NTL and Telewest Global UBS Media Conference

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

NTL and Telewest Global UBS Media Conference NTL and Telewest Global UBS Media Conference December 7, 2005 1 Forward-Looking Statements Certain statements in this document regarding the proposed transaction between ntl Incorporated (“ntl”) and Telewest Global, Inc. (“Telewest”), the expected timetable for completing the transaction, future financial and operating results, benefits and synergies of the transaction, future opportunities for the combined company and products, ntl’s potential offer for Virgin Mobile Holdings (UK) plc, and any other statements regarding Telewest's or ntl's future expectations, beliefs, goals or prospects constitute forward-looking statements as that term is defined in the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. When used in this document, the words "believe", "anticipate", "should", "intend", "plan", "will", "expects", "estimates", "projects", "positioned", "strategy", and similar expressions or statements that are not historical facts, in each case as they relate to ntl and Telewest, the management of either such company or the proposed transaction, are intended to identify those expressions or statements as forward-looking statements. In addition to the risks and uncertainties noted in this document, there are certain factors, risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated by some of the statements made, many of which are beyond the control of ntl and Telewest. These factors relating to the transaction between ntl and Telewest include: (1) the failure to obtain and retain expected synergies from the proposed transaction, (2) rates of success in executing, managing and integrating key acquisitions, including the proposed acquisition, (3) the ability to achieve business plans for the combined company, (4) the ability to manage and maintain key customer relationships, (5) delays in obtaining, or adverse conditions contained in, any regulatory or third-party approvals in connection with the proposed acquisition, (6) availability and cost of capital, (7) the ability to manage regulatory, tax and legal matters, and to resolve pending matters within current estimates, (8) other similar factors, and (9) the risk factors summarized and explained in our Form 10-Ks. For additional information concerning factors that could cause actual results to materially differ from those projected herein, please refer to our most recent Form 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K reports. 2 James Mooney Chairman, NTL 3 Creating the Triple Play Leader • Building a Leader – Transforming scale & competitiveness of UK Cable • Access to 12.6m homes, over 50% of UK households • £3.4bn in revenues and £1.2bn in OCF – Triple play champion • Wide range of communication, entertainment and information products • Enhanced ability to compete with BSkyB, BT and Freeview • Focus on product differentiation and innovation • Driving Value – delivering synergies of £1.5bn NPV – Strengthen scale and eliminate duplicated activities – Significantly cash accretive 4 Transaction Summary • Terms – TLWT shareholders to receive $16.25 in cash and 0.115 NTL shares • Cash / stock mix 68% / 32% – Financing fully committed by existing cash and £1.8bn debt – Customary closing conditions, including • Shareholder approval • Satisfactory regulatory outcome • Expected Timeline (subject to change as dependent on regulatory timings) Proxy Filed OFT SEC Shareholder If cleared by If 2nd stage Decision Clearance Meetings OFT: December December January / February / Close Possible Close February March March April/May 5 Best of Breed Operational Organization Lisa Stephen TBC Neil Jacques Bryan Keith Opie Cook SVP Berkett Kerrest Hall Monserrat MD SVP Strategy COO CFO General Director Flextech Bus Dvpt Counsel Comms & Policy Neil Smith Deputy CFO Stephen Peter Philip Steve Howard Beynon Wilcock Snalune Upton Watson MD MD MD MD Networks CTO Business Customer Consumer Sales/Service Products NTL TBC Carolyn TBC Mike TLWT MD Walker MD Riddle Marketing MD, HR Logistics CIO New 6 Cable’s Triple Play Strengths Expertise • Ten years of triple play experience • Expertise in marketing and selling bundles • Triple play institutionalized into customer care, installers engineers, billing, finance etc • These customers have higher ARPU and lower churn Scale Technology • 30% triple play penetration growing fast • End-to-end state-of-the-art network • Scale to leverage content acquisition control and hardware/software purchase • No reliance on BT or peer-to-peer • 2.7m VOD capable digital STBs, fully • Up to 750 Mhz bandwidth funded and already in customer homes • Migration to digital drives • Robust telephony service already in revenue/capacity 4.2m customer homes • Range of advanced TV services – VOD, DVR, HDTV 7 Bundling Advantage Triple Play Penetration Growth Subscriber breakdown 30% BB only 0.3m TV only 0.3m 25% Telephony only 0.7m 20% BB & Telephony 0.6m 15% TV & Telephony 1.5m 10% Triple Play 5% 1.5m 0% 2003 2005 Triple-play customers have higher ARPU and margin and lower churn 8 Broadband Leadership 2.6 (1) 2.6 UK Broadband subs UK Cable Broadband subs 2.4 (millions) 2.2 (millions) 2.0 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.2 1.2 1.1 0.9 1.0 0.8 0.8 UK Cable NTL BT Retail AOL Telew est Wanadoo Tiscali Q103 Q203 Q303 Q403 Q104 Q204 Q304 Q404 Q105 Q205 Q305 • More growth to come – UK internet penetration 62% – UK broadband penetration 32% • Compete effectively on service quality, speed and tactical promotions – End-to-end network ownership – Increasing speeds up to 10Mb with potential for further upgrades – Content packages/upgrade paths (eg security suites) provide future growth opportunities (1) Includes 174k virgin.net subscribers. 9 TV Strengthened by New Services Increasing TV capability to differentiate from Sky, Freeview, BT and DSL. Cable is the only platform with the full range of TV services, including free-to-air, basic, premium, VOD, DVR and HDTV UK multi-channel TV market Combined TV penetration of 26% (millions) • 7.5 • Market leader in multichannel TV in area - ahead of Sky and Freeview (1) 5.2 • Combined digital penetration of 80% • New services add competitive strengths and 3.3 underpin ARPU potential 1.9 1.3 – VOD: 57% of digital TV base today 0.5 0.0 – DVR: Launch in Q1-06 Sky UK Cable NTL Telew est DSL Freeview Freesat – HDTV: Launch in Q1-06 Pay Free-to-air (1) UBS estimates that approximately 20% of Freeview’s subscribers are using the service as a secondary multichannel television offering. 10 Telephony Migrating to Fixed Pricing Plans UK Cable Talk subscribers (m) • Combined telephony penetration of 35% 1,600 • Second in addressable areas, after BT Retail 1,400 • Compete effectively on service quality and 1,200 bundled pricing 1,000 • Seeking to counter usage declines by migration to flat rate packages 800 – Strengthens gross margin – Improves predictability of revenue 600 • Robust telephony service is important part 400 of bundle 200 0 2002 2005 11 ARPU Differences in UK Cable NTL Telewest Difference* ARPU £39.08 £45.17 £6.09 RGU/Customer 1.96 2.14 £2.98 Broadband lower tier 71% 49% £0.65 Digital Penetration 73% 91% £1.17 Talk Penetration 29% 39% £0.92 Analogue TV only areas £1.16 Other (£0.79) Merged company to adopt best of breed consistent strategies * ARPU Difference assumes NTL had same KPI as Telewest at Q3-05 12 ARPU Initiatives & Best Practice for UK Cable • Continued growth in triple play penetration and RGU/customer – Bundled marketing and promotions – Sales commission structure to emphasis bundle – Cross-sell to existing customers • Migrating telephony customers to higher ARPU Talk plans • Increased TV capability – VOD, DVR and HDTV • Continued migration from analogue to digital • Upsell and mix initiatives • Take fully loaded cash flow view ensuring attractive cash flow economics • Application of tight and consistent credit policy • Customer segmentation analysis • Centers of Excellence to improve customer experience 13 Leverage Merged Network for Business Growth • Second in addressable areas for 10.9 2004 Business Revenues profitability and cashflow • Compete effectively on service quality – Locally based account managers 2.3 • Leverage consumer network – Deeper local network so carry more traffic on-net Produce stronger cashflow and margin 0.8 – 0.5 0.4 0.3 • Focus on on-net traffic, data and value 0.3 added services • Merged Business division will have Colt NTL Thus C&W greater access to on-net business, BT Telewest Business increasing reach, scale, competitiveness UK Cable UK and margin 14 Strategically Valuable Content Assets • Wholly owned Flextech channels – LIVINGtv, Trouble, Bravo and Challenge on NTL, Telewest and Sky – Advertising revenue up 29% and subscription revenue up 10% • 50:50 UKTV JV with the BBC – 10 branded channels with exclusive access to key BBC content – Significantly cash generative with £28m paid to Telewest year-to-date • Sit-up – Two main auction channels with price-drop auction format – Transactional revenue up 16% although margins being squeezed • Currently investigating strategic options – Retain 100% ownership – Strategic partnerships – Partial divestment for potential de-leveraging 15 Possible Transaction with Virgin Mobile • As you have all read in the news, NTL announced a potential transaction which would involve acquiring Virgin Mobile and entering into a license arrangement with Virgin Enterprises • NTL will not provide any comments on the proposed transaction beyond the information provided in its press release • Any such transaction is governed by UK Takeover Panel Rules and US securities laws and
Recommended publications
  • Towards Quadruple-Play Service: Both Individual and Household Level Analyses on Mobile Bundle
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Yu, Eun; Jung, Jaemin Conference Paper Towards Quadruple-Play Service: Both Individual and Household Level Analyses on Mobile Bundle 29th European Regional Conference of the International Telecommunications Society (ITS): "Towards a Digital Future: Turning Technology into Markets?", Trento, Italy, 1st - 4th August, 2018 Provided in Cooperation with: International Telecommunications Society (ITS) Suggested Citation: Yu, Eun; Jung, Jaemin (2018) : Towards Quadruple-Play Service: Both Individual and Household Level Analyses on Mobile Bundle, 29th European Regional Conference of the International Telecommunications Society (ITS): "Towards a Digital Future: Turning Technology into Markets?", Trento, Italy, 1st - 4th August, 2018, International Telecommunications Society (ITS), Calgary This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/184972 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Marginable OTC Stocks
    List of Marginable OTC Stocks @ENTERTAINMENT, INC. ABACAN RESOURCE CORPORATION ACE CASH EXPRESS, INC. $.01 par common No par common $.01 par common 1ST BANCORP (Indiana) ABACUS DIRECT CORPORATION ACE*COMM CORPORATION $1.00 par common $.001 par common $.01 par common 1ST BERGEN BANCORP ABAXIS, INC. ACETO CORPORATION No par common No par common $.01 par common 1ST SOURCE CORPORATION ABC BANCORP (Georgia) ACMAT CORPORATION $1.00 par common $1.00 par common Class A, no par common Fixed rate cumulative trust preferred securities of 1st Source Capital ABC DISPENSING TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ACORN PRODUCTS, INC. Floating rate cumulative trust preferred $.01 par common $.001 par common securities of 1st Source ABC RAIL PRODUCTS CORPORATION ACRES GAMING INCORPORATED 3-D GEOPHYSICAL, INC. $.01 par common $.01 par common $.01 par common ABER RESOURCES LTD. ACRODYNE COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 3-D SYSTEMS CORPORATION No par common $.01 par common $.001 par common ABIGAIL ADAMS NATIONAL BANCORP, INC. †ACSYS, INC. 3COM CORPORATION $.01 par common No par common No par common ABINGTON BANCORP, INC. (Massachusetts) ACT MANUFACTURING, INC. 3D LABS INC. LIMITED $.10 par common $.01 par common $.01 par common ABIOMED, INC. ACT NETWORKS, INC. 3DFX INTERACTIVE, INC. $.01 par common $.01 par common No par common ABLE TELCOM HOLDING CORPORATION ACT TELECONFERENCING, INC. 3DO COMPANY, THE $.001 par common No par common $.01 par common ABR INFORMATION SERVICES INC. ACTEL CORPORATION 3DX TECHNOLOGIES, INC. $.01 par common $.001 par common $.01 par common ABRAMS INDUSTRIES, INC. ACTION PERFORMANCE COMPANIES, INC. 4 KIDS ENTERTAINMENT, INC. $1.00 par common $.01 par common $.01 par common 4FRONT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • FCC-06-11A1.Pdf
    Federal Communications Commission FCC 06-11 Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Annual Assessment of the Status of Competition ) MB Docket No. 05-255 in the Market for the Delivery of Video ) Programming ) TWELFTH ANNUAL REPORT Adopted: February 10, 2006 Released: March 3, 2006 Comment Date: April 3, 2006 Reply Comment Date: April 18, 2006 By the Commission: Chairman Martin, Commissioners Copps, Adelstein, and Tate issuing separate statements. TABLE OF CONTENTS Heading Paragraph # I. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................. 1 A. Scope of this Report......................................................................................................................... 2 B. Summary.......................................................................................................................................... 4 1. The Current State of Competition: 2005 ................................................................................... 4 2. General Findings ....................................................................................................................... 6 3. Specific Findings....................................................................................................................... 8 II. COMPETITORS IN THE MARKET FOR THE DELIVERY OF VIDEO PROGRAMMING ......... 27 A. Cable Television Service ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Time Warner Cable Inc. and 10-Q, Quarterly Report of Time Warner Cable Inc
    FILED 7-02-15 04:59 PM EXHIBITA1507009 E: Form 10-K, Annual Report of Time Warner Cable Inc. and 10-Q, Quarterly Report of Time Warner Cable Inc. TIME WARNER CABLE INC. FORM 10-K (Annual Report) Filed 02/13/15 for the Period Ending 12/31/14 Address 60 COLUMBUS CIRCLE, 17TH FLOOR NEW YORK, NY 10023 Telephone 212-364-8200 CIK 0001377013 Symbol TWC SIC Code 4841 - Cable and Other Pay Television Services Industry Broadcasting & Cable TV Sector Services Fiscal Year 12/31 http://www.edgar-online.com © Copyright 2015, EDGAR Online, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Distribution and use of this document restricted under EDGAR Online, Inc. Terms of Use. Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 Form 10-K ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 Commission file number 001-33335 TIME WARNER CABLE INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 84-1496755 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 60 Columbus Circle New York, New York 10023 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) (212) 364-8200 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Name of each exchange on which Title of each class registered Common Stock, par value $0.01 New York Stock Exchange 5.750% Notes due 2031 New York Stock Exchange 5.250% Notes due 2042 New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
    [Show full text]
  • AMÉRICA MÓVIL, S.A.B. DE C.V. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
    As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 24, 2017 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, DC 20549 FORM 20-F Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 Commission file number: 1-16269 AMÉRICA MÓVIL, S.A.B. DE C.V. (exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) America Mobile (translation of registrant’s name into English) United Mexican States (jurisdiction of incorporation) Lago Zurich 245, Plaza Carso / Edificio Telcel, Colonia Ampliación Granada, Delegación Miguel Hidalgo, 11529, Mexico City, México (address of principal executive offices) Daniela Lecuona Torras, Telephone: (5255) 2581-4449, E-mail: [email protected] Facsimile: (5255) 2581-4422, Lago Zurich 245, Plaza Carso / Edificio Telcel, Piso 16, Colonia Ampliación Granada, Delegación Miguel Hidalgo, 11529, Mexico City, México (name, telephone, e-mail and/or facsimile number and address of company contact person) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class: Name of each exchange on which registered: A Shares, without par value New York Stock Exchange L Shares, without par value New York Stock Exchange 5.625% Notes Due 2017 New York Stock Exchange 5.000% Senior Notes Due 2019 New York Stock Exchange 5.000% Senior Notes Due 2020 New York Stock Exchange 3.125% Senior Notes Due 2022 New York Stock Exchange 6.375% Notes Due 2035 New York Stock Exchange 6.125% Notes Due 2037 New York Stock Exchange
    [Show full text]
  • Chicago Board Options Exchange Annual Report 2001
    01 Chicago Board Options Exchange Annual Report 2001 cv2 CBOE ‘01 01010101010101010 01010101010101010 01010101010101010 01010101010101010 01010101010101010 CBOE is the largest and 01010101010101010most successful options 01010101010101010marketplace in the world. 01010101010101010 01010101010101010 01010101010101010 01010101010101010 01010101010101010 01010101010101010ifc1 CBOE ‘01 ONE HAS OPPORTUNITIES The NUMBER ONE Options Exchange provides customers with a wide selection of products to achieve their unique investment goals. ONE HAS RESPONSIBILITIES The NUMBER ONE Options Exchange is responsible for representing the interests of its members and customers. Whether testifying before Congress, commenting on proposed legislation or working with the Securities and Exchange Commission on finalizing regulations, the CBOE weighs in on behalf of options users everywhere. As an advocate for informed investing, CBOE offers a wide array of educational vehicles, all targeted at educating investors about the use of options as an effective risk management tool. ONE HAS RESOURCES The NUMBER ONE Options Exchange offers a wide variety of resources beginning with a large community of traders who are the most experienced, highly-skilled, well-capitalized liquidity providers in the options arena. In addition, CBOE has a unique, sophisticated hybrid trading floor that facilitates efficient trading. 01 CBOE ‘01 2 CBOE ‘01 “ TO BE THE LEADING MARKETPLACE FOR FINANCIAL DERIVATIVE PRODUCTS, WITH FAIR AND EFFICIENT MARKETS CHARACTERIZED BY DEPTH, LIQUIDITY AND BEST EXECUTION OF PARTICIPANT ORDERS.” CBOE MISSION LETTER FROM THE OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN Unprecedented challenges and a need for strategic agility characterized a positive but demanding year in the overall options marketplace. The Chicago Board Options Exchange ® (CBOE®) enjoyed a record-breaking fiscal year, with a 2.2% growth in contracts traded when compared to Fiscal Year 2000, also a record-breaker.
    [Show full text]
  • The Transition to Digital Television*
    DIGITAL TELEVISION 1 The Transition to Digital Television* Jérôme Addaa and Marco Ottavianib University College London; London Business School This paper studies the role of economic policy for the transition from analogue to digital television, with particular attention to the switch off of the analogue terrestrial signal. The analogue signal cannot be credibly switched off until almost all viewers have migrated to digital, due to universality of access to television. But before switch off, only part of the population can be reached with the digital signal. In addition, those who are reached need to spend more to upgrade their reception equipment than after switch off, because the capacity to increase the power of the digital signal will be made available only then. After reviewing the competitive structure and the role of government intervention in television markets, we present the early experience of a number of industrialised countries in the transition to digital television. We then formulate a micro-econometric model of digital television adoption by individual viewers. The model is calibrated to UK data and simulated to predict the impact of government policies on the take up of digital television. Policy makers can affect the speed of take up of digital television by: (i) controlling the quality of the signals and the content of public service broadcasters; (ii) intervening in the market for digital equipment with subsidies; and (iii) publicising the conditions and date of switch off of the analogue signal. We find that if the analogue terrestrial signal is switched off conditionally on aggregate adoption, strategic delays possibly arise and expectations affect the success of the switch off policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Direct Investment in Latin America and the Caribbean Alicia Bárcena Executive Secretary
    2010 Foreign Direct Investment in Latin America and the Caribbean Alicia Bárcena Executive Secretary Antonio Prado Deputy Executive Secretary Mario Cimoli Chief Division of Production, Productivity and Management Ricardo Pérez Chief Documents and Publications Division Foreign Direct Investment in Latin America and the Caribbean, 2010 is the latest edition of a series issued annually by the Unit on Investment and Corporate Strategies of the ECLAC Division of Production, Productivity and Management. It was prepared by Álvaro Calderón, Mario Castillo, René A. Hernández, Jorge Mario Martínez Piva, Wilson Peres, Miguel Pérez Ludeña and Sebastián Vergara, with assistance from Martha Cordero, Lucía Masip Naranjo, Juan Pérez, Álex Rodríguez, Indira Romero and Kelvin Sergeant. Contributions were received as well from Eduardo Alonso and Enrique Dussel Peters, consultants. Comments and suggestions were also provided by staff of the ECLAC subregional headquarters in Mexico, including Hugo Beteta, Director, and Juan Carlos Moreno-Brid, Juan Alberto Fuentes, Claudia Schatan, Willy Zapata, Rodolfo Minzer and Ramón Padilla. ECLAC wishes to express its appreciation for the contribution received from the executives and officials of the firms and other institutions consulted during the preparation of this publication. Chapters IV and V were prepared within the framework of the project “Inclusive political dialogue and exchange of experiences”, carried out jointly by ECLAC and the Alliance for the Information Society (@lis 2) with financing from the European
    [Show full text]
  • Discovery Communications to Launch First Channel on Freeview in UK
    Discovery Communications to Launch First Channel on Freeview in UK October 17, 2008 - Company Wins Competitive Auction for Position on SDN Multiplex - LONDON, Oct. 17 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Discovery Communications today announced it has secured a channel position on Freeview, the UK's digital terrestrial television (DTT) platform. The deal with UK multiplex operator, SDN Ltd, a wholly owned subsidiary of ITV plc, will see the channel launch in early 2009. (Logo: http://www.newscom.com/cgi-bin/prnh/20080918/NETH035LOGO ) The channel will draw upon Discovery Communications' vast library of high-quality factual, entertainment and lifestyle programming and also includes scripted acquisitions especially for the new channel. Discovery Communications launched its first international channel in the UK in 1989. The UK business has grown to a robust portfolio of 11 pay-TV channels available through SKY, Virgin Media and other platforms. David Zaslav, president and CEO of Discovery Communications, said, "Discovery Communications is very proud to bring its first channel to Freeview. Our first international channel launched in the UK nearly 20 years ago and the company always has been 'platform neutral' in its distribution strategy. Discovery Communications' Freeview channel will both complement and enhance our offerings and portfolio position in the critical UK market." Dan Brooke, managing director of Discovery Networks UK, added, "The UK now has the most competitive and diverse TV market in the world and the launch of a Freeview channel is an important element in expanding consumer reach. We have talked to Freeview viewers: they love our programming, and once they have sampled it, we are confident they will want to experience the richness and variety of our content on other media platforms." Jeff Henry, managing director, ITV Consumer, said: "SDN is delighted to be working with Discovery Communications to enhance Freeview's channel offering even further.
    [Show full text]
  • 12/FINAL Working Party on Telecommunication And
    Unclassified DSTI/ICCP/TISP(2005)12/FINAL Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Economiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 07-Apr-2006 ___________________________________________________________________________________________ English - Or. English DIRECTORATE FOR SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INDUSTRY COMMITTEE FOR INFORMATION, COMPUTER AND COMMUNICATIONS POLICY Unclassified DSTI/ICCP/TISP(2005)12/FINAL Working Party on Telecommunication and Information Services Policies MULTIPLE PLAY: PRICING AND POLICY TRENDS English - Or. English JT03207142 Document complet disponible sur OLIS dans son format d'origine Complete document available on OLIS in its original format DSTI/ICCP/TISP(2005)12/FINAL FOREWORD This report was presented to the Working Party on Telecommunication and Information Services Policies in December 2005 and was declassified by the Committee for Information, Computer and Communications Policy in March 2006. The report was prepared by Mr. Yoshikazu Okamoto and Mr. Taylor Reynolds of the OECD’s Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry. It is published under the responsibility of the Secretary- General of the OECD. © OECD/OCDE 2006 2 DSTI/ICCP/TISP(2005)12/FINAL TABLE OF CONTENTS MAIN POINTS.............................................................................................................................................. 6 Regulatory issues........................................................................................................................................ 7 INTRODUCTION
    [Show full text]
  • Download (PDF)
    FEDERAL REGULATION AND COMPETITIVE ACCESS TO MULTIPLE-UNIT PREMISES: MORE CHOICE IN COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES? LYNNE HOLT* & MARK JAMISON** I. INTRODUCTION The nature of competition in the United States’ communications sector changed significantly over the past two decades. Before the 1990s, ‘‘competition’’ referred to the fight among providers of discrete services, such as the contest among AT&T, MCI, and Sprint over the long- distance slice of the communications pie. Today, competition is much more likely to describe the fight over the entire pie, among firms offering a ‘‘triple play’’ of services----high-speed Internet service, video, and t e l e p h o n y ----over a single broadband platform. Some firms recently expanded the pie with a ‘‘quadruple play’’ that includes wireless services as well. Cable operators, traditional wireline telephone companies, and, increasingly, wireless providers are competing to offer consumers both the underlying broadband platform and various bundled services that ride across it. However, not all consumers benefit from this competition in like manner.1 Public policy deliberations tend to focus more on differences in access to communications services either between consumers in rural and * Dr. Lynne Holt, Policy Analyst, Public Utility Research Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-7142, [email protected]. ** Dr. Mark A. Jamison, Director, Public Utility Research Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-7142, [email protected]. The authors appreciate the review by Mr. William Cox, Able Band Chartered, and his suggestions for improving an earlier version of this paper. 1. For example, the staff of the New York Public Service Commission found differences between geographic areas in terms of the competitive alternatives that customers enjoyed.
    [Show full text]
  • Teachers Call for More Internet Access in the Classroom Submitted By: Speed Communications Tuesday, 29 August 2006
    Teachers call for more internet access in the classroom Submitted by: Speed Communications Tuesday, 29 August 2006 ·Study by ntl:Telewest Business reveals teachers believe the internet helps pupils regardless of ability ·37% of teachers believe the internet has made a dramatic impact on exam results Almost half of UK teachers (49 per cent) would like to use the internet more than they currently do in lessons, according to a national study published by ntl:TelewestBusiness (http://www.business.ntl.com ) today. The study indicates that although 78 per cent of teachers use the internet in class at least once a week, and 42 per cent at least once a day, the positive benefits that it brings to pupils means that teachers feel increased internet access would help pupils even further. The impact the internet has had in the class room is wide ranging. Thirty-seven per cent of teachers felt the internet had made a dramatic impact on exam results, nearly nine out of ten felt pupils were more interested in lessons and a majority felt it helped both slow learners (80 per cent) and brighter pupils (73 per cent). ntl:Telewest Business which provides broadband services (http://www.business.ntl.com) to more than 10,000 schools across the UK, as well as many further and higher educational establishments, has seen an increase in broadband take-up for schools in 2006. With Department for Education and Skills (DfES) guidelines suggesting primary schools should have 2Mb bandwidth and secondary schools 8Mb by the end of the year, almost six out of ten teachers believe their school has reached those targets.
    [Show full text]