TRMM and Lightning Observations of a Low-Pressure System Over the Eastern Mediterranean by K

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

TRMM and Lightning Observations of a Low-Pressure System Over the Eastern Mediterranean by K TRMM and Lightning Observations of a Low-Pressure System over the Eastern Mediterranean BY K. LAGOUVARDOS AND V. KOTRONI ^ ignificant cyclone activity occurs in the Mediter- \ ranean area, mainly during the cold season. As J most of these cyclones form over the sea, space- borne platforms are especially useful for observing these systems. Moreover, during the cold season, lightning usually occurs over the relatively warm sur- face waters, and thus lightning detection data can also help us study the evolution of convective systems. OBSERVATIONS. During 4-6 November 2004, a low-pressure system formed over the southern part of the central Mediterranean, namely, over the Gulf of Sidra. During the two following days, the low- pressure system moved northeastward, producing significant lightning over the sea, while on 5 Novem- ber, heavy precipitation fell in Crete; two stations in western Crete accumulated more than 145 mm of rain during the 36 h ending at 0600 UTC 6 November. Figure la shows the mean sea level pressure at 0000 UTC 4 November [as given by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) analyses] with a low-pressure center of 1006 hPa northwest of the Gulf of Sidra. The surface low was associated with a cut- FIG. I. (a) ECMWF analysis of mean sea level pressure off low at 500 hPa (Fig. lb), while a strong upper-level (solid lines at 3-hPa interval) valid at 0000 UTC 4 Nov 2004. (b) As in (a), except for the 500-hPa geopotential jet streak exceeding 50 m s_1 was also evident at 300 hPa height (solid lines at 40-m interval) and the 300-hPa (blue shading in Fig. lb). The area north from the Gulf wind speed (shaded contours at 10 m s~' interval, only of Sidra and west of Crete was under the left-hand exit values exceeding 30 m s_l are shown). region of the jet streak, an area associated with signifi- cant divergence at the higher tropospheric layers. Data from NASA's Quick Scatterometer (QuikSCAT) at approximately 25-km horizontal resolution (avail- AFFILIATIONS: LAGOUVARDOS AND KOTRONI—National Observa- able online at http://podaac.jpl.nasa.gov/quikscat) al- tory of Athens, Institute of Environmental Research and Sustain- lows inspection of the surface wind field. The significant able Development, Athens, Greece sea level pressure gradient at about 0400 UTC 4 Novem- CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Dr. K. Lagouvardos, National Observatory of Athens, Institute of Environmental Research ber, the time of the satellite passage over the area, was and Sustainable Development, Lofos Koufou, R Penteli, 15236, associated with strong surface winds (see Fig. 2). Figure -1 Athens, Greece 2 shows wind speeds exceeding 17 m s around the low E-mail: [email protected] center, while very strong easterly winds prevail over the maritime area northeast of the low center. DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-88-9-I363 Figure 3 shows the cloud-to-ground lightning ©2007 American Meteorological Society with data provided by the ZEUS lightning-detection BAflS* | 1363 AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY UnauthenticatedSEPTEMBE | DownloadedR 2007 10/01/21 02:07 AM UTC network operated by the National Observatory of Athens during 2004 (Anagnostou et al. 2002). The ZEUS network consists of five very low-frequency (VLF) sensors installed across Europe. Figure 3 shows the lightning detected during four 1-h periods at 0000- 0100,0600-0700,1200-1300, and 1800-1900 UTC. Indeed, there is significant lightning activity from 0000 to 0600 4 November, progressing slowly eastward. The lightning activity is weaker near FIG. 2. The 10-m wind field provided by QuikSCAT (one barb: 5 M s~'; one 1 the low-pressure center com- half-barb: 2.5 m s ), valid at -0400 UTC 4 Nov 2004. Rain-contaminated QuikSCAT winds have been removed. pared with the maritime area to the northeast, where QuikSCAT shows convergence (Fig. 2). During 1200-1800 UTC Figure 4a presents the VIRS infrared image, as 4 November, the lightning activity decreases while it well as TMI brightness temperature observations progresses farther east. at 19- (vertical polarization, Fig. 4b) and 85.5-GHz The Tropical Rainfall Measurement Mission polarization-corrected temperature (PCT; Fig. 4c) (TRMM) satellite provides additional collocated from the TRMM passage over the study area at 0012 spaceborne observations. TRMM is a low-orbit sat- UTC 4 November 2004. (PCT is defined by Spencer ellite (flying at -400 km since mid-August 2001) on et al. in the April 1989 Journal of Atmospheric and a tropical path that covers (with some of its instru- Oceanic Technology.) VIRS imagery (Fig. 4a) reveals ments) a belt between 38°N and 38°S, providing very the banded structure around the low-pressure center, useful observations (e.g., brightness temperatures, as well as an area with significant convection west of radar reflectivities) from which microphysical char- Crete (35°-36°N, 20°E), while a cloud-free area is evi- acteristics of weather systems over the southern part dent over the maritime area between the low-pressure of the Mediterranean basin can be inferred. center and the convective area to the east. TRMM carries the following three main instru- Images at 19 GHz are extremely valuable for rain- ments: fall mapping, because this frequency is much less susceptible to ice-scattering effects than the higher • Visible and Infrared Scanner (VIRS): A five-chan- frequencies (e.g., 37 and 85.5 GHz) and can be used nel, cross-track-scanning radiometer operating at 0.63,1.6,3.75,10.8, and 12 ^m (the radiances mea- sured by VIRS can be used to infer cloud coverage, cloud type, and cloud-top temperatures); • TRMM Microwave Imager (TMI): A multichan- nel passive microwave radiometer operating at five frequencies (10.65, 19.35, 37.0, and 85.5 GHz at dual polarization, and 22.235 GHz at single polarization) that provides information on the integrated column precipitation content, cloud liquid water, ice water path, rain intensity, and rainfall types; • Precipitation Radar (PR): An electronically scan- ning radar, operating at 13.8 GHz, which provides the 3D structure of reflectivity over both land and FIG. 3. Lightning activity as sensed by ZEUS lightning ocean, from which information about the vertical detection network during l-h periods beginning at structure of precipitation systems is obtained. 0000, 0600, 1200, and 1800 UTC 4 Nov 2004. 1364 I BAflfr SEPTEMBER 2007 Unauthenticated | Downloaded 10/01/21 02:07 AM UTC as an estimate of the vertically integrated rainwater content. The rainbands around the low-pressure sys- tem are evident, with a rain-free area over the storm center. A major rainband is also evident over the maritime area northeast of the low center, coinciding with the area of convection shown in Fig. 4a and the area of significant lightning depicted in Fig. 3. Figure 4c presents the corresponding TMI PCT image at the 85.5-GHz channel. The resolution at this frequency is -6.7 km x 4 km, which is much finer than the -30 km x 18 km resolution at 19 GHz. Scattering from precipitation-sized ice is the dominant process at that frequency. Low PCT values at that frequency are an indication of significant scattering resulting from the large ice-water path of precipitation-sized ice particles. The band northeast of the low center contains very low brightness temperatures, down to 150-160 K in the area around 35°-36°N, 20°E. The presence of ice and mixed-phase hydrometeors is related to lightning, an idea that has been pointed out in some of the recent literature by Toracinta, Katsanos, and others that we recommend to the reader below. The comparison of Fig. 4c with Fig. 3 provides additional evidence of the good correlation between ice within clouds and lightning. Finally, Fig. 5 shows the 3-km AGL reflectivity field over the area, as measured by TRMM PR, and indicates the highest reflectivity cores within the rainbands also depicted in Fig. 4 (note that PR swath is -3 times narrower than the corresponding TMI swath). Reflectivity values at that level reach 45 dBZ in the area of the lowest 85.5-GHz PCT values, while a rain-free area is evident between the low-pressure center and the convective area to the east. RESULTS OF MODEL SIMULATIONS. We simulated this event with the fifth-generation Pennsylvania State University (PSU)-National Cen- ter for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) Mesoscale FIG. 4. (a) TRMM VIRS observations and (b) TMI bright- Model (MM5) (version 3.5). MM5 is a nonhydrostatic, ness temperature at 19-GHz vertical polarization channel, at 0012 4 Nov 2004. (c) As in (b), except primitive-equation model using terrain-following UTC for 85.5-GHz PCT. coordinates. We selected parameterizations based on our previous comparative study of convective and microphysical schemes (in Geophysical Research Grid 2 (9-km spacing), covering the central Mediter- Letters, 28,1977-1980), the Kain-Fritsch scheme for ranean. For the vertical dimension, we selected 30 the convective parameterization, and the scheme pro- unevenly spaced full-sigma levels. posed by P. Schultz for the explicit microphysics. The simulations were initialized at 1200 UTC 3 For this study, we defined the following two one- November 2004 and lasted for 36 h. The ECMWF way nested grids as such: Grid 1 (with 36-km spac- gridded analysis fields at 6-h intervals and at 0.5° ing), covering the major part of southern Europe, the latitude x 0.5° longitude horizontal grid increment Mediterranean, and the northern African coasts; and were the initial and boundary conditions. Figure 6a BAflS* | 1365 AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY UnauthenticatedSEPTEMBE | DownloadedR 2007 10/01/21 02:07 AM UTC CONCLUSIONS.
Recommended publications
  • Pressure Gradient Force Examples of Pressure Gradient Hurricane Andrew, 1992 Extratropical Cyclone
    4/29/2011 Chapter 7: Forces and Force Balances Forces that Affect Atmospheric Motion Pressure gradient force Fundamental force - Gravitational force FitiFrictiona lfl force Centrifugal force Apparent force - Coriolis force • Newton’s second law of motion states that the rate of change of momentum (i.e., the acceleration) of an object , as measured relative relative to coordinates fixed in space, equals the sum of all the forces acting. • For atmospheric motions of meteorological interest, the forces that are of primary concern are the pressure gradient force, the gravitational force, and friction. These are the • Forces that Affect Atmospheric Motion fundamental forces. • Force Balance • For a coordinate system rotating with the earth, Newton’s second law may still be applied provided that certain apparent forces, the centrifugal force and the Coriolis force, are • Geostrophic Balance and Jetstream ESS124 included among the forces acting. ESS124 Prof. Jin-Jin-YiYi Yu Prof. Jin-Jin-YiYi Yu Pressure Gradient Force Examples of Pressure Gradient Hurricane Andrew, 1992 Extratropical Cyclone (from Meteorology Today) • PG = (pressure difference) / distance • Pressure gradient force goes from high pressure to low pressure. • Closely spaced isobars on a weather map indicate steep pressure gradient. ESS124 ESS124 Prof. Jin-Jin-YiYi Yu Prof. Jin-Jin-YiYi Yu 1 4/29/2011 Gravitational Force Pressure Gradients • • Pressure Gradients – The pressure gradient force initiates movement of atmospheric mass, widfind, from areas o fhihf higher to areas o flf
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5. Meridional Structure of the Atmosphere 1
    Chapter 5. Meridional structure of the atmosphere 1. Radiative imbalance 2. Temperature • See how the radiative imbalance shapes T 2. Temperature: potential temperature 2. Temperature: equivalent potential temperature 3. Humidity: specific humidity 3. Humidity: saturated specific humidity 3. Humidity: saturated specific humidity Last time • Saturated adiabatic lapse rate • Equivalent potential temperature • Convection • Meridional structure of temperature • Meridional structure of humidity Today’s topic • Geopotential height • Wind 4. Pressure / geopotential height • From a hydrostatic balance and perfect gas law, @z RT = @p − gp ps T dp z(p)=R g p Zp • z(p) is called geopotential height. • If we assume that T and g does not vary a lot with p, geopotential height is higher when T increases. 4. Pressure / geopotential height • If we assume that g and T do not vary a lot with p, RT z(p)= (ln p ln p) g s − • z increases as p decreases. • Higher T increases geopotential height. 4. Pressure / geopotential height • Geopotential height is lower at the low pressure system. • Or the high pressure system corresponds to the high geopotential height. • T tends to be low in the region of low geopotential height. 4. Pressure / geopotential height The mean height of the 500 mbar surface in January , 2003 4. Pressure / geopotential height • We can discuss about the slope of the geopotential height if we know the temperature. R z z = (T T )(lnp ln p) warm − cold g warm − cold s − • We can also discuss about the thickness of an atmospheric layer if we know the temperature. RT z z = (ln p ln p ) p1 − p2 g 2 − 1 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Pressure Gradient Force
    2/2/2015 Chapter 7: Forces and Force Balances Forces that Affect Atmospheric Motion Pressure gradient force Fundamental force - Gravitational force Frictional force Centrifugal force Apparent force - Coriolis force • Newton’s second law of motion states that the rate of change of momentum (i.e., the acceleration) of an object, as measured relative to coordinates fixed in space, equals the sum of all the forces acting. • For atmospheric motions of meteorological interest, the forces that are of primary concern are the pressure gradient force, the gravitational force, and friction. These are the • Forces that Affect Atmospheric Motion fundamental forces. • Force Balance • For a coordinate system rotating with the earth, Newton’s second law may still be applied provided that certain apparent forces, the centrifugal force and the Coriolis force, are • Geostrophic Balance and Jetstream ESS124 included among the forces acting. ESS124 Prof. Jin-Yi Yu Prof. Jin-Yi Yu Pressure Gradient Force Examples of Pressure Gradient Hurricane Andrew, 1992 Extratropical Cyclone (from Meteorology Today) • PG = (pressure difference) / distance • Pressure gradient force goes from high pressure to low pressure. • Closely spaced isobars on a weather map indicate steep pressure gradient. ESS124 ESS124 Prof. Jin-Yi Yu Prof. Jin-Yi Yu 1 2/2/2015 Balance of Force in the Vertical: Pressure Gradients Hydrostatic Balance • Pressure Gradients – The pressure gradient force initiates movement of atmospheric mass, wind, from areas of higher to areas of lower pressure Vertical
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7 Isopycnal and Isentropic Coordinates
    Chapter 7 Isopycnal and Isentropic Coordinates The two-dimensional shallow water model can carry us only so far in geophysical uid dynam- ics. In this chapter we begin to investigate fully three-dimensional phenomena in geophysical uids using a type of model which builds on the insights obtained using the shallow water model. This is done by treating a three-dimensional uid as a stack of layers, each of con- stant density (the ocean) or constant potential temperature (the atmosphere). Equations similar to the shallow water equations apply to each layer, and the layer variable (density or potential temperature) becomes the vertical coordinate of the model. This is feasible because the requirement of convective stability requires this variable to be monotonic with geometric height, decreasing with height in the case of water density in the ocean, and increasing with height with potential temperature in the atmosphere. As long as the slope of model layers remains small compared to unity, the coordinate axes remain close enough to orthogonal to ignore the complex correction terms which otherwise appear in non-orthogonal coordinate systems. 7.1 Isopycnal model for the ocean The word isopycnal means constant density. Recall that an assumption behind the shallow water equations is that the water have uniform density. For layered models of a three- dimensional, incompressible uid, we similarly assume that each layer is of uniform density. We now see how the momentum, continuity, and hydrostatic equations appear in the context of an isopycnal model. 7.1.1 Momentum equation Recall that the horizontal (in terms of z) pressure gradient must be calculated, since it appears in the horizontal momentum equations.
    [Show full text]
  • 1050 Clicker Questions Exam 1
    Answers to Clicker Questions Chapter 1 What component of the atmosphere is most important to weather? A. Nitrogen B. Oxygen C. Carbon dioxide D. Ozone E. Water What location would have the lowest surface pressure? A. Chicago, Illinois B. Denver, Colorado C. Miami, Florida D. Dallas, Texas E. Los Angeles, California What is responsible for the distribution of surface pressure shown on the previous map? A. Temperature B. Elevation C. Weather D. Population If the relative humidity and the temperature at Denver, Colorado, compared to that at Miami, Florida, is as shown below, how much absolute water vapor is in the air between these two locations? A. Denver has more absolute water vapor B. Miami has more absolute water vapor C. Both have the same amount of water vapor Denver 10°C Air temperature 50% Relative humidity Miami 20°C Air temperature 50% Relative humidity Chapter 2 Convert our local time of 9:45am MST to UTC A. 0945 UTC B. 1545 UTC C. 1645 UTC D. 2345 UTC A weather observation made at 0400 UTC on January 10th, would correspond to what local time (MST)? A. 11:00am January10th B. 9:00pm January 10th C. 10:00pm January 9th D. 9:00pm January 9th A weather observation made at 0600 UTC on July 10th, would correspond to what local time (MDT)? A. 12:00am July 10th B. 12:00pm July 10th C. 1:00pm July 10th D. 11:00pm July 9th A rawinsonde measures all of the following variables except: Temperature Dew point temperature Precipitation Wind speed Wind direction What can a Doppler weather radar measure? Position of precipitation Intensity of precipitation Radial wind speed All of the above Only a and b In this sounding from Denver, the tropopause is located at a pressure of approximately: 700 mb 500 mb 300 mb 100 mb Which letter on this radar reflectivity image has the highest rainfall rate? A B C D C D B A Chapter 3 • Using this surface station model, what is the temperature? (Assume it’s in the US) 26 °F 26 °C 28 °F 28 °C 22.9 °F Using this surface station model, what is the current sea level pressure? A.
    [Show full text]
  • Temperature Gradient
    Temperature Gradient Derivation of dT=dr In Modern Physics it is shown that the pressure of a photon gas in thermodynamic equilib- rium (the radiation pressure PR) is given by the equation 1 P = aT 4; (1) R 3 with a the radiation constant, which is related to the Stefan-Boltzman constant, σ, and the speed of light in vacuum, c, via the equation 4σ a = = 7:565731 × 10−16 J m−3 K−4: (2) c Hence, the radiation pressure gradient is dP 4 dT R = aT 3 : (3) dr 3 dr Referring to our our discussion of opacity, we can write dF = −hκiρF; (4) dr where F = F (r) is the net outward flux (integrated over all wavelengths) of photons at a distance r from the center of the star, and hκi some properly taken average value of the opacity. The flux F is related to the luminosity through the equation L(r) F (r) = : (5) 4πr2 Considering that pressure is force per unit area, and force is a rate of change of linear momentum, and photons carry linear momentum equal to their energy divided by c, PR and F obey the equation 1 P = F (r): (6) R c Differentiation with respect to r gives dP 1 dF R = : (7) dr c dr Combining equations (3), (4), (5) and (7) then gives 1 L(r) 4 dT − hκiρ = aT 3 ; (8) c 4πr2 3 dr { 2 { which finally leads to dT 3hκiρ 1 1 = − L(r): (9) dr 16πac T 3 r2 Equation (9) gives the local (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Vortical Flows Adverse Pressure Gradient
    VORTICAL FLOWS IN AN ADVERSE PRESSURE GRADIENT by John M. Brookfield Submitted to the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 1993 © Massachusetts Institute of Technology 1993 All rights reserved Signature of Author Departrnt of Aeronautics and Astronautics May 17,1993 Certified by __ Profess~'r Edward M. Greitzer Thesis Supervisor, Director of Gas Turbine Laboratory Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics Certified by Prqse dIan A. Waitz Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics A Certified by fessor Harold Y. Wachman Chairman, partment Graduate Committee MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE SOF TFr#4PJJ nnhy 'jUN 08 1993 UBRARIES VORTICAL FLOWS IN AN ADVERSE PRESSURE GRADIENT by John M. Brookfield Submitted to the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics on May 17, 1993 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Aeronautics and Astronautics Abstract An analytical and computational study was performed to examine the effects of adverse pressure gradients on confined vortical motions representative of those encountered in compressor clearance flows. The study included exploring the parametric dependence of vortex core size and blockage, as well as designing an experimental configuration to examine this phenomena in a controlled manner. Two approaches were used to assess the flows of interest. A one-dimensional analysis was developed to evaluate the parametric dependence of vortex core expansion in a diffusing duct as a function of core to diffuser radius ratio, axial velocity ratio (core to outer flow) and swirl ratio (tangential to axial velocity at the core edge) at the inlet.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Pressure and Wind
    Air Pressure We know that standard atmospheric pressure is 14.7 pounds per square inch. We also know that air pressure decreases as we rise in the atmosphere. 1013.25 mb = 101.325 kPa = 29.92 inches Hg = 14.7 pounds per in 2 = 760 mm of Hg = 34 feet of water Air pressure can simply be measured with a barometer by measuring how the level of a liquid changes due to different weather conditions. In order that we don't have columns of liquid many feet tall, it is best to use a column of mercury, a dense liquid. The aneroid barometer measures air pressure without the use of liquid by using a partially evacuated chamber. This bellows-like chamber responds to air pressure so it can be used to measure atmospheric pressure. Air pressure records: 1084 mb in Siberia (1968) 870 mb in a Pacific Typhoon An Ideal Ga s behaves in such a way that the relationship between pressure (P), temperature (T), and volume (V) are well characterized. The equation that relates the three variables, the Ideal Gas Law , is PV = nRT with n being the number of moles of gas, and R being a constant. If we keep the mass of the gas constant, then we can simplify the equation to (PV)/T = constant. That means that: For a constant P, T increases, V increases. For a constant V, T increases, P increases. For a constant T, P increases, V decreases. Since air is a gas, it responds to changes in temperature, elevation, and latitude (owing to a non-spherical Earth).
    [Show full text]
  • Stability Analysis, Page 1 Synoptic Meteorology I
    Synoptic Meteorology I: Stability Analysis For Further Reading Most information contained within these lecture notes is drawn from Chapters 4 and 5 of “The Use of the Skew T, Log P Diagram in Analysis and Forecasting” by the Air Force Weather Agency, a PDF copy of which is available from the course website. Chapter 5 of Weather Analysis by D. Djurić provides further details about how stability may be assessed utilizing skew-T/ln-p diagrams. Why Do We Care About Stability? Simply put, we care about stability because it exerts a strong control on vertical motion – namely, ascent – and thus cloud and precipitation formation on the synoptic-scale or otherwise. We care about stability because rarely is the atmosphere ever absolutely stable or absolutely unstable, and thus we need to understand under what conditions the atmosphere is stable or unstable. We care about stability because the purpose of instability is to restore stability; atmospheric processes such as latent heat release act to consume the energy provided in the presence of instability. Before we can assess stability, however, we must first introduce a few additional concepts that we will later find beneficial, particularly when evaluating stability using skew-T diagrams. Stability-Related Concepts Convection Condensation Level The convection condensation level, or CCL, is the height or isobaric level to which an air parcel, if sufficiently heated from below, will rise adiabatically until it becomes saturated. The attribute “if sufficiently heated from below” gives rise to the convection portion of the CCL. Sufficiently strong heating of the Earth’s surface results in dry convection, which generates localized thermals that act to vertically transport energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 4: Pressure and Wind
    LectureLecture 4:4: PressurePressure andand WindWind Pressure, Measurement, Distribution Forces Affect Wind Geostrophic Balance Winds in Upper Atmosphere Near-Surface Winds Hydrostatic Balance (why the sky isn’t falling!) Thermal Wind Balance ESS55 Prof. Jin-Yi Yu WindWind isis movingmoving air.air. ESS55 Prof. Jin-Yi Yu ForceForce thatthat DeterminesDetermines WindWind Pressure gradient force Coriolis force Friction Centrifugal force ESS55 Prof. Jin-Yi Yu ThermalThermal EnergyEnergy toto KineticKinetic EnergyEnergy Pole cold H (high pressure) pressure gradient force (low pressure) Eq warm L (on a horizontal surface) ESS55 Prof. Jin-Yi Yu GlobalGlobal AtmosphericAtmospheric CirculationCirculation ModelModel ESS55 Prof. Jin-Yi Yu Sea Level Pressure (July) ESS55 Prof. Jin-Yi Yu Sea Level Pressure (January) ESS55 Prof. Jin-Yi Yu MeasurementMeasurement ofof PressurePressure Aneroid barometer (left) and its workings (right) A barograph continually records air pressure through time ESS55 Prof. Jin-Yi Yu PressurePressure GradientGradient ForceForce (from Meteorology Today) PG = (pressure difference) / distance Pressure gradient force force goes from high pressure to low pressure. Closely spaced isobars on a weather map indicate steep pressure gradient. ESS55 Prof. Jin-Yi Yu ThermalThermal EnergyEnergy toto KineticKinetic EnergyEnergy Pole cold H (high pressure) pressure gradient force (low pressure) Eq warm L (on a horizontal surface) ESS55 Prof. Jin-Yi Yu Upper Troposphere (free atmosphere) e c n a l a b c i Surface h --Yi Yu p o r ESS55 t Prof. Jin s o e BalanceBalance ofof ForceForce inin thetheg HorizontalHorizontal ) geostrophic balance plus frictional force Weather & Climate (high pressure)pressure gradient force H (from (low pressure) L Can happen in the tropics where the Coriolis force is small.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY
    Chapter 4 ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY Wildfires are greatly affected by atmospheric motion and the properties of the atmosphere that affect its motion. Most commonly considered in evaluating fire danger are surface winds with their attendant temperatures and humidities, as experienced in everyday living. Less obvious, but equally important, are vertical motions that influence wildfire in many ways. Atmospheric stability may either encourage or suppress vertical air motion. The heat of fire itself generates vertical motion, at least near the surface, but the convective circulation thus established is affected directly by the stability of the air. In turn, the indraft into the fire at low levels is affected, and this has a marked effect on fire intensity. Also, in many indirect ways, atmospheric stability will affect fire behavior. For example, winds tend to be turbulent and gusty when the atmosphere is unstable, and this type of airflow causes fires to behave erratically. Thunderstorms with strong updrafts and downdrafts develop when the atmosphere is unstable and contains sufficient moisture. Their lightning may set wildfires, and their distinctive winds can have adverse effects on fire behavior. Subsidence occurs in larger scale vertical circulation as air from high-pressure areas replaces that carried aloft in adjacent low-pressure systems. This often brings very dry air from high altitudes to low levels. If this reaches the surface, going wildfires tend to burn briskly, often as briskly at night as during the day. From these few examples, we can see that atmospheric stability is closely related to fire behavior, and that a general understanding of stability and its effects is necessary to the successful interpretation of fire-behavior phenomena.
    [Show full text]
  • Pressure Gradient Effect in Natural Convection Boundary Layers
    boundary layer problem dependent on the downstream different powers, to show the difference with the heat flux conditions. This has been long recognized for the outward obtained when the pressure gradient is neglected. The ev­ bound flow below a horizontal heated surface, for which olution of small perturbations superposed on the stationary even approximate integral methods require a boundary flow is discussed, pointing out that upstream propagation condition at the edge of the surface, in addition to a regu­ is possible in the region of interest but the speed of the larity condition at the center. A variety of conditions at the upstream propagating waves decreases as the component of edge has been proposed. Wagner10 assumed that the buoyancy tangential to the solid surface begins to dominate boundary layer thickness is zero there, which is appropri­ the flow, or as the edge of the surface is approached. Spe­ ate only for the flow above a heated surface; Singh and cial attention is given to the flow under very flat surfaces, Birkebak11 adjusted the movable singularity appearing in for which the effect of the tangential buoyancy force the equations of their integral method to make it coincide changes from negligible to dominant within a very short with the edge; Clifton and Chapman12 used an adaptation distance. The analysis of this case demonstrates the tran­ of the idea of critical conditions from open channel hy­ sition from the flow below a curved body to that below a draulics. The structure of the boundary layer near the edge finite horizontal flat plate. has been analyzed elsewhere,13 showing that the boundary layer solution develops a singularity at the edge, where the II.
    [Show full text]