DOCSLIB.ORG

Understanding the Effects of Poor Sanitation on Public Health, the Environment and Well-Being Homa Bay County - Report of Research Findings

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Understanding the Effects of Poor Sanitation on Public Health, the Environment and Well-Being Homa Bay County - Report of Research Findings Understanding the Effects of Poor Sanitation on Public Health, the Environment and Well-being Homa Bay County - Report of research findings June 2018 Kenya Country Office Ngong Lane, off Ngong Road P.O. Box 30776, 00100 Nairobi, Kenya Tel.: +254 724 463355 Email: [email protected] Executive Summary Poor sanitation is linked to diarrhoeal diseases, which are among the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in children under five. It is also associated with a number of infectious and nutritional outcomes which have great bearing on the health and well-being of the child. This study was conducted to gain more insights into the effects of poor sanitation on public health, the environment and well-being in Homa Bay County. The results of this case-control study show that the majority of adult respondents (the child’s caregiver) were females (85%), with the majority in both the case and control groups (41%) aged 30-39. A small proportion were aged under 19 (2.5% in the control group and 5.4% in the cases). A considerable proportion of respondents had basic education, with 27.5% of the control group and 31.3% of the case group having completed primary school and 18.9% and 15.8% in the control and cases categories respectively having completed secondary school. About 70% of the respondents lived in their own homes and about a quarter were renting (29% controls and 26.7% cases), with most of the homes being either one- or two- More bedroomed. The results suggest a potential link between household poverty and the respondents in incidence of child diarrhoea: the control group households had higher annual incomes than those in the case group and more control families were in the middle wealth the control had quintile than case families. More households in the case group (73.8%) had borrowed heard sanitation money, food or other items in the past month than in the control group (69%). messages Most of the families (over 60%) had a family member who had ever been diagnosed with some type of chronic illness. The findings suggest that the households have good healthcare seeking behaviour: in about 90% of the households in both categories, sick family members sought treatment and in over two-thirds of the households, they sought treatment in a public health facility. Most paid money for the treatment: more case households (73%) paid for healthcare (in general) than those from the controls (62%). The results show that besides malaria, sanitation-related illnesses are the most common reason the community seeks treatment and that case households bear a bigger burden of sanitation-related illness, compared to the control households. The findings suggest that recurrent diarrhoea in children is likely to be common among the cases: more of the children in the case category had suffered diarrhoea in the two weeks before the survey. Overall, more respondents in the control group had heard messages related to sanitation than did those in the case group, which suggests that exposure to these messages has a link with a child having diarrhoea. The study findings also show a clear link between the household source of water and a child having diarrhoea, but no link between infant feeding practices and the child having diarrhoea. More households in the control group used protected water sources than those in the case group. However, tests on the water collected show that over half of the sampled households in Homa Bay were using water that was contaminated and unfit for human consumption: laboratory tests show that 52% of the water samples collected were contaminated with Escherichia coli (E. coli), a clear indication of contamination with faecal matter. Hand washing was reported to be common, but a physical examination of the homestead by the study team failed to find evidence of using soap in a majority of the homes. The majority of the caregivers said they washed hands after using the toilet, with more caregivers in the control group washing hands (94.8%) than in the case group (86.6%). More caregivers in the control group also reported washing hands before cooking (66%) than in the case group (60%). But the lack of soap suggests that, despite what they reported, most households use water only to wash hands after toilet use, which is inadequate. Understanding the Effects of Poor Sanitation on Public Health and Nutrition - Homa Bay County 1 Most of the households in both groups use unimproved sanitation facilities (traditional pit latrine) and more case households practice open defecation (13.3%) than controls (9%), suggesting a strong link with the child having diarrhoea. Although small in proportion, slightly more households in the case group left a child’s stool in the open (5.4% compared to 3% in the control group) or rinsed it off in a ditch or drain 13.3% of cases (7% compared to 3% in the control group). An analysis of faecal sludge management in the county also reveals that over half of the faecal sludge in the practice open county (52%) is unsafely managed or disposed of, meaning that significant amounts defecation of excreta end up in the environment, polluting water sources. Most respondents (over 60%) in both groups said they use chlorine to treat the water, but about 20% said they do nothing. The study results show that poor sanitation is linked to social discrimination and exclusion of some groups in Homa Bay County, as a result of their inability to have or to use proper sanitation facilities. These groups include the elderly, young children and people living with disability, who may not be able to use the conventional pit latrines. Some of the findings also suggest that there may be security concerns that prevent some groups from using household toilets at night and that some cultural norms also impact on access to sanitation for some groups. To address the challenges established through this study, it is recommended that the county government and partners take action to, among other things, improve sanitation coverage and promote public education on sanitation and hygiene. The county should put more efforts into securing the quality of drinking water by increasing improved water supply. This can be achieved by developing new water points and upgrading existing unimproved sources. Improving access to clean water supply not only increases the quantity of clean water available for household consumption but also allows households to save much time by reducing the distance between each household and the nearest water access point. A collapsed latrine in Wang’chieng Understanding the Effects of Poor Sanitation on Public Health and Nutrition - Homa Bay County 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 1 Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................... 3 List of Tables and Figures ......................................................................................................... 4 List of Abbreviations ................................................................................................................. 5 Chapter 1: Introduction ............................................................................................................. 6 Chapter 2: Study Design and Justification ..............................................................................10 2.1 Methodology Overview ............................................................................................... 11 2.2 Sampling .................................................................................................................. 12 2.3 Data collection techniques ........................................................................................... 12 Chapter 3: Key Findings ..........................................................................................................16 3.1 Socio-economic status of selected families and household characteristics ........................... 17 3.2 Effects of poor sanitation on public health, the environment and well-being for the different groups in the county population......................................................................................... 20 3.3 Social effects of poor sanitation on different groups (age, gender, ability) in the country population ........................................................................................................... 31 3.4 Political role and economic cost of poor sanitation in the selected counties ......................... 33 3.5 Effects of poor sanitation on the environment ................................................................ 34 3.6 Implementation of sanitation activities by Homa Bay County ............................................ 35 Chapter 4: Conclusions and Recommendations .................................................................... 38 Annex: Water testing protocol used in this study .................................................................. 42 Understanding the Effects of Poor Sanitation on Public Health and Nutrition - Homa Bay County 3 List of Tables and Figures Table 1: Summary of data collection methods used in the study ............................................. 14 Table 2: Proportion of children who had diarrhoea in the two weeks prior to the study and the treatment received .......................................................................................................... 21 Table 3: Breastfeeding
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cholera Outbreak Has Affected 7 Counties: Nairobi, Migori, Homa Bay, Bomet, Mombasa, Nakuru and Muranga Counties
    MINISTRY OF HEALTH CHOLERA SITUATION REPORT IN KENYA AS AT 5TH MAY 2015 Weekly Situation Summary Since 26th December 2014, Cholera outbreak has affected 7 counties: Nairobi, Migori, Homa Bay, Bomet, Mombasa, Nakuru and Muranga Counties. Migori, Homabay and Bomet Cholera outbreaks are now considered successfully controlled The outbreak first started in Nairobi County on 26th December 2014. Later the outbreak was reported in Migori County on 30th January 2015, Homa Bay County on 2nd February 2015, Bomet County on 12th March 2015, Mombasa County on 6th April 2015, Nakuru 8th April and Muranga county on 18th April 2015. As of 5th May 2015, a total of 2156 cases and 42 deaths (CFR=1.9%) had been reported nationally distributed as follows: Nairobi 145 cases, 5 deaths (CFR 3.4%); Migori 915 cases, 12 deaths (CFR 1.3%); Homa Bay 377 cases, 5 deaths (CFR 1.4%) , Bomet 272 cases, 2 deaths (CFR 1.5%) ,Mombasa 69 cases, 5 deaths (CFR 7.2%), Muranga 278 cases, 1 death (0.4%), and Nakuru 100 cases, 12 deaths (CFR 12%) Cumulatively, 274 new cases were reported in the last one week (164 in Muranga, 73 in Nakuru, 17 in Mombasa and 20 in Nairobi). This is an increase from the previous week where 35 new cases were reported. 6 new deaths were reported in the last one week (5 in Nakuru and 1 in Nairobi). There are 34 current admissions in Mombasa, Nakuru and Nairobi Counties. 1 | Page New cases reported in Nairobi were detected in new epicentres- Kibera, Mukuru Kayiaba and Mukuru Kwa Njenga slums.
    [Show full text]
  • Registered Voters Per Constituency for 2017 General Elections
    REGISTERED VOTERS PER CONSTITUENCY FOR 2017 GENERAL ELECTIONS COUNTY_ CONST_ NO. OF POLLING COUNTY_NAME CONSTITUENCY_NAME VOTERS CODE CODE STATIONS 001 MOMBASA 001 CHANGAMWE 86,331 136 001 MOMBASA 002 JOMVU 69,307 109 001 MOMBASA 003 KISAUNI 126,151 198 001 MOMBASA 004 NYALI 104,017 165 001 MOMBASA 005 LIKONI 87,326 140 001 MOMBASA 006 MVITA 107,091 186 002 KWALE 007 MSAMBWENI 68,621 129 002 KWALE 008 LUNGALUNGA 56,948 118 002 KWALE 009 MATUGA 70,366 153 002 KWALE 010 KINANGO 85,106 212 003 KILIFI 011 KILIFI NORTH 101,978 182 003 KILIFI 012 KILIFI SOUTH 84,865 147 003 KILIFI 013 KALOLENI 60,470 123 003 KILIFI 014 RABAI 50,332 93 003 KILIFI 015 GANZE 54,760 132 003 KILIFI 016 MALINDI 87,210 154 003 KILIFI 017 MAGARINI 68,453 157 004 TANA RIVER 018 GARSEN 46,819 113 004 TANA RIVER 019 GALOLE 33,356 93 004 TANA RIVER 020 BURA 38,152 101 005 LAMU 021 LAMU EAST 18,234 45 005 LAMU 022 LAMU WEST 51,542 122 006 TAITA TAVETA 023 TAVETA 34,302 79 006 TAITA TAVETA 024 WUNDANYI 29,911 69 006 TAITA TAVETA 025 MWATATE 39,031 96 006 TAITA TAVETA 026 VOI 52,472 110 007 GARISSA 027 GARISSA TOWNSHIP 54,291 97 007 GARISSA 028 BALAMBALA 20,145 53 007 GARISSA 029 LAGDERA 20,547 46 007 GARISSA 030 DADAAB 25,762 56 007 GARISSA 031 FAFI 19,883 61 007 GARISSA 032 IJARA 22,722 68 008 WAJIR 033 WAJIR NORTH 24,550 76 008 WAJIR 034 WAJIR EAST 26,964 65 008 WAJIR 035 TARBAJ 19,699 50 008 WAJIR 036 WAJIR WEST 27,544 75 008 WAJIR 037 ELDAS 18,676 49 008 WAJIR 038 WAJIR SOUTH 45,469 119 009 MANDERA 039 MANDERA WEST 26,816 58 009 MANDERA 040 BANISSA 18,476 53 009 MANDERA
    [Show full text]
  • Addressing Sexual Violence and HIV Risk Among Married Adolescent Girls in Rural Nyanza, Kenya Prepared by Chi-Chi Undie
    promoting healthy, safe, and productive transitions to adulthood Brief no. 19 March 2011 Addressing sexual violence and HIV risk among married adolescent girls in rural Nyanza, Kenya Prepared by Chi-Chi Undie arried adolescent girls form a large segment of Kenyan youth, yet they are largely overlooked by researchers and program Mmanagers concerned with the lives of adolescents. As evidence demonstrates, this neglected population of married girls is likely to be vulnerable and in need of support. HIV infection is much higher among adolescent girls in sub-Saharan Africa than among boys. In settings such as Nyanza Province, Kenya, rates of HIV infection are extremely high, and evidence is increasing in some settings that girls who are mar- ried are much more likely to be infected with HIV, compared with their unmarried sexually active counterparts. Sexual violence and HIV/AIDS are a lethal combination. Research indicates that the risk of HIV infection following forced sex is likely to be higher than following consensual sex. Finding ways to tackle sexual violence and HIV infection simultaneously has therefore become a major public health endeavor. Married adolescent girls are particularly vulnerable to sexual vio- lence; however, there is a lack of data to guide intervention efforts specifically for such girls because they have largely remained invisible in programs. This brief describes a program addressing the problem of sex- ual violence and the risk of HIV transmission within marriage in Kenya’s Nyanza Province. The program was based on the Population Council’s analysis of the 2003 Kenya Demographic and Health Survey (KDHS) as well as on formative research within rural Nyanza.
    [Show full text]
  • A Nsw Public Health Laboratory Network
    A NSW PUBLIC HEALTH LABORATORY NETWORK John Rooney formerly Specialist Medical Adviser AIDS/Infectious Diseases Branch, NSW Health Department ROLES OF DESIGNATED PUBLIC hIEALTH LABORATORIES •Capacity to respond to Statewide public health his article outlines a proposal to establish a Public requirements, including outbreak investigations, in THealth Laboratory Network (PHLN) in NSW, designed conjunction with the N5W Health Department. to meet requirements for high quality public health • Policy development (e.g. as a result of changing laboratory services and laboratory expertise by building on patterns of antibiotic resistance). existing services and facilities. The proposed PHLN, with • Education (e.g. the development and updating of the State's network of Public Health Units and the NSW testing algorithms for general practitioners and public Health Department's AIDS/Infectious Diseases and health practitioners). Environmental Health, Food and Nutrition Branches, will • Providing a Statewide and/or national reference provide an integrated public health service for the laboratory function. surveillance and control of infectious diseases, and the • Coordinating the NSW contribution to State, national capacity to monitor the safety of food arid water and the risk and international laboratory networks to facilitate the of harm from exposure to toxic substances in the collation and analysis of epidemiological data. environment. • Analysis and reporting of Statewide data in conjunction with the NSW Health Department. The PHLN will comprise a network of public health • Providing advice on changes in technology and laboratories formally designated to provide specified opportunities for improved efficiency in the services. Individual laboratories will represent foci of laboratory contribution to public health Statewide expertise in specific public health areas, while in investigations.
    [Show full text]
  • Download List of Physical Locations of Constituency Offices
    INDEPENDENT ELECTORAL AND BOUNDARIES COMMISSION PHYSICAL LOCATIONS OF CONSTITUENCY OFFICES IN KENYA County Constituency Constituency Name Office Location Most Conspicuous Landmark Estimated Distance From The Land Code Mark To Constituency Office Mombasa 001 Changamwe Changamwe At The Fire Station Changamwe Fire Station Mombasa 002 Jomvu Mkindani At The Ap Post Mkindani Ap Post Mombasa 003 Kisauni Along Dr. Felix Mandi Avenue,Behind The District H/Q Kisauni, District H/Q Bamburi Mtamboni. Mombasa 004 Nyali Links Road West Bank Villa Mamba Village Mombasa 005 Likoni Likoni School For The Blind Likoni Police Station Mombasa 006 Mvita Baluchi Complex Central Ploice Station Kwale 007 Msambweni Msambweni Youth Office Kwale 008 Lunga Lunga Opposite Lunga Lunga Matatu Stage On The Main Road To Tanzania Lunga Lunga Petrol Station Kwale 009 Matuga Opposite Kwale County Government Office Ministry Of Finance Office Kwale County Kwale 010 Kinango Kinango Town,Next To Ministry Of Lands 1st Floor,At Junction Off- Kinango Town,Next To Ministry Of Lands 1st Kinango Ndavaya Road Floor,At Junction Off-Kinango Ndavaya Road Kilifi 011 Kilifi North Next To County Commissioners Office Kilifi Bridge 500m Kilifi 012 Kilifi South Opposite Co-Operative Bank Mtwapa Police Station 1 Km Kilifi 013 Kaloleni Opposite St John Ack Church St. Johns Ack Church 100m Kilifi 014 Rabai Rabai District Hqs Kombeni Girls Sec School 500 M (0.5 Km) Kilifi 015 Ganze Ganze Commissioners Sub County Office Ganze 500m Kilifi 016 Malindi Opposite Malindi Law Court Malindi Law Court 30m Kilifi 017 Magarini Near Mwembe Resort Catholic Institute 300m Tana River 018 Garsen Garsen Behind Methodist Church Methodist Church 100m Tana River 019 Galole Hola Town Tana River 1 Km Tana River 020 Bura Bura Irrigation Scheme Bura Irrigation Scheme Lamu 021 Lamu East Faza Town Registration Of Persons Office 100 Metres Lamu 022 Lamu West Mokowe Cooperative Building Police Post 100 M.
    [Show full text]
  • Usg Humanitarian Assistance to Kenya
    USG HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE TO KENYA 35° 36° 37° 38° 39° 40°Original Map Courtesy 41° of the UN Cartographic Section 42° SUDAN The boundaries and names used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance Todenyang COUNTRYWIDE by the U.S. Government. Banya ETHIOPIA Lokichokio KRCS Sabarei a UNICEF 4° F 4° RIFT VALLEY Banissa WFP Ramu Mandera ACTED Kakuma ACRJ Lokwa UNHCR Kangole p ManderaMandera Concern CF Moyale Takaba IFRC North Horr Lodwar IMC F MoyaleMoyale 3° El NORTHWak EASTERN 3° Merlin F Loiyangalani FH FilmAid TurkanaTurkana Buna AC IRC MarsabitMarsabit Mercy USA F J j D Lokichar JRS k WASDA J j Marsabit WajirWajir Tarbaj CARE LWR ikp EASTERNEASTERN Vj J 2° Girito Salesian Missions Lokori Center for 2° S Victims of Torture k Baragoi EASTERN World University Laisamis Wajir of Canada V FH FilmAid WestWest AC PokotPokot NORTHNORTH Handicap Int. RIFTR I F T VALLEYVA L L E Y SamburuSamburu EASTERNEASTERN IRC UGANDA Tot j D Maralal TransTrans NzoiaNzoia MarakwetMarakwet Archer's LWR 1° MtMt Kitale BaringoBaringo Dif ikp 1° Kisima Post Habaswein ElgonElgon NRC LugariLugari Lorule S I WESTERNWESTERN UasinUasin SC BungomaBungoma GishuGishu Mado Gashi G TesoTeso Marigat IsioloIsiolo Busia Webuye Eldoret KeiyoKeiyo Isiolo World UniversityLiboi KakamegaKakamega Lare Kinna of Canada V Burnt Nyahururu LaikipiaLaikipia BusiaBusia Kakamega Forest Butere NandiNandi KoibatekKoibatek (Thomson's Falls) MeruMeru NorthNorth Nanyuki Dadaab SiayaSiaya VihigaVihiga Subukia Mogotio Meru 0° Kipkelion MeruMeru 0° Londiani a KisumuKisumu
    [Show full text]
  • (IMCI) Implementation in Kenya
    A Case Study of Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) Implementation in Kenya K Mullei, F Wafula, C Goodman October 2008 This paper is an output of the Consortium for Research on Equitable Health Systems. The authors are based at the Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), Kenya. Kenya Medical Research Institute, PO Box 43640, 00100 GP, Nairobi, Kenya. 1 ABOUT CREHS The Consortium for Research on Equitable Health Systems (CREHS) is a five year DFID funded Research Programme Consortium that is made up of eight organisations based in Kenya, India, Nigeria, South Africa, Tanzania, Thailand and the United Kingdom. It aims to generate knowledge about how to strengthen health systems, policies and interventions in ways which preferentially benefit the poorest. The research is organised in four themes: health sector reform, financial risk protection, health workforce performance and scaling up. The consortium will achieve its aim by: • working in partnership to develop research • strengthening the capacity of partners to undertake relevant research and of policymakers to use research effectively • communicating findings in a timely, accessible and appropriate manner so as to influence local and global policy development For more information about CREHS please contact: Consortium for Research on Equitable Health Systems (CREHS) London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, UK WC1E 7HT Email: [email protected] Website: www.crehs.lshtm.ac.uk ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to thank the following organisations and individuals for their valuable contributions and support in preparing this report: the members of the Division of Child Health; representatives of national and local development partners; and the District Health Management Teams and health workers in Malindi and Homa Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • The Power of Public Health Surveillance Public Health Approach
    DOI: 10.32481/djph.2020.07.016 The Power of Public Health Surveillance Rick Hong, MD; Rebecca Walker, PhD, JD, MSN; Gregory Hovan; Lisa Henry, MHSA; Rick Pescatore, DO Delaware Division of Public Health Never has an emergency battered Delaware to such public health, economic, social, and emotional extremes like the one presented by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Strict disease mitigation strategies were led by Governor John Carney’s March 22, 2020 State of Emergency declaration that closed non-essential businesses and schools, and included a Stay-at- Home order. As of June 11, 2020, the state is experiencing fewer hospitalizations and deaths due to COVID-19. The decreasing trends in the percentage of positive COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations1 were the result of many statewide infection control measures such as closures of non-essential businesses, use of face coverings, social distancing, general hand hygiene, and community testing. As Delaware reopens in phases, the Delaware Department of Health and Social Services, Division of Public Health (DPH) – the state’s lead health agency – is conducting public health surveillance. Case investigations and contact tracing have impacted disease transmission rates by identifying those needing isolation or quarantine. These measures will continue as our society moves towards normalcy. Public Health Approach Public health issues are diverse and dynamic, involving many significant public health threats such as infectious diseases, chronic diseases, emergencies, injuries, and environmental health problems.2 A public health concern should be addressed by one consistent approach, similar to an all-hazards response in disaster management regardless of the type of event (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Kenya: Agricultural Sector
    Public Disclosure Authorized AGRICULTURE GLOBAL PRACTICE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PAPER Public Disclosure Authorized KENYA AGRICULTURAL SECTOR RISK ASSESSMENT Public Disclosure Authorized Stephen P. D’Alessandro, Jorge Caballero, John Lichte, and Simon Simpkin WORLD BANK GROUP REPORT NUMBER 97887 NOVEMBER 2015 Public Disclosure Authorized AGRICULTURE GLOBAL PRACTICE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PAPER KENYA Agricultural Sector Risk Assessment Stephen P. D’Alessandro, Jorge Caballero, John Lichte, and Simon Simpkin Kenya: Agricultural Sector Risk Assessment © 2015 World Bank Group 1818 H Street NW Washington, DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org E-mail: [email protected] All rights reserved This volume is a product of the staff of the World Bank Group. The fi ndings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper do not necessarily refl ect the views of the Executive Directors of the World Bank Group or the governments they represent. The World Bank Group does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of the World Bank Group concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. World Bank Group encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with complete information to the Copyright Clear- ance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA, telephone: 978-750-8400, fax: 978-750-4470, http://www.copyright .com/.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenya HIV Estimates Report, 2018 I
    KENYA HIV ESTIMATES REPORT 2018 NATIONAL AIDS CONTROL COUNCIL KENYA HIV ESTIMATES REPORT 2018 www.nacc.or.ke October 2018 Kenya HIV Estimates Report, 2018 i Table of Contents Foreword .....................................................................................................................................................................1 Preface .........................................................................................................................................................................2 Acknowledgement .....................................................................................................................................................3 Executive Summary .....................................................................................................................................................4 Adult HIV Prevalence ............................................................................................................................................4 HIV prevalence among males and females aged 15 to 24 years..........................................................................5 Annual New HIV Infections ...................................................................................................................................5 Trends in HIV Incidence and New HIV Infections .................................................................................................5 Treatment Needs ..................................................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Public Health Emergency Preparedness and Response Capabilities
    Public Health Emergency Preparedness and Response Capabilities National Standards for State, Local, Tribal, and Territorial Public Health Centers for Disease October 2018 Control and Prevention Center for Preparedness Updated January 2019 and Response Table of Contents Introduction . 1. Public Health Emergency Preparedness Cooperative Agreement Program..........................2 Capability Update Initiative ....................................................................3 Using the Capability Standards for Strategic Planning . .7 Public Health Emergency Preparedness and Response Capabilities Planning Model .................7 Phase 1: Assess Current State ...................................................................8 Phase 2: Determine Strategies and Activities.....................................................9 Phase 3: Develop Plans........................................................................10 At-A-Glance: Capability Definitions, Functions, and Summary of Changes . .11 Capability 1: Community Preparedness.........................................................11 Capability 2: Community Recovery.............................................................12 Capability 3: Emergency Operations Coordination ..............................................12 Capability 4: Emergency Public Information and Warning ........................................13 Capability 5: Fatality Management ............................................................13 Capability 6: Information Sharing ..............................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Quality Assessment of an Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System in a Province of Nepal
    Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease Article Quality Assessment of an Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System in a Province of Nepal Jyoti Acharya 1,* , Maria Zolfo 2 , Wendemagegn Enbiale 3,4, Khine Wut Yee Kyaw 5 , Meika Bhattachan 6, Nisha Rijal 1, Anjana Shrestha 1, Basudha Shrestha 7, Surendra Kumar Madhup 8, Bijendra Raj Raghubanshi 9 , Hari Prasad Kattel 10, Piyush Rajbhandari 11 , Parmananda Bhandari 12, Subhash Thakur 13, Saroj Sharma 14, Dipendra Raman Singh 15 and Runa Jha 1 1 National Public Health Laboratory, Kathmandu 44600, Nepal; [email protected] (N.R.); [email protected] (A.S.); [email protected] (R.J.) 2 Institute of Tropical Medicine, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium; [email protected] 3 Department of Dermatology and Venereology, BahirDar University, 1996 Bahir Dar, Ethiopia; [email protected] 4 Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Centre, Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity (AI&I), University of Amsterdam, 7057 Amsterdam, The Netherlands 5 International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Paris, France and International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Mandalay 11061, Myanmar; [email protected] 6 World Health Organization, Health Emergencies Unit, Kathmandu 44700, Nepal; [email protected] 7 Kathmandu Model Hospital, Kathmandu 44600, Nepal; [email protected] Citation: Acharya, J.; Zolfo, M.; 8 Dhulikhel Hospital, Dhulikhel 45200, Nepal; [email protected] Enbiale, W.; Kyaw, K.W.Y.; 9 KIST Medical College Teaching Hospital, Lalitpur 44700, Nepal; [email protected] Bhattachan, M.; Rijal, N.; Shrestha, A.; 10 Tribhuwan University Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu 44600, Nepal; [email protected] 11 Shrestha, B.; Madhup, S.K.; Patan Hospital, Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Lalitpur 44700, Nepal; [email protected] 12 Raghubanshi, B.R.; et al.
    [Show full text]