DOCSLIB.ORG

Joint Institute for VLBI in Europe Biennial Report 2011-2012

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Joint Institute for VLBI in Europe Biennial Report 2011-2012 Joint Institute For VLBI in Europe 11-12 Biennial report 2011-2012 The Joint Institute for VLBI in Europe (JIVE) was established as a scientific foundation in December 1993. JIVE’s mandate is to support the operations of the European VLBI Network (EVN) in the widest sense. JIVE’s operations are supported via multi‐national funds from the following organisations: Netherlands Institute for Radio Astronomy (ASTRON), the Netherlands, National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS), France National Geographical Institute (IGN), Spain, Italian National Institute of Astrophysics (INAF), Italy, Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy (MPIfR), Germany, National Astronomical Observatories of China (NAOC), China, National Research Foundation (NRF), South Africa Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO), the Netherlands, Onsala Space Observatory (OSO), Sweden, Science & Technology Facilities Council (STFC), UK Joint Institute for VLBI in Europe | Biennial report 2011‐2012 Contents 1. INSTITUTE ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. preparing for the next funding cycle ..................................................................................................... 1 1.2. enhancing the VLBI capabilities ............................................................................................................. 2 1.3. JIVE events ............................................................................................................................................. 4 2. SCIENCE OPERATIONS AND SUPPORT ............................................................................................................ 6 2.1. production correlation .......................................................................................................................... 6 2.1.1. sessions and their experiments .................................................................................................... 6 2.1.2. logistics and Infrastructure ........................................................................................................... 9 2.1.3. astronomical features ................................................................................................................. 10 2.2. EVN support ......................................................................................................................................... 11 2.2.1. new stations ................................................................................................................................ 12 2.3. PI support ............................................................................................................................................ 13 3. TECHNICAL OPERATIONS and R&D .............................................................................................................. 16 3.1. data processor maintenance ............................................................................................................... 16 3.2. data processor developments and upgrades ...................................................................................... 17 3.2.1. mark5 and jive5AB ...................................................................................................................... 17 3.2.2. archive ........................................................................................................................................ 17 3.2.3. PCint ............................................................................................................................................ 17 3.3. SFXC software correlator ..................................................................................................................... 17 3.4. next‐generation FPGA‐based EVN correlator ...................................................................................... 19 3.4.1. the UniBoard ............................................................................................................................... 19 3.4.2. UniBoard2 .................................................................................................................................... 21 3.5. user software developments ............................................................................................................... 22 3.5.1. ParselTongue .............................................................................................................................. 22 3.5.2. ALBiUS ......................................................................................................................................... 22 3.6. e‐VLBI developments ........................................................................................................................... 22 3.7. NEXPReS .............................................................................................................................................. 23 3.7.1. cloud correlation ......................................................................................................................... 23 3.7.2. high bandwidth on demand ........................................................................................................ 24 3.7.3. computing in a shared infrastructure ......................................................................................... 25 3.7.4. flexbuff: high‐bandwidth, high‐capacity networked storage ..................................................... 25 3.8. e‐VLBI workshops ................................................................................................................................ 25 3.9. towards 4gbps e‐VLBI: a demo ............................................................................................................ 26 3.9.1. objectives .................................................................................................................................... 26 3.9.2. initial situation ............................................................................................................................ 27 3.9.3. practical solutions ....................................................................................................................... 27 3.9.4. results and conclusions ............................................................................................................... 28 4. SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH ................................................................................................................................... 30 4.1. high‐mass star‐formation .................................................................................................................... 30 4.2. evolved stars ........................................................................................................................................ 32 4.3. galactic pulsars, variable and transient radio sources ......................................................................... 33 4.4. active galactic nuclei and deep extragalactic surveys ......................................................................... 36 4.5. scintillation and propagation effects ................................................................................................... 39 5. SPACE SCIENCE ............................................................................................................................................. 41 5.1. VLBI and space science ........................................................................................................................ 41 5.2. VLBI tracking of planetary and space science missions ....................................................................... 41 5.3. space VLBI: radioastron ....................................................................................................................... 44 5.4. next generation space VLBI ................................................................................................................. 45 5.5. toward moon‐based Ultra‐Long‐Wavelength Interferometer ............................................................ 46 6. EXTERNALLY FUNDED PROJECTS .................................................................................................................. 47 6.1. RadioNetFP7 ........................................................................................................................................ 47 6.1.1. EVN TNA ...................................................................................................................................... 47 6.1.2. ALBiUS ......................................................................................................................................... 47 6.1.3. UniBoard ..................................................................................................................................... 47 6.2. RadioNet3 ............................................................................................................................................ 48 Joint Institute for VLBI in Europe | Biennial report 2011‐2012 6.2.1. EVN TNA ...................................................................................................................................... 48 6.2.2. QueSERA ..................................................................................................................................... 49 6.2.3. UniBoard2 ...................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dr. Alex Harrison Parker Postdoctoral Fellow in Planetary Astronomy
    Dr. Alex Harrison Parker Postdoctoral Fellow in Planetary Astronomy Department of Astronomy University of California at Berkeley Phone: 360-599-5346 B-20 Hearst Field Annex #3411 [email protected] Berkeley, CA 94720-3411 www.astro.uvic.ca/~alexhp/ Higher Education Institution Field Degree Years University of Victoria Astronomy PhD 2007|2011. University of Washington Physics & Astronomy BSc 2005|2007. Whatcom Community College Physics AAS 2002|2005. PhD Details \Ultra-Wide Trans-Neptunian Binaries: Tracers of the Outer Solar System's History" | Advised by Dr. JJ Kavelaars, National Research Council of Canada | Thesis archived online at http://hdl.handle.net/1828/3400 | Enrolled September 2007 | Defended July 2011 | Awarded November 2011 Professional Appointments University of California at Berkeley - Postdoctoral Fellow 2013 | Present. University of California at Berkeley Department of Astronomy Ongoing support for New Horizons post-Pluto/Kuiper Belt mission development. Kuiper Belt Binaries team lead for CFHT-OSSOS Large Program. See \Ongoing Research" document. New Horizons Outer Solar System Science Fellow 2011 | 2013. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge MA USA. Survey specialist; searching for candidate Kuiper Belt Objects for NASA's New Horizons spacecraft to visit after its 2015 Pluto encounter. Perform advanced survey image analysis, trajectory analysis, target orbit and physical characterization. Manage central astrometry database and target submission to the Minor Planet Center. Science case development for remote-sensing observations of Kuiper Belt Objects at medium range (0.1-0.5 AU). National Science Foundation | Graduate Research Fellow 2008 | 2011. University of Victoria, Victoria BC Canada. PhD research in binary Kuiper Belt Object orbits, dynamics, and origin.
    [Show full text]
  • SSSC Commissioning Notes
    SSSC Commissioning Notes In this document, the Vera C. Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) Solar System Science Collaboration (SSSC) has compiled a series of commissioning notes, proposing on-sky observing strategies during commissioning that would enhance opportunities for science validation and testing of the Rubin Observatory’s data management pipelines. The SSSC has ranked the commissioning notes below into priorities (high, medium, and low) based on the expected contribution to verifying the scientific capability of Rubin Observatory and informing Year 1 LSST operations. PROPOSED HIGH PRIORITY WIDE-FAST-DEEP OBSERVING COMMISSIONING TASKS Validation of Incremental Template Generation Proposed by: Meg Schwamb & Mario Jurić ​ Email Contact for Further Information: [email protected], ​ ​ [email protected] RA(s)/Decs(s): Agnostic to the specific pointing and cadence of observations ​ Filter(s) Required: grizy ​ Brief Description of Observing strategy: ​ Wide-Fast-Deep (WFD) cadence might be preferable to fully characterize the incremental template generation pipelines, but observing strategy is flexible. The main constraint is obtaining the appropriate number of images per filter that meet the criteria for template generation. Rationale: These proposed observations will test and validate the incremental template generation capability of the data management pipelines and confirm incremental templates can be successfully generated at the start of operations for Solar System objects to be detected 1 in
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Range Kuiper Belt Targets Observed by the Hubble Space Telescope ⇑ S.D
    Icarus 246 (2015) 369–374 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Icarus journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/icarus New Horizons: Long-range Kuiper Belt targets observed by the Hubble Space Telescope ⇑ S.D. Benecchi a,b, , K.S. Noll c, H.A. Weaver d, J.R. Spencer e, S.A. Stern e, M.W. Buie e, A.H. Parker f a Planetary Science Institute, 1700 East Fort Lowell, Suite 106, Tucson, AZ 85719, United States b Carnegie Institution of Washington, Department of Terrestrial Magnetism, 5241 Broad Branch Road, NW, Washington, DC 20015, United States c NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, 8800 Greenbelt Road, Code 693, Greenbelt, MD 20771, United States d Space Department, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, 11100 Johns Hopkins Road, Laurel, MD 20723, United States e Southwest Research Institute, 1050 Walnut St., Suite 300, Boulder, CO 80302, United States f Department of Astronomy, University of California at Berkeley, B-20 Hearst Field Annex #3411, Berkeley, CA 94720, United States article info abstract Article history: We report on Hubble Space Telescope (HST) observations of three Kuiper Belt Objects (KBOs), discovered Received 5 February 2014 in our dedicated ground-based search campaign, that are candidates for long-range observations from the Revised 14 April 2014 New Horizons spacecraft: 2011 JY31, 2011 HZ102, and 2013 LU35. Astrometry with HST enables both cur- Accepted 15 April 2014 rent and future critical accuracy improvements for orbit precision, required for possible New Horizons Available online 2 May 2014 observations, beyond what can be obtained from the ground. Photometric colors of all three objects are red, typical of the Cold Classical dynamical population within which they reside; they are also the Keywords: faintest KBOs to have had their colors measured.
    [Show full text]
  • Institute for Astronomy University of Hawai'i at M¯Anoa Publications in Calendar Year 2013
    Institute for Astronomy University of Hawai‘i at Manoa¯ Publications in Calendar Year 2013 Aberasturi, M., Burgasser, A. J., Mora, A., Reid, I. N., Barnes, J. E., & Privon, G. C. Experiments with IDEN- Looper, D., Solano, E., & Mart´ın, E. L. Hubble Space TIKIT. In ASP Conf. Ser. 477: Galaxy Mergers in an Telescope WFC3 Observations of L and T dwarfs. Evolving Universe, 89–96 (2013) Mem. Soc. Astron. Italiana, 84, 939 (2013) Batalha, N. M., et al., including Howard, A. W. Planetary Albrecht, S., Winn, J. N., Marcy, G. W., Howard, A. W., Candidates Observed by Kepler. III. Analysis of the First Isaacson, H., & Johnson, J. A. Low Stellar Obliquities in 16 Months of Data. ApJS, 204, 24 (2013) Compact Multiplanet Systems. ApJ, 771, 11 (2013) Bauer, J. M., et al., including Meech, K. J. Centaurs and Scat- Al-Haddad, N., et al., including Roussev, I. I. Magnetic Field tered Disk Objects in the Thermal Infrared: Analysis of Configuration Models and Reconstruction Methods for WISE/NEOWISE Observations. ApJ, 773, 22 (2013) Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections. Sol. Phys., 284, Baugh, P., King, J. R., Deliyannis, C. P., & Boesgaard, A. M. 129–149 (2013) A Spectroscopic Analysis of the Eclipsing Short-Period Aller, K. M., Kraus, A. L., & Liu, M. C. A Pan-STARRS + Binary V505 Persei and the Origin of the Lithium Dip. UKIDSS Search for Young, Wide Planetary-Mass Com- PASP, 125, 753–758 (2013) panions in Upper Sco. Mem. Soc. Astron. Italiana, 84, Beaumont, C. N., Offner, S. S. R., Shetty, R., Glover, 1038–1040 (2013) S. C.
    [Show full text]
  • A Proposal for a Research Settlement on 2011 HM102 and a Framework
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 7 April 2021 doi:10.20944/preprints202104.0215.v1 1 The Trojan Initiative: A Proposal For A Research Settlement On 2011 HM102 and A Framework for Future Settlement on Asteroids Briana Chen1*, Geetika Chitturi1*, Archit Kalra1*, Raghav Sriram1* 1: Carmel High School *: All authors contributed equally to the production of this manuscript and are hence written in alphabetical order. © 2021 by the author(s). Distributed under a Creative Commons CC BY license. Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 7 April 2021 doi:10.20944/preprints202104.0215.v1 2 Contents Abstract…………...………………………………………………………………………….....…4 Reason for Settling 2011 HM102…………………………………………………………....……...5 Population……..……………………………………………………………………………….….6 Travel to Settlement..……………………………………………………………………………...7 Antimatter Engine…………………………………………………………………………7 Settlement Materials .……………………………………………………………………………..9 Settlement Design .………………………………………………………………………………11 A Model For the Simulation of Artificial Gravity…………………………………….....11 Layout of Structure……………………………………………………………………....13 Power Sources…………………………………………………………………………...16 Shielding and Protection………………………………………………………….……..18 Maintenance of Life.………………………………………………………………………….....20 Importance of Growing Food………………………………………………….……...…20 Sustainable Crop Growth…………………………………………………….……...…..20 Water Recovery…………………………………………………………….……...…….22 Oxygen Recycling………………………………………………………….……………23 Eliminating Carbon Dioxide…………………………………………………………….24 Air Filtration………………………………………………….………………….………24
    [Show full text]
  • The Dynamics of Ringed Small Bodies
    THE DYNAMICS OF RINGED SMALL BODIES A Thesis Submitted by Jeremy R. Wood For the Award of Doctor of Philosophy 2018 Abstract In 2013, the startling discovery of a pair of rings around the Centaur 10199 Chariklo opened up a new subfield of astronomy - the study of ringed small bodies. Since that discovery, a ring has been discovered around the dwarf planet 136108 Haumea, and a re-examination of star occultation data for the Centaur 2060 Chiron showed it could have a ring structure of its own. The reason why the discovery of rings around Chariklo or Chiron is rather shocking is because Centaurs frequently suffer close encounters with the giant planets in the Centaur region, and these close encounters can not only fatally destroy any rings around a Centaur but can also destroy the small body itself. In this research, we determine the likelihood that any rings around Chariklo or Chiron could have formed before the body entered the Centaur region and survived up to the present day by avoiding ring-destroying close encounters with the giant planets. And in accordance with that, develop and then improve a scale to measure the severity of a close encounter between a ringed small body and a planet. We determine the severity of a close encounter by finding the minimum dis- tance obtained between the small body and the planet during the encounter, dmin, and comparing it to the critical distances of the Roche limit, tidal dis- ruption distance, the Hill radius and \ring limit". The values of these critical distances comprise our close encounter severity scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Michele Teodoro; B
    MAZZUCATO, Michele Teodoro; b. Savigliano (Cuneo), Italy, October 21, 1962; s. Walter Enzo Bruno Mazzucato and Maria Lucia Pozzi; m. Cesarina Antonella Papini June 6, 1992; children: Selene; Education: High School Diploma (Surveyor) and Geo-Topographer Qualification; Member: Academy of Sciences of Siena, Fellow of the Royal Astronomical Society, Italian Astronomical Society, Italian Association of Celestial Mechanics and Astrodynamics, Italian Society for Archaeoastronomy, Italian Society of Photogrammetry and Topography et al.; Honours and Awards: Knight of the Order for Merit of the Italian Republic, asteroid 35461=Mazzucato named in his honor, Meteorite Gold award (Secinaro, 2007), Honorary Citizenship of Camugnano (Bologna), Gualbertiana Medal, “Unghero pepolese d’oro” honor of the City of Castiglione dei Pepoli (Bologna) et al.; Discoveries: Main Belt asteroids, comets, supernovae (including two possible super-Chandrasekhar mass supernova), novae, Kuiper Belt Objects (including an L5 Neptune Trojan, 2011 HM102) and prime numbers; Publications: La Figura della Terra (The Figure of the Earth), 2003; Il Binocolo (The Binoculars), 2005; Triangoli Piani e loro risoluzione (Triangles Plans and their resolution), 2005; Elementi di Orientamento (Elements of Orientation), 2006; Un marinaio. Una storia (A Sailor. A Story), 2006; Raffaele Bendandi, 2007; Italiani nel Sistema Solare (Italians into Solar System), 2008; Giovanni Virginio Schiaparelli. Centenario della morte 1910-2010, 2010 and more than 200 refereed and popular papers; collaborator and editor Matematicamente.it Magazine and quarterly magazine L’hobby della scienza e della tecnica; Interests: history of astronomy, geometrical geodesy and Solar System minor bodies; Recreations: films, science fiction, bibliophile, coins, banknotes and stamps collection related to science..
    [Show full text]
  • Brno University of Technology Vysoké Učení Technické V Brně
    BRNO UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY VYSOKÉ UČENÍ TECHNICKÉ V BRNĚ FACULTY OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND COMMUNICATION FAKULTA ELEKTROTECHNIKY A KOMUNIKAČNÍCH TECHNOLOGIÍ DEPARTMENT OF FOREIGN LANGUAGES ÚSTAV JAZYKŮ COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY AND THE NEW HORIZONS MISSION TO PLUTO KOMUNIKAČNÍ TECHNOLOGIE A MISE NEW HORIZONS K PLUTU BACHELOR'S THESIS BAKALÁŘSKÁ PRÁCE AUTHOR Daria Yarkina AUTOR PRÁCE SUPERVISOR M. A. Kenneth Froehling VEDOUCÍ PRÁCE BRNO 2016 Bakalářská práce bakalářský studijní obor Angličtina v elektrotechnice a informatice Ústav jazyků Studentka: Daria Yarkina ID: 164237 Ročník: 3 Akademický rok: 2015/16 NÁZEV TÉMATU: Komunikační technologie a mise New Horizons k Plutu POKYNY PRO VYPRACOVÁNÍ: Pluto je vzdálený romantický svět a je stále považován za planetu pro mnoho lidí. Cílem této bakalařské práce je zmapovat literaturu na technologii komunikací, která slouží v misi New Horizons k Plutu, zejména v oblasti radioelektroniky, zvýrazněte schopnost kosmické sondy posílat signály miliardy kilometrů od Země a prezentovat své výsledky. DOPORUČENÁ LITERATURA: Robert S. Bokulic, A Decade of Advancements in Spacecraft Communications Technology at APL, Johns Hopkins APL Techncical Digest, Vol. 25, no. 4, 2004, pp. 286-294. http://www.jhuapl.edu/techdigest/td/td2504/bokulic.pdf Barrie W. Jones, Pluto: Sentinel of the Outer Solar System, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010 231 pp. ISBN 978-0-521-19436-5 Termín zadání: 11.2.2016 Termín odevzdání: 27.5.2016 Vedoucí práce: M. A. Kenneth Froehling Konzultant bakalářské práce: doc. PhDr. Milena Krhutová, Ph.D., předseda oborové rady UPOZORNĚNÍ: Autor bakalářské práce nesmí při vytváření bakalářské práce porušit autorská práva třetích osob, zejména nesmí zasahovat nedovoleným způsobem do cizích autorských práv osobnostních a musí si být plně vědom následků porušení ustanovení § 11 a následujících autorského zákona č.
    [Show full text]
  • 2550 (Created: Tuesday, March 30, 2021 at 7:23:07 PM Eastern Standard Time) - Overview
    JWST Proposal 2550 (Created: Tuesday, March 30, 2021 at 7:23:07 PM Eastern Standard Time) - Overview 2550 - The First Near-IR Spectroscopic Survey of Neptune Trojans Cycle: 1, Proposal Category: GO INVESTIGATORS Name Institution E-Mail Larissa Markwardt (PI) University of Michigan [email protected] Dr. Hsing Wen Lin (CoI) University of Michigan [email protected] Prof. David Gerdes (CoI) University of Michigan [email protected] Prof. Renu Malhotra (CoI) University of Arizona [email protected] Kevin Napier (CoI) University of Michigan [email protected] Dr. Fred Adams (CoI) University of Michigan [email protected] OBSERVATIONS Folder Observation Label Observing Template Science Target Observation Folder 1 NIRSpec IFU:2008 LC NIRSpec IFU Spectroscopy (2) 2008LC18 18 3 NIRSpec IFU: 2011 W NIRSpec IFU Spectroscopy (6) 2011WG157 G157 5 NIRSpec IFU: 2013 K NIRSpec IFU Spectroscopy (4) 2013KY18 Y18 7 NIRSpec IFU: 2011 H NIRSpec IFU Spectroscopy (3) 2011HM102 M102 10 NIRSpec IFU: 2013 V NIRSpec IFU Spectroscopy (5) 2013VX30 X30 11 NIRSpec IFU: 2006 RJ NIRSpec IFU Spectroscopy (12) 2006RJ103 103 12 NIRSpec IFU: 2007 VL NIRSpec IFU Spectroscopy (8) 2007VL305 305 1 JWST Proposal 2550 (Created: Tuesday, March 30, 2021 at 7:23:07 PM Eastern Standard Time) - Overview Folder Observation Label Observing Template Science Target 13 NIRSpec IFU: 2011 SO NIRSpec IFU Spectroscopy (7) 2011SO277 277 14 NIRSpec IFU: 2010 TS NIRSpec IFU Spectroscopy (11) 2010TS191 191 ABSTRACT Trojan asteroids, which librate around a planet’s L4 or L5 point, are thought to be remnants of our primordial disk as the strong 1:1 resonance means they can be stable on order the age of the Solar System.
    [Show full text]
  • The Trojan Color Conundrum (Pdf)
    The Astronomical Journal, 155:56 (7pp), 2018 February https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/aaa1a4 © 2018. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. The Trojan Color Conundrum David Jewitt1,2 1 Department of Earth, Planetary and Space Sciences, UCLA, 595 Charles Young Drive East, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1567, USA; [email protected] 2 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California at Los Angeles, 430 Portola Plaza, Box 951547, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1547, USA Received 2017 October 12; revised 2017 December 3; accepted 2017 December 11; published 2018 January 11 Abstract The Trojan asteroids of Jupiter and Neptune are likely to have been captured from original heliocentric orbits in the dynamically excited (“hot”) population of the Kuiper Belt. However, it has long been known that the optical color distributions of the Jovian Trojans and the hot population are not alike. This difference has been reconciled with the capture hypothesis by assuming that the Trojans were resurfaced (for example, by sublimation of near-surface volatiles) upon inward migration from the Kuiper Belt (where blackbody temperatures are ∼40 K) to Jupiter’s orbit (∼125 K). Here, we examine the optical color distribution of the Neptunian Trojans using a combination of new optical photometry and published data. We find a color distribution that is statistically indistinguishable from that of the Jovian Trojans but unlike any sub-population in the Kuiper Belt. This result is puzzling, because the Neptunian Trojans are very cold (blackbody temperature ∼50 K) and a thermal process acting to modify the surface colors at Neptune’s distance would also affect the Kuiper Belt objects beyond, where the temperatures are nearly identical.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Hm102: Discovery of a High-Inclination L5 Neptune Trojan in the Search for a Post-Pluto New Horizons Target
    The Astronomical Journal, 145:96 (6pp), 2013 April doi:10.1088/0004-6256/145/4/96 C 2013. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. 2011 HM102: DISCOVERY OF A HIGH-INCLINATION L5 NEPTUNE TROJAN IN THE SEARCH FOR A POST-PLUTO NEW HORIZONS TARGET Alex H. Parker1, Marc W. Buie2,DavidJ.Osip3, Stephen D. J. Gwyn4, Matthew J. Holman1, David M. Borncamp2, John R. Spencer2, Susan D. Benecchi5, Richard P. Binzel6, Francesca E. DeMeo6,Sebastian´ Fabbro4, Cesar I. Fuentes7, Pamela L. Gay8, J. J. Kavelaars4, Brian A. McLeod1, Jean-Marc Petit9, Scott S. Sheppard5, S. Alan Stern2, David J. Tholen10, David E. Trilling7, Darin A. Ragozzine1,11, Lawrence H. Wasserman12, and the Ice Hunters13 1 Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; [email protected] 2 Southwest Research Institute, 6220 Culebra Road, San Antonio, TX 78238, USA 3 Carnegie Observatories, Las Campanas Observatory, Casilla 601, La Serena, Chile 4 Canadian Astronomy Data Centre, National Research Council of Canada, 5071 W. Saanich Road, Victoria, BC V9E 2E7, Canada 5 Department of Terrestrial Magnetism, Carnegie Institute of Washington, 5251 Broad Branch Road NW, Washington, DC 20015, USA 6 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA 7 Department of Physics & Astronomy, Northern Arizona University, S San Francisco St, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USA 8 The Center for Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Research, Education, and Outreach, Southern
    [Show full text]
  • The Trojan Color Conundrum
    The Trojan Color Conundrum David Jewitt1;2 1Department of Earth, Planetary and Space Sciences, UCLA, 595 Charles Young Drive East, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1567 2Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California at Los Angeles, 430 Portola Plaza, Box 951547, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1547 [email protected] Received ; accepted The Astronomical Journal { 2 { ABSTRACT The Trojan asteroids of Jupiter and Neptune are likely to have been captured from original heliocentric orbits in the dynamically excited (\hot") population of the Kuiper belt. However, it has long been known that the optical color distribu- tions of the Jovian Trojans and the hot population are not alike. This difference has been reconciled with the capture hypothesis by assuming that the Trojans were resurfaced (for example, by sublimation of near-surface volatiles) upon in- ward migration from the Kuiper belt (where blackbody temperatures are ∼40 K) to Jupiter's orbit (∼125 K). Here, we examine the optical color distribution of the Neptunian Trojans using a combination of new optical photometry and published data. We find a color distribution that is statistically indistinguishable from that of the Jovian Trojans but unlike any sub-population in the Kuiper belt. This result is puzzling, because the Neptunian Trojans are very cold (blackbody temperature ∼50 K) and a thermal process acting to modify the surface colors at Neptune's distance would also affect the Kuiper belt objects beyond, where the temperatures are nearly identical. The distinctive color distributions of the Jovian and Neptunian Trojans thus present us with a conundrum: they are very similar to each other, suggesting either capture from a common source or sur- face modification by a common process.
    [Show full text]