DOCSLIB.ORG

593 Part 195—Transportation of Hazardous Liquids By

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
593 Part 195—Transportation of Hazardous Liquids By Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Admin., DOT Pt. 195 Major rivers Nearest town and state 195.2 Definitions. 195.3 What documents are incorporated by Maumee River ....................... Defiance, OH. reference partly or wholly in this part? Maumee River ....................... Toledo, OH. 195.4 Compatibility necessary for transpor- Mississippi River .................... Myrtle Grove, LA. tation of hazardous liquids or carbon di- Mississippi River .................... Woodriver, IL. Mississippi River .................... Chester, IL. oxide. Mississippi River .................... Cape Girardeau, MO. 195.5 Conversion to service subject to this Mississippi River .................... Woodriver, IL. part. Mississippi River .................... St. James, LA. 195.6 Unusually Sensitive Areas (USAs). Mississippi River .................... New Roads, LA. 195.8 Transportation of hazardous liquid or Mississippi River .................... Ball Club, MN. carbon dioxide in pipelines constructed Mississippi River .................... Mayersville, MS. Mississippi River .................... New Roads, LA. with other than steel pipe. Mississippi River .................... Quincy, IL. 195.9 Outer continental shelf pipelines. Mississippi River .................... Ft. Madison, IA. 195.10 Responsibility of operator for compli- Missouri River ........................ Waverly, MO. ance with this part. Missouri River ........................ St. Joseph, MO. 195.11 What is a regulated rural gathering Missouri River ........................ Weldon Springs, MO. line and what requirements apply? Missouri River ........................ New Frankfort, MO. 195.12 What requirements apply to low- Naches River ......................... Beaumont, TX. Ohio River .............................. Joppa, IL. stress pipelines in rural areas? Ohio River .............................. Cincinnati, OH. 195.13 What requirements apply to pipelines Ohio River .............................. Owensboro, KY. transporting hazardous liquids by grav- Pascagoula River .................. Lucedale, MS. ity? Pascagoula River .................. Wiggins, MS. 195.15 What requirements apply to report- Pearl River ............................. Columbia, MS. ing-regulated-only gathering lines? Pearl River ............................. Oria, TX. Platte River ............................ Ogaliala, NE. Potomac River ....................... Reston, VA. Subpart B—Annual, Accident, and Safety- Rappahannock River ............. Midland, VA. Related Condition Reporting Raritan River .......................... South Bound Brook, NJ. Raritan River .......................... Highland Park, NJ. 195.48 Scope. Red River (of the South) ....... Hanna, LA. 195.49 Annual report. Red River (of the South) ....... Bonham, TX. 195.50 Reporting accidents. Red River (of the South) ....... Dekalb, TX. 195.52 Immediate notice of certain acci- Red River (of the South) ....... Sentell Plantation, LA. Red River (of the North) ........ Wahpeton, ND. dents. Rio Grande ............................ Anthony, NM. 195.54 Accident reports. Sabine River .......................... Edgewood, TX. 195.55 Reporting safety-related conditions. Sabine River .......................... Leesville, LA. 195.56 Filing safety-related condition re- Sabine River .......................... Orange, TX. ports. Sabine River .......................... Echo, TX. 195.58 Report submission requirements. Savannah River ..................... Hartwell, GA. 195.59 Abandonment or deactivation of fa- Smokey Hill River .................. Abilene, KS. Susquehanna River ............... Darlington, MD. cilities. Tenessee River ..................... New Johnsonville, TN. 195.60 Operator assistance in investigation. Wabash River ........................ Harmony, IN. 195.61 National pipeline mapping system. Wabash River ........................ Terre Haute, IN. 195.63 OMB control number assigned to in- Wabash River ........................ Mt. Carmel, IL. formation collection. White River ............................ Batesville, AR. 195.64 National Registry of Operators. White River ............................ Grand Glaise, AR. Wisconsin River ..................... Wisconsin Rapids, WI. 195.65 Safety data sheets. Yukon River ........................... Fairbanks, AK. Subpart C—Design Requirements Other Navigable Waters 195.100 Scope. Arthur Kill Channel, NY 195.101 Qualifying metallic components Cook Inlet, AK other than pipe. Freeport, TX 195.102 Design temperature. Los Angeles/Long Beach Harbor, CA 195.104 Variations in pressure. Port Lavaca, TX 195.106 Internal design pressure. San Fransico/San Pablo Bay, CA 195.108 External pressure. 195.110 External loads. 195.111 Fracture propagation. PART 195—TRANSPORTATION OF 195.112 New pipe. HAZARDOUS LIQUIDS BY PIPELINE 195.114 Used pipe. 195.116 Valves. Subpart A—General 195.118 Fittings. 195.120 Passage of internal inspection de- Sec. vices. 195.0 Scope. 195.122 Fabricated branch connections. 195.1 Which pipelines are covered by this 195.124 Closures. part? 195.126 Flange connection. 593 VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:18 Jun 23, 2021 Jkt 250228 PO 00000 Frm 00603 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\250228.XXX 250228 rmajette on DSKBCKNHB2PROD with CFR Pt. 195 49 CFR Ch. I (10–1–20 Edition) 195.128 Station piping. 195.402 Procedural manual for operations, 195.130 Fabricated assemblies. maintenance, and emergencies. 195.132 Design and construction of above- 195.403 Emergency response training. ground breakout tanks. 195.404 Maps and records. 195.134 Leak detection. 195.405 Protection against ignitions and safe access/egress involving floating roofs. Subpart D—Construction 195.406 Maximum operating pressure. 195.408 Communications. 195.200 Scope. 195.410 Line markers. 195.202 Compliance with specifications or 195.412 Inspection of rights-of-way and standards. crossings under navigable waters. 195.204 Inspection—general. 195.413 Underwater inspection and reburial 195.205 Repair, alteration and reconstruc- of pipelines in the Gulf of Mexico and its tion of aboveground breakout tanks that inlets. have been in service. 195.414 Inspections of pipelines in areas af- 195.206 Material inspection. fected by extreme weather and natural 195.207 Transportation of pipe. disasters. 195.208 Welding of supports and braces. 195.415 [Reserved] 195.210 Pipeline location. 195.416 Pipeline assessments. 195.212 Bending of pipe. 195.417–195.418 [Reserved] 195.214 Welding: General. 195.420 Valve maintenance. 195.216 Welding: Miter joints. 195.422 Pipeline repairs. 195.222 Welders and welding operators: Qual- 195.424 Pipe movement. ification of welders and welding opera- 195.426 Scraper and sphere facilities. tors. 195.428 Overpressure safety devices and 195.224 Welding: Weather. overfill protection systems. 195.226 Welding: Arc burns. 195.430 Firefighting equipment. 195.228 Welds and welding inspection: 195.432 Inspection of in-service breakout Standards of acceptability. tanks. 195.230 Welds: Repair or removal of defects. 195.434 Signs. 195.234 Welds: Nondestructive testing. 195.436 Security of facilities. 195.236–195.244 [Reserved] 195.438 Smoking or open flames. 195.246 Installation of pipe in a ditch. 195.440 Public awareness. 195.248 Cover over buried pipeline. 195.442 Damage prevention program. 195.250 Clearance between pipe and under- 195.444 Leak detection. ground structures. 195.446 Control room management. 195.252 Backfilling. 195.254 Above ground components. HIGH CONSEQUENCE AREAS 195.256 Crossing of railroads and highways. 195.258 Valves: General. 195.450 Definitions. 195.260 Valves: Location. PIPELINE INTEGRITY MANAGEMENT 195.262 Pumping equipment. 195.264 Impoundment, protection against 195.452 Pipeline integrity management in entry, normal/emergency venting or high consequence areas. pressure/vacuum relief for aboveground 195.454 Integrity assessments for certain un- breakout tanks. derwater hazardous liquid pipeline facili- 195.266 Construction records. ties located in high consequence areas. Subpart E—Pressure Testing Subpart G—Qualification of Pipeline Personnel 195.300 Scope. 195.302 General requirements. 195.501 Scope. 195.303 Risk-based alternative to pressure 195.503 Definitions. testing older hazardous liquid and carbon 195.505 Qualification program. dioxide pipelines. 195.507 Recordkeeping. 195.304 Test pressure. 195.509 General. 195.305 Testing of components. 195.306 Test medium. Subpart H—Corrosion Control 195.307 Pressure testing aboveground break- out tanks. 195.551 What do the regulations in this sub- 195.308 Testing of tie-ins. part cover? 195.310 Records. 195.553 What special definitions apply to this subpart? Subpart F—Operation and Maintenance 195.555 What are the qualifications for su- pervisors? 195.400 Scope. 195.557 Which pipelines must have coating 195.401 General requirements. for external corrosion control? 594 VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:18 Jun 23, 2021 Jkt 250228 PO 00000 Frm 00604 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\250228.XXX 250228 rmajette on DSKBCKNHB2PROD with CFR Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Admin., DOT § 195.1 195.559 What coating material may I use for facilities used in the transportation of external corrosion control? hazardous liquids or carbon dioxide. 195.561 When must I inspect pipe coating used for external corrosion control? [Amdt. 195–45, 56 FR 26925, June 12, 1991] 195.563 Which pipelines must have cathodic protection? § 195.1 Which pipelines are covered by 195.565 How do I install cathodic protection this Part? on breakout tanks? (a) Covered. Except for the pipelines 195.567 Which pipelines
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 137 Part 195—Transportation of Hazardous Liquids By
    Research and Special Programs Administration, DOT Pt. 195 APPENDIX B TO PART 194ÐHIGH VOLUME Major rivers Nearest town and state AREAS Smokey Hill River .................. Abilene, KS. As of January 5, 1993 the following areas Susquehanna River ............... Darlington, MD. are high volume areas: Tenessee River ..................... New Johnsonville, TN. Wabash River ........................ Harmony, IN. Wabash River ........................ Terre Haute, IN. Major rivers Nearest town and state Wabash River ........................ Mt. Carmel, IL. White River ............................ Batesville, AR. Arkansas River ...................... N. Little Rock, AR. White River ............................ Grand Glaise, AR. Arkansas River ...................... Jenks, OK. Wisconsin River ..................... Wisconsin Rapids, WI. Arkansas River ...................... Little Rock, AR. Yukon River ........................... Fairbanks, AK. Black Warrior River ............... Moundville, AL. Black Warrior River ............... Akron, AL. Brazos River .......................... Glen Rose, TX. Other Navigable Waters Brazos River .......................... Sealy, TX. Catawba River ....................... Mount Holly, NC. Arthur Kill Channel, NY Chattahoochee River ............. Sandy Springs, GA. Cook Inlet, AK Colorado River ....................... Yuma, AZ. Freeport, TX Colorado River ....................... LaPaz, AZ. Los Angeles/Long Beach Harbor, CA Connecticut River .................. Lancaster, NH. Port Lavaca, TX Coosa River ..........................
    [Show full text]
  • The Frequency of Large Hail Over the Contiguous US
    3.3 THE FREQUENCY OF LARGE HAIL OVER THE CONTIGUOUS UNITED STATES Joseph T. Schaefer*, Jason J. Levit, Steven J. Weiss and Daniel W. McCarthy NOAA/NWS/NCEP/Storm Prediction Center, Norman, Oklahoma 1. INTRODUCTION 2. HAIL REPORT COLLECTION PROCESS One of Stan Changnon’s abiding interests is the Hail size is usually reported to the NWS as a frequency and pattern of large hail occurrence. Stan comparison to the size of a common object. NWS started publishing papers in AMS journals on the instructions give a typical size for several of these items occurrence of large hail in 1966. After that initial effort, (NWS, 2003). Table 1 is constructed from the Stan has published 27 papers in AMS journals alone. information in the instructions. When other journals, such as those of the AGU, The table also contains the footnote: Conference Preprints, and Technical Reports are added, Stan has an amazing record of doing productive For many years, dime-size hail was the coin research about a single phenomenon. type associated with 0.75-inch diameter The 1966 paper (Changnon, 1966) was “Note on hailstones. However, the diameter of a dime is Recording Hail Incidences.” In it, Stan showed how 11/16 inch, slightly smaller than a penny, which weighing-bucket rain gauges with their evaporation is 12/16 inch (0.75 inch). funnels removed could be used to record hail occurrence. Since that initial paper, Changnon has This note indicates that for several years “dime devoted considerable effort to finding segregate data size” hail was erroneously considered as the smallest sources for hail observations.
    [Show full text]
  • Rivers Research Guide
    RIVERS RESEARCH GUIDE Herman T. Pott National Inland Waterways Library St. Louis Mercantile Library University of Missouri-St. Louis "The Waterways Journal” Collection and "The Waterways Journal” Index, 1891 – 1914 are available at: http://www.umsl.edu/pott/ Annual Report of the Chief of Engineers to the Secretary of War, 1874 – 1972. Yearly river conditions Wtr Wys TA 23 .A2 Microfilm Bartlett, Richard A. Rolling Rivers: An Encyclopedia of America’s Rivers. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1984. MERC Ref GB 1215 .R64 1984 Bridges Over the Navigable Waters of the United States. Washington, D.C.: United States Army Corps of Engineers, 1961. Wtr Wys TG 23 .A5 1961 v. 1-4 Brown, Samuel R. The Western Gazetteer; Containing a Geographical Description of the Western States and Territories. Auburn, NY: H.C. Southwick, 1817. Rare G 89 5B v. 1 Havighurst, Walter. Voices on the River: The Story of the Mississippi Waterways. New York: Macmillan Co., 1964. MERC Ref HE 630 .M6 H35 1964 Mackenzie, Sir Alexander. Atlas to Mackenzie’s Travels. Rare St. Louis Lyceum G 822 M19 4 Mackenzie, Sir Alexander. Voyages from Montreal, on the River St. Laurence, Through the Continent of North America. Philadelphia: John Morgan, 1802. Rare St. Louis Lyceum G 822 M19 2 Quick, Herbert and Edward Quick. Mississippi Steamboatin’: A History of Steamboating on the Mississippi and its Tributaries. New York: Henry Holt and Co., 1926. MERC Ref VM 623 .Q5 1926 Stine, Jeffrey K. and Michael C. Robinson. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Environmental Issues in the Twentieth Century: A Bibliography.
    [Show full text]
  • Cereal Rust Bulletin
    CEREAL RUST Report No. 1 BULLETIN Date: May 2, 1972 CEREAL RUST LABORATORY UNIVERSITY of MINNESOTA, ST. PAUL, 55101 PLANT PROTECTION PROGRAMS, APHIS, and PLANT SCIENCE RESEARCH DIVISION, ARS, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE J. B. Rowell, Leader (Res. Plant Pathologist) D. V. McVey, Res. Plant Pathologist W. R. Bushnell, Res. Plant Physiologist A. P. Roelfs, Res. Plant Pathologist M. G. Eversmeyer, Res. Plant Pathologist P. G. Rothman, Res. Plant Pathologist A mild winter throughout the southern U.S, was interr~pted only by a single cold period in central Texas. Subsoil moisture was adequate during the winter; however, a dry spring in the Texas-Arkansas area was becoming critical to cereal crops by late April. Widespread showers on April 27 and 28 may have re­ lieved this moisture stress. A cold spring slowed spring planting in the Dakota's and Minnesota. Currently, crops are approximately a week later than normal with little planting done in Minnesota and North Dakota, and wet fields may continue to delay planting. Wheat is generally in the dough stages in north central Texas and south­ ern Alabama, and from central Georgia through the l1ississippi Delta area wheac varies from berry to milk stages. Wheat in Kansas varies from the late boot to heading stage with the exception of the extreme Northwest where the wheat is nor­ mally later~ Oats are generally in the milk stage across the South along the Gulf Coast and north central Texas. Barley is in the mid-dough stages in this same area. Wheat stem rust.--Stem rust overwintered in commercial fields in south Texas (south of Abilene-Waco) ~d in the southern portions of Louisiana, Alabama, and the panhandle of~orida.~pread has generally been within plots and fields with a few exceptions.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis-1975D-T994r.Pdf
    THE RED RIVER IN SOUTHWESTERN HISTORY By CARL NEWTON TYSON Bachelor of "Arts Wichita St~te University Wichita, Kansas 1971 Master of Arts Wichita State University Wichita, Kansas 1973 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY July, 197 5 lk~ 19'15]) T Cj ''-I ri ~ . ..2- I ,, (JKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY LJBRARY MAY 12 1976 THE RED RIVER IN SOUTHWESTERN HISTORY Thesis Approved: Deann of nthe GraduateJP~--= College---- 939015 ii PREFACE Great rivers hold an intriguing ~llurement to the author. Like people, their personalities are changeable; however, unlike people, a river can be radically different at the same time, depending on the po­ sition from which one views it. Cold hearted indeed is the individual who can gaze at a mighty river wending across the earth without feeling twinges of wanderlust. Certainly the author can claim no such grasp of reality. Of all the rivers which grace the North American continent, few have had as varied and significant a history as the Red River. Although less well known than others, such as the Mississippi and the Missouri, the Red has enjoyed a central position in the history of the American West. From the time of the arrival of Redmen in North America to the present, some nation, state, or tribe has cherished the river for its advantages, claimed ownership of it, tried to discover the secrets it held, or tried to change it.. From the beginning of the Franco-.Spanish conflict in the Southwest to the end of the dispute between Texas and Oklahoma in the 1920s, the river was the center of controversy.
    [Show full text]
  • THE GOLD DIGGINGS of CAPE HORN a Study of Life in Tierra Del Fuego and Patagonia by John R. Spears Illustrated G. P. Putnam's So
    THE GOLD DIGGINGS OF CAPE HORN A study of life in Tierra del Fuego and Patagonia by John R. Spears Illustrated G. P. Putnam's Sons New York 27 West Twenty-Third Street London 24 Bedford Street, Strand The Knickerbocker Press 1895 CONTENTS I AFTER CAPE HORN GOLD II THE CAPE HORN METROPOLIS III CAPE HORN ABORIGINES IV A CAPE HORN MISSION V ALONG-SHORE IN TIERRA DEL FUEGO VI STATEN ISLAND OF THE FAR SOUTH VII THE NOMADS OF PATATGONIA VIII THE WELSH IN PATAGONIA IX BEASTS ODD AND WILD X BIRDS OF PATAGONIA XI SHEEP IN PATAGONIA XII THE GAUCHO AT HOME XIII PATAGONIA'S TRAMPS XIV THE JOURNEY ALONG-SHORE LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS MAP OF THE CAPE HORN REGION GOLD-WASHING MACHINES, PARAMO, TIERRA DEL FUEGO PUNTA ARENAS, STRAIT OF MAGELLAN YAHGANS AT HOME (1) THE MISSION STATION AT USHUAIA (1) USHUAIA, THE CAPITAL OF ARGENTINE TIERRA DEL FUEGO (1) AN ONA FAMILY (1) ALUCULOOF INDIANS (1) GOVERNMENT STATION AT ST. JOHN. (FROM A SKETCH BY COMMANDER CHWAITES, A.N.) (1) A TEHUELCHE SQUAW (1) TEHUELCHES IN CAMP (1) GAUCHOS AT HOME AMONG THE RUINS AT PORT DESIRE, PATAGONIA (1) SANTA CRUZ, PATAGONIA (1) THE GOVERNOR'S HOME AND A BUSINESS BLOCK IN GALLEGOS, THE CAPITAL OF PATAGONIA (1) (1) Reproduced by permisson of Charles Scribner's Sons, from an article, by the author of this book, in Scribner's Magazine, entitled "At the end of the Continent." PREFACE I am impelled to say, by way of preface, that the readers will find herein such a collection of facts about the coasts of Tierra del Fuego and Patagonia as an ordinary newspaper reporter might be expected to gather while on the wing, and write when the journey was ended.
    [Show full text]
  • 91 New Cyprinid Fishes of the Genus Notropis from Texas
    1951, No. 1 NEW CYPRINID FISHES FROM TEXAS March 30 91 NEW CYPRINID FISHES OF THE GENUS NOTROPIS FROM TEXAS * CARL L. HUBBS Scripps Institution of Oceanography and KELSHAW BONHAM Applied Fisheries Laboratory University of Washington, Seattle During the past three decades the known freshwater fsh fauna of eastern North America, one of the richest in the world, has been further augmented by the discovery of many new species. Unfortunately, pressure of other duties has prevented the formal naming of a considerable propor- tion of these discoveries. The three new species of Notropis from Texas here treated—ox yrhyncbus, brazosensis and potteri—are among the fishes for which the initial published descriptions have been unduly withheld. Since further delay would interfere with the researches and publications of other ichthyologists and fishery biologists, these species are now diagnosed. The three species are apparently confined to eastern Texas, for they have never been collected in the extensive surveys of surrounding regions, namely northeastern Mexico (Hubbs and Gordon, MS) , New Mexico (sur- vey in progress by William J. Koster), Oklahoma (work begun by Orten- burger and Hubbs, 1926, and Hubbs and Ortenburger, 1929 a-b, and now being continued by George A. Moore) , and Louisiana (more cursory collecting). These shiners, especially oxyrhynchus and brazosensis, abound in the very silty water of the Brazos River and its main tributaries, which are thus shown to have a somewhat distinctive fauna. As native species, N. oxyrhynchus and N. potteri seem to be confined to the Brazos River system (the population of N. potteri currently existing in and about arti- ficial Lake Texoma in the Red River system, between Texas and Oklahoma, is interpreted as the result of the establishment of escaped bait minnows).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2: Natural and Cultural Setting
    Chapter 2: Natural and Cultural Setting Wooten addressed the problem again in 1907 and reported favorably on a dam-only alternative ($100,000). The object of the proposed dam was to save the navigability of the route between Caddo T. Lake ant Jefferson. Although the dam would destroy navigation between Jefferson and Shreveport, a lock court be placed through the dam at a later point and a channel dredged below. The citizens of Jefferson, through their congressional representative, immediately moved to modify the proposal, ant the Rivers ant Harbors Act of March 1909 included provisions for a resurvey to include a lock with the dam. The resulting report by Capt. A F. Waldron favored the modification ant recommended that the dam not be built if the modification were not included. The Rivers and Harbors Act of June 1910 appropriated $100,000 for the dam-only alternative and stipulated that the tam would be built in such a manner as to admit a lock when deemed necessary. The Rivers and Harbors Act of February 1911 initiated another survey to include the lock and downstream dredging. The report by Capt. T. H. Jackson was unfavorable. The dam was completed in December 1914 in the manner directed by Congress, bringing the history of navigation to Jefferson to a close, but with a provision that enabled hope for the resurrection of the waterway to continue. 75 CHAPTER 3 REMOTE-SENSING SURVEY AND DIVER EVALUATION Remote-Sensing Survey Introduction The use of remote-sensing technology in the search for shipwrecks teas become an increasingly common aspect of underwater archaeology in recent years.
    [Show full text]
  • AGU Meeting Presentation Edited 113018.Pdf
    Strategic Distribution of Water Conservation Incentives under Drought-Prone Conditions: A case study in the Red River Basin U.S Hamed Zamani Sabzi1, Rachel Fovargue2, Shabnam Rezapour-Behnagh3, Hernan A. Moreno4, Thomas M. Neeson5 (1, 2, 4, and 5)University of Oklahoma Norman Campus, Department of Geography and Environmental Sustainability, Norman, OK, United States, (3) Florida International University, Department of Engineering and Computing, Miami, FL, United States, AGU 2018 H51H-1411 We want to optimize the water release decisions in all the reservoirs over Abstract Background of Research the planning horizon to simultaneously maximize the average satisfaction levels Many societies around the world face fresh water shortages that require strategic decision making in of the network’s agriculture and municipal sectors and ecosystems. Thus, for allocating resources between human uses and environmental ecosystems. In many regions, water the network model the objective functions are: 푑 퐷퐴푡 σ∀푑∈퐷 σ∀푡∈푇 1− policy makers are investigating potential water conservation plans that rely on incentivizing water 푇퐴푑 Max 푍퐴 = 푡 (16) 푇 . 퐷 users to reduce the consumption rather than governing regulations. However, in large watersheds, 푑 퐷퐹푡 σ∀푑∈퐷 σ∀푡∈푇 1− 푇퐹푑 such as Red River of South (USA) with 38 major dams, finding the most cost-effective locations and Max 푍퐹 = 푡 (17) 푇 . 퐷 appropriate time is a challenging step for water policy makers and conservation planners. In this We now extend the network model to the case where conservation study, we develop a spatiotemporal framework that strategically enables conservation practitioners to organizations wish to incentivize water users to use less water.
    [Show full text]
  • 123 Part 195—Transportation of Hazardous Liquids By
    Research and Special Programs Administration, DOT Pt. 195 (2) Meet 29 CFR 1910.1200 or 49 CFR 172.602. Major rivers Nearest town and state [58 FR 253, Jan. 5, 1993, as amended by Amdt. Sabine River .......................... Edgewood, TX. 194–3, 63 FR 37505, July 13, 1998] Sabine River .......................... Leesville, LA. Sabine River .......................... Orange, TX. APPENDIX B TO PART 194—HIGH VOLUME Sabine River .......................... Echo, TX. AREAS Savannah River ..................... Hartwell, GA. Smokey Hill River .................. Abilene, KS. As of January 5, 1993 the following areas Susquehanna River ............... Darlington, MD. are high volume areas: Tenessee River ..................... New Johnsonville, TN. Wabash River ........................ Harmony, IN. Wabash River ........................ Terre Haute, IN. Major rivers Nearest town and state Wabash River ........................ Mt. Carmel, IL. White River ............................ Batesville, AR. Arkansas River ...................... N. Little Rock, AR. White River ............................ Grand Glaise, AR. Arkansas River ...................... Jenks, OK. Wisconsin River ..................... Wisconsin Rapids, WI. Arkansas River ...................... Little Rock, AR. Yukon River ........................... Fairbanks, AK. Black Warrior River ............... Moundville, AL. Black Warrior River ............... Akron, AL. Brazos River .......................... Glen Rose, TX. Other Navigable Waters Brazos River .......................... Sealy,
    [Show full text]
  • The Queen's Lady in Texas
    East Texas Historical Journal Volume 6 Issue 2 Article 5 10-1968 The Queen's Lady in Texas Marilyn M. Sibley Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ethj Part of the United States History Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Recommended Citation Sibley, Marilyn M. (1968) "The Queen's Lady in Texas," East Texas Historical Journal: Vol. 6 : Iss. 2 , Article 5. Available at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ethj/vol6/iss2/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the History at SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in East Texas Historical Journal by an authorized editor of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. East Texas Historical Journal 109 THE QUEEN'S LADY IN TEXAS EDITED BY MAlULYN MCADAMS SmLEY "Vhen the Honorable Amelia Matilda Murray, maid of honor to Queen Vic~ toria, arrived in New Orleans in 1855 on a grand tour of the United States, Canada, and Cuba, she determined to pay a visit to Texas. "You will think me adventurous to undertake tllis," she wrote friends in England, 'out these new countries are so interesting to a person fond of Natural History and fine scenery, that onc makes up one's mind to undergo some inconvenience and difficulty."! With that the sixty~year-old Miss Murray boamed the steamer Louisiana for Galveston. Arriving on April l6, she began a ten~day swing through Texas which took her by steamer up Buffalo Bayou to Houston, by stage coach to Washing~ ton, Independence, Huntsville, Crockett, Nacogdoches, and thence to Natchi~ taches, Louisiana, where she took a steamboat back to New Orleans.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Inventory of the Cartographic Records of the Soil Conservation Service
    . ' Preliminary Inventory of the Cartographic Records of the Soil Conservation Service National Archives & Records Service PI 195/RG 114 General Services Administration ' . Preliminary Inventory of the cartographic Records of the Soil Conservation Service Record Group 114 Compiled by William J. Heynen National Archives & Records Service General Services Administration Washington 1981 . ' Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data United States. National Archives and Records Service. Preliminary inventory of the cartographic records of the Soil Conservation Service. (Preliminary inventory / National Archives & Records Service ; 195) Includes indexes. 1. United States. Soil Conservation Service-­ Archives--Catalogs. 2. Soil-surveys--United States-­ Bibliography•-Catalogs. 3. United States., National Archives .and Records Service--Catalogs. I. Heynen, William J. II. Title. III. Series: United States. National Archives and Records Service. Preliminary inventory ; 195. CD3026.A32 no. 195 016.3530082'326 81-3988 [ CD3038] AACR2 ' ' . Foreword The General Services Administration, through the National Archives and Records Service, is responsible for administering the permanently valuable noncurrent records of the Federal Government. These archival holdings, now amounting to more than 1 million cubic feet, date from the days of the First Continental Congress and consist of the basic records of the legislative, judicial, and executive branches of our Government. The Presidential libraries of Herbert Hoover, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Harry S. Truman, Dwight D. Eisenhower, John F. Kennedy, Lyndon B. Johnson, and Gerald R. Ford contain the papers of those Presidents and of many of their associates in office. These research resources document significant events in our Nation's history, but most of them are preserved because of their continuing practical use in the ordinary processes of government, for the protection of private rights, and for the research use of scholars and students.
    [Show full text]