TSC2- Deficient Cell Lines

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

TSC2- Deficient Cell Lines New drug therapies to kill TSC2- deficient cell lines Henry Denis McCann 1467575 2019 Thesis submitted to Cardiff University in fulfilment of the of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy This thesis is dedicated to Dr. Padraic O’Neill, for all the support given throughout the years. i Publications 1. Johnson, Charlotte E., Dunlop, Elaine A., Seifan, Sara, McCann, Henry D., Hay, Trevor, Parfitt, Geraint J., Jones, Ashley T., Giles, Peter J., Shen, Ming H., Sampson, Julian R., Errington, Rachel J., Davies, David Mark and Tee, Andrew R. 2018. Loss of tuberous sclerosis complex 2 sensitizes tumours to nelfinavir−bortezomib therapy to intensify endoplasmic reticulum stress- induced cell death. Oncogene 37, pp. 5913-5925 2. McCann, Henry, Johnson, Charlotte, Errington, Rachel, Davies, D. Mark, Dunlop, Elaine and Tee, Andrew 2018. Energy stress-mediated cytotoxicity in tuberous sclerosis complex 2-deficient cells with nelfinavir and mefloquine treatment. Cancers 10 (10), 375. ii Contents Publications........................................................................................................... ii Contents ............................................................................................................... iii Figures and Tables .............................................................................................. ix Figures: ............................................................................................................... ix Tables: ................................................................................................................. x Declaration ........................................................................................................... xi Acknowledgements ........................................................................................... xiii Abstract .............................................................................................................. xiv Abbreviations ...................................................................................................... xv Chapter 1: General Introduction .......................................................................... 1 1.1 Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC) .............................................................. 1 1.1.1 History and General Introduction ........................................................... 1 1.1.2 Clinical management of TSC ................................................................. 6 1.2 mTORC1 in tumour growth .......................................................................... 19 1.2.1 mTOR .................................................................................................. 19 1.2.2 mTORC1 and angiogenesis ................................................................ 25 1.2.3 mTORC1 and lipogenesis ................................................................... 26 1.2.4 mTORC1 and autophagy ..................................................................... 27 1.2.5 mTORC1 and energy metabolism ....................................................... 29 1.2.6 mTORC1 and mitochondrial biogenesis .............................................. 30 1.2.7 Potential vulnerabilities of TSC ............................................................ 31 1.3 Nelfinavir ...................................................................................................... 40 1.3.1 General Introduction ............................................................................ 40 1.3.2 Nelfinavir controversy .......................................................................... 41 1.3.3 Nelfinavir and cancer ........................................................................... 41 1.3.4 Nelfinavir and radiotherapy .................................................................. 44 iii 1.3.5 Nelfinavir and TSC .............................................................................. 44 1.4 Aims of Thesis ............................................................................................. 45 Chapter 2: Materials and Methods ..................................................................... 47 2.1 Materials: ..................................................................................................... 47 2.1.1 Cell culture........................................................................................... 47 2.1.2 Drugs ................................................................................................... 47 2.2 Methods: ...................................................................................................... 48 2.2.1 Cell proliferation assay ........................................................................ 48 2.2.2 Flow cytometry .................................................................................... 49 2.2.3 Drug synergy assay ............................................................................. 50 2.2.4 Western blotting ................................................................................... 51 2.2.5 Rescue assays .................................................................................... 53 2.2.6 mRNA extraction and reverse transcription ......................................... 54 2.2.7 XBP-1 splicing ..................................................................................... 54 2.2.8 RNA sequencing .................................................................................. 55 2.2.9 Rhodamine 123 assay ......................................................................... 56 2.2.10 Tumour formation assay .................................................................... 57 2.2.11 Tumour outgrowth assay ................................................................... 57 2.2.12 ROS production analysis ................................................................... 58 2.2.13 Protein synthesis assay ..................................................................... 59 2.2.14 Statistical analysis ............................................................................. 59 Chapter 3: Mefloquine and nelfinavir combination caused selective cell death in mTORC1 hyperactive cells .................................................................. 60 3.1 Introduction: ................................................................................................. 60 3.1.1 Mefloquine ........................................................................................... 60 3.1.2 Hypothesis ........................................................................................... 65 3.2 Results: ........................................................................................................ 66 iv 3.2.1 An optimized combination of mefloquine and nelfinavir synergises to selectively target mTORC1 hyperactive cells and causes caspase- independent cell death. ................................................................................ 66 3.2.2 Mefloquine/nelfinavir combination prevented tumour colony formation and prevented tumour regrowth from treated spheroids. .............................. 72 3.2.3 Mefloquine/nelfinavir combination targeted Tsc2-/- cells in a mTOR and autophagy/lysosomal-independent manner. ................................................. 74 3.2.4 Mefloquine and nelfinavir as single drug agents, as well as in combination, blocked P-glycoprotein activity in Tsc2+/+ and Tsc2-/- MEFS. 77 3.2.5 Mefloquine/nelfinavir combination induced enhanced and prolonged ER stress in Tsc2-/- cells via the PERK pathway. .............................................. 78 3.2.6 Mefloquine/nelfinavir combination affects energy stress levels in Tsc2-/- cells. 86 3.2.7 Mefloquine/nelfinavir combination did not affect the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS). ................................................................... 89 3.3 Discussion: .................................................................................................. 90 Chapter 4: A combination of Bortezomib and Nelfinavir caused selectively cell death in mTORC1 hyperactive cells ........................................................... 97 4.1 Introduction: ................................................................................................. 97 4.1.1 The proteasome .................................................................................. 97 4.1.2 Bortezomib .......................................................................................... 98 4.1.3 Bortezomib and blood cancers ............................................................ 99 4.1.4 Bortezomib and solid cancers ........................................................... 100 4.1.5 Bortezomib combinations .................................................................. 100 4.1.6 Bortezomib limitations ....................................................................... 101 4.1.7 Bortezomib and ER stress ................................................................. 102 4.1.8 Bortezomib and nelfinavir .................................................................. 103 4.1.9 Hypothesis ......................................................................................... 104 4.2 Results: ...................................................................................................... 104 4.2.1 A combination of Bortezomib and nelfinavir selectively targeted Tsc2-/- cells in a caspase-dependent manner. ....................................................... 104 v 4.2.2 Bortezomib/nelfinavir
Recommended publications
  • Gelred® and Gelgreen® Safety Report
    Safety Report for GelRed® and GelGreen® A summary of mutagenicity and environmental safety test results from three independent laboratories for the nucleic acid gel stains GelRed® and GelGreen® www.biotium.com General Inquiries: [email protected] Technical Support: [email protected] Phone: 800-304-5357 Conclusion Overview GelRed® and GelGreen® are a new generation of nucleic acid gel stains. Ethidium bromide (EB) has been the stain of choice for nucleic acid gel They possess novel chemical features designed to minimize the chance for staining for decades. The dye is inexpensive, sufficiently sensitive and very the dyes to interact with nucleic acids in living cells. Test results confirm that stable. However, EB is also a known powerful mutagen. It poses a major the dyes do not penetrate latex gloves or cell membranes. health hazard to the user, and efforts in decontamination and waste disposal ultimately make the dye expensive to use. To overcome the toxicity problem In the AMES test, GelRed® and GelGreen® are noncytotoxic and of EB, scientists at Biotium developed GelRed® and GelGreen® nucleic acid nonmutagenic at concentrations well above the working concentrations gel stains as superior alternatives. Extensive tests demonstrate that both used in gel staining. The highest dye concentrations shown to be non-toxic dyes have significantly improved safety profiles over EB. and non-mutagenic in the Ames test for GelRed® and GelGreen® dyes are 18.5-times higher than the 1X working concentration used for gel casting, and 6-times higher than the 3X working concentration used for gel staining. This Dye Design Principle is in contrast to SYBR® Safe, which has been reported to show mutagenicity At the very beginning of GelRed® and GelGreen® development, we made a in several strains in the presence of S9 mix (1).
    [Show full text]
  • Cell Surface Markers in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia* F
    ANNALS OF CLINICAL AND LABORATORY SCIENCE, Vol. 10, No. 3 Copyright © 1980, Institute for Clinical Science, Inc. Cell Surface Markers in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia* f G. BENNETT HUMPHREY, M.D., REBECCA BLACKSTOCK, Ph .D., AND JANICE FILLER, M.S. University of Oklahoma, Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73126 ABSTRACT During the last nine years, two important methodologies have been used to characterize the cell surfaces of normal lymphocytes and malignant lym­ phoblasts. Normal mature T-cells have a receptor for sheep erythrocytes (E+) while mature B-cells bear membrane-bound immunoglobulin molecules (slg+). These two findings can be used to divide acute lymphoblastic leukemia of childhood into three major groups; B-cell leukemia (slg+ E -), which is rare (approximately 2 percent) and has the poorest prognosis, T-cell leukemia (slg~, E +) which is more common (10 percent) but also has a poor prognosis and null cell leukemia (slg~, E~) which is the most common (85 percent) and has the best prognosis. By the use of additional immunological methods, subgroups within T-cell leukemia and null cell leukemia have also been proposed. One of the most valuable of these additional methods is the detection of surface antigens. Three of the more commonly detected antigens currently being evaluated are (1) common leukemia antigen (cALL), (2) a normal B Lymphocyte antigen the la antigen (la) which is not generally expressed on most T lympho­ cytes and (3) a normal T lymphocyte antigen (T) not expressed on B lympho­ cytes. Within null cell leukemia, the most commonly identified and proba­ bly the largest subgroup is Ia+, cALL+, T”, E _, slg-.
    [Show full text]
  • Separation and Functional Studies of the Human Lymphokine-Activated Killer Cell Kevan Roberts, Michael T
    [CANCER RESEARCH 47, 4366-4371, August 15, 1987] Separation and Functional Studies of the Human Lymphokine-activated Killer Cell Kevan Roberts, Michael T. Lotze,1 and Steven A. Rosenberg Surgery Branch, National Cancer Institute, NÃŒH,Betnesda,Maryland 20892 ABSTRACT undefined. The purification of cells responsible for LAK activity was desirable to further assess their morphology, phenotype, Cell separation studies were undertaken in an attempt to purify the and target cell binding properties prior to and following IL-2 lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) precursor cell. Null cells, prepared stimulation. by the sequential depletion of monocytes, T- and B-lymphocytes from human peripheral blood mononuclear cells, were found to be potent mediators of LAK activity. Such preparations were Leu-11* but Leu-4" MATERIALS AND METHODS and displayed high levels of natural killer activity. Incubation of these cells with recombinant interleukin 2 (11-2) for periods in excess of 24 h Media. All cell lines were maintained in suspension culture using RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 ng/m\ penicillin, 100 induced LAK lysis of fresh tumor targets which were resistant to lysis Mg/ml streptomycin, and 1% glutamine. CM consisted of RPMI 1640 by unstimulated null effectors. In contrast, lymphocytes which formed high affinity rosettes with sheep RBC (I-* lymphocytes) were poor supplemented with 10% human AB serum, antibiotics, and glutamine. Conjugation buffer, at pH 7.3, was prepared by adding 683 mg of NaCl, mediators of both natural killer and LAK activity. Interleukin 2 stimu lated null cells, retained a Leu-ll*, I.t-u-4 phenotype, and expressed 142 mg of MgCl2 6H2O, and 66 mg of CaCl2-6H2O to 450 ml of PBS supplemented with 50 ml of FBS, antibiotics, and 10 HIM4-(2-hydrox- only low levels of receptors for II,-2 and transferrin.
    [Show full text]
  • Genotyping in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke
    Tuttolomondo et al. Journal of Neuroinflammation (2019) 16:88 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-019-1469-5 RESEARCH Open Access HLA and killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor (KIRs) genotyping in patients with acute ischemic stroke Antonino Tuttolomondo1*† , Domenico Di Raimondo1†, Rosaria Pecoraro6,7, Alessandra Casuccio2, Danilo Di Bona5, Anna Aiello3, Giulia Accardi3, Valentina Arnao4, Giuseppe Clemente1, Vittoriano Della Corte8, Carlo Maida1, Irene Simonetta1, Calogero Caruso3, Rosario Squatrito6, Antonio Pinto1 and on behalf of KIRIIND (KIR Infectious and Inflammatory Diseases) Collaborative Group Abstract Introduction: In humans, a major component of natural killer (NK) and T cell target recognition depends on the surveillance of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I molecules by killer immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIRs). Aims: To implement the knowledge about the immunological genetic background of acute ischemic stroke susceptibility in relation to the frequency of the KIR genes and HLA alleles. Methods: Subjects with acute ischemic stroke and subjects without stroke were genotyped for the presence of KIR genes and of the three major KIR ligand groups, HLA-C1, HLA-C2, and HLA-Bw4, both HLA-B and HLA-A loci. Results: Between November 2013 and February 2016, consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke were recruited. As healthy controls, we enrolled subjects without acute ischemic stroke. Subjects with acute ischemic stroke in comparison with controls showed a higher frequency of 2DL3, 2DL5B, 2DS2, and 2DS4 KIR genes and a lower frequency of HLA-B-Bw4I alleles. Subjects without acute ischemic stroke showed a higher frequency of interaction between KIR 2DS2 and HLAC2. We also observed a higher frequency of 2DL3 and 2 DL4 KIR genes in subjects with atherosclerotic (LAAS) subtype.
    [Show full text]
  • Gelred™& Gelgreen™
    Glowing Products for ScienceTM GelRed™& GelGreen™ www.biotium.com Safe and sensitive nucleic acid gel stains designed to replace the highly toxic ethidium bromide (EtBr). Developed by G scientists at Biotium, GelRed™ and GelGreen™ are superior to EtBr and other SYBR® Safe GelRed™ GelGreen™ EtBr alternatives by having a combination of low toxicity, high sensitivity and exceptional stability. EtBr has been the predominant dye used for nucleic acid gel staining for decades mutagenic chemical. The safety hazard and costs associated with decontamination and waste disposal can ultimately make the dye expensive and inconvenient to use. For this reason, alternative gel stains, such as SYBR® dyes, have become commercially available Figure 2. GelRed™ and GelGreen™ gel stains are safer because they cannot penetrate cell in recent years. While these alternative dyes have reduced mutagenicity membranes to bind DNA in living cells. HeLa cells were incubated at 37oC with 1X SYBR® Safe, sensitivity and stability. For example, SYBR® Safe has very limited sensitivity while GelGreen™ or GelRed™, respectively. Images were taken following incubation with dye for 30 SYBR® Green and SYBR® Gold are much less stable than EtBr. SYBR® dyes also enter SYBR® Safe rapidly entered cells and stained nuclei. GelRed™ and GelGreen™ were unable cells rapidly to stain mitochondria and nuclear DNA, making it more likely for the dyes to be harmful to cells. Indeed, SYBR® Green I has been shown to strongly potentiate DNA was observed in dead cells present sporadically in the cultures, as is observed with other non- mutation caused by UV light and other mutagens (Ohta, et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Kinetic Properties and Characterization of Purified Proteases from Pacific Whiting
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF JuWen Wu for the degree of Master of Science in Food Science and Technology presented on March 10. 1994 . Title: Kinetic Properties and Characterization of Purified Proteases from Pacific Whiting (Merluccius productus) . Abstract approved: ._ ■^^HaejWg An Kinetic properties of the two proteases, causing textural degradation of Pacific whiting (Merluccius productus) during heating, were compared and characterized with the synthetic substrate, Z-Phe-Arg-NMec. Pacific whiting P-I and P-II showed the highest specificity on Z-Phe-Arg-NMec, specific substrate for cathepsin L. The Km of 1 preactivated P-I and P-II were 62.98 and 76.02 (^M), and kcat, 2.38 and 1.34 (s" ) against Z-Phe-Arg-NMec at pH 7.0 and 30°C, respectively. Optimum pH stability for preactivated P-I and P-II is between 4.5 and 5.5. Both enzymes showed similar pH- induced preactivation profiles at 30oC. The maximal activity for both enzymes was obtained by preactivating the enzyme at a range of pH 5.5 to 7.5. The highest activation rate for both enzymes was determined at pH 7.5. At pH 5.5, the rate to reach the maximal activity was the slowest, but the activity was stable up to 1 hr. P-I and P-II shared similar temperature profiles at pH 5.5 and pH 7.0 studied. Optimum temperatures at pH 5.5 and 7.0 for both proteases on the same substrate were 550C. Significant thermal inactivation for both enzymes was shown at 750C.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
    126 (2) J Immunol 1981; 126:393-810; ; http://www.jimmunol.org/content/126/2.citation This information is current as of October 1, 2021. Downloaded from Why The JI? Submit online. • Rapid Reviews! 30 days* from submission to initial decision • No Triage! Every submission reviewed by practicing scientists http://www.jimmunol.org/ • Fast Publication! 4 weeks from acceptance to publication *average Subscription Information about subscribing to The Journal of Immunology is online at: http://jimmunol.org/subscription Permissions Submit copyright permission requests at: by guest on October 1, 2021 http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html Email Alerts Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at: http://jimmunol.org/alerts The Journal of Immunology is published twice each month by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc., 1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852 All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0022-1767 Online ISSN: 1550-6606. THE JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY Volume 126/Number 2 Contents CELLULAR IMMUNOLOGY K. Kudo, A. H. Sehon, and R. J. 403 The Role of Antigen-Presenting Cells in the IgE Antibody Response. I. The Induction Schwenk of High Titer IgE Antibody Responses in IgE High-Responder and Low-Responder Mice by the Administration of Antigen-Pulsed Macrophages in the Absence of Adjuvants D. A. Hubbard, W. Y. Lee, and A. 407 Suppression of the Anti-DNP IgE Response with Tolerogenic Conjugates of DNP H. Sehon with Polyvinyl Alcohol. I. Specific Suppression of the Anti-DNP IgE Response W. Y. Lee and A. H. Sehon 41 4 Suppression of the Anti-DNP IgE Response with Tolerogenic Conjugates of DNP with Polyvinyl Alcohol.
    [Show full text]
  • Expression of Ligands for Activating Natural Killer Cell Receptors on Cell
    Tremblay-McLean et al. BMC Immunology (2019) 20:8 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12865-018-0272-x RESEARCHARTICLE Open Access Expression of ligands for activating natural killer cell receptors on cell lines commonly used to assess natural killer cell function Alexandra Tremblay-McLean1,2, Sita Coenraads1, Zahra Kiani1,2, Franck P. Dupuy1 and Nicole F. Bernard1,2,3,4* Abstract Background: Natural killer cell responses to virally-infected or transformed cells depend on the integration of signals received through inhibitory and activating natural killer cell receptors. Human Leukocyte Antigen null cells are used in vitro to stimulate natural killer cell activation through missing-self mechanisms. On the other hand, CEM.NKr.CCR5 cells are used to stimulate natural killer cells in an antibody dependent manner since they are resistant to direct killing by natural killer cells. Both K562 and 721.221 cell lines lack surface major histocompatibility compatibility complex class Ia ligands for inhibitory natural killer cell receptors. Previous work comparing natural killer cell stimulation by K562 and 721.221 found that they stimulated different frequencies of natural killer cell functional subsets. We hypothesized that natural killer cell function following K562, 721.221 or CEM.NKr.CCR5 stimulation reflected differences in the expression of ligands for activating natural killer cell receptors. Results: K562 expressed a higher intensity of ligands for Natural Killer G2D and the Natural Cytotoxicity Receptors, which are implicated in triggering natural killer cell cytotoxicity. 721.221 cells expressed a greater number of ligands for activating natural killer cell receptors. 721.221 expressed cluster of differentiation 48, 80 and 86 with a higher mean fluorescence intensity than did K562.
    [Show full text]
  • UBC's Safer Alternatives to Ethidium Bromide
    Risk Management Services Environmental Services www.riskmanagement.ubc.ca/environment Safer Alternatives to Ethidium Bromide Different types of dyes are used to stain nucleic acids in the preparation and use of electrophoresis gels. The hazard properties of various products, and hence the disposal requirements, are very different. While some products are completely safe or less toxic, others are mutagenic and require special handling and disposal procedures. As new products become available it is important to clarify the hazard properties and disposal requirements of these dyes. [Photo from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethidium_bromide] Non-Mutagenic Dyes SYBR®Safe, GelRed™, GelGreen™, and EvaGreen®. Independent licensed testing laboratories have determined in Ames tests that these dyes are non-mutagenic. Mutagenic Dyes The following dyes have been determined to have mutagenic and/or toxic properties: Ethidium Bromide, Methylene Blue, Crystal Violet, Propidium Iodide, Acridine Orange, SYBR®Green I, SYBR®Green II, SYBR®Gold and GelStar™. All gels containing these dyes, unwanted dye stock solutions, and all contaminated debris must be handled and disposed as hazardous waste. For details refer to the Laboratory Pollution Prevention and Hazardous Waste Management Manual. Learn More (below is a comparison of some commonly used DNA stains): Ethidium Bromide Ethidium bromide (3,8-Diamino-5-ethyl-6- phenylphenanthridinium bromide) is the classic DNA stain. Ethidium bromide (EtBr) is a flat molecule that fits between adjacent base pairs (intercalates) in the DNA double helix. It has UV absorbance maxima at 300 and 360nm, and can also absorb energy from nucleotides excited at 260nm. The absorbed energy is emitted as orange/yellow light at 590nm.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissection of Distinct Human Immunoregulatory T-Cell Subsets by A
    Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 78, No. 5, pp. 3160-3164, May 1981 Immunology Dissection of distinct human immunoregulatory T-cell subsets by a monoclonal antibody recognizing a cell surface antigen with wide tissue distribution (T- and B-cell lines/T- and B-cell leukemias/helper and suppressor T cells) OSCAR H. IRIGOYEN*, PHILIP V. RIZZOLO*, YOLENE THOMAS*, MARTIN E. HEMLERt, HARRY H-L SHEN* STEVEN M. FRIEDMAN*, JACK L. STROMINGERt, AND LEONARD CHESS* *Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York 10032; and tSidney Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02115 Contributed by Jack L. Strominger, December 31, 1980 ABSTRACT A monoclonal antibody, PVR-1, was obtained wide tissue distribution but is preferentially expressed on pre- after hybridization of X63Ag8.653 murine myeloma cells with cursors of helper T lymphocytes. spleen cells from a mouse immunized with human lymphocytes. It recognizes a 175,000- to 185,000-dalton surface antigen present on -"80% ofnormal human peripheral T lymphocytes, 50% ofnon- MATERIALS AND METHODS T non-B cells, and <10% ofB cells as determined by complement- dependent microcytotoxicity. It is also present on various leukemia Lymphocytes, Cell Lines, and Leukemic Cells. Fresh pe- T cells, on some but not all T lymphoblastoid cell lines, and on a ripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated from healthy small fraction of some B lymphoblastoid cell lines. Some B-cell human volunteers by Ficoll/diatrizoate density gradient cen- chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells also express the PVR-11 anti- trifugation. Highly enriched populations of T and B cells were gen.
    [Show full text]
  • Gelred Flyer
    Glowing Products for ScienceTM GelRedTM & GelGreenTM Environmentally safe and ultra-sensitive nucleic acid gel stains for replacing EtBr April 6, 2009 GelRed Is Superior to EtBr GelRed EtBr FEATURES Safer than EtBr Shown by Ames test and other tests to be nonmutagenic and noncytotoxic. Easy disposal Passed environmental safety tests for direct disposal down the drain or in regular trash. Ultra-sensitive Much more sensitive than EtBr and SYBR Safe. Extremely stable Available in water, stable at room temperature for long-term storage and microwavable. Figure 1. Comparison of GelRed and ethidium bromide (EtBr) in precast gel staining using 1% agaose gel in TBE buffer. Two-fold serial dilutions of 1 kb Plus DNA Ladder from Invitrogen were loaded onto each gel in 4 lanes in the amounts of 200 ng, 100 ng, 50 ng and 25 ng, respectively, from left to right. Flexible for different procedures Gels were imaged using a 300-nm transilluminator and photographed with an EtBr filter and Polaroid Can be used for either precast or post gel staining 667 black-and-white print films. Simple to use Very simple procedures for precast and post gel stainings. Perfect Compatibility with a Standard UV Transilluminator or a Gel Reader with GelGreen Is Simply Unmatched Visible Light Excitation by SYBR Safe GelRed replaces EtBr with no optical setting change; GelGreen replaces SYBR or GelStar with GelGreen SYBR Safe no optical setting change(See Figure 3 for spectra). GelGreen Excitation Gel Green Emission GelRed Emission GelRed Excitation 200 300 400 500 600 700 Wavelength (nm) Figure 2. Comparison of GelGreen and SYBR Safe in post gel staining using 1% aga- rose gel in TBE buffer.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Nucleic Acid Gel Stains Cell Permeability, Safety, And
    Glowing Products for Science™ www.biotium.com February 1, 2017 Comparison of Nucleic Acid Gel Stains Cell permeability, safety, and sensitivity of ethidium bromide alternatives Mikhail Guzaev, Xue Li, Candice Park, Wai-Yee Leung, and Lori Roberts Biotium, Inc., Fremont, CA Introduction Chemical analysis Nucleic acid gel stains were analyzed by thin layer chromatography (TLC). Dye Ethidium bromide has been used for decades to detect nucleic acids in agarose gels absorbance spectra were measured using a Beckman Coulter DU-800 UV-visible because it is inexpensive, sensitive enough for routine applications, and simple to spectrophotometer. Dye fluorescence emission spectra were measured in the presence use. However, because ethidium bromide has been shown to be mutagenic in the of double stranded DNA using a Hitachi F-4500 fluorescence spectrophotometer. Mass Ames test, it is potentially hazardous to laboratory workers and the environment, and spectrometry (LC-MS) was performed on an Agilent 6130 Quadrupole System. C18 institutions commonly require it to be disposed of as hazardous waste. Because of this, reverse phase HPLC was performed on an Agilent 1100 Series System. DAPI (catalog many users seek to find safer alternatives to ethidium bromide for gel electrophoresis. no. 40011), propidium iodide (catalog no. 40016), and acridine orange (catalog no. Biotium developed red fluorescent GelRed™ and green fluorescent GelGreen™ as 40039) from Biotium were used as reference dyes. Acridine orange from Sigma-Aldrich safer replacements for ethidium bromide. GelRed™ and GelGreen™ are non-toxic and (catalog no. 235474) also was used for reference. non-mutagenic because they do not bind DNA in living cells due to their membrane impermeability.
    [Show full text]