DOCSLIB.ORG

Introduction to Geometric Group Theory

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Introduction to Geometric Group Theory Math 697: Introduction to Geometric Group Theory Notes from course given by Dick Canary, Fall 2014. August 23, 2016 0 Overview 0.1 A Rambling Geometric group theory is really \a collection of things put together by a state of mind." These things defi- nitely include hyperbolic group theory, but also various other things such as CAT(0) groups, topological group theory, and so on ... A little more concretely, geometric group theory is the study of groups by looking at their actions on spaces. Given a [finitely-presented] group G = hx1; : : : ; xn j r1; : : : ; rmi, we can define the word metric distance by setting d(g; h) to be the minimal length of word in fx1; : : : ; xng (and their inverses) over all representations −1 of g h. We define the Cayley graph ΓG of G by taking the vertices to be the elements of G and drawing edges labelled xi joining each g to gxi ∼ Example 0.1. • If G = Z = ha ji, then ΓG is a line (= R.) a a a a ··· ··· a−2 a−1 1 a a2 2 • If G = Z = ha; b j [a:b]i, then ΓG is a 2-dimensional lattice (\what is this? It is graph paper.") ab = ba b 0 a 1 1 • If G = F2 = ha; b ji, then ΓG is an infinite 4-valent tree (the universal cover of S _ S )|see below If M is a compact manifold, then π1(M) acts properly discontinuously and co-compactly on M~ . 2 2 Example 0.2. If M = T , then π1(M) = Z , which acts properly discontinuously and cocompactly on M~ = R2; we note that R2 \looks like" Z2 (coarsely speaking.) ~ If M is a compact 3-manifold (e.g. a solid genus-2 torus), M is a thickening of ΓF2 , the infinite 4-valent tree. We make precise the notion of \looks like" by using the notion of quasi-isometry. Note that our spaces X and Y are usually assumed to be proper (i.e. closed balls are compact) and geodesic (i.e. distance between two points is given by the length of a shortest path.) 1 a−1 ba b a−1 ba−1 a ba b−1 b−1 a−1 ba a−1 ba b b b a−1 ba−1 a−1 a a ba b−1 b−1 b−1 b−1 a−1 ba a−1 a a−1 a a−1 ba b−1 b−1 b b a−1 ba−1 a ba a−1 ba−1 a ba b b−1 b−1 b−1 b−1 a−1 ba a−1 ba b b b b a−1 ba−1 a−1 a−1 a a a ba b−1 b−1 b−1 b−1 a−1 a a−1 a b−1 b−1 b−1 b−1 a−1 ba−1 a ba a−1 ba−1 a ba b−1 b−1 b−1 b−1 b−1 b−1 b−1 a−1 a a−1 ba a−1 ba a−1 a b−1 b−1 b b a−1 ba−1 a−1 a a ba b−1 b−1 b−1 b−1 a−1 a a−1 a b−1 b−1 b−1 a−1 ba−1 a ba b−1 b−1 b−1 a−1 a b−1 Figure 1: Part of a Cayley graph of a nonabelian free group 1 Definition 0.3. h : X ! Y is a quasi-isometric embedding if there exist k; c s.t. k d(x; z) − c ≤ d (h(x); h(z)) ≤ kd(x; z) + c for all x; z 2 X. h is a quasi-isometry if in addition it is \coarsely surjective", i.e. there exists D ≥ 0 s.t. for all y 2 Y , there exists x 2 X s.t. d(h(x); y) ≤ D.1 A key result in geometric group theory is the Milnor-Svarcˇ lemma, which states that if G acts properly discontinuously and co-compactly on a space X, then X is quasi-isometric to G with the word metric. Note that this notion of quasi-isometry, though seemingly loose and geometric, can capture algebraic aspects of structure (or aspects of algebraic structure.) e.g. G quasi-isometric to a free group implies G virtually free.2 There is also Gromov's theorem, which states that any group with polynomial growth is virtually nilpotent. In fact, we can also use algebra to clarify geometry, as in the following [re-]formulation of hyperbolic 1Think of the plane, and graph paper. 2\Virtually" or \almost" in this context means true up to (true for a) finite-index subgroup. These adjectives will appear a lot, because quasi-isometry fails to distinguish between the whole group and finite-index subgroups. 2 spaces by Gromov: Fact. Suppose X is simply-connected with (sectional) curvature ≤ −k < 0. Then there exists δ = δ(k) such that any geodesic triangle in X is δ-slim, meaning that if T has vertices x; y; z, then [x; z] ⊂ Nδ([x; y][[y; z]), i.e. 8t 2 [x; z]: 9s 2 [x; y] [ [y; z] s.t. d(s; t) < δ. Definition 0.4 (Gromov, possibly Alexander). X is δ-hyperbolic if every geodesic triangle in X is δ-slim. e.g. trees are 0-hyperbolic. A space is hyperbolic if it is δ-hyperbolic for some δ ≥ 0. A group is hyperbolic if it acts properly discontinuously and co-compactly on a hyperbolic space. Hyperbolic groups have some very nice properties: • Hyperbolic groups have solvable word problem (which we might formulate as \can I build the Cayley graph [algorithmically]?") by Dehn's algorithm. • They also have solvable conjugacy problem and isomorphism problem.3 • The Tits Alternative: if a hyperbolic group G is not virtually cyclic, it contains a F2. • A hyperbolic group cannot contain a copy of Z2. • A hyperbolic group has only finitely many conjugacy classzes of finite subgroups. • Being a hyperbolic space / group is a condition invariant under quasi-isometry. Hyperbolic spaces are those with constant negative curvature (-1); we can generalize this notion to look at spaces X with constant non-positive curvature, and this brings us to the theory of CAT(0) groups: Definition 0.5. A simply-connected space X is CAT(0) if every geodesic triangle in X is at least as thin as a Euclidean triangle with the same edge lengths. G is CAT(0) if it acts properly and cocompactly on a CAT(0) space. Definition 0.6. CAT(0) cube complexes are formed by gluing Euclidean unit cubes along faces. e.g. R2 is a CAT(0) cube complex Example 0.7. Right-Angled Artin Groups (RAAGs) are CAT(0) groups AΓ formed as follows: start with a finite graph Γ; define (0) (1) AΓ = hΓ j vw = wv () (v; w) ⊂ Γ i i.e. the elements of AΓ are the vertices of Γ, and we add a commutator relation between two elements iff there is an edge between the corresponding vertices. e.g. if Γ is the empty graph on n vertices, then AΓ = Fn. n If Γ = Kn, then AΓ = Z . 2 2 If Γ consists of two disjoint edges on 4 vertices, then AΓ = Z ∗ Z . These groups are \interpolating between the free group and the free abelian group." Theorem 0.8 (Agol, Wise). If a hyperbolic group G acts properly discontinuously and cocompactly on a CAT(0) cube complex (in this case we say G is a cubulation), then a finite-index subgroup of G embeds in a RAAG. Theorem 0.9 (Haglund-Wise, Kahn-Markovic). If M is a closed hyperbolic 3-manifold, then M is cubulated. Finally, there is topological group theory. The prototypical result here is the proposition that states that every subgroup of a free group is free, proven using covering spaces. There is also the following generalisation of this: Theorem 0.10 (Kurosh). If G = G1 ∗ G2 and H ⊂ G, then H = F ∗λ2Λ Hλ, where F is free, and each HΛ is conjugate to a a subgroup of G1 or G2. (See Figure 2.) 3Something involving Tietze transformations was name-dropped here. 3 Figure 2: A free product may be thought of as the fundamental group of a wedge of spaces. This has the following corollary: Corollary. If G is finitely-generated, then G has a unique free decomposition G = G1 ∗ · · · ∗ Gn where each Gi is freely indecomposable (i.e. does not split as a free product.) Other topics that might come under this last heading include JSJ decompositions and Bass-Serre theory. 0.2 Definitions and quasi-isometry Definition 0.11. Given X a metric space and α : [0; 1] ! X a path, n−1 X `X (α) := sup d(α(ti); α(ti+1)) 0=t <t <···<t =1 0 1 n i=0 Definition 0.12. α is rectifiable if `X (α) < 1. Definition 0.13. α is geodesic if `X (α) = d(α(0); α(1)). Exercise. (1) A subpath of a geodesic is a geodesic, (2) If 0 ≤ s ≤ t ≤ u ≤ 1, then d(α(s); α(t)) + d(α(t); α(u)) = d(α(s); α(u)) if α is a geodesic. Definition 0.14. A metric space is geodesic if any two points are joined by a (by some) geodesic. e.g. Cayley graphs, Riemannian manifolds, curve complexes, etc. Definition 0.15. X is proper if all closed metric balls are compact. Our spaces will be proper geodesic metric spaces (mostly.) We always assume that G acts by isometries on X, i.e.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hyperbolic Manifolds: an Introduction in 2 and 3 Dimensions Albert Marden Frontmatter More Information
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-11674-0 - Hyperbolic Manifolds: An Introduction in 2 and 3 Dimensions Albert Marden Frontmatter More information HYPERBOLIC MANIFOLDS An Introduction in 2 and 3 Dimensions Over the past three decades there has been a total revolution in the classic branch of mathematics called 3-dimensional topology, namely the discovery that most solid 3-dimensional shapes are hyperbolic 3-manifolds. This book introduces and explains hyperbolic geometry and hyperbolic 3- and 2-dimensional manifolds in the first two chapters, and then goes on to develop the subject. The author discusses the profound discoveries of the astonishing features of these 3-manifolds, helping the reader to understand them without going into long, detailed formal proofs. The book is heav- ily illustrated with pictures, mostly in color, that help explain the manifold properties described in the text. Each chapter ends with a set of Exercises and Explorations that both challenge the reader to prove assertions made in the text, and suggest fur- ther topics to explore that bring additional insight. There is an extensive index and bibliography. © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-11674-0 - Hyperbolic Manifolds: An Introduction in 2 and 3 Dimensions Albert Marden Frontmatter More information [Thurston’s Jewel (JB)(DD)] Thurston’s Jewel: Illustrated is the convex hull of the limit set of a kleinian group G associated with a hyperbolic manifold M(G) with a single, incompressible boundary component. The translucent convex hull is pictured lying over p. 8.43 of Thurston [1979a] where the theory behind the construction of such convex hulls was first formulated.
    [Show full text]
  • Filling Functions Notes for an Advanced Course on the Geometry of the Word Problem for Finitely Generated Groups Centre De Recer
    Filling Functions Notes for an advanced course on The Geometry of the Word Problem for Finitely Generated Groups Centre de Recerca Mathematica` Barcelona T.R.Riley July 2005 Revised February 2006 Contents Notation vi 1Introduction 1 2Fillingfunctions 5 2.1 Van Kampen diagrams . 5 2.2 Filling functions via van Kampen diagrams . .... 6 2.3 Example: combable groups . 10 2.4 Filling functions interpreted algebraically . ......... 15 2.5 Filling functions interpreted computationally . ......... 16 2.6 Filling functions for Riemannian manifolds . ...... 21 2.7 Quasi-isometry invariance . .22 3Relationshipsbetweenfillingfunctions 25 3.1 The Double Exponential Theorem . 26 3.2 Filling length and duality of spanning trees in planar graphs . 31 3.3 Extrinsic diameter versus intrinsic diameter . ........ 35 3.4 Free filling length . 35 4Example:nilpotentgroups 39 4.1 The Dehn and filling length functions . .. 39 4.2 Open questions . 42 5Asymptoticcones 45 5.1 The definition . 45 5.2 Hyperbolic groups . 47 5.3 Groups with simply connected asymptotic cones . ...... 53 5.4 Higher dimensions . 57 Bibliography 68 v Notation f, g :[0, ∞) → [0, ∞)satisfy f ≼ g when there exists C > 0 such that f (n) ≤ Cg(Cn+ C) + Cn+ C for all n,satisfy f ≽ g ≼, ≽, ≃ when g ≼ f ,andsatisfy f ≃ g when f ≼ g and g ≼ f .These relations are extended to functions f : N → N by considering such f to be constant on the intervals [n, n + 1). ab, a−b,[a, b] b−1ab, b−1a−1b, a−1b−1ab Cay1(G, X) the Cayley graph of G with respect to a generating set X Cay2(P) the Cayley 2-complex of a
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief Survey of the Deformation Theory of Kleinian Groups 1
    ISSN 1464-8997 (on line) 1464-8989 (printed) 23 Geometry & Topology Monographs Volume 1: The Epstein birthday schrift Pages 23–49 A brief survey of the deformation theory of Kleinian groups James W Anderson Abstract We give a brief overview of the current state of the study of the deformation theory of Kleinian groups. The topics covered include the definition of the deformation space of a Kleinian group and of several im- portant subspaces; a discussion of the parametrization by topological data of the components of the closure of the deformation space; the relationship between algebraic and geometric limits of sequences of Kleinian groups; and the behavior of several geometrically and analytically interesting functions on the deformation space. AMS Classification 30F40; 57M50 Keywords Kleinian group, deformation space, hyperbolic manifold, alge- braic limits, geometric limits, strong limits Dedicated to David Epstein on the occasion of his 60th birthday 1 Introduction Kleinian groups, which are the discrete groups of orientation preserving isome- tries of hyperbolic space, have been studied for a number of years, and have been of particular interest since the work of Thurston in the late 1970s on the geometrization of compact 3–manifolds. A Kleinian group can be viewed either as an isolated, single group, or as one of a member of a family or continuum of groups. In this note, we concentrate our attention on the latter scenario, which is the deformation theory of the title, and attempt to give a description of various of the more common families of Kleinian groups which are considered when doing deformation theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Combinatorial Group Theory
    Combinatorial Group Theory Charles F. Miller III March 5, 2002 Abstract These notes were prepared for use by the participants in the Workshop on Algebra, Geometry and Topology held at the Australian National University, 22 January to 9 February, 1996. They have subsequently been updated for use by students in the subject 620-421 Combinatorial Group Theory at the University of Melbourne. Copyright 1996-2002 by C. F. Miller. Contents 1 Free groups and presentations 3 1.1 Free groups . 3 1.2 Presentations by generators and relations . 7 1.3 Dehn’s fundamental problems . 9 1.4 Homomorphisms . 10 1.5 Presentations and fundamental groups . 12 1.6 Tietze transformations . 14 1.7 Extraction principles . 15 2 Construction of new groups 17 2.1 Direct products . 17 2.2 Free products . 19 2.3 Free products with amalgamation . 21 2.4 HNN extensions . 24 3 Properties, embeddings and examples 27 3.1 Countable groups embed in 2-generator groups . 27 3.2 Non-finite presentability of subgroups . 29 3.3 Hopfian and residually finite groups . 31 4 Subgroup Theory 35 4.1 Subgroups of Free Groups . 35 4.1.1 The general case . 35 4.1.2 Finitely generated subgroups of free groups . 35 4.2 Subgroups of presented groups . 41 4.3 Subgroups of free products . 43 4.4 Groups acting on trees . 44 5 Decision Problems 45 5.1 The word and conjugacy problems . 45 5.2 Higman’s embedding theorem . 51 1 5.3 The isomorphism problem and recognizing properties . 52 2 Chapter 1 Free groups and presentations In introductory courses on abstract algebra one is likely to encounter the dihedral group D3 consisting of the rigid motions of an equilateral triangle onto itself.
    [Show full text]
  • WHAT IS Outer Space?
    WHAT IS Outer Space? Karen Vogtmann To investigate the properties of a group G, it is with a metric of constant negative curvature, and often useful to realize G as a group of symmetries g : S ! X is a homeomorphism, called the mark- of some geometric object. For example, the clas- ing, which is well-defined up to isotopy. From this sical modular group P SL(2; Z) can be thought of point of view, the mapping class group (which as a group of isometries of the upper half-plane can be identified with Out(π1(S))) acts on (X; g) f(x; y) 2 R2j y > 0g equipped with the hyper- by composing the marking with a homeomor- bolic metric ds2 = (dx2 + dy2)=y2. The study of phism of S { the hyperbolic metric on X does P SL(2; Z) and its subgroups via this action has not change. By deforming the metric on X, on occupied legions of mathematicians for well over the other hand, we obtain a neighborhood of the a century. point (X; g) in Teichm¨uller space. We are interested here in the (outer) automor- phism group of a finitely-generated free group. u v Although free groups are the simplest and most fundamental class of infinite groups, their auto- u v u v u u morphism groups are remarkably complex, and v x w v many natural questions about them remain unan- w w swered. We will describe a geometric object On known as Outer space , which was introduced in w w u v [2] to study Out(Fn).
    [Show full text]
  • Lectures on Quasi-Isometric Rigidity Michael Kapovich 1 Lectures on Quasi-Isometric Rigidity 3 Introduction: What Is Geometric Group Theory? 3 Lecture 1
    Contents Lectures on quasi-isometric rigidity Michael Kapovich 1 Lectures on quasi-isometric rigidity 3 Introduction: What is Geometric Group Theory? 3 Lecture 1. Groups and Spaces 5 1. Cayley graphs and other metric spaces 5 2. Quasi-isometries 6 3. Virtual isomorphisms and QI rigidity problem 9 4. Examples and non-examples of QI rigidity 10 Lecture 2. Ultralimits and Morse Lemma 13 1. Ultralimits of sequences in topological spaces. 13 2. Ultralimits of sequences of metric spaces 14 3. Ultralimits and CAT(0) metric spaces 14 4. Asymptotic Cones 15 5. Quasi-isometries and asymptotic cones 15 6. Morse Lemma 16 Lecture 3. Boundary extension and quasi-conformal maps 19 1. Boundary extension of QI maps of hyperbolic spaces 19 2. Quasi-actions 20 3. Conical limit points of quasi-actions 21 4. Quasiconformality of the boundary extension 21 Lecture 4. Quasiconformal groups and Tukia's rigidity theorem 27 1. Quasiconformal groups 27 2. Invariant measurable conformal structure for qc groups 28 3. Proof of Tukia's theorem 29 4. QI rigidity for surface groups 31 Lecture 5. Appendix 33 1. Appendix 1: Hyperbolic space 33 2. Appendix 2: Least volume ellipsoids 35 3. Appendix 3: Different measures of quasiconformality 35 Bibliography 37 i Lectures on quasi-isometric rigidity Michael Kapovich IAS/Park City Mathematics Series Volume XX, XXXX Lectures on quasi-isometric rigidity Michael Kapovich Introduction: What is Geometric Group Theory? Historically (in the 19th century), groups appeared as automorphism groups of some structures: • Polynomials (field extensions) | Galois groups. • Vector spaces, possibly equipped with a bilinear form| Matrix groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Automorphism Groups of Free Groups, Surface Groups and Free Abelian Groups
    Automorphism groups of free groups, surface groups and free abelian groups Martin R. Bridson and Karen Vogtmann The group of 2 × 2 matrices with integer entries and determinant ±1 can be identified either with the group of outer automorphisms of a rank two free group or with the group of isotopy classes of homeomorphisms of a 2-dimensional torus. Thus this group is the beginning of three natural sequences of groups, namely the general linear groups GL(n, Z), the groups Out(Fn) of outer automorphisms of free groups of rank n ≥ 2, and the map- ± ping class groups Mod (Sg) of orientable surfaces of genus g ≥ 1. Much of the work on mapping class groups and automorphisms of free groups is motivated by the idea that these sequences of groups are strongly analogous, and should have many properties in common. This program is occasionally derailed by uncooperative facts but has in general proved to be a success- ful strategy, leading to fundamental discoveries about the structure of these groups. In this article we will highlight a few of the most striking similar- ities and differences between these series of groups and present some open problems motivated by this philosophy. ± Similarities among the groups Out(Fn), GL(n, Z) and Mod (Sg) begin with the fact that these are the outer automorphism groups of the most prim- itive types of torsion-free discrete groups, namely free groups, free abelian groups and the fundamental groups of closed orientable surfaces π1Sg. In the ± case of Out(Fn) and GL(n, Z) this is obvious, in the case of Mod (Sg) it is a classical theorem of Nielsen.
    [Show full text]
  • 3-Manifold Groups
    3-Manifold Groups Matthias Aschenbrenner Stefan Friedl Henry Wilton University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA E-mail address: [email protected] Fakultat¨ fur¨ Mathematik, Universitat¨ Regensburg, Germany E-mail address: [email protected] Department of Pure Mathematics and Mathematical Statistics, Cam- bridge University, United Kingdom E-mail address: [email protected] Abstract. We summarize properties of 3-manifold groups, with a particular focus on the consequences of the recent results of Ian Agol, Jeremy Kahn, Vladimir Markovic and Dani Wise. Contents Introduction 1 Chapter 1. Decomposition Theorems 7 1.1. Topological and smooth 3-manifolds 7 1.2. The Prime Decomposition Theorem 8 1.3. The Loop Theorem and the Sphere Theorem 9 1.4. Preliminary observations about 3-manifold groups 10 1.5. Seifert fibered manifolds 11 1.6. The JSJ-Decomposition Theorem 14 1.7. The Geometrization Theorem 16 1.8. Geometric 3-manifolds 20 1.9. The Geometric Decomposition Theorem 21 1.10. The Geometrization Theorem for fibered 3-manifolds 24 1.11. 3-manifolds with (virtually) solvable fundamental group 26 Chapter 2. The Classification of 3-Manifolds by their Fundamental Groups 29 2.1. Closed 3-manifolds and fundamental groups 29 2.2. Peripheral structures and 3-manifolds with boundary 31 2.3. Submanifolds and subgroups 32 2.4. Properties of 3-manifolds and their fundamental groups 32 2.5. Centralizers 35 Chapter 3. 3-manifold groups after Geometrization 41 3.1. Definitions and conventions 42 3.2. Justifications 45 3.3. Additional results and implications 59 Chapter 4. The Work of Agol, Kahn{Markovic, and Wise 63 4.1.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Dehn Functions of K\" Ahler Groups
    ON THE DEHN FUNCTIONS OF KAHLER¨ GROUPS CLAUDIO LLOSA ISENRICH AND ROMAIN TESSERA Abstract. We address the problem of which functions can arise as Dehn functions of K¨ahler groups. We explain why there are examples of K¨ahler groups with linear, quadratic, and exponential Dehn function. We then proceed to show that there is an example of a K¨ahler group which has Dehn function bounded below by a cubic function 6 and above by n . As a consequence we obtain that for a compact K¨ahler manifold having non-positive holomorphic bisectional curvature does not imply having quadratic Dehn function. 1. Introduction A K¨ahler group is a group which can be realized as fundamental group of a compact K¨ahler manifold. K¨ahler groups form an intriguing class of groups. A fundamental problem in the field is Serre’s question of “which” finitely presented groups are K¨ahler. While on one side there is a variety of constraints on K¨ahler groups, many of them originating in Hodge theory and, more generally, the theory of harmonic maps on K¨ahler manifolds, examples have been constructed that show that the class is far from trivial. Filling the space between examples and constraints turns out to be a very hard problem. This is at least in part due to the fact that the range of known concrete examples and construction techniques are limited. For general background on K¨ahler groups see [2] (and also [13, 4] for more recent results). Known constructions have shown that K¨ahler groups can present the following group theoretic properties: they can ● be non-residually finite [50] (see also [18]); ● be nilpotent of class 2 [14, 47]; ● admit a classifying space with finite k-skeleton, but no classifying space with finitely many k + 1-cells [23] (see also [5, 38, 12]); and arXiv:1807.03677v2 [math.GT] 7 Jun 2019 ● be non-coherent [33] (also [45, 27]).
    [Show full text]
  • Hyperbolic Geometry
    Flavors of Geometry MSRI Publications Volume 31,1997 Hyperbolic Geometry JAMES W. CANNON, WILLIAM J. FLOYD, RICHARD KENYON, AND WALTER R. PARRY Contents 1. Introduction 59 2. The Origins of Hyperbolic Geometry 60 3. Why Call it Hyperbolic Geometry? 63 4. Understanding the One-Dimensional Case 65 5. Generalizing to Higher Dimensions 67 6. Rudiments of Riemannian Geometry 68 7. Five Models of Hyperbolic Space 69 8. Stereographic Projection 72 9. Geodesics 77 10. Isometries and Distances in the Hyperboloid Model 80 11. The Space at Infinity 84 12. The Geometric Classification of Isometries 84 13. Curious Facts about Hyperbolic Space 86 14. The Sixth Model 95 15. Why Study Hyperbolic Geometry? 98 16. When Does a Manifold Have a Hyperbolic Structure? 103 17. How to Get Analytic Coordinates at Infinity? 106 References 108 Index 110 1. Introduction Hyperbolic geometry was created in the first half of the nineteenth century in the midst of attempts to understand Euclid’s axiomatic basis for geometry. It is one type of non-Euclidean geometry, that is, a geometry that discards one of Euclid’s axioms. Einstein and Minkowski found in non-Euclidean geometry a This work was supported in part by The Geometry Center, University of Minnesota, an STC funded by NSF, DOE, and Minnesota Technology, Inc., by the Mathematical Sciences Research Institute, and by NSF research grants. 59 60 J. W. CANNON, W. J. FLOYD, R. KENYON, AND W. R. PARRY geometric basis for the understanding of physical time and space. In the early part of the twentieth century every serious student of mathematics and physics studied non-Euclidean geometry.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    Curriculum vitae Kate VOKES Adresse E-mail [email protected] Institut des Hautes Études Scientifiques 35 route de Chartres 91440 Bures-sur-Yvette Site Internet www.ihes.fr/~vokes/ France Postes occupées • octobre 2020–juin 2021: Postdoctorante (HUAWEI Young Talents Programme), Institut des Hautes Études Scientifiques, Université Paris-Saclay, France • janvier 2019–octobre 2020: Postdoctorante, Institut des Hautes Études Scien- tifiques, Université Paris-Saclay, France • juillet 2018–decembre 2018: Fields Postdoctoral Fellow, Thematic Program on Teichmüller Theory and its Connections to Geometry, Topology and Dynamics, Fields Institute for Research in Mathematical Sciences, Toronto, Canada Formation • octobre 2014 – juin 2018: Thèse de Mathématiques University of Warwick, Royaume-Uni Titre de thèse: Large scale geometry of curve complexes Directeur de thèse: Brian Bowditch • octobre 2010 – juillet 2014: MMath(≈Licence+M1) en Mathématiques Durham University, Royaume-Uni, Class I (Hons) Domaine de recherche Topologie de basse dimension et géométrie des groupes, en particulier le groupe mod- ulaire d’une surface, l’espace de Teichmüller, le complexe des courbes et des complexes similaires. Publications et prépublications • (avec Jacob Russell) Thickness and relative hyperbolicity for graphs of multicurves, prépublication (2020) : arXiv:2010.06464 • (avec Jacob Russell) The (non)-relative hyperbolicity of the separating curve graph, prépublication (2019) : arXiv:1910.01051 • Hierarchical hyperbolicity of graphs of multicurves, accepté dans Algebr.
    [Show full text]
  • On Dehn Functions and Products of Groups
    TRANSACTIONSof the AMERICANMATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 335, Number 1, January 1993 ON DEHN FUNCTIONS AND PRODUCTS OF GROUPS STEPHEN G. BRICK Abstract. If G is a finitely presented group then its Dehn function—or its isoperimetric inequality—is of interest. For example, G satisfies a linear isoperi- metric inequality iff G is negatively curved (or hyperbolic in the sense of Gro- mov). Also, if G possesses an automatic structure then G satisfies a quadratic isoperimetric inequality. We investigate the effect of certain natural operations on the Dehn function. We consider direct products, taking subgroups of finite index, free products, amalgamations, and HNN extensions. 0. Introduction The study of isoperimetric inequalities for finitely presented groups can be approached in two different ways. There is the geometric approach (see [Gr]). Given a finitely presented group G, choose a compact Riemannian manifold M with fundamental group being G. Then consider embedded circles which bound disks in M, and search for a relationship between the length of the circle and the area of a minimal spanning disk. One can then triangulate M and take simplicial approximations, resulting in immersed disks. What was their area then becomes the number of two-cells in the image of the immersion counted with multiplicity. We are thus led to a combinatorial approach to the isoperimetric inequality (also see [Ge and CEHLPT]). We start by defining the Dehn function of a finite two-complex. Let K be a finite two-complex. If w is a circuit in K^, null-homotopic in K, then there is a Van Kampen diagram for w , i.e.
    [Show full text]