A Description and Quantitative Analysis of Artifacts Recovered from Fort Meigs (1813-1815) Wood County, Ohio
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 4-1980 A Description and Quantitative Analysis of Artifacts Recovered from Fort Meigs (1813-1815) Wood County, Ohio John P. Nass Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Nass, John P., "A Description and Quantitative Analysis of Artifacts Recovered from Fort Meigs (1813-1815) Wood County, Ohio" (1980). Master's Theses. 1884. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/1884 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A DESCRIPTION AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF ARTIFACTS RECOVERED FROM FORT MEIGS (1813-1815) WOOD COUNTY, OHIO by John P. Nass, Jr. A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the Degree of Master of Arts Department of Anthropology Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan April 1980 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to acknowledge the assistance and cooperation of many individuals, organizations and institutions, without whose help this thesis could not have been written. Criticisms and comments by members of my thesis committee, consisting of Dr. Elizabeth Garland (major advisor), Dr. Robert Maher and Dr. William Cremim were very helpful in completing this thesis. I am indebted to Dr. Robert Boehm, Mr. Randall Buchman and Mr. Ronald Burdick, The Defiance College, Defiance, Ohio, for their encouragement and assistance. A special thanks is given to Mr. Buchman for inviting me to continue his in itia l research at Fort Meigs, which culminated in selecting Fort Meigs for my thesis topic. In addition, I would like to thank Mr. Marty Overholt, manintenance supervisor at Fort Meigs for his assistance and support during field operations. Mrs. Martha Otto, Chairperson, Department of Archaeology, the Ohio Historical Society was very helpful in securing permission to work at Fort Meigs and allowing access to artifacts recovered between 1972-1977, and the use of these datz for my thesis. Special thanks are in order to Dr. David Stothers and Mr. G. Michael Pratt, Department of Sociology/Anthropology, University of Toledo for their cooperation and encouragement during field work and during the writing of this paper. Mr. Michael Morell, military historian at Fort Meigs, provided valuable comments about m ilitary behavior, dress, and equipment used during the War of 1812. Acknowledgement of the valuable assistance obtained from members of the Toledo Area Aboriginal i i with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Research Association, particularly Mr. Pat Steiner and Mr. Frank Huntly, are also in crder. Technical assistance was provided by Terrance Martin of the Department of Anthropology, Michigan State University, for fauna! identification and Drs. Gordon Grosscup and Arnold P illin g , Wayne State University, for historic ceramic identification. Special thanks is given to Ms. Mara Galens for drawing figures 7-12, for helping with the cataloging of artifacts, and for proofreading the final draft. Mr. Thomas Root from Tom Root Aerial Photography provided the aerial photograph of Fort Meigs used in figure 1. Mr. R. David Hoxie took the splendid a rtifa c t photographs and Mrs. Connie Hicks typed the final draft. Finally, special gratitude is due my parents who provided assistance, inspiration and encouragement during the completion of this report. John P. Nass, Jr. i i i Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. INFORMATION TO USERS This was produced from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or “target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “Missing Page(s)”. If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure you of complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark it is an indication that the film inspector noticed either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, or duplicate copy. Unless we meant to delete copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed, you will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., is part of the material being photo graphed the photographer has followed a definite method in “sectioning” the material. It is customary to begin filming at the upper left hand comer of a large sheet and to continue from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. If necessary, sectioning is continued again—beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. For any illustrations that cannot be reproduced satisfactorily by xerography, photographic prints can be purchased at additional cost and tipped into your xerographic copy. Requests can be made to our Dissertations Customer Services Department. 5. Some pages in any document may have indistinct print. In all cases we have filmed the best available copy. University Micrcxiims International 300 N. ZEEB ROAD. ANN ARBOR. Ml 48106 18 BEDFORD ROW. LONDON WC1R 4EJ, ENGLAND Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1314810 NASS, JOHN PHILLIP, JR. A DESCRIPTION AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF ARTIFACTS RECOVERED FROM FORT HEIGS (1813-1815) HOOD COUNTY, OHIO. WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY, M .A ., 1980 IJpjvejiv M ic rd ra m s intsmcttcnal 3o o n . z e e b r o a d . a n n a r b o r , m i « 8 io 6 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. PLEASE NOTE: In all cases this material has been filmed in the best possible way from the available copy. Problems encountered with this document have been identified here with a check mark . 1. Glossy photographs_______ 2. Colored illustrations_______ 3. Photographs with dark background_______ 4. Illustrations are poor copyS 5. Print shows through as there is text on both sides________ of page 6. Indistinct, broken or small print on several ^pages throughout 7. Tightly bound copy with print lost_______ in spine 8. Computer printout pages with indistinct_______ print 9. Page(s) _ lacking when material received, and not available from school or author_______ 10. Page(s)________seem to be missing in numbering only as text follows_______ 11. Poor carbon copy_______ 12. Not original copy, several pages with blurred_______ type 13. Appendix pages are poor copy ________ 14. Original copy with light ________type 15. Curling and wrinkled pages _______ 16. Other _______________________________________________________ U n iv e rs e MicnSilms International 300 N ZESB RD.. ANN A R 30R . Ml 48106 '3131 761-4700 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS....................................................................................... ii LIST OF TABLES.......................................................................................... vii LIST OF FIGURES........................................................................................ v iii LIST OF MAPS.............................................................................................. ix LIST OF PLATES.......................................................................................... x CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION......................................................................... 1 I I CONCEPTUAL BASE FOR HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY................. 3 I I I DESCRIPTION, HISTORY AND EXCAVATION OF FORT MEIGS. 8 Description .................................................................... 8 Excavation...................................................................... 26 IV ARTIFACT DESCRIPTIONS....................................................... 30 Beads............................................................................... 32 Buckles and Leather/Cloth Hooks............................... 33 Buttons........................................................................... 37 Candle Lantern.............................................................. 49 Candlestick .................................................................... 50 Ceramics ......................................................................... 50 Clothing Fasteners...................................................... 59 Clothing Clips.............................................................. 50 Door Latches .................................................................. 60 iv Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) CHAPTER PAGE Ferrules.................................................................................