Spring 1999, U
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Some Australian Legal Attitudes of the Nineteenth Century
Thus, within the greater part of the nineteenth century, legislative uniformity Tradition and Experiment: Some Australian Legal throughout the Empire was not encouraged for its own sake. There were cases Attitudes of the Nineteenth Century where a common standard was valuable, especially in areas of "la~vyers' law" where imperial Acts "codified" or settled complex legal principles. Chalmers' Sale of Goods Act7 is an enduring example. Otherwise, excepting laws affecting "At the present time, Australia is regarded as having emerged from the personal status, of which more is said below, the Colonial Office sympathized colonial state. However, in the field of ideas, its status is still colonial, and with local legislative experirneilts, and actively discouraged servile conformity: this is very apparent in the sphere of legal ideas. ." Thus wrote a critic of procedure in 1950,' and recently Professor Castles has "On balance, the bias within the Office was against uniformity, and against the said much the same of our nineteenth century court systems2 Within limits of literal translation of E~lglishlaw on to the colonial statute book, except in space, we seek to test such general views by sail~plesfrom three strata of law- those few cases where uniformity was clearly desirable in order to avoid con- making and legal administration-the parliaments, the courts, and the legal fusion, or where no obvious harm would ensue. Officials within the Office profession of nineteenth century Australia. were always well aware of the material differences between their own country Our reasons for including "Legislation" and "The Courts" will be obvious. and the various colonial societies, differences which made any hoped-for "The Profession" is, we think, an appropriate if neglected part of the trilogy. -
THE ADELAIDE LAW REVIEW Law.Adelaide.Edu.Au Adelaide Law Review ADVISORY BOARD
Volume 40, Number 3 THE ADELAIDE LAW REVIEW law.adelaide.edu.au Adelaide Law Review ADVISORY BOARD The Honourable Professor Catherine Branson AC QC Deputy Chancellor, The University of Adelaide; Former President, Australian Human Rights Commission; Former Justice, Federal Court of Australia Emeritus Professor William R Cornish CMG QC Emeritus Herchel Smith Professor of Intellectual Property Law, University of Cambridge His Excellency Judge James R Crawford AC SC International Court of Justice The Honourable Professor John J Doyle AC QC Former Chief Justice, Supreme Court of South Australia Professor John V Orth William Rand Kenan Jr Professor of Law, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Professor Emerita Rosemary J Owens AO Former Dean, Adelaide Law School The Honourable Justice Melissa Perry Federal Court of Australia The Honourable Margaret White AO Former Justice, Supreme Court of Queensland Professor John M Williams Dame Roma Mitchell Chair of Law and Former Dean, Adelaide Law School ADELAIDE LAW REVIEW Editors Associate Professor Matthew Stubbs and Dr Michelle Lim Book Review and Comment Editor Dr Stacey Henderson Associate Editors Kyriaco Nikias and Azaara Perakath Student Editors Joshua Aikens Christian Andreotti Mitchell Brunker Peter Dalrymple Henry Materne-Smith Holly Nicholls Clare Nolan Eleanor Nolan Vincent Rocca India Short Christine Vu Kate Walsh Noel Williams Publications Officer Panita Hirunboot Volume 40 Issue 3 2019 The Adelaide Law Review is a double-blind peer reviewed journal that is published twice a year by the Adelaide Law School, The University of Adelaide. A guide for the submission of manuscripts is set out at the back of this issue. -
Gov Gaz Week 6 Colour.Indd
777 15 Government Gazette OF THE STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES Number 41 Friday, 23 February 2001 Published under authority by the Government Printing Service LEGISLATION Proclamations Community Relations Commission and Principles of Multiculturalism Act 2000 No 77—Proclamation GORDON SAMUELS, , GovernorGovernor I, the Honourable Gordon Samuels AC, CVO, Governor of the State of New South Wales, with the advice of the Executive Council, and in pursuance of section 2 of the Community Relations Commission and Principles of Multiculturalism Act 2000, do, by this my Proclamation, appoint 13 March 2001 as the day on which that Act commences. Signed andat sealed sealed Sydney, at Sydney, this this 21st day day of of February 2001. 2001. By His Excellency’s Command, L.S. BOB CARR, M.P., Premier,Premier, Minister Minister for for the the Arts Arts and and Minister Minister for for CitizenshipCitizenship GOD SAVE THE QUEEN! p01-012-p01.846 Page 1 778 LEGISLATION 23 February 2001 Crimes Legislation Further Amendment Act 2000 No 107—Proclamation GORDON SAMUELS, , GovernorGovernor I, the Honourable Gordon Samuels AC, CVO, Governor of the State of New South Wales, with the advice of the Executive Council, and in pursuance of section 2 of the Crimes Legislation Further Amendment Act 2000, do, by this my Proclamation, appoint 23 February 2001 as the day on which the uncommenced provisions of that Act commence. Signed andand sealedsealed at at Sydney, Sydney, this this 21st day day of February of February 2001. 2001. By His Excellency’s Command, L.S. BOB DEBUS, M.P., AttorneyAttorney General GOD SAVE THE QUEEN! Explanatory note The object of this proclamation is to commence the provisions of the Crimes Legislation Further Amendment Act 2000 that relate to the offence of possession of substances called precursors. -
Contributors
Contributors Stefan.Auer Dr Stefan Auer is Senior Lecturer in History and Politics, Jean Monnet Chair in EU Interdisciplinary Studies and Director of the Innovative Universities European Union (IUEU) Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne. His book Liberal Nationalism in Central Europe (Routledge, 2004, pb 2006) won the prize for Best Book in European Studies (2005) awarded by the University Association for Contemporary European Studies (UACES). His recent publications include ‘“New Europe”: between cosmopolitan dreams and nationalist nightmares’ (Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 48, no. 5, 2010). John.Burgess John Burgess was the Australian Ambassador to Poland from 1980 to 1984. His earlier diplomatic experience included a posting in the Australian Embassy in Indonesia from 1965 to 1967, which covered the abortive communist coup there; a posting in Hong Kong from 1969 to 1972 in a China-watching position; and a posting to the USSR from 1975 to 1977 as deputy to the then Australian Ambassador, Sir James Plimsoll. During a later posting as Ambassador to Denmark and Norway from 1991 to 1995, he was in addition appointed Australian Ambassador to Latvia and Lithuania following the declarations of independence of those two countries, and he made numerous visits to both. Since his retirement in 1997, his occasional articles and reviews relating to his diplomatic experience have been published in magazines and newspapers. Antoni.Z ..Kamiński Professor Antoni Z. Kamiński holds the Chair of International Security and Strategic Studies at the Institute of Political Studies of the Polish Academy of Sciences. He is also Professor of Political Science at the Collegium Civitas in Warsaw. -
Bathurst010611.Pdf
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES BANCO COURT ALLSOP P AND JUDGES OF THE SUPREME COURT Wednesday 1 June 2011 SWEARING-IN CEREMONY OF THE HONOURABLE THOMAS FREDERICK BATHURST QC AS CHIEF JUSTICE OF NEW SOUTH WALES 1 BATHURST CJ: President, I have the honour to announce that I have been appointed Chief Justice of this Court. I present to you my Commission. 2 ALLSOP P: Thank you Chief Justice. Would you please be seated whilst the Commission is read. (Commission read) 3 Chief Justice, I now ask you to rise and take the oaths of office, first the oath of allegiance and then the judicial oath. (Oaths of office taken) 4 THE HONOURABLE GREG SMITH SC MP, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW SOUTH WALES: Your Honour, on behalf of the State of New South Wales and the New South Wales Bar, I congratulate you on your appointment as Chief Justice of the New South Wales Supreme Court. 5 You are now custodian of one of the oldest public offices in Australia. The first Chief Justice, Sir Francis Forbes, took his place in 1824 and you will - 1 - be the seventeenth. However, number five, Sir Julian Salomons, stepped down after fifteen days before he even got to hear a case. His problem was that his appointment was not well received. 6 This is not a problem facing your Honour. In fact, your elevation has been widely acclaimed, particularly among the Sydney Commercial Bar. One such beneficiary said, “Tom was simply briefed in every commercial matter of any significance going. -
Annual Report 2015–2016 Sir Moses Montefiore Jewish Home
SIR MOSES MONTEFIORE JEWISH HOME ANNUAL REPORT 2015–2016 SIR MOSES MONTEFIORE JEWISH HOME OUR MISSION: TO ENHANCE THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF OLDER PERSONS, BY PROVIDING AN EXCEPTIONAL STANDARD OF SERVICE AND CARE, EMBRACING THE RICHNESS OF JEWISH RELIGION, CULTURE AND TRADITION. Front cover photo: Hunters Hill resident, John Waxman with Therapy Assistant, Troy Zander Inside cover photo: Woollahra Manor resident, Herman Strykowski 1 SIR MOSES MONTEFIORE JEWISH HOME CONTENTS 4 Board of Management & Executive 42 Year in Review 5 Board Members 44 HomeCare and Day Centres 13 President’s Report 45 Who’s Who in the Home Don’t just live 16 CEO’s Report 47 Life Governors and Members 19 Treasurer’s Report 47 Montefiore Life Governors LIVE THE WAY YOU LIKE TO LIVE 24 Strategic Plan Update 50 Montefiore Members We believe in homes, not institutions . We believe in choice, because one size doesn’t fit all . 25 Certifying Philosophy of Living 58 Montefiore Volunteers And we believe there is more than one right way . 26 Foundation 60 Foundation Donations At Montefiore, we believe the only way that matters is your way. 30 Religious and Spiritual Life at Montefiore 62 Bequests That we are here to support your schedule, in your time and at your pace . 32 Montefiore and CHeBA Research for a 62 Memorial Donations Better Tomorrow That we’re all unique. And that we’re all writing our story . 62 Birthday Donations 34 Allied Health Supporting Care and At Montefiore, that’s what drives us . Helping you write your story. 65 Wedding and Anniversary Donations Service Delivery Because one story doesn’t fit all. -
2008Founders39i2.Pdf
Price 50c Registered by Australia Post Publication No. NBH 1271 Newsletter of Fellowship of First Fleeters' Inside this issue: News of Members 2 /;tl#f tie ~U'/lk,lft~ o~t 2008 is certainly brimming with renewed vigor and vitality. The celebration of our 40th A Convict Colony? 3 Anniversary on 27 March at Parliament House, Sydney, was a great event, with 130 people New School Honors attending, together with the Governor, Her Excellency Professor Marie Bashir, accompanied Our First 'Banker' 5 by Sir Nicholas Shehadie. Our host was Mr David Harris MP, Member for Wyong. Other guests included the President of the Society of Australian Genealogists, Mr Mal A Genealogical Codicil 5 Sainty; the President of the Women's Pioneer Association Australia, Mrs Marlene Reid, Margaret Hogge of the Sydney-Portsmouth Sister City Program and a representative of the Our Ruby Birthday 6-7 Historic Houses Trust. Vale Gordon Samuels 7 The initial meeting of a new chapter in the Ryde to Parramatta corridor will be held at the Ryde-Eastwood RSL Club on Saturday 5 April at 10.00am. Members in the region have First Fleet been mailed invitations three months ago and the response has been very encouraging. Memorial Garden 8-9 This is a pilot initiative of your Board to ascertain the feeling of members to the formation of district Chapters in the metropolitan area. First Fleet Piano 10 The Board ~as also agreed to change the printing format of Founders. As from and Foundlings Quiz 10 including the July/August magazine the size will be AS and will contain mainly articles of historic interest, with many First Fleeter stories. -
Imagereal Capture
No More Cabs on the Rank? Some Reflections About the Future ofLegal Practice" His Excellency The Honourable Gordon Samuels AC Governor ofNew South Wales It is a privilege to have been invited to deliver the Sir Ninian Stephen Lecture for 1998. This occasion honours one of Australia's outstanding jurists, and a man who has given remarkable service to his own, and the international, community. I appreciate that the title I have chosen for this paper falls a little short of total revelation. It is hardly in the "Road to Damascus" category. I had notintended to be deliberately obscure; or to availmyselfofthe academic technique ofchoosinga title of wide and indefinite ambit in order to per mit the maximum intellectual manoeuvre during the period of gestation.But I must confess that the use of the word "reflections" does allow some change of focus in respect of the conclusions to which these musings may lead. Now let me be more explicit. The reference to "cabs on the rank" identifies a fundamental rule of conduct at the Bar (and at other independent Bars in Australia) of such sanctity as to have been described as the barrister's equivalent of the doc tor's Hippocratic oath. l The cab-rank rule or principle may be described in this way:- "No brief or instructions may be refused, whether to act as an advocate or to advise, unless the barrister is professionally committed already, has notbeen offered a proper fee, is professionally embarrassed by a prior conflict of inter est or lacks sufficient experience or competence to handle the matter".2 * This article is a recension ofthe 1998 Sir NinianStephenLecture. -