Tonal Functions and Active Synthesis: Hugo Riemann, German Psychology, and Kantian Epistemology Author(s): Trevor Pearce Source: Intégral, Vol. 22 (2008), pp. 81-116 Published by: Intégral Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20696499 Accessed: 16-06-2016 18:53 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact
[email protected]. Intégral is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Intégral This content downloaded from 152.15.112.58 on Thu, 16 Jun 2016 18:53:12 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms !"#$%&'(#)*+"#,&$#-&.)*+/0&12#*30,+,4&5(6"&7+08$##9& :0;8$#&<,2)3"%"629&$#-&=$#*+$#&>?+,*08"%"62& & !;0/";&<0$;)0& One could in fact set the whole first part of the Transcendental Doctrine of Elements of the Critique of Pure Reason to music Carl Stumpf, Tone Psychology (13, viii) @#*;"-()*+"#& Music theorists often analyFe a piece of music without reflectinG on the philosophical basis of their theoretical approach: This lack of refleJivity creates epistemic blind spots, which can conceal important methodoloGical assumptions: The most common way to promote epistemoloGical reflection is to analyFe eJistinG