VIEWPOINT The Journal of Clinical Investigation

Clinical trials for COVID-19 should include sex as a variable

Evelyne Bischof,1,2 Jeannette Wolfe,3 and Sabra L. Klein4,5 1Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy. 2College of Clinical Medicine, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, China. 3Department of Emergency Medicine, UMass Medical School – Baystate Campus, Springfield, Massachusetts, USA. 4W. Harry Feinstone Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology and 5Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

The number of COVID-19 cases appears cases revealed that 13 of 26 states disaggre- Until recently, remdesivir was regard- to be comparable between men and wom- gated data using sex as a variable. Notably, ed as promising for COVID-19, but inter- en, but the severity of disease and death is all 13 states reported that men are twice as im published results are disappointing (8). two times greater for men than for women likely to die from COVID-19 (2), with pub- The still unpublished Adaptive COVID-19 (1, 2). History, including the 1918 influen- lished data from New York City revealing Treatment Trial reported a four-day dif- za pandemic, warned us that male biases male-biased death from COVID-19 in all ference in time to recovery (11 days vs. 15 in COVID-19 could occur. In this View- adults over the age of 20 (3). days) for patients on remdesivir, suggest- point, we focus on biological explanations, Disparities between men and women ing some benefit (9). Similar outcomes with a forward look at why clinicians and in outcomes of infectious diseases, includ- have been seen for favipiravir, lopina- biomedical researchers should consider ing those caused by pathogenic coronavi- vir, and ritonavir, with the latter causing sex as a biological variable that will affect ruses, are not new. During the 2002–2003 severe side effects (10). Some studies treatment outcomes for COVID-19. There SARS outbreak and the ongoing MERS showed that hydroxychloroquine and chlo- is a long history of not analyzing or report- outbreaks, a majority of patients were roquine caused a high number of harmful ing differences between women and men men, possibly because of predominantly and lethal casualties (11). All trials to date in the prophylactic or therapeutic treat- male contact with the animal reservoirs include both men and women, but take a ment of infectious diseases. We seek to for these (4, 5). However, sex-blind approach to the analyses of out- reverse this trend and call on investigators for many viral respiratory tract infections, come data, with no governmental guide- developing and testing therapeutic and including but not limited to coronaviruses, lines mentioning sex-specific prophylactic prophylactic approaches for COVID-19 to the prevalence and severity of infection or therapeutic recommendations (except design studies that are inclusive of male is greater for men (6). Preclinical studies for pregnant and postpartum women). The versus female differences in drug respons- show that in mice, males are significantly lack of consideration of sex biases in drug es, immunotherapies, vaccines, and non- more susceptible to infec- efficacy and reactivity inevitably may lead pharmacological interventions. tions, as they are less capable of controlling to increased adverse (potentially lethal) virus replication, exhibit more post-infec- reactions. A study of chloroquine treat- Disaggregating data by sex tion pulmonary damage, and have lower ment in Brazil, in which 24.7% of the sub- Initial reports from Wuhan involving immune responses than females (7). jects were female, was prematurely ceased more than 40,000 cases showed that men because of complications (especially accounted for nearly two-thirds of deaths, Drug efficacy arrhythmias and QTc prolongation, 25%) with more severe symptoms and reduced As of this writing, no antiviral agent has and lethality (17%). No sex disaggrega- recovery rates (1). This report provided the been FDA approved as a specific COVID-19 tion was provided for either outcome (12), first alarm and set a precedent for other treatment. For those drugs being tested in despite the fact that women are known countries to disaggregate their data by sex randomized clinical trials, there has been to suffer more from cardiac intricacies. (Figure 1). As reports emerged from Italy, no explicit consideration of sex biases in After the initial therapeutic and suggested Spain, France, and the United Kingdom, efficacy or adverse reactions. This occurs prophylactic use of hydroxychloroquine men have consistently been twice as likely despite studies showing clear and some- in patients with COVID-19 in March, the to die from COVID-19 as women, with the times profound differences in drug treat- FDA released a report on April 24, noting Global Health 50/50 initiative providing ment responses, including antivirals. Drug severe and lethal outcomes. It remains real-time sex-disaggregated data from most trials are typically designed and analyzed underreported whether most of these countries worldwide. Although the United without attention toward sex-specific dos- occurred in women. States has been less consistent with sex-dis- ages or differential side effects, while they Ongoing trials on hydroxychloro- aggregated reporting, a recent analysis of the should be considered in both novel and quine do not include sex-disaggregated 26 states with more than 2000 COVID-19 repositioned drugs. comparisons in their objectives. Available preliminary results of studies on remde- sivir and favipiravir also lack sex-specific Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists. Copyright: © 2020, American Society for Clinical Investigation. data on adverse reactions or appropriate Reference information: J Clin Invest. 2020;130(7):3350–3352. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI139306. dose adjustments. As long as drug trials

3350 jci.org Volume 130 Number 7 July 2020 The Journal of Clinical Investigation VIEWPOINT

hypoxic patients by using a combination of noninvasive ventilatory support devices and patient positioning (20). As there are sex-based differences in lung physiology including airway caliber, lung volumes, diaphragmatic excursion, accessory mus- cle mechanics, and abdominal fat distribu- tion (21), sex-disaggregated outcome data on different invasive and noninvasive ven- Figure 1. Sex-disaggregated COVID-19 data. The Global Health 50/50 research initiative provides tilatory modalities are crucial, but have not real-time sex-disaggregated data from countries worldwide (accessed May 3, 2020). Based on their been included in preliminary studies. analyses of data from 69 countries, 50% of the countries are sex-disaggregating COVID-19 cases, Another rapidly evolving area of deaths, or both. For the 44 countries that have sex-disaggregated COVID-19 cases, 34% report a male bias, 45% report a female bias, and 21% report no sex bias (i.e., 50% ± 1% for each sex). For the 45 interest is the increase in thrombotic/ countries reporting sex-disaggregated COVID-19 deaths, 87% report a male bias, 2% report a female thromboembolic events in patients with bias, and 11% report no sex bias (i.e., 50% ± 1% for each sex). COVID-19 (22). Although the main driv- er of these events is currently unknown, direct viral effects, secondary hypoxia, continue to enroll both men and women Empirical evidence illustrates that liver impairment, or the amplification of but fail to sex-disaggregate outcome data, females and males differ in outcomes fol- more classical risk factors, such as severe costly mistakes will continue. Current- lowing the use of therapeutic immuno- inflammatory response and immobility, ly, there are over 1000 registered trials therapies in autoimmune diseases, infec- have been suggested (23). A recent review on COVID-19, more than half of which tious diseases, and solid tumors. Females on this topic reinforced the importance of include pharmacologic intervention or tend to experience more immunotherapy- liberal prophylaxis, suggesting therapeutic observation, and seven completed trials. related adverse reactions (17). For immu- anticoagulation of all admitted high-risk Although the latter were open to both notherapies aimed at stimulating an COVID-19 patients who lack contraindica- sexes, none reported an objective to bal- immune response, e.g., vaccines, females tions and prophylactic anticoagulation in ance participants or compared outcomes develop stronger responses and may expe- outpatients with mild disease and a history between men and women. rience greater efficacy than males. In of venous thrombosis or immobility (23). contrast, immunotherapies that repress Importantly, sex-disaggregated results Immunotherapies an immune response, e.g., cytokine or have not been reported except for a single Immunotherapies for COVID-19 are checkpoint inhibitors, are reportedly more sentence in the Helms et al. paper, noting critical for mitigation of disease and efficacious in males (18, 19). One-size-fits- that 24 of the 25 patients with pulmonary eventual long-term protection against all approaches to immunotherapies will emboli were male (22). As both under- and SARS-CoV-2. Because a vaccine is not not work, and sex/ may contribute overanticoagulation can carry patient risk, yet available, other immunotherapies are to variable treatment success, including further sex-disaggregated information is being evaluated, including the use of con- adherence, in clinical settings. desperately needed. This information will valescent plasma from recovered donors become even more important if promising for therapeutic treatment of patients Nonpharmacological estrogen trials ensue, because exogenous with severe COVID-19 (13). In a small, management estrogen is known to increase the clotting prospective study in China, convalescent Sex differences may influence the neces- risk in women and in biological males plasma was shown to be safe and effective sity or effectiveness of nonpharmaceuti- undergoing gender-affirming hormonal at improving clinical symptoms and labo- cal interventions for severe COVID-19. therapy (24). ratory parameters, with some evidence of COVID-19 primarily impairs the lungs, reduced viral load (14). In this and other and the oxygen requirements of hospital- Conclusions planned studies in the United States, there ized patients range from supplementation In medical research, there is a long history is no mention of donor sex. For proof of with a simple nasal cannula to the extreme of not analyzing or reporting differences principle, a study in mice revealed that of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation between women and men in the presen- transfer of serum from immune female (ECMO). As early reported mortality rates tation and progression of disease, as well mice was significantly better at protect- of intubated COVID-19 were high, dis- as in the prophylaxis or therapy. This ing naive mice (both males and females) cussions arose as to how to best support occurs despite growing evidence that sex against influenza than was immune serum the respiratory needs of infected patients, differences exist in the biochemistry and from males (15). Immunotherapies that especially those who do not physiological- physiology of every organ system. Sex and limit characteristics of an inflammatory ly fit the typical acute respiratory distress gender differences also exist in the presen- cascade, e.g., the IL-6 inhibitor tocili- syndrome (ARDS) pattern and require tation and prognosis of diverse diseases. zumab, are being tested in studies that different ventilatory approaches. More- The underappreciation of how biological enrolled 86% males, with no indication of over, there has been an intentional shift and even social/cultural male-female dif- comparisons between the sexes (16). to avoid early intubation in moderately ferences can serve as treatment modifiers

jci.org Volume 130 Number 7 July 2020 3351 VIEWPOINT The Journal of Clinical Investigation

is a direct reflection of the antecedent of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in the lished online March 27, 2020]. JAMA. https:// excluding females from biomedical and New York City area [published online April doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.4783. 22, 2020]. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/ 14. Duan K, et al. Effectiveness of convalescent plas- clinical studies. We seek to reverse this jama.2020.6775. ma therapy in severe COVID-19 patients. Proc trend and call to action all investigators 4. Alghamdi IG, Hussain II, Almalki SS, Alghamdi Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020;117(17):9490–9496. developing and testing therapeutic and MS, Alghamdi MM, El-Sheemy MA. The pattern 15. Fink AL, Engle K, Ursin RL, Tang WY, Klein SL. prophylactic approaches for COVID-19 of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavi- Biological sex affects vaccine efficacy and pro- to design studies that are inclusive of rus in Saudi Arabia: a descriptive epidemiolog- tection against influenza in mice. Proc Natl Acad ical analysis of data from the Saudi Ministry of Sci USA. 2018;115(49):12477–12482. male-female differences in responses to Health. Int J Gen Med. 2014;7:417–423. 16. Xu X, et al. Effective treatment of severe drugs, immunotherapies, vaccines, and 5. Karlberg J, Chong DS, Lai WY. Do men have a COVID-19 patients with tocilizumab [published nonpharmacological interventions. higher case fatality rate of severe acute respira- online April 29, 2020]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. tory syndrome than women do? Am J Epidemiol. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2005615117. Acknowledgments 2004;159(3):229–231. 17. Klein SL, Morgan R. The impact of sex and 6. vom Steeg LG, Klein SL. SeXX matters in gender on immunotherapy outcomes. Biol Sex We thank Shirley Zou and Xin Zhaochen infectious disease pathogenesis. PLoS Pathog. Differ. In press. for graphics assistance. We also acknowl- 2016;12(2):e1005374. 18. Jawaheer D, et al. Significance of sex in achiev- edge the Gender and COVID-19 working 7. Channappanavar R, Fett C, Mack M, Ten Eyck ing sustained remission in the consortium of group for ongoing engagement and discus- PP, Meyerholz DK, Perlman S. Sex-based differ- rheumatology researchers of North America sion. EB would also like to acknowledge ences in susceptibility to severe acute respirato- cohort of rheumatoid arthritis patients. Arthritis ry syndrome coronavirus infection. J Immunol. Care Res (Hoboken). 2012;64(12):1811–1818. the Women’s Brain Project for discussions 2017;198(10):4046–4053. 19. Grassadonia A, et al. Effect of gender on the out- on the topic. SK received support from 8. Wang Y, et al. Remdesivir in adults with severe come of patients receiving immune checkpoint the NIH’s Office of Research on Women’s COVID-19: a randomized, double-blind, pla- Inhibitors for advanced cancer: a systematic Health (ORWH) and the National Insti- cebo-controlled, multicentre trial [published review and meta-analysis of phase III random- tute on Aging (NIA) Specialized Center of online April 29, 2020]. Lancet. https://doi. ized clinical trials. J Clin Med. 2018;7(12):E542. org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31022-9. 20. Caputo ND, Strayer RJ, Levitan R. Early Research Excellence (SCORE) on Sex Dif- 9. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious self-proning in awake, non-intubated patients in ferences (U54AG062333). Diseases. NIH clinical trial shows remdesivir the emergency department: a single ED’s expe- accelerates recovery from advanced COVID- rience during the COVID-19 pandemic. Acad Address correspondence to: Sabra Klein, 19. https://www.niaid.nih.gov/news-events/ Emerg Med. 2020;27(5):375–378. Department of Molecular Microbiol- nih-clinical-trial-shows-remdesivir-accelerates- 21. Han MK, et al. Female sex and gender in lung/ recovery-advanced-covid-19. Updated April 19, sleep health and disease. Increased understand- ogy and Immunology, Johns Hopkins 2020. Accessed May 12, 2020. ing of basic biological, pathophysiological, and Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 10. Cao B, et al. A trial of lopinavir-ritonavir in adults behavioral mechanisms leading to better health N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, Maryland hospitalized with severe COVID-19. N Engl J for female patients with lung disease. Am J Respir 21205, USA. Phone: 410.955.8898; Email: Med. 2020;382(19):1787–1799. Crit Care Med. 2018;198(7):850–858. [email protected]. 11. Juurlink DN. Safety considerations with chloro- 22. Helms J, et al. High risk of thrombosis in patients quine, hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection: a multicenter in the management of SARS-CoV-2 infection. prospective cohort study [published online 1. Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and CMAJ. 2020;192(17):E450–E453. May 4,2020]. Intensive Care Med. https://doi. important lessons from the coronavirus disease 12. Silva Borba MG, et al. Chloroquine diphosphate org/10.1007/s00134-020-06062-x. 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: summary in two different dosages as adjunctive therapy 23. Bikdeli B, et al. COVID-19 and thrombotic of a report of 72 314 cases from the Chinese of hospitalized patients with severe respiratory or thromboembolic disease: implications Center for Disease Control and Prevention [pub- syndrome in the context of coronavirus (SARS- for prevention, antithrombotic therapy, and lished online February 24, 2020]. JAMA. https:// CoV-2) infection: preliminary safety results of a follow-up [published online April 15, 2020]. doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.2648. randomized, double-blinded, phase IIb clinical J Am Coll Cardiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. 2. Klein SL, Dhakal S, Ursin RL, Deshpande S, Sand- trial (CloroCovid-19 Study). https://doi.org/10.1 jacc.2020.04.031. berg K, Mauvais-Jarvis F. Biological sex impacts 101/2020.04.07.20056424. Posted on medRxiv 24. Getahun D, et al. Cross-sex hormones and COVID-19 outcomes. PLoS Pathog. In press. April 16, 2020. acute cardiovascular events in transgender 3. Richardson S, et al. Presenting characteristics, 13. Shen C, et al. Treatment of 5 critically Ill patients persons: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. comorbidities, and outcomes among 5700 with COVID-19 with convalescent plasma [pub- 2018;169(4):205–213.

3352 jci.org Volume 130 Number 7 July 2020