DOCSLIB.ORG

New Horizons SOC to Instrument Pipeline ICD

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
New Horizons SOC to Instrument Pipeline ICD New Horizons SOC to Instrument Pipeline ICD September 2017 SwRI® Project 05310 Document No. 05310-SOCINST-01 Contract NASW-02008 Prepared by SOUTHWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE® Space Science and Engineering Division 6220 Culebra Road, San Antonio, Texas 78228-0510 (210) 684-5111 FAX (210) 647-4325 Southwest Research Institute 05310-SOCINST-01 Rev 0 Chg 0 New Horizons SOC to Instrument Pipeline ICD Page ii New Horizons SOC to Instrument Pipeline ICD SwRI Project 05310 Document No. 05310-SOCINST-01 Contract NASW-02008 Prepared by: Joe Peterson 08 November 2013 Revised by: Brian Carcich August, 2014 Revised by: Tiffany Finley March, 2016 Revised by: Tiffany Finley October, 2016 Revised by: Brian Carcich December, 2016 Revised by: Tiffany Finley, Brian Carcich, PEPSSI team April, 2017 Revised by: Tiffany Finley, PEPSSI team September, 2017 Contributors: ALICE specifics prepared by: Maarten Versteeg, Joel Parker, & Andrew Steffl LEISA specifics prepared by: George McCabe & Allen Lunsford LORRI specifics prepared by: Hal Weaver & Howard Taylor MVIC specifics prepared by: Cathy Olkin PEPSSI specifics prepared by: Stefano Livi, Matthew Hill, Lawrence Brown, & Peter Kollman REX specifics prepared by: Ivan Linscott & Brian Carcich SDC specifics prepared by: David James SWAP specifics prepared by: Heather Elliott Southwest Research Institute 05310-SOCINST-01 Rev 0 Chg 0 New Horizons SOC to Instrument Pipeline ICD Page iii General Approval Signatures: Approved by: ____________________________________ Date: ____________ Hal Weaver, JHU/APL, Project Scientist Approved by: Leslie Young via email 1 December 2005 SwRI, Deputy Project Scientist Approved by: John Andrews via email 4 December 2005 SwRI, SOC Project Manager Instrument-specific Signatures: (Science Theme Teams members) Approved by: ____________________________________ Date: ____________ Jeff Moore, NASA, GGI Science Theme Team Lead (applies to MVIC, LORRI) Approved by: /s/ Dale Cruikshank via email 6 March 2006 NASA, COMP Science Theme Team Lead (applies to LEISA) Approved by: Randy Gladstone via email 6 December 2005 SwRI, ATM Science Theme Team Lead (applies to ALICE, REX) Approved by: /s/ Fran Bagenal via email 23 January 2006 CU, P&P Science Theme Team Lead (applies to SWAP, PEPSSI, SDC)) Southwest Research Institute 05310-SOCINST-01 Rev 0 Chg 0 New Horizons SOC to Instrument Pipeline ICD Page iv (Instrument PIs & Scientists) Approved by: Alan Stern via email 5 December 2005 SwRI, ALICE Instrument PI Approved by: Dave Slater via email 2 December 2005 SwRI, ALICE Instrument Scientist Approved by: Alan Stern via email 5 December 2005 SwRI, ALICE Instrument PI Approved by: Dennis Reuter via email 5 December 2005 NASA, LEISA Instrument Scientist Approved by: ____________________________________ Date: ____________ Andy Cheng, JHU/APL, LORRI Instrument PI Approved by: ____________________________________ Date: ____________ Hal Weaver, JHU/APL, LORRI Instrument Scientist Approved by: Alan Stern via email 5 December 2005 SwRI, ALICE Instrument PI Approved by: Dennis Reuter via email 5 December 2005 NASA, LEISA Instrument Scientist Southwest Research Institute 05310-SOCINST-01 Rev 0 Chg 0 New Horizons SOC to Instrument Pipeline ICD Page v Approved by: ____________________________________ Date: ____________ Ralph McNutt, JHU/APL, PEPSSI Instrument PI Approved by: ____________________________________ Date: ____________ Stefano Livi, JHU/APL, PEPSSI Instrument Scientist Approved by: /s/ Len Tyler via email 8 March 2006 Stanford, REX Instrument PI Approved by: /s/ Ivan Linscott via email 8 March 2006 Stanford, REX Instrument Scientist Approved by: ____________________________________ Date: ____________ Mihaly Horanyi, CU, SDC Instrument PI Approved by: ____________________________________ Date: ____________ Mihaly Horanyi, CU, SDC Instrument Scientist Approved by: Dave McComas via email 12 December 2005 SwRI, SWAP Instrument PI Approved by: Heather Elliot via email 8 March 2006 SwRI, SWAP Instrument Scientist Release to Document Control: Approved by: ____________________________________ Date: ____________ TBD, SwRI Project CM Southwest Research Institute 05310-SOCINST-01 Rev 0 Chg 0 New Horizons SOC to Instrument Pipeline ICD Page vi TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. SCOPE............................................................................................................................1 2. SIGNATURES, AUTHORSHIP, AND RESPONSIBILITY.........................................1 3. APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS......................................................................................1 3.1 New Horizons Documents.........................................................................................1 4. INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................1 5. INTERFACE DESCRIPTION........................................................................................3 6. REQUIREMENTS..........................................................................................................4 6.1 Level 2 (output) Files.................................................................................................4 6.2 Pointing Information..................................................................................................5 6.3 The Code....................................................................................................................5 6.4 Calibration Data.........................................................................................................6 6.5 Documentation...........................................................................................................6 6.6 Error Conditions and Integration Troubleshooting....................................................7 6.7 PDS Archiving...........................................................................................................7 6.8 Configuration Management.......................................................................................7 6.9 Pipeline Updates........................................................................................................7 6.10 Acceptance Review..................................................................................................7 6.11 Longevity.................................................................................................................8 7. ALICE INSTRUMENT DESCRIPTION.......................................................................9 7.1 Overview....................................................................................................................9 7.2 “Raw” Data Specifics..............................................................................................10 7.3 “Calibrated” Data Specifics.....................................................................................17 8. LEISA INSTRUMENT DESCRIPTION.....................................................................21 8.1 Overview..................................................................................................................21 8.2 Data Specifics..........................................................................................................22 8.3 Calibrated Data Specifics.........................................................................................26 9. LORRI INSTRUMENT DESCRIPTION.....................................................................33 9.1 Overview..................................................................................................................33 9.2 Raw image Specifics................................................................................................34 9.3 Calibrated Image Specifics......................................................................................36 9.4 References................................................................................................................56 Southwest Research Institute 05310-SOCINST-01 Rev 0 Chg 0 New Horizons SOC to Instrument Pipeline ICD Page vii 10. MVIC INSTRUMENT DESCRIPTION:...................................................................58 10.1 Overview................................................................................................................58 10.2 Level 1 Specifics....................................................................................................62 10.3 Level 2 Specifics....................................................................................................66 11. PEPSSI INSTRUMENT DESCRIPTION..................................................................76 11.1 Overview................................................................................................................76 11.2 Introduction to PEPSSI Data................................................................................81 11.3 Level 1 Specifics....................................................................................................86 11.4 Level 2 Specifics....................................................................................................87 12. REX INSTRUMENT DESCRIPTION.....................................................................110 12.1 Overview..............................................................................................................110 12.2 Raw Data Specifics..............................................................................................112 12.3 Calibration Specifics............................................................................................121
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Juno Telecommunications
    The cover The cover is an artist’s conception of Juno in orbit around Jupiter.1 The photovoltaic panels are extended and pointed within a few degrees of the Sun while the high-gain antenna is pointed at the Earth. 1 The picture is titled Juno Mission to Jupiter. See http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/details.php?id=PIA13087 for the cover art and an accompanying mission overview. DESCANSO Design and Performance Summary Series Article 16 Juno Telecommunications Ryan Mukai David Hansen Anthony Mittskus Jim Taylor Monika Danos Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California October 2012 This research was carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not constitute or imply endorsement by the United States Government or the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology. Copyright 2012 California Institute of Technology. Government sponsorship acknowledged. DESCANSO DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE SUMMARY SERIES Issued by the Deep Space Communications and Navigation Systems Center of Excellence Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Joseph H. Yuen, Editor-in-Chief Published Articles in This Series Article 1—“Mars Global
    [Show full text]
  • Submission Completed
    Your abstract submission has been received Print this page You have submitted the following abstract to GSA Annual Meeting in Denver, Colorado, USA - 2016. Receipt of this notice does not guarantee that your submission was complete or free of errors. PLUTO IS THE NEW MARS! MOORE, Jeffrey M.1, MCKINNON, William B.2, SPENCER, John R.3, HOWARD, Alan D.4, GRUNDY, William M.5, STERN, S. Alan3, WEAVER, Harold A.6, YOUNG, Leslie A.3, ENNICO, Kimberly1 and OLKIN, Cathy3, (1)NASA Ames Research Center, Space Science Division, MS-245-3, Moffett Field, CA 95129, (2)Washington University, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences and McDonnell Center for the Space Sciences, One Brookings Drive, Saint Louis, MO 63130, (3)Southwest Research Institute, Boulder, CO 80302, (4)Department of Environmental Sciences, Univerisity of Virginia, PO Box 400123, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4123, (5)Lowell Observatory, Flagstaff, AZ 86001, (6)Applied Physics Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University, Laurel, MD 20723, [email protected] Data from NASA’s New Horizons encounter with Pluto in July 2015 revealed an astoundingly complex world. The surface seen on the encounter hemisphere ranged in age from ancient to recent. A vast craterless plain of slowly convecting solid nitrogen resides in a deep primordial impact basin, reminiscent of young enigmatic deposits in Mars’ Hellas basin. Like Mars, regions of Pluto are dominated by valleys, though the Pluto valleys are thought to be carved by nitrogen glaciers. Pluto has fretted terrain and halo craters. Pluto is cut by tectonics of several different ages. Like Mars, vast tracts on Pluto are mantled by dust and volatiles.
    [Show full text]
  • New Horizons Pluto/KBO Mission Impact Hazard
    New Horizons Pluto/KBO Mission Impact Hazard Hal Weaver NH Project Scientist The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory Outline • Background on New Horizons mission • Description of Impact Hazard problem • Impact Hazard mitigation – Hubble Space Telescope plays a key role New Horizons: To Pluto and Beyond The Initial Reconnaissance of The Solar System’s “Third Zone” KBOs Pluto-Charon Jupiter System 2016-2020 July 2015 Feb-March 2007 Launch Jan 2006 PI: Alan Stern (SwRI) PM: JHU Applied Physics Lab New Horizons is NASA’s first New Frontiers Mission Frontier of Planetary Science Explore a whole new region of the Solar System we didn’t even know existed until the 1990s Pluto is no longer an outlier! Pluto System is prototype of KBOs New Horizons gives the first close-up view of these newly discovered worlds New Horizons Now (overhead view) NH Spacecraft & Instruments 2.1 meters Science Team: PI: Alan Stern Fran Bagenal Rick Binzel Bonnie Buratti Andy Cheng Dale Cruikshank Randy Gladstone Will Grundy Dave Hinson Mihaly Horanyi Don Jennings Ivan Linscott Jeff Moore Dave McComas Bill McKinnon Ralph McNutt Scott Murchie Cathy Olkin Carolyn Porco Harold Reitsema Dennis Reuter Dave Slater John Spencer Darrell Strobel Mike Summers Len Tyler Hal Weaver Leslie Young Pluto System Science Goals Specified by NASA or Added by New Horizons New Horizons Resolution on Pluto (Simulations of MVIC context imaging vs LORRI high-resolution "noodles”) 0.1 km/pix The Best We Can Do Now 0.6 km/pix HST/ACS-PC: 540 km/pix New Horizons Science Status •
    [Show full text]
  • New Horizons: Reconnaissance of the Pluto-Charon System and The
    C.T. Russell Editor New Horizons Reconnaissance of the Pluto-Charon System and the Kuiper Belt Previously published in Space Science Reviews Volume 140, Issues 1–4, 2008 C.T. Russell Institute of Geophysics & Planetary Physics University of California Los Angeles, CA, USA Cover illustration: NASA’s New Horizons spacecraft was launched on 2006 January 19, received a grav- ity assist during a close approach to Jupiter on 2007 February 28, and is now headed for a flyby with closest approach 12,500 km from the center of Pluto on 2015 July 14. This artist’s depiction shows the spacecraft shortly after passing above Pluto’s highly variegated surface, which may have black-streaked surface deposits produced from cryogenic geyser activity, and just before passing into Pluto’s shadow when solar and earth occultation experiments will probe Pluto’s tenuous, and possibly hazy, atmosphere. Sunlit crescents of Pluto’s moons Charon, Nix, and Hydra are visible in the background. After flying through the Pluto system, the New Horizons spacecraft could be re-targeted towards other Kuiper Belt Objects in an extended mission phase. This image is based on an original painting by Dan Durda. © Dan Durda 2001 All rights reserved. Back cover illustration: The New Horizons spacecraft was launched aboard an Atlas 551 rocket from the NASA Kennedy Space Center on 2008 January 19 at 19:00 UT. Library of Congress Control Number: 2008944238 DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-89518-5 ISBN-978-0-387-89517-8 e-ISBN-978-0-387-89518-5 Printed on acid-free paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Juno Observations in Jupiter's Plasma Disk: Density
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Survey of Juno Observations in Jupiter's Plasma Disk: 10.1029/2021JA029446 Density Key Points: E. Huscher1, F. Bagenal1 , R. J. Wilson1 , F. Allegrini2,3 , R. W. Ebert2,3 , P. W. Valek2 , • On most orbits, the densities exhibit J. R. Szalay4 , D. J. McComas4 , J. E. P. Connerney5,6 , S. Bolton2 , and S. M. Levin7 regular behavior mapping out a disk confined close to the centrifugal 1Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA, 2Southwest Research equator 3 • Small-scale ( minutes) variabilities Institute, San Antonio, TX, USA, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Texas at San Antonio, San 4 5 may indicate∼ radial transport via Antonio, TX, USA, Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA, Space Research local instabilities Corporation, Annapolis, MD, USA, 6Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA, 7Jet Propulsion Laboratory/ • Occasionally a uniformly tenuous California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA outer disk indicates enhanced losses, perhaps triggered by solar wind compression Abstract We explore the variation in plasma conditions through the middle magnetosphere of Jupiter with latitude and radial distance using Juno-JADE measurements of plasma density (electrons, protons, Supporting Information: sulfur, and oxygen ions) surveyed on Orbits 5–26 between March 2017 and April 2020. On most orbits, the Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article. densities exhibit regular behavior, mapping out a disk between 10 and 50 RJ (Jovian radii). In the disk, the heavy ions are confined close to the centrifugal equator which oscillates relative to the spacecraft due to the 10° tilt of Jupiter's magnetic dipole.
    [Show full text]
  • + New Horizons
    Media Contacts NASA Headquarters Policy/Program Management Dwayne Brown New Horizons Nuclear Safety (202) 358-1726 [email protected] The Johns Hopkins University Mission Management Applied Physics Laboratory Spacecraft Operations Michael Buckley (240) 228-7536 or (443) 778-7536 [email protected] Southwest Research Institute Principal Investigator Institution Maria Martinez (210) 522-3305 [email protected] NASA Kennedy Space Center Launch Operations George Diller (321) 867-2468 [email protected] Lockheed Martin Space Systems Launch Vehicle Julie Andrews (321) 853-1567 [email protected] International Launch Services Launch Vehicle Fran Slimmer (571) 633-7462 [email protected] NEW HORIZONS Table of Contents Media Services Information ................................................................................................ 2 Quick Facts .............................................................................................................................. 3 Pluto at a Glance ...................................................................................................................... 5 Why Pluto and the Kuiper Belt? The Science of New Horizons ............................... 7 NASA’s New Frontiers Program ........................................................................................14 The Spacecraft ........................................................................................................................15 Science Payload ...............................................................................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • The Suitability of Quantum Magnetometers for Defence Applications
    The Suitability of Quantum Magnetometers for Defence Applications UDT 2019 - 14th May 2019 Andrew Bond and Leighton Brown Presented by Nick Sheppard © Thales UK Limited 2019 The copyright herein is the property of Thales UK Limited. It is not to be reproduced, modified, adapted, published, translated in any material form (including storage in any medium by electronic means whether or not transiently or incidentally), in whole or in part nor disclosed to any third party without the prior written permission of Thales UK Limited. Neither shall it be used otherwise than for the purpose for which it is supplied. The information contained herein is confidential and, subject to any rights of third parties, is proprietary to Thales UK Limited. It is intended only for the authorised recipient for the intended purpose, and access to it by any other person is unauthorised. The information contained herein may not be disclosed to any third party or used for any other purpose without the express written permission of Thales UK Limited. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not disclose, copy, circulate or in any other way use or rely on the information contained in this document. Such unauthorised use may be unlawful. If you have received this document in error, please inform Thales UK Limited immediately on +44 (0)118 9434500 and post it, together with your name and address, to The Intellectual Property Department, Thales UK Limited, 350 Longwater Avenue, Green Park, Reading RG2 6GF. Postage will be refunded. www.thalesgroup.com OPEN Quantum Devices ▌Quantum technologies are beginning to move out of laboratory environments and into industrial applications.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Atmosphere of Pluto As Observed by New Horizons G
    The Atmosphere of Pluto as Observed by New Horizons G. Randall Gladstone,1,2* S. Alan Stern,3 Kimberly Ennico,4 Catherine B. Olkin,3 Harold A. Weaver,5 Leslie A. Young,3 Michael E. Summers,6 Darrell F. Strobel,7 David P. Hinson,8 Joshua A. Kammer,3 Alex H. Parker,3 Andrew J. Steffl,3 Ivan R. Linscott,9 Joel Wm. Parker,3 Andrew F. Cheng,5 David C. Slater,1† Maarten H. Versteeg,1 Thomas K. Greathouse,1 Kurt D. Retherford,1,2 Henry Throop,7 Nathaniel J. Cunningham,10 William W. Woods,9 Kelsi N. Singer,3 Constantine C. C. Tsang,3 Rebecca Schindhelm,3 Carey M. Lisse,5 Michael L. Wong,11 Yuk L. Yung,11 Xun Zhu,5 Werner Curdt,12 Panayotis Lavvas,13 Eliot F. Young,3 G. Leonard Tyler,9 and the New Horizons Science Team 1Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, TX 78238, USA 2University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA 3Southwest Research Institute, Boulder, CO 80302, USA 4National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Ames Research Center, Space Science Division, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA 5The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD 20723, USA 6George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA 7The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA 8Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence Institute, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA 9Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA 10Nebraska Wesleyan University, Lincoln, NE 68504 11California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 12Max-Planck-Institut für Sonnensystemforschung, 37191 Katlenburg-Lindau, Germany 13Groupe de Spectroscopie Moléculaire et Atmosphérique, Université Reims Champagne-Ardenne, 51687 Reims, France *To whom correspondence should be addressed.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018: Aiaa-Space-Report
    AIAA TEAM SPACE TRANSPORTATION DESIGN COMPETITION TEAM PERSEPHONE Submitted By: Chelsea Dalton Ashley Miller Ryan Decker Sahil Pathan Layne Droppers Joshua Prentice Zach Harmon Andrew Townsend Nicholas Malone Nicholas Wijaya Iowa State University Department of Aerospace Engineering May 10, 2018 TEAM PERSEPHONE Page I Iowa State University: Persephone Design Team Chelsea Dalton Ryan Decker Layne Droppers Zachary Harmon Trajectory & Propulsion Communications & Power Team Lead Thermal Systems AIAA ID #908154 AIAA ID #906791 AIAA ID #532184 AIAA ID #921129 Nicholas Malone Ashley Miller Sahil Pathan Joshua Prentice Orbit Design Science Science Science AIAA ID #921128 AIAA ID #922108 AIAA ID #761247 AIAA ID #922104 Andrew Townsend Nicholas Wijaya Structures & CAD Trajectory & Propulsion AIAA ID #820259 AIAA ID #644893 TEAM PERSEPHONE Page II Contents 1 Introduction & Problem Background2 1.1 Motivation & Background......................................2 1.2 Mission Definition..........................................3 2 Mission Overview 5 2.1 Trade Study Tools..........................................5 2.2 Mission Architecture.........................................6 2.3 Planetary Protection.........................................6 3 Science 8 3.1 Observations of Interest.......................................8 3.2 Goals.................................................9 3.3 Instrumentation............................................ 10 3.3.1 Visible and Infrared Imaging|Ralph............................ 11 3.3.2 Radio Science Subsystem.................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Pickup Ion-Mediated Solar Wind
    The Astrophysical Journal, 869:23 (21pp), 2018 December 10 https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aaebfe © 2018. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. The Pickup Ion-mediated Solar Wind G. P. Zank1,2 , L. Adhikari1 , L.-L. Zhao1 , P. Mostafavi2,3 , E. J. Zirnstein3 , and D. J. McComas3 1 Center for Space Plasma and Aeronomic Research (CSPAR), University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL 35805, USA 2 Department of Space Science, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL 35899, USA 3 Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA Received 2018 September 10; revised 2018 October 22; accepted 2018 October 24; published 2018 December 7 Abstract The New Horizons Solar Wind Around Pluto (NH SWAP) instrument has provided the first direct observations of interstellar H+ and He+ pickup ions (PUIs) at distances between ∼11.26 and 38 au in the solar wind. The observations demonstrate that the distant solar wind beyond the hydrogen ionization cavity is indeed mediated by PUIs. The creation of PUIs modifies the underlying low-frequency turbulence field responsible for their own scattering. The dissipation of these low-frequency fluctuations serves to heat the solar wind plasma, and accounts for the observed non-adiabatic solar wind temperature profile and a possible slow temperature increase beyond ∼30 au. We develop a very general theoretical model that incorporates PUIs, solar wind thermal plasma, the interplanetary magnetic field, and low-frequency turbulence to describe the evolution of the large-scale solar wind, PUIs, and turbulence from 1–84 au, the structure of the perpendicular heliospheric termination shock, and the transmission of turbulence into the inner heliosheath, extending the classical models of Holzer and Isenberg.
    [Show full text]
  • DOE Could Improve Planning and Communication Related to Plutonium-238 And
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters September 2017 SPACE EXPLORATION DOE Could Improve Planning and Communication Related to Plutonium- 238 and Radioisotope Power Systems Production Challenges Accessible Version GAO-17-673 September 2017 SPACE EXPLORATION DOE Could Improve Planning and Communication Related to Plutonium-238 and Radioisotope Power Systems Production Challenges Highlights of GAO-17-673, a report to congressional requesters Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found NASA uses RPS to generate electrical The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) selects radioisotope power in missions in which solar power systems (RPS) for missions primarily based on the agency’s scientific panels or batteries would be objectives and mission destinations. Prior to the establishment of the Department ineffective. RPS convert heat of Energy’s (DOE) Supply Project in fiscal year 2011 to produce new plutonium- generated by the radioactive decay of 238 (Pu-238), NASA officials said that Pu-238 supply was a limiting factor in Pu-238 into electricity. DOE maintains selecting RPS-powered missions. After the initiation of the Supply Project, a capability to produce RPS for NASA however, NASA officials GAO interviewed said that missions are selected missions, as well as a limited and independently of decisions on how to power them. Once a mission is selected, aging supply of Pu-238 that will be NASA considers power sources early in its mission review process. Multiple depleted in the 2020s, according to NASA and DOE officials and factors could affect NASA’s demand for RPS and Pu-238. For example, high documentation. With NASA funding, costs associated with RPS and missions can affect the demand for RPS DOE initiated the Pu-238 Supply because, according to officials, NASA’s budget can only support one RPS Project in 2011, with a goal of mission about every 4 years.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the New Horizons Spacecraft Glen H. Fountain, David Y
    The New Horizons Spacecraft Glen H. Fountain, David Y. Kusnierkiewicz, Christopher B. Hersman, Timothy S. Herder, Thomas B Coughlin, William T. Gibson, Deborah A. Clancy, Christopher C. DeBoy, T. Adrian Hill, James D. Kinnison, Douglas S. Mehoke, Geffrey K. Ottman, Gabe D. Rogers, S. Alan Stern, James M. Stratton, Steven R. Vernon, Stephen P. Williams Abstract The New Horizons spacecraft was launched on January 19, 2006. The spacecraft was designed to provide a platform for the seven instruments designated by the science team to collect and return data from Pluto in 2015 that would meet the requirements established by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Announcement of Opportunity AO-OSS-01. The design drew on heritage from previous missions developed at The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (APL) and other NASA missions such as Ulysses. The trajectory design imposed constraints on mass and structural strength to meet the high launch acceleration consistent with meeting the AO requirement of returning data prior to the year 2020. The spacecraft subsystems were designed to meet tight resource allocations (mass and power) yet provide the necessary control and data handling finesse to support data collection and return when the one way light time during the Pluto fly-by is 4.5 hours. Missions to the outer regions of the solar system (where the solar irradiance is 1/1000 of the level near the Earth) require a Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator (RTG) to supply electrical power. One RTG was available for use by New Horizons. To accommodate this constraint, the spacecraft electronics were designed to operate on less than 200 W.
    [Show full text]