DOCSLIB.ORG

2014 Invasive & Native Species Monitoring Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2014 Invasive & Native Species Monitoring Report 2014 Invasive & Native Species Monitoring Report Prevention, early detection, monitoring, rapid response, & control efforts OFFICE OF MAUNAKEA MANAGEMENT Prepared By: Jessica Kirkpatrick, Fritz Klasner February 6, 2019 Darcy Yogi, Page 1 of 105 Office of Maunakea Management TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................................ 4 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Prevention .................................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Inspections ............................................................................................................................................................................ 5 Study Area ......................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Methods ............................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Results and Discussion ................................................................................................................................................ 6 Early Detection Monitoring ................................................................................................................................................. 6 Facility Surveys .................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Study Area ......................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Methods ............................................................................................................................................................................. 7 Results & Discussion .................................................................................................................................................... 7 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................................................................... 14 2012 Addendum ........................................................................................................................................................... 15 Rotating Panel Surveys ................................................................................................................................................... 15 Study Area ....................................................................................................................................................................... 15 Methods ........................................................................................................................................................................... 17 Results & Discussion .................................................................................................................................................. 17 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................................................................... 18 Annual Alien Invertebrate Monitoring .................................................................................................................... 18 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................... 18 Study Area ....................................................................................................................................................................... 19 Methods ........................................................................................................................................................................... 19 Results & Discussion .................................................................................................................................................. 20 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................................................................... 34 Incidental Early Detection Monitoring .................................................................................................................... 34 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................... 34 Study Area ....................................................................................................................................................................... 34 Methods ........................................................................................................................................................................... 34 Results and Discussion .............................................................................................................................................. 36 2012 Addendum ........................................................................................................................................................... 38 2013 Addendum ........................................................................................................................................................... 39 Native & Established Species Monitoring .................................................................................................................... 40 Annual Wēkiu Bug Monitoring .................................................................................................................................... 40 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................... 40 Study Area ....................................................................................................................................................................... 40 Methods ........................................................................................................................................................................... 40 Results and Discussion .............................................................................................................................................. 41 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................................................................... 44 Follow-up Wēkiu Bug Monitoring.............................................................................................................................. 44 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................... 44 2014 Invasive & Native Species Monitoring Report Page 2 of 105 Office of Maunakea Management Study Site ......................................................................................................................................................................... 45 Methods ........................................................................................................................................................................... 45 Results and Discussion .............................................................................................................................................. 45 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................................................................... 47 Cinder Movement Monitoring ..................................................................................................................................... 47 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................... 47 Study Site ......................................................................................................................................................................... 47 Methods ........................................................................................................................................................................... 49 Results and Discussion .............................................................................................................................................. 49 Honey Bee Monitoring .................................................................................................................................................... 49 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................... 49 Study
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Research Article Ecological Observations of Native Geocoris Pallens and G
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation Psyche Volume 2013, Article ID 465108, 11 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/465108 Research Article Ecological Observations of Native Geocoris pallens and G. punctipes Populations in the Great Basin Desert of Southwestern Utah Meredith C. Schuman, Danny Kessler, and Ian T. Baldwin Department of Molecular Ecology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Hans-Knoll-Straße¨ 8, 07745 Jena, Germany Correspondence should be addressed to Ian T. Baldwin; [email protected] Received 5 November 2012; Accepted 16 April 2013 Academic Editor: David G. James Copyright © 2013 Meredith C. Schuman et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Big-eyed bugs (Geocoris spp. Fallen,´ Hemiptera: Lygaeidae) are ubiquitous, omnivorous insect predators whose plant feeding behavior raises the question of whether they benefit or harm plants. However, several studies have investigated both the potential of Geocoris spp. to serve as biological control agents in agriculture and their importance as agents of plant indirect defense in nature. These studies have demonstrated that Geocoris spp. effectively reduce herbivore populations and increase plant yield. Previous work has also indicated that Geocoris spp. respond to visual and olfactory cues when foraging and choosing their prey and that associative learning of prey and plant cues informs their foraging strategies. For these reasons, Geocoris spp. have become models for the study of tritrophic plant-herbivore-predator interactions. Here, we present detailed images and ecological observations of G. pallens Stal˚ and G.
    [Show full text]
  • Insecticideinduced Hormesis and Arthropod Pest Management
    Review Received: 31 August 2013 Revised: 7 October 2013 Accepted article published: 23 October 2013 Published online in Wiley Online Library: 2 December 2013 (wileyonlinelibrary.com) DOI 10.1002/ps.3669 Insecticide-induced hormesis and arthropod pest management Raul Narciso C Guedesa∗ and G Christopher Cutlerb Abstract Ecological backlashes such as insecticide resistance, resurgence and secondary pest outbreaks are frequent problems associated with insecticide use against arthropod pest species. The last two have been particularly important in sparking interest in the phenomenon of insecticide-induced hormesis within entomology and acarology. Hormesis describes a biphasic dose–response relationship that is characterized by a reversal of response between low and high doses of a stressor (e.g. insecticides). Although the concept of insecticide-induced hormesis often does not receive sufficient attention, or has been subject to semantic confusion, it has been reported in many arthropod pest species and natural enemies, and has been linked to pest outbreaks and potential problems with insecticide resistance. The study of hormesis remains largely neglected in entomology and acarology. Here, we examined the concept of insecticide-induced hormesis in arthropods, its functional basis and potential fitness consequences, and its importance in arthropod pest management and other areas. c 2013 Society of Chemical Industry Keywords: biphasic concentration–response; hormoligosis; insecticidal stress; insecticide ecotoxicology; pesticide-mediated homeostatic regulation; sublethal effects 1 HORMESIS: ANCIENT ADAGES, OLD LAWS group recognized the general nature of the phenomenon in a suc- AND CURRENT THEORY cession of meta-analyses.9–13 They suggested that the hormetic Friedrich Nietzsche in his Twilight of the Idols (1888) expressed dose–response model is more common in toxicology than the threshold model (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Redescription and Generic Placement of Neopamera
    Zootaxa 3430: 61–68 (2012) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2012 · Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Redescription and generic placement of Neopamera mumfordi (Van Duzee, 1935) and Remaudiereana castanea (Van Duzee, 1935) (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Lygaeoidea: Rhyparochromidae) PABLO M. DELLAPÉ (1)(2) & M. B. MALIPATIL (3)(4) (1) División Entomología, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Paseo del Bosque s/n, B1900FWA, La Plata, Argentina. E-mail: [email protected] (2) Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Argentina (CONICET) (3) Department of Primary Industries, Knoxfield Centre, Private Bag 15, Ferntree Gully Delivery Centre, Vic. 3156, Australia. E-mail: [email protected] (4) La Trobe University, Bundoora, Vic. 3086, Australia. Abstract A new genus, Neocnemodus gen. nov., is erected to accommodate Neopamera mumfordi (Van Duzee) from the Marquesas Islands; the species is redescribed and illustrated, and its relationships with the genera Cnemodus Herrich-Schaeffer and Andercnemodus Brailovsky & Cervantes-Peredo are analysed. Another Marquesas Island myodochine species, Remaudiereana castanea (Van Duzee), is redescribed, illustrated, and its generic placement discussed. Key words: Myodochini, Marquesas, new genus, generic placement Introduction The worldwide distributed Myodochini is among the most diverse of the 14 tribes of Rhyparochromidae (Dellapé & Henry 2010). The tribe is more diverse in
    [Show full text]
  • Fecundity of Ant Queens in Relation to Their Age and the Mode of Colony Founding L
    Insectes Sociaux, Paris Masson, Paris, 1990 1990, Volume 37, n ~ 2, pp. 116-130 FECUNDITY OF ANT QUEENS IN RELATION TO THEIR AGE AND THE MODE OF COLONY FOUNDING L. KELLER (1) and L. PASSERA (2) (1) Musde Zoologique, Palais de Rumine, CP 448, 1000 Lausanne 17, Switzerland (2) Laboratoire d'Entomologie, Universitd Paul Sabatier, 118, route de Narbonne, F 31062 Toulouse Cedex, France, U.A. C.N.R.S. 303 Regu le 23 janvier 1989 Accept6 le 15 juin 1989 SUMMARY The change over time in the fecundity and weight of queens was investigated in three monogynous, independent colony founding species, Lasius niger, Camponotus ligniperda and C. herculaneus, and two polygynous dependent colony founding species, Plagiolepis pygmaea and Iridomyrmex humilis. Queens of the three species founding independently exhibited a similar pattern with a significant loss of weight between mating and the emergence of the first workers. In contrast, weights of queens of the species employing dependent colony founding remained more stable. Fecundity of queens founding inde- pendently increased slowly with time whereas fecundity of queens founding dependently reached the maximum level some weeks after the beginning of the first reproductive season. These results are discussed in relation to some differences in the life history (e.g., life-span) between queens utilizing independent and dependent colony founding. RESUME Fdcondit6 des reines de fourmis en relation avec leur &ge et le mode de fondation de la soci6t6 On a 6tud6 dans ce travail les variations en fonction du temps de la f6condit6 et du poids des reines fondatrices de trois esp6ces monogynes h fondation ind6pendante (Lasius niger, Camponotus ligniperda, Camponotus herculeanus) et de deux esp6ces polygynes h fondation d6pendante (Plagiolepis pygmaea et Iridomyrmex humilis).
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Review Cover Image: Hedgehog by Keith Kirk
    Dumfries & Galloway Wildlife Review Cover Image: Hedgehog by Keith Kirk. Keith is a former Dumfries & Galloway Council ranger and now helps to run Nocturnal Wildlife Tours based in Castle Douglas. The tours use a specially prepared night tours vehicle, complete with external mounted thermal camera and internal viewing screens. Each participant also has their own state- of-the-art thermal imaging device to use for the duration of the tour. This allows participants to detect animals as small as rabbits at up to 300 metres away or get close enough to see Badgers and Roe Deer going about their nightly routine without them knowing you’re there. For further information visit www.wildlifetours.co.uk email [email protected] or telephone 07483 131791 Contributing photographers p2 Small White butterfly © Ian Findlay, p4 Colvend coast ©Mark Pollitt, p5 Bittersweet © northeastwildlife.co.uk, Wildflower grassland ©Mark Pollitt, p6 Oblong Woodsia planting © National Trust for Scotland, Oblong Woodsia © Chris Miles, p8 Birdwatching © castigatio/Shutterstock, p9 Hedgehog in grass © northeastwildlife.co.uk, Hedgehog in leaves © Mark Bridger/Shutterstock, Hedgehog dropping © northeastwildlife.co.uk, p10 Cetacean watch at Mull of Galloway © DGERC, p11 Common Carder Bee © Bob Fitzsimmons, p12 Black Grouse confrontation © Sergey Uryadnikov/Shutterstock, p13 Black Grouse male ©Sergey Uryadnikov/Shutterstock, Female Black Grouse in flight © northeastwildlife.co.uk, Common Pipistrelle bat © Steven Farhall/ Shutterstock, p14 White Ermine © Mark Pollitt,
    [Show full text]
  • Occasional Papers
    NUMBER 120, 17 pages 25 May 2017 BISHOP MUSEUM OCCASIONAL PAPERS THE SPIDERS OF RAPA NUI (E ASTER ISLAND ) R EVISITED DARKO D. C OTORAS , J. J UDSON WYNNE , LUIS FLORES -P RADO & C RISTIAN VILLAGRA BISHOP MUSEUM PRESS HONOLULU Cover image: The potentially endemic and undescribed Tetragnatha sp., believed restricted to the totora reeds lin - ing the shores of Rano Raraku crater lake. Photo: Darko Cortoras. Bishop Museum Press has been publishing scholarly books on the natu - ESEARCH ral and cultural history of Hawai‘i and the Pacific since 1892. The R Bishop Museum Occasional Papers (eISSN 2376-3191) is a series of short papers describing original research in the natural and cultural sci - PUBLICATIONS OF ences. BISHOP MUSEUM The Bishop Museum Press also publishes the Bishop Museum Bulletin series. It was begun in 1922 as a series of monographs presenting the results of research throughout the Pacific in many scientific fields. In 1987, the Bulletin series was separated into the Museum’s five current monographic series, issued irregularly and, since 2017, electronically: Bishop Museum Bulletins in Anthropology (eISSN 2376-3132) Bishop Museum Bulletins in Botany (eISSN 2376-3078) Bishop Museum Bulletins in Entomology (eISSN 2376-3124) Bishop Museum Bulletins in Zoology (eISSN 2376-3213) Bishop Museum Bulletins in Cultural and Environmental Studies (eISSN 2376-3159) To subscribe to any of the above series, or to purchase individual publi - cations, please write to: Bishop Museum Press, 1525 Bernice Street, Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817-2704, USA. Phone: (808) 848-4135. Email: [email protected]. BERNICE PAUAHI BISHOP MUSEUM ISSN 0893-1348 (print) The State Museum of Natural and Cultural History ISSN 2376-3191 (online) 1525 Bernice Street Copyright © by Bishop Museum Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817-2704, USA Published online: 25 May 2017 ISSN (online): 2376-3191 Spiders of Rapa Nui (Easter Island) Revisted .
    [Show full text]
  • Ant Damage to Banana Fruits by Abdominal Secretions Scot Nelson and Glenn Taniguchi Department of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences
    Insect Pests June 2012 IP-29 Ant Damage to Banana Fruits by Abdominal Secretions Scot Nelson and Glenn Taniguchi Department of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences ome ants can directly dam- HCO2H. This subfamily of ants age plants and agricultural uses formic acid, which they commoditiesS (Peng and Chris- eject or spray from an acidopore tian 2007); at least two species located at the end of the abdo- of ants in Hawai‘i damage the men, to attack other animals and skin of banana fruits with their for self-defense. Formic acid abdominal secretions. These is the simplest carboxylic acid ants spray their secretions to and one of the strongest acids protect sap-feeding insects, known, with a pH between 2 from which they derive sweet, and 3. It can produce painful nutritious honeydew. The forag- injuries to human skin, causing ing ants may also enter a self-de- skin burns and eye irritation of fense mode and spray secretions fieldworkers. In Hawai‘i, the if disturbed by banana cultiva- ant species that produce formic tion practices that jar the banana acid are Anoplolepis gracilipes; plant, or if they are startled Paratrechina longicornis; Pla- when pesticide sprays impact giolepis allaudi; Nylanderia the banana bunches. The marks vaga; Nylanderia bourbonica; and scars caused by their secre- Lepisiota hi01; Camponotus tions, although they are cosmetic variegatus, and Brachymyrmex and do not affect the fruit pulp, obscurior. can make the fruits unmarket- Hawaiian apple banana (Dwarf Brazilian ‘Santa On the east side of the Big Catarina’ variety) fruits with the typical symp- able.
    [Show full text]
  • Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of Bermuda
    212 Florida Entomologist 87(2) June 2004 ANTS (HYMENOPTERA: FORMICIDAE) OF BERMUDA JAMES K. WETTERER1 AND ANDREA L. WETTERER2 1Wilkes Honors College, Florida Atlantic University, 5353 Parkside Drive, Jupiter, FL 33458 2Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Environmental Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027 ABSTRACT For more than 50 years, two exotic ant species, Linepithema humile (Mayr) and Pheidole megacephala (F.), have been battling for ecological supremacy in Bermuda. Here we summa- rize known ant records from Bermuda, provide an update on the conflict between the domi- nant ant species, and evaluate the possible impact of the dominant species on the other ants in Bermuda. We examined ant specimens from Bermuda representing 20 species: Brachy- myrmex heeri Forel, B. obscurior Forel, Camponotus pennsylvanicus (De Geer), Cardio- condyla emeryi Forel, C. obscurior Wheeler, Crematogaster sp., Hypoponera opaciceps (Mayr), H. punctatissima (Roger), L. humile, Monomorium monomorium Bolton, Odontomachus rug- inodis Smith, Paratrechina longicornis (Latreille), P. vividula (Nylander), P. megacephala, Plagiolepis alluaudi Forel, Solenopsis (Diplorhoptrum) sp., Tetramorium caldarium Roger, T. simillimum (Smith), Wasmannia auropunctata (Roger), and an undetermined Dacetini. Records for all but three (H. punctatissima, P. vividula, W. auropunctata) include specimens from 1987 or later. We found no specimens to confirm records of several other ant species, in- cluding Monomorium pharaonis (L.) and Tetramorium caespitum (L.). Currently, L. humile dominates most of Bermuda, while P. megacephala appear to be at its lowest population lev- els recorded. Though inconspicuous, B. obscurior is common and coexists with both dominant species. Paratrechina longicornis has conspicuous populations in two urban areas. Three other ant species are well established, but inconspicuous due to small size (B.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 City of York Biodiversity Action Plan
    CITY OF YORK Local Biodiversity Action Plan 2017 City of York Local Biodiversity Action Plan - Executive Summary What is biodiversity and why is it important? Biodiversity is the variety of all species of plant and animal life on earth, and the places in which they live. Biodiversity has its own intrinsic value but is also provides us with a wide range of essential goods and services such as such as food, fresh water and clean air, natural flood and climate regulation and pollination of crops, but also less obvious services such as benefits to our health and wellbeing and providing a sense of place. We are experiencing global declines in biodiversity, and the goods and services which it provides are consistently undervalued. Efforts to protect and enhance biodiversity need to be significantly increased. The Biodiversity of the City of York The City of York area is a special place not only for its history, buildings and archaeology but also for its wildlife. York Minister is an 800 year old jewel in the historical crown of the city, but we also have our natural gems as well. York supports species and habitats which are of national, regional and local conservation importance including the endangered Tansy Beetle which until 2014 was known only to occur along stretches of the River Ouse around York and Selby; ancient flood meadows of which c.9-10% of the national resource occurs in York; populations of Otters and Water Voles on the River Ouse, River Foss and their tributaries; the country’s most northerly example of extensive lowland heath at Strensall Common; and internationally important populations of wetland birds in the Lower Derwent Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Inventory and Assessment Report, Fall 2018 Caltech Submillimeter Observatory, Maunakea, Hawai‘I
    Biological Inventory and Assessment Report, Fall 2018 Caltech Submillimeter Observatory, Maunakea, Hawai‘i Action BoardApril 2019 Prepared for: Sustainable Resources Group Intn’l, Inc. Prepared by: Matthew J Medeiros, PhD [email protected] mattjmedeiros.comFor All photographs in this report are copyrighted by Matthew J Medeiros. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Caltech Submillimeter Observatory Decommissioning ................................................................ 1 1.2 Physical Setting ............................................................................................................................. 1 2 METHODS ........................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Permit and Personnel .................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Schedule ........................................................................................................................................ 3 2.3 Nomenclature ................................................................................................................................ 3 2.4 Methodology for Inventorying Plants, Lichens, Non-arthropod Animals, and Abiotic Features . 3 2.4.1 Transects: Floral and Abiotic Features ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Epuraeosoma, a New Genus of Histerinae and Phylogeny of the Family Histeridae (Coleoptera, Histeroidea)
    ANNALES ZOOLOGIO (Warszawa), 1999, 49(3): 209-230 EPURAEOSOMA, A NEW GENUS OF HISTERINAE AND PHYLOGENY OF THE FAMILY HISTERIDAE (COLEOPTERA, HISTEROIDEA) Stan isław A dam Śl ip iń s k i 1 a n d S ław om ir Ma zu r 2 1Muzeum i Instytut Zoologii PAN, ul. Wilcza 64, 00-679 Warszawa, Poland e-mail: [email protected] 2Katedra Ochrony Lasu i Ekologii, SGGW, ul. Rakowiecka 26/30, 02-528 Warszawa, Poland e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. — Epuraeosoma gen. nov. (type species: E. kapleri sp. nov.) from Malaysia, Sabah is described, and its taxonomic placement is discussed. The current concept of the phylogeny and classification of Histeridae is critically examined. Based on cladistic analysis of 50 taxa and 29 characters of adult Histeridae a new hypothesis of phylogeny of the family is presented. In the concordance with the proposed phylogeny, the family is divided into three groups: Niponiomorphae (incl. Niponiinae), Abraeomorphae and Histeromorphae. The Abraeomorphae includes: Abraeinae, Saprininae, Dendrophilinae and Trypanaeinae. The Histeromorphae is divided into 4 subfamilies: Histerinae, Onthophilinae, Chlamydopsinae and Hetaeriinae. Key words. — Coleoptera, Histeroidea, Histeridae, new genus, phylogeny, classification. Introduction subfamily level taxa. Óhara provided cladogram which in his opinion presented the most parsimonious solution to the Members of the family Histeridae are small or moderately given data set. large beetles which due to their rigid and compact body, 2 Biology and the immature stages of Histeridae are poorly abdominal tergites exposed and the geniculate, clubbed known. In the most recent treatment of immatures by antennae are generally well recognized by most of entomolo­ Newton (1991), there is a brief diagnosis and description of gists.
    [Show full text]
  • Recerca I Territori V12 B (002)(1).Pdf
    Butterfly and moths in l’Empordà and their response to global change Recerca i territori Volume 12 NUMBER 12 / SEPTEMBER 2020 Edition Graphic design Càtedra d’Ecosistemes Litorals Mediterranis Mostra Comunicació Parc Natural del Montgrí, les Illes Medes i el Baix Ter Museu de la Mediterrània Printing Gràfiques Agustí Coordinadors of the volume Constantí Stefanescu, Tristan Lafranchis ISSN: 2013-5939 Dipòsit legal: GI 896-2020 “Recerca i Territori” Collection Coordinator Printed on recycled paper Cyclus print Xavier Quintana With the support of: Summary Foreword ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Xavier Quintana Butterflies of the Montgrí-Baix Ter region ................................................................................................................. 11 Tristan Lafranchis Moths of the Montgrí-Baix Ter region ............................................................................................................................31 Tristan Lafranchis The dispersion of Lepidoptera in the Montgrí-Baix Ter region ...........................................................51 Tristan Lafranchis Three decades of butterfly monitoring at El Cortalet ...................................................................................69 (Aiguamolls de l’Empordà Natural Park) Constantí Stefanescu Effects of abandonment and restoration in Mediterranean meadows .......................................87
    [Show full text]