DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Construction of 300 Mw Gas Power Plant at Kisiwa Village, Naumbu Ward in Mtwara District, Mtwara Region

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Construction of 300 Mw Gas Power Plant at Kisiwa Village, Naumbu Ward in Mtwara District, Mtwara Region ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF 300 MW GAS POWER PLANT AT KISIWA VILLAGE, NAUMBU WARD IN MTWARA DISTRICT, MTWARA REGION Developer Tanzania Electric Supply Company Limited (TANESCO) Umeme Park, Ubungo, P.O. Box 9024 Dar es Salaam Phone: +255 22 2451130/9 Fax: +255 22 2451206 Email: [email protected] Consultant Institute of Resource Assessment (IRA), University of Dar es Salaam P.O.BOX 35097 DAR ES SALAAM Tel+ 255 784 471 686 /+ 255 22 2410144 Fax+ 255 22 2410393 E-mail: [email protected] Submitted to: National Environmental Management Council (NEMC) P.O. Box 63154, Dar es Salaam Tel: +255 22 277 4889 Email: [email protected] Submission Date: 31 March 2020 300 MW MTWRA POWER PLANT TANESCO MARCH 2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Title and Location of the Project 300MW Combined Cycle Gas Turbine (CCGT) power plant at Kisiwa Village, Naumbu Ward, Mtwara District, Mtwara Region in Tanzania Project Proponent Tanzania Electric Supply Company Ltd (TANESCO) P.O. Box 9024 Umeme Park-Ubungo Dar es Salaam EIA Firm of Experts Institute of Resource Assessment (IRA), University of Dar es Salaam P.O. Box 35097 Dar es Salaam Introduction Tanzania’s economic growth triggered by changes in economic policies has prompted the demand for commercial energy in the country in particular electricity power. In order to meet increasing energy demand and maximize recently discovered offshore gas resources in the country, the Government of Tanzania through the Tanzania Electric Supply Company Ltd (TANESCO) is planning to install a 300MW Combined Cycle Gas Turbine (CCGT) power plant (the “Project”) in Kisiwa village in Mtwara District, Mtwara Region in Tanzania. The project is expected to increase availability and reliability of electricity supply through the addition of new power generation to the national grid. The Project will be funded by the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) and will be owned and operated by TANESCO. The ESIA study has been undertaken in accordance with the requirements of the Environmental Management Act, Cap 191 of 2004 and the Environmental Impact Assessment and Audit Regulations of 2005, which requires mandatory EIA to all energy development projects. This Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) report presents an assessment of the potential environmental and social impacts associated with the proposed Project. This report has been prepared for TANESCO and presents the objectives, methodology and outcomes of the ESIA study. Project Description The Project is located in Kisiwa Village in Mtwara District in Mtwara Region, 400km south of Dar es Salam, Tanzania. It will be located a part of the shore terrace of the Mambi River and in front of Kisiwa Bay (Sudi Creek). The Project Site will have an area of approximately 160 ha, which will be developed into a power complex. The proposed Mtwara power plant site will cover 300 MW MTWRA POWER PLANT TANESCO MARCH 2020 i approximately 37ha, which is a quarter of the Project Site. The area is allocated for power plant development according to the Mtwara Master Plan. The proposed configuration of the power plant is a Combined Cycle Gas Turbines (CCGT) Power Plant with 300 MW generation capacity. The plant configuration consist of one or two power blocks each consisting of two gas turbine generators (GTG x 2), two heat recovery steam generators (HRSG x 2) and one steam turbine generator (STG x1). The assumed capacity factor is 85.9%. The power plant is expected to have a plant service life time of 25 years is planned to be operated for 24 hours a day throughout a year. The operation of gas turbines generates power and steam which is collected by heat recovery system. The steam produced in heat recovery steam generators is led to a steam turbine which generate additional power. The power generated from gas turbine generators and steam turbine generators will be stepped up from the around 11 KV to 400kV by generator main transformers and connected to an adjacent 400kV substation, located within the Project site. The power plant will use natural gas as fuel. This will be supplied by the Tanzania Petroleum Development Corporation (TPDC) through a gas pipeline that connects to a gas valve station of the natural gas pipeline from Mnazi Bay to Dar es Salaam. The 16km gas pipeline that would connect to the Project will be developed exclusively for the Project. TPDC will be responsible for the new gas pipeline construction, management, operation and maintenance. The Project would require approximately 300m3/day of water supply. The proposed process water supply will be provided by the Mtwara Urban Water Supply and Sewerage Authority (MTUWASA). MTUWASA confirms that the current and planned wells in the area will be more than sufficient to supply Project requirements and water demand in Kisiwa village. Cooling water will be drawn from sea through a water intake facility. The power plant will have an onsite wastewater treatment facility. Treated wastewater will be discharged to Sudi Creek. Existing roads and tracks will be used for material transport. Besides upgrading and widening of existing roads for this purpose by Tanzania Rural and Urban Roads Agency (TARURA), a new access road, (approximately 700m) that connects the Project Site to the Kisiwa/Mgao Road, needs to be constructed. Environmental and Social Baseline Condition The Project Site is located beside Sudi Creek. It extends to the seashore, with a small area facing the seashore line (the “nose”). The nose area is currently being utilized as a mooring point of fishing boats. The open area behind the nose area has a combination of flat lowland and some highlands (up to 30m in elevation). In lowland areas, pastures, salt fields, and limited houses can be observed. Terrestrial vegetation in the Project Site consists mainly of coastal thickets and mangrove vegetation. Although these are in degraded state, two species are classified as vulnerable under IUCN Red List. Mangrove forests along the 300 MW MTWRA POWER PLANT TANESCO MARCH 2020 ii shore, are protected under Tanzanian law. The Project Site is not located within or close to protected areas and ecologically sensitive areas such nesting site for turtles or bird important areas. The marine environment within Sudi Creek and outside it (mouth portion) vary significantly. Fishes are found within Sudi Creek but the sea bottom is generally devoid of visible living fauna/flora (e.g. live corals, seaweeds), probably due to low dissolved oxygen levels and high turbidity of the water in the area. The sea bottom is dominated by very coarse sand, enriched with pebbles and shell fragments. On the contrary, a thriving marine environment with occasional sightings of some marine mammals, have been observed outside the mouth of Sudi Creek. The villages close to the Project Site are Kisiwa Village and Namgogoli Village, which are located at approximately 2-4km away. Majority of the villagers are involved in multiple economic activities, with agriculture as the primary economic activity. Although fishing is a common activity along the coast, few villagers are engaged in such activities. A family graveyard, consisting of over 50 graves, is located in between the nose and the Project Site. The relatives desire not to relocate the family graveyard. Also, certain parts of the Project Site used to be an archaeological excavation and study site, where Rich Iron Age pottery have been discovered. However, this area is not designated as a cultural heritage site under the Antiquities Act of 1979. Project stakeholders and their involvement in the EIA process At the beginning of the ESIA process, stakeholder identification was conducted to determine exactly who the stakeholders are and understand their priorities and objectives in relation to the proposed project. Stakeholders identified include relevant government agencies (central, regional and local levels), community groups and organizations, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and academic institutions, and international financing agencies. Consultation activities were undertaken by approaching the different levels of government down to villages. Meetings with relevant government agencies (e.g. Tanzania Forest Service, Marine Parks, Mtwara Port Authority), academic institutions (e.g. University of Dar es Salaam), and NGOs (e.g. Volunteer for Youth in Health and Development, Mtwara Society Against Poverty) were also conducted. Aside from these, focus group discussions were also conducted, targeting village elders and women’s group. The main objectives of stakeholder engagement activities include introducing the project and its potential impacts, and gathering concerns of the different stakeholder groups. To initiate the consultation process, prior information about the Project were shared through letters to the Regional Administrative offices of Mtwara region. The Regional Administrative Secretary allowed the consultants to proceed with consultation in Mtwara District Council. From Mtwara district, letters were prepared and sent to the wards and village leaders in Kisiwa and Namgogoli 300 MW MTWRA POWER PLANT TANESCO MARCH 2020 iii villages. Wards Executive officer in collaboration with village leaders informed the villagers to be prepared and attend the consultation meetings with the consultants. The first phase of consultations were undertaken during the full ESIA study in March 2018, during the scoping stage. The second phase of consultation was conducted during the full ESIA study from 8th – 17th August, 2018. As a result of several engagement and consultation activities, it has been identified that there is overall support for the Project from various stakeholders. Different groups, particularly local communities, expressed expectations such as employment opportunities, access to stable electricity supply, and potential improvement in social services. However, a number of issues and concerns were raised. In general, stakeholders highlighted the need for the project developer to properly implement compensation for land acquisition, pollution control and mitigation measures and to support communities that will be affected by the Project.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lessons Learned from Existing Biomass Power Plants February 2000 • NREL/SR-570-26946
    Lessons Learned from Existing Biomass Power Plants February 2000 • NREL/SR-570-26946 Lessons Learned from Existing Biomass Power Plants G. Wiltsee Appel Consultants, Inc. Valencia, California NREL Technical Monitor: Richard Bain Prepared under Subcontract No. AXE-8-18008 National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 NREL is a U.S. Department of Energy Laboratory Operated by Midwest Research Institute • Battelle • Bechtel Contract No. DE-AC36-99-GO10337 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or any agency thereof. Available electronically at http://www.doe.gov/bridge Available for a processing fee to U.S. Department of Energy and its contractors, in paper, from: U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information P.O. Box 62 Oak Ridge, TN 37831-0062 phone: 865.576.8401 fax: 865.576.5728 email: [email protected] Available for sale to the public, in paper, from: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Development and Progress As Historical Phenomena in Tanzania: “Maendeleo? We Had That in the Past”
    Development and Progress as Historical Phenomena in Tanzania: “Maendeleo? We Had That in the Past” Robert M. Ahearne Abstract: Academic discussions of development continue to grow, yet critical engagements with communities affected by development interventions remain limited. Drawing from life history interviews conducted in southern Tanzania, this article details the varied experiences of development interventions among older people and how these affect broader understandings of progress. Many juxtapose their negative views of ujamaa villagization with more positive recollections of previous interventions (especially the Groundnut Scheme), which are infused with what is described here as “development nostalgia.” Perceptions of the past clearly inform the social, political, and economic aspirations forwarded today, with the richness of the constructed narratives adding further nuance to existing depictions of Tanzanian historiography. Much of the academic work on the subject of development tends to focus on the present and the future, despite the fact that experiences from the past are crucial in shaping localized understandings of progress (Crewe & Harrison 1998). Drawing from in-depth fieldwork in southern Tanzania, this article aims to address a point raised twenty years ago by Jonathan Crush: that “we still do not know enough about the global, regional and especially local historical geography of development” (1995:8–9). Conventional histories of Tanzania, and of Tanzanian development, tend to offer teleological versions of the past, reflecting Kelly Askew’s (2006) threefold division of the presocialist, socialist, and postsocialist eras in recent Tanzanian history. Periodizations of history, of course, are “utterly relative constructs, [which] reflect their own sense of the ‘style’ of the historical past” (Toohey 2003:10).
    [Show full text]
  • FOREWORD the Lindi Municipality Is One of the Major Coastal Towns Of
    FOREWORD I wish to recognize and commend all stakeholders who in one way or another contributed to the completion of the preparation of this master plan, starting with the Lindi Municipal Council who were The Lindi Municipality is one of the major coastal towns of Tanzania and a transit centre from Dar es the mentors of the idea of preparing it and supervised its process as a planning authority, the Lindi Salaam to Mtwara and Songea regions, and the Republic of Mozambique through the Umoja Bridge in District Council who shared the preparation and agreed to include the Wards of Mchinga and Kiwalala Mtwara Region. The town is well-endowed with rich agricultural and other natural resources hinterland, on the plan, the World Bank who funded it, the Consultants (JAGBENS Planners &JMZ Landfields including, inter alia, cashewnut, coconut and the normal cereal crops. Salt farming and fishing are also Ltd), the Lindi Regional Administrative Secretariat, technical teams, the public and private institutions prominent in, around and outside the town. Livestock keeping, particularly cattle, sheep, goats and and individuals. I remain hopeful that this Master Plan will be used in good course and as a tool to poultry is an upcoming production activity. The region has 28percent of its land covered by Selous guide the sustainable development of Lindi town and the Wards of Mchinga and Kiwalala inLindi Game reserve and many natural forest reserves. When talking of the future prosperity of Lindi, one District. cannot overlook a planned establishment within the municipality; a giant LNG Plant proposed to commence in 2020/2021.
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Demographic and Socio-Economic Profile
    The United Republic of Tanzania Basic Demographic and Socio-Economic Profile National Bureau of Statistics Ministry of Finance Dar es Salaam and Office of Chief Government Statistician Ministry of State, President ‟s Office, State House and Good Governance Zanzibar April, 2014 UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA, ADMINISTRATIVE BOUNDARIES Basic Demographic and Socio-Economic Profile Foreword The 2012 Population and Housing Census (PHC) for the United Republic of Tanzania was carried out on the 26th August, 2012. This was the fifth Census after the Union of Tanganyika and Zanzibar in 1964. Other censuses were carried out in 1967, 1978, 1988 and 2002. The 2012 PHC, like previous censuses, will contribute to the improvement of quality of life of Tanzanians through the provision of current and reliable data for policy formulation, development planning and service delivery as well as for monitoring and evaluating national and international development frameworks. The 2012 PHC is unique as the collected information will be used in monitoring and evaluating the Development Vision 2025 for Tanzania Mainland and Zanzibar Development Vision 2020, Five Year Development Plan 2011/12–2015/16, National Strategy for Growth and Reduction of Poverty (NSGRP) commonly known as MKUKUTA and Zanzibar Strategy for Growth and Reduction of Poverty (ZSGRP) commonly known as MKUZA. The Census will also provide information for the evaluation of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) in 2015. The Poverty Monitoring Master Plan, which is the monitoring tool for NSGRP and ZSGRP, mapped out core indicators for poverty monitoring against the sequence of surveys, with the 2012 PHC being one of them. Several of these core indicators for poverty monitoring are measured directly from the 2012 PHC.
    [Show full text]
  • Cabo Ligado Mediafax
    OBSERVATORY CONFLICT CONFLICT CABO LIGADO 14 May 2021 Cabo Ligado Monthly: April 2021 Cabo Ligado — or ‘connected cape’ — is a Mozambique conflict observatory launched by ACLED, Zitamar News, and Mediafax. VITAL STATS • ACLED records 20 organized political violence events in April, resulting in 45 reported fatalities • The vast majority of incidents and fatalities recorded took place in Palma district, where the contest for control of Palma town and outlying areas continued throughout the month • Other events took place in Pemba, Macomia, and Muidumbe districts VITAL TRENDS • Over a month after the initial insurgent attack on Palma town on 24 March, the area around the town is still under threat from insurgents, with clashes reported on 30 April and into May • Attacks on the Macomia coast also continued in May, targeting fishermen pursuing their livelihoods in the area IN THIS REPORT • Analysis of the Tanzania’s role in the Cabo Delgado conflict in the wake of late President John Pombe Magufuli’s death and Samia Suluhu Hassan’s ascension to the Tanzanian presidency Evaluation of child vulnerability in Cabo Delgado following the first confirmed sightings of children under arms in insurgent operations. • Update on international involvement in the Cabo Delgado conflict with a focus on the proposed Southern African Development Community intervention that leaked in April APRIL SITUATION SUMMARY April 2021 was a relatively quiet month in the Cabo Delgado conflict, as both sides appeared to pause to evaluate their positions following the insurgent occupation of Palma town that ran from 24 March to 4 April. From the government’s perspective, the occupation was a disaster.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Intermittent Generation on the Economics and Operation Of
    Effects of Intermittent Generation on the Economics and Operation of Prospective Baseload Power Plants by Jordan Taylor Kearns B.S. Physics-Engineering, Washington & Lee University (2014) B.A. Politics, Washington & Lee University (2014) Submitted to the Institute for Data, Systems, & Society and the Department of Nuclear Science & Engineering in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degrees of Master of Science in Technology & Policy and Master of Science in Nuclear Science & Engineering at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY September 2017 c Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2017. All rights reserved. Author.................................................................................. Institute for Data, Systems, & Society Department of Nuclear Science & Engineering August 25, 2017 Certified by.............................................................................. Howard Herzog Senior Research Engineer, MIT Energy Initiative Executive Director, Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage Center Certified by.............................................................................. R. Scott Kemp Associate Professor of Nuclear Science & Engineering Director, MIT Laboratory for Nuclear Security & Policy Certified by.............................................................................. Sergey Paltsev Senior Research Scientist, MIT Energy Initiative Deputy Director, MIT Joint Program Accepted by............................................................................. Munther Dahleh William A. Coolidge
    [Show full text]
  • Implementation of Bio-CCS in Biofuels Production IEA Bioenergy Task 33 Special Report
    Implementation of bio-CCS in biofuels production IEA Bioenergy Task 33 special report IEA Bioenergy Task 33: 07 2018 Implementation of bio-CCS in biofuels production IEA Bioenergy Task 33 special project Authors: G. del Álamo (SINTEF Energy Research) J. Sandquist (SINTEF Energy Research) B.J. Vreugdenhil (ECN part of TNO) G. Aranda Almansa (ECN part of TNO) M. Carbo (ECN part of TNO) Front cover: STEPWISE unit for CO2 capture in Luleå (Sweden). The STEPWISE project that has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement No. 640769). Picture courtesy of E. van Dijk (ECN, part of TNO). Copyright © 2015 IEA Bioenergy. All rights Reserved ISBN 978-1-910154-44-1 Published by IEA Bioenergy IEA Bioenergy, also known as the Technology Collaboration Programme (TCP) for a Programme of Research, Development and Demonstration on Bioenergy, functions within a Framework created by the International Energy Agency (IEA). Views, findings and publications of IEA Bioenergy do not necessarily represent the views or policies of the IEA Secretariat or of its individual Member countries. Abstract In combination with other climate change mitigation options (renewable energy and energy efficiency), the implementation of CCS will be necessary to reach climate targets. If CCS is applied in with bioenergy processes (bio-CCS schemes), negative CO2 emissions can be potentially achieved. This study aims to provide an initial overview of the potential of biomass and waste gasification to contribute to carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) through the assessment of two example scenarios. The selected study cases (600 MWth thermal input) represent two different routes to biofuels production via gasification which cover a relevant range of gasification technologies, biofuel products and CCS infrastructure conditions: • Case 1: production of Fischer-Tropsch syncrude from high-temperature, entrained-flow gasification in Norway.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Collaboration Between East African Nations Via Transmission Interconnectors Eng
    Building Collaboration Between East African Nations via Transmission Interconnectors Eng. Christian M.A. Msyani Ag. DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR TRANSMISSION - TANESCO CONTENTS 1. TANESCO - Existing Power System Overview 2. Challenges 3. Transmission Projects on Expansion, Refurbishment And Maintenance. 4. Transmission Interconnectors Enabling Regional Power Trade 5. Solution to Grid System Losses 1.TANESCO – Transmission System Overview Quick Facts (By June 2015) . Customer Base 1,501,162 . Access To Electricity 38% . Connectivity: 28.7% . Electricity Consumption : 101 kWh/Person TANESCO - vertically integrated utility 100% owned by Government Generation Main Grid Installed Capacity Quick Facts: 1250MW 14.0% Grid System Peak 5.7% Load = 934.62MW 45% (Dec 2014) 15.1% Isolated Min-grids 20.2% Installed Capacity = 73.77MW Import = 13MW HYDRO-TANESCO GAS-TANESCO Annual Energy GAS-IPP LIQUID FUEL-TANESCO Demand (2014): LIQUID FUEL-IPPs/EEP 6,028.97GWh Transmission Transmission Voltage Level S/N Total Asset Name 220kv 132kv 66kv Transmission 4,905. 1 Line Route 1,593.5 580.0 2,732.4 9 Length (km) Circuit Segments 2 20 23 8 51 (Nos.) 3 Transmission Losses (%) 6.12 Number Of Grid With Total 2,985 4 41 Substations Capacity MVA 5 Optical Fiber Network Route Length (km) 2,025 Distribution System . 15,165 km of 33kV and 5,687 km of 11kV Lines . 40,822 km of LV ( 400V And 230V Lines). 12,340 Distribution Transformers . Distribution Losses: 11% 2. CHALLENGES S/N Challenge Mitigation 1. High Energy Losses Execution Of New Projects Due To Overloaded On Distributed Generation And Aging (Natural Gas, Coal And Renewables), Transmission Transmission And And Distribution.
    [Show full text]
  • Supporting Electricity Sector Reform in Libya
    FINAL REPORT (ISSUE 07A) Public Disclosure Authorized Supporting electricity sector reform in Libya TASK C: Institutional Development and Performance Improvement of GECOL Public Disclosure Authorized Report 4.2: IMPROVING GECOL TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized 14/12/2017 TASK C – REPORT 4.2: IMPROVING GECOL TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE Contents 1 Executive Summary ................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Generation .................................................................................................................. 7 1.2 Transmission .............................................................................................................. 12 1.3 Control ....................................................................................................................... 14 1.4 Medium Voltage ........................................................................................................ 16 1.5 Distribution ................................................................................................................ 17 2 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 19 3 Generation .............................................................................................................. 24 3.1 Current status ............................................................................................................ 24 3.1.1 Overview
    [Show full text]
  • Mtwara Region Investment Guide
    THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA PRESIDENT’S OFFICE REGIONAL ADMINISTRATION AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT MTWARA REGION INVESTMENT GUIDE The preparation of this guide was supported by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and the Economic and Social Research Foundation (ESRF) 182 Mzinga way/Msasani Road Oyesterbay P.O. Box 9182, Dar es Salaam Tel: (+255-22) 2195000 - 4 978 - 9987 - 664 - 11 - 5 E-mail: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Website: www.esrftz.or.tz Website: www.tz.undp.org MTWARA REGION INVESTMENT GUIDE | i TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................................v LIST OF FIGURES .....................................................................................................................................v ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS .............................................................................................vi FOREWORD ..............................................................................................................................................x EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................xii DISCLAIMER ..........................................................................................................................................xiv PART ONE: ...............................................................................................1 REASONS FOR INVESTING IN MTWARA
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Regulation and Economic Incentives of the Hybrid CSP HYSOL
    Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Oct 05, 2021 Analysis of regulation and economic incentives of the hybrid CSP HYSOL Baldini, Mattia; Pérez, Cristian Hernán Cabrera Publication date: 2016 Link back to DTU Orbit Citation (APA): Baldini, M., & Pérez, C. H. C. (2016). Analysis of regulation and economic incentives of the hybrid CSP HYSOL. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Analysis of regulation and economic incentives Deliverable nº: 6.4 July 2016 EC-GA nº: 308912 Project full title: Innovative Configuration for a Fully Renewable Hybrid CSP Plant WP: 6 Responsible partner: DTU-ME Authors: Mattia Baldini and Cristian Cabrera Dissemination level: Public D.6.4: Analysis of regulation and economic incentives Table of contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mtwara-Lindi Water Master Plan
    •EPUBLIC OF TANZANIA THE REPUBLIC OF FINLAND MTWARA-LINDI WATER MASTER PLAN REVISION Part: WATER SUPPLY VOLUME I MAIN REPORT April 1986 FINNWATER HELSINKI, FINLAN THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA THE REPUBLIC OF FINLAND MTWARA-LINDI WATER MASTER PLAN REVISION Part: WATER SUPPLY VOLUME I MAIN REPORT LIBRARY, INTERNATIONAL Rr-F CuNTtfE FOR COMMUNITY WA i ER SUPPLY AND SAf STATION (IRC) P.O. Bo;: ::,!90, 2509 AD The Hagu» Tel. (070) 814911 ext 141/142 RN: ^0 •'•'•' L0: ?u^ TZrnJ3(, April 1986 FINNWATER CONSULTING ENGINEEHS HELSINKI , FINLAND MTWARA-LINDI WATER MASTER PLAN REVISION WATER SUPPLY DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1986 - 2001 VOLUME 1 MAIN REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 3 3 SUMMARY 4 4 GENERAL BACKGROUND INFORMATION 7 5 WATER MASTER PLAN 1977 11 6 WATER SUPPLY SITUATION IN 1975 14 7 WATER SUPPLY DEVELOPMENT 1976-1984 16 7.1 Construction of Water Supplies 16 7.2 Mtwara-Lindi Rural Water Supply 17 Project 8 PRESENT SITUATION 19 8.1 Investigations 19 8.2 Water Supply Situation in 1984 20 8.3 Comparison between 1975 and 1984 22 8.4 Water Supply Management 22 8.41 Organization 22 8.42 Staff 25 8.43 Facilities and Equipment 26 8.5 Financing 26 8.6 Problems 28 9 WATER RESOURCES REVIEW 29 9.1 Surface Water 29 9.2 Groundwater 31 10 WATER DEMAND 34 10.1 Population 34 10.2 Livestock 41 10.3 Institutions and Industries 43 10.4 Unit Water Demand 46 10.5 Water Demand 48 Page 11 PLANNING CRITERIA 50 11.1 General 50 11.2 Planning Horizon 50 11.3 Service Standards 50 11.4 Water Quality 51 11.5 Technology 52 11.6 Institutional Aspects 52 11.7 Financial Aspects 53 11.8 Priority Ranking 54 12 WATER SUPPLY METHODS 55 12.1 Piped Water Supplies -.
    [Show full text]