DOCSLIB.ORG

The Governing Crisis: Exploring Solutions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Governing Crisis: Exploring Solutions CONFERENCE REPORT The Governing Crisis: Exploring Solutions Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law ABOUT THE BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE The Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law is a nonpartisan law and policy institute that seeks to improve our systems of democracy and justice. We work to hold our political institutions and laws accountable to the twin American ideals of democracy and equal justice for all. The Center’s work ranges from voting rights to campaign finance reform, from racial justice in criminal law to Constitutional protection in the fight against terrorism. A singular institution — part think tank, part public interest law firm, part advocacy group, part communications hub — the Brennan Center seeks meaningful, measurable change in the systems by which our nation is governed. ABOUT THE BRENNAN CENTER’S PUBLICATIONS Red cover | Research reports offer in-depth empirical findings. Blue cover | Policy proposals offer innovative, concrete reform solutions. White cover | White papers offer a compelling analysis of a pressing legal or policy issue. © 2014. This paper is covered by the Creative Commons “Attribution-No Derivs-NonCommercial” license (see http://cre- ativecommons.org). It may be reproduced in its entirety as long as the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law is credited, a link to the Center’s web page is provided, and no charge is imposed. The paper may not be reproduced in part or in altered form, or if a fee is charged, without the Center’s permission. Please let the Center know if you reprint. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Brennan Center is tremendously grateful to the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation for supporting this convening — and especially Larry Kramer and Daniel Stid for their critical partnership, interest, and enthusiasm. We also wish to thank those who generously support the Brennan Center’s work to revitalize our democracy: The Bauman Foundation, Democracy Alliance partners, Ford Foundation, Irving Harris Foundation, The Joyce Foundation, The JPB Foundation, The Kohlberg Foundation, The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, Mertz Gilmore Foundation, Open Society Foundations, Overbrook Foundation, Piper Fund, Rockefeller Brothers Fund, Rockefeller Family Fund, Jennifer and Jonathan Allan Soros Foundation, Wallace Global Fund, and the WhyNot Initiative. We are especially grateful to Mark Schmitt for his vision and insight in shaping the program. This summary document would not have been possible without the leadership of Michael Waldman and John Kowal, and the effort of many Brennan Center colleagues, including Alicia Bannon, Jennifer Clark, Johanna Kalb, Lawrence Norden, Erik Opsal, Jeanine Plant-Chirlin, Desiree Ramos Reiner, Jafreen Uddin, Daniel Weiner, and Wendy Weiser. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Statement of Purpose 3 Opening Remarks 4 The Government Shutdown: A Case Study 8 Governing Structures and Congressional Reform 12 Political Money and Economic Inequality 15 Opportunities for Bipartisan Democracy Reform 19 Keynote Address 21 Cultural Polarization 24 Political Parties and Candidate Selection 25 Geographic Polarization and the Role of Redistricting 27 Political Strategies 29 Appendices A: Participants 33 B: Agenda 38 INTRODUCTION On February 12-13, 2014 the Brennan Center for Different communities brought preconceptions — Justice convened a group of 80 scholars, advocates, and had those preconceptions challenged. Social journalists, foundation leaders and philanthropists justice-oriented groups and funders grappled with at NYU School of Law for a series of discussions on the “dysfunction” frame. Reform ideas must be government dysfunction. The conference was conceived assessed not just through the lens of “democracy” at the height of worry over the government shutdown but also “governability.” If government and the and latest debt ceiling debacle. It soon gravitated toward political system are not rendered more functional, larger, longer-term ambitions. The Center — and on a basic level, no underlying policy changes are organizations like ours — must grapple with governing possible. Funders and scholars who focus, especially, crisis that besets the country, a task that will require new on “polarization” as the ill to be addressed grappled thinking and focused effort. Our goal for the two days: with the need to embrace structural reforms, to facilitate discussions that moved beyond arguments and not just changes in norms and practices. about causes of the current state of dysfunction and, rather, begin to identify potential viable solutions. • All grappled with a fundamental challenge for funders, nonprofit groups, scholars and journalists: Among the repeated themes and lessons from the two how to address intrinsically political questions day gathering: through a necessarily nonpartisan lens. We must beware the fallacy of technocratic solutions. • Across the political spectrum, participants shared Today’s problems have deep political roots — the a sense of urgency — even alarm — over the solutions must be inevitably, intrinsically political. collapse of effective government. This is not just It is naive to expect solutions to come without messy governance as usual. Something new, and wider public engagement and political conflict. disturbing, seemed evident to most participants. • Repeatedly, participants asked whether • Cures for dysfunction are structural as well as dysfunction is a genuine crisis, or merely the cultural. Reformers should avoid the fallacy most recent swing of a cyclical pattern. Perhaps of assuming that tweaking rules or tightening it’s always been this bad. Or perhaps it will work procedures can overcome deep-seated divisions. itself out, as moderates battle extremists and self- At the same time, merely wishing for partisans interest drives leaders to the bargaining table. to cast aside their animosities is a hope never Or perhaps, as too often seems likely, this really likely to be achieved. Recognizing cultural and does reflect a new, worrisome and dangerous political trends, the participants gravitated degradation of America’s democratic experiment. toward reforms that could steer political actors toward more productive governance. We sought • One dividing line: Some participants believed to avoid false choices, and largely succeeded. the governmental breakdown on display is best understood as a consequence of widening • The conference produced some surprises. In economic inequality and spreading stagnation. particular, some stressed the importance of party They see the most worrisome polarization as top- leadership ... and skepticism about openness and down, not left-right. Given these broad trends, transparency as an effective mode for governance. they suggested, it would be a surprise if the political THE GOVERNING CRISIS: EXploring Solutions | 1 system worked better than it did. Others saw the challenges of the political system (e.g., the ability of wealthy interests to stall or steer policy change) as a cause of economic malaise. In any case, they argued, political reform is a necessary precondition to policies that could help spur economic revival. In all, we explored seven topics — the summary of each panel discussion is described as a section in this report. In addition, we heard an evening keynote and a funder- led and focused summary at the close of the event. Sessions were held in a “discussant-style” format to facilitate participation from the entire audience, along with the moderator and panelists. There were a few variations: the session on “Opportunities for Bipartisan Democracy Reform,” featured the co-chairs of the Presidential Commission on Election Administration engaging in a lively moderated dialogue; the panel on “Cultural Polarization” was a Q&A over dinner. The sections that follow each provide a summary of the discussions that ensued, followed by the Brennan Center’s assessment of follow up questions to be explored via research. Recordings of the discussions are available, as well, on the Center’s web site (www.brennancenter. org). Other resources included as appendices with this summary: the event program; bios of the moderators and panelists, and the full list of participants. 2 | BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE STATEMENT OF PURPOSE In advance of the event we shared the following by periods of progress and action. But there are statement of purpose: strong reasons to believe today’s dilemmas go deeper than in decades. Dysfunction has profound How can we get American government working structural roots. Stronger leadership or a generous again? spirit of compromise will not be enough. Solutions, in the long run, demand systemic change. Consider the past two years: Shutdowns. Debt ceiling debacles. Endless filibusters. A polarized Congress. We see today’s government dysfunction as a confluence Judgeships and executive branch jobs unfilled. of four forces: Trust in government plunging to its lowest level in decades. The spectacle of billionaires sponsoring Partisanship: America’s two major political parties presidential candidates like racehorses. No wonder are now divided along ideological lines, with none the Gallup Poll last fall identified governmental of the overlap that for much of the 20th century dysfunction as the country’s number one concern. created a space for bargaining and consensus. On every dimension, government has failed to find Polarization: Elected legislators, particularly in one pragmatic solutions or respond to fundamental public party, respond to their
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Murray PR.Qxd
    Media inquiries: Véronique Rodman 202.862.4871 ([email protected]) Orders: 1.800.462.6420 or 1.717.794.3800 IN OUR HANDS: A PLAN TO REPLACE THE WELFARE STATE By Charles Murray With his new book, In Our Hands: A Plan to Replace the Welfare State, Charles Murray offers a radical solution to the problems of the entitlement system: get rid of it entirely and give $10,000 a year to every American adult. FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: March 25, 2006 The AEI Press Charles Murray offers a plan that would eliminate all income transfer programs at the federal, state, and local levels—including Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, welfare, and corporate subsidies—and would substitute an annual cash grant of $10,000 for life, beginning at age twenty-one. Murray argues that “the Plan” would end poverty, allow all Americans access to health care, and empower people to control their own lives. Murray’s book describes the financial feasibility of his ideas and their effect on retirement, health care, poverty, marriage and family, work, neighborhoods, and the larger civil society. In his seminal 1984 book Losing Ground, Murray sparked national debate by arguing that the social programs of the Great Society not only failed to help the poor and disadvan- taged, but also made things worse. Now, Murray has written a book that is, in his own words, “not a book about poverty. It’s about building a society in which people can run their own lives.” Once again, Charles Murray is ahead of his time: • Today, about 36 million people are below the poverty line.
    [Show full text]
  • Traditional Institutions, Social Change, and Same-Sex Marriage
    WAX.DOC 10/5/2005 1:41 PM The Conservative’s Dilemma: Traditional Institutions, Social Change, and Same-Sex Marriage AMY L. WAX* I. INTRODUCTION What is the meaning of marriage? The political fault lines that have emerged in the last election on the question of same-sex marriage suggest that there is no consensus on this issue. This article looks at the meaning of marriage against the backdrop of the same-sex marriage debate. Its focus is on the opposition to same-sex marriage. Drawing on the work of some leading conservative thinkers, it investigates whether a coherent, secular case can be made against the legalization of same-sex marriage and whether that case reflects how opponents of same-sex marriage think about the issue. In examining these questions, the article seeks more broadly to achieve a deeper understanding of the place of marriage in social life and to explore the implications of the recent controversy surrounding its reform. * Professor of Law, University of Pennsylvania Law School. 1059 WAX.DOC 10/5/2005 1:41 PM One striking aspect of the debate over the legal status of gay relationships is the contrast between public opinion, which is sharply divided, and what is written about the issue, which is more one-sided. A prominent legal journalist stated to me recently, with grave certainty, that there exists not a single respectable argument against the legal recognition of gay marriage. The opponents’ position is, in her word, a “nonstarter.” That viewpoint is reflected in discussions of the issue that appear in the academic literature.
    [Show full text]
  • George HW Bush and CHIREP at the UN 1970-1971
    University of New Orleans ScholarWorks@UNO University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations Dissertations and Theses Spring 5-22-2020 The First Cut is the Deepest: George H.W. Bush and CHIREP at the U.N. 1970-1971 James W. Weber Jr. University of New Orleans, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td Part of the American Popular Culture Commons, Asian History Commons, Cultural History Commons, Diplomatic History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Weber, James W. Jr., "The First Cut is the Deepest: George H.W. Bush and CHIREP at the U.N. 1970-1971" (2020). University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations. 2756. https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td/2756 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by ScholarWorks@UNO with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights- holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The First Cut is the Deepest : George H.W. Bush and CHIREP at the U.N. 1970–1971 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of New Orleans in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History by James W.
    [Show full text]
  • National Security and Local Police
    BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE NATIONAL SECURITY AND LOCAL POLICE Michael Price Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law ABOUT THE BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE The Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law is a nonpartisan law and policy institute that seeks to improve our systems of democracy and justice. We work to hold our political institutions and laws accountable to the twin American ideals of democracy and equal justice for all. The Center’s work ranges from voting rights to campaign finance reform, from racial justice in criminal law to Constitutional protection in the fight against terrorism. A singular institution — part think tank, part public interest law firm, part advocacy group, part communications hub — the Brennan Center seeks meaningful, measurable change in the systems by which our nation is governed. ABOUT THE BRENNAN CENTER’S LIBERTY AND NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAM The Brennan Center’s Liberty and National Security Program works to advance effective national security policies that respect Constitutional values and the rule of law, using innovative policy recommendations, litigation, and public advocacy. The program focuses on government transparency and accountability; domestic counterterrorism policies and their effects on privacy and First Amendment freedoms; detainee policy, including the detention, interrogation, and trial of terrorist suspects; and the need to safeguard our system of checks and balances. ABOUT THE BRENNAN CENTER’S PUBLICATIONS Red cover | Research reports offer in-depth empirical findings. Blue cover | Policy proposals offer innovative, concrete reform solutions. White cover | White papers offer a compelling analysis of a pressing legal or policy issue.
    [Show full text]
  • The Importance of Social Welfare in the Developing World
    ! The Importance of Social Welfare in the Developing World Mohit Prodhan University of Information Technology & Sciences Cathleen Jo Faruque Winona State University Numerous non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and international non-governmental organiza- tions (INGOs) have been working on a massive scale in Bangladesh parallel to the existing govern- mental efforts to alleviate poverty. There have been many success stories, however, more is needed and a change in approach and philosophy is thus called for. To increase efficiency of the various social welfare programs greater coordination of NGOs by the government is essential. This also calls for well trained workers in the field and Bangladesh has good training programs in social work pro- vided by different universities. As the history of social work, as a profession, has historical roots in the Western world, the curricula followed by the different programs in the country are based on western curricula. There is growing realization, however, of the importance and relevance of in- digenization of social work in a globalized world and the curricula in different countries need to be modified to suit individual local areas and populations. Additionally an element of internationaliza- tion is also required in order to better train individual workers to work with a myriad of different environments the new world offers. Social Work in Bangladesh Social work is a profession that is integral and interwoven in all societies. How- ever, the extent of the type of social work in any given country is often under debate. In a densely populated and deeply impoverished country such as Bang- ladesh there is little doubt that the social welfare networks should be extensive and well coordinated.
    [Show full text]
  • Sean Fraga, Ph.D. Curriculum Vitae April 2020
    Sean Fraga, Ph.D. Curriculum vitae April 2020 209 New South 237 Sullivan Place, Apt. D2 Princeton University Brooklyn, N.Y. 11225 Princeton, N.J. 08544 1-206-295-0823 [email protected] seanfraga.com EDUCATION Degrees Ph.D., History, Princeton University, January 2019. Advisor: Marni Sandweiss. M.A., History, Princeton University, May 2015. B.A., American Studies (intensive), with distinction in the major, Yale University, 2010. Advisor: Jean-Christophe Agnew. Certifications Teaching Transcript, McGraw Center for Teaching and Learning, Princeton Univ., 2019. PROFESSIONAL APPOINTMENTS Mellon Postdoctoral Fellow, Humanities in a Digital World Program, University of Southern California. Fall 2020 to Spring 2021. Lecturer, Princeton Writing Program, Princeton University. Fall 2019 to Spring 2020. Postgraduate Research Associate, Department of History and Center for Digital Humanities, Princeton University. Spring/Summer 2019. PUBLICATIONS Books Ocean Fever: Steam, Trade, and the American Creation of the Terraqueous Pacific Northwest. Under contract, Yale University Press (Lamar Series in Western History). Journal articles 2020 ”’An Outlet to the Western Sea’: Puget Sound, Terraqueous Mobility, and Northern Pacific Railroad’s Pursuit of Trade with Asia, 1864–1892,” Western Historical Quarterly, forthcoming (Winter 2020). 2014 ”Native Americans, Military Science, and Settler Colonialism on the Pacific Railroad Surveys, 1853–1855,” Princeton University Library Chronicle, vol. 75, no. 3 (Spring 2014): 317–349. Received the Friends of the Princeton University Library Prize for Outstanding Scholarship by a Graduate Student. Journal articles under revision 2020 ”They Came on Waves of Ink: Digitally Mapping Pacific Northwest Maritime [email protected] Page 1 of 9 Trade Networks at the Dawn of American Settlement, 1851–61.” For resubmission to Current Research in Digital History.
    [Show full text]
  • House Rules in Subsection (B)
    H. RES. 6 ADOPTING THE RULES FOR THE 116th CONGRESS SECTION-BY-SECTION ANALYSIS Title I. Rules of the One Hundred Sixteenth Congress Section 101. Adoption of the Rules of the One Hundred Fifteenth Congress. This section provides that the Rules of the 115th Congress are the Rules of the 116th Congress, except for the amendments contained in section 102 of the resolution and orders contained in the resolution. Section 102. Changes to the Standing Rules. Notification of Convening of the House. Subsection (a) clarifies that Delegates and the Resident Commissioner must be notified of action regarding the convening of the House pursuant to clause 12 of rule I. Voting by Delegates and the Resident Commissioner in the Committee of the Whole. Subsection (b) extends the same powers and privileges of Members to Delegates and the Resident Commissioner when in the Committee of the Whole. The subsection also provides that any recorded vote in the Committee of the Whole, decided within a margin where the Delegates and the Resident Commissioner may have had a decisive impact on the final outcome of the vote, will be re-conducted in the House. Allowing Delegates and the Resident Commissioner to Serve on Joint Committees. Subsection (c) provides that Delegates and the Resident Commissioner may serve on joint committees. Admittance to the Hall of the House. Subsection (d) adds Delegates-elect, the Resident Commissioner-elect, contestants in elections for Delegate or the Resident Commissioner, and Governors of the Territories to the list of people who are permitted in the Hall of the House. Office of Speaker.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Post Obama Birth Certificate
    Washington Post Obama Birth Certificate Is Martie always unstamped and knifeless when remedies some phyllody very smokelessly and uxoriously? When Florian reapplies his stridence overinsure not forgivably enough, is Frankie phrasal? Theodoric still espy rather while patrician Ken gave that contraption. All year after his presidential candidate renouncing the birth certificate purposes of controversy that is with limited His campaign's statement that Trump accepts the need of. Our website link url was born in which casts doubt about whether he pretends clinton supporters attending church in our world with what caused him on. Is made Press accept at Calling Out Birther Lies On the Media. Was Obama Born in Hawaii? Next is a certificate. Donald Trump the main supporter of false claims about Barack Obama's birthplace finally accepts the president was born in the US period. Finally on Friday Trump himself begrudgingly gave an extremely brief statement that President Barack Obama was born in the United States. Obama was born in the United States. Unmoored from the executive suite, he slide a fallback. Clinton backers to support Republican nominee Sen. Join Washingtonians Patrick Fort and Ruth Tam as sour taste their day around the refrigerator telling stories of slow change through my most iconic foods. Now we hope would open up, birth certificate of employees, a post reported by letting their birth certificate fraud. Got twisted and state and for donald trump. You know his contract called her own background is on cable tv interviews, some commentators noted boston sports and global warming is. Dubner of issuing entities by washington post obama birth certificate produced by washington is important in world ahead of fraud.
    [Show full text]
  • Rules Are Made to Be
    Missouri Law Review Volume 31 Issue 2 Spring 1966 Article 4 Spring 1966 Rules Are Made to Be William L. Hungate Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation William L. Hungate, Rules Are Made to Be, 31 MO. L. REV. (1966) Available at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr/vol31/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Missouri Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Hungate: Hungate: Rules are Made RULES ARE MADE TO BE WILLIAM L. HUNGATE* To what extent do procedural requirements govern the substantive content of legislation enacted by the United States Congress? Lawyers acquainted with the consequences of suing in tort or as- sumpsit, when their client bit into a tack while eating blueberry pie or chewed a stone in a bowl of beans,1 well realize the homage our courts sometimes pay to procedure. What legal scholar hasn't savored the his- torical dilemma of whether to sue in trespass or trespass on the case? And, if the case is not your own, you can currently enjoy the subtle but significant difference in a judgment depending on whether it was taken as a summary judgment, a default judgment, or a judgment on the pleadings. When our own case or judgment is lost because of some procedural insufficiency, we may deplore those who worship "dry form" to the detri- ment of substantive merits.
    [Show full text]
  • National Tracking Poll #2102136 February 26 - March 01, 2021
    National Tracking Poll #2102136 February 26 - March 01, 2021 Crosstabulation Results Methodology: This poll was conducted between February 26-March 1, 2021 among a national sample of1992 Registered Voters. The interviews were conducted online and the data were weighted to approximate a target sample of Registered Voters based on gender, educational attainment, age, race, and region. Results from the full survey have a margin of error of plus or minus 2 percentage points. Table Index 1 Table P1: Now, generally speaking, would you say that things in the country are going in the right direction, or have they pretty seriously gotten off on the wrong track? .......... 8 2 Table nr2b: Do you approve or disapprove of the job Joe Biden is doing as President? . 12 3 Table nr2bNET: Do you approve or disapprove of the job Joe Biden is doing as President? . 16 4 Table P3: Now, thinking about your vote, what would you say is the top set of issues on your mind when you cast your vote for federal offices such as U.S. Senate or Congress? . 20 5 Table POL1_1: Do you approve or disapprove of how President Biden is handling each of the following? The economy ..................................... 25 6 Table POL1_2: Do you approve or disapprove of how President Biden is handling each of the following? Jobs ......................................... 29 7 Table POL1_3: Do you approve or disapprove of how President Biden is handling each of the following? Health care ..................................... 33 8 Table POL1_4: Do you approve or disapprove of how President Biden is handling each of the following? Immigration ....................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2005 ANNUAL REPORT CONTENTS 6 Economic 10 Studies Global Economy and Development 27 Katrina’S Lessons in Recovery
    QUALITY IMPACT AND INDEPENDENCE ANNUAL REPORT THE 2005 1775 Massachusetts Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20036 www.brookings.edu BROOKINGSINSTITUTION 2005 ANNUAL REPORT CONTENTS 6 Economic 10 Studies Global Economy and Development 27 Katrina’s Lessons in Recovery 39 Brookings Institution Press 14 40 Governance Center for Executive Education Studies 2 About Brookings 4 Chairman’s Message 5 President’s Message 31 Brookings Council 18 36 Honor Roll of Contributors Foreign 42 Financial Summary Policy Studies 44 Trustees 24 Metropolitan Policy Editor: Melissa Skolfield, Vice President for Communications Copyright ©2005 The Brookings Institution Writers: Katie Busch, Shawn Dhar, Anjetta McQueen, Ron Nessen 1775 Massachusetts Avenue, NW 28 Design and Print Production: The Magazine Group, Inc. Washington, DC 20036 Jeffrey Kibler, Virginia Reardon, Brenda Waugh Telephone: 202-797-6000 Support for Production Coordinator: Adrianna Pita Fax: 202-797-6004 Printing: Jarboe Printing www.brookings.edu Cover Photographs: (front cover) William Bradstreet/Folio, Inc., Library of Congress Card Number: 84-641502 Brookings (inside covers) Catherine Karnow/Folio, Inc. Broadcast reporters zoom in for a forum on a new compact for Iraq THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION featuring U.S. Sen. Joseph Biden of Delaware. he Brookings Institution is a pri- vate nonprofit organization devoted to independent research and innovative policy solutions. Celebrating its 90th anniversary in 2006, Brookings analyzes current and emerging issues and produces new ideas that matter—for the nation and the world. ■ For policymakers and the media, Brookings scholars provide the highest-quality research, policy recommendations, and analysis on the full range of public policy issues. ■ Research at the Brookings Institution is conducted to inform the public debate, not advance a political agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Social Welfare Provision at Local Level: a Case Study On
    Argumentum E-ISSN: 2176-9575 [email protected] Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo Brasil Sinem ARIKAN, Elif Social Welfare Provision at Local Level: A Case Study on Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality Argumentum, vol. 8, núm. 1, enero-abril, 2016, pp. 115-125 Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo Vitória, Brasil Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=475555256018 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18315/argumentum.v8i1.11884 ARTIGO Social Welfare Provision at Local Level: A Case Study on Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality Prestação de assistência social a nível local: um estudo de caso no Município de Istambul Elif Sinem ARIKAN1 Abstract: In this article I tried to find traces of a neo-conservative model the Istanbul Metropolitan Municipal- ity in Turkey. Firstly I tried to explain significant collaboration between liberalism and conservatism in the neoliberal context. Subsequently, I tried to evaluate the Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality to see the neo- conservative administration’s effects on local administrations based on market-oriented administration ra- tionale. I tried to explain that the gender discourse was strengthened because of such administration rationale. I tried to evaluate this matter profoundly. I mentioned the Ladies Commission of RP (Welfare Party) and Kadın Koordinasyon Merkezi (Women Coordination Center (WCC)) in the Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality as examples of models of conservative women’s political organizations. Keywords: Neoliberalism.
    [Show full text]