Promoting Sociological Research Toolkit Proof

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Promoting Sociological Research Toolkit Proof Promoting Sociological Research: A Toolkit Compiled by the American Sociological Association’s Task Force on Social Media Promoting Sociological Research: A Toolkit Compiled by the American Sociological Association’s Task Force on Social Media Edited by Matt Wray, Jessie Daniels, & Tina Fetner American Sociological Association Published under Creative Commons license (by attribution, non-commercial, no derivatives) Suggested Citation: Wray, Matt, Jessie Daniels, Tina Fetner, eds., 2016. Promoting Sociological Research: A Toolkit. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association. Table of Contents Part I — Social Media and You: An Overview Page Why Should I Bother with Social Media, Anyway? Jessie Daniels …………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 5 Part II — Interviews with Engaged Public Sociologists The Sociological Cinema Website Lester Andrist …………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 10 Speaking to the Press Stephanie Coontz ..…………………………………………………………………………………………………. 14 The Society Pages Website Douglas Hartmann and Letta Wren Page ……….………………………………………………………. 20 Building Your Audience Through Social Media Dustin Kidd ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 27 Using Social Media to Promote Your Book Alondra Nelson ………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 30 Sociology Source Website Nathan Palmer ….……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 34 On-Camera Interviews CJ Pascoe ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 36 Sociological Images Website Lisa Wade …..…………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 43 Part III — Best Practices and Practical Advice 2 Four Authors on Promoting Your Book Part I: Annette Lareau .…………………………………………………………………………………………. 48 Part II: Abigail Saguy .……………………………………………………………………………………………. 52 Part III: Elizabeth Armstrong & Laura Hamilton .……………………………………………………. 54 Trade or Academic Press? Dalton Conley ...……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 58 From Tweet to Blog Post to Peer-Reviewed Article Jessie Daniels ....……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 61 Using Facebook to Promote Your Research Roberto Gonzalez …………………………………………………………………………………………………. 64 Podcasting Heidi Knoblauch ..…………………………………………………………………………………………………. 67 Promoting Your Research with Social Media Arielle Kuperberg …………………………………………………………………………………………………. 69 Writing Op-Eds Tressie McMillan Cottom………………………………………………………………………………………. 75 Using RSS Michael Miller …...…………………………………………………………………………………………………. 77 Using Twitter Tyson Smith ……...…………………………………………………………………………………………………. 80 Sociology on the Radio Matt Wray ………..…………………………………………………………………………………………………. 85 Part IV — Dealing with Public Attacks Supporting Scholars Who Come Under Attack Eric Anthony Grollman .….……………………………………………………………………………………. 89 Who Do You Think You Are? When Marginality Meets Micro-celebrity Tressie McMillan Cottom ….…………………………………………………………………………………. 100 Acknowledgements .….……………………………………………………………………………………. 115 3 Part I: Social Media and You: An Overview 4 Why Should I Bother with Social Media, Anyway? Jessie Daniels, Hunter College The shortest, simplest answer to the question “why should I bother?” is “You don’t have to.” Really, you don’t have to be on television if CNN calls. You don’t need a Twitter account. But, there are some reasons you might want to do these things. Here are just a few. Using social media can facilitate: 1. Establishing yourself as an expert 2. Conceptualizing and developing ideas 3. Developing a reputation for your thoughts, ideas and interactions 4. Building relationships 1. Establishing Your Expertise Few argue that social media engagement as currently used, measured and regarded can replace traditional methods of developing subject-matter expertise. However, providing expert context for discussions in the public domain can establish a broader profile for individual academics and the profession. Using blogs to discuss your research can also help establish you as an expert. One plus is the turnaround time for writing a blog is so much faster than for traditional publications that we can respond to events in the news more quickly, making sociology seem more relevant. Blogs like Huffington Post (with 1.8 million “likes”) can also be useful for sociologists to get the word out about their own work and to discuss past and current events that may be germane to those in their area. For example, the recent stories about racial profiling, Florida’s stand your ground and the Michael Dunn shooting of a black teenager can serve as a vehicle for discussion among others in their areas or to those with an interest in this issue. Sociologists can maintain a blog that documents their experiences at their respective career stages and include tips and suggestions for folks. In this way, they simultaneously share their work, their experience in the academic labor process, and offer tips and suggestions (that they did try or wish they had tried). I find this especially useful as sometimes our particular departments are less experienced with particular topics or journals that other folks are and hearing from them creates a large virtual community that one is able to tap into. 2. Conceptualizing and Developing Ideas Writing (and especially pre-writing) for academic audiences is often an extended affair. Conference presentations and networking is a traditional method of soliciting valuable feedback as we develop concepts and ideas. Working through concepts through social media is another way to refine one’s thinking. Additionally, many academics find that distilling their thinking through forced platform constraints (140 characters or a blog post) clarifies their scholarly writing. As more academics and subject matter experts use 5 social media, peer groups tend to develop organically. These networks of strong and weak ties provide deeper, broader audiences for feedback and divergent thinking. 3. Developing a Reputation Developing a professional reputation is closely aligned with developing expertise. However, the audiences/publics may differ in meaningful ways. Scholars from various sub-disciplines report media, lecture, and consulting opportunities as a benefit of establishing expertise in the public domain. Twitter contains a wealth of resources for academics. The word limit on Twitter would compel academics to think through their “tweets” before “tweeting.” The ability to interact with a large community of scholars (in various stages of their career) is particularly useful for sociologists. Their ongoing conversation covers a range of topics that are frequently interjected with relevant citations and references. In addition, Twitter has the capacity to convene an interdisciplinary discussion surrounding a particular topic. Importantly, the topics are not limited to scholars and frequently engage activists, community leaders, and organizations into the conversation. One quick example is the Michael Dunn Trial, which became “#dunntrial” on Twitter – in this way anyone who desired to be included in the conversation simply included the respective hashtag (#dunntrial) in their “tweet” or message. This conversation covered a range of subtopics that included race, gender, class, etc. can also be useful for others such as history, economics, and the legal apparatus in general. In a similar way, conferences are “live tweeted” with a particular hashtag and scholars unable to attend said conferences are still able to follow interesting conversations and panels. This is quite interesting. One recent example is the “live tweeting” of the American Studies Association’s debate–and ultimately, affirmative decision to join the– boycott, divests, and sanctions (BDS) movement against settler projects on Palestinian land. Finally, sociologists–and social scientists in general–have the opportunity to utilize Twitter in conjunction with other platforms to narrate stories or record responses to stories. Here, I am thinking about Storify, an app that helps users compile a set of tweets that function to tell a story or assist in compiling evidence of what particular people said about a particular topic. Many times, rather than abstract storytelling, Storify is used to reconstruct a particular event (usually a controversial one) so that a person can carefully analyze how the event unfolded and the (potential) implications. Still other times, this can be used to “freeze” a particular conversation “in time” and archive it for later reference. Twitter is a particularly useful tool to advance through various stages of the academic labor process, but also as a resource to tap into a larger community of interdisciplinary scholars who offer critical feedback and lead to collaborations that might otherwise be difficult to achieve. It definitely should not be used to replace traditional avenues of mentorship and collegiality in academic departments, but instead as a complementary avenue. For sociologists in general, Twitter offers the opportunity to engage as scholars with a community but also, Twitter offers itself as a site for inquiry and investigation. For 6 me, the potential for academic scholars–particularly those interested in social justice and activism–is too great to minimize and much less to ignore. 4. Building Relationships Social media creates opportunities for networking, community building and collaboration. Not only can these connections generate publications and further thinking, but it can also create safe spaces for peer support. It is possible to have an account with Twitter that is used solely for networking and public sociology efforts. The followers can be all fellow academics,
Recommended publications
  • Uva-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) “API-Based Research” or How can Digital Sociology and Journalism Studies Learn from the Facebook and Cambridge Analytica Data Breach Venturini, T.; Rogers, R. DOI 10.1080/21670811.2019.1591927 Publication date 2019 Document Version Accepted author manuscript Published in Digital Journalism Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Venturini, T., & Rogers, R. (2019). “API-Based Research” or How can Digital Sociology and Journalism Studies Learn from the Facebook and Cambridge Analytica Data Breach. Digital Journalism, 7(4), 532-540. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1591927 General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:28 Sep 2021 “API-based research” or how can digital sociology and journalism studies learn from the Cambridge Analytica affair Tommaso Venturini & Richard Rogers How to cite Venturini, Tommaso, and Richard Rogers.
    [Show full text]
  • Matthew W. Hughey
    MATTHEW W. HUGHEY University of Connecticut, Department of Sociology Unit 1068, 344 Mansfield Road, Storrs, CT 06269, USA Office: 1.860.486.3364 [email protected] | www.matthewhughey.com EDUCATION Degrees and Graduate Certificates University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA 2009 Doctor of Philosophy, Sociology Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA 2002 Master of Education, Cultural Studies 2002 Certificate of Advanced Graduate Study, Women’s Studies University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, USA 1999 Bachelor of Arts, Sociology Additional Coursework University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA 2020 “Introduction to American Law” Johns Hopkins University, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA 2020 “COVID-19 Contact Tracing” ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS Primary Academic Appointments University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA 2020-present Professor, Department of Sociology 2013-2020 Associate Professor, Department of Sociology 2019-present Affiliate Faculty, Sustainable Global Cities Initiative 2018-present Affiliate Faculty, Graduate Certificate and Masters in Race, Ethnicity, & Politics (REP) 2017-present Affiliate Faculty, Institute for Collaboration on Health, Intervention, & Policy (InCHIP) 2014-present Affiliate Faculty, American Studies Program 2013-present Affiliate Faculty, Africana Studies Institute Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS, USA 2009-2013 Assistant Professor, Department of Sociology 2009-2013 Affiliate Faculty, African American Studies Program 2009-2013 Affiliate Faculty,
    [Show full text]
  • Tressie-Mcmillan-Cottom-CV-Fall
    TRESSIE MCMILLAN COTTOM, Ph.D. Department of Sociology Virginia Commonwealth University 827 West Franklin Street, Founder’s Hall, Office 224 Richmond, VA. 23284 (804) 828-0734 | [email protected] http://www.tressiemc.com http://www.thickthebook.com ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS Associate Professor 2019 - Present Department of Sociology, Virginia Commonwealth University Faculty Affiliate 2015 - Present Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society, Harvard University Assistant Professor 2015 - 2019 Department of Sociology, Virginia Commonwealth University EDUCATION Laney Graduate School, Emory University | 2015 Doctor of Philosophy, Emory College of Arts and Sciences, Department of Sociology Dissertation: Becoming Real Colleges in the Financialized Era of U.S. Higher Education Committee: Richard Rubinson (chair), Irene Browne, Cathy Johnson, Roberto Franzosi, Carol Anderson North Carolina Central University | 2009 Bachelor of Arts, English and Political Science PUBLICATIONS | Books McMillan Cottom, Tressie. 2019. THICK: And Other Essays. New York: The New Press. • National Book Award, Finalist for Non-fiction, 2019 • Brooklyn Public Library Literary Prize, Shortlist for Non-fiction, 2019 • New York Times Editor’s Choice McMillan Cottom, Tressie. 2017. Lower Ed: The Troubling Rise of For-Profits. New York: The New Press. • Translation, Traditional Chinese: McMillan Cottom, Tressie. 2019. Dījí Jiàoyù 低級教育. Taipei City, Taiwan: Hizashi Publishing. PUBLICATIONS | Edited Volumes McMillan Cottom, Tressie and William, Darity A., Jr., eds. 2016. For-Profit U: The Growing Role of For- Profit Colleges in U.S. Higher Education. Palgrave MacMillian. Gregory, Karen, McMillan Cottom, Tressie, and Daniels, Jessie eds. 2016. Digital Sociologies. UK Bristol Policy Press. Dr. Tressie McMillan Cottom 2 PUBLICATIONS | Articles Siddiqi, A., Sod-Erdene, O., Hamilton, and McMillan-Cottom, T.
    [Show full text]
  • Images of Technology in Sociology: Computer As Butterfly and Bat Joerges, Bernward
    www.ssoar.info Images of Technology in Sociology: Computer as Butterfly and Bat Joerges, Bernward Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Zur Verfügung gestellt in Kooperation mit / provided in cooperation with: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB) Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Joerges, B. (1990). Images of Technology in Sociology: Computer as Butterfly and Bat. Technology and Culture, 31(2), 203-227. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-54819-4 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY Lizenz (Namensnennung) zur This document is made available under a CC BY Licence Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden (Attribution). For more Information see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/1.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/deed.de Images of Technology in Sociology: Computer as Butterfly and Bat BERN WARD JOERGES More than fifty years have passed since Robert Merton formulated, in his doctoral dissertation on Science, Technology and Society in Seventeenth-Century England, what he later, in his “Shandean Post­ script,” came to call the “kindle cole” principle: the “sociological discovery of the distorting effects of public (as distinct from private) polemics among men of science.”1 According to the kindle cole (or “Hooke-Newton-Merton”) principle of scientific polemics, scientists ought to avoid engaging in public controversies and try to insulate themselves from the responses of the
    [Show full text]
  • Mitigate That Impact, Empowering Faculty to Create More Welcoming, Inclusive Classrooms
    mitigate that impact, empowering faculty to create more welcoming, inclusive classrooms. She will also meet with Black women students for an informal breakfast Q&A, serving as a role model of Black, female excellence and providing a unique opportunity for students to engage with a leading scholar in an intimate setting. Finally, in an evening lecture and book signing open to all of campus and the public, and free to attend, Dr. McMillan Cottom will speak about her recent collection, THICK: and Other Essays, a Black women’s cultural bible which intertwines the personal, social, and political. Success of this project will be measured by attendance at each event and level of speaker/audience interaction. This proposal connects to several important goals of the University and of Women of Excellence. Bringing Dr. McMillan Cottom to campus will support Xavier’s goal to promote diversity education, scholarship, and culturally responsive teaching, and uphold the social justice ethos at the heart of our Jesuit values. These events will bring together constituent groups—students, alumni, faculty, staff, and community members—in critical conversations about gender and race and also honor and extend the legacies of women and women of color who have been historically underrepresented at Xavier, and in our communities and world. In addition, hosting such a prominent scholar as Dr. McMillan Cottom will enhance the reputation of Xavier University as a leader on issues of gender, racial, and class diversity. NARRATIVE Please provide a detailed project description (in #1) and answer the questions below (#2 - #8) Limit the length of your answers (including project description) to three single-spaced, typed pages.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae May, 2021
    Daniel T. Buffington Daniel Taylor Buffington Curriculum Vitae May, 2021 Office Address: Contact Info: 122 Bear Hall Department of Sociology and Criminal Justice 910.962.3434 (office) University of North Carolina Wilmington [email protected] 601 South College Road EXPERIENCE 2015-present Associate Professor, Department of Sociology and Criminology, University of North Carolina-Wilmington 2019-present Sociology Undergraduate Track Coordinator, Department of Sociology and Criminology, University of North Carolina-Wilmington 2015-2018 Graduate Program Coordinator, Department of Sociology and Criminology, University of North Carolina-Wilmington 2009- 2015 Assistant Professor, Department of Sociology and Criminology, University of North Carolina-Wilmington 2009 Part-time Instructor, Department of Sociology, University of Georgia EDUCATION 2008 Ph.D. Sociology, University of Georgia Dissertation: “Watching the World Cup American Style: Race, Nationality, and Gender in the World’s Game” Committee: Linda Grant (chair), Jim Dowd, and Patricia Richards Comprehensive Exam Area: Inequality (Race, Class, and Gender) 2003 M.A. Sociology, University of Georgia 1999 B.A. Anthropology and Art History, University of New Mexico, Magna Cum Laude REASEARCH AND TEACHING INTERESTS Race & Ethnicity Culture Sociology of Sport Media and Mass Communication International Migration and National Identity Nations, Nationality, and Globalization Intersection of Race, Class, and Gender Social Problems 1 Daniel T. Buffington PUBLICATIONS 2019 Buffington, D. The Global Migration of Soccer Players. Lexington Press 2019 Buffington D., Errante C., and K Godwin. “Increases in Income Inequality” Class Activity published in TRAILS: Teaching Resources and Innovations Library for Sociology. Washington DC: American Sociological Association. (http://trails.asanet.org) 2017 Buffington, D. “Blacks are naturally good athletes": The Myth of a Biological Basis for Race.” In Stephanie M.
    [Show full text]
  • Joanna R. Pepin Phone: (206) 366-5952 Personal Website: Joannapepin.Com [email protected]
    Joanna R. Pepin Phone: (206) 366-5952 personal website: joannapepin.com [email protected] Curriculum Vitae July 2018 ACADEMIC POSITIONS 2018 NICHD Postdoctoral Fellow, Population Research Center, University of Texas at Austin (beginning September 2018) EDUCATION 2018 PhD Sociology, University of Maryland Dissertation – Inequality and the Household Economy Comprehensive Exams – Gender, Work, & Family; Social Inequality & Mobility 2014 MA Sociology, University of Maryland 2006 MS Human Development and Family Studies, Colorado State University Concentration in Marriage and Family Therapy 2004 BS Human Development and Family Studies, Colorado State University PUBLICATIONS REFEREED JOURNAL ARTICLES Forth. Pepin, Joanna R. Beliefs about Money in Families: Balancing Unity, Autonomy, and Gender Equality. Conditionally accepted at Journal of Marriage and Family. Forth. Cohen, Philip N. and Joanna R. Pepin. Unequal Marriage: The Incidence of Marriage among Black and White Women across Marriage Markets, 2009-2011. Forthcoming in Socius. 2018 Pepin, Joanna R., Liana C. Sayer, and Lynne M. Casper. Marital Status and Mothers’ Time Use: Child Care, Housework, Leisure, and Sleep. Demography 55:107–133. Population Association of America Poster Award (2015) 2018 Pepin, Joanna R., and David A. Cotter. “Separating Spheres? Diverging Trends in Youth’s Gender Attitudes about Work and Family.” Journal of Marriage and Family 80:7–24. Media Exposure: [NYTimes] [Time Magazine] [WashPost] [CCF] [Life Science] [Deseret News] [Slate] 2017 Passias, Emily, Liana Sayer, and Joanna R. Pepin. “Who Experiences Leisure Deficits? Mothers’ Marital Status and Leisure Time.” Journal of Marriage and Family 79:1001–1022. 2016 Pepin, Joanna R. “Nobody’s Business? White Male Privilege in Media Coverage of Intimate Partner Violence.” Sociological Spectrum 36:123-141.
    [Show full text]
  • Compiled by Dustin Kidd, [email protected], @Popculturefreak, Dustinkidd.Net
    Compiled by Dustin Kidd, [email protected], @PopCultureFreak, dustinkidd.net SOCIAL MEDIA TIP SHEET USING SOCIAL MEDIA TO PROMOTE YOUR RESEARCH Make a Pinterest board for each of your major interests. Fill it with articles, images, videos, memes, and visual data. To avoid paying fees to put images in a book or article, place publicly available images on Pinterest and include the link in your publication. Make a YouTube playlist for each of your major interests. Whenever you see a related video, add it to the playlist. Make a Spotify playlist about one or more of your topics. Upload your best PowerPoint slides to SlideShare. Consider using Prezi for presentations and make your account public. Create a Prezi to promote each article, or a set of prezis to promote a book. Design them so other professors can use them to discuss your work (making them more likely to assign it). Create a Facebook page for your books, major research projects, student programs, and community engagement programs. Find or create a Google community for peers in your field. If you struggle with using Google + or if you feel the audience is minimal, set it up to automatically populate from your tweets and other social media accounts. Follow your peers on Twitter. ‘At’ (@) them with your ideas and questions. Respond to their tweets about your topic. Find peers by searching keywords on Twitter. For example, search “family sociology” to find scholars who study kinship. Help others find your work by adding hashtags. For example, add #familysociology to your relevant tweets. Create a Twitter “list” specific to your interests.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    TRESSIE MCMILLAN COTTOM | curriculum vitae Virginia Commonwealth University 827 West Franklin Street Founder’s Hall Office 224 Richmond VA 23284 [email protected] | (804) 828-0734 www.tressiemc.com ACADEMIC EXPERIENCE | employment & education Assistant Professor, Department of Sociology, Virginia Commonwealth University, 2015-present Faculty Affiliate, Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society, Harvard University, 2015-present Ph.D., Sociology, Emory University (2015) Dissertation: Becoming Real Colleges in the Financialized Era of U.S. Higher Education. Committee: Richard Rubinson (chair), Carol Anderson, Irene Browne, Roberto Franzosi, Cathy Johnson B.A., English and Political Science, N.C. Central University (2009) PUBLICATIONS | book McMillan-Cottom, Tressie. 2017. Lower Ed: The Troubling Rise of For-Profits. New York: The New Press. PUBLICATIONS | edited volumes McMillan Cottom, Tressie and William Darity, Jr., eds. 2017. For-Profit U: The Growing Role of For-Profit Colleges in U.S. Higher Education. Palgrave McMillan. Gregory, Karen, Tressie McMillan Cottom, and Jessie Daniels, eds. 2016. Digital Sociologies. UK Bristol Policy Press. PUBLICATIONS | articles McMillan-Cottom, T. & Angulo, A. In Press. “BLM: A Radical 21st Century Education Policy Platform”, Harvard Journal of Black Public Policy. McMillan-Cottom, T., Johnson, J., Stamm, T., & Honnold, J. In Press. “A Vision Among Challenges: Lessons about Online Teaching from the First Online Master’s Degree in Digital Sociology.” The Journal of Public and Professional Sociology. McMillan-Cottom, T. 2016. “Having It All Is Not A Feminist Theory of Change.” Signs. 42(2):2-6. McMillan-Cottom, T. 2016. “More Scale, More Questions: Observations on Textual Analysis From Sociology.” In Gold M. & Klein L. (Eds.), Debates in the Digital Humanities (pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Introducing Digital Sociology
    INTRODUCING DIGITAL SOCIOLOGY Deborah Lupton Department of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Sydney 10 July 2013 Acknowledgement: This document is an earlier version of material that will be published as: Lupton, Deborah (forthcoming) Digital sociology. In Germov, John and Poole, Marilyn (eds), Public Sociology: An Introduction to Australian Society. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin. This book chapter will have additional teaching material added for its final version. The version here presented may be cited as: Lupton, Deborah (2013) Introducing digital sociology. Sydney: University of Sydney. 1 Introduction: the digital age Digital technologies have become central to the lives of most people living in developed countries and increasing numbers of those in the developing world. Since the introduction of personal computers in the early 1980s and the internet in the early 1990s, those technologies – variously referred to as ‘information communication technologies’ (ICTs) or ‘cyber technologies’ and now frequently called ‘digital technologies’ or ‘the new digital media’ – have reached into many dimensions of everyday life, affecting family and intimate relationships, leisure activities, paid work, education, commerce and the ways in which mass media are presented and consumed. New digital media technologies have had a profound influence on everyday life and social relations for many people in developed societies, and increasingly in developing societies. People across the globe have becoming linked together by digital media and networks
    [Show full text]
  • Visual Social Media and Big Data. Interpreting Instagram Images Posted on Twitter
    Visual Social Media and Big Data Interpreting Instagram Images Posted on Twitter Dhiraj Murthy, Alexander Gross, Marisa McGarry Abstract Social media such as Twitter and Instagram are fast, free, and multi- cast. These attributes make them particularly useful for crisis commu- nication. However, the speed and volume also make them challenging to study. Historically, journalists controlled what/how images repre- sented crises. Large volumes of social media can change the politics of representing disasters. However, methodologically, it is challenging to study visual social media data. Specifically, the process is usually labour-intensive, using human coding of images to discern themes and subjects. For this reason, Studies investigating social media during crises tend to examine text. In addition, application programming interfaces (APIs) for visual social media services such as Instagram and Snapchat are restrictive or even non-existent. Our work uses images posted by Instagram users on Twitter during Hurricane Sandy as a case study. This particular case is unique as it is perhaps the first US disaster where Instagram played a key role in how victims experi- enced Sandy. It is also the last major US disaster to take place before Instagram images were removed from Twitter feeds. Our sample con- sists of 11,964 Instagram images embedded into tweets during a two- week timeline surrounding Hurricane Sandy. We found that the pro- duction and consumption of selfies, food/drink, pets, and humorous macro images highlight possible changes in the politics of representing disasters – a potential turn from top-down understandings of disas- ters to bottom-up, citizen informed views.
    [Show full text]
  • Toward a World Beyond Gender: a Utopian Vision Barbara J. Risman
    Toward a World Beyond Gender: A Utopian Vision Barbara J. Risman University of Illinois at Chicago Judith Lorber Brooklyn College and Graduate Center, City University of New York Jessica Holden Sherwood University of Rhode Island Prepared for the 2012 American Sociological Society Meetings. We thank Erik Olin Wright for inviting our participation in a presidential plenary about utopian visions for society. We thank Rachel Allison, Amy Brainer, Pallavi Banerjee and Georgiann Davis for their comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript. 1 2 Any utopian essay, even one based on social science expertise, is necessarily and explicitly a value-laden normative project. As invited participants of the American Sociological Association‘s 2012 ―Envisioning Real Utopias‖ project, we fully embrace this kind of ―emancipatory social science‖ (Wright 2010). As avowedly feminist scholars, we are part of an intellectual community birthed by a social movement. We have always stayed close to our feminist roots, with an explicit goal to do work that helps transform the world toward one in which gender inequality does not exist (Lorber 1994, 2005, Risman 1998, 2004). Following Wright‘s distinction between social and political justice (Wright 2010), feminists of all stripes would probably agree that whatever one‘s sexual identity and gender practices, everyone should have the (social) freedom to choose their own paths as separate persons and the (political) freedom to join collectively with others to affect their broader community. We will proceed presuming
    [Show full text]