A Competitive Interstate Rail Freight and Passenger Network

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Competitive Interstate Rail Freight and Passenger Network University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Engineering and Information Faculty of Engineering and Information Sciences - Papers: Part A Sciences 1-1-2014 A competitive interstate rail freight and passenger network Philip Laird University of Wollongong, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/eispapers Part of the Engineering Commons, and the Science and Technology Studies Commons Recommended Citation Laird, Philip, "A competitive interstate rail freight and passenger network" (2014). Faculty of Engineering and Information Sciences - Papers: Part A. 2724. https://ro.uow.edu.au/eispapers/2724 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] A competitive interstate rail freight and passenger network Abstract An outline is given of the East - West rail corridor linking Melbourne, Adelaide and Perth, and the North - South corridor between Melbourne, Sydney and Brisbane. The competitiveness of freight services on the North - South corridor is limited due to 'steam age' alignment and low clearances. Both corridors have lower axle loads and restricted train lengths when compared with mainlines of the two Canadian Class I railroads. The Brisbane Cairns corridor is cited as an example of where rail deviations completed during the 1990s have allowed for faster and heavier freight trains and the effective introduction of tilt trains. Proposals for an inland railway are also noted along with the impact on rail of the reconstruction of the Hume and Pacific Highways. Continuing to improve rail’s share of land freight on the East West corridor (now over 80 per cent) and lifting the low shares on the North - South corridor (lower than 10 per cent on the shorter corridors) would deliver substantial savings in diesel use along with reductions of greenhouse gas emissions, and result in appreciably lower external costs. Keywords freight, network, rail, passenger, interstate, competitive Disciplines Engineering | Science and Technology Studies Publication Details Laird, P. (2014). A competitive interstate rail freight and passenger network. Conference on Railway Excellence, Proceedings (pp. 121-130). Australia: Railway Technical Society of Australasia (RTSA). This conference paper is available at Research Online: https://ro.uow.edu.au/eispapers/2724 A COMPETITIVE INTERSTATE RAIL FREIGHT AND PASSENGER NETWORK Philip Laird MSc (VUW and ANU), PhD (Calgary), FCILT, Comp IE Aust University of Wollongong SUMMARY An outline is given of the East - West rail corridor linking Melbourne, Adelaide and Perth, and the North South corridor between Melbourne, Sydney and Brisbane. The competitiveness of freight services on the North South corridor is limited due to 'steam age' alignment and low clearances. Both corridors have lower axle loads and restricted train lengths when compared with mainlines of the two Canadian Class I railroads. The Brisbane Cairns corridor is cited as an example of where rail deviations completed during the 1990s have allowed for faster and heavier freight trains and the effective introduction of tilt trains. Proposals for an inland railway are also noted along with the impact on rail of the reconstruction of the Hume and Pacific Highways. Continuing to improve rails share of land freight on the East West corridor (now over 80 per cent) and lifting the low shares on the North - South corridor (lower than 10 per cent on the shorter corridors) would deliver substantial savings in diesel use along with reductions of greenhouse gas emissions, and result in appreciably lower external costs. INTRODUCTION corresponds to 31.9 TAL can move on some track at speeds of up to 129 km/h (80 mph). This paper shall be mainly concerned with the Double stacking of containers is also standard. East-West rail corridor linking Melbourne, Adelaide and Perth, and the North-South The lengths of crossing loops on the East- corridor between Melbourne, Sydney and West and North-South corridors is a further Brisbane. Brief comment is given on proposals issue. Here, the current limit is 1800 metres for an Inland Railway and other issues such as (and in some cases 1500 m; with the exception 'highway subsidization'. of 'passing lanes' between Junee and Melbourne). This length does not compare well Most of the interstate mainlines are now under with that of crossing loops on the mainlines in the control of the Australian Rail Track Canada with 10,000 feet (3000 m) and Corporation (ARTC) and allow the operation of increasingly 12,000 feet (3600 m). In addition, freight trains with a 23 Tonnes Axle Load Western Canada has had two transcontinental (TAL) at speeds up to 80 km/h, or with a 21 routes since 1920 whereas Eastern Australia TAL at speeds up to 115 km/h. In addition, has just one such route. freight train speeds on most of the North-South corridor, and the Adelaide Hills section of the It is of note that axle loads of up to 40 TAL are East-West corridor are constrained by track used in the iron ore railways of the Pilbara laid down in the 'steam age' with excessive region of Western Australia, whilst the Hunter tight radius curvature. There are also Valley track in New South Wales (NSW - constraints on the moving of trains with double managed by ARTC) has 30 TAL. stacked containers on interstate tracks to west of Adelaide and Parkes. SETTING THE SCENE Such speed-weight and load flexibility A central finding of a 1989 Parliamentary conditions fall far short of the standards that Committee [1] examining rail was that:"...The apply to the mainlines of Canadian and United plain fact is that a greatly increased amount of States Class I railroads. Here wagons at freight could be carried across the continent by 286,000 pounds gross weight, which rail more efficiently and with greater safety Philip Laird A competitive interstate rail and passenger freight network University of Wollongong than it ever could be by road. ... If rail were and Territory Governments) agreed to adopt more efficient and carried the amount of freight certain measures to make [4] "...dramatic it should, lives would be saved, less non- improvements in the performance of interstate renewable resources would be used and less rail" in order to overcome a situation where pollution would be generated......Australia is rail has "...failed to compete effectively with paying the price of neglect and bandaid road transport" and rail "...has not realised its solutions in an endeavour to solve problems in potential contribution to the national economy" its rail systems. ... Rail has been starved of funds and rendered inefficient. " The measures, which were supported by the findings of the NTPT, included average speeds Although some progress has been made on for freight trains with 21 tonne axle loads TAL the past 25 years on further improving the per hour as a five year goal, and 100 km per efficiency of rail (including management and hour as a 'longer term' goal. work practices), the gains have been mixed. On the one hand, the East West corridor has In addition, the scope of works for been significantly improved and rail now wins implementing the NTPT goals, including some over 80 per cent of the interstate land freight in track realignment, were endorsed by a House and out of Perth. of Representatives Committee [5]. The thrust of the Committee's report was that the existing On the other hand, on the North South corridor mainline interstate track was in urgent need of linking Australia’s three largest cities, rails upgrading, with an investment of $1 bn over share of land freight has been going the next three years, and after 2001, a further backwards since 1989. More detail on this is $2 bn. given later. However, the ATC agreed measure of lifting In 1992, as a result of an inter-governmental the average speed of freight trains with 21 TAL agreement, a National Rail Corporation was to 80 km/h has proved elusive. In 1998, formed to move interstate freight. Detailed average actual speeds for intermodal trains on studies since 1992 addressing the interstate all sectors of track [6], ranged from 48 km/h network include those of National Transport (Brisbane Sydney due to excessive 'dwell' Planning Task Force (NTPT) [2] and in 2001, a time of five hours) to some 70 km/h. Track Audit [3] for the ARTC. Both studies included proposals to improve the efficiency of The average speeds reflect transit times, and the interstate rail network and included the for rail to be competitive, it is necessary to construction of some deviations to ease reduce these times for various sectors. This gradients and curvature along with extending includes reducing Sydney Melbourne from a the ability to run double stacked containers. long standing 13.5 hours (even when hauled by steam locomotives in the early 1960s) to 12 In a 1994 report, the NTPT [2, p69] identified or less hours. two competitive goals for rail. The first goal was to improve reliability and transit times, and Comparing 1998 actual average speeds [6], to reduce interstate rail freight full unit costs and recent ones as noted by the Bureau of down to 3 cents per net tonne km (tkm) over a Infrastructure, Transport and Regional few years. Economics (BITRE) [7, Table 13], between 1998 and 2010, there was little or no The second goal, and a longer term goal, was improvement on either the East West or the to get these costs down to 2 cents per tkm. In North South corridors. The situation for transit respect of the second competitive goal, the times has improved in recent years on the NTPT [2, p57] BTCE report noted ''About $3 North South corridor with the completion of a billion of investment is estimated to be NSW North Coast curve easing project in 2011 warranted over the next 20 year" including ($106m) and a somewhat delayed South about $1 billion (bn) for the Sydney Melbourne Sydney Freight Line in early 2013 ($960m - corridor, and another $1 bn for the Sydney which has also improved the reliability of Brisbane corridor.
Recommended publications
  • The Case for Inland Rail
    The Case for Inland Rail Summary of the 2015 Business Case 1 September 2015 It is also the safest solution. A typical train travelling on Inland Rail will have Dear readers the capacity of 108 B-Double trucks. Over the past 18 months, the Australian This will help avoid a huge burden on Rail Track Corporation has been our nation’s highways and avoid up to working with PricewaterhouseCoopers 15 serious crashes each year. Over to develop a detailed business case for the lifetime of this asset that’s 1500 Inland Rail – the long awaited freight rail serious crashes. connection between Brisbane Inland Rail is part of an integrated and Melbourne. solution. Until now, the natural As Inland Rail will require a major geographic constraints and slow transit funding commitment and will have times of the coastal rail line have meant far-reaching implications for the that rail could never be completely logistics, farming and resources sectors competitive with road on the east coast. as well as road and rail commuters, I Once Inland Rail is constructed, rail and thought it was important to share the road will do their part in sharing the findings of our work with you. freight load, with rail taking the heavy long haul freight, and road taking the Why do we need Inland Rail? Every day short haul freight. our freight task grows – freight volumes are forecast to more than double by the This road competitive service will year 2050. Put simply, our existing reduce transit times to less than transport network won’t cope with this 24 hours, with reliability, freight increase in freight without availability and pricing to meet further investment.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Sydney Freight Corridor
    Northern Sydney Freight Corridor Scoping Phase Completion Report Document information Scoping Phase Completion Report - final for publishing 13 Feb Document No. 2012.doc Revisions Revision 1 Draft 30/01/2012 Revision 2 Final 09/02/2012 Northern Sydney Freight Corridor Program Scoping Phase Completion Report Contents Background ............................................................................................................................................. 1 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 2 1.1 Northern Sydney Freight Corridor ............................................................................. 2 1.2 Need for the NSFC Program ..................................................................................... 5 1.3 NSFC Program scoping phase .................................................................................. 6 1.3.1 Functional scope definition ......................................................................... 7 1.3.2 Options development ................................................................................. 8 1.3.3 Options assessment ................................................................................... 9 1.4 Preferred projects ....................................................................................................10 1.4.1 Future options & alternatives ...................................................................11 2 Options overview and assessment
    [Show full text]
  • Sydney - Brisbane Land Transport
    University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Engineering and Information Faculty of Informatics - Papers (Archive) Sciences 1-1-2007 Sydney - Brisbane Land Transport Philip G. Laird University of Wollongong, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/infopapers Part of the Physical Sciences and Mathematics Commons Recommended Citation Laird, Philip G.: Sydney - Brisbane Land Transport 2007, 1-14. https://ro.uow.edu.au/infopapers/760 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] Sydney - Brisbane Land Transport Abstract This paper shall commence with reference to the draft AusLink Sydney - Brisbane corridor strategy. Section 2 will outline the upgrading of the Pacific Highway, Section 3 will examine the existing Sydney - Brisbane railway whilst Section 4 will outline some 2009 - 2014 corridor upgrade options with particular attention to external costs and energy use as opposed to intercity supply chain costs. The conclusions are given in Section 5. The current population of the coastal regions of the Sydney - Brisbane corridor exceeds 8 million. As shown by Table I, the population is expected to be approaching 11 million by 2031. The draft strategy notes that Brisbane and South East Queensland will become Australia's second largest conurbation by 2026. Keywords land, transport, brisbane, sydney Disciplines Physical Sciences and Mathematics Publication Details Laird, P. G. (2007). Sydney - Brisbane Land Transport. Australasian Transport Research Forum (pp. 1-14). Online www.patrec.org - PATREC/ATRF. This conference paper is available at Research Online: https://ro.uow.edu.au/infopapers/760 Sydney - Brisbane land transport Sydney - Brisbane Land Transport Philip Laird University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia 1 Introduction This paper shall commence with reference to the draft AusLink Sydney - Brisbane corridor strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Melbourne–Brisbane Inland Rail Alignment Study Final Report July 2010 Melbourne–Brisbane Inland Rail Alignment Study Final Report July 2010
    Melbourne–Brisbane Inland Rail Alignment Study Final Report July 2010 Melbourne–Brisbane Inland Rail Alignment Study Final Report July 2010 Photos in this report are included only as illustrations. They do not imply that operating companies whose trains are depicted would use the inland railway. Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Terms of reference ................................................................................................................ 3 1.2 The three stages of working papers ...................................................................................... 4 2. Approach to the study ................................................................................. 7 A. Market take up .......................................................................................... 8 3. Demand for Inland Rail ................................................................................ 9 3.1 Freight in the inland railway corridor (all modes) ...................................................................... 9 3.2 Modal analysis methodology ................................................................................................ 10 3.2.1 Price and service attributes assumed........................................................................ 11 3.3 Capacity constraints in the base case .................................................................................. 15 3.4 Demand results ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tottenham to Albury Inland Rail and North East Rail Line Upgrade Projects
    TOTTENHAM TO ALBURY INLAND RAIL AND NORTH EAST RAIL LINE UPGRADE PROJECTS DECEMBER NEWSLETTER VIC At Australian Rail Track Corporation (ARTC) In Victoria we are delivering two we’re all for rail. Across Australia we manage projects between now and 2025 to improve freight and passenger services and maintain a vast rail network and are along the North East rail line. working hard to bring more of the benefits We’re on track with the North East Rail of rail to more people. Line Upgrade to improve the reliability and ride quality for passenger services between Melbourne and Albury-Wodonga. We’re also tackling the causes of major delays such as signal failures due to copper line wire theft. We’re also delivering the Victorian section of Inland Rail from Tottenham to Albury along the same existing track. Inland Rail is the missing link in our national supply chain, transforming how everyday goods are moved around our vast country, creating more opportunities for regions to connect to cities and businesses to markets. Throughout the year we’ve continued to hold community conversations and information sessions at train stations, shows, town centres and community meetings to share our plans and hear feedback about the freight and passenger projects ARTC is delivering. Most recently we were at the Seymour Show, in the main street at Euroa and Wangaratta and hosted a stall at the Wodonga and Tallarook Farmers Markets. We’ll be back out in the community in 2020. Look out for social media updates and in local papers to find out when we’ll be next in your town.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment 4: the Case for Inland Rail the CASE for INLAND RAIL
    Attachment 4: The Case for Inland Rail THE CASE FOR INLAND RAIL 1 Dear readers Over the past 18 months, the Australian Rail Track Corporation has been working with PricewaterhouseCoopers to develop a detailed business case for Inland Rail – the long awaited freight rail connection between Brisbane and Melbourne. As Inland Rail will require a major funding commitment and will have far-reaching implications for the logistics, farming and resources sectors as well as road and rail commuters, I thought it was important to share the findings of our work with you. Why do we need Inland Rail? Every day our freight task grows – freight volumes are forecast to more than double by the year 2050. Put simply, our existing transport network won’t cope with this increase in freight without further investment. The existing coastal line is heavily constrained with passing through the congested Sydney network, long transit times, and cannot accommodate highly efficient, long double-stacked trains. A new, standard-gauge rail connection is essential to meet Australia’s growing freight challenge. Inland Rail is the safe, sustainable solution to the freight challenge and will transform the way we move freight around the country. This new 1700km freight rail line will bypass the congested Sydney network and the circuitous north coast line, connecting Melbourne to Brisbane via Australia’s four richest farming regions in Victoria, New South Wales and Queensland. It will enhance the national freight rail network – connecting our capital cities, farms, mines and ports, creating jobs, reducing supply chain costs and making Australian exports more competitive.
    [Show full text]
  • Pandemic Perspectives President’S Report Welcome to Our Special Coronavirus Edition of the Gateway
    Newsletter of the Brooklyn Community Association Inc May 2020 Next Issue August 2020 Special Edition Pandemic Perspectives President’s Report Welcome to our special coronavirus edition of the Gateway. We hope this finds you and your family well and healthy. So far, we have been fortunate in our community with no diagnosed cases of Covid-19 and we hope that it remains that way! The pandemic and the legislated isolation orders changed our lives. At the beginning, we were asked to stay at home unless you were an essential worker or needed groceries and medicine. Restaurants, schools, art and theatre and sport all shuttered down. If it was possible, we stayed at home working and our children stayed at home for online learning assisted by their parents. We have lost a couple of our elders in the community (not Covid-19) in the last few months and our thoughts are with their families. It hasn’t been easy not seeing or hugging family and friends, but our community for the most part has been lucky. We had to self-isolate (iso) in this gorgeous remarkable place alongside a kind and caring community. Our local businesses made quick changes so they could keep serving the public. All our restaurants moved to a takeaway model, some delivered, and some helped the community to get essential items by ordering through their suppliers. Neighbours made sure everyone was ok and had groceries, some teaching others how to order online groceries for the first time. We thank our community- you have been tremendous. Enjoy this edition and our stories- stay healthy! Di Bowles, President Brooklyn Community Association [email protected] Gateway printed in Black & White, Online in Colour The Gateway Newsletter is produced in both printed form; distributed to some 600 households in Brooklyn and the Lower Hawkesbury; and in online form, on the Brooklyn Community Association’s website.
    [Show full text]
  • 11.19 Senate RRAT Cttee Inland Rail
    Submission to the Senate Standing Committees on Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport Management of the Inland Rail project by the Australian Rail Track Corporation and the Commonwealth Government Philip Laird, University of Wollongong, November 2019 This submission will address route planning and selection processes along with any other related matters of the Committee Terms of Reference. It will in part update a submission made in June 2014 to the Inland Rail Implementation Group and draws from participation by this writer at Inland Rail conferences held in 2012 and 2018 at Parkes. It will also draw on observations made by the writer in a recent visit (September 2019) to Canada observing both CP and CN rail freight operations. This submission is based on research conducted at the University of Wollongong. However, the views and research findings are the responsibility of the writer. 1. The inland railway is a concept now over one hundred years old, and has been the subject of many papers and studies. Appendix A has a time line about the inland railway. 2. The inland railway is a project that ranks with the Alice Springs - Darwin railway that was finally completed in 2003. The weight of rail for the Northern Territory project was just 50 kg/m (a poor decision in retrospect as 60 kg/m would have been better) and the ruling curvature for most of the 1420 km of track was 1200 metres. The first Adelaide - Darwin freight train ran 15-17 January 2004 and the first passenger train ran 1-3 February 2004. Freight tonnages have exceeded initial projections and 15 years later, the line continues to carry passengers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case to Connect Inland Rail from Toowoomba to Gladstone Key National Infrastructure: Connecting Inland Rail to Gladstone Port
    T2G: MAKING THE RIGHT CONNECTION THE CASE TO CONNECT INLAND RAIL FROM TOOWOOMBA TO GLADSTONE KEY NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE: CONNECTING INLAND RAIL TO GLADSTONE PORT Quicker freight times to Asia Enable $15.6B resource investment in regional Queensland Bring forward Nathan Dam and pipeline project Lowering supply chain costs Deeper port enables larger container ships Up to 18,300 extra jobs in regional Queensland Develop a 4th major container port for eastern Australia Reduce the cost of Up to 3 years quicker delivery of the Potential to remove coal trains from Inland Rail by $4.8 B Inland Rail vision Brisbane suburban network 2 Toowoomba CONTENTS Gladstone Inland Rail ABOUT INLAND RAIL 4 THE CHALLENGE GETTING TO THE PORT OF BRISBANE 6 CONNECTING TO GLADSTONE PORT IS A BETTER OPTION 8 INLAND RAIL DEVELOPMENT OPTIONS FROM TOOWOOMBA 10 GLADSTONE PORT OVERVIEW 11 SEA FREIGHT PRODUCTIVITY 12 UNLOCKING NEW RESOURCE DEVELOPMENTS 14 BUILDING DEMAND FOR NEW WATER INFRASTRUCTURE 15 ECONOMIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT - CONSTRUCTION 16 ECONOMIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT - OPERATIONS 17 ASK OF THE STATE AND FEDERAL GOVERNMENT 18 3 ABOUT INLAND RAIL Australia’s freight task is growing, driven by a forecast increase in containerized trade. Demand Projections for Inland Rail (Mtpa) 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 TEU volumes (million TEUs) 0 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 2055 2060 2065 2070 2075 SEQ-Intercapital Import/Export Note: ARTC Demand projections highlight freight from Melbourne to Brisbane, Brisbane to Adelaide, and Brisbane to Perth. Source: ARTC (2015). ARTC 2015 Inland Rail Programme Business Case. 4 Toowoomba ABOUT INLAND RAIL Gladstone Inland Rail Gladstone Inland Rail is a visionary Gateway Mwy Port of project, aimed at future Brisbane 38 km from Acacia Ridge Brisbane proofing Australia’s economy Airport to Port of Brisbane as the freight task grows.
    [Show full text]
  • North East Rail Alliance and the ARTC Inland Rail Project Contents 1 Introduction to the North East Rail Alliance
    North East Rail Alliance and the ARTC Inland Rail Project Contents 1 Introduction to the North East Rail Alliance ....................................................................................... 1 Euroa Connect Issues and Reccomendations ..................................................................................... 3 Better Benalla Rail Issues and Recommendations ............................................................................ 10 Glenrowan Improvers considerations. ............................................................................................... 18 North East Rail Alliance media release February 2021 ..................................................................... 22 North East Rail Alliance media release March 2021 ......................................................................... 23 The purpose and aims of the NE Rail Alliance. The North East Rail Alliance (NERA) was formed in late 2020 and represents the local rail action groups, Euroa Connect, Better Benalla Rail, Glenrowan Improvers and the Wangaratta Rail Action Group. The Australian Rail Track Corporation (ARTC) plan to run 1.8 km long, double-stacked freight trains from Brisbane to Melbourne. The trains will utilize the XPT standard gauge line in North East Victoria. This will require major changes to several station precincts, including Euroa, Benalla and Glenrowan where these trains will not fit under the existing overpass bridges. The Alliance was formed in response to seemingly impenetrable difficulties with the ARTC that
    [Show full text]
  • Melbourne–Brisbane Inland Rail Alignment Study Working
    ARTC Melbourne–Brisbane Inland Rail Alignment Study Working Paper No. 6 Design Standards ARTC Contents Page Number 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Overview 1 1.2 Background to Melbourne–Brisbane Inland Rail 1 1.3 Study objectives, stages and working papers: 1 1.4 Roles of the Lead Technical Consultant (LTC) and the Financial and Economic Consultant (FEC) 3 1.5 Stage 1 analysis 3 1.6 Working Paper No.6 objectives 5 2. Methodology ................................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Background 6 2.2 Existing standards 7 2.3 Project scope of works 7 2.3.1 Context 8 3. Operations ...................................................................................................................................... 9 3.1 Summary 9 3.2 Reference train 9 3.2.1 Maximum load 9 3.3 Gradient 10 3.3.1 Standards 10 3.3.2 Existing ruling gradients 10 3.3.3 Effect of gradients on trains 11 3.3.4 Optimising gradients 13 3.4 Maximum speed 13 3.5 Double stack trains 13 3.6 Axle loads 13 3.6.1 Locomotive axle loads 14 3.6.2 Wagon axle loads 14 4. Permanent way ............................................................................................................................. 16 4.1 Methodology 16 4.2 Specific criteria 17 5. Signalling and communications .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Inland Rail Economic Analysis Central Queensland Regional Organisation of Councils February 2021 Toowoomba to Gladstone (T2g) Inland Rail Economic Analysis
    TOOWOOMBA TO GLADSTONE (T2G) INLAND RAIL ECONOMIC ANALYSIS CENTRAL QUEENSLAND REGIONAL ORGANISATION OF COUNCILS FEBRUARY 2021 TOOWOOMBA TO GLADSTONE (T2G) INLAND RAIL ECONOMIC ANALYSIS DOCUMENT CONTROL Job ID: J001901 Job Name: Inland Rail to Gladstone Port Economic Analysis Client: Central Queensland Regional Organisation of Councils Client Contact: John Abbott Project Manager: Jonathan Pavetto Email: [email protected] Telephone: 07 4771 5550 Document Name: Toowoomba to Gladstone (T2G) Inland Rail FINAL Last Saved: 19/2/2021 1:24 PM Version Date Reviewed Approved DRAFT v1.0 01/12/20 JP ARP DRAFT v2.0 19/01/21 JP ARP DRAFT v3.0 10/02/21 JP JP DRAFT v4.0 17/02/21 JP JP FINAL 19/02/21 JP JP Disclaimer: Whilst all care and diligence have been exercised in the preparation of this report, AEC Group Pty Ltd does not warrant the accuracy of the information contained within and accepts no liability for any loss or damage that may be suffered as a result of reliance on this information, whether or not there has been any error, omission or negligence on the part of AEC Group Pty Ltd or their employees. Any forecasts or projections used in the analysis can be affected by a number of unforeseen variables, and as such no warranty is given that a particular set of results will in fact be achieved. i TOOWOOMBA TO GLADSTONE (T2G) INLAND RAIL ECONOMIC ANALYSIS FOREWORD Inland Rail is Australia’s largest freight infrastructure project, which when fully developed is proposed to provide a standard gauge rail link between Melbourne and Brisbane.
    [Show full text]