DOCSLIB.ORG

Oklahoma Moth Species by County

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Oklahoma Moth Species by County Oklahoma Moth Species by County Sort Family SubFamily Species Common_Name Adair Alfalfa Atoka Beaver Beckham Blaine Bryan Caddo Canadian Carter Cherokee Choctaw Cimarron Cleveland Coal Comanche Cotton Craig Creek Custer Delaware Dewey Ellis Garfield Garvin Grady Grant Greer Harmon Harper Haskell Hughes Jackson Jefferson Johnston Kay Kingfisher Kiowa Latimer 00003 Eriocraniidae Dyseriocrania griseocapitella Chinquapin Leafminer Moth 00045 Nepticulidae Ectoedemia similella 00073 Nepticulidae Stigmella rhoifoliella Poison Ivy Leafminer Moth 00080 Nepticulidae Stigmella villosella 00111 Nepticulidae Stigmella resplendensella 00121 Opostegidae Pseudopostega albogaleriella 00122 Opostegidae Pseudopostega quadristrigella Gooseberry Barkminer Moth 00126 Tischeriidae Tischeria citrinipennella 00144 Tischeriidae Tischeria quercitella Oak Blotch Miner 00156 Tischeriidae Astrotischeria solidagonifoliella 00160 Tischeriidae Astrotischeria ambrosiaeella 00198 Incurvariidae Prodoxinae Tegeticula yuccasella Yucca Moth x x x x 00200 Incurvariidae Prodoxinae Prodoxus quinquepunctellus xx xx 00200.1 Incurvariidae Prodoxinae Prodoxus decipiens Bogus Yucca Moth 00227 Adeldidae Adela caeruleella Long-horned Fairy Moth 00233 Heliozelidae Antispila freemani 00261 Tineidae Nemapogoninae Nemapogon acapnopennella 00267 Tineidae Nemapogoninae Nemapogon interstitiella 00269 Tineidae Nemapogoninae Nemapogon multistriatella x 00277 Tineidae Meessiinae Eudarcia eunitariaeella 00279 Tineidae Meessiinae Diachorisia velatella 00283 Tineidae Meessiinae Oenoe hybromella 00284 Tineidae Meessiinae Homosetia argentinotella 00299 Tineidae Isocorypha mediostriatella 00300 Tineidae Hybroma servulella 00301 Tineidae Homostinea curviliniella 00317 Tineidae Xylesthia pruniramiella Speckled Xylesthia 00319 Tineidae Kearfottia albifasciella 00340 Tineidae Acrolophus arcanella 00343 Tineidae Acrolophus bicornutus 00347 Tineidae Acrolophus cressoni Cresson's Grass-tubeworm 00365 Tineidae Acrolophus minor x 00366 Tineidae Acrolophus mortipennella xx x x 00372 Tineidae Acrolophus plumifrontella Eastern Grass Tubeworm Moth x x x xxx xx x x xxx x xxx 00373 Tineidae Acrolophus popeanella xxx x xxxxxxx x xxxx x xxxxxx x 00374 Tineidae Acrolophus propinqua Walsingham's Grass Tubeworm Moth 00383 Tineidae Acrolophus texanella Grass-tubeworm x x x x x 00385 Tineidae Acrolophus variabilis xxx x 00392 Tineidae Tinea apicimaculella Tinea Moth 00405 Tineidae Tinea pellionella Case-bearing Clothes Moth x x x x x x 00411 Tineidae Niditinea fuscella European House Moth 00412 Tineidae Niditinea orleansella 00426 Tineidae Tineola Bisselliella Common Clothes Moth 00430 Tineidae Phaeoses sabinella 00441 Psychidae Psychinae Cryptothelea nigrita 00442 Psychidae Psychinae Cryptothelea gloverii x 00445 Psychidae Psychinae Astala edwardsi Chalk-Hills Bagworm Moth x 00457 Psychidae Oiketicinae Thyridopteryx ephemeraeformis Evergreen Bagworm Moth x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x 00462 Lyonetiidae Philonome clemensella 00465 Lyonetiidae Bedellia minor 00466 Lyonetiidae Bedellia somnulentella Morning-glory Leafminer Moth x 00475 Lyonetiidae Paraleucoptera albella Cottonwood Leafminer Moth 00522 Lyonetiidae Bucculatrix angustata 00559 Lyonetiidae Bucculatrix coronatella 00572 Lyonetiidae Buccalatrix ainsliella Oak Skeletonizer Moth 00582 Lyonetiidae Bucculatrix thurberiella x Page 1 of 74 rev. Dec. 10, 2016 Oklahoma Moth Species by County Sort Family SubFamily Species Common_Name Leflore Lincoln Logan Love McClain McCurtain McIntosh Major Marshall Mayes Murray Muskogee Noble Nowata Okfuskee Oklahoma Okmulgee Osage Ottawa Pawnee Payne Pittsburg Pontotoc Pottawatomie Pushmataha Roger Mills Rogers Seminole Sequoyah Stephens Texas Tillman Tulsa Wagoner Washington Washita Woods Woodward 00003 Eriocraniidae Dyseriocrania griseocapitella Chinquapin Leafminer Moth x 00045 Nepticulidae Ectoedemia similella x 00073 Nepticulidae Stigmella rhoifoliella Poison Ivy Leafminer Moth x 00080 Nepticulidae Stigmella villosella x 00111 Nepticulidae Stigmella resplendensella x 00121 Opostegidae Pseudopostega albogaleriella x 00122 Opostegidae Pseudopostega quadristrigella Gooseberry Barkminer Moth xx x 00126 Tischeriidae Tischeria citrinipennella x 00144 Tischeriidae Tischeria quercitella Oak Blotch Miner x 00156 Tischeriidae Astrotischeria solidagonifoliella x 00160 Tischeriidae Astrotischeria ambrosiaeella x 00198 Incurvariidae Prodoxinae Tegeticula yuccasella Yucca Moth xxxxx 00200 Incurvariidae Prodoxinae Prodoxus quinquepunctellus xx 00200.1 Incurvariidae Prodoxinae Prodoxus decipiens Bogus Yucca Moth x x 00227 Adeldidae Adela caeruleella Long-horned Fairy Moth x 00233 Heliozelidae Antispila freemani x 00261 Tineidae Nemapogoninae Nemapogon acapnopennella x 00267 Tineidae Nemapogoninae Nemapogon interstitiella x 00269 Tineidae Nemapogoninae Nemapogon multistriatella x 00277 Tineidae Meessiinae Eudarcia eunitariaeella x 00279 Tineidae Meessiinae Diachorisia velatella x 00283 Tineidae Meessiinae Oenoe hybromella x x 00284 Tineidae Meessiinae Homosetia argentinotella x 00299 Tineidae Isocorypha mediostriatella x 00300 Tineidae Hybroma servulella x x 00301 Tineidae Homostinea curviliniella x 00317 Tineidae Xylesthia pruniramiella Speckled Xylesthia x x 00319 Tineidae Kearfottia albifasciella x x 00340 Tineidae Acrolophus arcanella xx xxxxx 00343 Tineidae Acrolophus bicornutus x 00347 Tineidae Acrolophus cressoni Cresson's Grass-tubeworm xx x 00365 Tineidae Acrolophus minor x 00366 Tineidae Acrolophus mortipennella x x 00372 Tineidae Acrolophus plumifrontella Eastern Grass Tubeworm Moth x xxx x xxxxxxxxxxxx 00373 Tineidae Acrolophus popeanella x xx x xx xxxxxxx xxx xx xxxx x 00374 Tineidae Acrolophus propinqua Walsingham's Grass Tubeworm Moth x 00383 Tineidae Acrolophus texanella Grass-tubeworm xx xxxx x 00385 Tineidae Acrolophus variabilis 00392 Tineidae Tinea apicimaculella Tinea Moth xx 00405 Tineidae Tinea pellionella Case-bearing Clothes Moth x xxx xxx xxxxx 00411 Tineidae Niditinea fuscella European House Moth x 00412 Tineidae Niditinea orleansella x 00426 Tineidae Tineola Bisselliella Common Clothes Moth xx x 00430 Tineidae Phaeoses sabinella x 00441 Psychidae Psychinae Cryptothelea nigrita 00442 Psychidae Psychinae Cryptothelea gloverii x 00445 Psychidae Psychinae Astala edwardsi Chalk-Hills Bagworm Moth 00457 Psychidae Oiketicinae Thyridopteryx ephemeraeformis Evergreen Bagworm Moth x x xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 00462 Lyonetiidae Philonome clemensella x 00465 Lyonetiidae Bedellia minor x 00466 Lyonetiidae Bedellia somnulentella Morning-glory Leafminer Moth xx 00475 Lyonetiidae Paraleucoptera albella Cottonwood Leafminer Moth x 00522 Lyonetiidae Bucculatrix angustata 00559 Lyonetiidae Bucculatrix coronatella x 00572 Lyonetiidae Buccalatrix ainsliella Oak Skeletonizer Moth x 00582 Lyonetiidae Bucculatrix thurberiella xx Page 2 of 74 rev. Dec. 10, 2016 Oklahoma Moth Species by County Sort Family SubFamily Species Common_Name Adair Alfalfa Atoka Beaver Beckham Blaine Bryan Caddo Canadian Carter Cherokee Choctaw Cimarron Cleveland Coal Comanche Cotton Craig Creek Custer Delaware Dewey Ellis Garfield Garvin Grady Grant Greer Harmon Harper Haskell Hughes Jackson Jefferson Johnston Kay Kingfisher Kiowa Latimer 00592 Gracillariidae Caloptilia azaleella Azalea Leafminer Moth 00594 Gracillariidae Caloptilia belfrageella 00596 Gracillariidae Caloptilia blandella 00615 Gracillariidae Caloptilia negundella Boxelder Leafroller 00620 Gracillariidae Caloptilia packardella 00633 Gracillariidae Caloptilia sassafrasella Sassafras Caloptilia 00639 Gracillariidae Caloptilia stigmatella 00644 Gracillariidae Caloptilia violacella 00644.1 Gracillariidae Caloptilia triadicae 00647 Gracillariidae Micrurapteryx salicifoliella Willow Leafblotch Miner Moth 00650 Gracillariidae Parectopa bumeliella 00656 Gracillariidae Parectopa plantaginisella 00657 Gracillariidae Parectopa robiniella Locust Digitate Leafminer 00663 Gracillariidae Neurobathra strigifinitella 00692 Gracillariidae Acrocercops astericola 00702 Gracillariidae Marmara apocynella 00708 Gracillariidae Marmara fasciella 00718 Gracillariidae Marmara smilacisella 00722 Gracillariidae Cremastobombycia ignota 00723 Gracillariidae Cremastobombycia solidaginis Goldenrod Leaf Miner 00734 Gracillariidae Phyllonorycter argentinotella 00742 Gracillariidae Lithocolletinae Phyllonorycter celtifoliella 00743 Gracillariidae Lithocolletinae Phyllonorycter celtisella Leaf Blotch Miner Moth 00752 Gracillariidae Lithocolletinae Phyllonorycter fitchella 00772.5 Gracillariidae Lithocolletinae Phyllonorycter mildredae Leaf Blotch Miner Moth x 00773 Gracillariidae Lithocolletinae Macrosaccus morrisella 00781 Gracillariidae Lithocolletinae Phyllonorycter ostryaefoliella 00803 Gracillariidae Lithocolletinae Cameraria aceriella 00811 Gracillariidae Lithocolletinae Cameraria caryaefoliella Pecan Leafminer Moth 00816 Gracillariidae Lithocolletinae Cameraria conglomeratella 00822 Gracillariidae Lithocolletinae Cameraria guttifinitella 00827 Gracillariidae Lithocolletinae Cameraria macrocarpae 00835 Gracillariidae Lithocolletinae Cameraria quercivorella 00839 Gracillariidae Lithocolletinae Cameraria ilmella 00843 Gracillariidae Lithocolletinae Porphyrosela desmodiella 00846 Gracillariidae Lithocolletinae Phyllocnistis insignis 00854 Gracillariidae Phyllocnistinae Phyllocnistis vitifoliella 00862 Oecophoridae Depressariinae Agonopterix clemensella 00867 Oecophoridae Depressariinae Agonopterix pulvipennella 00878 Oecophoridae Depressariinae Agonopterix canadensis 00882 Oecophoridae Depressariinae Agonopterix robiniella
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SYSTEMATICS of the MEGADIVERSE SUPERFAMILY GELECHIOIDEA (INSECTA: LEPIDOPTEA) DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of T
    SYSTEMATICS OF THE MEGADIVERSE SUPERFAMILY GELECHIOIDEA (INSECTA: LEPIDOPTEA) DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Sibyl Rae Bucheli, M.S. ***** The Ohio State University 2005 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Dr. John W. Wenzel, Advisor Dr. Daniel Herms Dr. Hans Klompen _________________________________ Dr. Steven C. Passoa Advisor Graduate Program in Entomology ABSTRACT The phylogenetics, systematics, taxonomy, and biology of Gelechioidea (Insecta: Lepidoptera) are investigated. This superfamily is probably the second largest in all of Lepidoptera, and it remains one of the least well known. Taxonomy of Gelechioidea has been unstable historically, and definitions vary at the family and subfamily levels. In Chapters Two and Three, I review the taxonomy of Gelechioidea and characters that have been important, with attention to what characters or terms were used by different authors. I revise the coding of characters that are already in the literature, and provide new data as well. Chapter Four provides the first phylogenetic analysis of Gelechioidea to include molecular data. I combine novel DNA sequence data from Cytochrome oxidase I and II with morphological matrices for exemplar species. The results challenge current concepts of Gelechioidea, suggesting that traditional morphological characters that have united taxa may not be homologous structures and are in need of further investigation. Resolution of this problem will require more detailed analysis and more thorough characterization of certain lineages. To begin this task, I conduct in Chapter Five an in- depth study of morphological evolution, host-plant selection, and geographical distribution of a medium-sized genus Depressaria Haworth (Depressariinae), larvae of ii which generally feed on plants in the families Asteraceae and Apiaceae.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera of North America 5
    Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera by Valerio Albu, 1411 E. Sweetbriar Drive Fresno, CA 93720 and Eric Metzler, 1241 Kildale Square North Columbus, OH 43229 April 30, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration: Blueberry Sphinx (Paonias astylus (Drury)], an eastern endemic. Photo by Valeriu Albu. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 Abstract A list of 1531 species ofLepidoptera is presented, collected over 15 years (1988 to 2002), in eleven southern West Virginia counties. A variety of collecting methods was used, including netting, light attracting, light trapping and pheromone trapping. The specimens were identified by the currently available pictorial sources and determination keys. Many were also sent to specialists for confirmation or identification. The majority of the data was from Kanawha County, reflecting the area of more intensive sampling effort by the senior author. This imbalance of data between Kanawha County and other counties should even out with further sampling of the area. Key Words: Appalachian Mountains,
    [Show full text]
  • Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the United States
    Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the United States September 1993 OTA-F-565 NTIS order #PB94-107679 GPO stock #052-003-01347-9 Recommended Citation: U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the United States, OTA-F-565 (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, September 1993). For Sale by the U.S. Government Printing Office ii Superintendent of Documents, Mail Stop, SSOP. Washington, DC 20402-9328 ISBN O-1 6-042075-X Foreword on-indigenous species (NIS)-----those species found beyond their natural ranges—are part and parcel of the U.S. landscape. Many are highly beneficial. Almost all U.S. crops and domesticated animals, many sport fish and aquiculture species, numerous horticultural plants, and most biologicalN control organisms have origins outside the country. A large number of NIS, however, cause significant economic, environmental, and health damage. These harmful species are the focus of this study. The total number of harmful NIS and their cumulative impacts are creating a growing burden for the country. We cannot completely stop the tide of new harmful introductions. Perfect screening, detection, and control are technically impossible and will remain so for the foreseeable future. Nevertheless, the Federal and State policies designed to protect us from the worst species are not safeguarding our national interests in important areas. These conclusions have a number of policy implications. First, the Nation has no real national policy on harmful introductions; the current system is piecemeal, lacking adequate rigor and comprehensiveness. Second, many Federal and State statutes, regulations, and programs are not keeping pace with new and spreading non-indigenous pests.
    [Show full text]
  • GIS Handbook Appendices
    Aerial Survey GIS Handbook Appendix D Revised 11/19/2007 Appendix D Cooperating Agency Codes The following table lists the aerial survey cooperating agencies and codes to be used in the agency1, agency2, agency3 fields of the flown/not flown coverages. The contents of this list is available in digital form (.dbf) at the following website: http://www.fs.fed.us/foresthealth/publications/id/id_guidelines.html 28 Aerial Survey GIS Handbook Appendix D Revised 11/19/2007 Code Agency Name AFC Alabama Forestry Commission ADNR Alaska Department of Natural Resources AZFH Arizona Forest Health Program, University of Arizona AZS Arizona State Land Department ARFC Arkansas Forestry Commission CDF California Department of Forestry CSFS Colorado State Forest Service CTAES Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station DEDA Delaware Department of Agriculture FDOF Florida Division of Forestry FTA Fort Apache Indian Reservation GFC Georgia Forestry Commission HOA Hopi Indian Reservation IDL Idaho Department of Lands INDNR Indiana Department of Natural Resources IADNR Iowa Department of Natural Resources KDF Kentucky Division of Forestry LDAF Louisiana Department of Agriculture and Forestry MEFS Maine Forest Service MDDA Maryland Department of Agriculture MADCR Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation MIDNR Michigan Department of Natural Resources MNDNR Minnesota Department of Natural Resources MFC Mississippi Forestry Commission MODC Missouri Department of Conservation NAO Navajo Area Indian Reservation NDCNR Nevada Department of Conservation
    [Show full text]
  • Bionomics of Bagworms (Lepidoptera: Psychidae)
    ANRV363-EN54-11 ARI 27 August 2008 20:44 V I E E W R S I E N C N A D V A Bionomics of Bagworms ∗ (Lepidoptera: Psychidae) Marc Rhainds,1 Donald R. Davis,2 and Peter W. Price3 1Department of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, 47901; email: [email protected] 2Department of Entomology, Smithsonian Institution, Washington D.C., 20013-7012; email: [email protected] 3Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, 86011-5640; email: [email protected] Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2009. 54:209–26 Key Words The Annual Review of Entomology is online at bottom-up effects, flightlessness, mating failure, parthenogeny, ento.annualreviews.org phylogenetic constraint hypothesis, protogyny This article’s doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.54.110807.090448 Abstract Copyright c 2009 by Annual Reviews. The bagworm family (Lepidoptera: Psychidae) includes approximately All rights reserved 1000 species, all of which complete larval development within a self- 0066-4170/09/0107-0209$20.00 enclosing bag. The family is remarkable in that female aptery occurs in ∗The U.S. Government has the right to retain a over half of the known species and within 9 of the 10 currently recog- nonexclusive, royalty-free license in and to any nized subfamilies. In the more derived subfamilies, several life-history copyright covering this paper. traits are associated with eruptive population dynamics, e.g., neoteny of females, high fecundity, dispersal on silken threads, and high level of polyphagy. Other salient features shared by many species include a short embryonic period, developmental synchrony, sexual segrega- tion of pupation sites, short longevity of adults, male-biased sex ratio, sexual dimorphism, protogyny, parthenogenesis, and oviposition in the pupal case.
    [Show full text]
  • Big Creek Lepidoptera Checklist
    Big Creek Lepidoptera Checklist Prepared by J.A. Powell, Essig Museum of Entomology, UC Berkeley. For a description of the Big Creek Lepidoptera Survey, see Powell, J.A. Big Creek Reserve Lepidoptera Survey: Recovery of Populations after the 1985 Rat Creek Fire. In Views of a Coastal Wilderness: 20 Years of Research at Big Creek Reserve. (copies available at the reserve). family genus species subspecies author Acrolepiidae Acrolepiopsis californica Gaedicke Adelidae Adela flammeusella Chambers Adelidae Adela punctiferella Walsingham Adelidae Adela septentrionella Walsingham Adelidae Adela trigrapha Zeller Alucitidae Alucita hexadactyla Linnaeus Arctiidae Apantesis ornata (Packard) Arctiidae Apantesis proxima (Guerin-Meneville) Arctiidae Arachnis picta Packard Arctiidae Cisthene deserta (Felder) Arctiidae Cisthene faustinula (Boisduval) Arctiidae Cisthene liberomacula (Dyar) Arctiidae Gnophaela latipennis (Boisduval) Arctiidae Hemihyalea edwardsii (Packard) Arctiidae Lophocampa maculata Harris Arctiidae Lycomorpha grotei (Packard) Arctiidae Spilosoma vagans (Boisduval) Arctiidae Spilosoma vestalis Packard Argyresthiidae Argyresthia cupressella Walsingham Argyresthiidae Argyresthia franciscella Busck Argyresthiidae Argyresthia sp. (gray) Blastobasidae ?genus Blastobasidae Blastobasis ?glandulella (Riley) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.1) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.2) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.3) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.4) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.5) Blastobasidae Holcocera (sp.6) Blastobasidae Holcocera gigantella (Chambers) Blastobasidae
    [Show full text]
  • 57. Accident Prevention Plan INTRODUCTION Like Everything Else in a Farm Enterprise, Health and Security Must Be Managed
    Wild Blueberry in a Context of Production Guide... Sustainable Development 57. Accident Prevention Plan INTRODUCTION Like everything else in a farm enterprise, health and security must be managed. This means dedicating a certain amount of time to these concerns, and emphasizing teamwork. The employer must show that he cares about accident prevention, and employees must be involved in fi nding causes and solutions. BILL C-21 AND EMPLOYER OBLIGATIONS In force since March 31, 2004, the Act to amend the Criminal Code of Canada (Bill C-21) included substantial changes with regard to health and safety in the workplace. Employers are now subject to criminal proceedings after a serious accident if measures were not in place to protect the health and safety of workers. In fact, anyone who manages or supervises one or more workers must show that health and safety obligations are respected, taking all reasonable precautions to prevent bodily injury due to accident. Bill C-21 reinforces the Québec Act respecting Occupational health and safety (see References), which stipulates that every worker has a right to working conditions that have proper regard for his health, safety and physical well-being (section 9). The employer thus has an obligation to take whatever measures are necessary to protect the health and safety of workers (section 51). He must ensure that risks are eliminated at the source by organizing the workplace in a safe manner and by training workers on safe techniques and procedures. He is also obligated to provide individual protection equipment, free of charge, and to require workers to use it.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera Recorded for Imperial County California Compiled by Jeffrey Caldwell [email protected] 1-925-949-8696 Note
    Lepidoptera Recorded for Imperial County California Compiled by Jeffrey Caldwell [email protected] 1-925-949-8696 Note: BMNA = Butterflies and Moths of North America web site MPG = Moth Photographers Group web site Most are from the Essig Museum’s California Moth Specimens Database web site Arctiidae. Tiger and Lichen Moths. Apantesis proxima (Notarctia proxima). Mexican Tiger Moth. 8181 [BMNA] Ectypia clio (clio). Clio Tiger Moth. 8249 Estigmene acrea (acrea). Salt Marsh Moth. 8131 Euchaetes zella. 8232 Autostichidae (Deoclonidae). Oegoconia novimundi. Four-spotted Yellowneck Moth. 1134 (Oegoconia quadripuncta mis-applied) Bucculatricidae. Ribbed Cocoon-maker Moths. Bucculatrix enceliae. Brittlebrush Moth. 0546 Cossidae. Goat Moths, Carpenterworm Moths, and Leopard Moths. Comadia henrici. 2679 Givira mucida. 2660 Hypopta palmata. 2656 Prionoxystus robiniae (mixtus). Carpenterworm or Locust Borer. 2693 Depressariidae. Pseudethmia protuberans. 1008 [MPG] Ethmiidae. Now assigned to Depressariidae. Ethmiinae. Ethmia timberlakei. 0984 Pseudethmia protuberans. 1008 Gelechiidae. Twirler Moths. Aristotelia adceanotha. 1726 [Sighting 1019513 BMNA] Chionodes abdominella. 2054 Chionodes dentella. 2071 Chionodes fructuaria. 2078 Chionodes kincaidella. 2086 (reared from Atriplex acanthocarpa in Texas) Chionodes oecus. 2086.2 Chionodes sistrella. 2116 Chionodes xanthophilella. 2125 Faculta inaequalis. Palo Verde Webworm. 2206 Friseria cockerelli. Mesquite Webworm. 1916 Gelechia desiliens. 1938 Isophrictis sabulella. 1701 Keiferia lycopersicella. Tomato Pinworm. 2047 Pectinophora gossypiella. Pink Bollworm. 2261 Prolita puertella. 1895 Prolita veledae. 1903 Geometridae. Inchworm Moths, Loopers, Geometers, or Measuring Worms. Archirhoe neomexicana. 7295 Chesiadodes coniferaria. 6535 Chlorochlamys appellaria. 7073 Cyclophora nanaria. Dwarf Tawny Wave. W 7140 Dichorda illustraria. 7055 Dichordophora phoenix. Phoenix Emerald. 7057 Digrammia colorata. Creosote Moth. 6381 Digrammia irrorata (rubricata). 6395 Digrammia pictipennata. 6372 Digrammia puertata.
    [Show full text]
  • Gut Content Metabarcoding Unveils the Diet of a Flower‐Associated Coastal
    ECOSPHERE NATURALIST No guts, no glory: Gut content metabarcoding unveils the diet of a flower-associated coastal sage scrub predator PAUL MASONICK , MADISON HERNANDEZ, AND CHRISTIANE WEIRAUCH Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, 900 University Avenue, Riverside, California 92521 USA Citation: Masonick, P., M. Hernandez, and C. Weirauch. 2019. No guts, no glory: Gut content metabarcoding unveils the diet of a flower-associated coastal sage scrub predator. Ecosphere 10(5):e02712. 10.1002/ecs2.2712 Abstract. Invertebrate generalist predators are ubiquitous and play a major role in food-web dynamics. Molecular gut content analysis (MGCA) has become a popular means to assess prey ranges and specificity of cryptic arthropods in the absence of direct observation. While this approach has been widely used to study predation on economically important taxa (i.e., pests) in agroecosystems, it is less frequently used to study the broader trophic interactions involving generalist predators in natural communities such as the diverse and threatened coastal sage scrub communities of Southern California. Here, we employ DNA metabarcoding-based MGCA and survey the taxonomically and ecologically diverse prey range of Phymata pacifica Evans, a generalist flower-associated ambush bug (Hemiptera: Reduviidae). We detected predation on a wide array of taxa including beneficial pollinators, potential pests, and other predatory arthropods. The success of this study demonstrates the utility of MGCA in natural ecosystems and can serve as a model for future diet investigations into other cryptic and underrepresented communities. Key words: biodiversity; blocking primers; DNA detectability half-life; Eriogonum fasciculatum; food webs; intraguild predation; natural enemies. Received 24 January 2019; accepted 11 February 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Sherwood Forest Lepidoptera Species List
    Sherwood Forest Lepidoptera Historical and modern species lists and records - First Edition 2009 T. and D. Pendleton Introduction to Sherwood Forest Lepidoptera First edition 2009 One aspect of recording which has not changed since the 1800’s, is the lack of attention given by Lepidopterists to the site’s micro lepidoptera. Virtually all This publication is aimed at providing an accurate record of all Sherwood Forest micro records sourced from Carr’s book were attributed to R.E. Brameld, who Lepidoptera recorded from the 1800‘s, the 1900’s, post-2000 records and must have spent many hours in the field recording. Without his work, then much completely up to date with the inclusion of the latest records from 2008 and larger gaps would have appeared in the records. As it is, much work is still follows the same format as we have used in the accompanying publication required to record the many leaf-mining species which Sherwood Forest Sherwood Forest Coleoptera - 2009 Edition. undoubtedly holds. It is by no means a complete list and should not be treated as so, but Recent Lepidoptera surveys and recording represents a hopeful start on the way to producing a definitive Sherwood Forest site list, by trying to gather all available Lepidoptera records in one document. A great deal of moth trapping and recording took place at the Visitor Centre during the 1980’s and has provided some very useful data, which at some time This is the first edition of this project and includes traceable public records in the future, will perhaps be used to enable a comparison with more recent and those held privately by local naturalists and our thanks go to those records and numbers.
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated List of the Lepidoptera of Alberta, Canada
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 38: 1–549 (2010) Annotated list of the Lepidoptera of Alberta, Canada 1 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.38.383 MONOGRAPH www.pensoftonline.net/zookeys Launched to accelerate biodiversity research An annotated list of the Lepidoptera of Alberta, Canada Gregory R. Pohl1, Gary G. Anweiler2, B. Christian Schmidt3, Norbert G. Kondla4 1 Editor-in-chief, co-author of introduction, and author of micromoths portions. Natural Resources Canada, Northern Forestry Centre, 5320 - 122 St., Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6H 3S5 2 Co-author of macromoths portions. University of Alberta, E.H. Strickland Entomological Museum, Department of Biological Sciences, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2E3 3 Co-author of introduction and macromoths portions. Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes, K.W. Neatby Bldg., 960 Carling Ave., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6 4 Author of butterfl ies portions. 242-6220 – 17 Ave. SE, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2A 0W6 Corresponding authors: Gregory R. Pohl ([email protected]), Gary G. Anweiler ([email protected]), B. Christian Schmidt ([email protected]), Norbert G. Kondla ([email protected]) Academic editor: Donald Lafontaine | Received 11 January 2010 | Accepted 7 February 2010 | Published 5 March 2010 Citation: Pohl GR, Anweiler GG, Schmidt BC, Kondla NG (2010) An annotated list of the Lepidoptera of Alberta, Canada. ZooKeys 38: 1–549. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.38.383 Abstract Th is checklist documents the 2367 Lepidoptera species reported to occur in the province of Alberta, Can- ada, based on examination of the major public insect collections in Alberta and the Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes.
    [Show full text]
  • Keystone Ancient Forest Preserve Resource Management Plan 2011
    Keystone Ancient Forest Preserve Resource Management Plan 2011 Osage County & Tulsa County, Oklahoma Lowell Caneday, Ph.D. With Kaowen (Grace) Chang, Ph.D., Debra Jordan, Re.D., Michael J. Bradley, and Diane S. Hassell This page intentionally left blank. 2 Acknowledgements The authors acknowledge the assistance of numerous individuals in the preparation of this Resource Management Plan. On behalf of the Oklahoma Tourism and Recreation Department’s Division of State Parks, staff members were extremely helpful in providing access to information and in sharing of their time. In particular, this assistance was provided by Deby Snodgrass, Kris Marek, and Doug Hawthorne – all from the Oklahoma City office of the Oklahoma Tourism and Recreation Department. However, it was particularly the assistance provided by Grant Gerondale, Director of Parks and Recreation for the City of Sand Springs, Oklahoma, that initiated the work associated with this RMP. Grant provided a number of documents, hosted an on-site tour of the Ancient Forest, and shared his passion for this property. It is the purpose of the Resource Management Plan to be a living document to assist with decisions related to the resources within the park and the management of those resources. The authors’ desire is to assist decision-makers in providing high quality outdoor recreation experiences and resources for current visitors, while protecting the experiences and the resources for future generations. Lowell Caneday, Ph.D., Professor Leisure Studies Oklahoma State University Stillwater,
    [Show full text]