DOCSLIB.ORG

Mangrove Monitor

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mangrove Monitor Mangrove monitor The mangrove monitor,[2] mangrove goanna, or Western Pacific monitor lizard (Varanus indicus) is a member of the Mangrove monitor monitor lizard family with a large distribution from northern Australia and New Guinea to the Moluccas and Solomon Islands. Populations from the Marshall Islands, Caroline Islands, and Mariana Islands formerly classified in V. indicus are now considered to comprised two distinct species.[3] It grows to lengths of 3.5 to 4 ft (1.1 to 1.2 m). Contents Conservation status Names Taxonomy Distribution and habitat Least Concern (IUCN 3.1) Anatomy and morphology CITES Appendix II (CITES) Diet Scientific classification Reproduction Kingdom: Animalia Contact with humans Phylum: Chordata References Class: Reptilia Order: Squamata Names Family: Varanidae It is known as wbl yb in the Kalam language of Papua New Genus: Varanus [4] Guinea. Subgenus: Euprepiosaurus Taxonomy Species: V. indicus Binomial name The mangrove monitor Varanus indicus was first described by the (Daudin, 1802)[1] French herpetologist François Marie Daudin in 1802.[1] Daudin's original holotype of a subadult specimen was collected on Ambon, Indonesia, and has since disappeared from the museum in Paris. Daudin's original name for the species was Tupinambis indicus, an appellation it would carry for 100 years until being renamed as a Varanus.[5] Head of a mangrove monitor, National Museum of Natural History The generic name Varanus is derived from the Arabic word waral (France). [6] (), which translates to English as "monitor." Its specific name, indicus, is Latin for the country of India, but in this instance it relates to Indonesia or the East Indies, where the animal was first described.[5] Due to its large geographic range, V. indicus is considered a cryptic species complex of at least four species: Varanus indicus, Varanus doreanus,Varanus spinulosus, and Varanus jobiensis.[7] More research is being done on possible future species within this complex, not surprisingly, since it has had over 25 different scientific names since it was first described.[5] Distribution and habitat The mangrove monitor's range extends throughout northern Australia, New Guinea, the Solomon Islands, the Marshall Islands, the Caroline Islands, and the Mariana Islands, where it inhabits damp forests near coastal rivers, mangroves, and permanent inland lakes. It also occurs on the Moluccan islands of Morotai, Ternate, Halmahera, Obi, Buru, Ambon, Haruku, and Seram in Indonesia. Within this range of thousands of miles across hundreds of islands are large variations in size, pattern, and scalation.[5] The monitors have also been introduced to Japan since the 1940s.[8] Like the introduction to Japan, some herpetologists believe this animal's dispersal from the East Indies to smaller Pacific islands was facilitated by Polynesians to provide a meat supply. However, other scientists maintain this is not likely, as the monitors would compete with man for food, grow slowly, and yield little meat.[9] Anatomy and morphology The monitor's body is dark green or black in color and covered with golden-yellow spots, with light coloration on the top of its head and a solid, cream-colored belly lacking dark markings.[5] It has a distinct dark purple juvenile tongue and serrated teeth.[5][10] The mangrove monitor attains different sizes in different parts of its range, but seldom if ever exceeds 1.3 m in total length.[5] Australian herpetologist Harold Cogger gives a total length of 100 cm for Australian specimens.[11] The tail is almost twice the length of the body and laterally compressed to aid in swimming. Like the rest of the lizard's body, it is covered with small, oval, keeled scales.[10] This monitor has the ability to increase the size of its mouth by spreading the hyoid apparatus and dropping the lower jaw to eat large prey, a process similar in appearance to that of snakes, although the jaw of the mangrove monitor remains rigid.[12] The mangrove monitor possesses a Jacobson's organ, which it uses to detect prey, sticking its tongue out to gather scents and touching it to the opening of the organ when the tongue is retracted.[10] The mangrove monitor is one of only two species of monitor lizards that possess salt-excreting nasal glands, the other being V. semiremex, which enables them to survive in saltwater conditions and to consume marine prey.[9] The presence of this gland probably enabled the monitors to reach new islands and aid in its dispersal throughout the Pacific.[10] Diet The mangrove monitor is an opportunistic carnivore, feeding on the eggs of reptiles and birds, mollusks, rodents, insects, crabs, smaller lizards, fish, and carrion.[11][13][14] Mangrove monitors are the only monitor capable of catching fish in deep water.[15] In some parts of its range, it is known to eat juvenile crocodiles.[5] Mangrove monitors in the Southern Mariana Islands shifted major prey classes when their regular prey began declining.[8] The monitors were known for eating shrews on Guam,[6] but the introduction of the brown tree snake (Boiga irregularis) led to decreased shrew numbers, prompting the monitors to switch to eating invertebrates and foraging through human garbage.[6][8] Reproduction The species lacks distinct sexual dimorphism, but mature male monitors on Guam have been reported to be three times the mass of mature females.[6] Males fight for females, and in one observation, after mounting the female, the male used his chin to rub the dorsum of the female's head and forequarters.[8] While mounted and oriented head to head, the male and female slowly rotated in a clockwise direction through 360°, with the male remaining superior.[8] Female mangrove monitors lay two to 12 eggs that measure 3.5 to 5 cm in length. The oblong eggs are white, and hatch in about seven to eight months.[16] The first successful captive breeding of this species was at the Philadelphia Zoo in 1993. The Reptilian Zoo in Vlissingen, the Netherlands,[17] was reported to have successfully hatched eggs by a female animal which was not in any contact with a male of the same species. Contact with humans Humans have introduced the mangrove monitor to a number of Pacific Islands since the 1930s.[14][18] They have been present on Ifaluk in the western Caroline Islands since the Second World War.[18] The Japanese introduced the lizards to the Marshall Islands prior to World War II to eliminate rats; the lizards flourished and soon began to raid the local chicken houses.[14] When American troops arrived, the locals asked them for help in getting rid of the mangrove monitors. The US response was to introduce the marine toad (Bufo marinus) which proved toxic to the lizards.[14] As the monitor population dropped, however, the rat population began to rise.[14] The mangrove monitor is hunted in many places for its skin, which is used for leather in making drum heads.[19][20] Although international trade in this species is small, Mertens referred to it as one of the most heavily exploited monitor lizards.[20] In 1980, trade in over 13,000 monitors was declared. However, in many remote places, they are used as a food source and are killed because of their reputation for preying on domestic animals.[10] An ethnic group on Guam eats the monitors as a traditional food, and a business there sells monitors for food.[8] The United States Department of Agriculture’s Animal and Plant Inspection Service announced it will use a combination of two poisons, diphacinone and brodifacoum, to kill off the rodents on Cocos Island (Guam). They will also attempt to lower the mangrove monitor population on Cocos Island by 80%, using several trapping methods proposed by herpetologist Seamus Ehrhard, as the lizard is believed to prey upon the endangered Guam rail (Gallirallus owstoni). Most locals, however, do not see the monitor as an invasive species and a few activists are opposed to the attempt to lower the population there. Mangrove monitors are often kept in zoos and private collections, as they are an active and alert, and generally can be handled if tamed properly.[13] Most specimens defecate on their handlers when stressed.[10] With proper care they can live up to 20 years in captivity.[13] References 1. Daudin, F.M. (1802). Histoire Naturelle, génerale et particulièredes reptiles, ouvrage faisant suite, a l'histoiure naturelle, générale et particulière composée par Leclerc de Buffon, et redigée par C. S. Sonnini (in French). 3. Paris. 2. "Varanus indicus" (https://www.itis.gov/servlet/SingleRpt/SingleRpt?search_topic=TSN&search _value=174116). Integrated Taxonomic Information System. Retrieved 27 August 2008. 3. Weijola, Valter; Vahtera, Varpu; Koch, André; Schmitz, Andreas; Kraus, Fred. "Taxonomy of Micronesian monitors (Reptilia: Squamata: Varanus): endemic status of new species argues for caution in pursuing eradication plans" (https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.2 00092). Royal Society Open Science. 7 (5): 200092. doi:10.1098/rsos.200092 (https://doi.org/1 0.1098%2Frsos.200092). PMC 7277287 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7277 287). PMID 32537217 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32537217). 4. Bulmer, RNH (1975). Kalam Classification Of Reptiles And Fishes (http://www.jps.auckland.ac. nz/document//Volume_84_1975/Volume_84%2C_No._3/Kalam_classification_of_reptiles_and _fishes%2C_by_R._N._H._Bulmer%2C_J._I._Menzies_and_F._Parker%2C_p_267-308/p1). Journal of the Polynesian Society 84(3): 267–308. 5. Sprackland, Robert (March 1997). "Mangrove monitor lizards". Reptiles Magazine: 48–63. 6. Pianka, Eric R.; King, Dennis; King, Ruth Allen (2004). Varanoid Lizards of the World. Indiana University Press. p. 588. ISBN 0-253-34366-6. 7. "Recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee" (https://web.archive.org/web/200805182 10428/http://www.cites.org/eng/notif/1997/964.shtml).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dietary Behavior of the Mangrove Monitor Lizard (Varanus Indicus)
    DIETARY BEHAVIOR OF THE MANGROVE MONITOR LIZARD (VARANUS INDICUS) ON COCOS ISLAND, GUAM, AND STRATEGIES FOR VARANUS INDICUS ERADICATION A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI’I AT HILO IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN TROPICAL CONSERVATION BIOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE MAY 2016 By Seamus P. Ehrhard Thesis Committee: William Mautz, Chairperson Donald Price Patrick Hart Acknowledgements I would like to thank Guam’s Department of Agriculture, the Division of Aquatic and Wildlife Resources, and wildlife biologist, Diane Vice, for financial assistance, research materials, and for offering me additional staffing, which greatly aided my fieldwork on Guam. Additionally, I would like to thank Dr. William Mautz for his consistent help and effort, which exceeded all expectations of an advisor, and without which I surely would have not completed my research or been inspired to follow my passion of herpetology to the near ends of the earth. 2 Abstract The mangrove monitor lizard (Varanus indicus), a large invasive predator, can be found on all areas of the 38.6 ha Cocos Island at an estimated density, in October 2011, of 6 V. Indicus per hectare on the island. Plans for the release of the endangered Guam rail (Gallirallus owstoni) on Cocos Island required the culling of V. Indicus, because the lizards are known to consume birds and bird eggs. Cocos Island has 7 different habitats; resort/horticulture, Casuarina forest, mixed strand forest, Pemphis scrub, Scaevola scrub, sand/open area, and wetlands. I removed as many V. Indicus as possible from the three principal habitats; Casuarina forest, mixed scrub forest, and a garbage dump (resort/horticulture) using six different trapping methods.
    [Show full text]
  • Spectral Analysis Reveals Limited Potential for Enhanced- Wavelength Detection of Invasive Snakes
    56 ARTICLES front of a house supports that this species is able to breed in dis- GOSNER, K. L. 1960. A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and turbed areas. More data on recruitment success and long-term larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica 16:183–190. population trends are necessary. JUNGFER, K. 1996. Reproduction and parental care of the coronated treefrog, Anotheca spinosa (Steindachner, 1864) (Anura: Hylidae). Acknowledgments.—We thank Ernest Carman and Ernesto Car- Herpetologica 52:25–32. OBINSON Anotheca coronata man Jr. for their hospitality and permission to access and conduct R , D. C. 1961. The identity of the tadpole of fieldwork on their farm. We thank Gilbert Barrantes, James. V. Rem- (Stejneger). Copeia 1961:495. sen, Carlos Guarnizo, Sabrina Amador, and Michael J. Ryan for their santos-BaRReRa, G.,o. FLoRes-ViLLeLa, F. soLís, R. iBáñez, J. saVaGe, G. HAVES AND UBICKI Anotheca spinosa In valuable comments and revision of the manuscript. C , B. K . 2004. IUCN 2012. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2012.1. <www.iucnredlist. org>. Downloaded on 03 July 2012. LITERATURE CITED SAVAGE, J. M. 2002. The Amphibians and Reptiles of Costa Rica: A Her- petofauna Between Two Continents, Between Two Seas. Univer- DUELLMAN, W. E. 2001. The Hylid Frogs of Middle America, 2 vols, re- sity of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois. 934 pp. vised. SSAR Contributions to Herpetology, Ithaca, New York. 1159 STEINDACHNER, F. 1864. Batrachologische Mittheilungen. Verhandlun- pp. + 92 plates. gen des Zoologisch-Botanischen Vereins in Wien. 14:239–288. CHARIF, R. A., C. W. CLARK, AND K. M.
    [Show full text]
  • Revised Recovery Plan for the Sihek Or Guam Micronesian Kingfisher (Halcyon Cinnamomina Cinnamomina)
    DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate actions which the best available science indicates are required to recover and protect listed species. Plans are published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and sometimes prepared with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, State agencies, and others. Recovery teams serve as independent advisors to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Recovery plans are reviewed by the public and submitted to additional peer review before they are approved and adopted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Nothing in this plan should be construed as a commitment or requirement that any Federal agency obligate or pay funds in contravention of the Anti-Deficiency Act, 31 USC 1341, or any other law or regulation. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views nor the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Recovery plans represent the official position of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service only after they have been signed as approved by the Regional Director or Director. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery actions. Please check for updates or revisions at the website addresses provided below before using this plan. Literature citation of this document should read as follows: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Challenges Surrounding Reintroduction Biology
    The Challenges Surrounding Reintroduction Biology BY KATIE MORELL 22 www.aza.org | January 2016 January 2016 | www.aza.org 23 Listed as extinct in the wild by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), the bird has yet to be reintroduced to its native land, so a satellite home for the species has been created on the neighboring Pacific island of Rota— the place where Newland felt his faith in reintroduction falter, if just for a minute. “On my first trip to Rota, I remember stepping off the plane and seeing a rail dead on the ground at the airport,” he said. “Someone had run over it with their car.” The process of reintroducing a species into the wild can be tricky at best. There are hundreds of factors that go into the decision—environmental, political and © Sedgwick County Zoo, Yang Zhao Yang Zoo, © Sedgwick County sociological. When it works, the results are exhilarating for the public and environmentalists. That is what happened in the 1980s when biologists were alerted to the plight of the California condor, pushed to near extinction by a pesticide called DDT. By 1982, there were only 23 condors left; five years later, a robust breeding and reintroduction program was initiated to save the species. The program worked, condors were released, DDT was outlawed and, according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), as of 2008 there were t was a few years ago when Scott more condors flying in the wild than in Newland felt his heart drop to managed care. his feet.
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSACTIONS of the Fifty-Seventh North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference
    TRANSACTIONS of the Fifty-seventh North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference Conference theme— Crossroads of Conservation: 500 Years After Columbus Marc/, 27-Apr;V 7. 7992 Radisson Plaza Hotel Charlotte and Charlotte Convention Center Charlotte, North Carolina Edited by Richard E. McCabe i w Published by the Wildlife Management Institute, Washington, DC, 1992 Johnson, M. L. and M, S. Gaines. 1988. Demography of the western harvest mouse, Reithrodon- Managing Genetic Diversity in Captive Breeding tomys megalotis, in eastern Kansas. Oecologia 75:405-411. Kareiva, P. and M, Anderson. 1988. Spatial aspects of .species interactions'. The wedding of models and Reproduction Programs and experiments. In A. Hasting, ed., Community Ecology. Springer-Verlag. New York, NY. Lande, R. 1988. Genetics and demography in biological conservation. Science 241; 1,455-1,460. Levins, R. A. 1980. Extinction. Am. Mathematical Soc. 2:77-107... Katherine Rails and Jonathan D. Ballon Lovejoy, T. B. 1985. Forest fragmentation in the Amazon: A case study. Pages 243-252 in H. Department of Zoological Research Messel, ed., The Study of Populations. Pergamon Press, Sydney, Australia. National Zoological Park Lovejoy, T. E., J. M. Rankin, R. O. Bierregaard, K. S. Brown, L. H. Emmons, and M. E. Van Smithsonian Institution der Voort. 1984. Ecosystem decay of Amazon Forest fragments. Pages 295-325 in M. H. Washington, D.C. Nitecki, ed., Extinctions. Univ. Chicago Press. Chicago, IL. Lovejoy, T. E., R. O. Bierregaard, Jr., A. B. Rylands, J. R. Malcolm, C. E. Quintela, L. H. Harper, K. S. Brown, Jr., A. H. Powell, G. V. N. Powell, H. 0, R.
    [Show full text]
  • Varanus Macraei
    BIAWAK Journal of Varanid Biology and Husbandry Volume 13 Number 2 ISSN: 1936-296X On the Cover: Varanus macraei The Blue tree monitors, Varanus mac- raei depicted on the cover and inset of this issue were hatched on 14 No- vember 2019 at Bristol Zoo Gardens (BZG) and are the first of their spe- cies to hatch at a UK zoological in- stitution. Two live offspring from an original clutch of four eggs hatched after 151 days of incubation at a tem- perature of 30.5 °C. The juveniles will remain on dis- play at BZG until they are eventually transferred to other accredited Euro- pean Association of Zoos & Aquari- ums (EAZA) institutions as part of the zoo breeding programme. Text and photographs by Adam Davis. BIAWAK Journal of Varanid Biology and Husbandry Editor Editorial Review ROBERT W. MENDYK BERND EIDENMÜLLER Department of Herpetology Frankfurt, DE Smithsonian National Zoological Park [email protected] 3001 Connecticut Avenue NW Washington, DC 20008, US RUston W. Hartdegen [email protected] Department of Herpetology Dallas Zoo, US Department of Herpetology [email protected] Audubon Zoo 6500 Magazine Street TIM JESSOP New Orleans, LA 70118, US Department of Zoology [email protected] University of Melbourne, AU [email protected] Associate Editors DAVID S. KIRSHNER Sydney Zoo, AU DANIEL BENNETT [email protected] PO Box 42793 Larnaca 6503, CY JEFFREY M. LEMM [email protected] San Diego Zoo Institute for Conservation Research Zoological Society of San Diego, US MICHAEL Cota [email protected] Natural History Museum National Science Museum, Thailand LAURENCE PAUL Technopolis, Khlong 5, Khlong Luang San Antonio, TX, US Pathum Thani 12120, TH [email protected] [email protected] SAMUEL S.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Blue-Tailed Monitor Lizard (Reptilia, Squamata, Varanus) of the Varanus Indicus Group from Mussau Island, Papua New Guinea Zookeys, 2016; 2016(568):129-154
    PUBLISHED VERSION Valter Weijola, Stephen C. Donnellan, Christer Lindqvist A new blue-tailed Monitor lizard (Reptilia, Squamata, Varanus) of the Varanus indicus group from Mussau Island, Papua New Guinea ZooKeys, 2016; 2016(568):129-154 Copyright Valter Weijola et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Originally published at: http://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.568.6872 PERMISSIONS http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 27 June 2017 http://hdl.handle.net/2440/104534 A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 568: 129–154A (2016) new blue-tailed Monitor lizard (Reptilia, Squamata, Varanus)... 129 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.568.6872 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research A new blue-tailed Monitor lizard (Reptilia, Squamata, Varanus) of the Varanus indicus group from Mussau Island, Papua New Guinea Valter Weijola1, Stephen C. Donnellan2, Christer Lindqvist3 1 Zoological Museum, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland (VW) 2 South Australian Museum, North Terrace, Adelaide, 5000 and School of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5005, Australia (SCD) 3 Cell Biology, Åbo Akademi University, 20520 Turku, Finland (CL) Corresponding author: Valter Weijola ([email protected]) Academic editor: A. Bauer | Received 17 October 2015 | Accepted 24 January 2016 | Published 23 February 2016 http://zoobank.org/5A7E7E19-A002-48C6-B453-DF39338B77D4 Citation: Weijola V, Donnellan SC, Lindqvist C (2016) A new blue-tailed Monitor lizard (Reptilia, Squamata, Varanus) of the Varanus indicus group from Mussau Island, Papua New Guinea.
    [Show full text]
  • THE KEI ISLANDS MONITOR LIZARD (SQUAMATA: VARANIDAE: Varanus: Euprepiosaurus) AS a DISTINCT MORPHOLOGICAL, TAXONOMIC, and CONSERVATION UNIT
    Russian Journal of Herpetology Vol. 26, No. 5, 2019, pp. 272 – 280 DOI: 10.30906/1026-2296-2019-26-5-272-280 THE KEI ISLANDS MONITOR LIZARD (SQUAMATA: VARANIDAE: Varanus: Euprepiosaurus) AS A DISTINCT MORPHOLOGICAL, TAXONOMIC, AND CONSERVATION UNIT Wolfgang Böhme,1* Hans J. Jacobs,2 Thore Koppetsch,1 and Andreas Schmitz3 Submitted Submitted May 27, 2019. We describe a new species of the Varanus indicus group (subgenus Euprepiosaurus) from the Kei Islands, Indone- sia, which differs from its close relative V. indicus by a light tongue, a conspicuous color pattern composed of dis- tinct yellowish ocelli on a blackish ground color and by some scalation characters. From its more distantly related, but morphologically similar relative V. finschi it differs by its midbody scale count and by some peculiarities of its scale microstructure. The new taxon, endemic to the Kei Islands, is also discussed in the light of conservation problems for many Indonesian island endemics. Keywords: Varanus; new species; Kei Islands; Maluku Province; Indonesia; conservation. INTRODUCTION updated by Koch et al. (2010) who added again four addi- tional species that had been described in the mean-time, The Mangrove Monitor Lizard, Varanus indicus and removed one (V. spinulosus) from the indicus group, (Daudin, 1803), type species of the subgenus Euprepio- since it turned out not even to belong to the subgenus saurus Fitzinger, 1843, has been dismantled as a collec- Euprepiosaurus (see Böhme and Ziegler, 2007, Buck- tive species and found to be composed of meanwhile no litsch et al., 2016). After that update, two further new less than 15 different, partly allopatric taxa which are species of this group have been described (Weijola, 2016, commonly considered as species.
    [Show full text]
  • Guam Rail Conservation: a Milestone 30 Years in the Making by Kurt Hundgen, Director of Animal Collections
    CONSERVATION & RESEARCH UPDATES FROM THE NATIONAL AVIARY SPRING 2021 Guam Rail Conservation: A Milestone 30 Years in the Making by Kurt Hundgen, Director of Animal Collections t the end of 2019 the conservation Working together through the Guam best of all, recent sightings of unbanded world celebrated a momentous Rail Species Survival Plan® (SSP), some rails there confirm that the species has achievement:A Guam Rail, once ‘Extinct twenty zoos strategized ways to ensure the already successfully reproduced in the in the Wild,’ was elevated to ‘Critically genetic diversity and health of this small wild for the first time in almost 40 years. Endangered’ status thanks to the recent population of Guam Rails in human care. The international collaboration that successful reintroduction of the species Their goal was to increase the size of the made the success of the Guam Rail to the wild. This conservation milestone zoo population and eventually introduce reintroduction possible likely will go is more than thirty years in the making— the species onto islands near Guam that down in conservation history. Behind the hoped-for result of intensive remained free of Brown Tree Snakes. every ko’ko’ once again living in the collaboration among multiple zoos and Guam wildlife officials have slowly wild is the very successful collaboration government agencies separated by oceans returned Guam Rails to the wild on the among many organizations and hundreds and continents. It is an extremely rare small neighboring islands of Cocos and of dedicated conservationists. conservation success story, shared by Rota. Reintroduction programs are most And we hope that there will be only one other bird: the iconic successful when local governments and California Condor.
    [Show full text]
  • I OFFICE of the LEGISLATIVE SECRETARY ( the Honorable Joanne M
    CARL T.C. GUTIERREZ GOVERNOR OF GUAM I JUL 1 1 ZNfl I OFFICE OF THE LEGISLATIVE SECRETARY ( The Honorable Joanne M. S. Brown Legislative Secretary I Mina'Bente Singko na Liheslaturan Twenty-Fifth Guam Legislature Suite 200 130 Aspinal Street ~a~iltf&Guam 96910 Dear Legislative Secretary Brown: Enclosed please find Substitute Bill No. 427 (COR), "AN ACT TO REPEAL AND REENACT $1023 OF CHAPTER 10 OF TITLE 1 OF THE GUAM CODE ANNOTATED, RELATIVE TO THE DESIGNATION OF THE OFFICIAL BIRD OF GUAM, which was signed into law Public Law No. 25-155. This legislation changes the officid bird of Guam from the Totot, the Mariana Fruit Dove (Ptilinoppus roseicapilla), to the Ko'ko, the Guam Rail (Gallirallus owstoni). The idea for this change was generated by the Guam Department of Agriculture, which has been involved for a number of years in the effort to preserve and protect the Ko'ko. In fact, the Department of Agriculture had a number of village meetings to determine community feeling, and then their draft legislation was forwarded to the Legislature by the Administration. The Ko'ko has already become something of a symbol for Guam, and was used as a mascot during the South Pacific Games held here last year. I only to Guam, while the Totot is indigenous not only to Guam but also This fact, along with the concentrated local effort to preserve the Ko'ko that effort is now achieving, make it especially appropriate to have official bird of Guam. A portion of Andersen Air Force Base is set free" zone to provide undisturbed habitat to the Ko'ko, and birds and reproducing in the area The Department of Agriculture is habitat area.
    [Show full text]
  • Varanus Indicus and Its Presence on the Mariana Islands: Natural Geographic Distribution Vs
    Biawak. 2008. 2(1): 18-27 © 2008 by International Varanid Interest Group Varanus indicus and its Presence on the Mariana Islands: Natural Geographic Distribution vs. Introduction MICHAEL COTA Thailand Natural History Museum, National Science Museum Technopolis, Khlong 5, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani 12120, TH [email protected] Introduction The presence of Varanus indicus on the Mariana Islands has been most often regarded as a recent introduction and not a part of its natural geographic distribution. The introduction of reptile species, particularly V. indicus by the Germans before World War I and later by the Japanese on many Pacifi c islands, has been speculated and documented respectively (Uchida, 1969); however, there is evidence to suggest that its presence in the Mariana Islands, specifi cally on Guam, is from natural dispersal rather than a product of human introduction. It is suggested here that introduction of V. indicus in Micronesia, to include the Marianas Islands and Guam, pre-dates European presence in the region (Brown, 1956; Lever, 2003) and that it was introduced by Polynesian colonists. Lever (2003), cites both Rodda & Fritts (1992b), which does not shed light on the subject, and McCoid (1993), which was speculation on what he wrote rather than what he actually stated in writing. However, strong linguistic evidence exists that V. indicus did exist before there was a European presence in the region; there is a Chamorro (native language of the people of the Marianas) word for monitor lizard, which is ‘Hilitai’. This suggests that V. indicus was either present before the Chamorros arrived or they brought it with them.
    [Show full text]
  • Varanus Indicus Global Invasive Species Database (GISD)
    FULL ACCOUNT FOR: Varanus indicus Varanus indicus System: Terrestrial Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Animalia Chordata Reptilia Squamata Varanidae Common name erebachi (Marovo), Pazifikwaran (German), regu (Roviana), kalabeck monitor (English), varan des indes (French), Indian monitor (English), Pacific monitor (English), Indian monitor lizard (English), mangrove monitor (English), sosi (Touo), ambon lizard (English), flower lizard (English), stillahavsvaran (Swedish), varano de manglar (Spanish), George's island monitor (English), varan des mangroves (French) Synonym Monitor chlorostigma Monitor douarrha Monitor kalabeck Tupinambis indicus Varanus guttatus Varanus tsukamotoi Monitor doreanus Monitor indicus Varanus chlorostigma Varanus indicus indicus Varanus leucostigma Varanus indicus kalabecki Varanus indicus spinulosis Similar species Varanus doreanus, Varanus indicus spinulosus Summary Varanus indicus (mangrove monitor) is a terrestrial-arboreal monitor lizard that has been introduced to several locations for its meat, skin or as a biological control agent. It has created a nuisance on many islands preying on domesticated chickens and scavenging the eggs of endangered sea turtles. Bufo marinus (cane toad) was introduced to control mangrove monitor populations in several locations, but this has led to devastating consequences. In many places both of these species are now serious pests, with little potential for successful control. view this species on IUCN Red List Global Invasive Species Database (GISD) 2021. Species profile Varanus indicus. Pag. 1 Available from: http://www.iucngisd.org/gisd/species.php?sc=1065 [Accessed 27 September 2021] FULL ACCOUNT FOR: Varanus indicus Species Description Varanus indicus (mangrove monitor) is darkly coloured with small yellow spots. It has a long, narrow head attached to a long neck. It has four strong legs, each with five sharp claws.
    [Show full text]