DOCSLIB.ORG

In Re American Apparel, Inc. Shareholder Litigation 10-CV-06352-Second Amended Class Action Complaint for Violation of Federal S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
In Re American Apparel, Inc. Shareholder Litigation 10-CV-06352-Second Amended Class Action Complaint for Violation of Federal S Case 2:10-cv-06352-MMM-JCG Document 144 Filed 02/15/13 Page 1 of 134 Page ID #:2751 ri 1 KESSLER TOPAZ MELTZER & CHECK, LLP 2 Ramzi Abadou (222567) [4'] [email protected] gCT C 3 Eli R. Greenstein (217945) egreensteincktrnc. corn 4 Stacey M.raplan(241989) r:c.1 5 2013 skap1anktme, corn 5 Erik D. Peterson (257098) çpetersonktrnc,com 6 One Sansorne Street, Suite 1 850 San Francisco, CA 94104 7 Telephone: (415) 400-3000 Facsimile: (415) 400-3001 8 Lead Counselfor Lead Plaint iJJ and the Class 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 WESTERN DIVISION 12 IN RE AMERICAN APPAREL, Case No. CV-10-6352 MMM (JCG) 13 INC. SHAREHOLDER (Consolidated) LITIGATION 14 SECOND AMENDED CLASS 15 ACTION COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF FEDERAL 16 SECURITIES LAWS 17 This Document Relates To: JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 18 ALL ACTIONS, 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case 2:10-cv-06352-MMM-JCG Document 144 Filed 02/15/13 Page 2 of 134 Page ID #:2752 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 I. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................... 1 3 II. SUMMARY OF THE ACTION ..................................................................... 2 4 A. American Apparel’s Business Model and Brand .................................. 2 5 B. Class Period Allegations ....................................................................... 5 1. Defendants’ Immigration Compliance Misrepresentations ........ 5 6 2. Defendants Misleadingly Downplay the Negative Effects 7 of the Terminations on the Company’s Operations .................. 10 8 3. Defendants Disclose the Severe Disruptions Caused by the 9 Manufacturing Workforce Terminations .................................. 13 10 4. Defendants’ Misleading Statements Regarding American Apparel’s Unorthodox Business Practices ............................... 14 11 a. Deloitte Resigns and the DOJ Commences a 12 Criminal Investigation....................................................16 13 b. Deloitte Publicly Accuses Defendants of Committing Fraud .......................................................... 17 14 C. Post-Class Period Events .................................................................... 19 15 III JURISDICTION AND VENUE ................................................................... 21 16 IV THEPARTIES .............................................................................................. 22 17 A. Lead Plaintiff....................................................................................... 22 18 B. Corporate Defendant...........................................................................22 19 C. Individual Defendants.........................................................................22 20 D. Lion Capital ......................................................................................... 27 21 V CONFIDENTIAL WITNESSES................................................................... 27 22 A. Confidential Witness 1........................................................................27 23 B. Confidential Witness 2........................................................................28 24 C. Confidential Witness 3 ....................................................................... 31 25 D. Confidential Witness 4........................................................................32 E. Confidential Witness 5........................................................................32 26 F. Confidential Witness 6........................................................................33 27 G. Confidential Witness 7........................................................................33 28 -i- Case 2:10-cv-06352-MMM-JCG Document 144 Filed 02/15/13 Page 3 of 134 Page ID #:2753 1 H. Confidential Witness 8........................................................................34 I. Confidential Witness 9........................................................................35 2 J. Confidential Witness 10......................................................................37 3 K. Confidential Witness 11......................................................................39 4 L. Confidential Witness 12......................................................................40 5 M Confidential Witness 13......................................................................41 6 N. Confidential Witness 14......................................................................42 7 O. Confidential Witness 15......................................................................42 8 VI. BACKGROUND TO THE CLASS PERIOD............................................... 43 9 A. The Individual Defendants Take American Apparel Public ............... 43 10 B. U.S. Immigration Law Employment Requirements ........................... 45 11 C. Defendants Surreptitiously Prepare for the I-9 Audit ......................... 47 12 D. American Apparel Is Served with the Inspection Notice ................... 48 13 VII. EXCHANGE ACT VIOLATIONS...............................................................52 A. Defendants Conceal the Inspection Notice While Simultaneously 14 Assuring Investors that Its Workers Are Documented ....................... 52 15 B. Defendants Partially Reveal American Apparel’s Massive 16 Undocumented Workforce..................................................................55 17 C. Defendants Make False and Misleading Statements and Omissions About the Effects of the Terminations..............................58 18 D. Defendants Knowingly Misled Investors About the Negative 19 Effects of the Terminations.................................................................62 20 1. Defendants Knew that Their Vertically-Integrated Operations Had Been Severely Disrupted by the 21 Terminations.............................................................................62 22 2. Defendants Knew that American Apparel Lacked Proper 23 Inventory Following the Terminations ..................................... 64 24 3. Defendants Knew, or Were Reckless in Not Knowing, that the Large Turnover in American Apparel’s Manufacturing 25 Workforce Had Harmed the Company’s Operations and 26 FutureProspects........................................................................ 67 27 28 -ii- Case 2:10-cv-06352-MMM-JCG Document 144 Filed 02/15/13 Page 4 of 134 Page ID #:2754 1 4. Defendants Had Access to Information Showing the Terminations’ Negative Effects on the Company’s 2 Operations and Future Prospects .............................................. 70 3 5. Defendants Suddenly Stop Reporting Their Monthly Sales 4 Figuresin 4Q09 ........................................................................ 74 E. Defendants Partially Disclose the Effects of the Terminations .......... 76 5 F. Lion Capital and American Apparel Become Business Partners ....... 79 6 G. Defendants Engage in Undisclosed Reckless Business Practices ...... 86 7 1. Defendants Conceal American Apparel’s Debt Covenant 8 Breach....................................................................................... 89 9 2. Defendants Withhold American Apparel’s Negative Financial Results and Projections from Deloitte in 1Q10 ........ 99 10 3. Deloitte Accuses the Individual Defendants of Fraud ............ 104 11 VIII. LOSS CAUSATION ................................................................................... 106 12 IX. PLAINTIFF’S CLASS ACTION ALLEGATIONS...................................110 13 X. NO SAFE HARBOR ................................................................................... 113 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -iii- Case 2:10-cv-06352-MMM-JCG Document 144 Filed 02/15/13 Page 5 of 134 Page ID #:2755 1 I. INTRODUCTION 2 1. Lead Plaintiff, Charles Rendelman (“Lead Plaintiff” or “Plaintiff”), 3 alleges the following based upon Lead Counsel’s investigation, which included, 4 among other things: (i) interviews with former American Apparel, Inc. (“American 5 Apparel” or the “Company”) employees; (ii) a review of Defendants’ public 6 documents, conference calls and announcements, U.S. Securities and Exchange 7 Commission (“SEC”) filings, wire and press releases published by and regarding 8 American Apparel; (iii) documents obtained via a Freedom of Information Act 9 (“FOIA”) request to U.S. Immigration Customs and Enforcement (“ICE”); and (iv) 10 securities analysts’ and news reports about the Company. Lead Plaintiff believes 11 that substantial additional evidentiary support will exist for the allegations set forth 12 herein after a reasonable opportunity for discovery. 13 2. This is a putative class action for violation of the federal securities 14 laws brought under §§10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the 15 “Exchange Act”), and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the SEC. Lead 16 Plaintiff’s claims are brought on behalf of all persons who purchased or otherwise 17 acquired American Apparel common stock between November 28, 2007 and 18 August 17, 2010, inclusive (the “Class Period”), to recover damages caused by 19 Defendants’ violations of the securities laws as alleged herein. 20 3. Defendants are: (i) American Apparel; (ii) the Company’s Chief 21 Executive Officer (“CEO”), President and Chairman of the Board of Directors 22 (“Chairman”), Dov Charney (“Charney”); (iii) the Company’s Director of 23 Corporate Finance and Development, Executive Vice President and Chief 24 Financial Officer (“CFO”), Adrian Kowalewski (“Kowalewski”) (collectively, 25 “Defendants”); 1 and (iv) Lion Capital LLP, a private
Load more

Recommended publications
  • American Apparel Fights for Survival with New Plan
    latimes.com/news BUSINESS American Apparel Fights For Survival With New Plan American Apparel plans to cut $30 may be cautious to wade into the legal The Gores Group, BCBG Max Azria and million in expenses, trim work- mess. The company says it will fight the Laundry by Shelli Segal. force, shrink store size and launch lawsuits, but doing so could prove to be a Schneider’s been steadily reshaping a new fall clothing line. distraction. the executive team at American Apparel. Paula Schneider, who joined the com- The new additions to the company’s lead- BY DEBRA BORCHARDT pany as ceo in January, said, “We are ership team include Christine Olcu as committed to turning this company general manager of global retail and Brad The troubled American Apparel Inc. around. Today’s announcements are nec- Gebhard as president of wholesale. Olcu said it might not have enough money to essary steps to help American Apparel is tasked with improving store productivi- survive for the next year and could have adapt to headwinds in the retail industry, ty and Gebhard, who has been working in to raise additional capital to stay alive. preserve jobs for the overwhelming ma- the capacity as a consultant will oversee The company known for the sometimes jority of our outrageous behavior by founder Dov 10,000 employ- Charney said it has embarked on a turn- “Even if American Apparel increases revenue ees, and return and cuts costs, there can be no guarantee around plan that includes cutting costs the business to and new executive appointments.
    [Show full text]
  • Competition Among Domestic Apparel Manufacturers Mary Simpson Walden University
    Walden University ScholarWorks Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection 2017 Competition Among Domestic Apparel Manufacturers Mary Simpson Walden University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations Part of the Business Administration, Management, and Operations Commons, and the Management Sciences and Quantitative Methods Commons This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection at ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Walden University College of Management and Technology This is to certify that the doctoral study by Mary Simpson has been found to be complete and satisfactory in all respects, and that any and all revisions required by the review committee have been made. Review Committee Dr. Timothy Malone, Committee Chairperson, Doctor of Business Administration Faculty Dr. Jon Corey, Committee Member, Doctor of Business Administration Faculty Dr. Richard Johnson II, University Reviewer, Doctor of Business Administration Faculty Chief Academic Officer Eric Riedel, Ph.D. Walden University 2017 Abstract Competition Among Domestic Apparel Manufacturers by Mary P. Simpson MBA, Liberty University, 2006 BS, Liberty University, 1986 Doctoral Study Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Business Administration Walden University August 2017 Abstract Apparel manufacturing characterizes a sustainable means of creating employment and encouraging economic growth; however, 86% of U.S. apparel manufacturing companies and 74.7% in North Carolina have closed since the late 1990s. Less than 3% of apparel bought in the United States is domestic.
    [Show full text]
  • Request for Comments Concerning Trade Regulation Rule on Care Labeling of Textile Wearing Apparel and Certain
    57552 Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 221 / Thursday, November 16, 1995 / Proposed Rules Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Subsequent to publication in the Commission, Room H±159, Sixth and Extending Upward From 700 Feet or More Federal Register it was discovered that Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, Above the Surface of the Earth the geographical coordinates and airport DC 20580. Comments about this * * * * * name were in error. conditional exemption to the Care AGL ND E5 Hettinger, ND [New] Labeling Rule should be identified as Hettinger Municipal Airport, ND Conclusion ° ′ ′′ ° ′ ′′ ``Conditional exemption for symbols, 16 (Lat. 46 00 56 N, long. 102 39 20 W). In consideration of the erroneous CFR Part 423ÐComment.'' That airspace extending upward from 700 information, action to revise the Class E FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: feet above the surface within a 6.4-mile airspace serving Rice Lake Municipal Constance M. Vecellio, Attorney, radius of the Hettinger Municipal Airport Airport, Rice Lake, WI, has been and within 1.9 miles each side of the 136 Federal Trade Commission, withdrawn. bearing from the Hettinger Municipal Airport Washington, DC 20580, (202) 326±2966. from the 6.4-mile radius to 8.9 miles List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 southeast of the airport, and that airspace SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Airspace, Incorporation by reference, extending upward from 1,200 feet above the I. Introduction surface bounded by a line beginning at Lat. Navigation (air). 462000N/Long. 1025800W, to Lat. 462000N/ Withdrawal of Proposed Rule On June 15, 1994, the Commission Long. 1024400W, to Lat. 454500N/Long. published a Federal Register notice 1020900W, to Lat.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERZITA KARLOVA V PRAZE Fotografické Strategie Společnosti
    UNIVERZITA KARLOVA V PRAZE FAKULTA SOCIÁLNÍCH VĚD Institut komunikačních studií a žurnalistiky Katedra žurnalistiky Jan Červenka Fotografické strategie společnosti American Apparel Bakalářská práce Praha 2015 ‚ Autor práce: Jan Červenka Vedoucí práce: doc. MgA. Filip Láb, Ph.D. Oponent práce: Rok obhajoby: 2015 Hodnocení: ‚ Bibliografický záznam ČERVENKA, Jan. Fotografické strategie společnosti American Apparel, Praha, 2015. Počet s. 45 Bakalářská práce (Bc.) Univerzita Karlova, Fakulta sociálních věd, Institut komunikačních studií a žurnalistiky, Katedra žurnalistiky. Vedoucí bakalářské práce doc. MgA. Filip Láb, Ph.D. Abstrakt Předmětem práce je analyzovat fotografické strategie oděvní společnosti American Apparel v letech 2011 – 2015 a její současné reklamní strategie. V teoretické části práce se text zaměří na principy reklamní fotografie a popíše historii fotografie módní. Dále zmíní práce fotografů, kteří se ve svém životě věnovali atypickým reklamním strategiím. Obsahem další části práce je přehled vzniku a vývoje společnosti American Apparel a jejího zakladatele Dova Charneyho. Na základě textů teoretika obrazu Roland Barthese a metod popsaných v knize Metody výzkumu médií od Trampoty a Vojtěchovské, aplikuje autor práce své poznatky na kvantitativní i kvalitativní výzkum již zmíněných reklamních fotografií. Stěžejním výstupem práce je právě kvalitativní analýza, jejíž předlohou se stal Barthesův text Rétorika obrazu. Abstract The aim of this thesis is to analyse American Apparel’s photographical strategies and its advertising tendencies in the years 2011 – 2015. In the theoretical part of this thesis, the text will cover the principals of advertising photography and will briefly describe the history of fashion photography. Also it will mention the work of famous photographers who have worked with atypical visual methods in the past.
    [Show full text]
  • 40%Off 40%Off 30%Off 20%Off
    ONE DAY OFFERS 40%OFF 40%OFF 30%OFF 20%OFF THE ORIGINAL PRICE OF THE ORIGINAL PRICE OF MEN’S THE ORIGINAL PRICE OF THE ORIGINAL PRICE OF WOMEN’S CLOTHING BY BASQUE, SUITS BY CALVIN KLEIN, BLAQ, WOMEN’S INTIMATE APPAREL SMALL ELECTRICAL KITCHEN YARRA TRAIL, CHARLIE BROWN, NEW ENGLAND, TRENT NATHAN, AND SLEEPWEAR* APPLIANCES, MICROWAVES, JAG, PIPER, HOWARD SHOWERS, CAMBRIDGE, JEFF BANKS AND Excludes clearance and Peter Alexander. ELECTRICAL PERSONAL CARE, JAYSON BRUNSDON BLACK LABEL ITALIA COLLEZIONI FROM THE FLOOR AND GARMENT CARE* AND MARCO POLO* MEN’S FORMAL DEPARTMENT* Excludes KitchenAid, Magimix, Vitamix, Dualit, Smeg, Breville The Oracle coffee machine BES980, Excludes clearance. Includes Petite Sizes where available. Excludes clearance and Blaq Slim. The Boss blender BBL910, Miele coffee machines and microwaves, Clarisonic and Clinique Sonic. 30%OFF 40%OFF 30%OFF 45%OFF THE ORIGINAL PRICE OF THE ORIGINAL PRICE OF THE ORIGINAL PRICE OF THE ORIGINAL PRICE WOMEN’S FOOTWEAR, BONDS WOMEN’S, MEN’S CHILDREN’S SWEAT TOPS, OF COOKWARE* HANDBAGS AND WALLETS* AND CHILDREN’S UNDERWEAR JACKETS, TRACKPANTS, Excludes clearance, electrical, hot price items, Le Creuset, Woll and Fissler. Excludes clearance. Further exclusions apply CLOTHING, SLEEPWEAR, KNITWEAR, COVERALLS, see myer.com.au/whatson or in-store. HOSIERY AND SOCKS* DRESSES, SETS AND FOOTWEAR* Excludes clearance. Excludes clearance, sleepwear, Nike, Scotch Shrunk, Scotch R’Belle, Seafolly and Tiger Joe. WOMENSWEAR MENSWEAR ACCESSORIES HOMEWARES 30% OFF 40% OFF 40% OFF 20% OFF THE ORIGINAL PRICE OF WOMEN’S THE ORIGINAL PRICE OF MEN’S THE ORIGINAL PRICE OF WOMEN’S THE ORIGINAL PRICE OF CLOTHING BY TOMMY HILFIGER, CASUAL CLOTHING BY RESERVE, BLAQ, HOSIERY AND SOCKS* VILLEROY & BOCH* HI THERE FROM KAREN WALKER, BRAVE BY WAYNE COOPER, BLAZER, Excludes clearance, Nike, Peter Alexander, American Apparel, Excludes La Classica collection, Anmut Amazonia, GORDON SMITH, TRENT NATHAN, WISH, M-ONE-11, BROOKSFIELD AND JAG* hosiery multipacks and Miss Shop department.
    [Show full text]
  • Dov Charney's American Dream Audio Part 3: Photos Https
    Dov Charney’s American Dream Audio Part 3: Photos https://gimletmedia.com/episode/part-3-photos-season-4-episode-6/ Part 4: Boundaries https://gimletmedia.com/episode/part-4-boundaries-season-4-episode-7/ Part 5: Suits https://gimletmedia.com/episode/part-5-suits-season-4-episode-8/ Part 6: Anger https://gimletmedia.com/episode/part-6-anger-season-4-episode-9/ Part 7: MAGIC https://gimletmedia.com/episode/part-7-magic-season-4-episode-10/ Host: Lisa Chow ​ Senior Producer: Kaitlin Roberts ​ Producers: Bruce Wallace, Luke Malone, Molly Messick ​ Associate Producer: Simone Polanen ​ Editors: Alex Blumberg, Alexandra Johnes, Caitlin Kenney ​ Audio Engineers: Andrew Dunn, David Herman, Martin Peralta, Dara Hersch ​ 2 Episode Transcripts Part 3: Photos DOV: Look how cool that is, that metro thing. C’mon that is cool. Isn’t it? LISA: Oh yeah! There’s a metro stop right on a highway? DOV: Yeah, this is LA, dude. Get with the program. LISA: Hello. From Gimlet Media, this is StartUp. I'm Lisa Chow. And once again, I’m sitting in the car with the ex-CEO of American Apparel Dov Charney. And just a quick warning, there’s some swearing in this episode … and some sexual content. DOV: This is an interesting mural that I’m going to shoot now since we’re in traffic. That’s a good one. LISA: Dov’s taking photographs while driving. This happens all the time. Something catches his eye — a mural or an old sign or a storefront — and he has to get the shot. So he rolls down the window, grabs his phone, and stretches out both hands…and totally forgets about the steering wheel.
    [Show full text]
  • BATTLE of the APPS Banana’S New Flagship Beauty-Booking Apps Are Quickly Overpopulating the Rapidly Expanding Mobile Universe in Cyberspace
    ADIDAS KENDALL’S STEPS UP CALVINS KENDALL JENNER IS THE TOKYO TALES THE STRUGGLING GERMAN FACE OF THE LATEST AD MIUCCIA PRADA MINGLED WITH REI KAWAKUBO, ACTIVEWEAR BRAND OUTLINES AN CAMPAIGN FOR CALVIN RAF SIMONS AND MORE AT A MIU MIU EVENT AGGRESSIVE FIVE-YEAR PLAN TO KLEIN JEANS. PAGE 4 IN THE JAPANESE CAPITAL. PAGE 11 GET BACK TO GROWTH. PAGE 2 FROM DOV TO SEC No End To The Woes At American Apparel By EVAN CLARK AMERICAN APPAREL INC. is teetering on the edge of chaos. And if that in itself is nothing new, this time around the retailer’s facing an unusually thorny set of challenges on multiple fronts: ■ Ousted founder Dov Charney continues to stir up FRIDAY, MARCH 27, 2015 ■ $3.00 ■ WOMEN’S WEAR DAILY trouble, from agitating an already disgruntled work- WWD force to seeking a backer to buy the fi rm, moving ahead with arbitration and, tonight, appearing on ABC’s “20/20.” ■ Fourth-quarter losses widened as sales fell more than 9 percent and workers are being furloughed at the Los Angeles factory. ■ The brand is being reimagined with more of a social emphasis and some of the scantily clad sales associates long featured in its ads will be replaced with models. ■ Shareholders have sued the company, claiming it failed to maintain control of its colorful founder. Under Charney, American Apparel honed contro- versy to a high art and lurched from one loan with a sky- high interest rate to the next — always keeping just a step ahead of both the debt collector and Miss Manners.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 ANNUAL Reportpage 1
    2010N AN UAL REPORT 0526_cov.indd 2 4/7/11 10:30 AM COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN* Among The Warnaco Group, Inc., the Russell 2000 index, the S&P Midcap 400 index, the Dow Jones US Clothing & Accessories index $250 and the S&P Apparel, Accessories & Luxury Goods index COMPARISONCOMParisON OF OF 5YEAR 5-YEar CCUMULATIVEUMULatiVE TO TOTALtaL RE TRETURN*Urn* e Warnaco Group, Inc. compared to select indices $250 $200 250 250 $200 $150 200 200 $150 150 150 $100 $100 100 100 $50 $50 50 50 $0 0 0 $0 3/06 6/06 9/06 3/07 6/07 9/07 3/08 6/08 9/08 3/09 6/09 9/09 3/10 6/10 9/10 12/05 12/06 12/07 12/08 12/09 12/10 12/05 3/06 6/06 9/06 12/06 3/07 6/07 9/07 12/07 3/08 6/08 9/08 12/083/096/09 9/09 12/09 3/10 6/10 9/10 12/10 e Warnaco Group, Inc. Russell 2000 S&P MidCap 400 Dow Jones U.S. Clothing & Accessories The Warnaco Group, Inc. Russell 2000 S&P Apparel, Accessories & Luxury Goods *$100 invested on 12/31/05 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends. Fiscal year ending December 31. S&P Midcap 400 Dow Jones US Clothing & Accessories Copyright © 2011 S&P, a division of e McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2011 Dow Jones & Co. All rights reserved. S&P Apparel, Accessories & Luxury Goods *$100 invested on 12/31/05 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends.
    [Show full text]
  • Sexual Harassment and Corporate Law
    University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship 2018 Sexual Harassment and Corporate Law Daniel Hemel Dorothy Shapiro Lund Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/journal_articles Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Daniel Hemel & Dorothy Shapiro Lund, "Sexual Harassment and Corporate Law," 118 Columbia Law Review 1583 (2018). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW VOL. 118 OCTOBER 2018 NO. 6 ARTICLES SEXUAL HARASSMENT AND CORPORATE LAW Daniel Hemel * & Dorothy S. Lund ** The #MeToo movement has shaken corporate America in recent months, leading to the departures of several high-profile executives as well as sharp stock price declines at a number of firms. Investors have taken notice and taken action: Shareholders at more than a half dozen publicly traded companies have filed lawsuits since the start of 2017 alleging that corporate fiduciaries breached state law duties or violated federal securities laws in connection with sexual harassment scandals. Additional suits are likely in the coming months. This Article examines the role of corporate and securities law in regulating and remedying workplace sexual misconduct. We specify the conditions under which corporate fiduciaries can be held liable under state law for perpetrating sexual misconduct or allowing it to occur. We also discuss the circumstances under which federal securities law requires issuers to disclose allegations against top executives and to reveal settlements of sexual misconduct claims.
    [Show full text]
  • An Investigation Into American Apparel's Identification As a Socially Conscious Fashion Brand and How This Can Be Replicated I
    AN INVESTIGATION INTO AMERICAN APPAREL’S IDENTIFICATION AS A SOCIALLY CONSCIOUS FASHION BRAND AND HOW THIS CAN BE REPLICATED IN SOUTH AFRICA BY NALEDI AYANDA MATSHITSE THESIS submitted in the fulfilment of the requirements of the degree BACHELORS OF HONOURS IN BRAND LEADERSHIP at the VEGA SCHOOL OF BRAND LEADERSHIP CAPE TOWN SUPERVISOR: Jonathan Cane October 2015 1 COVER PAGE ABSTRACT CHAPTER 1 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY 1.1. Statement of Purpose 1.2. Possible Contributions to the Study CHAPTER 2 2. LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1. The American Apparel Brand Model 2.2. Consumer Anxiety 2.3. Sustainability 2.4. Fast Fashion 2.5. Contextualisation CHAPTER 3 3. RESEARCH DESIGN 3.1. Approach 2.2. Data Collection 2.3. Data Approach CHAPTER 4 4. RESEARCH FINDINGS & ANAlYSIS CHAPTER 5 5. CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATIONS REFERENCES 2 3 ABSTRACT This study will examine American Apparel‟s CSI‟s and socially conscious fashion ethos and determine whether or not it has been replicated in South Africa and if so, how? It will assess whether sustainability of a brand has any bearing on consumer behaviour with regards to a specific target market. The research study is rooted within the retail industry, thus it was imperative to the study to put into account the research approach for retail. Primary data is key in research when dealing with a specific area. Therefore, this study utilised a qualitative approach in order to gather primary data. Qualitative research lends itself to this study as it is based on consumers emotive response to a „conscious‟ brand and how this sways their buying decisions (Diamond, 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • American Apparel Wellness Program
    American Apparel Wellness Program American Apparel is a vertically integrated manufacturer and retailer of clothing for men, women, kids and dogs. American Apparel has consolidated all stages of production under one roof at their 800,000 square-foot factory. The business facility is located in downtown Los Angeles and every aspect of the production of garments, from the cutting and sewing, to the photography and marketing, is done in-house. Its goal is to make garments that people love to wear without having to rely on cheap labor. The challenge for companies like American Apparel is to establish new ways of doing business that are efficient and profitable without exploiting workers. To ensure the company’s success and stability, American Apparel sees all of its employees as long- term investments. American Apparel care about their employees health and well being. Therefore, the company provides the following benefits to its employees as a matter of policy: • Wages: American Apparel is committed to paying fair wages to its workers. Their workers are considered to be some of the highest-paid apparel employees in the country. • Job Security: American Apparel goal is to offer full-time and lifetime employment. • Health Care: American Apparel workers have access to company-subsidized health insurance for $12 per week. • Company Subsidized Meals: American Apparel employees are offered a $3 meal for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. In addition, different healthy options from the food vendors are available every day, such as, fresh fruits and vegetables platters. • Natural Light: American Apparel has one of the best-lit garment factories in Los Angeles.
    [Show full text]
  • A SURVEY of STANDARDS for the U.S. FIBER/TEXTILE/APPAREL INDUSTRY
    A Survey of Standards for the U.S. Fiber/Textile/Apparel lndustr y Craig 6. Pawlak U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Technology Administration National Institute of Standards and Technology Manufacturing Systems Integration Division Gaithersburg, MD 20899 April 1996 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Michael Kantor, Secretary TECHNOLOGY ADMl NlSTRATlON Mary L. Good, Under Secretary for Technology NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY Arati Prabhakar, Director DISCLAIMER No approval or endorsement of any commercial product, organization, or company by the National Institute of Standards and Technology is intended or implied. Certain commercial equipment, instruments, or materials may be identified in this report in order to facilitate understanding. Such identification does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor does it imply that the materials or equipment identified are necessarily the best available for the purpose. This publication was prepared by United States Government employees as part of their official duties and is, therefore, a work of the US. Government and not subject to copyright. A SURVEY of STANDARDS for the U.S. FIBER/TEXTILE/APPAREL INDUSTRY Craig G. Pawlak Manufacturing Systems Integration Division Manufacturing Engineering Laboratory National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, MD ABSTRACT This report documents a survey of standards relevant to the U.S. Fiber/Textile/Apparel (FTA) industry. The standards are discussed in four main groups-integration standards, test methods, quality standards, and standard reference data and materials. The Appendix of the report lists the titles of all standards found, grouped together by the organization responsible for them. Those organizations are also listed along with contact information for them.
    [Show full text]