In June 2016, the Federal Government Created the Special Parliamentary

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

In June 2016, the Federal Government Created the Special Parliamentary ]] In June 2016, the federal government created the Special Parliamentary Committee on Electoral Reform (ERRE) to identify and conduct a study of viable alternate voting systems to replace the first-past-the-post system, as well as to examine mandatory voting and online voting. We were hardly the first group of Canadian parliamentarians to have been tasked with examining our “winner-take-all” voting system to consider its flaws. The first committee met in 1921. That committee concluded that first-past-the-post was not a viable system for any democracy with more than two parties. Ever since the 1920s, Canada's federal parliament has had a minimum of three parties, and often as many as five or six. FPTP delivers skewed results in which "majority governments" are elected by a minority of the voters. Since then, more than a dozen efforts, provincial and federal, citizen assemblies and law commissions have all recommended that the quality of our democracy, the requirements of fairness will be better served once First Past the Post (FPTP) is gone and we move to a proportional voting system. As a team of 12 MPs from all five parties in the House of Commons, with a superb staff from House clerks to Library of Parliament analysts, we set records and broke new ground in consultations. With the advent of e-consultation, ERRE pioneered public input by online questionnaire. It was not an easy or quick process, and not entirely user-friendly, yet 20,000 people used that method to reach us. In addition, thousands more submitted briefs or letters. Hundreds attended our hearings in person, stepping up to an open mic to make their case. We took questions on Twitter. The input of hundreds of MP town halls also came to us. We held hearings in 19 locations, in every province and territory. We heard from hundreds of expert witnesses in political science, constitutional law and electoral systems as well as those with expertise in the challenges of voting for persons with disabilities, the poor and groups underrepresented in Parliament: women, minorities, indigenous persons. The submitted report, Strengthening Democracy in Canada: Principles, Process, and Public Engagement for Electoral Reform, was the result of this committee’s work. I hope that it may be of use as the province of British Columbia considers electoral reform. Sincerely, Elizabeth May, O.C. Member of Parliament Saanich-Gulf Islands Leader of the Green Party of Canada STRENGTHENING DEMOCRACY IN CANADA: PRINCIPLES, PROCESS AND PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT FOR ELECTORAL REFORM Report of the Special Committee on Electoral Reform Francis Scarpaleggia Chair DECEMBER 2016 42nd PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION Published under the authority of the Speaker of the House of Commons SPEAKER’S PERMISSION Reproduction of the proceedings of the House of Commons and its Committees, in whole or in part and in any medium, is hereby permitted provided that the reproduction is accurate and is not presented as official. This permission does not extend to reproduction, distribution or use for commercial purpose of financial gain. Reproduction or use outside this permission or without authorization may be treated as copyright infringement in accordance with the Copyright Act. Authorization may be obtained on written application to the Office of the Speaker of the House of Commons. Reproduction in accordance with this permission does not constitute publication under the authority of the House of Commons. The absolute privilege that applies to the proceedings of the House of Commons does not extend to these permitted reproductions. Where a reproduction includes briefs to a Standing Committee of the House of Commons, authorization for reproduction may be required from the authors in accordance with the Copyright Act. Nothing in this permission abrogates or derogates from the privileges, powers, immunities and rights of the House of Commons and its Committees. For greater certainty, this permission does not affect the prohibition against impeaching or questioning the proceedings of the House of Commons in courts or otherwise. The House of Commons retains the right and privilege to find users in contempt of Parliament if a reproduction or use is not in accordance with this permission. Also available on the Parliament of Canada Web Site at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca STRENGTHENING DEMOCRACY IN CANADA: PRINCIPLES, PROCESS AND PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT FOR ELECTORAL REFORM Report of the Special Committee on Electoral Reform Francis Scarpaleggia Chair DECEMBER 2016 42nd PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON ELECTORAL REFORM CHAIR Francis Scarpaleggia VICE-CHAIRS Scott Reid Nathan Cullen MEMBERS John Aldag Blake Richards Alexandre Boulerice Sherry Romanado Matt DeCourcey Ruby Sahota Gérard Deltell Luc Thériault Elizabeth May OTHER MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT WHO PARTICIPATED William Amos Georgina Jolibois Sheri Benson Pat Kelly Daniel Blaikie Hon. Jason Kenney Mike Bossio Tom Kmiec Sylvie Boucher Larry Maguire David Christopherson Alistair MacGregor Matthew Dubé David J. McGuinty Jim Eglinski John Nater Greg Fergus Monique Pauzé Colin Fraser Alain Rayes Bernard Généreux Hon. Michelle Rempel Garnett Genuis Brigitte Sansoucy David de Burgh Graham Gabriel Ste-Marie Jamie Schmale iii CLERKS OF THE COMMITTEE Christine Lafrance Danielle Widmer LIBRARY OF PARLIAMENT Parliamentary Information and Research Service Dara Lithwick, Analyst Erin Virgint, Analyst Gabrielle de Billy Brown, Research Assistant Jessica Ozorak, Research Assistant COMMITTEES AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES DIRECTORATE Ariann Bouchard, Committee Assistant Lynda Gaudreault, Committee Assistant iv THE SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON ELECTORAL REFORM has the honour to present its THIRD REPORT Pursuant to the order of reference of Tuesday, June 7, 2016, the Committee has studied the question of voting systems to replace the first-past-the-post system and the questions of mandatory voting and online voting and has agreed to report the following: v TABLE OF CONTENTS STRENGTHENING DEMOCRACY IN CANADA: PRINCIPLES, PROCESS AND PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT FOR ELECTORAL REFORM .................................................. 1 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................... 1 A. Electoral Reform and Canada’s Unique Democratic Ecosystem .......................... 1 B. The Committee’s Mandate ................................................................................... 3 C. The Committee’s Study in Numbers ..................................................................... 4 1. Formal Hearings .............................................................................................. 5 2. E-Consultation on Electoral Reform ................................................................ 6 3. Open Mic Sessions ......................................................................................... 8 4. Written Submissions and Correspondence ..................................................... 9 5. MP Town Hall Reports .................................................................................... 9 CHAPTER 2: ELECTORAL REFORM AND THE CONSTITUTION .............................. 11 A. Constitutional Basis of the Federal Electoral System and Implications for System Reform ................................................................................................... 11 1. Constitutional Provisions related to the Federal Electoral System and Reform .......................................................................................................... 11 2. Selected Canadian Jurisprudence: Electoral Reform and the Constitution ...... 14 B. Witness and Submission Observations on the Constitutionality of Electoral System Reform ................................................................................................... 15 CHAPTER 3: LESSONS LEARNED: A HISTORY OF ELECTORAL SYSTEM REFORM AT THE FEDERAL AND PROVINCIAL LEVELS .......................................................... 21 A. 1921: A Turning Point ......................................................................................... 22 1. The House of Commons 1921 Special Committee on Proportional Representation and the Subject of the Single Transferable or Preferential Vote ........................................................................................... 23 B. Subsequent Studies of Electoral System Reform at the Federal Level .............. 24 1. 1935-1937: The Special Committee on Elections and Franchise Acts .......... 24 2. A Trio of Task Forces/Royal Commissions: 1979, 1985, 1991...................... 24 3. Law Commission of Canada, Voting Counts: Electoral Reform for Canada, 2004 ................................................................................................ 25 4. House of Commons Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, Forty-Third Report (Electoral Reform) (tabled 16 June 2005) ........... 27 vii 5. Government of Canada, Public Consultations on Canada’s Democratic Institutions and Practices, 2007 .................................................................... 28 C. Electoral Reform at the Provincial Level ............................................................. 28 1. Early Reform Initiatives ................................................................................... 28 2. Recent Reform Initiatives ............................................................................... 29 a. British Columbia ......................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Core 1..39 Journalweekly (PRISM::Advent3b2 10.50)
    HOUSE OF COMMONS OF CANADA CHAMBRE DES COMMUNES DU CANADA 40th PARLIAMENT, 3rd SESSION 40e LÉGISLATURE, 3e SESSION Journals Journaux No. 2 No 2 Thursday, March 4, 2010 Le jeudi 4 mars 2010 10:00 a.m. 10 heures PRAYERS PRIÈRE DAILY ROUTINE OF BUSINESS AFFAIRES COURANTES ORDINAIRES TABLING OF DOCUMENTS DÉPÔT DE DOCUMENTS Pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Conformément à l'article 32(2) du Règlement, M. Lukiwski Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of (secrétaire parlementaire du leader du gouvernement à la Chambre Commons) laid upon the Table, — Government responses, des communes) dépose sur le Bureau, — Réponses du pursuant to Standing Order 36(8), to the following petitions: gouvernement, conformément à l’article 36(8) du Règlement, aux pétitions suivantes : — Nos. 402-1109 to 402-1111, 402-1132, 402-1147, 402-1150, — nos 402-1109 to 402-1111, 402-1132, 402-1147, 402-1150, 402- 402-1185, 402-1222, 402-1246, 402-1259, 402-1321, 402-1336, 1185, 402-1222, 402-1246, 402-1259, 402-1321, 402-1336, 402- 402-1379, 402-1428, 402-1485, 402-1508 and 402-1513 1379, 402-1428, 402-1485, 402-1508 et 402-1513 au sujet du concerning the Employment Insurance Program. — Sessional régime d'assurance-emploi. — Document parlementaire no 8545- Paper No. 8545-403-1-01; 403-1-01; — Nos. 402-1129, 402-1174 and 402-1268 concerning national — nos 402-1129, 402-1174 et 402-1268 au sujet des parcs parks. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-403-2-01; nationaux. — Document parlementaire no 8545-403-2-01; — Nos.
    [Show full text]
  • April 28, 2020 Honourable Catherine Mckenna Minister of Infrastructure
    April 28, 2020 Honourable Catherine McKenna Minister of Infrastructure and Communities [email protected] Dear Minister McKenna, We write as twenty (20) business organizations representing a broad cross-section of Manitoba’s economy collectively employing tens of thousands of women and men. Those industries include engineering & consulting, heavy civil and 2 vertical construction, commercial and residential development, manufacturing & exporting, retail, agriculture, commercial trucking and skilled trades. Our appeal to the federal government is that it assist in our provincial economic recovery by accelerating the approvals of and flexibility in the allocation from federal programs. Such measures would enable funding of key Manitoba projects that would immediately procure jobs, build legacy assets and be key instruments in help kick-staring Manitoba’s economy. The above is necessary to help correct the lack of confidence in the economy by all its sectors, the alarm, anxiety and fear of what lies ahead around the corner, and indeed where that corner is. That has led to private-sector projects being deferred or outright canceled. Those decision have resulted in lost jobs, supply and equipment sales, all of which reduces the collective ROI to GDP. Addressing consumer and investor confidence is critical to our recovery. In that regard, we understand the Province of Manitoba has communicated its commitment to flow its capital programs, harnessing investment in infrastructure to help Manitoba’s economy recover. We are told Manitoba has more than $6B in project submissions for the Investing in Canada Infrastructure Program (ICIP) with many being shovel ready. We urge the federal government to make the most of the current market conditions - competitive bid prices and extraordinarily low interest rates - to meet the formidable economic challenge in front of us.
    [Show full text]
  • Dealing with Crisis
    Briefing on the New Parliament December 12, 2019 CONFIDENTIAL – FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY Regional Seat 8 6 ON largely Flip from NDP to Distribution static 33 36 Bloc Liberals pushed out 10 32 Minor changes in Battleground B.C. 16 Liberals lose the Maritimes Goodale 1 12 1 1 2 80 10 1 1 79 1 14 11 3 1 5 4 10 17 40 35 29 33 32 15 21 26 17 11 4 8 4 2015 2019 2015 2019 2015 2019 2015 2019 2015 2019 2015 2019 BC AB MB/SK ON QC AC Other 2 Seats in the House Other *As of December 5, 2019 3 Challenges & opportunities of minority government 4 Minority Parliament In a minority government, Trudeau and the Liberals face a unique set of challenges • Stable, for now • Campaign driven by consumer issues continues 5 Minority Parliament • Volatile and highly partisan • Scaled back agenda • The budget is key • Regulation instead of legislation • Advocacy more complicated • House committee wild cards • “Weaponized” Private Members’ Bills (PMBs) 6 Kitchen Table Issues and Other Priorities • Taxes • Affordability • Cost of Living • Healthcare Costs • Deficits • Climate Change • Indigenous Issues • Gender Equality 7 National Unity Prairies and the West Québéc 8 Federal Fiscal Outlook • Parliamentary Budget Officer’s most recent forecast has downgraded predicted growth for the economy • The Liberal platform costing projected adding $31.5 billion in new debt over the next four years 9 The Conservatives • Campaigned on cutting regulatory burden, review of “corporate welfare” • Mr. Scheer called a special caucus meeting on December 12 where he announced he was stepping
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Internship Programme 2020-21 Annual Report
    Parliamentary Internship Programme 2020-21 Annual Report Annual General Meeting Canadian Political Science Association June 11, 2021 Dr. Paul Thomas Director Web: pip-psp.org Twitter: @PIP_PSP Instagram: @pip-psp Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ParlInternship/ PIP Annual Report 2021 Director’s Message I am delighted to present the Parliamentary Internship Programme’s (PIP) 2020-21 Annual Report to the Canadian Political Science Association (CPSA). The COVID-19 pandemic dramatically reshaped the experience of the 2020-21 internship cohort relative to previous years. Such changes began with a mostly-virtual orientation in September, and continued with remote work in their MP placements, virtual study tours, and Brown-Bag lunches over Zoom. Yet while limiting some aspects of the PIP experience, the pandemic provided opportunities as well. The interns took full advantage of the virtual format to meet with academics, politicians, and other public figures who were inaccessible to previous cohorts relying on in-person meetings. They also learned new skills for online engagement that will serve them well in the hybrid work environment that is emerging as COVID-19 recedes. One thing the pandemic could not change was the steadfast support of the PIP’s various partners. We are greatly indebted to our sponsors who chose to prioritize their contributions to PIPs despite the many pressures they faced. In addition to their usual responsibilities for the Programme, both the PIP’s House of Commons Liasion, Scott Lemoine, and the Programme Assistant, Melissa Carrier, also worked tirelessly to ensure that the interns were kept up to date on the changing COVID guidance within the parliamentary preccinct, and to ensure that they had access to the resources they needed for remote work.
    [Show full text]
  • Trudeau Attacks Calls to Close Borders: “There Is a Lot of Knee-Jerk Reaction That Isn’T Keeping People Safe”
    The road to Canada's COVID-19 outbreak, Pt. 3: timeline of federal government failure at border to slow the virus Author of the article: David Staples • Edmonton Journal Publishing date: April 3, 2020 • 29 minute read Prime Minister Justin Trudeau speaks from behind a podium bearing the hyperlink to a federal government website about the coronavirus disease during a press conference about COVID-19 in front of his residence at Rideau Cottage in Ottawa, on Sunday, March 22, 2020. JUSTIN TANG / THE CANADIAN PRESS Pt. 3, March: Trudeau attacks calls to close borders: “There is a lot of knee-jerk reaction that isn’t keeping people safe” COVID-19 exploded upon the world in March 2020, shutting down much of the economy in Europe and North America by mid-month, just as it had already done in Asia in January and February. But early in the month, the Liberal government in Ottawa clung to the notion that it must not close its borders to travellers, or quarantine them when they arrived, even as that was by then standard practice in Asia, and even as infection brought in by travellers were spreading in Canadian towns and cities. Yet by the end of the month, the Liberal policy did a complete about-face, shutting down our borders. In Parts 1 and 2, we looked at the multi-partisan in effort to dig in and question Canada‟s border policies on COVID-19. In Part. 3 of our series, the timeline is extended into March, detailing the key quotes and debates leading to the federal policy change.
    [Show full text]
  • July 29, 2021
    SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JULY 29, 2021 A Special Meeting of the Council of the City of Vancouver was held on Thursday, July 29, 2021, at 1:01 pm, in the Council Chamber, Third Floor, City Hall, for the purpose of convening a meeting which is closed to the public. This Council meeting was convened by electronic means as authorized under the Order of the Minister of Public Safety and Solicitor General of the Province of British Columbia – Emergency Program Act, updated Ministerial Order No. M192. PRESENT: Deputy Mayor Christine Boyle Councillor Rebecca Bligh Councillor Adriane Carr Councillor Melissa De Genova Councillor Lisa Dominato Councillor Pete Fry Councillor Colleen Hardwick Councillor Sarah Kirby-Yung Councillor Jean Swanson Councillor Michael Wiebe ABSENT: Mayor Kennedy Stewart CITY MANAGER’S OFFICE: Paul Mochrie, City Manager Karen Levitt, Deputy City Manager CITY CLERK’S OFFICE: Katrina Leckovic, City Clerk David Yim, Meeting Coordinator WELCOME The Deputy Mayor acknowledged we are on the unceded territories of the Musqueam, Squamish, and Tsleil-Waututh Nations and we thank them for having cared for this land and look forward to working with them in partnership as we continue to build this great city together. The Deputy Mayor also recognized the immense contributions of the City of Vancouver’s staff who work hard every day to help make our city an incredible place to live, work, and play. IN CAMERA MEETING MOVED by Councillor De Genova SECONDED by Councillor Wiebe THAT Council will go into meeting later this day which
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative North Americas: What Canada and The
    ALTERNATIVE NORTH AMERICAS What Canada and the United States Can Learn from Each Other David T. Jones ALTERNATIVE NORTH AMERICAS Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars One Woodrow Wilson Plaza 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, D.C. 20004 Copyright © 2014 by David T. Jones All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, scanned, or distributed in any printed or electronic form without permission. Please do not participate in or encourage piracy of copyrighted materials in violation of author’s rights. Published online. ISBN: 978-1-938027-36-9 DEDICATION Once more for Teresa The be and end of it all A Journey of Ten Thousand Years Begins with a Single Day (Forever Tandem) TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .................................................................................................................1 Chapter 1 Borders—Open Borders and Closing Threats .......................................... 12 Chapter 2 Unsettled Boundaries—That Not Yet Settled Border ................................ 24 Chapter 3 Arctic Sovereignty—Arctic Antics ............................................................. 45 Chapter 4 Immigrants and Refugees .........................................................................54 Chapter 5 Crime and (Lack of) Punishment .............................................................. 78 Chapter 6 Human Rights and Wrongs .................................................................... 102 Chapter 7 Language and Discord ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PANEL DISCUSSION on PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION Concordia University, Monday, September 19, 2016 7Pm-9Pm
    BRIEF to the attention of the Special Committee on Electoral Reform Francis Scarpaleggia, MP Scott Reid, MP Nathan Cullen, MP John Aldag, MP Alexandre Boulerice, MP Matt DeCourcey, MP Gérard Deltell, MP Elizabeth May, OC MP Blake Richards, MP Sherry Romanado, MP Ruby Sahota, MP Luc Thériault, MP PANEL DISCUSSION ON PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION Concordia University, Monday, September 19, 2016 7pm-9pm an event organized by Concordia University Young Greens McGill University Young Greens Fair Vote Canada Montreal Chapter brief prepared by William Gagnon President, Concordia University Young Greens Concordia University McGill University Montreal Chapter Panel Discussion on Proportional Representation Concordia University September 19, 2016 7pm-9pm PARTICIPANTS Kryzsztof Majewski, Representative, Fair Vote Canada 19h15-19h30 What is the current situation and why an electoral reform? Mr. Majewski informed the public of the current voting system in Canada along with its pros and cons. He presented his views -- also the views of the organization he represents, Fair Vote Canada -- of what a reformed electoral system meant for Canadians. On a more personal note, he said he prefers STV. Daniel Green, Deputy Leader, Green Party of Canada 19h30-19h45 Proportional representation and the views of the Green Party of Canada. Mr. Green quickly resummarized what proportional representation means in an electoral context. He then used Lego ™ blocks to make a comparative analysis of the results of the 2015 Canadian federal elections under a FPTP system versus a system using proportion- al representation. He introduced the concept of vote-poubelles, or lost votes (garbage votes in French), which, to him, disengages Canadian voters.
    [Show full text]
  • Myth Making, Juridification, and Parasitical Discourse: a Barthesian Semiotic Demystification of Canadian Political Discourse on Marijuana
    MYTH MAKING, JURIDIFICATION, AND PARASITICAL DISCOURSE: A BARTHESIAN SEMIOTIC DEMYSTIFICATION OF CANADIAN POLITICAL DISCOURSE ON MARIJUANA DANIEL PIERRE-CHARLES CRÉPAULT Thesis submitted to the University of Ottawa in partial Fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctorate in Philosophy degree in Criminology Department of Criminology Faculty of Social Sciences University of Ottawa © Daniel Pierre-Charles Crépault, Ottawa, Canada, 2019 ABSTRACT The legalization of marijuana in Canada represents a significant change in the course of Canadian drug policy. Using a semiotic approach based on the work of Roland Barthes, this dissertation explores marijuana’s signification within the House of Commons and Senate debates between 1891 and 2018. When examined through this conceptual lens, the ongoing parliamentary debates about marijuana over the last 127 years are revealed to be rife with what Barthes referred to as myths, ideas that have become so familiar that they cease to be recognized as constructions and appear innocent and natural. Exploring one such myth—the necessity of asserting “paternal power” over individuals deemed incapable of rational calculation—this dissertation demonstrates that the processes of political debate and law-making are also a complex “politics of signification” in which myths are continually being invoked, (re)produced, and (re)transmitted. The evolution of this myth is traced to the contemporary era and it is shown that recent attempts to criminalize, decriminalize, and legalize marijuana are indices of a process of juridification that is entrenching legal regulation into increasingly new areas of Canadian life in order to assert greater control over the consumption of marijuana and, importantly, over the risks that this activity has been semiologically associated with.
    [Show full text]
  • A Canadian Model of Proportional Representation by Robert S. Ring A
    Proportional-first-past-the-post: A Canadian model of Proportional Representation by Robert S. Ring A thesis submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Political Science Memorial University St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador May 2014 ii Abstract For more than a decade a majority of Canadians have consistently supported the idea of proportional representation when asked, yet all attempts at electoral reform thus far have failed. Even though a majority of Canadians support proportional representation, a majority also report they are satisfied with the current electoral system (even indicating support for both in the same survey). The author seeks to reconcile these potentially conflicting desires by designing a uniquely Canadian electoral system that keeps the positive and familiar features of first-past-the- post while creating a proportional election result. The author touches on the theory of representative democracy and its relationship with proportional representation before delving into the mechanics of electoral systems. He surveys some of the major electoral system proposals and options for Canada before finally presenting his made-in-Canada solution that he believes stands a better chance at gaining approval from Canadians than past proposals. iii Acknowledgements First of foremost, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude to my brilliant supervisor, Dr. Amanda Bittner, whose continuous guidance, support, and advice over the past few years has been invaluable. I am especially grateful to you for encouraging me to pursue my Master’s and write about my electoral system idea.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Assembly
    JOURNALS OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF THE PROVINCE OF NEW BRUNSWICK From the 24th day of October to the 17th day of November, 2017 From the 5th day of December to the 21st day of December, 2017 From the 30th day of January to the 9th day of February, 2018 From the 13th day of March to the 16th day of March, 2018 Being the Fourth Session of the Fifty-Eighth Legislative Assembly Fredericton, N.B. 2017-2018 MEMBERS OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Fourth Session of the Fifty-Eighth Legislative Assembly Speaker: the Honourable Christopher Collins Constituency Member Residence Albert Brian Keirstead Lower Coverdale Bathurst East-Nepisiguit-Saint Isidore Hon. Denis Landry Trudel Bathurst West-Beresford Hon. Brian Kenny Beresford Campbellton-Dalhousie* Vacant Caraquet Hédard Albert Saint-Simon Carleton Stewart Fairgrieve Hartland Carleton-Victoria Hon. Andrew Harvey Florenceville-Bristol Carleton-York Carl Urquhart Upper Kingsclear Dieppe Hon. Roger Melanson Dieppe Edmundston-Madawaska Centre** 0DGHODLQH'XEp (GPXQGVWRQ Fredericton-Grand Lake Pam Lynch Fredericton Fredericton North Hon. Stephen Horsman Fredericton Fredericton South David Coon Fredericton Fredericton West-Hanwell Brian Macdonald Fredericton Fredericton-York Kirk MacDonald Stanley Fundy-The Isles-Saint John West Hon. Rick Doucet St. George Gagetown-Petitcodiac Ross Wetmore Gagetown Hampton Gary Crossman Hampton Kent North Bertrand LeBlanc Rogersville Kent South Hon. Benoît Bourque Bouctouche Kings Centre William (Bill) Oliver Keirsteadville Madawaska Les Lacs-Edmundston Hon. Francine Landry Edmundston Memramcook-Tantramar Bernard LeBlanc Memramcook Miramichi Hon. Bill Fraser Miramichi Miramichi Bay-Neguac Hon. Lisa Harris Miramichi Moncton Centre Hon. Christopher Collins Moncton Moncton East Monique A. LeBlanc Moncton Moncton Northwest Ernie Steeves Upper Coverdale Moncton South Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Mass Cancellations Put Artists' Livelihoods at Risk; Arts Organizations in Financial Distress
    Prime Minister Justin Trudeau March 17, 2020 ​ Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland The Honourable Steven Guilbeault The Honourable William Francis Morneau Minister of Canadian Heritage Minister of Finance The Honourable Mona Fortier The Honourable Navdeep Bains Minister of Middle-Class Prosperity Minister of Innovation, Science and Industry Associate Minister of Finance The Honourable Mélanie Joly Minister of Economic Development and Official Languages Re: Mass cancellations put artists’ livelihoods at risk; arts organizations in financial distress Dear Prime Minister Trudeau; Deputy Prime Minister Freeland; and Ministers Guilbeault, Morneau, Fortier, Joly, and Bains, We write as the leadership of Opera.ca, the national association for opera companies and professionals in Canada. In light of recent developments around COVID-19 and the waves of cancellations as a result of bans on mass gatherings, Opera.ca is urgently requesting federal aid on behalf of the Canadian opera sector and its artists -- its most essential and vulnerable people -- while pledging its own emergency support for artists in desperate need. Opera artists are the heart of the opera sector, and their economic survival is in jeopardy. In response to the dire need captured by a recent survey conducted by Opera.ca, the board of directors of Opera.ca today voted for an Opera Artists Emergency Relief Fund to be funded by the association. Further details will be announced shortly. Of the 14 professional opera companies in Canada, almost all have cancelled their current production and some the remainder of the season. This is an unprecedented crisis with long-reaching implications for the entire Canadian opera sector.
    [Show full text]