Ahmed Vâsıf Efendi (Ca

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ahmed Vâsıf Efendi (Ca An Ottoman Historian in an Age of Reform: Ahmed Vâsıf Efendi (ca. 1730–1806) by Ethan Lewis Menchinger A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Near Eastern Studies) in the University of Michigan 2014 Doctoral Committee: Associate Professor Gottfried J. Hagen, Chair Professor Virginia H. Aksan, McMaster University Professor Michael D. Bonner Professor Rudi P. Lindner © Ethan Lewis Menchinger 2014 This dissertation is dedicated to my family, who never once questioned the wisdom of a career in history. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This study has been made possible through the largesse and generous aid of a number of institutions. I am grateful firstly to the Department of Near Eastern Studies and the Rackham School of Graduate Studies, University of Michigan, for funding the bulk of my overseas research; a 2013/14 Rackham Pre-doctoral Fellowship freed me from the necessity of teaching and gave me the unwonted luxury of an entire year of uninterrupted writing. I also owe a deep debt to staff at the Robarts and Thomas Fisher Rare Book Libraries in Toronto, the Hatcher Graduate Library in Ann Arbor, the Österreichische Nationalbibliothek in Vienna, the Newberry Library in Chicago, the American Research Institute in Turkey, and to those at the Başbakanlık Osmanlı Arşivleri, Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Beyazıt Devlet Kütüphanesi, and Millet Kütüphanesi in Istanbul for cheerfully meeting my requests for often recondite materials. I have been fortunate as a junior scholar to have the support of excellent teachers, foremost among whom are my committee members. Gottfried Hagen and Virginia Aksan have been fonts of wisdom and patience throughout my time in Near Eastern Studies and fostered this project, consciously and unconsciously, through their guidance, mentoring, and inspiration. My professional formation owes largely to their influence and to the rare opportunities they have afforded me; Virginia also allowed me access to her personal library and to manuscripts otherwise inaccessible. I am grateful as well to Rudi Lindner for sharing his profound historical sensibility and insight into Ottoman history, for his faith in me, and for his timely and sage advice, offered in his usual self-deprecating way. Michael Bonner agreed to sit on this committee, iii I think, with little idea of what the project might entail. He has consistently asked the difficult questions that had to be asked. No lesser thanks must go to Professors Kemal Beydilli, Mustafa Bilge, and Seyfi Kenan at the İslâm Araştırmaları Merkezi (İSAM) in Istanbul, who welcomed a foreign graduate student and shared their hospitality, advice, and authoritative knowledge of Vâsıf and the sources. Kemal Bey, like Professor Aksan, kindly provided key files that have made this study possible. I am further indebted to my colleagues in Turkey, especially Günhan Börekçi and Kahraman Şakul at İstanbul Şehir Üniversitesi and Aysel Yıldız, who, in addition to help and suggestions, made my research experience companionable and pleasurable. There are a great number of teachers, colleagues, and friends to whom I am grateful and without whom, whether they know it or not, I could never have completed this work. I especially wish to thank: Remzi Bilgin, Deborah Black, Wendy Burr, Margaret Casazza, Kate Creasey, Semi Ertan, Özgen Felek, Noah Gardiner, Rob Haug, Gina Konstantopoulos, Evyn Kropf, Joo- Yup Lee, Nancy Linthicum, Derek Mancini-Lander, Victor Ostapchuk, Haluk Otman, Metin Bayraktaroğlu, Maxim Romanov, Veysel Şimşek, Ali Sipahi, and Will Smiley. Especial thanks to my colleague and friend Frank Castiglione for making graduate study much easier to bear; and to my in-laws Máмa, Бáтько, and Larissa for welcoming me into their family. This dissertation is dedicated to my family: to Dad, Mom, Stefan, Olivia, and my extended family, who have always supported me no matter how strange my choice of vocation might have seemed. Lastly, my wife Natalia’s encouragement has sustained me for years and seen this project from its inchoate beginnings many years ago to its end. I thank God for her love every day. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Dedication ii Acknowledgements iii List of Abbreviations viii Glossary ix Note on Transliteration xi Introduction 1 Ahmed Vâsıf: His World and Corpus 2 Chapter One: History as Magistra Vitae: 12 Ahmed Vâsıf's Life and Work a. A Portrait of an Eighteenth Century Historian 12 b. Vâsıf and the Practice of History 34 c. History Defined 39 d. History and Knowledge 42 e. History and Morality 48 f. Criticism and Self-Praise 53 g. Conclusions: Vâsıf and the Post of Court Historian 60 Chapter Two: Ahmed Vâsıf on Agency and Causality: 63 a “Reformist” Philosophy of History a. Ottoman Exceptionalism and the Problem of Causality 64 b. The 1784 Risâle 71 v c. Vâsıf on the Natural and Supernatural 80 d. The 1787-1792 War: the Morality of Victory and Defeat 85 e. The 1798 Tesliyetnâme: a Theodicy 91 f. Refuting the Rabble: Polemic and Reform 96 g. Final Chronicles 101 h. Conclusions 110 Chapter Three: Sheathing the Sword of Enmity: 112 Vâsıf on Peace and Peacemaking a. Ottoman Views of War and Peace 113 b. Defenses of Peace: 1.b. Karlowitz 117 2.b. The Early Eighteenth Century 122 3.b. Küçük Kaynarca 124 c. Vâsıf on Peace: 1.c. The Crimean Crisis and the “Lesser of Two Evils” 129 2.c. The Maçin Boycott, 1791 141 2.c. Küçük Kaynarca: “War is Unpredictable” 148 d. Conclusions 157 Chapter Four: the Moral Order of the Universe 159 a. Human Nature and Social Order in Ottoman Thought 160 b. Ahmed Vâsıf and World Order 170 c. Practical Philosophy as Governance 178 d. Governance of the Self: Virtue and Vice 183 e. Governance of the Polity: Ottoman Political Thought 194 vi f. Vâsıf on the Ideal Ruler, Politics, and Proper Rule 200 g. Conclusions 212 Chapter Five: Eighteenth Century Ottoman Reform 214 a. “World Order” and the Problem of Reform 215 b. Reform as Restoration: the 1770s and 1780s 223 c. Nizâm-ı Cedîd: Reform under Selim III 233 1.c. The Meaning of Nizâm-ı Cedîd 235 2.c. Reform and its Discontents 239 d. Ahmed Vâsıf on the “New Order” 248 Epilogue: Vâsıf and Ottoman Intellectual History 263 Bibliography 269 vii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AE Ali Emiri A.RSK.d Bâb-ı Asâfî, Rüûs Kalemi Defterleri BOA Başbakanlık Osmanlı Arşivleri, Istanbul C.DH Cevdet Dahiliyye D.BŞM.d Bâb-ı Defterî, Başmuhâsebe Kalemi Defterleri DİA Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslâm Ansiklopedisi EI² Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd edition GOW Babinger, Die Geschichtsschreiber der Osmanen und ihre Werke HAT Hatt-ı Hümâyûn İA İslâm Ansiklopedisi İÜ İstanbul Üniversitesi Kütüphanesi, Istanbul MEHÂSİN 1 Mehâsinü’l-Âsâr ve Hakâîkü’l-Ahbâr, İstanbul Arkeoloji Müzesi Kütüphanesi nr. 355 MEHÂSİN 2 Mehâsin, İÜ nr. 5978 MEHÂSİN 3 Mehâsin, İÜ nr. 5979 MEHÂSİN 4 Mehâsin, İÜ nr. 6013 MEHÂSİN 5 Mehâsin, İstanbul, 1804. 2 vols MEHÂSİN 6 Mehâsin, TOP nr. 1406 MEHÂSİN (EGYPT) Mehâsin, İÜ nr. 6012 MAC Muhassenât-ı ‘Asker-i Cedîd, Abdullah Uçman, ed., Sekbanbaşı Risalesi, Hulâsat el-Kelâm fi Red el-Avam. İstanbul, 1975. SO Sürreya, Sicill-i Osmânî TOP Topkapı Sarayı Müzesi, Istanbul ÖN Österreichische Nationalbibliothek, Vienna UT University of Toronto Thomas Fisher Rare Book Library Y.EE Yıldız Esas Evrakı viii GLOSSARY amedcî – Receiver-general of the Grand Vezir’s provincial correspondence. anadolu muhâsebecisi – Accounting officer for the province of Anatolia. baş muhâsebeci – Chief accounting officer. beylikçi – Chancery official responsible for promulgation of all edicts and regulations except those of a financial nature; a subordinate of the reis efendi. büyük rûznamçe/tezkireci – Secretary and paymaster of the imperial council. defterdâr – The empire’s chief treasury official. fetvâ emîni – Head of the office dealing with religious opinions or fatwas. hacegân – Bureau chiefs of the Ottoman administration; the highest level of the chancery. kethüdâ bey – The Grand Vezir’s deputy, who acted as his secretary and managed his correspondence. kapıcıbaşı – Head of the palace doorkeepers kapudan-ı deryâ – The Grand Admiral of the Ottoman navy. ix kaymakam – A proxy, here for the Grand Vezir when on campaign. During wartime the Ottoman government accompanied the army in the field and proxies were left in the capital to duplicate their normal functions. mektûbî – Official who managed the correspondence bureau of the Grand Vezir. reisülküttâb – Official in charge of the chancery scribes and secretaries in the financial administration. The reis was the head of the chancery and also, in the eighteenth century, assumed direction of foreign affairs. sefâretnâme – The official report of an Ottoman ambassador, submitted after his return from abroad. serasker – Military commander. şeyhülislâm – The highest religious official in the empire; the chief jurisconsult. sırkâtibi – Privy secretary to the sultan. tevkî‘î – Chancellor; responsible for validating official documents and affixing the sultan’s seal thereto. vekâyi‘nüvis – Official court chronicler. x NOTE ON TRANSLITERATION This study uses a modified Modern Turkish script to render Ottoman Turkish names, titles, terms, and constructs. In general, I adhere to the original orthography and indicate long vowels with a circumflex (Â, â, Î, î, Û, û); I omit the glottal consonants ‘ayn (‘) and hamza (’), which are unvoiced in Turkish, except where absolutely necessary, as in the transliteration of extended passages and key technical terms. For non-specialists the following letters may be unfamiliar: C,c – pronounced “j” as in “jam.” Ç,ç – pronounced “ch” as in “cheese.” Ğ,ğ – this “soft g” is mostly unvoiced and lengthens the preceding vowel. I,ı – pronounced like the first syllable in “early.” Ö,ö – pronounced as in German “schön” or the French “seul.” Ş,ş – pronounced “sh” as in “shoe.” Ü,ü – pronounced as in German or the French “tu.” For Arabic and Persian names, terms, and text, I have followed the transliteration system employed by the International Journal of Middle East Studies (IJMES), which uses diacritics to more accurately reflect the script.
Recommended publications
  • Selim I–Mehmet Vi)
    CHRONOLOGY (SELIM I–MEHMET VI) Years of Sultan Important dates reign 1512–1520 Selim I Conquest of Egypt, Selim assumes the title of Caliph (1517) 1520–1566 Süleyman Vienna sieged (1529); War with Venice (1537–1540); Annexation of Hungary (1541) 1566–1574 Selim II Ottoman navy loses the battle of Lepanto (1571) 1574–1595 Murad III Janissary revolts (1589 and 1591–1592) 1595–1603 Mehmed III War with Austria continues (1595– ) 1603–1617 Ahmed I War with Austria ends; Buda is recovered (1604) 1617–1622 Osman II Janissaries murder Osman (1622) 1622–1623 Mustafa I Janissary Revolt (1622) 1623–1640 Murad IV Baghdad recovered (1638); War with Iran (1624–1639) 1640–1648 İbrahim I War with Venice (1645); Assassination of İbrahim (1648) 1648–1687 Mehmed IV Janissary dominance in Istanbul and anar- chy (1649–1651); War with Venice continues (1663); War with Austria, and siege of Vienna (1683) 1687–1691 Süleyman II Janissary revolt (1687); Austria’s occupation of Belgrade (1688) 1691–1695 Ahmed II War with Austria (1694) 1695–1703 Mustafa II Treaty of Karlowitz (1699); Janissary revolt and deposition of Mustafa (1703) 1703–1730 Ahmed III Refuge of Karl XII (1709); War with Venice (1714–1718); War with Austria (1716); Treaty of Passarowitz (1718); ix x REFORMING OTTOMAN GOVERNANCE Tulip Era (1718–1730) 1730–1754 Mahmud I War with Russia and Austria (1736–1759) 1754–1774 Mustafa III War with Russia (1768); Russian Fleet in the Aegean (1770); Inva- sion of the Crimea (1771) 1774–1789 Abdülhamid I Treaty of Küçük Kaynarca (1774); War with Russia (1787)
    [Show full text]
  • Sex Offender Notification Celtics Make 10-Year, $25M Social Justice Commitment by CARL by MICHAEL P
    Search for The Westfield News Westfield350.comTheThe Westfield WestfieldNews News Serving Westfield, Southwick, and surrounding Hilltowns “TIME IS THE ONLY WEATHER CRITIC WITHOUT TONIGHT AMBITION.” Partly Cloudy. JOHN STEINBECK Low of 55. www.thewestfieldnews.com VOL. 86 NO. 151 TUESDAY, JUNE 27, 2017 75 cents $1.00 FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 2020 VOL. 89 NO. 219 Mandated flu vaccine added to Westfield school immunization policy By AMY PORTER nale behind it, but I know there Staff Writer are a lot of people who are going WESTFIELD – The Westfield to be upset about it, so I just Public Schools immunization want to make sure everybody policy was amended during a understands our hands are tied. special Westfield School We can’t vote to not do it because Committee meeting Sept. 8 to it’s law, or policy, or regulation add a required flu vaccine for all — whatever it is – that comes students per Gov. Charlie down, that is in the purview of Westfield Board of Health nurse Debra Mulvenna applies a band-aid to a Baker’s recent mandate. The the governor.” senior citizen during a past flu shot clinic at the Westfield Council on Aging. policy will now go to a regular Diaz said there are pending (THE WESTFIELD NEWS PHOTO) School Committee meeting for a cases in the courts against the vote. required flu immunization The new influenza require- already. ment. which is one dose vaccine Mayhew said Baker may over- Flu clinics good practice for the current flu season, must turn the mandate. “There’s be received annually by Dec.
    [Show full text]
  • Christian Allies of the Ottoman Empire by Emrah Safa Gürkan
    Christian Allies of the Ottoman Empire by Emrah Safa Gürkan The relationship between the Ottomans and the Christians did not evolve around continuous hostility and conflict, as is generally assumed. The Ottomans employed Christians extensively, used Western know-how and technology, and en- couraged European merchants to trade in the Levant. On the state level, too, what dictated international diplomacy was not the religious factors, but rather rational strategies that were the results of carefully calculated priorities, for in- stance, several alliances between the Ottomans and the Christian states. All this cooperation blurred the cultural bound- aries and facilitated the flow of people, ideas, technologies and goods from one civilization to another. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Christians in the Service of the Ottomans 3. Ottoman Alliances with the Christian States 4. Conclusion 5. Appendix 1. Sources 2. Bibliography 3. Notes Citation Introduction Cooperation between the Ottomans and various Christian groups and individuals started as early as the beginning of the 14th century, when the Ottoman state itself emerged. The Ottomans, although a Muslim polity, did not hesitate to cooperate with Christians for practical reasons. Nevertheless, the misreading of the Ghaza (Holy War) literature1 and the consequent romanticization of the Ottomans' struggle in carrying the banner of Islam conceal the true nature of rela- tions between Muslims and Christians. Rather than an inevitable conflict, what prevailed was cooperation in which cul- tural, ethnic, and religious boundaries seemed to disappear. Ÿ1 The Ottomans came into contact and allied themselves with Christians on two levels. Firstly, Christian allies of the Ot- tomans were individuals; the Ottomans employed a number of Christians in their service, mostly, but not always, after they had converted.
    [Show full text]
  • Barry Lawrence Ruderman Antique Maps Inc
    Barry Lawrence Ruderman Antique Maps Inc. 7407 La Jolla Boulevard www.raremaps.com (858) 551-8500 La Jolla, CA 92037 [email protected] Turcicum Imperium, Carolus Allard Exc. Stock#: 49424 Map Maker: Allard Date: 1680 circa Place: Amsterdam Color: Hand Colored Condition: VG Size: 22 x 18 inches Price: SOLD Description: Rare Carel Allard Map of the Turkish Empire. A fine depiction of the Ottoman Empire on the eve of the Great Turkish War (1683-1699), which marked a turning point in the fortunes of the empire and that of Europe. Up to the 1680s, the European Christian powers of Habsburg, Austria, Russia, Poland-Lithuania and the Republic of Venice, had separately fought the Ottoman Empire in numerous wars over the last century only to arrive at a stalemate. The Turks had largely kept the great gains they had made during the reign of Suleiman the Magnificent (ruled 1520-66), in spite of innumerable attempts by the Christian powers to dislodge them. The line of control generally ran through Croatia, the middle of Hungary and northern Romania, to what is now Moldova, with the Ottoman lands being to the south of the line. In 1683, an Ottoman army broke out of Hungary to besiege Vienna, the Habsburg capital. This sent a shockwave throughout Europe, and only the intervention of Poland's King Jan Sobieski saved the city. In 1684, the region's main Christian powers formed the Holy League, marking the first time that they all joined forces to fight the Ottomans. This quickly turned the tables, as the Allies inflicted a series of severe defeats on the Turks.
    [Show full text]
  • Political and Economic Transition of Ottoman Sovereignty from a Sole Monarch to Numerous Ottoman Elites, 1683–1750S
    Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hung. Volume 70 (1), 49 – 90 (2017) DOI: 10.1556/062.2017.70.1.4 POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC TRANSITION OF OTTOMAN SOVEREIGNTY FROM A SOLE MONARCH TO NUMEROUS OTTOMAN ELITES, 1683–1750S BIROL GÜNDOĞDU Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen Historisches Institut, Osteuropäische Geschichte Otto-Behaghel-Str. 10, Haus D Raum 205, 35394 Gießen, Deutschland e-mail: [email protected] The aim of this paper is to reveal the transformation of the Ottoman Empire following the debacles of the second siege of Vienna in 1683. The failures compelled the Ottoman state to change its socio- economic and political structure. As a result of this transition of the state structure, which brought about a so-called “redistribution of power” in the empire, new Ottoman elites emerged from 1683 until the 1750s. We have divided the above time span into three stages that will greatly help us com- prehend the Ottoman transition from sultanic authority to numerous autonomies of first Muslim, then non-Muslim elites of the Ottoman Empire. During the first period (1683–1699) we see the emergence of Muslim power players at the expense of sultanic authority. In the second stage (1699–1730) we observe the sultans’ unsuccessful attempts to revive their authority. In the third period (1730–1750) we witness the emergence of non-Muslim notables who gradually came into power with the help of both the sultans and external powers. At the end of this last stage, not only did the authority of Ottoman sultans decrease enormously, but a new era evolved where Muslim and non-Muslim leading figures both fought and co-operated with one another for a new distribution of wealth in the Ottoman Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Islamic Gunpowder Empires : Ottomans, Safavids, and Mughals / Douglas E
    “Douglas Streusand has contributed a masterful comparative analysis and an up-to- S date reinterpretation of the significance of the early modern Islamic empires. This T book makes profound scholarly insights readily accessible to undergraduate stu- R dents and will be useful in world history surveys as well as more advanced courses.” —Hope Benne, Salem State College E U “Streusand creatively reexamines the military and political history and structures of the SAN Ottoman, Safavid, and Mughal empires. He breaks down the process of transformation and makes their divergent outcomes comprehensible, not only to an audience of special- ists, but also to undergraduates and general readers. Appropriate for courses in world, early modern, or Middle Eastern history as well as the political sociology of empires.” D —Linda T. Darling, University of Arizona “Streusand is to be commended for navigating these hearty and substantial historiogra- phies to pull together an analytical textbook which will be both informative and thought provoking for the undergraduate university audience.” GUNPOWDER EMPIRES —Colin Mitchell, Dalhousie University Islamic Gunpowder Empires provides an illuminating history of Islamic civilization in the early modern world through a comparative examination of Islam’s three greatest empires: the Otto- IS mans (centered in what is now Turkey), the Safavids (in modern Iran), and the Mughals (ruling the Indian subcontinent). Author Douglas Streusand explains the origins of the three empires; compares the ideological, institutional, military, and economic contributors to their success; and L analyzes the causes of their rise, expansion, and ultimate transformation and decline. Streusand depicts the three empires as a part of an integrated international system extending from the At- lantic to the Straits of Malacca, emphasizing both the connections and the conflicts within that AMIC system.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkish Plastic Arts
    Turkish Plastic Arts by Ayla ERSOY REPUBLIC OF TURKEY MINISTRY OF CULTURE AND TOURISM PUBLICATIONS © Republic of Turkey Ministry of Culture and Tourism General Directorate of Libraries and Publications 3162 Handbook Series 3 ISBN: 978-975-17-3372-6 www.kulturturizm.gov.tr e-mail: [email protected] Ersoy, Ayla Turkish plastic arts / Ayla Ersoy.- Second Ed. Ankara: Ministry of Culture and Tourism, 2009. 200 p.: col. ill.; 20 cm.- (Ministry of Culture and Tourism Publications; 3162.Handbook Series of General Directorate of Libraries and Publications: 3) ISBN: 978-975-17-3372-6 I. title. II. Series. 730,09561 Cover Picture Hoca Ali Rıza, İstambol voyage with boat Printed by Fersa Ofset Baskı Tesisleri Tel: 0 312 386 17 00 Fax: 0 312 386 17 04 www.fersaofset.com First Edition Print run: 3000. Printed in Ankara in 2008. Second Edition Print run: 3000. Printed in Ankara in 2009. *Ayla Ersoy is professor at Dogus University, Faculty of Fine Arts and Design. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 5 Sources of Turkish Plastic Arts 5 Westernization Efforts 10 Sultans’ Interest in Arts in the Westernization Period 14 I ART OF PAINTING 18 The Primitives 18 Painters with Military Background 20 Ottoman Art Milieu in the Beginning of the 20th Century. 31 1914 Generation 37 Galatasaray Exhibitions 42 Şişli Atelier 43 The First Decade of the Republic 44 Independent Painters and Sculptors Association 48 The Group “D” 59 The Newcomers Group 74 The Tens Group 79 Towards Abstract Art 88 Calligraphy-Originated Painters 90 Artists of Geometrical Non-Figurative
    [Show full text]
  • The Istanbul Memories in Salomea Pilsztynowa's Diary
    Memoria. Fontes minores ad Historiam Imperii Ottomanici pertinentes Volume 2 Paulina D. Dominik (Ed.) The Istanbul Memories in Salomea Pilsztynowa’s Diary »Echo of the Journey and Adventures of My Life« (1760) With an introduction by Stanisław Roszak Memoria. Fontes minores ad Historiam Imperii Ottomanici pertinentes Edited by Richard Wittmann Memoria. Fontes Minores ad Historiam Imperii Ottomanici Pertinentes Volume 2 Paulina D. Dominik (Ed.): The Istanbul Memories in Salomea Pilsztynowa’s Diary »Echo of the Journey and Adventures of My Life« (1760) With an introduction by Stanisław Roszak © Max Weber Stiftung – Deutsche Geisteswissenschaftliche Institute im Ausland, Bonn 2017 Redaktion: Orient-Institut Istanbul Reihenherausgeber: Richard Wittmann Typeset & Layout: Ioni Laibarös, Berlin Memoria (Print): ISSN 2364-5989 Memoria (Internet): ISSN 2364-5997 Photos on the title page and in the volume are from Regina Salomea Pilsztynowa’s memoir »Echo of the Journey and Adventures of My Life« (Echo na świat podane procederu podróży i życia mego awantur), compiled in 1760, © Czartoryski Library, Krakow. Editor’s Preface From the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth to Istanbul: A female doctor in the eighteenth-century Ottoman capital Diplomatic relations between the Ottoman Empire and the Polish-Lithuanian Com- monwealth go back to the first quarter of the fifteenth century. While the mutual con- tacts were characterized by exchange and cooperation interrupted by periods of war, particularly in the seventeenth century, the Treaty of Karlowitz (1699) marked a new stage in the history of Ottoman-Polish relations. In the light of the common Russian danger Poland made efforts to gain Ottoman political support to secure its integrity. The leading Polish Orientalist Jan Reychman (1910-1975) in his seminal work The Pol- ish Life in Istanbul in the Eighteenth Century (»Życie polskie w Stambule w XVIII wieku«, 1959) argues that the eighteenth century brought to life a Polish community in the Ottoman capital.
    [Show full text]
  • 2Artboard 1 Copy
    The First One Who Divided Their Countries and Displaced Them Suleiman the Magnificent Inaugurated the Kurdish “Bloodbath” History is merciless. Leaders and headmen shall be aware that one mistake may lead a nation to damage. Sometimes, it may rather eliminate it. This is what happened to Kurds and their relationship with the Ottoman Empire. It started with mutual concern between the two parties. It was followed by an alliance that quickly ended and turned into hostility that caused bloody massacres from which Kurds suffered until today. The story details date back to (1514 AD) when Idris Bitlisi, the leader of Kurds at that time, made a political deal with Selim I (1520 -1512). The deal was that Kurds should help Selim to gain victory over the Safavid state; in return, Ottoman Sultan shall recognize the autonomy of Kurds and give them freedom to form their own army and in addition; not to interfere in their internal affairs. Indeed, the deal was made and Selim I gained victory over Safavids in Chaldiran (1514 AD). The deal between Kurds and Turkish was named Chaldiran. The situation did not last long; as soon as Selim I died (1520 AD), everything changed. Although alliances made between countries do not depend on the life or death of people, this was not applicable to Turkish sultans as whenever one of them superseded, he breached the covenant of his predecessor and so on. Thus, they were known as the Empire of breaching covenants. This was the first mistake of Kurds, even if they realized it too late.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Ottoman Empire on the Conservation of the Architectural Heritage in Jerusalem
    Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies Vol. 10, no. 1 (2020), pp. 127-151, doi : 10.18326/ijims.v10i1. 127-151 The Influence of Ottoman Empire on the conservation of the architectural heritage in Jerusalem Ziad M. Shehada University of Malaya E-mail: [email protected] DOI: 10.18326/ijims.v10i1.127-151 Abstract Jerusalem is one of the oldest cities in the world. It was built by the Canaanites in 3000 B.C., became the first Qibla of Muslims and is the third holiest shrine after Mecca and Medina. It is believed to be the only sacred city in the world that is considered historically and spiritually significant to Muslims, Christians, and Jews alike. Since its establishment, the city has been subjected to a series of changes as a result of political, economic and social developments that affected the architectural formation through successive periods from the beginning leading up to the Ottoman Era, which then achieved relative stability. The research aims to examine and review the conservation mechanisms of the architectural buildings during the Ottoman rule in Jerusalem for more than 400 years, and how the Ottoman Sultans contributed to revitalizing and protecting the city from loss and extinction. The researcher followed the historical interpretive method using descriptive analysis based on a literature review and preliminary study to determine Ottoman practices in conserving the historical and the architectural heritage of Jerusalem. The research found that the Ottoman efforts towards conserving the architectural heritage in Jerusalem fell into four categories (Renovation, Restoration, Reconstruction, and Rehabilitation). The Ottomans 127 IJIMS: Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies, Volume 10, Number 1, June 2020:127-151 focused on the conservation of the existing buildings rather than new construction because of their respect for the local traditions and holy places.
    [Show full text]
  • The Türk in Aşıkpaşazâde: a Private Individual's Ottoman History
    The Türk in Aşıkpaşazâde: A Private Individual’s Ottoman History Murat Cem Mengüç* Aşıkpazâde’deki Türk: Bir Özel Şahsın Osmanlı Tarihi Öz 15. yüzyılda Osmanlı aydınları tarih kitaplarını sivil güçlerini uyguladıkları bir platform olarak kullandılar. Bu makale Aşıkpaşazâde ve onun Kitab-ı Tevarih-i Ali Osman isimli Osmanlı tarihine odaklanıyor. Temel argümanı, bu kitabın sivillerin Osmanlı kimliği ve meşrutiyetinin oluşturulmasını nasıl etkilediklerinin bir örneği olduğu. Makale erken dönem Osmanlı tarih kitaplarında açık bir Türkçü söylemin ortaya çıkışını ve Aşıkpaşazâde’nin bu oluşumdaki rolünü inceliyor. Aynı zamanda, Halil İnalcık ve Jean Jacques Rousseau’nun saptamalarına dayanarak Aşıkpaşazâde’nin hayatını teorik olarak irdeliyor. Aşıkpaşazâde’yi bir private individual (özel şahıs) ola- rak tanımlayan bu makale, bu gibi bireylerle erken modern dönem Batı devletleri ara- sında varolduğu kabul edilen politik güç paylaşımı dinamiklerinin 15. yüzyıl Osmanlı İmparatorluğu’nda da varolduğunun altını çiziyor. Anahtar kelimeler: Osmanlı İmparatorluğu, tarih, tarih yazımı, kimlik, Türk, Türk- men, Aşıkpaşazâde, Halil İnalcık, Jean Jacques Rousseau. And just as the battle with infidel is God’s work and the sultans and warriors who have engaged in it have acquired sanctity, so the recording of their deeds is a holy work, and the author is as entitled as they to a fatiha for the repose of his soul. V. L. Ménage1 * Seton Hall University. 1 V. L. Ménage, “The Beginnings of Ottoman Historiography,” Historians of the Middle East, eds. P. M. Holt and Bernard Lewis, London: Oxford University Press, 1964, 178. Osmanlı Araştırmaları / The Journal of Ottoman Studies, XLIV (2014), 45-66 45 THE TÜRK IN AŞIKPAŞAZÂDE I summarized and wrote down the words and the legends about the Ottomans, filled with events.
    [Show full text]
  • Special List 391 1
    special list 391 1 RICHARD C.RAMER Special List 391 Military 2 RICHARDrichard c. C.RAMER ramer Old and Rare Books 225 east 70th street . suite 12f . new york, n.y. 10021-5217 Email [email protected] . Website www.livroraro.com Telephones (212) 737 0222 and 737 0223 Fax (212) 288 4169 November 9, 2020 Special List 391 Military Items marked with an asterisk (*) will be shipped from Lisbon. SATISFACTION GUARANTEED: All items are understood to be on approval, and may be returned within a reasonable time for any reason whatsoever. VISITORS BY APPOINTMENT special list 391 3 Special List 391 Military Regulations for a Military Academy 1. [ACADEMIA MILITAR, Santiago de Chile]. Reglamento de la Academia Militar ... [text begins:] Debiendo el Director de la Academia militar someterse al reglamento que por el articulo 3º del decreto de 19 de julio del presente ano ha de servirle de pauta .... [Santiago de Chile]: Imprenta de la Opinion, dated 29 August 1831. 4°, early plain wrap- pers (soiled, stained). Caption title. Light stains and soiling. In good condition. 33 pp. $500.00 FIRST and ONLY EDITION of these regulations for the second incarnation of the Academia Militar, ancestor of Chile’s present Escuela Militar. They specify admission requirements, a four-year course of study with the content of each course (pp. 17-24) and the exams (pp. 24-28), what the cadets will be doing every hour of every day, and even how often they will shave and change their linen. Also covered are the duties of the director, sub-director, faculty, chaplain, surgeon, bursar, and doorman.
    [Show full text]