Revisional Notes on Selected East Palaearctic Species of Agabus

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Revisional Notes on Selected East Palaearctic Species of Agabus Revisional notes on selectedselected EastEast PalaearcticPalaearctic species of AgabusAgabus Leach (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae)Dytiscidae) ANDERS N. NILSSONNILSSON Nilsson, A.N.: RevisionalRevisional notesnotes onon selectedselected East PalaearcticPalaearctic speciesspecies of AgobusAgabus Leach (Coleo- ptera, Dytiscidae).Dytiscidae). [Taxonomiska[Thxonomiska anmiirkningaranmärkningar om östpalearktiskaostpalearktiska arter av Agabus Leach (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae).] -— Ent. Tidskr.Tidskr. I lll:149-161.1 1:149-161. Umeå,UmeA, SwedenSweden 1990.1990. ISSNISSN 0013-886x.001 3-886x. Out fromfrom thethe studystudy ofof somesome EastEast PalaearcticPalaearctic speciesspecies of the genus ,4gabusAgabus Leach notes are pre- sented on classificationclassification and nomenclature.nomenclatwe. Agabus inexspectatusinexspectalus sp. n.n. isis describeddescribed from a single male from Siberia. The following syn. n. are presented: Agabus zaitzewi Poppius, 1909,1909, Agabus hudsonicushudsonlcus Leech, 1938, and Agabus mongolicusmongolicas Guorguiev,Gu6orguiev, 19681968 = Agabus pallens Poppius, 1905;1905; Eriglenus charini Lafer, 19881988: = Ilybius mandsuricus Guignot, 1956;1956; AgobusAgabus insignislnsignis Gu&nsuiev,Gu6orguiev, 1969 1969: = Dytiscus arcticusarcticus Paykull, 1798;1198; AgobusAgabus kurilensiskurilensis Kamiya, 19381938= = Agabus tristis/rrslrs Aub&Aub6, 1838;1838; Mesogabus GtAorguiev,Gu6orguiev, 19691969= = GaurodytesGaurodyles Thomson, 1859.1859. Lectotypes are designated for thethe followingfollowing species:species: AgobusAgabus bergibergiZaitzev, Zaitzev, 1913,1913, Agabus tibetanustibetonus Zaitzev, 1908,1908, Agabus zimmermannizimmermonni Scholtz, 1920,1920, Colymbetes costulatus Mot-Mol- schulsky, 1859.1859. Agabus bergibergl isis given specificspecific rank.rank. Identification keyskeys are given for the world speciesspecies of the ,4A. labiatuslabiatus (Brahm)(Brahm) group, andand forfor thethe malesmales of thethe PalaearcticPalaearctic speciesspecies of the .4.A. confinisconfi n is (Gyllenhal)(Gyllenhal) group. A.N. Nilsson,Nitsson, DepartmentDepartment ofof AnimalAnimal Ecology,Ecology, UniversityUniversity of Umeå,Umed, S-901 8787 Umeå,Umed, Sweden. Introduction The dytiscidd1'tiscid genusgems Agabus Leach, 1817,1817, includes is monophyletic. InIn current usageusage thisthis is most pro- almost 200 species, of which thethe majority are con- bably not thethe case,case, andand no no single single synapomorphysynapomorphy fined to thethe Holarctic Holarctic Region. Region. SharpSharp (1882)(1882) re-re- have been given for the largelarge setset ofof speciesspecies so clas- cognized 23 species-groupsspecies-groups in Agabus,Agobus, with some sified. groups "clearly artificial". LaterLater attemptsattempts ofof clas-clas- In thethe absenceabsence of thethe analysesanalyses asked for aboveabove sification have created a longlong listlist ofof subgeneric subgeneric a valuablevaluable task is to definedefine naturalnatural groupsgroups withinwithin names (Larson(Larson 1989:865).1989:865). However, the currentcurrent Agabus. A first stepstep inin thisthis directiondirection waswas recentlyrecently use of subgenerasubgenera shows a pronounced variation, taken byby NilssonNilsson && LarsonLarson (1990)(1990) in a revisionrevision of both personallypersonally and geographically. AfterAfter Sharp's thethe A. affinisaffinis (Paykull)(Paykull) group. AA classificationclassification of (1882)(1882) monography,monography, nono workwork has dealt with the the NearcticNearctic speciesspecies waswas recentlyrecently presentedpresented byby classification of Agabus out fromfrom thethe worldworld fau-fau- Larsson (1989),(1989), whose species-groupsspecies-groups names are na. However,However, ZimmermannZimmermann (1919)(1919) studied a large adopted here.here. TheThe delimitationdelimitation ofof groupsgroups callscalls for part ofof itit andand classifiedclassified the current subgenussubgenus Gau-Gaa- better knowledgeknowledge of many species,species, as many valu- rodytes Thomson, 1859,1859, into three groupsgroups fromfrom able characters were not givengiven withwith thethe originaloriginal structure ofof malemale genitalia.genitalia. descriptions or in handbooks. The prevailing regional perspective has probab- In thethe presentpresent paper,paper, somesome Agabus groups are ly hamperedhampered development,development, and anotheranother basicbasic discussed outout from the studystudy of EastEast PalaearcticPalaearctic problem is the position of AgobusAgabus as the dumping specimens and species.species. Some newnew synonymssynonyms are ground of Agabini.Agabini. ItIt seemsseems logicallogical that a genusgenus established and aa newnew speciesspecies is described from Si-Si- defined only on its wanting of the apomorphies of beria. MostMost of thethe materialmaterial forfor thisthis investigation investigation the other generagenera ofof thethe tribetribe shouldshould bebe impossibleimpossible was examined oror borrowed during a visit to the to classify. The first step towardstowards a natural classifi-classifi- Zoological Institute of LeningradLeningrad inin AprilApril 1988.1988. cationcalion of AgoDasAgabus must be to ensure that the genus The followingfollowing abbreviations are used:used: (MZH)(MZH) 150150 Anders N. NilssonNi/sson University Zoological Museum, Helsinki, (ZIL)(ZIL) at leastleast on outerouter halfhalf ofof disc.disc. Metafemur Metafemur withwith produced. Zoological Institute, Leningrad; (TL) totaltoral length, posteroapical angle strongly produced. Elytron with punctures at intersections of meshesmeshes and in (MW)(MW) maximum width, (WC/WS) ratioratio betweenbetween longitudinallongitudinal series ofof about samesame size.size. MaleMale width of metacoxa and width of metasternum (cf. profemur without ventral brush of setaesetae ......... Nilsson 1984).1984). When possible, measurements are fulvaster 5. Metasternum with anteromedian impression given as mean -+± SD. 5 il;i;;i;;;;; ;l;il' ;;;;;;;;';;';;;;;*'#f"" long, attainingattaining levellevel of hind marginmargin of meso-meso- coxa. ProsternalProsternal processprocess narrower; ratio be-be- tween maximum andand minimum width 2.1-2.3.2.1-2.3 The Agabus labiatuslabiatus group tween Dorsal surface normally brown to piceous ....... お This group corresponds to the subgenussubgenus Eriglenus ¨…………………………・………… labiatus″b″ ′ — Metasternum with anteromediananteromedian impressionimpression Thomson, 1859.1859. It isis recognizedrecognized on thethe apicallyapically short, notnot attainingattaining levellevel of hindhind marginmargin of me- lobed parameresparameres and thethe narrow narrow metasternal metasternal socoxa.socoxa, Prosternal process broader; ratio be-be- wings, and includesincludes thethe sixsix species:species: A. fulvasterfulvaster tween maximum andand minimum width 2.4-2.9.2.4-2.9. Zaitzev, 1906,1906, A. labiatus labiatus (Brahm, 1790), 1790), A. Dorsal surface pale yellowish to reddish brown :::::i :::1i:: ::': rll::::l :: ll1llil litlt,,,,, pallens mandsuricus (Guignot, 1956),1956), A. pallens Poppius, 1905,1905, A. undulatusundulatus (Schrank, 1776),1776), andand A. zim-z,im- Agabus pallens Poppius mermanni Scholtz, 1920.1920. The species of the labia-labia- tus-group,r.s-group cancan bebe separatedseparated withwith thethe followingfollowing key.key. Agabus femoralrbfemoralis Payk. var.var. pallens Poppius, 1905:221905:22 Leech (1942) includedincluded alsoalso the Holarctic A. bi-bi- Agabus zaitzewi Poppius, 1909:12,1909 12, syn. n. Agabus hudsonicus Leech, 1938:123,1938:123, syn. n. farius (Kirby)(Kirby) in this group. However, as the para- farius Agabus mongolicus, Gui.orguiev,Gueorguiev, 1968:27,196827, syn. n. meres of thisthis speciesspecies are markedly different and the narrownarrow metasternal metasternal wings wings obviously obviously havehave TypeIlpe material. Holotype cta of pallens in MZH (Biström(Bistr6m evolved independently in severalseveral Agabus lineages, 1987),1987), labelled:labelled: "Olekminsk","Olekminsk", "Fl."Fl. Lena S.", "B. Pop- pius", "Mus. Zool.Zool. H:forsH:fors Spec. Spec. typ.typ. No No 1648 1648 AgabusAgabus Leech's classification is not followed here. Larson (Eriglenus)(Eriglenus) femoralisfemoralis Payk.Payk. v. pallenspallens Popp.",Popp.", and mymy (1989) (1989) placed A. bifariusbifarius in itsirs own group. holotype label. — LectotypeLectotype cra and paralectotypes 2Q29 of zaitzewizoitzewiinMZH in MZH- (Biström(Bistrom 1987)1987) labelled:labelled: "Kanin","Kanin", "B. Poppius", and mymy typetype labels;labels; lectotype lectotype alsoalso labelledlabelled Key to speciesspecies "zaitzewi"zaitzewi typ.typ. m.,m., A. salinatorsalinator typ. m.", and "Mus."Mus. Zool. H:forsH:fors Spec.Spec. typ.typ. NoNo 18511851 Agabus (Gaurod.) zait- 1.l. Elytron dark brownbrown toto blackblack withwith yellowyellow fasciafascia zewi Popp."Popp." Typesppes ofof hudsonicus andand mongolicus notnot or vitta,vitta, andand meshesmeshes ofof microreticulationmicroreticulation smallsmall seen in California Acad. Sci., SanSan Francisco,Francisco, and Mu- and roundedrounded ........................ 22 seum of Nat.Nat. Hist.,Hist., Budapest, Budapest, respectively. respectively. - Elytron of moremore oror lessless uniform uniform yellowyellow toto brown colour, and meshesmeshes of microreticulationmicroreticulation TypeIlpe localities: of pallens "Olekminsk""Olekminsk" (USSR,(USSR, Yakuti-Yakuti- of more irregular sizesize and shape 33 ................... an ASSR);ASSR); of zaitzewi "Tschosha", KaninKanin PeninsulaPeninsula
Recommended publications
  • (Iaps) and Other Small Waterbodies in Northern Ireland Quercus Project QU09-03
    Natural Heritage Research Partnership Important Areas for Ponds (IAPs) and other small waterbodies in Northern Ireland Quercus Project QU09-03 Bog pool at Montiaghs Moss Nature Reserve and ASSI Prepared for the Northern Ireland Environment Agency (NIEA) by Helen Keeble, Penny Williams, Jeremy Biggs, Pond Conservation & Neil Reid, Natural Heritage Research Partnership, Quercus This report should be cited as: Keeble, H. Williams, P. Biggs, J. & Reid, N. (2009) Important Areas for Ponds (IAPs) and other small waterbodies in Northern Ireland. Report prepared by Pond Conservation and the Natural Heritage Research Partnership, Quercus for the Northern Ireland Environment Agency, Northern Ireland, UK. Pond Conservation c/o Oxford Brookes University Gipsy Lane, Headington Oxford, OX3 0BP www.pondconservation.org.uk Quercus project QU09-03 Quercus hosts the Natural Heritage Research Partnership between the Northern Ireland Environment Agency and Queen's University Belfast. http://www.quercus.ac.uk/ www.quercus.ac.uk Acknowledgements We would like to thank all those who provided data, photos or other information for this assessment, and especially those who took time to visit sites with us in June 2009. In particular: Bob Davidson, Brian Nelson, Catherine McSorley, Jane Preston, John Early, Lynne Rendle, Marcus Malley, Mary Gallagher, Patrick Kelly, Richard Weyl, Seamus Burns and Tony Waterman. Report production: July 2009 Consultation: August 2009 SUMMARY Ponds are an important freshwater habitat that has been shown to play a key role in maintaining biodiversity at landscape level. However, ponds are also vulnerable to environmental degradation and there is evidence that, at a national level, pond quality is declining. In 2007, the biodiversity importance of ponds was recognised when high quality ponds (Priority Ponds) were added to the list of UK Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP) Priority Habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Green-Tree Retention and Controlled Burning in Restoration and Conservation of Beetle Diversity in Boreal Forests
    Dissertationes Forestales 21 Green-tree retention and controlled burning in restoration and conservation of beetle diversity in boreal forests Esko Hyvärinen Faculty of Forestry University of Joensuu Academic dissertation To be presented, with the permission of the Faculty of Forestry of the University of Joensuu, for public criticism in auditorium C2 of the University of Joensuu, Yliopistonkatu 4, Joensuu, on 9th June 2006, at 12 o’clock noon. 2 Title: Green-tree retention and controlled burning in restoration and conservation of beetle diversity in boreal forests Author: Esko Hyvärinen Dissertationes Forestales 21 Supervisors: Prof. Jari Kouki, Faculty of Forestry, University of Joensuu, Finland Docent Petri Martikainen, Faculty of Forestry, University of Joensuu, Finland Pre-examiners: Docent Jyrki Muona, Finnish Museum of Natural History, Zoological Museum, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland Docent Tomas Roslin, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Division of Population Biology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland Opponent: Prof. Bengt Gunnar Jonsson, Department of Natural Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden ISSN 1795-7389 ISBN-13: 978-951-651-130-9 (PDF) ISBN-10: 951-651-130-9 (PDF) Paper copy printed: Joensuun yliopistopaino, 2006 Publishers: The Finnish Society of Forest Science Finnish Forest Research Institute Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry of the University of Helsinki Faculty of Forestry of the University of Joensuu Editorial Office: The Finnish Society of Forest Science Unioninkatu 40A, 00170 Helsinki, Finland http://www.metla.fi/dissertationes 3 Hyvärinen, Esko 2006. Green-tree retention and controlled burning in restoration and conservation of beetle diversity in boreal forests. University of Joensuu, Faculty of Forestry. ABSTRACT The main aim of this thesis was to demonstrate the effects of green-tree retention and controlled burning on beetles (Coleoptera) in order to provide information applicable to the restoration and conservation of beetle species diversity in boreal forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Beetles
    Ireland Red List No. 1 Water beetles Ireland Red List No. 1: Water beetles G.N. Foster1, B.H. Nelson2 & Á. O Connor3 1 3 Eglinton Terrace, Ayr KA7 1JJ 2 Department of Natural Sciences, National Museums Northern Ireland 3 National Parks & Wildlife Service, Department of Environment, Heritage & Local Government Citation: Foster, G. N., Nelson, B. H. & O Connor, Á. (2009) Ireland Red List No. 1 – Water beetles. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland. Cover images from top: Dryops similaris (© Roy Anderson); Gyrinus urinator, Hygrotus decoratus, Berosus signaticollis & Platambus maculatus (all © Jonty Denton) Ireland Red List Series Editors: N. Kingston & F. Marnell © National Parks and Wildlife Service 2009 ISSN 2009‐2016 Red list of Irish Water beetles 2009 ____________________________ CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................................................... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...................................................................................................................................... 2 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................................ 3 NOMENCLATURE AND THE IRISH CHECKLIST................................................................................................ 3 COVERAGE .......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • By Agabus Bipustulatus (Insecta, Coleoptera, Dytiscidae)
    Predation on Italian newt larva, Lissotriton italicus (Amphibia, Caudata, Salamandridae), by Agabus bipustulatus (Insecta, Coleoptera, Dytiscidae) LUIGI CORSETTI1 and GIANLUCA NARDI2 1 Via Adige, 45. I-04100 Latina, Italy. 2 Centro Nazionale per lo Studio e la Conservazione della Biodiversità Forestale - Corpo Forestale dello Stato. Strada Mantova, 29. I-46045 Marmirolo (MN), Italy. 2 Author for correspondence: [email protected] ABSTRACT — Predation of a larva of Lissotriton italicus by adults of a diving beetle (Agabus bipustulatus) on the Aurunci Mountains (central Italy, Latium region) is recorded. This is the first identified invertebrate predator of this Italian endemic newt. The possible role of this beetle in the local demographic control of the newt is briefly discussed. HE Italian Newt, Lissotriton italicus (Peracca), (Latina province, Castelforte, Monte Siola W-SW Tpreviously referred to the genus Triturus slope, 240 m a.s.l). No other amphibians occurred (Rafinesque), is endemic to central and southern in the pond, which was probably feebly trickle fed Italy. The northern most limits of its distribution by a very small spring. In this pond about 15 adults include an oblique area extended from the Ancona of a predaceous diving beetle, Agabus bipustulatus province (Marches region) South to Lepini (Linnaeus) (Insecta, Coleoptera, Dytiscidae) were Mountains (Latium region, Rome province), on observed attacking a larva of the Italian Newt. The the Adriatic and Tyrrhenian sides of the Apennines, larva was initially attacked by a single beetle that respectively (Corsetti et al., 2005; Balletto, 2006; was quickly followed by the others and was Scillitani et al., 2006; Scillitani & Tripepi, 2007). devoured, almost completely, in about 10-15 It is a euryoecious species living in a wide range seconds.
    [Show full text]
  • Dytiscid Water Beetles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) of the Yukon
    Dytiscid water beetles of the Yukon FRONTISPIECE. Neoscutopterus horni (Crotch), a large, black species of dytiscid beetle that is common in sphagnum bog pools throughout the Yukon Territory. 491 Dytiscid Water Beetles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) of the Yukon DAVID J. LARSON Department of Biology, Memorial University of Newfoundland St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada A1B 3X9 Abstract. One hundred and thirteen species of Dytiscidae (Coleoptera) are recorded from the Yukon Territory. The Yukon distribution, total geographical range and habitat of each of these species is described and multi-species patterns are summarized in tabular form. Several different range patterns are recognized with most species being Holarctic or transcontinental Nearctic boreal (73%) in lentic habitats. Other major range patterns are Arctic (20 species) and Cordilleran (12 species), while a few species are considered to have Grassland (7), Deciduous forest (2) or Southern (5) distributions. Sixteen species have a Beringian and glaciated western Nearctic distribution, i.e. the only Nearctic Wisconsinan refugial area encompassed by their present range is the Alaskan/Central Yukon refugium; 5 of these species are closely confined to this area while 11 have wide ranges that extend in the arctic and/or boreal zones east to Hudson Bay. Résumé. Les dytiques (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) du Yukon. Cent treize espèces de dytiques (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) sont connues au Yukon. Leur répartition au Yukon, leur répartition globale et leur habitat sont décrits et un tableau résume les regroupements d’espèces. La répartition permet de reconnaître plusieurs éléments: la majorité des espèces sont holarctiques ou transcontinentales-néarctiques-boréales (73%) dans des habitats lénitiques. Vingt espèces sont arctiques, 12 sont cordillériennes, alors qu’un petit nombre sont de la prairie herbeuse (7), ou de la forêt décidue (2), ou sont australes (5).
    [Show full text]
  • Bedfordshire and Luton County Wildlife Sites
    Bedfordshire and Luton County Wildlife Sites Selection Guidelines VERSION 14 December 2020 BEDFORDSHIRE AND LUTON LOCAL SITES PARTNERSHIP 1 Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................ 5 2. HISTORY OF THE CWS SYSTEM ......................................................................................................................... 7 3. CURRENT CWS SELECTION PROCESS ................................................................................................................ 8 4. Nature Conservation Review CRITERIA (modified version) ............................................................................. 10 5. GENERAL SUPPLEMENTARY FACTORS ......................................................................................................... 14 6 SITE SELECTION THRESHOLDS........................................................................................................................ 15 BOUNDARIES (all CWS) ............................................................................................................................................ 15 WOODLAND, TREES and HEDGES ........................................................................................................................ 15 TRADITIONAL ORCHARDS AND FRUIT TREES ................................................................................................. 19 ARABLE FIELD MARGINS........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Critical Biological Resources of Pueblo County, Colorado
    Survey of Critical Biological Resources of Pueblo County, Colorado Colorado Natural Heritage Program Colorado State University 254 General Services Building 8002 Campus Delivery Fort Collins, Colorado 80523-8002 Survey of Critical Biological Resources of Pueblo County, Colorado Prepared for: Pueblo County Planning Department Pueblo, Colorado Prepared by: Susan Spackman Panjabi, Botanist John Sovell, Zoologist Georgia Doyle, Wetland Ecologist Denise Culver, Ecologist Lee Grunau, Conservation Planner May 2003 Colorado Natural Heritage Program Colorado State University 254 General Services Building 8002 Campus Delivery Fort Collins, Colorado 80523-8002 USER’S GUIDE The Survey of Critical Biological Resources of Pueblo County was conducted one year after the Survey of Critical Wetland and Riparian Areas in El Paso and Pueblo Counties. The projects, both conducted by the Colorado Natural Heritage Program, are two distinct projects that are highly integrated with respect to methodology and fieldwork. Both projects utilized the same Natural Heritage methodology that is used throughout the globe, and both searched for and assessed the plants, animals, and plant communities on the Colorado Natural Heritage Program’s list of rare and imperiled elements of biodiversity. Each report prioritizes potential conservation areas based on the relative significance of the biodiversity they support and the urgency for protection of the site. All information explaining Natural Heritage methodology and ranks is repeated in each report, so that each report can stand alone and be used independently of the other. This report, Survey of Critical Biological Resources of Pueblo County, presents all potential conservation areas identified in Pueblo County that support rare and imperiled plants, animals, and significant plant communities, including wetland and riparian areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Dytiscidae: Agabinae) with Phylogenetic Considerations
    Zootaxa 4646 (3): 401–433 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2019 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4646.3.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D9362795-F949-4A1F-9E46-1A466EDD9301 Description of the larvae of four Japanese Platambus Thomson, 1859 (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae: Agabinae) with phylogenetic considerations RYOHEI OKADA1, YVES ALARIE2 & MARIANO C. MICHAT3 1Coleopterological Society of Japan. National Museum of Nature and Science, Tsukuba, 3050005 Japan. E–mail: [email protected] 2Department of Biology, Laurentian University, Ramsey Lake Road, P3E 2C6, Canada. E-mail: [email protected] 3Laboratory of Entomology, IBBEA, CONICET-UBA., DBBE-FCEN, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The larvae of four species of Platambus Thomson, 1859 from Japan, P. pictipennis (Sharp, 1873), P. convexus Okada, 2011, P. fimbriatus (Sharp, 1884) and P. sawadai (Kamiya, 1932) are described for the first time including a detailed chaetotaxy analysis of the cephalic capsule, head appendages, legs, last abdominal segment and urogomphi. A provisional parsimony analysis based on 39 informative larval characteristics of 15 species in seven genera of the subfamily Agabinae was conducted using the program TNT. Larvae of the Platambus species studied stand out from those of other genera of Agabinae by the unique presence of a subquadrate last abdominal segment not protruding posteriorly into siphon and the much shorter length of the primary urogomphal seta UR5 compared to seta UR7 in first instar larva. Key words: Coleoptera, Dytiscidae, Agabinae, Platambus, chaetotaxy, larvae, Palearctic Introduction The dytiscid genus Platambus Thomson, 1859 contains 67 species distributed in the Nearctic, Neotropical, Orien- tal and Palearctic regions (Bian & Ji 2008; Hendrich & Przewoźny 2015; Hájek & Zhang 2019; Nilsson & Hájek 2019).
    [Show full text]
  • 319 Konference “15 Let Národního Parku Podyjí
    THAYENSIA (ZNOJMO) 2007, 7: 319–332. ISSN 1212-3560 KONFERENCE “15 LET NÁRODNÍHO PARKU PODYJÍ – VÝZKUM A OCHRANA”, ZNOJMO, 1.–3. LISTOPADU 2006: ABSTRAKTA PREZENTACÍ, KTERÉ NEJSOU ZAHRNUTY V TOMTO SBORNÍKU FORMOU ČLÁNKU CONFERENCE “15 YEARS OF THE PODYJÍ NATIONAL PARK – RESEARCH AND PROTECTION”, ZNOJMO, NOVEMBER 1–3, 2006: ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS NOT INCLUDED IN THIS ISSUE DIPTERA OF THE PODYJÍ NATIONAL PARK AND ITS ENVIRONS Miroslav B a r t á k Czech University of Agriculture, Department of Zoology and Fisheries, CZ–165 21 Praha 6, Czech Republic The area of the Podyjí NP and its close environs were thoroughly investigated in 2001–2004 in order to learn more information about the Diptera fauna. Altogether, 3,606 species were identi- fi ed. In the fi nal monograph resulting from our research (BARTÁK M., KUBÍK Š. (eds.) 2005: Diptera of Podyjí National Park and its Environs. – ČZU Praha, 432 pp.) we reported 137 records of new species in the Czech Republic and another 155 in Moravia. The most striking feature of the Podyjí NP’s Diptera fauna is the surprisingly frequent occurrence of species with clear affi nity to mounta- inous habitats. A relatively large number of the species collected in the Podyjí NP were obviously obtained due to the effi cient collecting methods used (Malaise traps, white and yellow pan water traps, emergence traps, sweeping, car nets, etc.). The Podyjí NP proved to be very important for nature conservation, altogether 252 species included in the recent regional Red list were found (= 26.1% of all Czech species included) and several species discovered for the fi rst time in the Czech Republic by the present investigations in this area were proposed in addition to this list.
    [Show full text]
  • Beaver Creates Early Successional Hotspots for Water Beetles
    Biodiversity and Conservation (2021) 30:2655–2670 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-021-02213-8 ORIGINAL PAPER Beaver creates early successional hotspots for water beetles Petri Nummi1 · Wenfei Liao2 · Juliette van der Schoor3,4 · John Loehr4 Received: 16 September 2020 / Revised: 16 May 2021 / Accepted: 24 May 2021 / Published online: 4 June 2021 © The Author(s) 2021 Abstract Beavers (Castor spp.) are ecosystem engineers that induce local disturbance and ecological succession, which turns terrestrial into aquatic ecosystems and creates habitat heteroge- neity in a landscape. Beavers have been proposed as a tool for biodiversity conservation and ecosystem restoration. So far, most research has compared biodiversity in beaver wet- lands and non-beaver wetlands, but few studies have explored how beaver-created succes- sion afects specifc taxa. In this study, we investigated how water beetles responded to diferent successional stages of wetlands in a beaver-disturbed landscape at Evo in southern Finland. We sampled water beetles with 1-L activity traps in 20 ponds, including: 5 new beaver ponds, 5 old beaver ponds, 5 former beaver ponds, and 5 never engineered ponds. We found that beaver wetlands had higher species richness and abundance than non-beaver wetlands, and that new beaver wetlands could support higher species richness (321%) and abundance (671%) of water beetles compared to old beaver wetlands. We think that higher water beetle diversity in new beaver ponds has resulted from habitat amelioration (avail- able lentic water, shallow shores, aquatic vegetation, and low fsh abundance) and food source enhancement (an increase of both dead and live prey) created by beaver dams and foods.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora, Fauna and Climate of Scotland During the Weichselian Middle Pleniglacial ^ Palynological, Macrofossil and Coleopteran Investigations
    Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 204 (2004) 65^100 www.elsevier.com/locate/palaeo Flora, fauna and climate of Scotland during the Weichselian Middle Pleniglacial ^ palynological, macrofossil and coleopteran investigations Johanna A.A. Bos a;Ã, J.H. Dickson b, G.R. Coope c, W.G. Jardine d a Geobiology-Botanical Palaeoecology, Laboratory of Palaeobotany and Palynology, Utrecht University, Budapestlaan 4, NL-3584 CD Utrecht, The Netherlands b Institute of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Division of Environmental and Evolutionary Biology, Graham Kerr Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Scotland, UK c Department of Earth Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK d Department of Earth Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Scotland, UK Received 9 April 2002; received in revised form 1 October 2003; accepted 4 November 2003 Abstract Thin lenses of organic-rich material, on the upper surface of a layer of glacio-fluvial deposits have been studied in an open cast coal-mine near Sourlie, western Scotland. Radiocarbon dates on antler fragments, plant debris and bulk organic matter from silt, showed that the sediments accumulated between ca. 33 500 and 29 000 14C yr BP, during a period when this part of western Scotland was free of glaciers. The organic-rich sediments yielded a very rich flora and fauna and in total about 160 plant taxa and 61 coleopteran taxa were recorded together with other invertebrates. The Sourlie flora is one of the richest late Middle Weichselian floras yet studied within the British Isles. Leg bones of Coelodonta antiquitatis (woolly rhinoceros) and Rangifer tarandus (reindeer) were also found at the site.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Geographical Scale of Sampling on DNA Barcoding
    Syst. Biol. 61(5):851–869, 2012 c The Author(s) 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Society of Systematic Biologists. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. DOI:10.1093/sysbio/sys037 Advance Access publication on March 7, 2012 The Effect of Geographical Scale of Sampling on DNA Barcoding 1,2,3 4 2,3 2,3 JOHANNES BERGSTEN ∗,DAVID T. BILTON ,TOMOCHIKA FUJISAWA ,MIRANDA ELLIOTT , MICHAEL T. MONAGHAN5,MICHAEL BALKE6,LARS HENDRICH6,JOJA GEIJER7,JAN HERRMANN7, GARTH N. FOSTER8,IGNACIO RIBERA9,ANDERS N. NILSSON10,TIMOTHY G. BARRACLOUGH3, AND ALFRIED P. VOGLER2,3 1Department of Entomology, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Box 50007, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden; 2Entomology Department, Natural History Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/sysbio/article-abstract/61/5/851/1736372 by guest on 20 November 2018 Museum, Cromwell road, London SW7 5BD, UK; 3Division of Biology, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot SL5 7PY, UK; 4Marine Biology and Ecology Research Centre, School of Marine Science and Engineering, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth, Devon PL4 8AA, UK; 5Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Mueggelseedamm 301, 12587 Berlin, Germany; 6Zoologische Staatssammlung M¨unchen, M¨unchhausenstrasse21, 81247 M¨unchen,Germany;
    [Show full text]