Policy Paper

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Policy Paper December 2015 1 POLICY PAPER Slovakia Single market Zsolt Gál . This paper is published in the framework of the project “Visegrad in the EU – How Much Do We Matter?”, whose aim is to assess the impact of the V4 countries on the EU policy making. The project is a result of the cooperation of the EUROPEUM Institute for European Policy (Czech Republic), Institute of Public Affairs (Poland) Institute for Foreign Affairs and Trade (Hungary) and Slovak Foreign Policy Association (Slovakia) and is supported by the International Visegrad Fund. December 2015 2 Summary The free movement of labour was rather a success in spite of the fact that Slovakia had little (if any) influence over the decision of the old member states to open Taking into account that Slovakia has been their labour markets without using transitional restrictions a responsible policy-taker and the formation of clear (up to maximum seven years). The labour flows from preferences and priorities regarding EU issues have been Slovakia were relatively intensive and their overall economic very limited. Thus, using a broader concept in the field of effect was positive, especially on the domestic labour the single market, we identified the following main market where they helped to mitigate high unemployment. priorities: In the field of energy security the picture is rather Drawing EU funds – maximizing the use of mixed, there are some achievements but no large financial resources from the common EU budget. improvements. Ensuring convergence – converging to the EU-15 in terms of economic development, living standards The overall picture of Slovak performance shows and quality of life by using the opportunities of the a responsible policy taker country (with still single market and the sources of EU funds. an impressive record of formal transposition of EU Gaining free access to the labour markets – legislation) which rarely comes out with its own initiatives, opening up the labour markets of other EU members has very few preferences one can clearly recognise and (especially the EU-15) to the largest possible extent sometimes even its official positions on actual EU issues are as soon as possible. missing. Energy security – support for the creation of a common energy policy; support of diversification There was only one example of a policy driver and energy solidarity while maintaining the attitude in the field of energy policy, the failed attempt of sovereignty over the energy mix and opposing the Czech-Slovak-EU initiative, the European Nuclear further liberalization. Energy Forum (ENEF) – which lacked significant results. Regarding the achievements (successes and failures) Slovakia resembles a policy killer (at least partially) we can conclude the following: only in two areas. The first is the fight against the European Commission’s third energy liberalization package in The use of EU funds has been a clear failure as it 2008, when Slovakia, as a part of a wider coalition, has been neither transparent nor effective so far. managed to weaken the originally proposed unbundling solution (i.e. the division of gas and electricity distribution Economic convergence is probably the greatest and supply networks). success story of the whole accession process. However, we argue that EU membership was not the main reason behind The second would be resistance against the Slovakia’s remarkable achievements – it was “just” harmonization of income taxes and social policies. a necessary precondition for the birth of the ‘Tatra tiger”. But here the plans never materialised, so there was no The main reason behind the fast convergence was legislative proposal on the table to oppose. It is also a comprehensive package of deep structural reforms important to note that the rejection of tax and social policy between 2002 and 2006. Taking into account that most harmonization is mostly a right-wing agenda in Slovakia. reforms were dismantled and abolished since, the future of Therefore it is not a widely shared consensual position of convergence is doubtful. Indeed the fast catching up the country, just a priority on the part of political elites process had stopped from the beginning of the crisis (2009), (Malová et al. 2005: 9-10). But that part of elites usually FDI inflows radically declined, employment is far below its presents its fierce opposition to harmonization quite loudly. pre-crisis peak and public debt has increased dramatically. For example, the short-lived centre right Radičová December 2015 3 government stated in its Manifesto that: “The Government (including the fostering of common energy policy) clearly supports the preservation of Member States’ strengthen its bargaining position vis-a-vis main suppliers, sovereignty in economic and social policies, where it does especially the Russian Federation. not clearly conflict with the needs of the single market… The Government will not give its consent to European tax harmonisation in the area of income tax” (Civic… 2010: 7, 9). Considering the future preferences and challenges the main areas are consistent with the ones of previous ten Preferences, what preferences? years. It is a hard task to search for Slovak preferences and The transparent and effective use of EU funds priorities in the EU integration process. The non-existing remains the largest and most important challenge written official EU membership strategy is only the less ahead together with the restart of the convergence process. important explanation, since there are very few mentions of Here, bold decisions (cutting of the EU funds from the preferences in other official documents as well. Quite often domestic corruption machinery around public procurements, it is even hard to find out a clear Slovak (government) deep, sometimes unpopular structural reforms) are needed. position during the negotiations on various issues within Otherwise, Slovakia might fall into the Middle Income Trap the Union. To put it simply, Slovakia used to go with and stagnate around its current level of development. the crowd during its first 10 years as an EU member. It has Deeper integration into the single market might be helpful been a typical policy taker country, which is barely coming here but its potential results are quite limited. The V4 forward with its own initiative, nor is it trying to block the countries already benefited from the liberalization of proposals with majority support. Slovakia has been most markets; in particular, the opening of monopolized sectors often interested in the deepening of the integration (e.g. energy, telecommunication and aviation) to processes rather than remaining outside (usually for pure competition with positive effects on consumers (Erste… pragmatic reasons) and trying to behave as a good student 2014: 10). In Slovakia there is still some room for higher doing an excellent job in formal transposition and competition in the energy sector and rail passenger implementation of EU law. The rather passive application of transport which remained almost untouched by new legal acts usually occurred without much controversy liberalization. (within the political elite) or even public attention at home. Taking into account the rising criticism of the free Of course this is not a unique experience, most new movement of people in a number of member states, member states (NMS) have a very similar record. renewed efforts are needed to defend the free access An analysis by the Comenius University’s Department of to labour markets. Slovakia should, in co-operation with Political Science “confirmed the predominance of a reactive others, insist on the unquestionable character of the free policy style in the NMS and occasional examples of other movement of labour within the EU. Parallel to this, the strategies employed only in strategically important issues domestic labour market needs to become more attractive and/or matters related to national identity and security” for Slovak migrants and encourage them to return home. (Malová – Lisoňová 2010: 176). Otherwise, there is an increasing risk that a high share of There are quite a few reasons why new members temporary or circular migration will turn to permanent generally and Slovakia particularly were rather silent, emigration and Slovakia is going to lose a significant part of constructive policy consumers: its most active and productive citizens. In the field of energy security, Slovakia with its regional (especially V4) partners, should continue to diversify its energy imports and with increased co-operation December 2015 4 1. The trauma of being left out European currency and termination of the transitional Due to the series of undemocratic decisions by the periods for the free movement of workers, Slovakia has populist prime minister, Vladimír Mečiar, and his attained the maximum degree of integration” (Manifesto… governments between 1992 and 1998; initially Slovakia was 2012: 6). lagging behind its neighbours in the Euro-Atlantic integration process (Nič et al. 2014: 4). Especially under Vladimir Mečiar’s third government (1994-1998) Slovakia 2. The legacy of the pre-accession became a “deviant” case among new democracies in Central negotiations and the completion of Europe (Szomolányi 1999, 2004). Slovakia’s accession to the accession process the OECD was postponed in 1996 due to a lag in market The strong effort to catch up with the neighbouring reforms and unlike its V4 neighbors, it was not invited to countries intensified the ‘natural’ asymmetric position of NATO and to the first round of EU accession negotiations in Slovakia during the accession process: the candidate 1997. Regarding the latter decision, the shameful reason country should take over the acquis communitaire and the was that Slovakia was the only candidate who failed to meet European Commission is controlling it. Under this ‘take it or the political criteria (MZVEZ SR 2014: 6). A danger of leave it’ principle, there is not much space for domestic becoming “a black hole in the heart of Europe” (warning by discussion or formation of preferences; and the Madeleine Albright, then the U.S.
Recommended publications
  • Slovakia in the EU: an Unexpected Success Story?
    DGAPanalyse Prof. Dr. Eberhard Sandschneider (Hrsg.) Otto Wolff-Direktor des Forschungsinstituts der DGAP e. V. May 2014 N° 6 Slovakia in the EU: An Unexpected Success Story? by Milan Nič, Marek Slobodník, and Michal Šimečka This paper is published as part of the research project "Central European Perspectives – Integra- tion Achievements and Challenges of the V4 States after Ten Years in the EU", supported by the strategic grant of the International Visegrad Fund. Project Partners: Central European Policy Institute (CEPI), Bratislava|Slovakia Asociace pro Mezinárodní Otázky (AMO) / Association of International Affairs, Prague|Czech Republic Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem, Társadalomtudományi Kar (ELTE TÁTK) / Eötvös Loránd University Budapest, Faculty of Social Sciences, Budapest|Hungary Fundacja im. Kazimierza Pułaskiego (FKP) / Casimir Pulaski Foundation, Warsaw|Poland The German Council on Foreign Relations does not express opinions of its own. The opinions expressed in this publication are the responsibility of the author. DGAPanalyse 6 | May 2014 Summary Slovakia in the EU: An Unexpected Success Story? by Milan Nič, Marek Slobodník, and Michal Šimečka Slovakia has emerged as an unlikely success story of the 2004 EU enlargement. The country’s first decade as a member state was marked by robust growth – spur- red by pro-market reforms of the early 2000s – and relative economic resilience and political stability during the global economic crisis. Thematic priorities on the EU level have included cohesion policy, energy, EU enlargement, and the Euro- pean Neighborhood Policy (ENP). Slovak diplomacy has seen regional groupings – above all the Visegrad format – as the most effective way of pursuing its policy preferences. As the only eurozone member in the Visegrad Group (V4), Slovakia remains a reliable if somewhat passive supporter of deeper European integration, supporting a fiscally responsible approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Energy Demand Report
    Slovak Regional Study Analysis on the energy demand of Trnava Region under the framework of CENTRAL EUROPE Programme by Italian – Slovak Chamber of Commerce This analysis was made as a part of CEP -REC project work package 3 to giv e an overview on the Slovak Trnava Region’s energy demand profile. Table of contents Methodology ...................................................................................................................................................... 2 1. General description of the current situation of the region ......................................................... 3 1.1 Description of the Concept Region ............................................................................................... 3 1.2 Demographic situation and development ................................................................................. 5 1.2.1 Demographic situation of the Concept Region ..................................................................... 5 1.2.2 Migration ........................................................................................................................................ 8 1.2.3 Households .................................................................................................................................... 9 1.3 Economic situation and trends ................................................................................................... 12 1.3.1 General description of the economic situation of Trnava Region ......................... 12 1.3.2 Detailed description of
    [Show full text]
  • Increasing Competitiveness of the Slovak Republic. Sharing Reforms & EU Accession Experience. Vladim
    Country in transition: increasing competitiveness of the Slovak Republic. Sharing reforms & EU accession experience. Vladimír Benč1& René Matlovič2 Content Foreword ................................................................................................................................................ 2 Slovakia – today ......................................................................................................................................... 4 Reforming the country in between 1989 – 1999 ........................................................................................ 7 Success story of the EU accession from 1999 till 2007 ............................................................................. 9 Key measures ....................................................................................................................................... 10 EU accession process & reforms.......................................................................................................... 15 Tax reform ........................................................................................................................................... 18 Competition policy and the State Aid system (incl. EU accession negotiation) .................................. 23 Facing the impacts of the World economic crisis (2008 – onwards) ....................................................... 28 Regional disparities – potential source of development problems in Slovakia .................................... 32 Conclusion – lessons
    [Show full text]
  • Socio-Economic Transformation in Coal Transition Regions: Analysis and Proposed Approach Pilot Case in Upper Nitra, Slovakia
    Socio-economic transformation in coal transition regions: analysis and proposed approach Pilot case in Upper Nitra, Slovakia E. Donnari, S. Salanska, M. Matusiak, K.Rosina, C. Perpiña Castillo, R. Ribeiro Barranco, C. Jacobs-Crisioni, B. Kavalov, C. Lavalle, I. Maghiros, I. Seigneur, M. Boden, D. Pontikakis, H. Gerbelová, A. Spisto, S. Giaccaria, A. Purvins, L. Sereno, A.Bocin Dumitriu U. von Estorff, M. Masera 2018 This publication is a Science for Policy report by the Joint Research Centre (JRC), the European Commission’s science and knowledge service. It aims to provide evidence-based scientific support to the European policymaking process. The scientific output expressed does not imply a policy position of the European Commission. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use that might be made of this publication. Contact information Name: Elena Donnari Address: European Commission, Joint Research Centre, 21 Rue Champs du Mars, 1049 Brussels, Belgium Email: [email protected] Tel.: +32-2-298 68 74 JRC Science Hub https://ec.europa.eu/jrc JRCxxxxx EUR xxxxx xx PDF ISBN xxx-xx-xx-xxxxx-x ISSN xxxx-xxxx doi:xx.xxxxx/xxxxxx Print ISBN xxx-xx-xx-xxxxx-x ISSN xxxx-xxxx doi:xx.xxxxx/xxxxxx Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2018 © European Union, 2018 Reuse is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. The reuse policy of European Commission documents is regulated by Decision 2011/833/EU (OJ L 330, 14.12.2011, p. 39). For any use or reproduction of photos or other material that is not under the EU copyright, permission must be sought directly from the copyright holders.
    [Show full text]
  • Development Process of Energy Mix Towards Neutral Carbon Future of the Slovak Republic: a Review
    processes Review Development Process of Energy Mix towards Neutral Carbon Future of the Slovak Republic: A Review Martin Beer * and Radim Rybár Faculty of Mining, Ecology, Process Technologies and Geotechnology, Institute of Earth Sources, Technical University of Košice, Letná 9, 042 00 Košice, Slovakia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +421-055-602-2398 Abstract: Global climate change is putting humanity under pressure, which in many areas poses an unprecedented threat to society as we know it. In an effort to mitigate its effects, it is necessary to reduce the overall production of greenhouse gases and thus, dependence on fossil fuels in all areas of human activities. The presented paper deals with an evaluation of energy mix of the Slovak Republic and four selected neighboring countries in the context of achieving their carbon neutral or carbon negative future. The development of the evaluated energy mixes as well as greenhouse gas emissions is presented from a long-term perspective, which makes it possible to evaluate and compare mutual trends and approaches to emission-free energy sectors. Keywords: renewable energy; carbon neutral; energy mix; Slovak Republic Citation: Beer, M.; Rybár, R. 1. Introduction Development Process of Energy Mix The defining feature of recent decades is turbulence. Whether it is geopolitical, eco- towards Neutral Carbon Future of the nomic, or environmental instability, it is possible, to a certain extent, to connect this high Slovak Republic: A Review. Processes variability, respective uncertainty with global climate change [1–4]. Global climate change 2021, 9, 1263. https://doi.org/ is a phenomenon that came to the forefront of interest in the 1960s and is becoming in- 10.3390/pr9081263 creasingly important [5,6].
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Efficiency Gains and Green Growth Perspectives in Slovakia
    Study Resource Efficiency Gains and Green Growth Perspectives in Slovakia ZITA IzAKOVIčOVÁ, JÚLIUS OszLÁNYI, ŠTEFAN LUBY AND MARTINA LUBYOVÁ September 2012 n As Slovakia owns only limited primary energy resources (mainly brown coal), it strongly depends on imports of foreign raw materials (e.g. crude oil). Despite some success in reducing greenhouse gas emissions, long-term reduction targets seem difficult to reach. Energy consumption ranks still high among the EU27 average. Air pollution, chemical and physical degradation of soil assets, water pollution and dam- ages to vegetation are considered the main environmental problems. n Influenced by EU and other international organisations, there is a comprehensive legislative body concerning climate change and energy issues. However, many meas- ures laid out are still not realised and there is no national strategy for greening economic growth. Besides low public awareness, Slovakia faces a number of other obstacles to implement further sustainable legislation: growing social inequalities and governmental passivity. n The main potential for green growth lies in agriculture and in the renewable energy sector. The potential for the large-scale creation of green jobs seems low, as the share of sectors with high potential (especially agriculture) in total employment has been continuously declining. The main obstacles to green growth include: lack of political interest, unclear competences, lack of financial resources, poor innovation and research capacity, inadequate environmental education, insufficient support system for implementation of measures and increasing regional disparities. ZITA IzAKOVIčOVÁ, JÚLIUS OszLÁNYI, ŠTEFAN LUBY AND MARTINA LUBYOVÁ | RESOURCE EFFICIENCY GAINS AND GREEN GROWTH PERspECTIVES IN SLOVAKIA Content Introduction . 2 1 . Current Situation in Slovakia .
    [Show full text]
  • National Strategy for Sustainable Development for the Slovak
    NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT FOR THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC 2001 The National Strategy for Sustainable Development for the Slovak Republic has been prepared in the framework of the Project “Capacity Building for Sustainable Development”.. Project was implemented by the Regional Environmental Center for Central and Eastern Europe - REC Slovakia, financed by the United Nations Development Program and guaranted by the Minsitry of the Environment of the Slovak Republic. 2 CONTENT 1. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, ITS PRINCIPLES, CRITERIA AND INDICATORS..9 2. ENFORCEMENT OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN THE WORLD – A CHALLENGE FOR SLOVAKIA.......................................................................................................13 2.1 ENFORCEMENT OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE UNITED NATIONS ..........................................................................................................................................13 2.1.1 The UN Conference on Environment and Development (Rio de Janiero, 1992)..............13 2.1.2 The UN Commission on Sustainable Development...........................................................13 2.1.3 World Summit on Sustainable Development (Johannesburg, 2002).................................13 2.1.4 UN programmes and UN agencies ...................................................................................14 2.2 ENFORCEMENT OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT ........................14 2.3 ENFORCEMENT OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
    [Show full text]
  • Geothermal Energy Use, Country Update for Slovakia
    European Geothermal Congress 2019 Den Haag, The Netherlands, 11-14 June 2019 Geothermal Energy Use, Country Update for Slovakia Branislav Fričovský1, Radovan Černák1, Daniel Marcin1, Veronika Blanárová2, Katarína Benková1, Ondrej Pelech3, Marián Fendek4 1 Dept. of Hydrogeology and Geothermal Energy, Dionýz Štúr State institute of Geology, Mlynská dolina 1, 817 04 Bratislava, Slovakia 2 Directorate of Geology and Natural Resources, Ministry of Environment of the Slovak Republic, Bukurešťská 4, 811 04 Bratislava, Slovakia 3 Dept. of Geology of older geological units, Dionýz Štúr State institute of Geology, Mlynská dolina 1, 817 04 Bratislava, Slovakia 4 Hydrofen s.r.o., Jasovská 7, 851 07 Bratislava, Slovakia [email protected] Keywords: geothermal energy, direct use, resources and reserves, legislation, Slovakia. 1. INTRODUCTION ABSTRACT Although plans, strategies and legislative actions were Slovakia is a part of the Western Carpathians realm, an adopted, the Slovak Republic is still the fossil-fuels orogeny controlling geothermic activity of the territory oriented economy with roughly 19 % share of RES on through geological development, geodynamics and a primary energy mix. A proportion of geothermal deep geological structure. Because of any recent energy on heat production reaches app. 2 % only. volcanic activities, the entire territory of the country is of a moderate geothermic activity, with mean A systematic research and utilization of geothermal geothermal gradient of app. 30 °C.km-1 and 82.1 resources has been launched in 70’s, responding to mW.m-2. Low to moderate enthalpy (up to 150 °C) global concerns in fuels economics. However, a single-phase, geothermal waters have been successfully tradition in use of geothermal energy dates far beyond sampled of low, to moderate-low thermodynamic Medievals, owing to dozens thermal springs.
    [Show full text]
  • Bachelor Thesis Environmental Analysis of the Slovak Photovoltaic Market with Identification and Evaluation of Adoptable Business Models for Start-Ups
    BSc. Energy Systems Engineering 2020 Bachelor Thesis Environmental analysis of the Slovak photovoltaic market with identification and evaluation of adoptable business models for start-ups Samuel Zálešák Bachelor’s thesis at the Lucerne School of Engineering and Architecture Title Environmental Analysis of the Slovak Photovoltaic Market with Identification and Evaluation of Adoptable Business Models for Start-ups Student Zálešák, Samuel Bachelor’s degree program Bachelor in Energy Systems Engineering Semester spring semester 20 Lecturer Schneider, Achim External examiner Bongard, André Abstract German Diese These wurde zusammen mit einem Industriepartner, Zenergy, einem slowakischen Start-up- Unternehmen, das in den slowakischen Photovoltaikmarkt einsteigen möchte, durchgeführt. Ziel dieser Arbeit ist es, auf der Grundlage der aktuellen Markttrends anpassungsfähige Photovoltaik-Geschäftsmodelle für Start-ups, die in diesen Markt einsteigen möchten, zu identifizieren und zu bewerten. Der slowakische Energiemarkt wird im Hinblick auf politische, ökologische, soziale, technologische, wirtschaftliche und rechtliche Faktoren analysiert. Es wurden Interviews mit Experten aus der Photovoltaikindustrie des slowakischen Energiemarktes geführt. Zu den identifizierten Geschäftsmodellen gehören die Installation, der Betrieb und das Pay-per-Use-Modell der Photovoltaik, flexible Versorgungssysteme mit Batteriespeichersystemen, Netzausgleichsdienste unter Verwendung einer Batteriespeichersystem-Infrastruktur, der Betrieb einer Energiehandelsplattform
    [Show full text]
  • Slovakia Empowered Lives
    RENEWABLE ENERGY SNAPSHOT: Slovakia Empowered lives. Resilient nations. General Country Electricity Generating Information Capacity 2012 Population: 5,410,267 Surface Area: 49,036 km² 8,445 MW 9.8% Capital City: Bratislava Total Installed Capacity RE Share GDP (2012): $ 91.6 billion GDP Per Capita (2012): $ 16,932 827 MW Installed RE Capacity WB Ease of Doing Business: 49 Biomass Solar PV Wind Small Hydro Installed Renewable Electricity 1 Capacity 2012 in MW 208.4 517 3 99 Technical Potential for Installed 4,600 45,900 2,100 400 Renewable Electricity Capacity in MW Sources : ESHA (2011); World Bank (2014); EurObserv’Er (2013); WWEA (2013); EBRD (2009); INFORSE (2010); EC (2013); Renewable Facts (2013); EIA (2013; Hoogwijk and Graus (2008); Hoogwijk (2004); JRC (2011); and UNDP calculations. Key information about renewable energy in Slovakia In Slovakia, the share of renewable energy at installed electricity capacity amounts to almost 10 percent of its total installed power capacity. That share has increased significantly in recent years. In 2011, for example, 312 MW of photovoltaic power capacity was installed (Ren21, 2013). Like the neighbouring Czech Republic, this unexpected boom led to legislation being adapted by reducing solar installations’ tariff eligibility to 30 KW (Dojčanová, 2011). The main promotion policy instrument for renewable energy is a feed-in tariff. Electricity produced from wind, solar, geothermal, biogas, hydro and biomass is eligible for the tariff. The tariff is structured in two parts: the elec - 1 The value
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Structure of Foreign Direct Investment in Slovakia
    digitales archiv ZBW – Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft ZBW – Leibniz Information Centre for Economics Dudáš, Tomáš Article Regional structure of foreign direct investment in Slovakia Provided in Cooperation with: Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/11159/4235 Kontakt/Contact ZBW – Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft/Leibniz Information Centre for Economics Düsternbrooker Weg 120 24105 Kiel (Germany) E-Mail: [email protected] https://www.zbw.eu/econis-archiv/ Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieses Dokument darf zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken This document may be saved and copied for your personal und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. Sie and scholarly purposes. You are not to copy it for public or dürfen dieses Dokument nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle commercial purposes, to exhibit the document in public, to Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, aufführen, vertreiben perform, distribute or otherwise use the document in public. If oder anderweitig nutzen. Sofern für das Dokument eine Open- the document is made available under a Creative Commons Content-Lizenz verwendet wurde, so gelten abweichend von diesen Licence you may exercise further usage rights as specified in Nutzungsbedingungen die in der Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. the licence. Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft zbw Leibniz Information Centre for Economics Ekonomický časopis, 67 , 2019, č. 8, s. 811 – 836 811 Regional Structure of Foreign Direct Investment in Slovakia – a District-level Gravity-type Model 2009 – 2016 Tomáš DUDÁŠ * – Martin GRAN ČAY ** Abstract The paper develops a district-level gravity-type model of foreign direct invest- ment (FDI) stock in Slovakia using Poisson Pseudo Maximum Likelihood estima- tion based on the most recent investment data compiled by the National Bank of Slovakia (NBS).
    [Show full text]
  • Energy of the Future? Nuclear Energy in Central and Eastern Europe
    Energy of the Future? Nuclear energy in Central and Eastern Europe Editors: Karel Polanecký, Jan Haverkamp HEINRICH-BÖLL-STIFTUNG Energy of the Future? Nuclear energy in Central and Eastern Europe Nuclear energy in Central and Eastern in Central Europe energy Nuclear Energy of the Future? Energy Editors: Karel Polanecký, Jan Haverkamp Concept and Project Coordination: Eva van de Rakt, Erik Siegl English translation: Petra and Evan Mellander Photographs: Jan Haverkamp and Eastern in Central Europe energy Nuclear Typesetting: Tomáš Barčík Printing: H.R.G. spol. s r.o., Svitavská 120 , 570 01 Litomyšl Published by Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung Praha in February 2011 ISBN 978-80-254-8928-4 Energy of the Future? Energy 4 CONTENTS Preface 6 Summary 7 Part I: Political Support for Nuclear Energy 9 • Czech Republic – ČEZ, Nuclear Power and Political Elites (Karel Polanecký) 9 • Slovakia – Political Pressure to Develop Nuclear Energy (Pavol Široký) 14 • Poland – Nuclear Plans (Zbigniew M. Karaczun) 20 • Hungary – Traces of the Soviet Nuclear Industry (András Perger) 24 • Bulgaria – Energy Policy and Politics (Petko Kovachev, Jan Haverkamp) 28 Part II: Financing the Construction of Nuclear Reactors and Forms of State Support 37 Part III: Basic Data on the Significance of Nuclear Energy in Five States in the Region 47 About the Authors 54 Nuclear energy in Central and Eastern in Central Europe energy Nuclear Energy of the Future? Energy 5 PREFACE Looking at International Atomic Energy Agency statistics, it is not immediately evident that the coun- tries of Central and Eastern Europe would constitute a promised land for nuclear energy. In the Euro- pean states of the former Eastern Bloc only two reactors are actually being built – in Mochovce, Slo- vakia.
    [Show full text]