The Three-Center, /- E Le C Tro N Chemical Bond

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Three-Center, /- E Le C Tro N Chemical Bond The Three-Center, /-Electron Chemical Bond Myriam S. de Giambiagi, Mario Giambiagi Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fisicas, 22290-180 Rio de Janeiro—RJ, Brasil Jorge Herrera Centro Latino Americano de Fisica, Av. Wenceslau Braz 71, fundos, 22290 R io de Janeiro—RJ, Brasil Z. Naturforsch. 49a, 754-758 (1994); received March 23, 1994 A definition is proposed for the number of electrons x involved in a three-center bond, based upon the corresponding two-center bond indices. The number of electrons is fractionary, ranging from about 1 to somewhat more than 4 in the systems considered here. It is seen that the sign of the three-center index does not depend on %■ Key words: Three-center bond; Multicenter bond indices; Active charge. 1. Introduction sical bond with population close to 2 with a small fluctuation from this value. The overwhelming major­ The concept of three-center bond is almost contem­ ity of population analysis, of which Mulliken’s [13] is porary of the Lewis two-center electron pair bond [1], by far the most popular, assigns a bond value of 1 , 2 , A distinction is made between two-electron (2e) and and 3 for single, double and triple bonds, respectively. four-electron (4e) three-center (3 c) bonds. or di- When all-valence-electrons calculations were intro­ borane are taken as paradigms of 3c-2e bonds and duced, Hoffmann’s EHT (extended Hückel theory) (FHF)“ of 3c-4e bonds [1]. [14] used M ulliken’s population analysis, which has We have introduced a three-center bond index [2] in the drawback of becoming zero for orthogonal bases. satisfactory agreement with certain experimental data. The other approximation dealing with all-valence- The values obtained have negative sign. Sannigrahi electrons at that time was C N D O (complete neglect of and Kar [3] affirm that 3 c bond indices have no chem­ differential overlap) with its alternative IN D O (in­ ical significance unless they are positive. In [4], it is complete neglect of differential overlap) and, in par­ asserted that negative values could be associated to ticular, the CNDO/2 variation [15]. Mulliken’s or­ (3c-2e) bonds, while positive values should indicate bital-orbital population lends itself to be contracted (3c-4e) bonds. We show elsewhere that the sign has a to an atom-atom population; CNDO orbital-orbital straightforward meaning [5] and here that in M O the­ population does not. In order to compare EH and ory the number of electrons taking part in such a bond CN D O /2 results, Wiberg [16] was obliged to devise a may be seen from a different viewpoint. new bond index for C N D O , by the way in a very The original Coulson bond order [6 ] has been de­ humble footnote. Trindle [17] proposed for it a sub­ vised for the ti electrons of alternant hydrocarbons; n division into self-charge and active charge analogous systems including heteroatoms led to bond orders to Mulliken’s atomic and overlap populations. which are not comparable with C - C bond orders [7]. MINDO/3 [18] and M NDO [19] came later. Almost universal consent assigns for example a bond A few years after the work of Wiberg, which did not order of 2 for the C = C bond in ethylene [8 ]. Very few receive the full deserved attention, we proposed a examples may be found in early literature which bond index which generalized Wiberg’s when non- throw ti population wholly on the bonds [9,10]. More orthogonal bases were used. Although we used it in recently, a theory considering fluctuations in orbital all-valence electrons calculations [7,20], nothing pre­ domains [1 1 , 1 2 ] describes these domains along a clas- vented taking into account the core electrons or en­ larging the basis. Reprint requests to Prof. D r. M ario Giambiagi, Centro Coming back to our three-center index, we are led Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fisicas, Rua Dr. Xavier Sigaud, 150, to seek an answer to the question; how many electrons 22290-180 Rio de Janeiro-RJ, Brasilien. are there in a three-center bond? 0932-0784/94 /0700-0754 $ 06.00 © - Verlag der Zeitschrift für Naturforschung, D-72027 Tübingen Dieses Werk wurde im Jahr 2013 vom Verlag Zeitschrift für Naturforschung This work has been digitalized and published in 2013 by Verlag Zeitschrift in Zusammenarbeit mit der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der für Naturforschung in cooperation with the Max Planck Society for the Wissenschaften e.V. digitalisiert und unter folgender Lizenz veröffentlicht: Advancement of Science under a Creative Commons Attribution Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 Lizenz. 4.0 International License. M. S. de G iam biagi et al. • The Three-Center, /-Electron Chemical Bond 755 2. The Three-Center Bond Index Sannigrahi and Kar [3] have made an interesting ob­ servation, namely that a higher-order bond index can­ We restrict ourselves to the ground state of closed- not generally be determined from a knowledge of shell systems, which can be described through a single- lower-order bonds. The summation in (7) includes the determinant wave function. The first-order density possibility of equal subindices {A, B o r C); i.e,, terms matrix is a mixed tensor [2 1 ] in one, two and three centers appear in N. IABC is invariant for any permutation of A, B ,C , cyclic [3] or 2 n ba= 2 Z x iax ‘b, (1 ) i not. This is easily seen when writing the tensor equiv­ alent to (2 ): where x ia(xib) are the covariant (contravariant) coeffi­ rbca_rabc___jbac /q\ cients of the i-th occupied M O . This tensor is repre­ *abc *cab *acb * sented by a matrix. We may build an orbital-orbital For the contraction to be carried out, the order of the tensor [2 1 ] indices is immaterial, as long as it involves a covariant i?a = 4 n bang, (2) with a contravariant index; however, it cannot involve the covariant and contravariant index of the same II which may also be represented by a matrix; this one matrix, for in this case the three-center ABC index is symmetric (otherwise, the tensor could not be repre­ splits into one-center and two-center indices. sented by a matrix), while the matrix in (1 ) is asymmet­ If we write the expression for IABC equivalent to (4) ric for non-orthogonal bases. In these cases, there ex­ for IAB, we obtain [5] ists a convention stating that the covariant index indicates rows and the contravariant index columns of <(4a ~< 4a >) (4b -< 4 b >)(4c - < 4 c » y = Iabc /2- (9) the corresponding matrix. Contracting the tensor in uses to be positive (although it is not positive (2 ) we obtain the bond index I AB for the bond (formal definite in non-orthogonal bases). Thus, (4) means that or not) linking atoms A and B [7,21] if qA fluctuates in one sense from its average value, qB iAB = 4 z n bari£. (3) fluctuates in the opposite sense. As to IABC, the three aeA fluctuations in (9) are not likely to be all in the same beB sense; if two are in one sense and one in the opposite This may be related with the correlation between the sense, either positive or negative values are to be fluctuations of the charges qA and qB from their aver­ found, with no evident connection at all with two or four age values [22,23]: electrons in the three-center bond. Recently, covalent bond orders have been proposed < (4 a - < 4 a » { 4b -Q b » > = - Ia b / 2, (4) [24] within the framework of Bader’s topological the­ ory of atoms in molecules [25]; they are compared 4 a being the charge operator and [22, 23] with Wiberg indices, stating (incorrectly) that both < 4 a > - 4 a = 2 Z n aa; iV = 2T ri7. (5) give zero for so-called noninteracting pairs of atoms aeA [24], On the contrary, Wiberg indices and their gener­ The idempotency of the 17 matrix allows us to write alization emphasize the role of “long bonds” or “sec­ [7,21] ondary bonds” [7,21,26,27]; they are most important in three-center bonds [2, 3, 4, 28, 29]. A sharing index has also been developed [8 ] and has been compared w - *-(i)(<“ +.S. 4 (6) with covalent bond orders [30], sharing indices being half of covalent bond orders in some cases and quite The charge qA is M ulliken’s gross population with a close in value in most of therm. We think that some of quite different partition into self-charge and active the values reported [8 , 24, 30] are too low when com­ charge [17]. pared with those one could expect from chemical intu­ Similarly [2] ition. We find, for example, that the indices for LiH should be closer to 1 [29]. N = ( ~ ) X l ABc\ W = (? ) Mayer [31] has proposed a model for three-center \ 4J A,B ,C bonds, where a single atomic orbital is assigned to beB ceC each of the three centers. This model is used in [4, 32, 756 M . S. de Giam biagi et al. ■ The Three-Center, ^-Electron Chemical Bond 33]. Reference [32] deals withIABC as being a (3c-2e) (4), the fluctuations of the qH's around their average index for the examples chosen. In [4], K ar states that values are either zero or not correlated to each other. qA + qB + qc = 2 for a (3c-2e) bond. It is curious that We have found this feature only for this type of com­ neither of them takes into account the partition into pounds, being thus, it seems, specific of the H H ' corre­ active and self-charge.
Recommended publications
  • Topological Analysis of the Metal-Metal Bond: a Tutorial Review Christine Lepetit, Pierre Fau, Katia Fajerwerg, Myrtil L
    Topological analysis of the metal-metal bond: A tutorial review Christine Lepetit, Pierre Fau, Katia Fajerwerg, Myrtil L. Kahn, Bernard Silvi To cite this version: Christine Lepetit, Pierre Fau, Katia Fajerwerg, Myrtil L. Kahn, Bernard Silvi. Topological analysis of the metal-metal bond: A tutorial review. Coordination Chemistry Reviews, Elsevier, 2017, 345, pp.150-181. 10.1016/j.ccr.2017.04.009. hal-01540328 HAL Id: hal-01540328 https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-01540328 Submitted on 16 Jun 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Topological analysis of the metal-metal bond: a tutorial review Christine Lepetita,b, Pierre Faua,b, Katia Fajerwerga,b, MyrtilL. Kahn a,b, Bernard Silvic,∗ aCNRS, LCC (Laboratoire de Chimie de Coordination), 205, route de Narbonne, BP 44099, F-31077 Toulouse Cedex 4, France. bUniversité de Toulouse, UPS, INPT, F-31077 Toulouse Cedex 4, i France cSorbonne Universités, UPMC, Univ Paris 06, UMR 7616, Laboratoire de Chimie Théorique, case courrier 137, 4 place Jussieu, F-75005 Paris, France Abstract This contribution explains how the topological methods of analysis of the electron density and related functions such as the electron localization function (ELF) and the electron localizability indicator (ELI-D) enable the theoretical characterization of various metal-metal (M-M) bonds (multiple M-M bonds, dative M-M bonds).
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Aromaticity
    Introduction to Aromaticity Historical Timeline:1 Spotlight on Benzene:2 th • Early 19 century chemists derive benzene formula (C6H6) and molecular mass (78). • Carbon to hydrogen ratio of 1:1 suggests high reactivity and instability. • However, benzene is fairly inert and fails to undergo reactions that characterize normal alkenes. - Benzene remains inert at room temperature. - Benzene is more resistant to catalytic hydrogenation than other alkenes. Possible (but wrong) benzene structures:3 Dewar benzene Prismane Fulvene 2,4- Hexadiyne - Rearranges to benzene at - Rearranges to - Undergoes catalytic - Undergoes catalytic room temperature. Faraday’s benzene. hydrogenation easily. hydrogenation easily - Lots of ring strain. - Lots of ring strain. - Lots of ring strain. 1 Timeline is computer-generated, compiled with information from pg. 594 of Bruice, Organic Chemistry, 4th Edition, Ch. 15.2, and from Chemistry 14C Thinkbook by Dr. Steven Hardinger, Version 4, p. 26 2 Chemistry 14C Thinkbook, p. 26 3 Images of Dewar benzene, prismane, fulvene, and 2,4-Hexadiyne taken from Chemistry 14C Thinkbook, p. 26. Kekulé’s solution: - “snake bites its own tail” (4) Problems with Kekulé’s solution: • If Kekulé’s structure were to have two chloride substituents replacing two hydrogen atoms, there should be a pair of 1,2-dichlorobenzene isomers: one isomer with single bonds separating the Cl atoms, and another with double bonds separating the Cl atoms. • These isomers were never isolated or detected. • Rapid equilibrium proposed, where isomers interconvert so quickly that they cannot be isolated or detected. • Regardless, Kekulé’s structure has C=C’s and normal alkene reactions are still expected. - But the unusual stability of benzene still unexplained.
    [Show full text]
  • Symmetry of Three-Center, Four-Electron Bonds†‡
    Chemical Science EDGE ARTICLE View Article Online View Journal | View Issue Symmetry of three-center, four-electron bonds†‡ b a c Cite this: Chem. Sci., 2020, 11,7979 Ann Christin Reiersølmoen, § Stefano Battaglia, § Sigurd Øien-Ødegaard, Arvind Kumar Gupta, d Anne Fiksdahl,b Roland Lindh a and Mate Erdelyi *a All publication charges for this article ´ ´ ´ have been paid for by the Royal Society of Chemistry Three-center, four-electron bonds provide unusually strong interactions; however, their nature remains ununderstood. Investigations of the strength, symmetry and the covalent versus electrostatic character of three-center hydrogen bonds have vastly contributed to the understanding of chemical bonding, whereas the assessments of the analogous three-center halogen, chalcogen, tetrel and metallic s^-type long bonding are still lagging behind. Herein, we disclose the X-ray crystallographic, NMR spectroscopic and computational investigation of three-center, four-electron [D–X–D]+ bonding for a variety of cations (X+ ¼ H+,Li+,Na+,F+,Cl+,Br+,I+,Ag+ and Au+) using a benchmark bidentate model system. Formation of a three-center bond, [D–X–D]+ is accompanied by an at least 30% shortening of the D–X Received 11th April 2020 bonds. We introduce a numerical index that correlates symmetry to the ionic size and the electron Accepted 19th June 2020 affinity of the central cation, X+. Providing an improved understanding of the fundamental factors DOI: 10.1039/d0sc02076a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence. determining bond symmetry on a comprehensive level is expected to facilitate future developments and rsc.li/chemical-science applications of secondary bonding and hypervalent chemistry.
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Concepts of Chemical Bonding
    Basic Concepts of Chemical Bonding Cover 8.1 to 8.7 EXCEPT 1. Omit Energetics of Ionic Bond Formation Omit Born-Haber Cycle 2. Omit Dipole Moments ELEMENTS & COMPOUNDS • Why do elements react to form compounds ? • What are the forces that hold atoms together in molecules ? and ions in ionic compounds ? Electron configuration predict reactivity Element Electron configurations Mg (12e) 1S 2 2S 2 2P 6 3S 2 Reactive Mg 2+ (10e) [Ne] Stable Cl(17e) 1S 2 2S 2 2P 6 3S 2 3P 5 Reactive Cl - (18e) [Ar] Stable CHEMICAL BONDSBONDS attractive force holding atoms together Single Bond : involves an electron pair e.g. H 2 Double Bond : involves two electron pairs e.g. O 2 Triple Bond : involves three electron pairs e.g. N 2 TYPES OF CHEMICAL BONDSBONDS Ionic Polar Covalent Two Extremes Covalent The Two Extremes IONIC BOND results from the transfer of electrons from a metal to a nonmetal. COVALENT BOND results from the sharing of electrons between the atoms. Usually found between nonmetals. The POLAR COVALENT bond is In-between • the IONIC BOND [ transfer of electrons ] and • the COVALENT BOND [ shared electrons] The pair of electrons in a polar covalent bond are not shared equally . DISCRIPTION OF ELECTRONS 1. How Many Electrons ? 2. Electron Configuration 3. Orbital Diagram 4. Quantum Numbers 5. LEWISLEWIS SYMBOLSSYMBOLS LEWISLEWIS SYMBOLSSYMBOLS 1. Electrons are represented as DOTS 2. Only VALENCE electrons are used Atomic Hydrogen is H • Atomic Lithium is Li • Atomic Sodium is Na • All of Group 1 has only one dot The Octet Rule Atoms gain, lose, or share electrons until they are surrounded by 8 valence electrons (s2 p6 ) All noble gases [EXCEPT HE] have s2 p6 configuration.
    [Show full text]
  • Bond Distances and Bond Orders in Binuclear Metal Complexes of the First Row Transition Metals Titanium Through Zinc
    Metal-Metal (MM) Bond Distances and Bond Orders in Binuclear Metal Complexes of the First Row Transition Metals Titanium Through Zinc Richard H. Duncan Lyngdoh*,a, Henry F. Schaefer III*,b and R. Bruce King*,b a Department of Chemistry, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong 793022, India B Centre for Computational Quantum Chemistry, University of Georgia, Athens GA 30602 ABSTRACT: This survey of metal-metal (MM) bond distances in binuclear complexes of the first row 3d-block elements reviews experimental and computational research on a wide range of such systems. The metals surveyed are titanium, vanadium, chromium, manganese, iron, cobalt, nickel, copper, and zinc, representing the only comprehensive presentation of such results to date. Factors impacting MM bond lengths that are discussed here include (a) n+ the formal MM bond order, (b) size of the metal ion present in the bimetallic core (M2) , (c) the metal oxidation state, (d) effects of ligand basicity, coordination mode and number, and (e) steric effects of bulky ligands. Correlations between experimental and computational findings are examined wherever possible, often yielding good agreement for MM bond lengths. The formal bond order provides a key basis for assessing experimental and computationally derived MM bond lengths. The effects of change in the metal upon MM bond length ranges in binuclear complexes suggest trends for single, double, triple, and quadruple MM bonds which are related to the available information on metal atomic radii. It emerges that while specific factors for a limited range of complexes are found to have their expected impact in many cases, the assessment of the net effect of these factors is challenging.
    [Show full text]
  • Single Covalent Bonds
    Single Covalent Bonds Ck12 Science Say Thanks to the Authors Click http://www.ck12.org/saythanks (No sign in required) AUTHOR Ck12 Science To access a customizable version of this book, as well as other interactive content, visit www.ck12.org CK-12 Foundation is a non-profit organization with a mission to reduce the cost of textbook materials for the K-12 market both in the U.S. and worldwide. Using an open-source, collaborative, and web-based compilation model, CK-12 pioneers and promotes the creation and distribution of high-quality, adaptive online textbooks that can be mixed, modified and printed (i.e., the FlexBook® textbooks). Copyright © 2016 CK-12 Foundation, www.ck12.org The names “CK-12” and “CK12” and associated logos and the terms “FlexBook®” and “FlexBook Platform®” (collectively “CK-12 Marks”) are trademarks and service marks of CK-12 Foundation and are protected by federal, state, and international laws. Any form of reproduction of this book in any format or medium, in whole or in sections must include the referral attribution link http://www.ck12.org/saythanks (placed in a visible location) in addition to the following terms. Except as otherwise noted, all CK-12 Content (including CK-12 Curriculum Material) is made available to Users in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC 3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc/3.0/), as amended and updated by Creative Com- mons from time to time (the “CC License”), which is incorporated herein by this reference. Complete terms can be found at http://www.ck12.org/about/ terms-of-use.
    [Show full text]
  • Bsc Chemistry
    Subject Chemistry Paper No and Title Paper 1: ORGANIC CHEMISTRY- I (Nature of Bonding and Stereochemistry) Module No and Module 3: Hyper-Conjugation Title Module Tag CHE_P1_M3 CHEMISTRY PAPER No. 1: ORGANIC CHEMISTRY- I (Nature of Bonding and Stereochemistry) Module No. 3: Hyper-Conjugation TABLE OF CONTENT 1. Learning outcomes 2. Introduction 3. Hyperconjugation 4. Requirements for Hyperconjugation 5. Consequences and Applications of Hyperconjugation 6. Reverse Hyperconjugation 7. Summary CHEMISTRY PAPER No. 1: ORGANIC CHEMISTRY- I (Nature of Bonding and Stereochemistry) Module No. 3: Hyper-Conjugation 1. Learning Outcomes After studying this module you shall be able to: Understand the concept of hyperconjugation. Know about the structural requirements in a molecule to show hyperconjugation. Learn about the important consequences and applications of hyperconjugation. Comprehend the concept of reverse hyperconjugation. 2. Introduction In conjugation, we have studied that the electrons move from one p orbital to other which are aligned in parallel planes. Is it possible for electron to jump from p orbital to sp3 orbital that are not parallelly aligned with one another? The answer is yes. This type of conjugation is not normal, it is extra-ordinary. Hence, the name hyper-conjugation. It is also know as no-bond resonance. Let us study more about it. 3. Hyperconjugation The normal electron releasing inductive effect (+I effect) of alkyl groups is in the following order: But it was observed by Baker and Nathan that in conjugated system, the attachment of alkyl groups reverse their capability of electron releasing. They suggested that alkyl groups are capable of releasing electrons by some process other than inductive.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 19 D-Block Metal Chemistry: General Considerations
    Chapter 19 d-block metal chemistry: general considerations Ground state electronic configurations Reactivity, characteristic properties Electroneutrality principle Kepert Model Coordination Numbers Isomerism Electron configurations Exceptions: Cr, Cu, Nb, Mo, Au, La, Ce, and others 1 Trends in metallic radii (rmetal) across the three rows of s- and d-block metals Lanthanide contraction Cr Fe Mn 2 First Ionization energies Standard reduction potentials (298 K) 3 Reactivity of Metals Os 2O2 OsO4 Fe S FeS n V X VX (X F,n 5; X Cl,n 4; X Br,I,n 3) 2 2 n October 27, 2014 http://cen.acs.org/articles/92/i43/Iridium-Dressed-Nines.html Oxidation States Most stable states are marked in blue. An oxidation state enclosed in [ ] is rare. 4 MnCO3 NiSO4 K3Fe(CN)6 CuSO4▪5H2O CoCl2 CoCl2▪6H2O 2 2 CrK(SO ) •12H O [Co(OH 2 )6 ] 4Cl [CoCl4 ] 6H2O 4 2 2 pink blue Chromophore: the group of atoms in a molecule responsible for the absorption of electromagnetic radiation. Colors of d-block metal compounds For a single absorption in the visible region, the color you see is the complementary color of the light absorbed. •Many of the colors of low intensity are consistent with electronic d-d transitions. •In an isolated gas phase ion, such transitions would be forbidden by the Laporte selection rule, which states Δl = ± 1 where l is the orbital quantum number. - •Intense colors of species such as [MnO4] have a different origin, namely charge transfer (CT) absorptions or emissions. These are not subject to the Laporte selection rule.
    [Show full text]
  • Covalent Compounds and Separation Techniques
    Covalent compounds and separation techniques C2 Topic 3 Covalent compounds C2 Topic 3: Part 1 Why do atoms form bonds? • Atoms of different elements can combine to form molecules or compounds by the formation of new chemical bonds • Bonds involve the electrons in the outer shells of atoms 1st shell holds a maximum of 2 electrons 2nd shell holds a maximum of 8 electrons 3rd shell holds a maximum of 8 electrons • Filled electron shells are very stable Why do atoms form bonds? • The atoms of noble gases have completely full outer shells and so are stable • This makes the noble gases very unreactive and so they do not usually form bonds • The atoms of other elements have incomplete outer electron shells and so are unstable • By forming bonds, the atoms of these elements are able to have filled outer shells and become stable Types of bonding • Different types of bonds are formed depending on the atoms involved: - Ionic bonding: between metal and non-metal atoms - Covalent bonding: between non-metal atoms only - Metallic bonding: between metal atoms only • All bonds involve electrons and all bonding involves changes to the number of electrons in the outer shell Covalent bonding • Non-metal atoms are held together by shared pairs of electrons, which form covalent bonds • The electrons used in these bonds come from the outermost electron shells of the atoms • Covalent bonding results in the formation of molecules Simple molecular, covalent molecules • Covalent bonds can form between atoms of the same element. For example, in hydrogen gas two hydrogen atoms form one hydrogen molecule H H H H • Each atom contributes one electron to the covalent bond allowing both atoms to have a full outer electron shell (the 1st shell can only have 2 electrons).
    [Show full text]
  • Types of Bonds: Covalent, Ionic, Hydrogen, and Van Der Waals Kimberly Hatch Harrison
    Types of Bonds: Covalent, Ionic, Hydrogen, and van der Waals Kimberly Hatch Harrison Chemical bonds allow atoms to be more stable by filling their valence shell of electrons. This can happen by an atom either sharing electrons with another atom (covalent bonds), or by completely transferring electrons to another atom (ionic bonds). Weak electrostatic attractions (hydrogen bonds and van der Waals interactions) also stabilize struc- tures, reversibly holding biochemical molecules together. There are four types of chemical bonds essential for life to exist. Covalent bonds, ionic bonds, hydrogen bonds, and van der Waals interactions all play important roles in biochemical structures and reactions. These bonds have varying strengths, and that is the fundamental reason why we need these various kinds of bonds. Sometimes you need a very strong bond, like when you’re building permanent struc- tures. Other times, you want a weak, reversible interaction, like when you have a hormone binding a receptor, and you need it to fall off so it doesn’t keep sending the signal forever. It’s a good idea to learn an example of each of these kinds of bonds. If you have an example molecule in mind, that can help keep the more abstract concepts clear. 4 Types of Chemical Bonds in Biology 1. Covalent Bonds A bond formed through the sharing of electrons between two atoms. Covalent bonds are either polar or nonpolar. The nature of the bond is determined by the electronegativities of the atoms in the bond. If their electronegativities are equal, the electrons are equally shared. This is a nonpolar covalent bond (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Hyperconjugation
    Hyperconjugation Chemistry (Honors) TDC-I, Paper-II, Group-B, Unit-I Dr. Abhishek Dubey Assistant Professor Department of Chemistry, Ram Jaipal College, Chapra References 1. Organic Chemistry by Jonathan Clayden, Nick Greeves, and Stuart Warren Publisher: Oxford University Press 2. Wikipedia Introduction Hyperconjugation was first described by Baker and Nathan in 1935 to describe the abnormal behavior of alkyl substituted compounds. Hyperconjugation is the donation of sigma bond electrons into an adjacent empty or partially filled p-orbital, which result in an increased stability of the molecule. Unlike the normal conjugation wherein, the pi electrons get delocalized in p-orbitals, here σ electrons move to p orbitals. It involves the delocalisation of C-H σ electrons. Hyperconjugation depends on the presence of α-hydrogen atoms. With the increase in number of such hydrogens, the electron releasing effect of alkyl group also increase. For example; The contributing structures involving σ electrons of C-H bond do not show any covalent bond between C and H. Hyperconjugation, therefore, is also called no bond resonance. This does not indicate that hydrogen is completely detached from the structure, but some degree of ionic character in the C-H bond and some single bond character between C-C bond. Hyperconjugation exists in the molecules having the following framework, i.e either alkenes or carbocations or free radicals having at least one α-H atom, but not in carbanions. alkene carbocation free radical Consequences and Applications of Hyperconjugation 1. Stability of alkenes Overlap of σ orbital of C-H bond with pi orbital of adjacent C-C double bond gives rise to canonical structures.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Bonding
    CHEMICAL BONDING 1 18 1A 8A 1 2 13 14 15 16 17 2A 3A 4A 5A 6A 7A 2 1+ 2+ 3- 2- 1- 3 1+ 2+ 2- 1- 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 4 1+ 2+ 3+ 4+ 5+ 3+ 2+ 3+ 2+ 2+ 2+ 2+ 3+ 2- 1- 5 1+ 2+ 3+ 4+ 5+ 2- 1- 6 1+ 2+ 3+ 7 2+ 3+ 3+ 3+ 3+ 3+ 3+ 3+ 3+ 3+ 3+ 3+ 3+ 3+ 3+ 3+ 3+ 3+ 3+ 3+ 3+ 3+ 3+ 3+ 3+ 3+ 3+ 3+ 3+ Neutral Atom Positive Ion by Negative Ion DR. STEPHEN THOMPSON MR. JOE STALEY The contents of this module were developed under grant award # P116B-001338 from the Fund for the Improve- ment of Postsecondary Education (FIPSE), United States Department of Education. However, those contents do not necessarily represent the policy of FIPSE and the Department of Education, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal government. CHEMICAL BONDING CONTENTS 2 Electronegativity 3 Road Map 4 Types Of Bonding 5 Properties Controlled By Chemical Bond 6 Polar Bonds 7 Metallic Bonding 8 Intermolecular Forces 9 Ions: Counting Electrons And Protons 10 Ionic And Atomic Radii 11 Ions And Energy 12 Lithium Fluoride 13 Crystal Packing 14 Crystal Packing 15 Crystal Packing 16 Covalent H2 17 Quantization 18 Bond Length And Strength 19 Strong And Weak Bonds 20 Strong And Weak Bonds 21 Covalent To Metallic 22 Electron Delocalization CHEMICAL BONDING ELECTRONEGATIVITY Hydrogen 1 Metals 18 Electronegativity 1A Metalloids 8A 2.1 2 Nonmetals 13 14 15 16 17 0 H 2A 3A 4A 5A 6A 7A He Group 18 0.98 1.57 2.04 2.55 3.04 3.44 3.98 0 Li Be B C N O F Ne 0.93 1.31 1.61 1.9 2.19 2.58 3.16 0 Na Mg 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Al Si P S Cl Ar 0.82 1 1.36 1.54 1.63 1.66 1.55 1.83 1.88 1.91
    [Show full text]