Explaining Evil, Legitimating Luck: Problems of Theodicy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Explaining Evil, Legitimating Luck: Problems of Theodicy Explaining Evil, Legitimating Luck: Problems of Theodicy Text and Ideas, Spring 2021 CORE-UA 400 080 Tuesday and Thursday 2:00-3:15 PM Professor Andrea Gadberry (she/her) Office Hours: by appointment on Wednesdays, 10:30-12:30 Appointment link: http://goo.gl/W2Fhpm Email: [email protected] Course Description In 1755, a massive earthquake came close to demolishing Lisbon, then the fourth largest city in Europe. The earthquake’s aftershocks, however, were also intellectual: in the face of catastrophe, woodcut, Bohemia (1755) writers struggled as they asked how God (or nature) could possibly be benevolent if so terrible an event could take place. The “justif[ication of] the ways of God to men” was also an ancient project, but it was not until the eighteenth century that the task of defending God, explaining disaster, or finding meaning in a world in which there is horrific suffering got a name: theodicy, a term coined only in 1710 by the philosopher Leibniz. This course investigates theodicy through a comparative literary framework. Looking at literary, philosophical, political-theoretical, and theological works, from antiquity to the present, we will examine theodicies and anti-theodicies alike that respond to “earthquakes” literal and figurative, singular and structural. As we read across a spectrum of texts – from “vindications” of the goodness of God to satires of the theodical project, from secular representations of the status quo that disavow their faith in providence to anti-theodicies that call for conspiracy and revolt – we will ask what and whom theodicy serves. How do these texts let us understand the production of meaning following disaster, how do they attempt to explain the existence of suffering or justify mere luck? How does justification take literary or philosophical form – and why does form matter to theodicy? What form(s) might an anti-theodicy take? How do these older works about theodicy speak to and from history, and why does theodicy matter today? The College Core Curriculum locates in all Texts and Ideas courses “a diverse group of humanities courses that study challenging, influential texts about big ideas….Texts and Ideas courses also seek to refine students’ ability to write and speak about complex concepts and arguments with clarity, originality, and eloquence. You will be challenged not only to master the content of some of the world’s most influential philosophical texts and works of literature, but to discuss how the ideas in these works have been debated, developed, appropriated, or rejected over time.” This course on theodicy will ask that you think about such “big ideas” as we take on a particularly large one, and throughout our course, we will pay close attention to the literary and philosophical stakes of the problem of theodicy (and its variants) as well as to the historical and political ends in which these big ideas appear. At the same time, through this course’s lectures and reading and through your written assignments, this class will ask you to pay close attention to smaller ideas as well as you develop your skills as close readers of texts and as writers of argumentative and interpretative essays. 2 Required Course Texts These works are available via the NYU Bookstore and are also widely available via online booksellers. (You may also find many of them in used bookstores in New York or elsewhere; please use the ISBN below and/or check the translations to make sure you are working with the required translation or edition.) Robert Alter, trans. and ed., The Wisdom Books: Job, Proverbs, and Ecclesiastes (New York: Norton, 2010), ISBN: 9780393340532 Bernard Mandeville, The Fable of the Bees and Other Writings (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1997), ISBN: 9780872203747 John Milton, Paradise Lost, ed. Alastair Fowler (Hoboken: Taylor and Francis, 2014), ISBN: 9781317865735 Sigrid Nunez, Salvation City (New York: Riverhead Books, 2011), ISBN: 9781594485374 Jean-Jacques Rousseau, The Discourses and Other Early Political Writings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018), ISBN: 9781316605547 Muriel Spark, The Only Problem (New York: Penguin, 1995), ISBN: 9780140179613 or in the volume of collected novels: The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie, The Girls of Slender Means, The Driver’s Seat, The Only Problem (Knopf 2004) ISBN: 9781400042067 Voltaire, Candide: Or Optimism, trans. Theo Cuffe (New York: Penguin, 2005), ISBN: 9780140455106 All other texts will be available in pdf format on the NYU Classes site under “Resources.” Recitation Sections Instructors: Andrew Ragni, Ph.D. (he/him) (§§ 083 and 084) NYU CORE Postdoctoral Teaching Fellow Email: [email protected] Office Hours: by appointment (via email) CORE-UA 400 083: F 2pm - 3:15pm CORE-UA 400 084: F 12:30pm - 1:45pm Ârash Aminian Tabrizi (he/him) (§§ 081 and 082) Ph.D. Candidate, Comparative Literature Email: [email protected] Office Hours: by appointment (via email) CORE-UA 400 081: F 8am - 9:15am CORE-UA 400 082: F 9:30am - 10:45am Course Requirements Participation and Attendance Your attendance at lectures and recitation sections is required. You are not permitted to record any lectures, and there is not a textbook for this class; your attendance and active notetaking, therefore, will be necessary for you to complete the course successfully. The course’s readings are central to the work of the class, and you should plan on devoting significant time to reading and even rereading the course materials. To prepare for lectures, please carefully read 3 the text(s) assigned for that day. Always come to class with the text at hand so you can follow the lectures. To prepare for your recitation section, you will need to have read the texts and thought about the lecture, and you should arrive at recitation likewise having thought of specific questions the text or lecture raises for you, particular moments in the text(s) that puzzle you, or observations the text inspires. In your recitations, you should be prepared to participate in conversation whether it be in small group activities (via break-out rooms) or larger class discussions. Attendance will be taken in your recitation sections and contribute to your participation grade. Your recitation instructors may also ask you to bring in brief written assignments or essays in progress for workshops. Assignments and Exams You will write three papers in this course, of increasing length, and take a midterm exam as well as a cumulative final exam. For each of your three papers, you will receive detailed assignment guidelines, and there will be opportunities in the lecture and in your recitation sections to discuss the assignment, its aims, and its expectations at length. There will also be required, informal written assignments, beginning with the letter of introduction and including small written assignments you do for your discussion sections. Grading Formula You must complete all assignments to pass the course. Attendance and Participation: 15% (includes informal assignments) Midterm Exam: 15% (short answer and 1 essay, 600-900 words) Final Exam: 25% (short answer, keyword/concept responses, and 2 essays, 600-900 words each) Papers (3): 45% (Papers 1-3 worth 10%, 15%, and 20% respectively at 900-1200 words, 1200-1500 words, and 1500-1800 words) Accessibility It is important to me that our course be inclusive by design and as accessible as possible. If you have already established accommodations with the Moses Center, please communicate your approved accommodations to me so we can discuss your needs for this course. If you are not currently registered with the Moses Center for Student Accessibility but think you could benefit from their support, see here: http://www.nyu.edu/students/communities-and-groups/students-with-disabilities.html or contact the Moses Center directly (212-998-4980 or [email protected]). Academic Integrity This course demands that you uphold the standards of academic integrity to which the university adhere. This means that absolutely no instances of academic dishonesty or plagiarism will be tolerated. It’s your responsibility to understand what plagiarism consists of, and you should know you will still be held to these standards of integrity even if you plagiarize accidentally. When in doubt, cite your sources, and ask your instructors! 4 Schedule of Sessions, Readings, and Major Assignments For each date below, please arrive having completed the readings listed to the right. Week 1 Th 28 January Course Overview and Introduction F 29 January Letter of Introduction: due by midnight EST Week 2 Tu 2 February Book of Job Th 4 February Book of Job, cont. Louise Glück, “Celestial Music” (pdf) Week 3 Tu 9 February Selections from Genesis (pdf) John Milton, Paradise Lost, Books 1-2 Th 11 February John Milton, Paradise Lost, Books 3-6 Selections from Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, Monadology (pdf) Week 4 Tu 16 February John Milton, Paradise Lost, Books 7-10 Aemilia Lanyer, “Eve’s Apology in Defense of Women” (pdf) Th 18 February No Class “Legislative Day” Classes meet on a Monday schedule. F 19 February Essay 1: due by midnight EST Week 5 Tu 23 February John Milton, Paradise Lost, Books 11-12 Excerpt from Alexander Pope, An Essay on Man (pdf) Th 25 February Gotffried Wilhelm Leibniz, “A Vindication of God’s Justice…” (pdf) Walter Benjamin, “The Lisbon Earthquake” (pdf) Voltaire, Poem on the Lisbon Disaster, pp. 97-108 (in your edition of Voltaire’s Candide) Week 6 Tu 2 March Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Letter to Voltaire, pp. 240-256 (in your edition of Rousseau’s Discourses, also available as pdf) John Wesley, “Serious Thoughts Occasioned by the Late Earthquake at Lisbon” (pdf) Th 4 March Voltaire, Candide, Chapters 1-13 Week 7 Tu 9 March Voltaire, Candide, Chapters 14-30 Th 11 March Ingmar Bergman, Winter Light (NYU Kanopy) Midterm exam: questions distributed during class Week 8 Sun 14 March Daylight Savings Time Tu 16 March Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Discourse on the Origin of Inequality, Part I Midterm exam: due by midnight EDT Th 18 March Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Discourse on the Origin of Inequality, Part II 5 F 19 March No recitation sections: “spring break” Week 9 Tu 23 March Bernard Mandeville, The Fable of the Bees, pp.
Recommended publications
  • BEFORE the ORIGINAL POSITION the Neo-Orthodox Theology of the Young John Rawls
    BEFORE THE ORIGINAL POSITION The Neo-Orthodox Theology of the Young John Rawls Eric Gregory ABSTRACT This paper examines a remarkable document that has escaped critical at- tention within the vast literature on John Rawls, religion, and liberalism: Rawls’s undergraduate thesis, “A Brief Inquiry into the Meaning of Sin and Faith: An Interpretation Based on the Concept of Community” (1942). The thesis shows the extent to which a once regnant version of Protestant the- ology has retreated into seminaries and divinity schools where it now also meets resistance. Ironically, the young Rawls rejected social contract liber- alism for reasons that anticipate many of the claims later made against him by secular and religious critics. The thesis and Rawls’s late unpublished remarks on religion and World War II offer a new dimension to his intellec- tual biography. They show the significance of his humanist response to the moral impossibility of political theology. Moreover, they also reveal a kind of Rawlsian piety marginalized by contemporary debates over religion and liberalism. KEY WORDS: John Rawls, community, liberalism, religion, political theology, public reason PROTESTANT THEOLOGIAN REINHOLD NIEBUHR DIED IN 1971. In that same year, philosopher John Rawls published his groundbreaking work, A The- ory of Justice. These two events symbolically express transformations in American intellectual and political culture that remain significant today. In the academy, religious defenders of a liberal consensus had been chal- lenged by ascendant secular liberalisms and emergent religious voices critical of liberalism of any kind. Parallel developments in the political culture had begun to see the fracturing of coalitions that transcended di- verse religious and secular commitments in order to support democratic institutions and practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Realism, Responsibility, and the Good Lawyer: Niebuhrian Perspectives on Legal Ethics
    Realism, Responsibility, and the Good Lawyer: Niebuhrian Perspectives on Legal Ethics Timothy l¥. Floyd * 1esus said to him, 'Why do you caU me good? No one is good but God aUr.n~'" ' - Luke 18:19. I. INTRODUCTION Is it morally permissible for a lawyer, when representing a client, to take actions that harm other persons or the common good? When criticized for such conduct, lawyers typically justify their actions by pointing to the professional rules that govern their conduct. Those rules rc:;quire lawyers to' represent clients zealously and diligently within the bounds of the law.l Most law­ yers believe this professional obligation requires them to help a client achieve any lawful objective, regardless of the effect on other persons or the public good. A lawyer who takes lawful ac­ tions to further a client's lawful interests need not fear profession­ al sanction for causing harm to others. Freedom from professional discipline, however, does not amount to moral justification. Over the past fifteen years. a re­ markable number of commentators, including several professional philosophers, have debated the morality of the lawyer's profession­ al duty of client loyalty. The debate is often phrased in terms of whether "a good lawyer can be a good person," a question posed by Charles Fried.2 Fried employed the metaphor of the "lawyer as friend." Arguing that persons are morally justified in preferring the interests of friends over other persons, Fried concluded that lawyers should be viewed as "special purpose friends.. " Accordingly, "it is not only legally but morally right that a lawyer adopt as his * Associate Professor of Law, Texas Tech Univc;rsio/.
    [Show full text]
  • Faith and Politics: an Augustinian Reflection Anfaith Augustinian and Politics: Reflection an Augustinian Reflection Robin Lovin Robin Lovin Robin Lovin
    AN OCCASIONAL PAPER AN OCCASIONAL PAPER VOLUME 29 VAON LUMEOCC A29SIONAL PAPER VOLUME 29 Faith and Politics: Faith and Politics: An Augustinian Reflection AnFaith Augustinian and Politics: Reflection An Augustinian Reflection Robin Lovin Robin Lovin Robin Lovin THE CARY M. MAGUIRE CENTER THE CARY M. MAGUIRE CENTER FOR ETHICS & PUBLIC RESPONSIBILITY THE CARY M. MAGUIRE CENTER FOR ETHICS & PUBLIC RESPONSIBILITY SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY FOR ETHICS & PUBLIC RESPONSIBILITY SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY DALLAS, TEXAS SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY DALLAS, TEXAS DALLAS, TEXAS VOLUME 1 “The Private and Public Intellectual in the World and the Academy” James K. Hopkins VOLUME 2 “Managed Care: Some Basic Ethical Issues” James F. Childress Part of the Maguire Ethics Center’s mission is to “provide moral reflection VOLUME 3 “Journalism as a High Profession in Spite of Itself” William Lee Miller on contemporary issues.” Certainly, one of the more visible ways we do that VOLUME 4 “The New Media: The Internet, Democracy, Free Speech and the Richard O. Mason is by providing a venue for customary scholarly discourse for select SMU Management of Temperance” professors, and occasionally, visiting scholars. VOLUME 5 “Look, her lips’: Softness of Voice, Construction of Character in King Lear” Michael Holahan In ancient Athens, elders would provide an oral narration intended to pass VOLUME 6 “Pilgrimage and the Desire for Meaning” Bonnie Wheeler along the values, customs and beliefs from one generation to the next one. By the Renaissance, the practice transformed into written form through public VOLUME 7 “Politics as a Calling” Joseph L. Allen essays designed to be widely shared among community members.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rape of the Lock: and an Essay On
    ECLECTIC EN G LISH CLASSICS TH E RA PE OF TH E LOCK A N D AN ES S AY ON MAN BY ALE XAN DE R EOP E TE D BY A . M . VAN E DI DY K E , M . A . DE PARTME N T OF E N G LIS H , CINCI NNATI H IG H SCH OOL N E W YORK CIN CIN N A TI CH ICA G O A M E R I C A N B O O K C O M P A N Y 1 898 w 1 m “H iram i m ” . atis m LIbr ar y BOWL of EGUC TRANS FE HML D I O RAIN MID COL LEG E H a m! 1 192 1 J U . ‘ Co r i h t 1 8 8 b py g , 9 , y A M E R I AN Boox O A C C M P N Y . I N T R O D U CT I O N . A D E R OP E wa s n n A L E X N P bor in Lombard Street , Lo don , May fa h er wa wh o 2 1 1 68 8 . t s , His a linen draper had amassed a considerable fortune , and his mother, Edith , was one of the sev i n n enteen ch ldren of William Turner, a Roman Catholic ge tlema , ’ th e e e e lord of a manor in Yorks hire . Both of po t s par nts wer Roman Catholics . On account of his extremely delicate health , he was, at the age th e n of eight , put under tuitio of the family priest, who taught him the rudiments of Latin and Greek .
    [Show full text]
  • Political Theology After Reinhold Niebuhr and Emmanuel Levinas
    religions Article When Liberalism Is Not Enough: Political Theology after Reinhold Niebuhr and Emmanuel Levinas J. Aaron Simmons 1,* and Kevin Carnahan 2 1 Department of Philosophy, Furman University, Greenville, SC 29613, USA 2 Department of Philosophy and Religion, Central Methodist University, Fayette, MO 65248, USA * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 10 June 2019; Accepted: 12 July 2019; Published: 18 July 2019 Abstract: In this paper, we are interested in extending out the dialectical models of religious ethics and political theology that Reinhold Niebuhr and Emmanuel Levinas began by enacting a conversation between these two theorists. We do this by presenting and critically comparing Niebuhr’s and Levinas’s thought as concerns three key issues in moral and political theory: (1) the nature of persons, (2) the source and content of the moral ideal of love and the political ideal of justice, and (3) the impossibility and yet continued practical relevance of ideals for social life. Ultimately, we conclude that they mutually offer reasons to find hope in the face of political cynicism. Keywords: political theology; Emmanuel Levinas; Reinhold Niebuhr; postmodern ethics; liberalism; justice; love In 2007, Simon Critchley suggested that “we are living through a chronic re-theologization of politics” (Critchely 2007, p. 5). This “re-theologization” is occurring, he contends, because people are trying desperately to find some sort of meaning in a world threatened by “nihilism.” “In a word”, he provocatively states, “the institutions of secular liberal democracy simply do not sufficiently motivate their citizenry” (Critchely 2007, p. 7). He continues on to propose that “this motivational deficit is also a moral deficit, a lack at the heart of democratic life that is intimately bound up with the felt inadequacy of official secular conceptions of morality” (Critchely 2007, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Staying Optimistic: the Trials and Tribulations of Leibnizian Optimism
    Strickland, Lloyd 2019 Staying Optimistic: The Trials and Tribulations of Leibnizian Optimism. Journal of Modern Philosophy, 1(1): 3, pp. 1–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32881/jomp.3 RESEARCH Staying Optimistic: The Trials and Tribulations of Leibnizian Optimism Lloyd Strickland Manchester Metropolitan University, GB [email protected] The oft-told story of Leibniz’s doctrine of the best world, or optimism, is that it enjoyed a great deal of popularity in the eighteenth century until the massive earthquake that struck Lisbon on 1 November 1755 destroyed its support. Despite its long history, this story is nothing more than a commentators’ fiction that has become accepted wisdom not through sheer weight of evidence but through sheer frequency of repetition. In this paper we shall examine the reception of Leibniz’s doctrine of the best world in the eighteenth century in order to get a clearer understanding of what its fate really was. As we shall see, while Leibniz’s doctrine did win a good number of adherents in the 1720s and 1730s, especially in Germany, support for it had largely dried up by the mid-1740s; moreover, while opponents of Leibniz’s doctrine were few and far between in the 1710s and 1720s, they became increasing vocal in the 1730s and afterwards, between them producing an array of objections that served to make Leibnizian optimism both philosophically and theologically toxic years before the Lisbon earthquake struck. Keywords: Leibniz; Optimism; Best world; Lisbon earthquake; Evil; Wolff The oft-told story of Leibniz’s doctrine of the best world, or optimism, is that it enjoyed a great deal of popularity in the eighteenth century until the massive earthquake that struck Lisbon on 1 November 1755 destroyed its support.
    [Show full text]
  • The Self and the Dramas of History by Reinhold Niebuhr
    The Self and the Dramas of History return to religion-online The Self and the Dramas of History by Reinhold Niebuhr One of the foremost philsophers and theologians of the twentieth century, Reinhold Niebuhr was for many years a Professor at Union Theological Seminary, New York City. He is the author of many classics in their field, including The Nature and Destiny of Man, Moral Man and Immoral Society, The Children of Light and the Children of Darkness, and Discerning the Signs of Our Times. He was also the founding editor of the publication Christianity and Crisis. The Self and the Dramas of History, was published in 1955 by Charles Scribner’s Sons. This material prepared for Religion Online by Harry and Grace Adams. In this volume Professor Niebuhr explores the philosophical and theological relationship of the human self to itself, others and God, with particular reference to both Hellenic and Hebraic frames of reference in Western thought, and as seen in the evolution of communities. Part I: The Dialogues of the Self with Itself, with Others, and with God Chapter 1: The Uniqueness of the Human Self : Greek philosophy defined the uniquely human in terms of man’s rational faculty, whereas Hebraism’s metaphor of man’s being created in God’s image can be understood as the self’s capacity to dialogue with itself, with others and with God. Chapter 2: The Internal Dialogue of the Self The dialogue which the self carries on within itself is certainly more complex than understood in classical philosophy. Depth psychology has uncovered many of these complexities.
    [Show full text]
  • Poet's Corner in Westminster Abbey
    Poet’s Corner in Westminster Abbey Alton Barbour Abstract: Beginning with a brief account of the history of Westminster Abbey and its physical structure, this paper concentrates on the British writers honored in the South Transept or Poet’s Corner section. It identifies those recognized who are no longer thought to be outstanding, those now understood to be outstanding who are not recognized, and provides an alphabetical listing of the honored members of dead poet’s society, Britain’s honored writers, along with the works for which they are best known. Key terms: Poet’s Corner, Westminster Abbey, South Transept. CHRISTIANITY RETURNS AND CHURCHES ARE BUILT A walk through Westminster Abbey is a walk through time and through English history from the time of the Norman conquest. Most of that journey is concerned with the crowned heads of England, but not all. One section of the Abbey has been dedicated to the major figures in British literature. This paper is concerned mainly with the major poets, novelists and dramatists of Britain, but that concentration still requires a little historical background. For over nine centuries, English monarchs have been both crowned and buried in Westminster Abbey. The Angles, Saxons and Jutes who conquered and occupied England in the mid 5th century were pagans. But, as the story goes, Pope Gregory saw two fair-haired boys in the Roman market who were being sold as slaves and asked who they were. He was told that they were Angles. He replied that they looked more like angels (angeli more than angli) and determined that these pagan people should be converted to Christianity.
    [Show full text]
  • Should I Help the Empire with My Hand? Confucian Resources for a Paradigm of Just Peacemaking Confucianism Is Not Generally Considered to Be a Pacifist Tradition
    Should I Help the Empire with My Hand? Confucian Resources for a Paradigm of Just Peacemaking Confucianism is not generally considered to be a pacifist tradition. However canonical texts like the Mencius offer important elements that could undergird a paradigm of just peacemaking: a prophetic critique of the status quo on grounds of social welfare, an emphasis on relationality, a strategic position advocating the extension of empathy, and a faith in the goodness of human nature and thus the perfectibility of human persons. Among other things, these points represent significant motivators for social justice, conflict transformation, and restorative justice. Perhaps most importantly, however, the this-worldly orientation of the Confucian tradition, as found in the Mencian example, offers a theoretical model with potential for dissolving the traditional paradigm’s dichotomy found in such oppositions as ideal and real, faithfulness/effectiveness, and clean hands/dirty hands that have historically made debates between pacifism and Just War so intractable. David Kratz Mathies David Kratz Mathies (PhD, Boston University) is Assistant Professor of Philosophy and Religion at Missouri Western State University. “Just Peacemaking” is the name given to a new paradigm advocated by Glen Stassen and an impressive collection of fellow scholars. [1] These thirty authors, themselves a mix of pacifists and just war theorists, have done an admirable job of grounding their peacebuilding model in both empirical evidence of concrete practices [2] and Christian
    [Show full text]
  • ENGL 3502E BRITISH LITERATURE II British Literature from 1700 to WW I
    Carleton University 2010-2011 Department of English ENGL 3502E BRITISH LITERATURE II British Literature from 1700 to WW I Prerequisite: ENGL 2300 Class times: Mondays & Wednesdays 2:35 pm – 3:55 pm Location: Please confirm fall and winter term locations on Carleton Central Instructor: Dr. J.H.C. Reid Office Hours: Mondays, 1:00 – 2:00 Office: 1915 Dunton Tower Phone: 520-2600 ext. 2318 email: [email protected] Do feel free to phone at any time as there is voice mail in the office. Course description This course introduces students to texts by British authors from 1700 to WW I, and is designed to communicate a sense of the chronological development of English literature in Britain as well as of the dynamic cultural contexts this literature engages. In order better to appreciate the cultural importance of the texts we study, we will strive to situate them in relation to their literary and historical backgrounds and to appreciate the ways in which these texts shaped, were shaped by, and commented on, the issues of their day. In addition to engaging with extended pieces of poetry and prose by writers such as Pope, Swift, Fielding, Defoe, Dickens, Austen, Wordsworth, Coleridge, and Tennyson, iter alia, we will study shorter works by a variety of authors in order to show how literary genres are constructed by communities of men and women writing with shared and competing interests and motives. One of the focal questions underlying our reading will be: How does an historical understanding of British culture enhance and enrich our reading of English literature from different historical periods? We will also consider the portraits of heroism, gender, love, lust, violence, religion, art, authorship, and Englishness presented in these texts, and study the ways in which different writers handled such topics.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis/Dissertation Prospectus College of Humanities and Social Sciences
    THESIS/DISSERTATION PROSPECTUS COLLEGE OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES Candidate: Theresa Neman SSN/Student ID: 0111-111 Department: ENGLISH Degree: MA Proposed Topic: Warburton’s Pope: A Matter of Editorship Please attach a copy of the Thesis/Dissertation Prospectus as required by your department. Please see department instructions for preparation of your prospectus. Thesis/Dissertation Committee Approval: Printed Name Signature Dr. Paul Child, Thesis Director Dr. Robert Adams Dr. Audrey Murfin Administrative Approval: Director, Graduate Studies in English Date Chair, Department of English Date Dean, College of Humanities and Social Sciences Date Thesis Prospectus: Warburton’s Pope: A Matter of Editorship Theresa Neman The Critical Problem: In the later years of his life, declining in health, his closest friends dead or distanced, Alexander Pope chose William Warburton to act as executor of his estate and editor of his works. This appointment of Warburton has generally been seen as a reward for his public defense of Pope against attacks upon The Essay on Man. In 1751, seven years after Pope’s death, Warburton produced an edition of the Collected Works laden, in Scriblerian fashion, with elaborate footnotes, extensive commentary, essays-in-brief tracing sources and allusions, and translations of Pope’s Latin and Greek transcriptions. He also included critical arguments about what he thought to be Pope’s intentions in various poems. Not long after the appearance of Warburton’s edition, readers questioned both the wisdom and the motives of his editing. Samuel Johnson suggested that Warburton could never restrain himself from “saying something when there is nothing to be said” (Evans 174).
    [Show full text]
  • Justice According to Reinhold Niebuhr and Gustavo Gutiérrez
    University of Tennessee at Chattanooga UTC Scholar Student Research, Creative Works, and Honors Theses Publications 5-2019 Justice according to Reinhold Niebuhr and Gustavo Gutiérrez Rebecca L. Miller University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.utc.edu/honors-theses Part of the Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Miller, Rebecca L., "Justice according to Reinhold Niebuhr and Gustavo Gutiérrez" (2019). Honors Theses. This Theses is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research, Creative Works, and Publications at UTC Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of UTC Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Justice According to Reinhold Niebuhr and Gustavo Gutiérrez Rebecca Lynn Miller Departmental Honors Thesis The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Philosophy and Religion Department Examination Date: 1st of April 2019 Dr. Jonathan Yeager Dr. Talia Welsh UC Foundation Associate UC Foundation Professor of Professor of Religion Philosophy Thesis Director Department Examiner Dr. Barry Matlock Lecturer of Religion Department Examiner Miller 2 Abstract Reinhold Niebuhr and Gustavo Gutiérrez were two influential theologians. Niebuhr was a Protestant neo-orthodox theologian and Gutiérrez was a Catholic liberation theologian. Both tackled the theological topics of justice and reformation. Niebuhr and Gutiérrez came to similar conclusions on these topics although they shared no explicit connections. Despite this, these two thinkers are not widely compared in scholarship. There is an academic tradition of treating Catholicism and Protestantism separately. This tradition could explain why the similarities between the two are overlooked.
    [Show full text]