DOCSLIB.ORG

Tackling Violence Against Women and Domestic Violence in Europe

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tackling Violence Against Women and Domestic Violence in Europe STUDY Requested by the FEMM committee Tackling violence against women and domestic violence in Europe The added value of the Istanbul Convention and remaining challenges Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs Directorate-General for Internal Policies PE 658.648 - October 2020 EN Tackling violence against women and domestic violence in Europe The added value of the Istanbul Convention and remaining challenges Abstract This study was commissioned by the European Parliament’s Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs at the request of the FEMM Committee. It aims to understand the implementation of the Convention, its added value, arguments against the ratification of the Convention, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on violence against women (VAW) and domestic violence (DV). The 27 EU Member States are included in the study, together with Turkey, which offers a comparator of the impact of the ratification of the Convention by a non-EU country. This document was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality (FEMM). AUTHORS Nathalie MEURENS, ICF Hayley D’SOUZA, ICF Saredo MOHAMED, ICF Els LEYE, Ghent University/Consultant Nazia CHOWDHURY, ICF Stelios CHARITAKIS, ICF Kate, REGAN, ICF SENIOR EXPERT The authors are grateful for the feedback of the senior expert: Prof Dr Els LEYE, Ghent University/consultant COUNTRY EXPERTS Austria: Inga PAVLOVAITE Belgium: Nathalie MEURENS Bulgaria: Madlen NIKOLOVA Croatia: Jelena MILOVANOVIC Cyprus: Stelios CHARITAKIS Czechia: Klara KOVAROVA Denmark: Dora VAJAI Estonia: Anu LAAS Finland: Nazia CHOWDHURY France: Magali GAY-BERTHOMIEU Germany: Inga PAVLOVAITE Greece: Stelios CHARITAKIS Hungary: Dora VAJAI Ireland: Saredo MOHAMED Italy: Hayley D’SOUZA Latvia: Kristīne DUPATE Lithuania: Inga PAVLOVAITE Luxembourg: Nathalie MEURENS Malta: Saredo MOHAMED Netherlands: Eline WILDOER and Hayley D’SOUZA Poland: Karolina JAKUBOWSKA Portugal: Rachel MARSHALL Romania: Irina ULCICA Slovakia: Klara KOVAROVA Slovenia: Hayley D’SOUZA Spain: Claudia ABDALLAH Sweden: Nazia CHOWDHURY Turkey: Gizem GUNEY ADMINISTRATOR RESPONSIBLE Martina SCHONARD EDITORIAL ASSISTANT Sandrina MARCUZZO LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN ABOUT THE EDITOR Policy departments provide in-house and external expertise to support EP committees and other parliamentary bodies in shaping legislation and exercising democratic scrutiny over EU internal policies. To contact the Policy Department or to subscribe for updates, please write to: Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs European Parliament B-1047 Brussels Email: [email protected] Manuscript completed in October 2020 © European Union, 2020 This document is available on the internet at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/supporting-analyses DISCLAIMER AND COPYRIGHT The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the European Parliament is given prior notice and sent a copy. Tackling violence against women and domestic violence in Europe CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 6 LIST OF BOXES 9 LIST OF FIGURES 10 LIST OF TABLES 11 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 12 INTRODUCTION 17 1.1. Aims of the study 17 1.2. Methods used to gather evidence for this study 17 1.2.1. Literature review 18 1.2.2. Legal and policy mapping 18 1.2.3. National data collection 19 1.2.4. Stakeholder consultation (online survey) 19 TACKLING VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN ACROSS EUROPE THROUGH POLICY, LEGISLATION AND THE ISTANBUL CONVENTION 20 2.1. Why are laws and policies tackling violence against women and domestic violence needed across the EU? 21 2.1.1. The scale of the problem: violence against women and domestic violence in numbers 21 2.1.2. An EU-wide issue exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic 23 2.2. The EU response to violence against women 24 2.2.1. Existing EU legislation and policies tackling violence against women and domestic violence 24 2.2.2. Tackling violence against women and domestic violence through programmes and initiatives 25 2.3. What is the Istanbul Convention? 26 2.3.1. The Convention’s adoption 26 2.3.2. Overview of the key obligations under the Istanbul Convention 27 2.3.3. EU Member States and Turkey’s ratification of the Istanbul Convention 29 2.3.4. The Istanbul Convention and the EU 31 THE ADDED VALUE OF THE ISTANBUL CONVENTION 33 3.1. Implementation of the Istanbul Convention across the EU and Turkey 34 3.1.1. Legislative developments following the ratification 34 3.1.2. New forms of violence adopted as criminal offences under national laws 40 3.1.3. Case-law developments 72 3.1.4. Policy responses to the ratification of the Istanbul Convention 76 PE 658.648 3 IPOL | Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs 3.1.5. Protection of women victims of violence and their children 79 3.1.6. Impact of the Convention, good practices and remaining challenges identified across the EU-27 and Turkey 90 3.2. How does the Istanbul Convention bring added value? 100 3.2.1. Innovations from the Convention 100 3.2.2. A stronger international law framework tackling violence against women 102 3.2.3. The GREVIO process and closer monitoring 103 THE REASONS FOR AND IMPACT OF NOT RATIFYING THE ISTANBUL CONVENTION 107 4.1. Understanding some of the national resistance to ratifying 108 4.1.1. Overview of signature and the failed ratification processes 108 4.1.2. Understanding the arguments against the ratification 110 4.1.3. Arguments and actors resisting the Convention country-by-country 113 4.1.4. Understanding the risk of withdrawing from the Istanbul Convention 122 4.1.5. Resistance in other Member States which have ratified 124 4.2. Gender identity and the Istanbul Convention: what is the implication of ratifying the Convention? 127 4.2.1. What does the Convention actually require in relation to gender? 127 4.2.2. What does international law require in relation to the ground of gender? 130 4.2.3. What does the EU law say about the ground of gender? 130 THE IMPACT OF AND RESPONSE TO COVID-19 ON VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN 132 5.1. Impact of COVID-19 on violence against women 133 5.1.2. Data on Violence Against Women since outbreak of COVID-19 133 5.1.3. Thematic analysis of impact of COVID-19 on VAW 147 5.2. National responses to Violence Against Women in relation to COVID-19 155 5.2.1. Coordinated actions and strategies 157 5.2.2. Legal system 158 5.2.3. Strengthening support services 159 5.2.4. Awareness-raising campaigns 161 5.2.5. Summary of response to violence against women due to COVID-19 by country 162 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 178 6.1. Conclusions 178 6.1.1. The added value of the Istanbul Convention 178 6.1.2. The reasons for and impact of not ratifying the Istanbul Convention 180 6.1.3. The impact of and response to COVID-19 on violence against women 182 6.2. Recommendations 182 6.2.1. Recommendation 1: Strengthen the legal framework by fully reflecting the Convention’s substantial law provisions in the legislation 183 4 PE 658.64 Tackling violence against women and domestic violence in Europe 6.2.2. Recommendation 2: Ensure the full implementation of the Istanbul Convention’s provisions 184 6.2.3. Recommendation 3: Ensure an integrated, gender-sensitive, intersectional and evidence-based policy framework 185 6.2.4. Recommendation 4: Ensure adequate prevention, protection and service provision 186 6.2.5. Recommendation 5: Promote gender equality, education and awareness-raising on the various forms of violence and gender stereotypes 186 REFERENCES 188 PE 658.648 5 IPOL | Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ANES Romania National Agency for Equal Opportunities between Women and Men CAHVIO Committee for preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence CEDAW Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women CJEU Court of Justice of the European Union CoE Council of Europe DV Domestic Violence ECHR European Charter on Human Rights ECtHR European Court of Human Rights EIGE European Institute for Gender Equality EU European Union EU-27 27 Members States which make up the European Union from 1st February 2020 FEMM European Parliament Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality FGM Female genital mutilation FAQ Frequently asked questions FRA Fundamental Rights Agency GREVIO Group of Experts on Action against Violence against Women and Domestic Violence IVF In vitro fertilisation IPV Intimate Partner Violence Istanbul Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against Convention women and domestic violence MEGA Luxembourg Ministry of Equal Opportunity MEP Member of European Parliament 6 PE 658.64 Tackling violence against women and domestic violence in Europe MP Member of Parliament NAP National action plan NAPE Finland Committee for Combating VAW and DV NGOs Non-Governmental Organisations PPE Personal protective equipment RCC Rape crisis centre StGB Strafgesetzbuch (German Criminal Code) TFEU Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union TEU Treaty on the European Union UN United Nations UNDP United Nations Devlopment Programme UNODC United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime VAW Violence Against Women ZPND Slovenia Domestic Violence Prevention Act COUNTRY ABBREVIATIONS AT Austria BE Belgium BG Bulgaria CY Cyprus CZ Czechia DE
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lost in Transition 25 Years of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development
    Lost in transition 25 years of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development April 2016 » p.20 » p.13 » p.25 » p.25 » p.30 » p.34 This report has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. The content of this report is the sole responsibility of CEE Bankwatch Network and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union. 3 Contents 04 Executive Summary 06 Introduction: Transition – still? 12 EBRD operations – bringing positive change? 13 Resource dependence and democracy 13 The EBRD in Azerbaijan 18 The EBRD in the MENA region: how is public participation and oversight ensured without basic freedoms in Egypt? 20 Mongolia’s debt trap 25 Lack of leverage and lesson-learning in environmentally risky projects 25 Prolonging the pain in Ukraine’s nuclear sector 30 Who is to benefit from the Georgian hydropower development rush? 34 EBRD support for intensive chicken farming - Myronivsky Hliboproduct (MHP), Ukraine 38 Where are the results and accountability? 44 Conclusions Research and writing Aleksandra Antonowicz-Cyglicka, Polish Green Network Fidanka Bacheva-McGrath, CEE Bankwatch Network Pippa Gallop, CEE Bankwatch Network Ana-Maria Seman, Bankwatch Romania Klara Sikorova, CEE Bankwatch Network Acknowledgements Filip Bartkowiak Dato Chipashvili, CEE Bankwatch Network/Green Alternative, Georgia Sukhgerel Dugersuren, OT Watch, Mongolia’s Iryna Holovko, CEE Bankwatch Network/ National Ecological Centre of Ukraine Natalia Kolomiets, National Ecological Centre of Ukraine Vladlena Martsynkevych, CEE Bankwatch Network/National Ecological Centre of Ukraine Editing David Hoffman, CEE Bankwatch Network Design Michal Amrich Lost in transition: 25 years of the EBRD 4 Executive Summary On 15 April 2016 the European Bank for Reconstruction and Pushing privatisation and liberalisation in countries with weak Development (EBRD) will mark its 25th anniversary.
    [Show full text]
  • The World's Women 2010 Trends and Statistics
    ST/ESA/STAT/SER.K/19 Department of Economic and Social Affairs The World's Women 2010 Trends and Statistics asdf United Nations New York, 2010 Department of Economic and Social Affairs The Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat is a vital interface between global policies in the economic, social and environmental spheres and national action. The Department works in three main interlinked areas: (i) it compiles, generates and analyses a wide range of economic, social and environmental data and information on which States Members of the United Nations draw to review common problems and take stock of policy options; (ii) it facilitates the negotiations of Member States in many intergovernmental bodies on joint courses of action to address ongoing or emerging global challenges; and (iii) it advises interested Governments on the ways and means of translating policy frameworks developed in United Nations conferences and summits into programmes at the country level and, through technical assistance, helps build national capacities. Note The designations employed and the presentation of material in the present report do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The term “country” as used in the text of this report also refers, as appropriate, to territories or areas. The designations “developed” and “developing” countries or areas and “more developed” and “less developed” regions are intended for statistical convenience and do not necessarily express a judgement about the stage reached by a particular country or area in the development process.
    [Show full text]
  • Empowering Women in Turkey: a Priority in the Pre-Accession Process
    EMPOWERING WOMEN IN TURKEY: A PRIORITY IN THE PRE-ACCESSION PROCESS Empowering women must be a priority in the pre-accession process and all stakeholders must be mobilized to ensure effective progress and implementation on the ground of the new rights. This means strengthening the administrative capacity of relevant bodies and appropriate structures to monitor women’s situation. Member States have a lot to share with Turkey and exchanges of best practices in different fields will enable the various actors to face the challenges brought by the need to adapt the welfare system. Vladimír Špidlax x Mr Vladimír Špidla is member of the European Commission in charge of Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities since November 2004. Prior to his functions at EU level, he was Prime Minister of the Czech Republic. he European Union is not only a gathering of States, it is above all a Union of people where both women and men enjoy rights, have an active role to play and benefit from policies. In this context, gender equality is an essential value of the T European Union and a core element of the European Social Model. Indeed, empowering women in social, economic and political fields relates to questions of effective democracy, equality of rights for all citizens and the sustainable development of pluralist societies. Equality between women and men is enshrined in the European Treaties and is the objective of various legal texts that must be fully applied in the Member States. In addition, the European Union has adopted a positive approach to mainstream gender in all policies and to fight against discrimination on the ground of sex.
    [Show full text]
  • Research and Prevention of Femicide Across Europe
    EDITED BY SHALVA WEIL, CONSUELO CORRADI AND MARCELINE NAUDI FEMICIDE ACROSS EUROPE Theory, research and prevention POLICY PRESSPOLICY & PRACT ICE EDITED BY: SHALVA WEIL CONSUELO CORRADI MARCELINE NAUDI FEMICIDE ACROSS EUROPE Theory, research and prevention POLICY PRESSPOLICY & PRACT ICE First published in Great Britain in 2018 by Policy Press North America office: University of Bristol Policy Press 1-9 Old Park Hill c/o The University of Chicago Press Bristol 1427 East 60th Street BS2 8BB Chicago, IL 60637, USA UK t: +1 773 702 7700 t: +44 (0)117 954 5940 f: +1 773 702 9756 [email protected] [email protected] www.policypress.co.uk www.press.uchicago.edu © Policy Press 2018 The digital PDF version of this title is available Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 license (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits adaptation, alteration, reproduction and distribution for non-commercial use, without further permission provided the original work is attributed. The derivative works do not need to be licensed on the same terms. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A catalog record for this book has been requested. ISBN 978-1-4473-4713-2 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-4473-4714-9 (ePub) ISBN 978-1-4473-4715-6 (Mobi) ISBN 978-1-4473-4716-3 (OA PDF) The right of Shalva Weil, Consuelo Corradi and Marceline Naudi to be identified as editors of this work has been asserted by them in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
    [Show full text]
  • Making the Connection
    MAKING THE CONNECTION Intimate partner violence and violence against children in Eastern Europe and Central Asia EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Cover photo © UNICEF/UN040850/Bicanski EXECUTIVE SUMMARY MAKING THE CONNECTION Intimate partner violence and violence against children in Eastern Europe and Central Asia 2018 Acronyms ACE Adverse Childhood Experiences Survey DHS Demographic and Health Survey IPV Intimate partner violence MICS Multiple Indicators Cluster Survey UNECE United Nations Economic Commission for Europe UNICEF United Nations Children Fund UNFPA United Nations Population Fund UN Women United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women VAC Violence against children VAW/G Violence against women and girls WHO World Health Organization Acknowledgments The Study on Violence against Women and Violence against Children is a collaboration between the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) regional offices in Europe and Central Asia. This report is a summary of a larger study, which has benefited from the data and analysis contributed by UNFPA and UNICEF regional office and country office staff. UNFPA and UNICEF are also grateful to the lead researcher, Emma Fulu, Director of the Equality Institute, and to the colleagues who provided peer review to the Study: Alina Potts of the UNICEF Office of Research, Innocenti; Yolanda Iriarte of UN Women; and Isabel Yordi Aguirre and Stine Kure of the World Health Organization (WHO). Project management and report team: UNFPA EASTERN EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA REGIONAL OFFICE: Nigina Abaszade, Regional Gender Advisor Nurgul Kinderbaeva, Gender Specialist Marta Diavolova, Regional Adviser, Strategic Partnerships UNICEF EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA REGIONAL OFFICE: Maha Muna, Regional Gender Advisor Guzal Kamalova, Child Protection Specialist Siraj Mahmudlu, Data Specialist Nurve Eren, Office Assistant Contents Foreword ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Analysis of the Headscarf in France, Turkey, and the United States Hera Hashmi
    University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender and Class Volume 10 | Issue 2 Article 8 Too Much to Bare? A Comparative Analysis of the Headscarf in France, Turkey, and the United States Hera Hashmi Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/rrgc Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, and the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Hera Hashmi, Too Much to Bare? A Comparative Analysis of the Headscarf in France, Turkey, and the United States, 10 U. Md. L.J. Race Relig. Gender & Class 409 (2010). Available at: http://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/rrgc/vol10/iss2/8 This Notes & Comments is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UM Carey Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender and Class by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UM Carey Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TOO MUCH TO BARE? A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE HEADSCARF IN FRANCE, TURKEY, AND THE UNITED STATES BY HERA HASHMI* INTRODUCTION In July 2009, a man stabbed and killed a pregnant woman wearing a headscarf in a German courtroom during an appellate trial for his Islamophobic remarks against her.1 Her death led to outrage around the world, and she became known as the "martyr of the veil," a woman killed for her religious belief.2 Yet it was just a simple piece of cloth that evoked this violent reaction. Such Islamaphobic sentiments seem to be spreading throughout various parts of the world. In 2004, France banned headscarves and all conspicuous religious symbols from public classrooms.3 In 2005, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR)4 upheld Turkey's headscarf ban barring thousands of headscarf-wearing women from attending schools, universities, and entering government buildings in a country where a majority of the population is Muslim.
    [Show full text]
  • Coordinating for Gender Equality Results
    COORDINATING FOR GENDER EQUALITY RESULTS RESULTS GENDER EQUALITY FOR COORDINATING COORDINATING FOR GENDER EQUALITY RESULTS Regional evaluation of UN Women’s contribution to UN system coordination on gender equality and the empowerment of women in Europe and Central Asia ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The evaluation team wishes to thank the many individuals UN Women ECA RO Regional Director, Alia El-Yassir, and organizations who supported the evaluation process UN Women ECA RO Deputy Director and Fumie Nakamura, by making themselves available for interviews and surveys UN Women ECA RO Coordination and Planning Specialist. and by providing helpful feedback on draft deliverables. Special thanks to the UN Women Europe and Central We thank the country representatives and staff of the Asia Regional Office (ECA RO) and to UN Women country four offices visited for all the dedicated time they invested offices, government and non-government partners in the in supporting the evaluation process and in facilitating four case study countries (Albania, Kyrgyzstan, Kosovo, the engagement and inclusion of a wide range of part- and Turkey) and the three countries interviewed virtually ners, stakeholders and beneficiaries of their work, in (Bosnia-Herzegovina, Georgia, and Serbia) for this evalua- particular Albania Country Office (David Saunders, tion. Their cooperation was essential in understanding the Country Office Representative), Kyrgyzstan Country Office nature of UN Women’s coordination mandate at regional (Gerald Gunther, Country Office Representative), Kosovo and national levels. We are also grateful to all 14 ECA Programme Office (Flora Macula, Head of Programme countries whose documentation was provided for review. Office), Turkey Programme Office (Zeliha Unaldi, Gender Finally, we could not have done this without the support Specialist Office of the UN Resident) Coordinator).
    [Show full text]
  • Criminalization and Prosecution of Rape in Denmark
    AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL INTERNATIONAL SECRETARIAT www.amnesty.org CRIMINALIZATION AND PROSECUTION OF RAPE IN DENMARK SUBMISSION TO THE UN SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN, ITS CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES Amnesty International presents the attached responses to the questionnaire on criminalization and prosecution of rape in Denmark. This submission has been prepared in response to the call for contributions issued by the United Nations (UN) Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences ahead of her upcoming report on rape as a grave and systematic human rights violation and a form of gender-based violence against women. Definition and scope of criminal law provisions 1. Please provide information on criminal law provision/s on rape (or analogous forms of serious sexual violence for those jurisdictions that do not have a rape classification) by providing full translated transcripts of the relevant Sections of the Criminal Code and the Criminal procedure code. Article 216 of the Danish Criminal Code states (unofficial translation): “A penalty of imprisonment for a term not exceeding eight years for rape is imposed on any person who (i) uses violence or threats of violence to have sexual intercourse; or (ii) engages in sexual intercourse by duress as defined in section 260 or with a person who is in a state or situation in which the person is incapable of resisting the act.”1 The flaws in Danish law on sexual violence are not confined to the definition of rape and its consequences. Articles 218-220 of the Criminal Code criminalize sexual intercourse in situations where a person exploits another person’s mental disability or their dependency, for instance in situations of deprivation of liberty, in institutions such as youth institutions or psychiatric wards.2 Article 221 of the Criminal Code criminalizes obtaining sexual intercourse through deception.3 The Criminal Code does not specify explicitly that these offences constitute rape and they carry lesser penalties than those defined as such in it.
    [Show full text]
  • Combating Domestic Violence Against Women in Turkey. the Role of Women’S Economic Empowerment Aurélien Dasre, Angela Greulich, Inan Ceren
    Combating domestic violence against women in Turkey. The role of women’s economic empowerment Aurélien Dasre, Angela Greulich, Inan Ceren To cite this version: Aurélien Dasre, Angela Greulich, Inan Ceren. Combating domestic violence against women in Turkey. The role of women’s economic empowerment. 2017. halshs-01660703 HAL Id: halshs-01660703 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01660703 Submitted on 14 Dec 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Documents de Travail du Centre d’Economie de la Sorbonne Combating domestic violence against women in Turkey. The role of women’s economic empowerment Aurélien DASRE, Angela GREULICH, Ceren INAN 2017.52 Maison des Sciences Économiques, 106-112 boulevard de L'Hôpital, 75647 Paris Cedex 13 http://centredeconomiesorbonne.univ-paris1.fr/ ISSN : 1955-611X Combating domestic violence against women in Turkey. The role of women’s economic empowerment. Aurélien Dasre1£ Angela Greulich* Ceren Inan¥ Abstract This paper identifies motors and barriers for combatting domestic violence against women in Turkey – a country where modernism and conservatism are in constant interplay. We combine information from the Demographic Health Surveys and the Turkish Domestic Violence Survey and distinguish between controlling behavior, physical and sexual violence.
    [Show full text]
  • Shadow NGO Report on Turkey's First Report on Legislative and Other
    Shadow NGO Report on Turkey’s First Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence for submission to the GREVIO Committee September 2017 Prepared by: Purple Roof Women’s Shelter Association, Foundation for Women’s Solidarity Women’s Solidarity Foundation Women for Women’s Human Rights – New Ways (WWHR) Equality Monitoring Women’s Group Association for Women with Disabilities Kaos Gay and Lesbian Cultural Research and Solidarity Foundation Association for Struggle Against Sexual Violence Endorsed by: Istanbul Convention Monitoring Platform1 - 1 The list of the 81 Members of İstanbul Convention Monitoring Platform can be found at Annex 1. 1 Foreword This shadow report was prepared in collaboration with women’s organizations in Turkey for the evaluation of the implementation of Istanbul Convention in Turkey by GREVIO committee this year. The report was drafted by 8 and endorsed by 81 women’s and LGBTIQ organizations to outline the emerging issues related to violence against women and the defects and malpractices with regards to the implementation of the Convention. Under the coordination of Purple Roof Women’s Shelters Association, we first started to come together to share tasks and agree on the time plan in order to prepare the report till the end of May, which was the deadline for the submission of the state report. However, as we found out later, Turkey delayed the submission till July without informing the CSOs, thus we had to decide to proceed to draft the NGO report without seeing the state’s report.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Conclusions of the Joint Annual Review Meeting on Progress of Implementation of the Partnership Agreement 2014-2020 in Cyprus
    Ref. Ares(2017)6350095 - 22/12/2017 Summary conclusions of the joint Annual Review Meeting on progress of implementation of the Partnership Agreement 2014-2020 in Cyprus Nicosia, 13 December 2017 On 13 December 2017 took place in Nicosia the joint Annual Review Meeting in accordance to Article 51 (2) of the CPR, covering all programmes and ESI Funds in Cyprus and taking account of the progress report on implementation of the Partnership Agreement as at 31 December 2016, following Article 52 of the CPR. The meeting was co-chaired by DG REGIO Director Mr Rudolf Niessler and DG EPCD Director Mr Costas Iacovou. Representatives of DG EMPL, DG MARE and DG REGIO also participated in the meeting. Cyprus presented the state of play of implementation of the Partnership Agreement by 31 December 2016. The initial pace of implementation was very slow at the end of 2016 for all ESI Funds (for ERDF in particular, no payment claim had been submitted to the Commission and only EUR 2.6 million had been declared for the Cohesion Fund). Around 60 calls of proposals had been launched by the end of 2016 whilst the activation of all programmes was only 32%. According to Cyprus, this was mostly due to the new regulations and guidelines for the management and implementation of ESI Funds in the programming period 2014-2020, which implied many changes at administrative level (modification of the Management and Control System, including the designation of authorities/agreements with the intermediate bodies, reformulation of the IT system for the management of the ESIFs, training to all bodies involved in the management and implementation of the Funds etc.).
    [Show full text]
  • The Istanbul Convention and the CEDAW Framework
    The Istanbul Convention and the CEDAW framework: A comparison1 of measures to prevent and combat violence against women Opened for signature in Istanbul in May 2011, the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence (Istanbul Convention) is the first legally-binding instrument in Europe in this field, and in terms of scope, the most far reaching international treaty to tackle this serious violation of human rights. It aims at zero tolerance for such violence and is a major step forward in making Europe and beyond a safer place. By accepting the Istanbul Convention, governments are obliged to change their laws, introduce practical measures and allocate resources to effectively prevent and combat violence against women and domestic violence. The Istanbul Convention codifies established standards, jurisprudence and developments at international level, as well as best practice at national level, thereby lending them more weight and ensuring their wider application. Drawing in particular on the framework of measures of the Convention on the Elimination of All forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) and case law developed by the CEDAW Committee, it is firmly based on the premise that violence against women cannot be eradicated without investing in gender equality and that in turn, only real gender equality and a change in attitudes can truly prevent such violence. The following tables describe the manner in which the Istanbul Convention builds on the three sources that constitute the CEDAW framework: the Convention, General Recommendations and case law. The tables also show how the Istanbul Convention complements these instruments by establishing a more detailed catalogue of legally-binding obligations to prevent and respond to violence against women.
    [Show full text]