(Coleoptera: Elateridae) Assemblages in the Acadian

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

(Coleoptera: Elateridae) Assemblages in the Acadian EFFECTS OF FOREST MANAGEMENT ON CLICK BEETLE (COLEOPTERA: ELATERIDAE) ASSEMBLAGES IN THE ACADIAN FOREST OF MAINE By Shelly L. Thomas B.S. Eastern University, 1995 A THESIS Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (in Ecology and Environmental Science) The Graduate School The University of Maine May, 2007 Advisory Committee: Robert G. Wagner, Henry W. Saunders Distinguished Professor in Forestry, Advisor William A. Halteman, Associate Professor of Mathematics and Statistics Malcolm L. Hunter, Jr., Libra Professor of Conservation Biology Alan S. White, Professor of Forest Ecology Francis A. Drummond, Professor of Insect Ecology and Insect Pest Management John C. Brissette, Research Forester and Project Leader, USDA Forest Service LIBRARY RIGHTS STATEMENT In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Maine, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for “fair use” copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the Librarian. It is understood that any copying of publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Signature: Date: EFFECTS OF FOREST MANAGEMENT ON CLICK BEETLE (COLEOPTERA: ELATERIDAE) ASSEMBLAGES IN THE ACADIAN FOREST OF MAINE By Shelly L. Thomas Thesis Advisor: Robert G. Wagner An Abstract of the Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (In Ecology and Environmental Science) May, 2007 Click beetle (Coleoptera: Elateridae) assemblages were examined in three experiments in the Acadian forest of Maine. First, I used flight intercept traps to compare Elaterid assemblages in stands that developed after clearcut, shelterwood, and selection harvests. Click beetle richness was highest in stands managed under a selection system and lowest in stands regenerated using the clearcut method. The abundance of click beetle species was lower in stands managed by clearcutting than in stands managed using the shelterwood and selection methods. Hardwood basal area was the best environmental predictor for both species richness and species abundance. Second, I examined whether Elaterid assemblages in soil were associated with hardwood (Maple, Birch, Aspen, Blueberry, and Oak) and softwood (Spruce-Fir-Pine, Pine, Hemlock, and Fern-Hemlock) cover types. Elaterid diversity was generally higher in hardwood than softwood stands. Species richness was lowest in the Spruce-Fir-Pine and highest in the Oak cover type. Species abundance was lowest in the Spruce-Fir-Pine and Pine and highest in the Oak, Maple, and Hemlock cover types. Assemblages in hardwood stands were less similar to those in coniferous stands than they were to each other, with assemblages in oak stands being least similar to those in coniferous or other hardwood stands. Four species of click beetle were more abundant in softwood stands, and seven species were associated with increases in specific softwood tree and shrub species. Nine species of click beetle were more abundant in hardwood stands, and fifteen species were associated with increases in specific hardwood tree and shrub species, including six species associated with oak stands. Third, I examined how the species richness, abundance, diversity, and assemblage similarity of click beetles inhabiting coarse woody material (CWM) were affected by gap harvesting and characteristics of the CWM (diameter, degree of decay, and wood type) in Maine’s Acadian forest. Species assemblages varied between harvest treatments, canopy conditions, CWM wood type (hardwood vs. softwood), and especially between CWM decay classes and among diameter classes. Size of harvest gap did not influence the species abundance of click beetles across the small range of gap sizes studied (0.01 to 0.21 ha), and there were few differences between the two harvest treatments. Four of the most common species had higher abundances in closed canopy than harvest gaps. Click beetle species richness and species abundance were higher in CWM that had larger diameters and were more decayed. Click beetle diversity was higher in softwood than hardwood CWM. i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my advisor, Bob Wagner; your encouragement, dedication, input, and sense of humor were invaluable and made it possible for me to complete my work. Thank you very, very much! Thank you to my committee members, including Frank Drummond and John Brissette, for your reviews, especially to Mac Hunter for inviting me to your “Mac Meetings,” Al White for your encouragement and time, and most especially to Bill Halteman for the many hours you spent helping me understand my statistical analyses and honing my statistical skills, and going above and beyond the call of duty when it was needed the most. Thank you to Rebecca Holberton and Dave Foster for participating in my comprehensive exams. Thanks to Steve Woods for making it possible for me to study click beetles. Susan Brawley, thank you for your dedication to excellent education, for your hard work at sustaining the GK-12 program, and for helping to make it possible for me to travel back to Kenya. Thank you to Steve Kingsbury for being such a good example of an excellent middle school science teacher. Thanks to the many graduate students who have helped me, including Hanne Jorgensen, Mike Saunders, Tom Woodcock, and the “Mac Meeting” students- Steve Campbell, Fred Beaudry, Dave Patrick, Sean Blomquist, and the late Dave Ververka. Thanks to Dick Dearborne and Charlene Donahue for the use of the MFS insect collection, to Tim Stone for his help with PEF data, and to my many student workers, without whom little could be accomplished. Sincere gratitude to Edward C. Becker and Serge Laplant for correcting my click beetle reference collections. Heartfelt thanks to Joe Sheldon, who guided me into the wonderful world of very small critters and who instigated my thinking about the deep connection between faith ii and ecology. Thanks to the staff and volunteers of Au Sable Environmental Institute, Christians for Biblical Equality, and A Rocha International for your dedication and witness. Thanks to my church families in PA and ME for praying for me through the years; special thanks to Pathway for helping me develop my gifts as the director of the Growth Rings Ministry. My deepest gratitude goes to the many friends who have prayed, laughed, and cried with me during this time, especially Kathy and Chris, Steph O., Traci, Gary, Christi, Jean, Karen, Steph N., Jenny, Megan, Joy, Amy, Fair, and Julie. I would especially like to thank Jack J. Heddon. My favorite memories of these grad school years are inundated with experiences I shared with you. Thank you for your loving friendship, for your enduring patience, for your constant encouragement, and for allowing me to learn from you. I love you, my friend, and I wish you well in all things. Mom and Dad, you have been my inspiration, my shelter, my encouragers, my teachers, and my most rabid fans! Thank you for raising me in a beautiful home, infecting me with your curiosity, passion, and joy, making it possible for me to travel the world, and supporting me through these years. Thank you for introducing me to the Beautiful One and to the Way. I love you both very much! Finally, to the One who was, who is, and who is to come: thank you for your creativity. Please help us to care for your creation and to love as you would have us love- with action, strength, humility, justice, mercy, and hope- and in so doing to create the community you desire. Baruch ata adonai, eloheinu melech ha'olam, borei ha'chipvushit! iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.................................................................................................ii LIST OF TABLES...............................................................................................................x LIST OF FIGURES..........................................................................................................xiv PROLOGUE........................................................................................................................1 Chapter 1. EFFECT OF SYLVICULTURAL METHODS AND ASSOCIATED STAND CHANGES ON CLICK BEETLE (COLEOPTERA: ELATERIDAE) ASSEMBLAGES IN MAINE’S REGION OF THE ACADIAN FOREST.......................6 1.1. Abstract............................................................................................................6 1.2. Introduction......................................................................................................7 1.3. Methods..........................................................................................................10 1.3.1. Study Site........................................................................................10 1.3.2. Measurements.................................................................................13 1.3.2.1. Beetle Sampling...............................................................13 1.3.2.2. Vegetation Sampling.......................................................14 1.3.3. Analytical Approach......................................................................15 1.4. Results...........................................................................................................18 1.4.1. Beetle Taxa.....................................................................................18 iv 1.4.2. Effect of Silvicultural Methods....................................................19
Recommended publications
  • Download Publication
    ELYTRON, 2002. VOL. 16: 00-00 ISSN: 0214-1353 89 DESCRIPTION O A NEW SPECIES O ATHOUS AND RECORD O THE EMALE O A. AZORICUS PLATIA & GUDENZI ROM THE AZORES (COLEOPTERA: ELATERIDAE)1 Giuseppe Platia Via Molino Vecchio, 21 47030 GATTEO (C). ITALY [email protected] Paulo A. V. Borges Univ.dos Açores, Dep. Ciências Agrárias, CITA-A, 9700-851 ANGRA DO HEROÍSMO. TERCEIRA. AÇORES Unidade de Macroecologia e Conservação (UMC), Univ. de Évora, ábrica dos Leões 7000-730 ÉVORA. PORTUGAL [email protected] ABSTRACT Description of a new species of Athous and record of the female of A. azoricus Platia & Gudenzi from the Azores (Coleoptera: Elateridae) Athous (Orthathous) pomboi n. sp. is described from the Santa Maria Island. It is the second species of this genus known from the Azorean Archipelago. The distinctive characters of the female of A. azoricus are given. Key words: Coleoptera, Elateridae, new species, Athous, Azores. INTRODUCTION The Azores, an archipelago of nine islands located in the North Atlantic, is not particularly rich in endemic beetles and other arthropods when compared with the other Macaronesian archipelagoes of Madeira and Canaries (BORGES, 1992). However, after a recent intensive survey of 15 Natural orest Reserves and other Azorean reserves (BALA «Biodiversity of Arthropods of the Laurisilva of the Azores» 1998-2002, see BORGES et al. 2000) several new arthropod taxa was discovered including some beetles (see BLAS & BORGES, 1999; BORGES et al., 1 This is the article number 11 of the Project BALA (see (http://www.nrel.colostate.edu/IBOY/ europe_ap.html#BALA) 90 G. PLATIA & P.
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2017/023486 Al 9 February 2017 (09.02.2017) P O P C T
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2017/023486 Al 9 February 2017 (09.02.2017) P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: 0552 (US). FENGLER, Kevin; 7250 NW 62nd Ave, P.O. AOlH l/00 (2006.01) C07K 14/195 (2006.01) Box 552, Johnston, IA 5013 1-0552 (US). SCHEPERS, A01H3/00 (2006.01) C12N 15/82 (2006.01) Eric; 7250 NW 62nd Ave, P.O. Box 552, Johnston, IA 5013 1-0552 (US). UDRANSZKY, Ingrid; 7250 NW 62nd (21) International Application Number: Ave, P.O. Box 552, Johnston, IA 5013 1-0552 (US). PCT/US20 16/04 1452 (74) Agent: BAUER, S., Christopher; Pioneer Hi-Bred Inter (22) International Filing Date: national, Inc., 7100 N.W. 62nd Avenue, Johnston, IA 8 July 2016 (08.07.2016) 5013 1-1014 (US). (25) Filing Language: English (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every (26) Publication Language: English kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, (30) Priority Data: BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, 62/201,977 6 August 2015 (06.08.2015) US DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, (71) Applicants: PIONEER HI-BRED INTERNATIONAL, HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JP, KE, KG, KN, KP, KR, INC. [US/US]; PIONEER HI-BRED INTERNATIONAL, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, INC., 7100 N.W.
    [Show full text]
  • The Beetle Fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and Distribution
    INSECTA MUNDI, Vol. 20, No. 3-4, September-December, 2006 165 The beetle fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and distribution Stewart B. Peck Department of Biology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada stewart_peck@carleton. ca Abstract. The beetle fauna of the island of Dominica is summarized. It is presently known to contain 269 genera, and 361 species (in 42 families), of which 347 are named at a species level. Of these, 62 species are endemic to the island. The other naturally occurring species number 262, and another 23 species are of such wide distribution that they have probably been accidentally introduced and distributed, at least in part, by human activities. Undoubtedly, the actual numbers of species on Dominica are many times higher than now reported. This highlights the poor level of knowledge of the beetles of Dominica and the Lesser Antilles in general. Of the species known to occur elsewhere, the largest numbers are shared with neighboring Guadeloupe (201), and then with South America (126), Puerto Rico (113), Cuba (107), and Mexico-Central America (108). The Antillean island chain probably represents the main avenue of natural overwater dispersal via intermediate stepping-stone islands. The distributional patterns of the species shared with Dominica and elsewhere in the Caribbean suggest stages in a dynamic taxon cycle of species origin, range expansion, distribution contraction, and re-speciation. Introduction windward (eastern) side (with an average of 250 mm of rain annually). Rainfall is heavy and varies season- The islands of the West Indies are increasingly ally, with the dry season from mid-January to mid- recognized as a hotspot for species biodiversity June and the rainy season from mid-June to mid- (Myers et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter Alaska Entomological Society
    Newsletter of the Alaska Entomological Society Volume 12, Issue 1, March 2019 In this issue: Some food items of introduced Alaska blackfish (Dallia pectoralis T. H. Bean, 1880) in Kenai, Alaska8 Announcements . .1 Two new records of mayflies (Ephemeroptera) Arthropods potentially associated with spruce from Alaska . 11 (Picea spp.) in Interior Alaska . .2 Changes in soil fungal communities in response to A second Alaska record for Polix coloradella (Wals- invasion by Lumbricus terrestris Linnaeus, 1758 ingham, 1888) (Lepidoptera: Gelechioidea: Oe- at Stormy Lake, Nikiski, Alaska . 12 cophoridae), the “Skunk Moth” . .5 Review of the twelfth annual meeting . 19 Announcements New research to assess the risk of ticks tat suitability and probabilistic establishment model to dis- cover the climatic limits and probability of tick survival and tick-borne pathogens in Alaska in Alaska. For more information on ticks in Alaska and to learn how you can Submit-A-Tick, please visit: https: The geographic range of many tick species has expanded //dec.alaska.gov/eh/vet/ticks (website is in develop- substantially due to changes in climate, land use, and an- ment) or contact Dr. Micah Hahn ([email protected]). imal and human movement. With Alaska trending to- wards longer summers and milder winters, there is grow- ing concern about ticks surviving further north. Recent th passive surveillance efforts in Alaska have revealed that 69 Western Forest Insect Work Confer- non-native ticks—some with significant medical and vet- ence erinary importance—are present in the state. There is a new collaborative effort between the University of Alaska, The 69th Western Forest Insect Work Conference will the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, and the Of- be held April 22–25 2019 in Anchorage, Alaska at fice of the State Veterinarian to understand the risk of the Anchorage Marriott Downtown.
    [Show full text]
  • Spore Dispersal Vectors
    Glime, J. M. 2017. Adaptive Strategies: Spore Dispersal Vectors. Chapt. 4-9. In: Glime, J. M. Bryophyte Ecology. Volume 1. 4-9-1 Physiological Ecology. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Last updated 3 June 2020 and available at <http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology/>. CHAPTER 4-9 ADAPTIVE STRATEGIES: SPORE DISPERSAL VECTORS TABLE OF CONTENTS Dispersal Types ............................................................................................................................................ 4-9-2 Wind Dispersal ............................................................................................................................................. 4-9-2 Splachnaceae ......................................................................................................................................... 4-9-4 Liverworts ............................................................................................................................................. 4-9-5 Invasive Species .................................................................................................................................... 4-9-5 Decay Dispersal............................................................................................................................................ 4-9-6 Animal Dispersal .......................................................................................................................................... 4-9-9 Earthworms ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • (Coleoptera) of Peru Miguel A
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Insecta Mundi Florida 2-29-2012 Preliminary checklist of the Cerambycidae, Disteniidae, and Vesperidae (Coleoptera) of Peru Miguel A. Monné Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, [email protected] Eugenio H. Nearns University of New Mexico, [email protected] Sarah C. Carbonel Carril Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Peru, [email protected] Ian P. Swift California State Collection of Arthropods, [email protected] Marcela L. Monné Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi Part of the Entomology Commons Monné, Miguel A.; Nearns, Eugenio H.; Carbonel Carril, Sarah C.; Swift, Ian P.; and Monné, Marcela L., "Preliminary checklist of the Cerambycidae, Disteniidae, and Vesperidae (Coleoptera) of Peru" (2012). Insecta Mundi. Paper 717. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/717 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Florida at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Insecta Mundi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. INSECTA MUNDI A Journal of World Insect Systematics 0213 Preliminary checklist of the Cerambycidae, Disteniidae, and Vesperidae (Coleoptera) of Peru Miguel A. Monné Museu Nacional Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Quinta da Boa Vista São Cristóvão, 20940-040 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil Eugenio H. Nearns Department of Biology Museum of Southwestern Biology University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001, USA Sarah C. Carbonel Carril Departamento de Entomología Museo de Historia Natural Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos Avenida Arenales 1256, Lima, Peru Ian P.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution and Genomic Basis of Beetle Diversity
    The evolution and genomic basis of beetle diversity Duane D. McKennaa,b,1,2, Seunggwan Shina,b,2, Dirk Ahrensc, Michael Balked, Cristian Beza-Bezaa,b, Dave J. Clarkea,b, Alexander Donathe, Hermes E. Escalonae,f,g, Frank Friedrichh, Harald Letschi, Shanlin Liuj, David Maddisonk, Christoph Mayere, Bernhard Misofe, Peyton J. Murina, Oliver Niehuisg, Ralph S. Petersc, Lars Podsiadlowskie, l m l,n o f l Hans Pohl , Erin D. Scully , Evgeny V. Yan , Xin Zhou , Adam Slipinski , and Rolf G. Beutel aDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; bCenter for Biodiversity Research, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; cCenter for Taxonomy and Evolutionary Research, Arthropoda Department, Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; dBavarian State Collection of Zoology, Bavarian Natural History Collections, 81247 Munich, Germany; eCenter for Molecular Biodiversity Research, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; fAustralian National Insect Collection, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia; gDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, Institute for Biology I (Zoology), University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany; hInstitute of Zoology, University of Hamburg, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany; iDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Wien, Wien 1030, Austria; jChina National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, 518083 Guangdong, People’s Republic of China; kDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oregon State
    [Show full text]
  • A Faunal Survey of the Elateroidea of Montana by Catherine Elaine
    A faunal survey of the elateroidea of Montana by Catherine Elaine Seibert A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Entomology Montana State University © Copyright by Catherine Elaine Seibert (1993) Abstract: The beetle family Elateridae is a large and taxonomically difficult group of insects that includes many economically important species of cultivated crops. Elaterid larvae, or wireworms, have a history of damaging small grains in Montana. Although chemical seed treatments have controlled wireworm damage since the early 1950's, it is- highly probable that their availability will become limited, if not completely unavailable, in the near future. In that event, information about Montana's elaterid fauna, particularity which species are present and where, will be necessary for renewed research efforts directed at wireworm management. A faunal survey of the superfamily Elateroidea, including the Elateridae and three closely related families, was undertaken to determine the species composition and distribution in Montana. Because elateroid larvae are difficult to collect and identify, the survey concentrated exclusively on adult beetles. This effort involved both the collection of Montana elateroids from the field and extensive borrowing of the same from museum sources. Results from the survey identified one artematopid, 152 elaterid, six throscid, and seven eucnemid species from Montana. County distributions for each species were mapped. In addition, dichotomous keys, and taxonomic and biological information, were compiled for various taxa. Species of potential economic importance were also noted, along with their host plants. Although the knowledge of the superfamily' has been improved significantly, it is not complete.
    [Show full text]
  • New Species and New Records of Click Beetles from the Palearctic Region (Coleoptera, Elateridae)
    Boletín de la Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa (S.E.A.), nº 48 (30/06/2011): 47‒60. NEW SPECIES AND NEW RECORDS OF CLICK BEETLES FROM THE PALEARCTIC REGION (COLEOPTERA, ELATERIDAE) Giuseppe Platia Via Molino Vecchio, 21/a, 47043 Gatteo (FC), Italia – [email protected] Abstract: Fourteen new species of click beetles belonging to the genera Cardiophorus (Turkey), Dicronychus (Syria), Dima (Greece), Hemicrepidius (Azerbaijan), Athous (Orthathous) (Azerbaijan), Agriotes (Lebanon), Ampedus (Sardinia, It- aly), Ctenicera (Slovenia), Anostirus (Azerbaijan), Selatosomus (Warchalowskia) (Turkey), Adrastus (Azerbaijan) and Melanotus (Lebanon) are described. New chorological data for fifty-one species from the Palaearctic region are given. Key words: Coleoptera, Elateridae, new species, new records, Palaearctic region. Nuevas species y registros de elatéridos paleárticos (Coleoptera, Elateridae) Resumen: Se describen catorce nuevas especies de elatéridos de los géneros Cardiophorus (Turquía), Dicronychus (Siria), Dima (Grecia), Hemicrepidius (Azerbayán), Athous (Orthathous) (Azerbayán), Agriotes (Líbano), Ampedus (Cerdeña, Italia), Ctenicera (Eslovenia), Anostirus (Azerbayán), Selatosomus (Warchalowskia) (Turquía), Adrastus (Azerbayán) and Melanotus (Líbano). Se aportan además cincuenta y una nuevas citas de la región Paleártica. Palabras clave: Coleoptera, Elateridae, especies nuevas, cita nueva, región Paleártica. Taxonomy / Taxonomía: Adrastus azerbaijanicus n. sp. Athous (Orthathous) lasoni n. sp. Hemicrepidius kroliki n. sp. Agriotes kairouzi
    [Show full text]
  • Wireworms' Management
    Insects 2013, 4, 117-152; doi:10.3390/insects4010117 OPEN ACCESS insects ISSN 2075-4450 www.mdpi.com/journal/insects Review :LUHZRUPV¶Management: An Overview of the Existing Methods, with Particular Regards to Agriotes spp. (Coleoptera: Elateridae) Fanny Barsics *, Eric Haubruge and François J. Verheggen Department of Functional and Evolutionary Entomology, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liege. 2, Passage des Déportés, 5030 Gembloux, Belgium; E-Mails: [email protected] (E.H.); [email protected] (F.J.V.) * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +3281-62-26-63; Fax: +3281-62-23-12. Received: 19 October 2012; in revised form: 13 December 2012 / Accepted: 26 December 2012 / Published: 25 January 2013 Abstract: Wireworms (Coleoptera: Elateridae) are important soil dwelling pests worldwide causing yield losses in many crops. The progressive restrictions in the matter of efficient synthetic chemicals for health and environmental care brought out the need for alternative management techniques. This paper summarizes the main potential tools that have been studied up to now and that could be applied together in integrated pest management systems and suggests guidelines for future research. Keywords: wireworms; click beetles; Agriotes; integrated pest management 1. Introduction Wireworms are the larvae of click beetles (Coleoptera: Elateridae). They consist of more than 9,000 species distributed worldwide, [1] and some are important pests of a wide variety of crops, such as potato, cereals, carrot, sugar beet, sugarcane and soft fruits (e.g., [2±6]). In Europe, damages due to wireworm infestation are mainly attributed to the genus Agriotes Eschscholtz, as witnessed by the numerous studies aiming at their management.
    [Show full text]
  • Insects of Larose Forest (Excluding Lepidoptera and Odonates)
    Insects of Larose Forest (Excluding Lepidoptera and Odonates) • Non-native species indicated by an asterisk* • Species in red are new for the region EPHEMEROPTERA Mayflies Baetidae Small Minnow Mayflies Baetidae sp. Small minnow mayfly Caenidae Small Squaregills Caenidae sp. Small squaregill Ephemerellidae Spiny Crawlers Ephemerellidae sp. Spiny crawler Heptageniiidae Flatheaded Mayflies Heptageniidae sp. Flatheaded mayfly Leptophlebiidae Pronggills Leptophlebiidae sp. Pronggill PLECOPTERA Stoneflies Perlodidae Perlodid Stoneflies Perlodid sp. Perlodid stonefly ORTHOPTERA Grasshoppers, Crickets and Katydids Gryllidae Crickets Gryllus pennsylvanicus Field cricket Oecanthus sp. Tree cricket Tettigoniidae Katydids Amblycorypha oblongifolia Angular-winged katydid Conocephalus nigropleurum Black-sided meadow katydid Microcentrum sp. Leaf katydid Scudderia sp. Bush katydid HEMIPTERA True Bugs Acanthosomatidae Parent Bugs Elasmostethus cruciatus Red-crossed stink bug Elasmucha lateralis Parent bug Alydidae Broad-headed Bugs Alydus sp. Broad-headed bug Protenor sp. Broad-headed bug Aphididae Aphids Aphis nerii Oleander aphid* Paraprociphilus tesselatus Woolly alder aphid Cicadidae Cicadas Tibicen sp. Cicada Cicadellidae Leafhoppers Cicadellidae sp. Leafhopper Coelidia olitoria Leafhopper Cuernia striata Leahopper Draeculacephala zeae Leafhopper Graphocephala coccinea Leafhopper Idiodonus kelmcottii Leafhopper Neokolla hieroglyphica Leafhopper 1 Penthimia americana Leafhopper Tylozygus bifidus Leafhopper Cercopidae Spittlebugs Aphrophora cribrata
    [Show full text]
  • Ours to Save: the Distribution, Status & Conservation Needs of Canada's Endemic Species
    Ours to Save The distribution, status & conservation needs of Canada’s endemic species June 4, 2020 Version 1.0 Ours to Save: The distribution, status & conservation needs of Canada’s endemic species Additional information and updates to the report can be found at the project website: natureconservancy.ca/ourstosave Suggested citation: Enns, Amie, Dan Kraus and Andrea Hebb. 2020. Ours to save: the distribution, status and conservation needs of Canada’s endemic species. NatureServe Canada and Nature Conservancy of Canada. Report prepared by Amie Enns (NatureServe Canada) and Dan Kraus (Nature Conservancy of Canada). Mapping and analysis by Andrea Hebb (Nature Conservancy of Canada). Cover photo credits (l-r): Wood Bison, canadianosprey, iNaturalist; Yukon Draba, Sean Blaney, iNaturalist; Salt Marsh Copper, Colin Jones, iNaturalist About NatureServe Canada A registered Canadian charity, NatureServe Canada and its network of Canadian Conservation Data Centres (CDCs) work together and with other government and non-government organizations to develop, manage, and distribute authoritative knowledge regarding Canada’s plants, animals, and ecosystems. NatureServe Canada and the Canadian CDCs are members of the international NatureServe Network, spanning over 80 CDCs in the Americas. NatureServe Canada is the Canadian affiliate of NatureServe, based in Arlington, Virginia, which provides scientific and technical support to the international network. About the Nature Conservancy of Canada The Nature Conservancy of Canada (NCC) works to protect our country’s most precious natural places. Proudly Canadian, we empower people to safeguard the lands and waters that sustain life. Since 1962, NCC and its partners have helped to protect 14 million hectares (35 million acres), coast to coast to coast.
    [Show full text]