatures in California and Gambel's Quail
    150 Baa•oz,o•awand DawsoN, California and Gambel's Quail [1VoL Auk 75 BODY TEMPERATURES IN CALIFORNIA AND GAMBEL'S QUAIL BY GEORGE A. BARTHOLOMEW AND WILLIAM R. DAWSON Tm• paucity of data on the body temperaturesof small gallinaceous birds prompts us to report miscellaneousobservations which we have made over the past severalyears on the body temperaturesof the Cali- fornia Quail, Lophortyxcalifornicus, a commonresident in grasslandand chaparral from southernOregon to southern Baja Cal/fornia, and the Gambel's Quail, L. œambelii,a residentin the desert regionsof south- western United States and northwestern Mexico. The habitats of both speciesare characterizedby high summer temperaturesand moderate winter conditions. We have therefore paid particular attention to capacity for temperature regulation in hot environments. We found that when ambient (environmental)temperature rose, the birds' body temperaturecould rise by as much as 4ø C. (7.2ø F.), without ill effects. Ability to maintain above normal body temperatures higher than ambient temperaturesfacilitates transfer of excessbody heat to the environment. It is probablya major avian adaptationto hot conditions. The data presentedwere acquiredincidental to work on other species and for that reasonare not comprehensive,but they serveto characterize aspectsof temperatureregulation in quail. MATERIALS AND METHODS The observationswere made on 8 adult and 2 juvenile California Quailcaptured on the LosAngeles campus of the Universityof California, and on 5 adult and 2 juvenile Gambers Quail capturedin the Colorado Desert, three miles south of Calipatria, Imperial County, California. The captive animals of both specieswere housedin cagesof half-inch wire mesh wh/ch measured 12 x 12 x 24 inches and had sand-covered floors.
    [Show full text]
  • Bird List with Jake Mohlmann
    Cumulative Bird List with Jake Mohlmann Column A: number of tours (out of 10) on which this species has been recorded Column B: number of days this species was seen on the 2020 tour Column C: maximum daily count for this species on the 2020 tour Column D: H = Heard only A B C D 1 Pacific Loon Gavia pacifica 1 Common Loon Gavia immer 1 Greater White-fronted Goose Anser albifrons 9 Snow Goose 1 65 Chen caerulescens 5 Ross's Goose 1 2 Chen rossii 3 Canada Goose Branta canadensis 1 Wood Duck Aix sponsa 10 Gadwall 3 15 Anas strepera 2 Eurasian Wigeon Anas penelope 10 American Wigeon 2 400 Anas americana 10 Mallard 2 6 Anas platyrhynchos 10 Mexican Duck 1 3 Anas diazi 4 Blue-winged Teal Anas discors 10 Cinnamon Teal 2 10 Anas cyanoptera 10 Northern Shoveler 2 100 Anas clypeata 10 Northern Pintail 1 150 Anas acuta 10 Green-winged Teal 2 50 Anas crecca 9 Canvasback 1 5 Aythya valisineria 6 Redhead 2 2 Aythya americana 10 Ring-necked Duck 2 15 Aythya collaris 1 Greater Scaup 1 2 Aythya marila 9 Lesser Scaup 1 6 Aythya affinis 7 Bufflehead 1 3 Bucephala albeola 10 Common Merganser 1 37 Mergus merganser 10 Ruddy Duck 3 30 Oxyura jamaicensis 5 Scaled Quail Callipepla squamata 10 Gambel's Quail 3 12 Callipepla gambelii 4 Montezuma Quail 1 15 Cyrtonyx montezumae 9 Wild Turkey 2 18 Melagris gallopavo merriamii ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ WINGS ● 1643 N. Alvernon Way Ste. 109 ● Tucson ● AZ ● 85712 ● www.wingsbirds.com (866) 547 9868 Toll free US + Canada ● Tel (520) 320-9868
    [Show full text]
  • The Coastal Scrub and Chaparral Bird Conservation Plan
    The Coastal Scrub and Chaparral Bird Conservation Plan A Strategy for Protecting and Managing Coastal Scrub and Chaparral Habitats and Associated Birds in California A Project of California Partners in Flight and PRBO Conservation Science The Coastal Scrub and Chaparral Bird Conservation Plan A Strategy for Protecting and Managing Coastal Scrub and Chaparral Habitats and Associated Birds in California Version 2.0 2004 Conservation Plan Authors Grant Ballard, PRBO Conservation Science Mary K. Chase, PRBO Conservation Science Tom Gardali, PRBO Conservation Science Geoffrey R. Geupel, PRBO Conservation Science Tonya Haff, PRBO Conservation Science (Currently at Museum of Natural History Collections, Environmental Studies Dept., University of CA) Aaron Holmes, PRBO Conservation Science Diana Humple, PRBO Conservation Science John C. Lovio, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, U.S. Navy (Currently at TAIC, San Diego) Mike Lynes, PRBO Conservation Science (Currently at Hastings University) Sandy Scoggin, PRBO Conservation Science (Currently at San Francisco Bay Joint Venture) Christopher Solek, Cal Poly Ponoma (Currently at UC Berkeley) Diana Stralberg, PRBO Conservation Science Species Account Authors Completed Accounts Mountain Quail - Kirsten Winter, Cleveland National Forest. Greater Roadrunner - Pete Famolaro, Sweetwater Authority Water District. Coastal Cactus Wren - Laszlo Szijj and Chris Solek, Cal Poly Pomona. Wrentit - Geoff Geupel, Grant Ballard, and Mary K. Chase, PRBO Conservation Science. Gray Vireo - Kirsten Winter, Cleveland National Forest. Black-chinned Sparrow - Kirsten Winter, Cleveland National Forest. Costa's Hummingbird (coastal) - Kirsten Winter, Cleveland National Forest. Sage Sparrow - Barbara A. Carlson, UC-Riverside Reserve System, and Mary K. Chase. California Gnatcatcher - Patrick Mock, URS Consultants (San Diego). Accounts in Progress Rufous-crowned Sparrow - Scott Morrison, The Nature Conservancy (San Diego).
    [Show full text]
  • The Birds (Aves) of Oromia, Ethiopia – an Annotated Checklist
    European Journal of Taxonomy 306: 1–69 ISSN 2118-9773 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2017.306 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2017 · Gedeon K. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A32EAE51-9051-458A-81DD-8EA921901CDC The birds (Aves) of Oromia, Ethiopia – an annotated checklist Kai GEDEON 1,*, Chemere ZEWDIE 2 & Till TÖPFER 3 1 Saxon Ornithologists’ Society, P.O. Box 1129, 09331 Hohenstein-Ernstthal, Germany. 2 Oromia Forest and Wildlife Enterprise, P.O. Box 1075, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia. 3 Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, Centre for Taxonomy and Evolutionary Research, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany. * Corresponding author: [email protected] 2 Email: [email protected] 3 Email: [email protected] 1 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:F46B3F50-41E2-4629-9951-778F69A5BBA2 2 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:F59FEDB3-627A-4D52-A6CB-4F26846C0FC5 3 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:A87BE9B4-8FC6-4E11-8DB4-BDBB3CFBBEAA Abstract. Oromia is the largest National Regional State of Ethiopia. Here we present the first comprehensive checklist of its birds. A total of 804 bird species has been recorded, 601 of them confirmed (443) or assumed (158) to be breeding birds. At least 561 are all-year residents (and 31 more potentially so), at least 73 are Afrotropical migrants and visitors (and 44 more potentially so), and 184 are Palaearctic migrants and visitors (and eight more potentially so). Three species are endemic to Oromia, 18 to Ethiopia and 43 to the Horn of Africa. 170 Oromia bird species are biome restricted: 57 to the Afrotropical Highlands biome, 95 to the Somali-Masai biome, and 18 to the Sudan-Guinea Savanna biome.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Ecology of Montezuma Quail in the Davis Mountains of Texas
    ECOLOGY OF MONTEZUMA QUAIL IN THE DAVIS MOUNTAINS OF TEXAS A Thesis By CURTIS D. GREENE Submitted to the School of Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences Sul Ross State University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE December 2011 Major Subject: Range and Wildlife Management ECOLOGY OF MONTEZUMA QUAIL IN THE DAVIS MOUNTAINS OF TEXAS A Thesis By CURTIS D. GREENE Approved as to style and content by: _______________________________ ____________________________ Louis A. Harveson, Ph.D. Dale Rollins, Ph.D. (Chair of Committee) (Member) ____________________________ Patricia Moody Harveson, Ph.D. (Member) _______________________ Robert J. Kinucan, Ph.D. Dean of Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences ABSTRACT Montezuma quail (Cyrtonyx montezumae) occur throughout the desert mountain ranges in the Trans Pecos of Texas as well as the states of New Mexico and Arizona. Limited information on life history and ecology of the species is available due to the cryptic nature of the bird. Home range, movements, and preferred habitats have been speculated upon in previous literature with the use of observational or anecdotal data. With modern trapping techniques and technologically advanced radio transmitters, Montezuma quail have been successfully monitored providing assessments of their ecology with the use of hard data. The objective of this study was to monitor Montezuma quail to determine home range size, movements, habitat preference, and assess population dynamics for the Davis Mountains population. Over the course of two years (2009 – 2010) a total of 72 birds (36M, 35F, 1 Undetermined) were captured. Thirteen individuals with >25 locations per bird were evaluated in the home range, movement, and habitat selection analyses.
    [Show full text]
  • 12 GEO V 1921 No 57 Animals Protection and Game
    12 GEO. V.] Animals Protection and Game. [1921, No. 57. 465 New Zealand. ANALYSIS. Title. PART IV. 1. Sbort Title and commencement. AC<JLDlATIZATION DIsTRICTS AND BOOIIIITIlIIS. S. Interpretation. 21. Acolimatization distriots. 22. ~ration of existing acclimatization looie· PART I. 23. Registration of societies formed after com· AlOMALII l'BOTBOTION. mencement of tbis Aot. 3. Certain animals to be absolutely protected. 24. Registered societies to be bodies oorporate. 4. PartiaJ protection of animals. 26. Alterations of rules to be approved by tbe 5. As to animals ceasing to be absolutely pro­ Minister. tected. 26. Annual balance-sheet, &0., to be forwarded to 6. Sanotuaries for imported and native game. Minister of Finance. 27. Wbere default made in forwarding balanoe­ 7. Land may be taken for sanotuaries, &c. sheet. 28. Vesting of animals in sooieti~. 29. Societies to notify Minister of imported PART IL animals tumed at large. Governor-General GAME. may vest in societies property in suoh animals. 8. Imported game and native ga.me. 9. Open seasons for imported and native game. PART V. O1fence to take or kill ga.me.during olose GENERAL. season. 30. Restriotion on importation, liberation, or 10. Notification as to oonditions on whioh open keeping of animals. Master, owner, &o.~ season deolared. of ship to prevent noxious reptiles or in- 11. No game to be trapped. Use of metal- sects from being landed in New Zealand. patched or metal-oased bullets unlawful. I Offenee. 12. Use of heavy guns unlawful. 31. Minister may authorize catching or taking of 13. Use of cylinders. silencers, and live decoys animals for certain purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Tinamiformes – Falconiformes
    LIST OF THE 2,008 BIRD SPECIES (WITH SCIENTIFIC AND ENGLISH NAMES) KNOWN FROM THE A.O.U. CHECK-LIST AREA. Notes: "(A)" = accidental/casualin A.O.U. area; "(H)" -- recordedin A.O.U. area only from Hawaii; "(I)" = introducedinto A.O.U. area; "(N)" = has not bred in A.O.U. area but occursregularly as nonbreedingvisitor; "?" precedingname = extinct. TINAMIFORMES TINAMIDAE Tinamus major Great Tinamou. Nothocercusbonapartei Highland Tinamou. Crypturellus soui Little Tinamou. Crypturelluscinnamomeus Thicket Tinamou. Crypturellusboucardi Slaty-breastedTinamou. Crypturellus kerriae Choco Tinamou. GAVIIFORMES GAVIIDAE Gavia stellata Red-throated Loon. Gavia arctica Arctic Loon. Gavia pacifica Pacific Loon. Gavia immer Common Loon. Gavia adamsii Yellow-billed Loon. PODICIPEDIFORMES PODICIPEDIDAE Tachybaptusdominicus Least Grebe. Podilymbuspodiceps Pied-billed Grebe. ?Podilymbusgigas Atitlan Grebe. Podicepsauritus Horned Grebe. Podicepsgrisegena Red-neckedGrebe. Podicepsnigricollis Eared Grebe. Aechmophorusoccidentalis Western Grebe. Aechmophorusclarkii Clark's Grebe. PROCELLARIIFORMES DIOMEDEIDAE Thalassarchechlororhynchos Yellow-nosed Albatross. (A) Thalassarchecauta Shy Albatross.(A) Thalassarchemelanophris Black-browed Albatross. (A) Phoebetriapalpebrata Light-mantled Albatross. (A) Diomedea exulans WanderingAlbatross. (A) Phoebastriaimmutabilis Laysan Albatross. Phoebastrianigripes Black-lootedAlbatross. Phoebastriaalbatrus Short-tailedAlbatross. (N) PROCELLARIIDAE Fulmarus glacialis Northern Fulmar. Pterodroma neglecta KermadecPetrel. (A) Pterodroma
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Northern Bobwhite and Scaled Quail in Western Oklahoma
    P-1054 Research Summary: Evaluation of Northern Bobwhite and Scaled Quail in Western Oklahoma Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station Division of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources Oklahoma State University Research Summary: Evaluation of Northern Bobwhite and Scaled Quail in Western Oklahoma Researchers involved in this study included: Kent Andersson Senior Research Specialist Eric Thacker Post-Doctoral Researcher Matt Carroll, PhD Evan Tanner, PhD Jeremy Orange, MS Rachel Carroll, MS Cameron Duquette, MS Craig Davis Professor and Bollenbach Chair in Wildlife Management Sam Fuhlendorf Professor and Groendyke Chair in Wildlife Conservation Dwayne Elmore Extension Wildlife Specialist, Professor and Bollenbach Chair in Wildlife Management Introduction Results and Implications There are two species of native quail that occur Survival in Oklahoma, the northern bobwhite (hereafter bobwhite), and the scaled quail (or blue quail). During the study, 1,051 mortalities were Both of these species are popular with hunters and recorded at Packsaddle Wildlife Management landowners. Due to a concern about declining Area. Forty-four percent were attributed to quail populations in the state, a cooperative quail mammals, 33 percent to raptors, 9 percent to study between Oklahoma State University and the hunter harvest, 5 percent to unknown predation, Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation 3 percent to weather exposure and 7 percent to was conducted on the Packsaddle and Beaver miscellaneous causes. River Wildlife Management Areas from 2011- At Beaver River Wildlife Management Area, 2017. Broadly, the project was intended to 929 mortalities were recorded. Forty-seven document survival, nest success, brood success, percent were attributed to mammals, 27 percent habitat selection, genetics and movement of quail.
    [Show full text]