In the Court of the Principal District & Sessions Judge, Coimbatore

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

th Thursday, this the 30 day of July, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2038/2020

1. Lakshmi (Age 55 years) W/o.Late.Balan

2. R. Rajan (Age 42 years) S/o.Rangasamy

3. R. Venkatesh (Age 20 years) S/o.Rajan … Petitioners / Accused

/vs/ State, through the Inspector of Police, Thadagam Police Station, Crime No.276/2020 Offence: u/s.147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324, 506(i) of IPC and 4 of Tamilnadu Prohibition of Harrasement of Women Act. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court No.1, Coimbatore.)

This petition is filed on behalf of the petitioners to release them on Anticipatory bail u/s.438 Cr.P.C.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Thiru. P.G.Vijay, Advocate for the petitioners / Accused and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and also the reply submitted by the Public Prosecutor through e-mail, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:- ORDER

This Court has perused the both side’s records and heard through Video Conference. The petitioners are the accused in Crime No.276/2020 of Thadagam Police Station, since they are apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences u/s.147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) IPC r/w Sec.4 of Women Harassment Act, they have filed this petition, seeking grant of anticipatory bail.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner appeared before this Court through Video Conference and submitted that the 1st petitioner is working as servant in the house of the defacto complainant for the past six years. The defacto complainant is an Ex-councilor and he is an influential person. Further the defacto complainant’s wife is suffering from uterus problem for several years. Due to which, the defacto complainant tried to misbehave with 1st petitioner and he gave sexual torture to her for the past six years. The 1st petitioner belongs to poor family and hence, she tolerated the harassment given by the defacto complainant. On knowing this, the defacto complainant’s wife, threatened her and insisted to admit the offence. The learned counsel further submitted that the 1st petitioner appeared before the Commissioner of Police, Coimbatore and preferred complaint and the same was forwarded to Periyanaickenpalayam Police Station. The learned counsel further submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case and they never committed any offence as alleged and prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

3. The learned Public Prosecutor sent reply through e-mail wherein he has stated that the petitioners have not appeared before the respondent police for enquiry. It is further stated that on receipt of information from Pavithra hospital, Thadagam about the victim, the respondent police had gone there and recorded the statement of the victim and thereafter based on the said statement, registered the case. It is further stated that victim and her husband and 2 children are residing in the place of occurrence. Accused Lakshmi [1st petitioner herein] is working as servant in the house of the victim for past 5 years. On 30-06-2020, A-1 had stolen some gold jewels from the house of the victim and the same was noticed two days later. Thereafter A-1 enquired the victim about the same. Thereafter A-1 did not come to work to the house of the victim. Hence complaint was files and case was registered against A-1 in Crime No.275/2020, for the offence u/s.381 of IPC. On knowing this, when the Victim was in house with her children and her mother, the A-1 called her son-in-law / A-2 & Son / A-3 with other 4 accused persons and had come to the house of the victim’s house and had scolded in filthy languages and also assaulted with hands and legs, A-3 had also took one knife and tried to stab the victim. The victim raised alarm and on hearing the sound, the mother of the victim and other came there and on seeing them, the accused persons fled away from that place. It is further stated that in this case, the victim was admitted in the hospital on 08-07-2020 and discharged on 09-07-2020. Further in this case, investigation is not yet completed and in the said circumstances, if anticipatory bail is granted to the petitioners, they try to threaten the victim and also try to tamper the witnesses and hence, the prosecution raised objection to the petition.

5. After considering all the above said aspects, considering the nature of offence, stage of investigation, since victim has been discharged from the hospital and also considering other circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions:-

(i) Anticipatory bail is granted to the petitioners.

(ii) The petitioners shall execute a bond for Rs.10,000/- each in the event of their arrest or the petitioners shall surrender before the Judicial Magistrate No.1, Coimbatore, and execute a bond of Rs.10,000/- each within 15 days from the date resuming regular Court working.

(iii) The petitioners shall produce two sureties likesum each to the value of Rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate No.1, Coimbatore, within 15 days from the date of resuming regular Court working.

(iv) The petitioners are directed to sign before the respondent police daily twice i.e., daily at 10.00 a.m. and 4.00 p.m., until further orders.

(v) The petitioners or their men shall not tamper the evidence.

(vi) The petitioners shall not abscond and they shall co-operate with the investigation agency as and when required.

(vii) In case of the condition No.(ii) to (vi) are violated, it is open to the investigating officer to file appropriate application before the learned Judicial Magistrate for cancellation of bail granted hereby, as held by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji /vs/ State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560].

This order is typed, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 30th day of July, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Judicial Magistrate No.1, Coimbatore. 2. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 3. The Inspector of Police, Thadagam Police Station, Coimbatore. 4. Counsel for the Petitioners / Accused persons.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

th Thursday, this the 30 day of July, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2085/2020

S.Manikanda Prabhu (Age 27 years) S/o.K.Selvaraj … Petitioner / Accused

/vs/ State, through the Inspector of Police, Selvapuram Police Station, Crime No.1406/2020 Offence: u/s.120(B), 411, 414, 406, 420 of IPC. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court No.5, Coimbatore.)

The petitioner seeks relaxation of the condition imposed on him in C.M.P.No.1910/2020 dated.07-07-2020.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Tvl. M.Zackriya and T.Bharathi Raja, Advocates for the petitioner / Accused and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and also the reply submitted by the Public Prosecutor through e-mail, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

This Court has perused the both side’s records and heard through Video Conference.

The petitioner seeks relaxation of the condition which is already imposed on him as per the order passed by this Court in C.M.P.No.1910/2020, dated 07-07-2020.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner appeared before this Court through Video Conference and submitted that anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioner as per the order passed by this Court in C.M.P.1910/2020, dated 07-07-2020 with a condition to appear and sign before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m., until further orders along with other conditions. As per the order passed by this Court, the petitioner has been complying with the condition from 09-07-2020 without any violation. Hence, the petitioner comes forward with the present petition to relax the condition totally.

3. The learned Public Prosecutor submitted his reply through e-mail wherein he has stated that anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioner as per the order passed by this Court in C.M.P.1910/2020, dated 0707-2020. When at the time of granting anticipatory bail, this Court directed the petitioner to produce two sureties like sum each to the value of Rs.10,000/- to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate No.5, Coimbatore, within 15 days from the date of resuming regular Court working. Further the petitioner is directed to sign before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m., As per the order passed by this Court, the petitioner has been complying the condition from 08-07-2020 to 28-07-2020. But as of now, the petitioner has not produced sureties as ordered by this Court. In the said circumstances, the prosecution raised objection to relax the condition totally.

4. Considering the above said aspects, having regard to the period of compliance, nature of offence and also considering the prevailing situation, this Court is inclined to modify the condition which is already imposed upon the petitioner.

5. Accordingly the petitioner is directed to sign before the respondent police, once in a week i.e., on every Monday at 10.00 a.m., until further orders. Further the petitioner is directed to file surety papers in the drop box placed in the Court campus.

This order is typed, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 30th day of July, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE. CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Judicial Magistrate No.5, Coimbatore. 2. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 3. The Inspector of Police, Selvapuram Police Station, Coimbatore. 4. Counsel for the Petitioner / Accused. IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

th Thursday, this the 30 day of July, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2086/2020

1. Kathar Hussain (Age 45 years) S/o.Shek Abdul Kathar

2. Saiyathu Ibrahim @ Syed Ibrahhim (Age 41 years) S/o.Mohamed moideen

3. Abthul Kathar @ Vadai Kathar (Age 44 years) S/o.Abdul Wahab

4. Mohamed Haniba @ Mohammed Haneef (Age 44 years) S/o.Habeeb Mohammed

5. Paisal Alias Faizal Rahman (Age 37 years) S/o.Sulthan

6. Harish (Age 31 years) S/o.Sahabudeen

7. Mohamed Ibrahim (Age 38 years) S/o.Aneeba … Petitioners / Accused No.1, 2, 5, 7, 8, 9 and 10

/vs/ State, through the Inspector of Police, Selvapuram Police Station, Crime No.204/2020 Offence: u/s.143, 341, 153-B, 504(ii) of IPC. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court No.5, Coimbatore.)

The petitioners seek relaxation of the condition imposed on them in C.M.P.No.1061/2020 dated 09-07-2020.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Tvl. M.Zackriya and T.Bharathi Raja, Advocates for the petitioners / Accused and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and also the reply submitted by the Public Prosecutor through e-mail, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

This Court has perused the both side’s records and heard through Video Conference.

The petitioners seek relaxation of the condition imposed on them in C.M.P.No.1061/2020 dated 09-07-2020.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners appeared before this Court through Video Conference and submitted that anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioners as per the order passed by this Court in C.M.P.1061/2020, dated 09-07-2020 with a condition to appear and sign before the respondent police daily at 10.03 a.m., until further orders along with other conditions. As per the order passed by this Court, the petitioners have been complying with the condition from 10-07-2020 without any violation. Hence, the petitioners come forward with the present petition to relax the condition totally.

3. The learned Public Prosecutor submitted his reply through e-mail wherein he has stated that anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioners as per the order passed by this Court in C.M.P.1601/2020, dated 09-07-2020. When at the time of granting bail, this Court directed the petitioners to produce two sureties like sum each to the value of Rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate No.5, Coimbatore, within 15 days from the date of resuming regular Court working. Further the petitioners are directed to sign before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., As per the order passed by this Court, the petitioners have been complying the condition from 11-07-2020 to 28-07-2020. But as of now, the petitioners had not produced sureties as ordered by this Court. In the said circumstances, the prosecution raised objection to relax the condition totally.

5. Accordingly the petitioners are directed to sign before the respondent police, once in a week i.e., on every Monday at 10.00 a.m., until further orders. Further the petitioners are directed to file surety papers in the drop box placed in the Court campus.

This order is typed, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 30th day of July, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Judicial Magistrate No.5, Coimbatore. 2. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 3. The Inspector of Police, Selvapuram Police Station, Coimbatore. 4. Counsel for the Petitioners / Accused persons.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Thursday, this the 30th day of July, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2089/2020

Ameen (age 26 years) S/o. Hamsa … Petitioner / Accused

/vs/

State, through the Inspector of Police, Vadavalli Police Station, Crime No.1380/2020 Offence: u/s.450, 395 and 397 of IPC. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court No.6, Coimbatore.)

This petition is filed on behalf of the petitioner to release him on bail u/s.439 of Cr.P.C.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Thiru. M.Sahabudeen, Advocate for the petitioner / Accused and Thiru M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and also the reply submitted by the Public Prosecutor through e-mail, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

This Court has perused the both side’s records and heard through Video Conference.

The petitioner is the accused persons in Crime No.1380/2020 of Vadavalli Police Station, Coimbatore, for the alleged offences u/s.450, 395 and 397 of IPC, he has filed this petition, seeking grant of bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that on 22-05-2020, five persons have been trespassed into the house of the defacto complainant and attacked the inmates of the house including the defacto complainant and snatched gold ornaments, cell phones and cash around Rs.8,500/- from them.

3. In the petition submitted on behalf of the petitioner, it is stated that the petitioner is driver by profession for the past many years. During the time of lockdown, one person named Sadam called this petitioner and asked him to come as acting driver without informing any other reasons. Believing his words, the petitioner accepted to work as an acting driver. It is further stated that the petitioner is an innocent and he is the sole bread winner of his family and he never committed any offence as alleged and he is in judicial custody from 13-06-2020 and prayed to release the petitioner on bail.

4. The learned Public Prosecutor sent reply through e-mail wherein he has stated that there are six accused in this case. The petitioner is arrayed as A-4. A-2 and A-3 were arrested and remanded. A-5 and A-6 are still absconding. The defacto complainant is working as Manager in one private car and two wheelers dealer’s company. It is further submitted that on the date of occurrence, A-1 / Sathya had called the defacto complainat and enquired about purchase of one vehicle for her friend Santhi and invited the defacto complainant to Santhi’s house. The defacto complainant had also gone to the house of Santhi at 1.30 p.m., Within half an hour, all the 5 accused persons trespassed into the house of Santhi. At that time, all the accused were wearing mask and they threatened the defacto complainant by showing knife and robbed 5 sovereigns of bracelet, 3 ½ sovereigns of chain, cash Rs. 500/- and one mobile phone worth Rs.10,000/- and also one of the accused threatened threatened Santhi and robbed 2.5 grams of ear ring, 2.5 grams of finger ring, 2 ½ sovereigns of chain and Rs.4,000/-, from Sathya and the accused persons had taken Rs.4,000/- from the house and fled away from the place. It is further stated that during the course of investigation, the respondent police, by tracking the mobile number of the Sathya and found that she was also involved in this offence and on 27-05-2020, the respondent police went to the house of Sathya for enquiry and she accepted the offence made by her with other accused persons. Thereafter she was arrested and remanded. Based on the confession of Sathya, and on receipt of one secret information from informer about A-2, the respondent police arrested A-2 near Ukkadam Bye-pass and after arrest, he surrendered one Knife, Rs.25,000/- and one cell phone. On verification of the photos and videos in the said cell phone, the respondent police came to know that in the said cell phone, nude state of the accused Sathya was recorded. Subsequently, based on the confession given by Sathya, other accused persons were in arrested in various places. As of now, A5 & A6 are not yet arrested. Some of the accused were released on bail. Further in this case, investigation is not yet completed and one previous case is pending against the petitioner. In the said circumstances, if the petitioner is released on bail, he may try to escape to any other State or place and he may try to abscond and hence, the prosecution raised objection to the petition.

5. This Court has considered the averments made in the petition as well as the reply submitted by the learned Public Prosecutor. The petitioner is in judicial custody from 13-06-2020. According to the petitioner, he has been falsely implicated in this case and he never committed any offence as alleged. It appears from the reply submitted by the learned Public Prosecutor, in this case, initially A-1 Sathya contacted the defacto complainant with regard to purchase of a second hand vehicle and asked him to come to a particular house. The defacto complainant went there. Subsequently, all of a sudden, all the accused trespassed into the said house and committed the offence. After registering the case, during the course of investigation, the respondent police, by tracking the mobile number of the Sathya and found that she was also involved in this offence and thereafter she was arrested and remanded. After arrest, she gave confession and admitted the offence committed by her along with other accused. Thereafter A-2 was arrested and from the mobile phone recovered from A-2, the respondent police verified the said cell phone and found photos of Sathya. Thereafter some other accused were arrested. Further except the present case, one case is pending against the petitioner.

6. After considering all the above said aspects, considering the nature of offence, period of incarceration, and other circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions:-

(i) The petitioner is ordered to be enlarged on bail on his executing a bond for Rs.10,000/- with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate No.6, Coimbatore.

(ii) The petitioner is directed to file surety document before the Court concerned in advance and thereafter the learned Magistrate shall allot time to verify the sureties.

(iii) The petitioner is directed to sign before the respondent police, daily at 10.00 a.m., until further orders.

(iv) The petitioner or his men shall not tamper the evidence.

(v) The petitioner shall not abscond and he shall co-operate with the investigation agency as and when required.

(vi) Violation of any of the condition imposed by this Court will result in cancellation of the bail.

(vii) In case of the condition No.(i) to (v) are violated, it is open to the investigating officer to file appropriate application before the learned Judicial Magistrate for cancellation of bail granted hereby, as held by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji /vs/ State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560].

This order is typed, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 30th day of July, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Judicial Magistrate No.6, Coimbatore. 2. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Coimbatore. 3. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 4. The Inspector of Police, Vadavalli Police Station, Coimbatore. 5. Counsel for the Petitioner / Accused.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

th Thursday, this the 30 day of July, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2090/2020

Y.K.Rajkumar @ Kalyana Rajkumar (Age 44 years) S/o.Yesuvadian … Petitioner / Accused

/vs/ State, through the Inspector of Police, Pothanur Police Station, Crime No.Not known Offence: u/s. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate, Madukkarai.)

This petition is filed on behalf of the petitioner to release him on Anticipatory bail u/s.438 Cr.P.C.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Thiru. R.Gangatharan, Advocate for the petitioner / Accused and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and also the reply submitted by the Public Prosecutor through e-mail, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

This Court has perused the both side’s records and heard through Video Conference.

The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail.

The learned Public Prosecutor appeared before this Court and requested to adjourn this petition to 04-08-2020. At request of the learned Public Prosecutor, this petition is adjourned to 04-08-2020.

Call on 040-08-2020.

This order is typed, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 30th day of July, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 2. The Inspector of Police, Pothanur Police Station, Coimbatore. 3. Counsel for the Petitioner / Accused.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

th Thursday, this the 30 day of July, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2101/2020

Raja Sherif (Age 25 years) S/o.Abbas … Petitioner / Accused

/vs/ State, through the Inspector of Police, B1, Bazaar Police Station, Crime No.713/2020 Offence: u/s.506(ii) of IPC @ 153(A), 505(1)(b), 507, 506(ii) of IPC. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court No.5, Coimbatore.)

The petitioner seeks relaxation of the condition imposed on him in C.M.P.No.1827/2020 dated 08-07-2020.

ORDER

This Court has perused the both side’s records and heard through Video Conference.

The petitioner seeks relaxation of the condition imposed on him as per the order passed by this Court in C.M.P.1827/2020, dated 08-07-2020.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner appeared before this Court through Video Conference and submitted that bail was granted to the petitioner as per the order passed by this Court in C.M.P.1827/2020, dated 08-07-2020 with condition to sign before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders, along with other conditions. As per the order passed by this Court, the petitioner has been complying with the condition for the past 15 days without any violation. It is further stated that the petitioner is the resident of G.M.Nagar and he is the only bread winner of his family. Hence, the petitioner comes forward with the present petition.

3. The learned Public Prosecutor submitted his reply through e-mail wherein he has stated that bail was granted to the petitioner as per the order passed by this Court in C.M.P.1827/2020, dated 08-07-2020. When at the time of granting bail, this Court directed the petitioner to produce two sureties like sum each to the value of Rs.10,000/- to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate No.5, Coimbatore, within 15 days from the date of resuming regular Court working. Further the petitioner is directed to sign before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., As per the order passed by this Court, the petitioner has been complying the condition from 10-07-2020 to 29-07-2020. But as of now, the petitioner has not produced sureties as ordered by this Court. In the said circumstances, the prosecution raised objection to relax the condition totally.

This order is typed, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 30th day of July, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Judicial Magistrate No.5, Coimbatore. 2. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 3. The Inspector of Police, B1, Bazaar Police Station, Coimbatore. 4. Counsel for the Petitioner / Accused.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

th Thursday, this the 30 day of July, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2102/2020

1. Palanisamy @ Palani (Age 50 years) S/o.Murugan

2. Vadivel (38 years) S/o.Chinnarangasamy … Petitioners / Accused No.1 and 2

/vs/ State, through the Inspector of Police, Periyanaickenpalayam Police Station, Crime No.777/2020 Offence: u/s.4(1)(g) of TNP Act. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court No.5, Coimbatore.)

The petitioners seek relaxation of the condition imposed on them in C.M.P.No.1779/2020 dated 26-06-2020.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Tvl. V.Lakshmanan and M.Elangovan, Advocates for the petitioners / Accused and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and also the reply submitted by the Public Prosecutor through e-mail, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

This Court has perused the both side’s records.

The petitioners seek relaxation of the condition imposed on them as per the order passed by this Court in C.M.P.No.1779/2020 dated 26-06-2020.

2. In the petition submitted on behalf of the petitioners, it is stated that bail was granted to the petitioners as per the order passed by this Court in C.M.P.1779/2020, dated 26-06-2020 with a condition to sign before the respondent police daily twice until further orders along with other conditions. As per the order passed by this Court, the petitioners have been complying with the condition without any violation for the past 21 days. It is further stated that the petitioners are the coolie workers and they are the only bread winners of their family. Hence, the petitioners come forward with the present petition to relax the condition totally.

3. The learned Public Prosecutor submitted his reply through e-mail wherein he has stated that bail was granted to the petitioners as per the order passed by this Court in C.M.P.1779/2020, dated 26-06-2020. When at the time of granting bail, this Court directed the petitioners to produce two sureties like sum each to the value of Rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate No.5, Coimbatore, within 15 days from the date of resuming regular Court working. Further the petitioner is directed to sign before the respondent police daily twice. As per the order passed by this Court, the petitioners have been complying the condition from 29-06-2020 to 29-07-2020. But as of now, the petitioners had not produced sureties as ordered by this Court. In the said circumstances, the prosecution raised objection to relax the condition totally.

This order is typed, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 30th day of July, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE. CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Judicial Magistrate No.5, Coimbatore. 2. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 3. The Inspector of Police, Periyanaickenpalayam Police Station, Coimbatore. 4. Counsel for the Petitioners / Accused person. IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

th Thursday, this the 30 day of July, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2103/2020

1. Nataraj (Age 55 years) S/o.Gobi Nayakker

2. Vijay @ Vijayan (22 years) S/o.Nataraj

3. Alagu (Age 21 years) S/o.Nataraj … Petitioners / Accused

/vs/ State, through the Inspector of Police, Kinathukadavu Police Station, Crime No.1093/2020 Offence: u/s.294(b) and 307 of IPC. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court No.1, Pollachi.)

The petitioners seek relaxation of the condition imposed on them in C.M.P.No.1859/2020 dated 30-07-2020.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Thiru. S.Muruganandam, Advocate for the petitioners / Accused and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and also the reply submitted by the Public Prosecutor through e-mail, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

This Court has perused the both side’s records.

The petitioners seek relaxation of the condition imposed on them as per the order passed by this Court in C.M.P.No.1859/2020 dated 03-07-2020.

2. In the petition submitted on behalf of the petitioners, it is stated that bail was granted to the petitioners as per the order passed by this Court in C.M.P.1859/2020, dated 03-07-2020 with a condition to sign before the respondent police daily twice until further orders along with other conditions. As per the order passed by this Court, the petitioners have been complying with the condition without any violation from 06-07-2020 to till date. It is further stated that A-1 is a coolie worker and A-2 and A-3 are college student. They are not in a position to go to any work due to the compliance of the condition. Hence, the petitioners come forward with the present petition to relax the condition totally.

3. The learned Public Prosecutor sent reply through e-mail wherein he has stated that as per the order passed by this Court, the petitioners have been complying with the condition from 06-07-2020 to 29-07-2020 without any violation and the learned Public Prosecutor has not raised any serious objection to relax the condition totally.

4. Considering the above said aspects, having regard to the period of compliance, nature of offence and also considering the prevailing situation, this Court is inclined to relax the condition totally which is already imposed on the petitioners. Further the petitioners are directed to appear before the Court concerned on all the hearing dates without fail.

This order is typed, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 30th day of July, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 2. The Inspector of Police, Kinathukadavu Police Station, Coimbatore. 3. Counsel for the Petitioners / Accused person.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

th Thursday, this the 30 day of July, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2104/2020

Murugesan (Age 38 years) S/o.S.Mariappan … Petitioner / Accused No.1

/vs/ State, through the Inspector of Police, B3, Police Station, Crime No.813/2020 Offence: u/s.408, 420 and 120(B) of IPC. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court No.5, Coimbatore.)

The petitioner seeks relaxation of the condition imposed on him in C.M.P.No.1880/2020 dated 04-07-2020.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Tvl. N.Deepak Prasadh, S.Kowsalyadevi, and E.Gokula Priya, Advocates for the petitioner / Accused and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and also the reply submitted by the Public Prosecutor through e-mail, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

This Court has perused the both side’s records and heard through Video Conference.

The petitioner seeks relaxation of the condition imposed on him as per the order passed by this Court in C.M.P.1880/2020, dated 04-07-2020.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner appeared before this Court through Video Conference and submitted that anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioner as per the order passed by this Court in C.M.P.1880/2020, dated 04-07-2020 with condition to sign before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders, along with other conditions. As per the order passed by this Court, the petitioner has been complying with the condition from 10-07-2020 without any violation. The learned counsel further submitted that due to the compliance of the condition, the petitioner is unable to attend his occupation. Hence, the petitioner comes forward with the present petition.

3. The learned Public Prosecutor sent through e-mail wherein he has stated that bail was granted to the petitioner as per the order passed by this Court in C.M.P.1880/2020, dated 04-07-2020 with a condition to appear and sign before the respondent policed daily at 10.00 a.m., until further orders along with other conditions. As per the order passed by this Court, the petitioner has been complying with the condition for a period of 21 days without any violation. Further the learned Public Prosecutor has not raised any serious objection to relax the condition totally.

4. Considering the above said aspects, having regard to the period of compliance, nature of offence and also considering the prevailing situation, this Court is inclined to relax the condition totally which is already imposed on the petitioner. Further the petitioner is directed to appear before the Court concerned on all the hearing dates without fail.

This order is typed, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 30th day of July, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 2. The Inspector of Police, B-3, Police Station, Coimbatore. 3. Counsel for the Petitioner / Accused.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

th Thursday, this the 30 day of July, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2105/2020

Balasubramanian Adityan (Age 59 years) S/o.Adityan S T … Petitioner / Accused

/vs/ State, through the Inspector of Police, Rathinapuri Police Station, Crime No.706/2020 Offence: u/s.295A and 505(i)(b) of IPC. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court No.2, Coimbatore.)

The petitioner seeks relaxation of the condition imposed on him in C.M.P.No.1876/2020 dated 04-07-2020.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Tmt. / Selvi. J.Vanita Rosy, Advocate for the petitioner / Accused and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and also the reply submitted by the Public Prosecutor through e-mail, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

This Court has perused the both side’s records.

The petitioner seeks relaxation of the condition imposed on him as per the order passed by this Court in C.M.P.1876/2020, dated 04-07-2020.

2. In the petition submitted on behalf of the petitioner, it is stated that anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioner as per the order passed by this Court in C.M.P.1608/2020, dated 08-06-2020 with condition to sign before the respondent police daily twice until further orders, along with other conditions. Thereafter the petitioner filed relaxation petition in C.M.P.1876/2020, and the same was allowed by this Court on 04-07-2020. While allowing the said petition, this Court directed the petitioner to sign before the respondent police once in a week and also directed to the petitioner to file the sureties papers in the drop box placed in the combined Court campus. As per the order of this Court, on 06-07-2020, the petitioner placed surety papers in the box and surrendered with sureties on 13-07-2020. Further the petitioner has been complying with the order passed by this Court for a period of four weeks. Hence, the petitioner comes forward with the present petition.

3. The learned Public Prosecutor sent through e-mail wherein he has stated that as per the order passed by this Court the petitioner has been complying with the condition for a period of four weeks (once in a week) and the learned Public Prosecutor has not raised any serious objection to relax the condition totally.

4. Considering the above said aspects, having regard to the period of compliance, nature of offence and also considering the prevailing situation, this Court is inclined to relax the condition totally which is already imposed on the petitioner. Further the petitioner is directed to appear before the Court concerned on all the hearing dates without fail.

This order is typed, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 30th day of July, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 2. The Inspector of Police, Rathinapuri Police Station, Coimbatore. 3. Counsel for the Petitioner / Accused.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

th Thursday, this the 30 day of July, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2106/2020

Prakash (Age 24 years) S/o.Nepoleon … Petitioner / Accused

/vs/ State, through the Inspector of Police, Rathinapuri Police Station, Crime No.1112/2019 Offence: u/s.379 of IPC. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court No.2, Coimbatore.)

The petitioner seeks relaxation of the condition imposed on him in C.M.P.No.1813/2020 dated 06-07-2020.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Tvl. M.Vellaisamy, K.Navaneethakrishnan and A.Teena Roselin, Advocates for the petitioner / Accused and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and also the reply submitted by the Public Prosecutor through e-mail, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

This Court has perused the both side’s records.

The petitioner seeks relaxation of the condition totally which is already imposed on the petitioner as per the order passed by this Court in C.M.P.1813/2020, dated 06-07-2020.

2. In the petition submitted on behalf of the petitioner, it is stated that the petitioner was released on bail as per the order passed by this Court in C.M.P.1813/2020, dated 06-07-2020 with a condition to appear and sign before the respondent police daily twice until further orders along with other conditions. As per the order passed by this Court, the petitioner has been complying with the condition from 19-07-2020 without any violation. It is further stated that the petitioner’s native place is Thanjavur District and the petitioner stayed in Coimbatore and complied the condition. It is further stated that the petitioner is a daily wages coolie worker and he could not go to any work and hence, the petitioner comes forward with the present petition to relax the condition totally.

3. The learned Public Prosecutor sent reply through e-mail wherein he has stated that bail was granted to the petitioner as per the order passed by this Court in C.M.P.1813/2020, dated 06-07-2020 with a condition to appear and sign before the respondent police daily twice until further orders along with other conditions. As per the order passed by this Court, the petitioner has been complying with the condition for a period of 20 days without any violation. The learned Public Prosecutor has not raised any serious objection to relax the condition totally.

4. Considering the above said aspects, having regard to the period of compliance, nature of offence and also considering the prevailing situation, this Court is inclined to relax the condition totally which is already imposed on the petitioner. Further the petitioner is directed to appear before the Court concerned on all the hearing dates without fail.

This order is typed, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 30th day of July, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 2. The Inspector of Police, Rathinapuri Police Station, Coimbatore. 3. Counsel for the Petitioner / Accused.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

th Thursday, this the 30 day of July, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2107/2020

A. Shajahan (Age 25 years) S/o.Abdul Jabbar … Petitioner / Accused No.2

/vs/ State, through the Inspector of Police, Podanur (L & O) South, Police Station, Crime No.499/2019 Offence: u/s.S.18, 38 and 39 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act,1967 Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Principal District and Sessions Court, Coimbatore.)

The petitioner seeks relaxation of modification of the condition imposed on him in C.M.P.No.652/2020 dated 27-02-2020.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Thiru. R.Kalaiarasu, Advocate for the petitioner / Accused No.2 and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and also the reply submitted by the Public Prosecutor through e-mail, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

This Court has perused the both side’s records and heard through Video Conference.

The petitioner seeks relaxation of modification of the condition which is imposed on the petitioner as per the order passed by this Court in C.M.P.652/2020, dated 27-02-2020.

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner appeared before this Court through Video Conference and submitted that the petitioner has been signed regularly without any violation and prayed to modify or relax the condition totally.

The learned Public prosecutor requested to adjourn this petition to 31-07-2020.

At request of the learned Public Prosecutor, this petition is adjourned to 31-07-2020.

Call on 31-07-2020.

This order is typed, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 30th day of July, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 2. The Inspector of Police, Podanur (L & O) South, Police Station, Coimbatore. 3. Counsel for the Petitioner / Accused.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

th Thursday, this the 30 day of July, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2108/2020

R.Govindaraj (Age 53 years) S/o.Ramasamy … Petitioner / Accused No.33

/vs/ State, through the Inspector of Police, City Crime Police Station, Crime No.3/2020 Offence: u/s.120(b), 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 of IPC. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court No.7, Coimbatore.)

The petitioner seeks extension of time to comply the order passed by this Court in C.M.P.No.1846/2020 dated 08-07-2020.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Thiru. R.Kalaiarasu, Advocate for the petitioner / Accused, and Thiru C.Muruganandan, Advocate for the defacto complainant [CM.P.2150/2020], and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and also the reply submitted by the Public Prosecutor through e-mail, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

This Court has perused the both side’s records and heard through Video Conference.

2. The petitioner seeks extension of time to comply the order passed by this Court in C.M.P.No.1846/2020 dated 08-07-2020.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is arrayed as A-33 in this case and anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioner as per the order passed by this Curt in C.M.P.1846/2020, dated 08-07- 2020 with a condition that the petitioner shall deposit the original settlement deed [Doc.No.6827/2019] dated 19-06-2019 and original settlement deed [Doc.No.6906/2019] dated 20-06-2019 before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.7, Coimbatore, at the time of producing sureties. The petitioner is not able to contact his family friend to collect the above said original document, due to Covid-19 lockdown. Hence, the petitioner comes forward with the present petition.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the defacto complainant appeared before this Court through Video Conference and submitted his arguments.

4. The learned Public Prosecutor appeared before this Court and represented that any appropriate order may be passed, which deems fit to this case.

5. Considering the submissions made by either side, having regard to the nature of offence, and considering the present prevailing situation and other circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to allow this petition and thereby time is extended to the petitioner up to 12-08-2020, to comply the condition specified in the order passed by this Court in C.M.P.1846/2020, dated 08-07-2020, and the earlier order in C.M.P.1846/2020, dated 08-07-2020 passed by this Court stands good in other aspects and this petition is ordered accordingly.

This order is typed, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 30th day of July, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Judicial Magistrate No.7, Coimbatore. 2. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 3. The Inspector of Police, City Crime Branch, Police Station, Coimbatore. 4. Counsel for the Petitioner / Accused. 5. Counsel for the defacto complainant. IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

th Thursday, this the 30 day of July, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2109/2020

Anbazhagan (Age 37 years) S/o.Karuppasamy … Petitioner / Accused

/vs/ State, through the Inspector of Police, Annur Police Station, Crime No.1407/2020 Offence: u/s.328 of IPC and Section 24(1) of THE CIGARETTE AND OTHER TOBACCO PRODUCTS ACTS 2003 Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court, Mettupalayam.)

This petition is filed on behalf of the petitioner to release him on bail u/s.439 Cr.P.C.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Tvl. K.Silambarasan and S.K.Jeevikaa Sree, Advocates for the petitioner / Accused and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and also the reply submitted by the Public Prosecutor through e-mail, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

This Court has perused the both side’s records.

The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.1407/2020 of Annur Police Station, for the alleged offences u/s.328 IPC and Sec.24(1) of the Cigarette and other Tobacco Products Act, 2003, he has filed this petition, seeking grant of bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 22-07-2020, when the defacto complainant was engaged in regular patrolling duty, one Omni Vehicle came in Annur to Thennampalayam Road. The police party stopped the vehicle and on search, they found Hans and Vimal Pakka in a gunny bag. Hence, the complaint.

3. In the petition submitted on behalf of the petitioner, it is stated that the petitioner is an innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case and he never committed any offence as alleged and he is in judicial custody from 22-07- 2020 and prayed to release the petitioner on bail.

4. The learned Public Prosecutor sent reply through e-mail wherein he has stated that on the date of occurrence, as per the instruction of the Superior Officer, the respondent police went to the occurrence place and was engaged in regular patrolling duty. At that time, the respondent police received a secret message with regard to the sales of drug materials illegally like cigarette and pan masala, which is hazardous to human being. On receipt of that information, the respondent police stopped one Omni Van bearing Reg.No.TN 40 Q 3521, which came in Annur to Thennampalayam Road. When the respondent police stopped the vehicle, one person had got down from the vehicle. On enquiry, it came to know that the said person belongs to Jeeva Nagar, he is doing supply of soap and shampoo to the retails shops. Due to loss in business, had started to sell HANS packets. Thereafter the respondent police checked the vehicle and found 4500 Nos of Hans Tobacco packets, 6000 nos of Vimal Pan Masala packets. Thereafter the respondent police seized the said items and sample was taken and the same was sent to chemical examination. As of now, chemical report is not yet received. In this case, investigation is not yet completed and in the said circumstances, if the petitioner is released on bail, he may try to commit same type of offence and hence, the prosecution raised objection to the petition.

5. This Court has considered the averments made in the petition as well as the reply submitted by the learned Public Prosecutor. The petitioner has been remanded to judicial custody for the offences and the petitioner is in judicial custody from 22-07-2020. According to the petitioner, he has been falsely implicated in this case. It appears from the reply submitted by the learned Public Prosecutor, on the date of occurrence, the respondent police was engaged in vehicle checking, they stopped one omni vehicle and on checking the said vehicle, the respondent police seized 4500 Nos of Hans Tobacco packets, 6000 nos of Vimal Pan Masala packets. As of now, samples were sent to chemical analysis and report is awaited. Investigation is still pending.

6. After considering all the above said aspects, considering the nature of offence, date of arrest, stage of investigation, number of items recovered and also considering other circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage.

Hence, this petition is dismissed.

This order is typed, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 30th day of July, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 2. The Inspector of Police, Annur Police Station, Coimbatore. 3. Counsel for the Petitioner / Accused.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

th Thursday, this the 30 day of July, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2110/2020

Selvakumar (Age 40 years) S/o.Srinivasan … Petitioner / Accused

/vs/ State, through the Inspector of Police, Periyanaickenpalayam Police Station, Crime No.99/2020 Offence: u/s.302 of IPC. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court.5, Coimbatore.)

This petition is filed on behalf of the petitioner to release him on statutory bail u/s.167(2) of Cr.P.C.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Tvl. V.Lakshmanan and M.Elangovan, Advocates for the petitioner / Accused and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and also the reply submitted by the Public Prosecutor through e-mail, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

This Court has perused the both side’s records.

The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.99/2020 of Periyanaickenpalayam Police Station, for the alleged offences u/s.302 IPC, he has filed this petition, seeking grant of statutory bail.

The petitioner filed this petition u/s.167(2) of Cr.P.C., seeking grant of statutory bail. Hence, this petition is forwarded to the Judicial Magistrate’s Court No.5, Coimbatore, for disposal according to law.

Call on 04-08-2020.

This order is typed, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 30th day of July, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

th Thursday, this the 30 day of July, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION Nos.2111/2020 and 2113/2020

Dinesh (Age 20 years) S/o.Nagarajan … Petitioner in C.M.P.2111/2020 / Accused No.1

Harichandran (Age 20 years) S/o. Mahendran … Petitioner in C.M.P.2113/2020 / Accused

/vs/ State, through the Inspector of Police, B-2, R.S.Puram Police Station, Crime No.884/2020 Offence: u/s.379 of PC r/w 511 of IPC. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court.1, Coimbatore.)

These two petitions were filed on behalf of the petitioner in the respective petitions to release them on bail u/s.439 Cr.P.C.

These two petitions are coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Thiru. S.Rajendran, Advocate for the petitioner in C.M.P.2111/2020, and Thiru K.Manoj Pandi, Advocate for the petitioner in C.M.P.2113/2020, and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petitions submitted via e-mail and also the reply submitted by the Public Prosecutor through e-mail, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

COMMON ORDER

This Court has perused the both side’s records.

The petitioner in the respective petitions is the accused in Crime No.884/2020 of B-2 R.S.Puram Police Station, for the alleged offences u/s.379 of IPC r/w 511 of IPC, they have filed these two petitions separately, seeking grant of bail.

The learned Public Prosecutor sent reply through e-mail wherein he has stated that requested to adjourn this petition to 04-08-2020.

At request of the learned Public Prosecutor, this petition is adjourned to 04-08-2020.

Call on 04-08-2020.

This common order is typed, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 30th day of July, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 2. The Inspector of Police, B-2, R.S.Puram Police Station, Coimbatore. 3. Counsels for the Petitioner in the respective petitions / Accused persons.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

th Thursday, this the 30 day of July, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2112/2020

Harichandran (Age 20 years) S/o.Mahendran … Petitioner / Accused

/vs/ State, through the Inspector of Police, B2, R.S.Puram Police Station, Crime No.884/2020 Offence: u/s.379of IPC r/w 511 of IPC. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court.1, Coimbatore.)

This petition is filed on behalf of the petitioner to release him on bail u/s.439 Cr.P.C.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Thiru. K.Sakthivel, Advocate for the petitioner / Accused, and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and also the reply submitted by the Public Prosecutor through e-mail, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

This Court has perused the both side’s records.

The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.884/2020 of B-2 R.S.Puram Police Station, for the alleged offences u/s.379 of IPC r/w Sec.511 of IPC, he has filed this petition, seeking grant of bail.

The learned counsel for the petitioner sent a Memo through e-mail wherein he has stated that he does not press the petition.

Memo recorded.

In view of the memo filed by the petitioner’s counsel, this petition is dismissed as not pressed.

This order is typed, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 30th day of July, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 2. The Inspector of Police, B2, R.S.Puram Police Station, Coimbatore. 3. Counsel for the Petitioner / Accused.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

th Thursday, this the 30 day of July, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2114/2020

Aiyaluganesan (Age 36 years) S/o.Surulimuthu … Petitioner / Accused

/vs/ State, through the Inspector of Police, Kuniyamuthur Police Station, Crime No.870/2020 Offence: u/s.170, 454, 363, 395, 397 of IPC. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court No.7, Coimbatore.)

This petition is filed on behalf of the petitioner to release him on bail u/s.439 Cr.P.C.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Tvl. L.Ganaeshkumar and R. Rajith Kumar Advocates for the petitioner / Accused, and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and also the reply submitted by the Public Prosecutor through e-mail, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

This Court has perused the both side’s records.

The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.870/2020 of Kuniyamuthur Police Station, for the alleged offences u/s.170, 454, 363, 395 r/w 397 of IPC, he has filed this petition, seeking grant of bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner and other accused joined together and posing themselves as investigation officers and searched the complainant and found Ganja. Thereafter, they demanded money for not taking action and took them to various places and finally dropped them somewhere. Further they threatened the defacto complainant by showing knife and plugged ATM card and Laptop from the defacto complainant and thereby committed the offence.

3. In the petition submitted on behalf of the petitioner, it is stated that the petitioner is a Police Man, attached with Saibaba Colony Traffic Police Station. The petitioner and the defacto complainant are residing in the same area. The defacto complainant is an addict of kanja. He is a college student and doing the business of kanja selling to the college students and others. In several occasions, the petitioner warned the defacto complainant and his friends and advised them not to smoke and use kanja. The petitioner informed Kuniyamuthur Police Station about the kanja business of the defacto complainant. Based on the information, the respondent police took the defacto complainant to the police station. Thereafter, the defacto complainant and his friends could not sell kanja in the area and they developed enmity with this petitioner. It is further stated that during the lockdown period, regularly the defacto complainant and his friends gathered near the petitioner’s house and smoked kanja and also doing business of selling kanja. It is further stated that the petitioner is an innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case and he never committed any offence as alleged and his family members are suffering lot without the love and care of the petitioner and the petitioner is in judicial custody from 14-05-2020 and prayed to release the petitioner on bail.

4. The learned Public Prosecutor sent reply through e-mail wherein he has stated that there are ten accused in this case. The petitioner is arrayed as A-1. A-2 to A-6 and A-10 were arrested and remanded on 14-05-2020. A-7 and A-8 are still absconding. A-9 was arrested and remanded on 30-05-2020. The defacto complainant’s native place is Dharmapuri and he had come to Coimbatore for the purpose of his education and he has done his graduation in B.Sc., CSA in a private college. At present he is staying in BK Pudur. Due to the lockdown, all the friends of the defacto complainant left to their native place. The defacto complainant alone remains in his room. Therefore, the defacto complainant had come to his friend Gokul’s room which is in Kovaipudur. It is further stated that the said Gokul had also went to his native place. Therefore, the defacto complainant alone is staying in the room. Usually his friends Praveen and Ganesh were visiting the room regularly. They are having the habit of using kanja. On 26-04-2020, suddenly A-1 [petitioner herein] came to the defacto complainant’s room and posing himself as police officials and informed that he conducted search in the said premises. Later A-1 called A-2, who had kept mechanic shop opposite to the room of the defacto complainant. A-2, informed that A-1 is police officer and thereafter, A-1 and A-2, joined together and started to threaten the defacto complainant and his two friends by stating that they may be arrested for using kanja and a case will be registered against them. They also threatened and recorded a video, in which A-1 made to give confession like the defacto complainant was selling kanja. On showing the said video, the accused persons continuously demanded Rs.50,000/- from the defacto complainant for not to file any case. Believing their words, the defacto complainant and his two friends were afraid and they gave Rs.3,000/- and thereafter they had given Rs.43,000/- on various dates. It is further stated that the accused had sent the said video to other persons and they had also came to the defacto complainant’s room and acted like police and they also started to demand money from the defacto complainant by showing the said vide. The defacto complainant had got frightened and had given Rs.38,000/- on various dates. They had also taken the defacto complainant’s apple iphone as well as his bike. The accused persons were continuously demanding money from the defacto complainant. Therefore the defacto complainant had went to some place and hided himself and switched off his mobile. At that time, the accused persons contacted one Kumar who is the friend of the defacto complainant and had assaulted him and insisted the said Kumar to show the whereabouts of the defacto complainant. It is further stated that in this case, on 18-03-2020, the respondent police arrested A-1 to A-8 in various places and after arrest, the accused gave confession and admitted the offence. Further in this case, investigation is not yet completed. The accused persons had stolen more than Rs.75,000/- from the defacto complainant and apple iphone and bike. In the above said circumstances, if the petitioner released on bail, he may try to threaten the defacto complainant and also they try to escape from the clutches of law and hence, the prosecution raised objection to the petition. It is further stated that the earlier bail petitions filed by the petitioner were dismissed by this Court in three occasions.

5. This Court perused the averments made in the petition, FIR as well as the reply submitted by the learned Public Prosecutor. The petitioner is in judicial custody from 14-05-2020. According to the petitioner, he has been falsely implicated in this case and he never committed any offence as alleged and he is in judicial custody for more than 75 days. It appears from the reply submitted by the learned Public Prosecutor and on perusal of FIR, it appears that the petitioner is the main person in the present crime and he joined his hands with other accused and committed the offence. Further in this case, investigation is not yet completed.

6. After considering all the above said aspects into consideration, even though the petitioner is in judicial custody for more than 75 days, considering the nature of offence, manner of offence said to have been committed, and also other considering circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

Hence, this petition is dismissed.

This order is typed, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 30th day of July, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 2. The Inspector of Police, Kuniyamuthur Police Station, Coimbatore. 3. Counsel for the Petitioner / Accused.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

th Thursday, this the 30 day of July, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2115/2020

Stephenraj (Age 28 years) S/o.Francisraj … Petitioner / Accused

/vs/ State, through the Inspector of Police, E3, Saravanampatti Police Station, Crime No.1261/2020 Offence: u/s.75(1)(c) of TNCP Act, 147, 148, 397, 506(2) of IPC. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court.2, Coimbatore.)

This petition is filed on behalf of the petitioner to release him on bail u/s.439 Cr.P.C.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Thiru. K.Sakthivel, Advocate for the petitioner / Accused and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and also the reply submitted by the Public Prosecutor through e-mail, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

This Court has perused the both side’s records.

The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.1261/2020 of E-3 Saravanampatti Police Station, for the alleged offences u/s.75(1)(c) of TNCP Act and u/s.147, 148, 397 and 506(ii) IPC, he has filed this petition, seeking grant of bail.

The learned Public Prosecutor sent reply through e-mail wherein he has stated that already bail was granted to the petitioner by the JM Court.

In the said circumstances, the counsel for the petitioner is directed to appear before this Court through Video Conference on 04-08-2020.

Call on 04-08-2020.

This order is typed, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 30th day of July, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 2. The Inspector of Police, E3, Saravanampatti Police Station, Coimbatore. 3. Counsel for the Petitioner / Accused.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

th Thursday, this the 30 day of July, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2116/2020

B.Ramesh @ Ramesh Antony S/o.Balakrishnan … Petitioner / Accused

/vs/ State, through the Inspector of Police, Thudiyalur Police Station, Crime No.1471/2020 Offence: u/s.379 of IPC Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court No.1, Coimbatore.)

This petition is filed on behalf of the petitioner to release him on bail u/s.439 Cr.P.C.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Tvl. M.Paramasivam and P.Kalpana, Advocates for the petitioner / Accused and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and also the reply submitted by the Public Prosecutor through e-mail, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

This Court has perused the both side’s records and heard through Video Conference.

The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.1471/2020 of Thudiyalur Police Station, for the alleged offence u/s.379 IPC, he has filed this petition, seeking grant of bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner and yet another accused joined and committed the offence of theft of centering sheet.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner appeared before this Court and submitted that this petitioner is a commission broker for second hand sales of four wheeler vehicles. The petitioner gave one Eicher lorry to A-1 as second hand sales. This petitioner has no knowledge about the business of A-1. No such occurrence was happened as alleged by the complainant. The learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner’s son preferred a complaint through on-line and the same is pending. Further on 16-06-2020, since the petitioner had not returned to home, the petitioner’s son and mother and other relatives approached the Commissioner of Police and preferred a complaint. No action was taken on that complaint. The learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner is an innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case and he never committed any offence as alleged and he is in judicial custody from 17-06-2020 and prayed to release him on bail.

4. The learned Public Prosecutor sent reply through e-mail wherein he has stated that there are two accused in this case. The petitioner is A-2. A-1 was arrested and remanded. It is further stated that the defacto complainant is doing contract work and he is a centering Engineer. On 10-06-2020 i.e., the date of occurrence, when the defacto complainant had got centering sheets 50 nos for doing construction work and had arranged the same in the place of occurrence. Thereafter at about 10.00 p.m., the owner of the building had seen the entire centering sheet and left to home and slept. Next day morning the defacto complainant had found those centering sheets were found missing and hence, he filed the complaint. During the course of investigation, the police had came to know that the offence was happened truly. Thereafter on receipt of information from secret informer, the respondent police had gone to Saravanampatti to Vellakinaru Road, near check post and doing vehicle checking. At that time, they found two persons were coming in two wheeler bearing Reg.No.TN 31 AD 7148 and had stopped them and enquired them. But they did not answer property. Thereafter the respondent police arrested them and after arrest, they gave confession and admitted the offence. Further in this case, stolen property has been recovered and except the present case, seven previous cases are pending against the accused. It is further stated that in this case, investigation is not yet completed and in the said circumstances, if the petitioner is released on bail, he may try to escape to some other district and hence, the prosecution raised objection to the petition.

5. This Court has perused the averments made in the petition as well as the reply submitted by the learned Public Prosecutor. The petitioner has been remanded to judicial custody for the offence u/s.379 IPC and he is in judicial custody from 17-06-2020. According to the petitioner, he never committed any offence as alleged and he has been falsely roped in this case as well as the other cases. It appears from the reply submitted by the learned Public Prosecutor, in this case, the stolen property has been recovered. Except the present case, seven previous cases are pending against the petitioner.

6. After considering all the above said aspects, considering the nature of offence, period of incarceration, and since stolen property has been recovered, and also considering other circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions:-

(i) The petitioner is ordered to be enlarged on bail on his executing a bond for Rs.10,000/- with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate No.1, Coimbatore.

(ii) The petitioner is directed to file surety document before the Court concerned in advance and thereafter the learned Magistrate shall allot time to verify the sureties.

(iii) The petitioner is directed to sign before the respondent police, daily at 10.00 a.m., until further orders.

(iv) The petitioner or his men shall not tamper the evidence.

(v) The petitioner shall not abscond and he shall co-operate with the investigation agency as and when required.

(vi) Violation of any of the condition imposed by this Court will result in cancellation of the bail.

This order is typed, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 30th day of July, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Judicial Magistrate No.1, Coimbatore. 2. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Coimbatore. 3. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 4. The Inspector of Police, Thudiyalur Police Station, Coimbatore. 5. Counsel for the Petitioner / Accused

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

th Thursday, this the 30 day of July, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2117/2020

S.Manikandan (Age 26 years) S/o.Sakthivel … Petitioner / Accused

/vs/ State, through the Inspector of Police, Saravanampatti Police Station Crime No.1086/2020 Offence: u/s.302 of IPC. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court No.2, Coimbatore.)

This petition is filed on behalf of the petitioner to release him on bail u/s.439 Cr.P.C.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Tvl. J.Muralidharan and S.Karthikeyan, Advocates for the petitioner/Accused and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and also the reply submitted by the Public Prosecutor through e-mail, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

This Court has perused the both side’s records and heard through Video Conference.

The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.1086/2020 of Saravanampatty Police Station, for the alleged offences u/s.302 of IPC, he has filed this petition, seeking grant of bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that on 08-05-2020, there was some wordy quarrel between the petitioner and the deceased Sivakumar. In the said process, the petitioner assaulted the deceased by using tumbles and due to which, the deceased died.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner appeared before this Court through Video Conference and submitted that previously, three bail petitions filed by the petitioner were dismissed by this Court. The learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner is an innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case, he never committed any offence as alleged and he is in judicial custody from 08-05-2020 and prayed to release the petitioner on bail.

4. The learned Public Prosecutor sent reply through e-mail wherein he has stated that the defacto complainant, deceased and the accused were working in same company and they are residing in the same house. Frequently, there arose some wordy quarrel between the accused and the deceased with regard to love and love failure. Due to the interference of other friends, the quarrel has been settled. It is further stated that one day before the occurrence, the deceased and accused and other 3 friends joined together and consumed liquor. At that time, there arose some wordy quarrel between the parties and subsequently the same was settled by other friends. But due to the vengeance, when the deceased had come down from his room, all of a sudden, the accused assaulted him with scissors. The defacto complainant had taken the deceased to the hospital and after treatment had come back to house and all had slept in separate room. Thereafter, at about 5.00 p.m., defacto complainant and one Srikanth, who is the room-mate heard the sound of the deceased. They went to the room and found the accused was assaulting the deceased with thumbles. Due to the assault made by the accused, the deceased become unconscious with full of bleeding. The defacto complainant and Srikanth tried to catch the accused. But the accused pushed them aside and fled away from the room. Thereafter the deceased was admitted in the Government Hospital, Coimbatore and on the same day, the deceased died. It is further stated that later on 09-05-2020, on receipt of information from the informer, the police went to Avarampalayam, New Fly-over and found the accused. On seeing the police party, the accused tried to escape. The police party rounded up and caught him. On enquiry, the accused accepted the offence made by him. It is further stated that in this case, after completing investigation, the respondent police filed charge sheet before the Court concerned and same is yet to be numbered.

5. This Court has considered the averments made in the petition as well as the reply submitted by the learned Public Prosecutor. The petitioner is in judicial custody from 08-05-2020. According to the petitioner, he has been falsely implicated in this case. It appears from the reply submitted by the learned Public Prosecutor, the alleged occurrence happened due to the wordy quarrel between the parties. Further in this case, due to the assault made by the accused, one Sivakumar died. Further in this case, after completing investigation, the respondent police filed charge sheet before the Court concerned and same is yet to be numbered.

6. After considering all the above said aspects, considering the nature of offence, period of incarceration, and due to the filing of charge sheet, also considering other circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions:-

(i) The petitioner is ordered to be enlarged on bail on his executing a bond for Rs.10,000/- with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate No.2, Coimbatore.

(ii) The petitioner is directed to file surety document before the Court concerned in advance and thereafter the learned Magistrate shall allot time to verify the sureties.

(iii) The petitioner is directed to sign before the respondent police, daily at 10.00 a.m., until further orders.

(iv) The petitioner or his men shall not tamper the evidence.

(v) The petitioner shall not abscond and he shall co-operate with the investigation agency as and when required.

(vi) Violation of any of the condition imposed by this Court will result in cancellation of the bail.

This order is typed, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 30th day of July, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE. CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Judicial Magistrate No.2, Coimbatore. 2. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Coimbatore. 3. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 4. The Inspector of Police, Saravanampatti Police Station, Coimbatore. 4. Counsel for the Petitioner / Accused.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

th Thursday, this the 30 day of July, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2118/2020

1. Ajith (Age 24 years)(A1) S/o.Rajak 2. Muthu Mohamed (Age 25 years)(A2) S/o.Jabarullah … Petitioners / Accused No.1, 2

/vs/ State, through the Inspector of Police, E2, Peelamedu Police Station, Crime No.1604/2020 Offence: u/s.392 of IPC. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court.2, Coimbatore.)

This petition is filed on behalf of the petitioners to release them on bail u/s.439 Cr.P.C.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Tvl. A.Nowfal, S.Sheik Mohamed, K.Vasanthakumar, S.Sathiya Balan and A. Mohamed Faisal, Advocates for the petitioners / Accused No.1, 2 and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and also the reply submitted by the Public Prosecutor through e-mail, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

This Court has perused the both side’s records.

The petitioners are the accused in Crime No.1604/2020 of E-2 Peelamedu Police Station, for the alleged offences u/s.392 IPC, they have filed this petition, seeking grant of bail.

The learned Public Prosecutor sent reply through e-mail wherein he has requested to adjourn this petition to 05-08-2020.

At request of the learned Public Prosecutor, this petition is adjourned to 05-08-2020.

Call on 05-08-2020.

This order is typed, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 30th day of July, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 2. The Inspector of Police, E-2 Peelamedu Police Station, Coimbatore. 3. Counsel for the Petitioners / Accused person.

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

th Thursday, this the 30 day of July, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2119/2020

Jubin Varghese (Age 40 years) S/o.Puvulesh … Petitioner / Accused No.2

/vs/ State, through the Inspector of Police, M-4, Thudiyalur Police Station, Crime No.1516/2020 Offence: u/s.379 of IPC. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court.1, Coimbatore.)

This petition is filed on behalf of the petitioner to release him on bail u/s.439 Cr.P.C.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Tvl. C.Dineshkumar, K.Sakthivel and M.Kokila, Advocates for the petitioner / Accused No.2 and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and also the reply submitted by the Public Prosecutor through e-mail, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

This Court has perused the both side’s records.

The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.1516/2020 of M-4 Thudiyalur Police Station, for the alleged offences u/s.379IPC, he has filed this petition, seeking grant of bail.

The learned Public Prosecutor sent reply through e-mail wherein he has requested to adjourn this petition to 03-08-2020.

At request of the learned Public Prosecutor, this petition is adjourned to 03-08-2020.

Call on 03-08-2020.

This order is typed, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 30th day of July, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 2. The Inspector of Police, M-4, Thudiyalur Police Station, Coimbatore. 3. Counsel for the Petitioner / Accused

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

th Thursday, this the 30 day of July, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2120/2020

Prabhu (Age 30 years) S/o.Subbu … Petitioner / Accused

/vs/ State, through the Inspector of Police, M-4, Thudiyalur Police Station, Crime No.1544/2020 Offence: u/s.379 of IPC. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court.1, Coimbatore.)

This petition is filed on behalf of the petitioner to release him on bail u/s.439 Cr.P.C.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Thiru. S.Rajendran, Advocate for the petitioner / Accused, and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and also the reply submitted by the Public Prosecutor through e-mail, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

This Court has perused the both side’s records.

The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.1544/2020 of M-4 Thudiyalur Police Station, for the alleged offences u/s.379 IPC, he has filed this petition, seeking grant of bail.

The learned Public Prosecutor sent reply through e-mail wherein he has requested to adjourn this petition to 03-08-2020.

At request of the learned Public Prosecutor, this petition is adjourned to 03-08-2020.

Call on 03-08-2020.

This order is typed, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 30th day of July, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 2. The Inspector of Police, M-4, Thudiyalur Police Station, Coimbatore. 3. Counsel for the Petitioner / Accused

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

th Thursday, this the 30 day of July, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2121/2020

T. Vijayakumar (Age 42 years) S/o.Thirupathi … Petitioner / Accused

/vs/ State, through the Inspector of Police, B-2, R.S.Puram (Crime) Police Station, Crime No.910/2020 Offence: u/s.380 and 511 of IPC. Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court.1, Coimbatore.)

This petition is filed on behalf of the petitioner to release him on bail u/s.439 Cr.P.C.

This petition is coming on this day for final hearing before this Court in the presence of Tvl. S.Sakthivel and M.Sidique Ahamed, Advocates for the petitioner / Accused and Thiru. M.Kanagaraj, Public Prosecutor, represented for State, upon perusing the petition submitted via e-mail and also the reply submitted by the Public Prosecutor through e-mail, having stood over for consideration till this Court, this Court pronounced the following:-

ORDER

This Court has perused the both side’s records.

The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.910/2020 of B-2 Crime Police Station, for the alleged offences u/s.380 and 511 of IPC, he has filed this petition, seeking grant of bail.

The learned Public Prosecutor sent reply through e-mail wherein he has requested to adjourn this petition to 03-08-2020.

At request of the learned Public Prosecutor, this petition is adjourned to 03-08-2020.

Call on 03-08-2020.

This order is typed, corrected and pronounced by me via email on this 30th day of July, 2020.

Sd/- R. SAKTHIVEL., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

CC to ( sent via email):

1. The Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. 2. The Inspector of Police, B-2, R.S.Puram (Crime) Police Station, Coimbatore. 3. Counsel for the Petitioner / Accused

IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

Present: Thiru R. SAKTHIVEL, B.A., B.L., PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

th Thursday, this the 30 day of July, 2020

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.2122/2020

B.Ramesh @ Ramesh Antony S/o.Balakrishnan … Petitioner / Accused

/vs/ State, through the Inspector of Police, Thudiyalur Police Station, Crime No.1473/2020 Offence: u/s.379 of IPC Through the Public Prosecutor, Coimbatore. … Complainant (The Judicial Magistrate Court No.1, Coimbatore.)

This petition is filed on behalf of the petitioner to release him on bail u/s.439 Cr.P.C.

ORDER

This Court has perused the both side’s records and heard through Video Conference.

The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.1473/2020 of Thudiyalur Police Station, for the alleged offence u/s.379 IPC, he has filed this petition, seeking grant of bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner and yet another accused joined and committed the offence of theft of centering sheet. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner appeared before this Court and submitted that this petitioner is a commission broker for second hand sales of four wheeler vehicles. The petitioner gave one Eicher lorry to A-1 as second hand sales. This petitioner has no knowledge about the business of A-1. No such occurrence was happened as alleged by the complainant. The learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner’s son preferred a complaint through on-line and the same is pending. Further on 16-06-2020, since the petitioner had not returned to home, the petitioner’s son and mother and other relatives approached the Commissioner of Police and preferred a complaint. No action was taken on that complaint. The learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner is an innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case and he never committed any offence as alleged and he is in judicial custody from 17-06-2020 and prayed to release him on bail.

4. The learned Public Prosecutor sent reply through e-mail wherein he has stated that there are two accused in this case. The petitioner is A-2. A-1 was arrested and remanded. It is further stated that the defacto complainant is doing contract work and he is a centering Engineer. On 08-06-2020 i.e., the date of occurrence, when the defacto complainant had got centering sheets 110 nos for doing construction work and had arranged the same in the place of occurrence. Thereafter at about 10.00 p.m., the owner of the building had seen the entire centering sheet and left to home and slept. Next day morning the defacto complainant had found those centering sheets were found missing and hence, he filed the complaint. During the course of investigation, the police had came to know that the offence was happened truly. Thereafter on receipt of information from secret informer, the respondent police had gone to Saravanampatti to Vellakinaru Road, near check post and doing vehicle checking. At that time, they found two persons were coming in two wheeler bearing Reg.No.TN 31 AD 7148 and had stopped them and enquired them. But they did not answer property. Thereafter the respondent police arrested them and after arrest, they gave confession and admitted the offence. Further in this case, stolen property has been recovered and except the present case, seven previous cases are pending against the accused. It is further stated that in this case, investigation is not yet completed and in the said circumstances, if the petitioner is released on bail, he may try to escape to some other district and hence, the prosecution raised objection to the petition.