DOCSLIB.ORG

Solutions for Low Indiana Vote Turnout Atrophy in Participation Requires Stewardship by BRIAN A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Solutions for Low Indiana Vote Turnout Atrophy in Participation Requires Stewardship by BRIAN A V20, N42 Thursday, July 30, 2015 Solutions for low Indiana vote turnout Atrophy in participation requires stewardship By BRIAN A. HOWEY and MATTHEW BUTLER INDIANAPOLIS – The concept of stewardship means leaving things in better shape than you found them. For many in the current generation of political and policy leadership in Indiana, they’ve witnessed a steep decline in voter partici- pation. Over the past generation, voter turnout has plummeted to the point where the state has one of the worst rates in the United States. Hoo- sier policy makers need to explore and implement reforms. pares to 79.8% who voted in Alabama, 57.6% in When it comes Maine, 54.3% in Wisconsin and 49.5% in Oregon. to voter turnout, Indiana In 2010, Indiana ranked 38th with 36.8% vot- ranked 43rd according to the Election Assistance Com- ing. “The last time voter turnout dipped below 36.4% in a mission in the 2014 elections with 27.7% of people in the U.S. general election was 1942, when 33.9% hit the polls,” state over age 18. The New York Times ranked Indiana 50th in voter turnout using a different criterion. This com- Continued on page 3 Gregg’s lessons learned By CHRIS SAUTTER WASHINGTON – It’s often said in politics that a candidate can learn more from losing than winning. Bill Clinton as the nation’s youngest former governor learned enough from his 1980 loss to win it right back in a re- match. Barack Obama used les- “The Club For Growth PAC sons from his 2000 loss for a U.S. House seat to successfully win a strongly endorses Marlin seat in the U.S. Senate four years Stutzman for U.S. Senate. Marlin later. John Gregg and Glenda has fought for economic liberty Ritz are good examples of both sides of that adage. Former since he was elected to Congress House Speaker Gregg, who in 2010.” started slowly in his 2012 race for governor before losing to - Club For Growth President Mike Pence in a surprisingly close David McIntosh election, is off to a fast start in Page 2 a possible re-match. On the other At the Washington event, hand, State Superintendent of Public Gregg shared some interesting results Instruction Glenda Ritz thus far seems from focus groups his campaign to have learned the wrong lessons commissioned just before the RFRA from her stunning victory over incum- controversy broke. Voters who partici- bent Tony Bennett in 2012. pated in the focus groups liked Pence Gregg visited Washington personally. But not one of them could recently, meeting with the Democratic cite a single accomplishment of his Governors Association, raising some administration. As the saying goes, money, and basking a bit in second Pence’s support before RFRA was a is a non-partisan newslet- quarter fundraising totals that showed mile wide but an inch deep. Now, as ter based in Indianapolis and him outraising Gov. Pence by about a result of RFRA, what likely sticks Nashville, Ind. It was founded $125,000 this year, though Pence still out in the minds of most voters is in 1994 in Fort Wayne. has significantly more money in the that Mike Pence was clueless about bank. Gregg told a group of sup- the hazards of RFRA and that he It is published by porters at a downtown Washington embarrassed Indiana nationally. That WWWHowey Media, LLC gathering that last time he tended to negative impression will be difficult to 405 Massachusetts Ave., opt for attending the small town bean erase. Suite 300 Indianapolis, IN supper over making fundraising calls. Indiana’s governor race is 46204 As a result of his poor fundraising, he on the radar screen of national Demo- failed to convince the DGA to invest crats this time.The major reason for more than nominally in his first race the enthusiasm obviously stems from Brian A. Howey, Publisher against Pence. Afterward, the DGA Pence’s disastrous handling of RFRA. Mark Schoeff Jr., Washington conceded, given the closeness of the But Democrats are also clearly pleased Jack E. Howey, Editor race, that they might have missed an with Gregg’s much-improved approach Mary Lou Howey, Editor opportunity to “steal one” from the to campaigning. GOP. Campaigns matter. The last Maureen Hayden, Statehouse Gregg also seems to have time Hoosier Democrats won a gov- Matthew Butler, Daily Wire learned lessons in messaging. In his ernor’s race they were supposed to Mark Curry, photography first run, Gregg over-relied on down- lose was in 1996.That year Lt. Gov. home Hoosier themes instead of Frank O’Bannon defeated Indianapolis Subscriptions emphasizing important professional Mayor Stephen Goldsmith, though strengths and explaining what he overwhelmingly handicappers believed HPI, HPI Daily Wire $599 would do differently than Pence. He Goldsmith would prevail. O’Bannon HPI Weekly, $350 came across as “not gubernatorial” in won, in large part, because he ran Ray Volpe, Account Manager his television commercials last time. one of the best statewide campaigns 317.602.3620 Gregg has a wealth of in recent memory. Tom New, who email: [email protected] knowledge about how state govern- skillfully managed the 1996 O’Bannon ment works from his days as Speaker race, is advising John Gregg this year of the Indiana House. And, as a and apparently Gregg is listening. Contact HPI former college president, he has an Meanwhile, the Ritz campaign www.howeypolitics.com advantage over both Pence and Ritz is nothing if not puzzling. While it is [email protected] on the issue of higher education. In true that she won her race in 2012 Howey’s cell: 317.506.0883 2012, those strengths were obscured with very little money, she could not by questionable TV ads designed to possibly believe she can be elected Washington: 202.256.5822 garner attention and raise his name governor without strong fundraising. Business Office: 317.602.3620 recognition. She apparently hit a roadblock with This time Gregg seems totally organized labor and some of the other © 2015, Howey Politics Indiana. focused on the message that Indiana major Democratic contributors. But it All rights reserved. Photocopy- deserves better than the ideologically would seem that she could easily raise driven and divisive policies of Mike an amount in six figures or more from ing, Internet forwarding, fax- Pence. He is talking about his impres- her much vaunted statewide grass- ing or reproducing in any form, sive resume and the policies he would roots network, if nothing else. whole or part, is a violation of implement to promote job creation, Ritz’s various fundraising federal law without permission improve education, and bring Hoosiers and other problems lead inescapably from the publisher. together. to the conclusion that no one is in Page 3 charge or in control of her campaign. She has time to turn have prevented the RFRA crisis? If not, the Democratic it around, but the current negative buzz in Indiana political nominee, whoever it is, has a good shot at an upset. circles makes her task even more difficult. Winning is obviously better than losing. But win or If Gregg has learned important lessons from his lose, candidates need to understand why they won or lost last campaign, the question then is whether Mike Pence and take corrective action to improve their chances of win- has learned the right lessons from both his narrow vic- ning the next election. tory in 2012 and his disastrous handling of the RFRA crisis John Gregg seems to be learning the right lessons earlier this year. If he is able to put RFRA behind him and from 2012. Whether either Glenda Ritz or Mike Pence will keep his party united, he will be the favorite again. Indiana remains to be seen. v is a Republican state. It takes unique circumstances or a special candidate for a Democrat to win statewide. Sautter is a Democratic consultant based in Wash- But does Pence understand why his last race was ington. surprisingly close and why he missed signals that could (those numbers rose to 41% Republican with leaners and Vote reform, from page 1 36% Democrats with leaners), while 24% described them- selves as independent. Republicans tend observed Terre Haute Tribune-Star to respond that when Democrats drew the columnist Mark Bennett. maps in 1991 and 2001, Democrats ended Of the 435 U.S. House seats, up with more House seats than the total 56 are considered competitive, but vote. none is in Indiana. There were 54 “The outcomes are decided well in ad- seats in the Indiana General Assem- vance,” said Sugar. “We need to take the bly that were unopposed in 2014. politics away. People want to make choices And in 2012, while President Obama between good candidates. You have too received 44% of the vote in Indiana, many districts that are noncompetitive. Hoosiers elected seven Republicans There are districts on both sides of the aisle and two Democrats to the U.S. that are like that. When you have unop- House, 40 Republicans to the Indiana posed candidates running, that removes that Senate compared to 10 Democrats, choice. That removes the motivation that and 71 Republicans to the Indiana someone has to get involved in the process. House, compared to 29 Democrats. Some of the things involved there can be Bennett quoted University changed, some cannot.” of Florida political scientist Michael Sugar has forged a “No Politics Plan” that McDonald who cited Indiana elec- is seeking an independent redistricting com- tion laws that tamp down voter Tom Sugar is pushing the Lead or Leave mission in Indiana.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2009 CAFR Production
    City of Fort Wayne, Indiana 2009 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the year ended December 31,2009 Thomas C. Henry Patricia A. Roller CPA Mayor Controller COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT City of Fort Wayne, Indiana Year Ended December 31, 2009 Patricia A. Roller, CPA Director of Finance and Administration City Controller Valerie A. Ahr Deputy Controller Mark Knepper Deputy Director of Financial Operations INTRODUCTION Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION Page(s) Table of Contents.......................................................................................................................................1-3 Mayor’s Letter of Transmittal ........................................................................................................................5 Chief Financial Officer’s Letter of Transmittal..........................................................................................6-13 Locator Maps .........................................................................................................................................14-16 Organization Chart.................................................................................................................................17-18 List of Principal Officials.........................................................................................................................19-20 Department Details ................................................................................................................................21-33 Fort Wayne at a
    [Show full text]
  • Time Running out to Catch Coats 4 Rival GOP Senate Candidates Have Less Than a Month to Build ID and Drive an Issue
    V 15, N29 Thursday, April 8, 2010 Time running out to catch Coats 4 rival GOP Senate candidates have less than a month to build ID and drive an issue By BRIAN A. HOWEY INDIANAPOLIS – For a statewide candidate to drive up name identification in order to credibly deliver a message that could help win an election, even a primary, the price tag is somewhere in the $1 million range to purchase 3,000 to 4,000 gross rating points, sans the Chicago broadcast TV market. For that reason, with less than a month to go before the Republican U.S. Senate primary, the window is quickly closing on candi- dates not named Dan Coats. will “do statewide radio over the last two weeks” along with To date, none of the five candidates are running phone banking during that time span. any media or sending direct mail. None has demonstrated Asked how much support he would need to wrest any robust early FEC numbers or leaked head-to-head the nomination away from Coats, Hostettler drew on his polls showing that Coats is vulnerable. Coats is expected to 1994 primary victory in the 8th CD. “I’ll need anywhere begin his TV campaign next week. His perceived top chal- lenger, former Congressman John Hostettler, told HPI he Continued on Page 4 Marlin our Scott Brown? By CHRIS SAUTTER WASHINGTON - He’s never posed nude for Cos- mopolitan and his children are too young to appear on American Idol. But Indiana State Senator Marlin Stutzman believes he is positioning himself to be the Scott Brown in “There won’t be any balance left this year’s race to succeed Indiana’s retiring U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Education Session Roars Back at Sine
    V20, N32 Thursday, April 30, 2015 Education session roars back at sine die Pence priorities addressed in final hours of compromise By MATTHEW BUTLER INDIANAPOLIS – With Religious Free- dom Restoration Act and the Common Wage repeal settled, the “education session” came roaring back for the final days of the 2015 119th Indiana General Assembly. The House passed the budget 69- 30 literally minutes to midnight Wednesday evening. Only a short period before the Senate passed the biennial spending measure 40-9. The two super majorities passed legisla- Speaker Brian Bosma makes a point with House Minority Leader Scott Pelath in tion that addressed priorities Republican leader- the final hours of the Indiana General Assembly on Wednesday. (HPI Photo by ship and Gov. Mike Pence highlighted back in Mark Curry) January, such as increased funding for K-12 edu- terms of powers and responsibilities. Oversight of ISTEP, cation, a revised school funding formula, increased school most of the A-through-F grading system, and the state’s choice funding, and significant reforms to the State Board burgeoning school voucher program will be transferred to of Education (SBOE). the SBOE’s control and, starting in 2017, the superinten- Between SB1 and the budget, the superintendent of public instruction as an elected office is diminished in Continued on page 3 Pence in wonderland By BRIAN A. HOWEY INDIANAPOLIS – On the Indiana Republican Party website under the “events” tab, the Marion County Rea- gan Dinner had been scheduled for tonight with Gov. Mike Pence on the bill as keynoter. It made perfect sense: The governor fresh off of his second “Gov.
    [Show full text]
  • Mclain, Joseph E **** This Is an EXTERNAL Email. Exercise Caution. DO NOT Open Attachments Or Click Links from Unknown Senders O
    Mclain, Joseph E From: Drake Abramson <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, April 10, 2020 12:06 PM To: Elections Subject: In-Person Voting **** This is an EXTERNAL email. Exercise caution. DO NOT open attachments or click links from unknown senders or unexpected email. **** To the Indiana Election Commission: In-person voting is a sacred right, and time-tested tradition for Hoosier voters all across the state of Indiana. All though these are unprecedented times, we should continue to preserve these long held traditions of in-person voting on election day. There are countless ways in which we can provide safe training and resources to county election administrators to ensure election day is safe for all those participating. There are numerous examples that show voting by mail is significantly more susceptible to voter fraud than election day voting. This can be shown through some very specific examples including some of the following I have mentioned below: Max Judson, Sullivan County Council member – Fraudulent use of absentee ballots – Pled guilty to three counts of voter fraud Doug Campbell, Mayor of Austin Indiana – Fraudulent use of absentee ballots – Completed an incomplete ballot for a voter Michael Marshall, Jennings County Democrat Party worker – Fraudulent use of absentee ballots – Fraudulently submitted absentee ballot applications for his son, brother and former roommate. I understand that we are going through unprecedented times but in order to keep stability in our state, we must adjust and proceed accordingly. I believe with proper training of county election administrators, we can ensure safety when voting in-person on election day.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Platform Was Drafted After Soliciting Testimony from a Geographically Diverse Range of Hoosiers at Hearings in South Bend, New Albany and Indianapolis
    Preamble We've come a long way in a short time. With a focus and a commitment to serve Hoosier taxpayers, and not special interests, Indiana's Party of Purpose has enacted improvements that have made government smaller and more efficient, improved our state's economy, and ensured Indiana's Comeback continues to move full steam ahead. After years of government spending and debt, Republican leadership balanced the budget without raising taxes. At the same time, services have improved across the state. A leaner state government has actually improved quality. Our Bureau of Motor Vehicles is now a model for efficiency, moving customers through in 10 minutes or less. Major Moves has improved infrastructure by providing a decade worth of funding for projects around the state that had been promised and delayed for decades. Property taxes in Indiana are among the lowest in the nation, having been cut by 30 percent and capped permanently by the voters and by our State Constitution. Along the way, we have lived by a number of simple principles, but atop that list is the fact that Hoosiers know what's best for Hoosiers. We don't ask for, or want, the federal government to interfere with or dictate how we should live our lives. The improvements we have made, together, have come from within, from Hoosiers. We owe a debt of gratitude to Governor Mitch Daniels and Lieutenant Governor Becky Skillman , our dynamic Hoosier duo, who have worked and led to make Indiana a better place to live, work and invest, alongside House Speaker Brian Bosma , Senate President Pro Tempore David Long and our majorities in the House and Senate.
    [Show full text]
  • Mayoral Elections in Indiana 2003–2015 Mayoral Elections in Indiana
    Center for Local Elections in American Politics MayoralMayoral ElectionsElections inin IndianaIndiana 2003–20152003–2015 May 2016 Melissa Marschall John Lappie sustainable so that it can continue to provide data, research and information to scholars, practitioners and policymakers long into the future. By creating a database that updates automatically — and About the Center for Local Elections in constantly — we are able to ensure we have the most current American Politics information available to help researchers, journalists and others effectively study government. While the presidential campaign The Center for Local Elections in American Politics (LEAP) is continues to generate headlines, the heart of democracy is at developing pathbreaking solutions to the problem of collecting, the local level. We believe LEAP’s database will allow us to digitizing and disseminating data on local elections. More better understand the process and outcomes of these elections. information is available at http://www.leap-elections.org/. The United States is viewed as an archetype of democracy, yet fundamental questions about the nature of our government and its electoral processes and outcomes are often difficult to answer because of a simple problem: a lack of data. Because elections are decentralized in this country, basic Rice University’s Kinder Institute for Urban Research is a information about local contests is difficult to access. To date, “think and do” tank that advances understanding of the there has been no comprehensive source of data on U.S. local challenges facing Houston and other urban centers through elections. The situation has vexed political scientists, journalists research, policy analysis and public outreach.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Summary of New Laws
    2018 SUMMARY OF NEW LAWS State Senator Senate District 12 Blake Doriot SECOND REGULAR SESSION AND FIRST SPECIAL SESSION OF THE 120TH INDIANA GENERAL ASSEMBLY 2018 SUMMARY OF NEW LAWS PREPARED BY THE SENATE MAJORITY COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE WITH ASSISTANCE FROM THE SENATE MAJORITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE PREFACE This document is a comprehensive summary of the laws passed by the 2018 Indiana General Assembly. It includes 210 bills passed during the Regular Legislative Session completed on March 14, 2018, and 5 bills passed during the Special Legislative Session held May 14, 2018. The full digest of each passed bill is listed in numerical order in the first section of the document, followed by a table showing all author/sponsor information as well as committee and floor vote totals. The addendum at the back includes information on the General Assembly’s 2018 actions regarding the Governor’s veto of HEA 1523-2017, a listing of 2018 passed bills by the Senate Committees in which they were heard, and public law/bill number conversion charts. Please note that bills from the 2018 Special Session are listed with “-SS” at the end of the bill number throughout this book. Since 4 of the 5 Special Session bills were largely identical to bills that were considered but did not pass during the Regular Session, the listing of 2018 passed bills by Senate Committee includes the Special Session bills under the Committee that heard their Regular Session counterpart bills. For further information concerning 2018 new laws, please contact either the Senate Majority Attorney's Office at (317) 232-9415 or the Legislative Information Center of the Legislative Services Agency at (317) 232-9856.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 State Legislators 01-20-16.Xlsx
    2016 Indiana State Senator Listing by Last Name District First Name Last Name Party Office Number E‐Mail 22 Ron Alting R 317‐232‐9517 [email protected] 8 Jim Arnold D 317‐232‐9532 [email protected] 17 Jim Banks R 317‐232‐9457 [email protected] 39 Eric Bassler R 317‐234‐9443 [email protected] 50 Vaneta Becker R 317‐232‐9494 [email protected] 23 Phil Boots R 317‐234‐9054 [email protected] 37 Rodric Bray R 317‐234‐9426 [email protected] 34 Jean Breaux D 317‐232‐9534 [email protected] 10 John Broden D 317‐232‐9849 [email protected] 15 Liz Brown R 317‐232‐9807 [email protected] 21 Jim Buck R 317‐232‐9466 [email protected] 5 Ed Charbonneau R 317‐232‐9494 [email protected] 28 Michael Crider R 317‐234‐9054 [email protected] 29 Mike Delph R 317‐232‐9541 [email protected] 26 Doug Eckerty R 317‐234‐9466 [email protected] 38 Jon Ford R 317‐234‐9443 [email protected] 13 Susan Glick R 317‐232‐9493 [email protected] 46 Ron Grooms R 317‐234‐9425 [email protected] 18 Randy Head R 317‐232‐9488 [email protected] 7 Brandt Hershman R 317‐232‐9840 [email protected] 19 Travis Holdman R 317‐232‐9807 [email protected] 47 Erin Houchin R 317‐232‐9814 [email protected] 20 Luke Kenley R 317‐232‐9453 [email protected] 14 Dennis Kruse R 317‐233‐0930 [email protected] 25 Tim Lanane D 317‐232‐9427 [email protected] 42 Jean Leising R 317‐234‐9493 [email protected] 16 David Long R 317‐232‐9416 [email protected] 31 James Merritt Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • Indiana State Senate
    A report to supporters and members of Indiana Business for Responsive Government (IBRG), the Indiana Chamber of Commerce, and allied organizations. This report will be updated as additional election results are received in the hours and days following. Another Election for the Record Books in Indiana Indiana Business for Responsive Government (IBRG), the non-partisan political action program of the Indiana Chamber of Commerce, scored a very successful general election. 48 of 49 IBRG- endorsed candidates facing opposition were victorious, including Republicans and Democrats. Forty-three (43) additional endorsed candidates did not face general election challenges. Twelve (12) new legislators won with IBRG-endorsements. IBRG was significantly-engaged in support of six (6) top-target challenger and open-seat races, as well as successfully defending twelve (12) pro-economy incumbents seriously challenged with defeat. In one of the most dramatic turn of events in years, Republicans won significant battles for state legislative seats across the state to expand their “quorum-proof majorities.” These victories were particularly surprising to those working for months closely in campaigns and candidates, as Indiana’s public opinion environment on issues and views of incumbents was - right up until Election Day - about as bad an environment for Republicans and incumbents as seen in years. This marks the third election cycle in a row that Republicans have expanded their margins in the Indiana House and Senate. The Republicans won a net two (2) seat gain in the Indiana House of Representatives to achieve a 71-29 margin. Four (4) incumbent legislators lost reelection bids in the House (one Republican and three Democrats).
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of the United States
    NOS. 07-21, 07-25 In The Supreme Court of the United States WILLIAM C RAWFORD, ET AL., Petitioners, v. MARION COUNTY ELECTION BOARD, ET AL., Respondents. INDIANA DEMOCRATIC PARTY, ET AL., Petitioners, v. TODD ROKITA, ET AL., Respondents. On Writs of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit BRIEF FOR RESPONDENT MARION COUNTY ELECTION BOARD JAMES B. OSBORN JON LARAMORE OFFICE OF CORPORATION COUNSEL Counsel of Record CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS BAKER AND DANIELS 1601 CITY COUNTY BUILDING SUITE 2700 200 EAST WASHINGTON STREET 300 NORTH MERIDIAN ST. INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204 317.327.5432 317.237.0300 [email protected] [email protected] Becker Gallagher · Cincinnati, OH · Washington, D.C. · 800.890.5001 i QUESTION PRESENTED When Indiana’s Voter Identification Statute precludes some otherwise-qualified persons from voting and there is little or no evidence showing the in- person voter impersonation fraud the statute is designed to prevent, what standard should this Court apply in evaluating the constitutionality of the statute? ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page QUESTION PRESENTED.................... i TABLE OF CONTENTS..................... ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES.................. iv STATEMENT ............................. 1 The Marion County Election Board ......... 3 Time-tested systems were in place to detect in- person voter impersonation fraud before the challenged statute was enacted ............ 6 Election accessibility under the Voter Identification Statute .................... 8 Provisional ballots were not counted in the 2007 municipal election because of the Voter Identification Statute .................... 8 No evidence of in-person voter impersonation fraud.................................. 9 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT................ 10 ARGUMENT............................. 11 iii Because the right to vote is vitally important and the evidence of in-person voter impersonation fraud is sparse, the Court should closely scrutinize the statute.............
    [Show full text]
  • State of the Statehouse
    hile elections sometime deliver results that are unexpected (the list is a long one; I’m sure you have your favorite upsets), there are also certain givens leading up to each voting responsibility. Two at the top of the list are: 1. Politicians, or maybe more accurately the people involved in the Wpolitical process, will repeatedly tell us why any election is important. That refrain is amplified in 2010, mostly because it determines who holds the mighty gavel – and pen – the following year. 2. A sea of change is coming, with the party out of power using that mantra to help regain control. The adage applies this time around, but it’s a different type of change than what was experienced two years ago or during the memorable mid-term election of 1994. The Indiana Chamber’s nonpartisan political action committee, Indiana Business for Responsive Government (IBRG), has a focused mission: help elect thoughtful candidates to the Indiana General Assembly who support pro-economy, pro-jobs legislation and initiatives. Jeff Brantley, with 20 years of experience in Indiana in a variety of roles, leads that effort as vice president of political affairs. Kevin Brinegar, Chamber president, has been with this organization for 18 years and involved in the legislative/political process for 30 years. Brinegar uses two key words – power and authority – in addressing topic No. 1. The 2010 election, of course, coincides with the 2010 census. Following the annual people count, the political party that controls the House and Senate in Indiana (and many other states), has the “power and authority to redraw district boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 State Legislators.Xlsx
    2019 Indiana State Senator Listing by Last Name (Updated on 1/7/19) District First Name Last Name Party Office Number** E‐Mail 22 Ron Alting R 317‐232‐9541 [email protected] 39 Eric Bassler R 317‐232‐9453 [email protected] 50 Vaneta Becker R 317‐232‐9494 [email protected] 8 Mike Bohaceck R 317‐232‐9541 [email protected] 23 Phil Boots R 317‐234‐9054 [email protected] 37 Rodric Bray R 317‐232‐9416 [email protected] 34 Jean Breaux D 317‐232‐9534 [email protected] 15 Liz Brown R 317‐232‐9426 [email protected] 7 Brian Buchanan R 317‐234‐9426 [email protected] 21 Jim Buck R 317‐232‐9466 [email protected] 16 Justin Busch R 317‐232‐9466 [email protected] 5 Ed Charbonneau R 317‐232‐9494 [email protected] 24 John Crane R 317‐232‐9984 [email protected] 28 Michael Crider R 317‐234‐9054 [email protected] 12 Blake Doriot R 317‐232‐9808 [email protected] 29 J.D. Ford D 317‐232‐9491 [email protected] 38 Jon Ford R 317‐232‐9517 [email protected] 32 Aaron Freeman R 317‐232‐9490 [email protected] 45 Chris Garten R 317‐232‐9490 [email protected] 26 Mike Gaskill R 317‐234‐9443 [email protected] 13 Susan Glick R 317‐232‐9493 [email protected] 46 Ron Grooms R 317‐234‐9425 [email protected] 18 Randy Head R 317‐232‐9488 [email protected] 19 Travis Holdman R 317‐232‐9453 [email protected] 47 Erin Houchin R 317‐232‐9488 [email protected] 44 Eric Koch R 317‐234‐9425 [email protected] 14 Dennis Kruse R 317‐233‐0930 [email protected] 25 Tim Lanane D 317‐232‐9427 [email protected] 42 Jean Leising R 317‐232‐9493 [email protected] 3 Eddie Melton D 317‐232‐9491 [email protected] 31 James Merritt Jr.
    [Show full text]