DOCSLIB.ORG

Pursuant to 1982 Session Laws, Ch 511

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pursuant to 1982 Session Laws, Ch 511 Pursuant to 1982 Session Laws, ch 511, Section 8, subd 3 This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp I (Funding for document digitization was provided, in part, by a grant from the Minnesota Historical & Cultural Heritage Program.) STATE FOREST BOUNDARY PLAN Prepared Pursuant to the Forest Resource Act of 1982 •• 1982 Minnesota Laws, 511~ Section 8 I ·~ By the I State Forest Task Force •• I December 31 1983 11 I I Minnesota of Natural Resources Division of I St. Paul, Minnesota I I I Table of Contents I I Introduction ..................... ·................... • ............ I Study Procedures and Findings: ..•••••••••••••••••.....••••••••••••• 2 I Criteria and Procedure for Establishing State Forest Boundaries ............................................ ·.... 4 I Criteria ..................................................... 4 Procedure ...................................................· .. 5 I Proposed Boundary Changes ••••..••••••••••••••••..•••••.••••••••••• 8 Fond du Lac State Forest 8 I Koochiching State Forest 9 Richard J. Dorer Memorial Hardwood State Forest ••.•••••••••••• 9 I Lost River State Forest .•.•••••••.••••••••••••••.••••••••••••• 9 I References ..•••••....•••••••.•.••••••..•••••.•••.•.•• ~ • • . • . • • • • • • 11 I Appendices A. Excerpts from the Forest Resource Management Act of 1982 (1982 Minn. Laws, Chapter 5 ll) • • . • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • 1 2 I B. State Forest Boundary Task Force Members •••••••••••••••••• 14 C. Excerpts from "A History of Forestry in Minnesota" I (Bachman, 1965) . 1 5 D. Proposed Legislation to Change Selected State I Forest ·Boundaries •••••••••••.••••••••••••••••••• ~ • • • • • • • • • i 9 I I I I I I I INTRODUCTION Recognizing the importance of the state 1 s forest resources, the 1899 II legislature authorized the establishment of public forest reserves to be managed for forestry purposes (1899 Minn. Laws, Chapter 214). The Pillsbury, I Burntsideu and Itasca were among the first forest reserves to be established. The title forest reserve was changed to state forest in 1913. A constitutional amendment passed in 1914 allowed state trust fund lands to be II set aside as state forests. The legislature has clearly stated that state forests are to be managed to provide several forest resources on a sustained I basis. I In 1982 the legislature further defined the role of state forests by adopting a forest resource management policy and clearly defining the ·terms "forest resources,n umultiple use" and 11 sustained yield" (see Appendix A). • The Forest Resource Management Act of 1982 also called for an assessment of I state forest boundaries to determine if lands currently in state forests were suited for long-term forest management or if there were additional lands that might be given state forest status. Section 8 of the Forest Resource • Management Act of 1982 (1982 Minne Laws, Chapter 511) directed the Commissioner of Natural Resources to propose a realignment of the boundaries of state forests including consolidation or creation of state forests and • adjustments of boundaries of existing state forests, based on the long-term suitability of lands for use and management for forestry purposes. The State • Forest Boundary Task Force was appointed to study and recommend changes in • state forest boundaries (see Appendix B) I The Forest Resource Management Act further required the task force to consider the results of the Land Suitability Study in proposing boundary changes • Since the Land Suitability Study was not scheduled to be completed in time to allow the task force to meet its December 1983.report deadline, it was decided • that the task force should not attempt a comprehensive reevaluation of state I forest boundaries. Instead the task force was charged with developing a process and criteria to be used in identifying lands suitable for state forest I purposes The Land Suitability results and the task force's recommended I I process will be used to recommend changes in state forest boundaries when the I unit management plans required by the Forest Resource Management Act are prepared. In addition it ·was decided that the task force report should I propose a limited number of obvious boundary changes that had been previously suggested. I I STUDY PROCEDURES AND FINDINGS The task force reviewed historic records to determine the reasons why existing I state forests were established and the process used in establishing their boundaries. The objective was to develop a list of characteristics common to I all state forests. I The task force found that the reasons for establishing state forests varied considerably as the state forest system e.volved over the past eighty years I (see Appendix C). The earliest forest reserves were established during the conservation era around the turn of the century. In the late 1920 's and .early 1930's state forests were established on consolidated conservation lands that I the state acquired in return for assuming the counties' debts relating to ditching projects. In the 1930's forests were established to qualify for I public works projects. Other state forests were established to commemorate persons or events (e.g., George Washington, D.A.R., Golden Anniversary) or to I promote wise land use. Currently, there are 3 million acres of state lands in Minnesota's 55 state forests; they range in size from the 66 acre Lake I Isabella State Forest to the 641,000 acre Pine Island State Forest. Another 6,500 acres are designated as administrative and scattered state forest lands. About 1.5 million acres managed by the Department for forestry purposes remain I outside state forest boundaries. I There were no enduring criteria as to the minimum or maximum size of state forests, the minimum percentage of state land within the boundary, or the relationship between state forest boundaries and Division of Forestry administrative boundaries. The task force found that state forests could be ~ . I separated into the following classes based on ownership patterns: I I I I I L State forests comprised of large, contiguous blocks of state land (e.g., Beltrami Pine Island). I 2. State forests comprised of tracts of state land intermingled with other I public or industrial lands (e.g., Bear Island, Cloquet Valley). 3. ·State forests comprised of scattered tracts of state land in areas of primarily land (e.g. , Birch Lakes, ·Richard J. Dorer Memorial Hardwood) While this classification was useful for descriptive purposes, it. did not • assist in the long-term suitability of the land for fore st I purposes. Each type of forest presented opportunities for multiple-use I management In the end the valid distinction between the different types of state I forests was that between the 55 state forests and those lands designated as Administrative and Scattered State Forest lands. The former were designed to I be recognizable management units while the latter is used to provide state forest status and protection to smaller forest tracts and administrative I sitese Failing to find any existing criteria that could be used to determine .if a I given of land should be in a state forest, the task force developed a draft list of criteria for state forests. These guidelines were presented and at in each of the Division of Forestry's administrative • arease The revised list of criteria are presented in the next section of this and should be viewed as general guidelines to be applied during the • unit forest resource planning process. I The task force then turned its attention to developing measurements of "long-term suitability for forestry purposes" in cooperation with the Land Suitability staff. Finally a procedure for applying the suitability • £actors the unit planning process was proposed. I• I 3 I CRITERIA AND PROCEDURE FOR ESTABLISHING STATE FOREST BOUNDARIES Criteria I The following criteria apply to all individual, named state forests: I l. A state forest must be capable of being managed for the production of two ~ / or more forest resources. This is to fulfill the requirement to manage state forest lands under multiple use principles (M.S. 89.002 - Subd. 1). I 2. The boundary of an individual state forest with its own name (as opposed to administrative and scattered parcels) should lie within one of the I Department of Natural Resources Forestry .Division's administrative areas. Presently there are a number of state forests where management I responsibilities are shared by two or more administrative areas making it difficult to coordinate management activities on a state forest basis. I Dividing these state forests along area administrative boundaries would improve management efficiency. I 3.. All "forest lands under the au~hority of the commissioner" (M.S. 89.001 - Subd. 13) may be considered for state forest status. I 4. Wherever possible, state forest boundaries should not overlap the I boundaries of other statutory authorized DNR management units. This would help the public to recognize the differences between · the various I management units and their purposes. It would also clarify which rules apply to the management units and aid in their enforcement. I 5. All state forest lands should be accessible to the public over adjacent public lands, water, or roads or by legal access that has been acquired. I 6. At a minimum, state land ownership within the boundary o.f a state forest I with its own name should be 25,000 to 50,000 acres of commercial forest land. The actual minimum will be determined during the unit forest resource planning process at a level that will provide for the establishment of a regulated forest to produce sustained timber yields. I I 4 I I 7. Wherever possible, a state forest, with its own name, should be I recognizable to the public as a distinct management unit. Signs or maps I should be used to promote public recognition. 8. All state forest acquisition units identified in land acquisition plans I approved by the Legislative Commission on Minnesota Resources shall be in state forest status.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kettle River, Minnesota
    Kettle River, Minnesota 1. The region surrounding the river: a. The Kettle River is located in east-central Minnesota. The river has its headwaters in Carlton County and flows generally north-south, passing through Pine County and into the St. Croix River. The basin has a long history of faults and glacial activity. The bedrock formations are of pre-Cambrian metamorphic and volcanic rock. This layer is covered by Cambrian sandstone and unconsolidated glacial till. Outcroppings of sandstone and pre-Cambrian lava are frequent. The area is ragged and rolling with dramatic local relief. The area has gone through a dramatic ecological change since the logging days when the white pine was the dominant vegetation. Today the region has a varied pattern of red pine, spruce, white pine, white birch maple, oak, aspen, and basswood. Major transportation lines in the area include Interstate 35 running north-south through the basin and Minnesota 23 running northeast- southwest through the basin. Minnesota 48 crosses the river east-west just east of Hinckley, Minnesota, and Minnesota Route 65 runs north-south about 25 miles west of the river. Land use in the basin is limited to agriculture and timber production. The Mhmeapolis-St. Paul area to the south supports heavy industry and manufacturing. b. Population within a 50-mile radius was estimated at 150, 700 in 1970. The Duluth, Minnesota/Superior, Wisconsin, metropolitan area lies just outside the 50-mile radius and had an additional 132, 800 persons in 1970. c. Numerous state forests are found in this part of Minnesota. They are Chengwatona State Forest, DAR State Forest, General C.
    [Show full text]
  • Fond Du Lac State Forest Lost Lake
    Prairie Lake Fond du Lac State Forest Lost Lake Hockey 0 1 2 3 Lake Rd. Branden Drive Scale in Miles Pine Brook Arrowhead 73 Bog Thirty-Six Lake Lake Fond Heikkila ST. LOUIS CO. Lake CARLTON CO. Berthiume Heikkila Hardwood 125 Lake Rd. Stoney Hasty du 224 Road Road Dead Fish Lake 338 Brook Lac Lac Lake Ditch Bank Forest Road Rogers Gravel Lake Pit Road Road 7 Spirit Indian Brook Cross Miller Lake Rogers Lake Lake Lake Stoney 120 Road Reservation 73 Spruce Lake 120 Rice Portage Lake Krogh Rd. 122 Sandell WMA Upper 1023 Island Lake Cromwell Homstad Rd. 210 Jaskari Dahlman Rd. 210 Lake Perch LakeRoad 73 277 Moorhead 210 Lower Island Lake Bang Lake Legend Spring Mervin Lake Parking Lake Corona Wildlife Lake Torchlight Management Gate Little Lake Rd. Kettle Lake North Area Kettle Fire Tower Lake Shelter Carry-in Access State Forest Roads (open to all motor vehicles unless posted closed) Minimum Maintenance Forest Roads (open to all motor vehicles Kettle unless posted closed - highway Kettle Lake Wildlife vehicles travel at your own risk) Lake Management Area 142 ATV/OHM (open to OHMs, Class 1 and 2 ATVs) ATV/OHM (open to OHMs and Class 1 ATVs only) Park Lake Hunter Walking Trails Is It Trespassing? Snowmobile On private land, the simple and best answer is, Ask First! Signs are posted by the landowners, and they will state, No Trespassing, or similar words in Ski Trails 172 two-inch letters and the signature or name and telephone number of the landowner, lessee, or 143 manager.
    [Show full text]
  • Little Fork River, Minnesota 1. the Area
    Little Fork River , Minnesota 1. The area surrounding the river: a. The Little Fork watershed is located in Itasca, St. Louis, and Koochichinz Counties, Minnesota. It rises in a rather flat region in St. Louis County and follows a meandering course to the northwest through Koochiching County to its junction with the Rainy River about 19 miles below Little Fork, Minnesota. The area is a hummocky rolling surface made up of morainic deposits and glacial drift laid over a bedrock composed largely of granitic, volcanic, and metamorphic rocks. The upper basin is covered with dense cedar forests with some trees up to three feet in diameter. Needles form a thick layer over the ground with ferns turning the forest floor into a green carpet. In the lower basin the forest changes to hardwoods with elm predominating. Dense brush covers the forest floor. Farming is the major land use other than timber production in the area of Minnesota, but terrain limits areas where farming is practical. Transportation routes in this area are good due to its proximity to International Falls, Minnesota, a major border crossing into Canada. U. S. 53 runs north-south to International Falls about 25 miles east of the basin. U. S. 71 runs northeast-southwest and crosses the river at. Little Fork, Minnesota, and follows the U. S. /Canadian border to International Falls. Minnesota Route 217 connects these two major north-south routes in an east-west direction from Little Fork, Minnesota. Minnesota Route 65 follows the river southward from Little Fork, Minnesota. b. Population within a 50-mile radius was estimated at 173, 000 in.
    [Show full text]
  • East Rat Root River Peatland SNA Koochiching County
    East Rat Root River Peatland SNA Koochiching County N48 31.039 N48 31.026, W93 10.998 W93 11.813 N48 30.921, W93 11.000 N48 30.918 W93 10.343 N48 30.822 W93 11.819 N48 30.807 Koochiching State Forest W93 10.341 N48 30.820 W93 11.649 N48 30.572 trail W93 10.020 N48 30.569 W93 9.704 N48 30.400 N48 30.388 W93 12.312 W93 11.657 N48 30.361 N48 30.359 W93 10.033 W93 9.707 N48 30.142 W93 10.039 Voyageurs National Park N48 29.951 W93 9.693 N48 29.951 W93 8.390 N48 29.755 W93 12.329 winter trail N48 29.541 W93 12.662 N48 29.438 W93 12.052 unimproved ro ad N48 29.516 N48 29.518 N48 29.301 W93 9.371 W93 9.044 W93 12.401 Parking trail N48 29.298 W93 13.823 N48 29.297 W93 12.664 N48 29.302 N48 29.301 N48 29.298 N48 29.300 W93 11.460 W93 10.946 W93 10.031 W93 9.698 N48 29.301 W93 12.337 N48 29.303 N48 29.109 W93 12.058 W93 10.501 Arrowhead StateN48 Trail 28.860 N48 28.864 W93 12.327 W93 10.673 © 2017 MinnesotaSeasons.com. All rights reserved. Based on Minnesota DNR data dated 10/27/2017 East Rat Root River Peatland SNA Koochiching County N48 31.039 N48 31.026, W93 10.998 W93 11.813 N48 30.921, W93 11.000 N48 30.918 W93 10.343 N48 30.822 W93 11.819 N48 30.807 Koochiching State Forest W93 10.341 N48 30.820 W93 11.649 N48 30.572 trail W93 10.020 N48 30.569 W93 9.704 N48 30.400 N48 30.388 W93 12.312 W93 11.657 N48 30.361 N48 30.359 W93 10.033 W93 9.707 N48 30.142 W93 10.039 Voyageurs National Park N48 29.951 W93 9.693 N48 29.951 W93 8.390 N48 29.755 W93 12.329 winter trail N48 29.541 W93 12.662 N48 29.438 W93 12.052 unimproved ro ad N48 29.516 N48 29.518 N48 29.301 W93 9.371 W93 9.044 W93 12.401 Parking trail N48 29.298 W93 13.823 N48 29.297 W93 12.664 N48 29.302 N48 29.301 N48 29.298 N48 29.300 W93 11.460 W93 10.946 W93 10.031 W93 9.698 N48 29.301 W93 12.337 N48 29.303 N48 29.109 W93 12.058 W93 10.501 Arrowhead StateN48 Trail 28.860 N48 28.864 W93 12.327 W93 10.673 © 2017 MinnesotaSeasons.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Koochiching State Forest
    Grassy Narrows Grassy Island Grindstone Tilson Bay 0.2 mi. Frank Island Bay Bald Rock Rainy Lake W Point Tilson Bay W 0.3 mi. Rainy Lake 0.3 mi. Neil Point 0.3 mi. Little American 0.2 mi. W 11 Island U. S. F. S. W 6.5 mi. to International Falls TILSON BAY Frank Bay X HIKING TRAIL Frank Bay X W X 11 W W X DETAIL 11 11 1.3 k. Krause Bay Tilson Creek 0.7 k. X X Island View Dove Point Black Bay Ski and Green Trail 461 Dove Hiking Trails X Island 0.3 k. 96 W Sha Sha X Voyageurs Point 0.3 k. 0.1 k. X X 0.9 k. Steeprock Island Voyageurs X 0.1 k. Tilson National Creek X X X 2.3 k. Blue Trail East Voyageurs Orange Trail X Trail 1.6 k. 0.5 k. 0.3 k. 1.2 k. Tilson Trail X National Park 1.0 k. Perry Point X U. S. F. S. TILSON 0.6 k. CREEK 0.4 k. 96 SKI Yellow Trail Park TRAIL 0.6 k. X 1150 Black Bay Narrows 0.9 k. Black Bay 0.4 k. 1130 KOOCHICHING STATE FOREST X 1140 1.3 k. TRAILS OWNERSHIP FACILITIES 1.1 k. KOOCHICHING Non Motorized Trails State Forest Land Parking 1120 Visitor Center U. S. F. S. easy more difficult Black Bay County Land Red Trail Boat Ramp 1110 W = Hiking/Walking National Land Fishing Pier X = Skiing STATE Trail Shelter X LOOKING FOR MORE INFORMATION ? Snowmobile Trails 0.8 k.
    [Show full text]
  • 2/23/2017 1 List of Terrestrial Invasive Species and Infested Areas in The
    2/23/2017 List of Terrestrial Invasive Species and Infested Areas in the 1854 Ceded Territory Common Buckthorn: Noxious weed – Restricted list St. Louis County: large, dense areas, widespread o all of the greater Duluth area, Moose Mountain SNA, Ruffed Grouse WMA, MN Point Pine Forest SNA, Quad Cities area, Buhl, Aurora, Cook, Lake Vermilion-Soudan Underground Mine State Park, Bear Head Lake State Park, Ely area Carlton County: less dense, smaller distribution than SLC o Jay Cooke State Forest, Fond du Lac State Forest (Red River area), Blackhoof WMA Lake County: low distribution in a few dense patches o Two Harbors area Cook County: rare o Grand Marais (1 known male? planted in a yard) Glossy Buckthorn: Noxious weed – Restricted list St. Louis County: large, dense areas, widespread (less than common buckthorn) o all of the greater Duluth area, Moose Mountain SNA, MN Point Pine Forest SNA, south of Eveleth (between Mud Lake and Saint Marys Lake), Lake Vermilion-Soudan Underground Mine State Park Carlton County: less dense, smaller distribution than St. Louis County o Hemlock Ravine SNA, Fond du Lac State Forest (Red River area), Blackhoof WMA, Moose Lake Exotic Honeysuckle: Noxious weed – Restricted list St. Louis County: large, dense areas, widespread (less than Common Buckthorn) o all of the greater Duluth area, Moose Mountain SNA, Ruffed Grouse WMA, MN Point Pine Forest SNA rest of the counties: widespread, less dense, smaller distribution than SLC Oriental Bittersweet: Noxious weed – Prohibited Eradicate list St. Louis County: pioneer population, rare o in Duluth (along I-35 around exit/entrance ramps 253A) and on private property in the East Hillside neighborhood, Fortune Bay Canada Thistle: Noxious weed – Prohibited Control list All counties: widespread, multiple dense patches o Superior National Forest, Moose Mountain SNA, MN Point Pine Forest SNA Spiny Plumeless Thistle: Noxious weed – Prohibited Control list St.
    [Show full text]
  • NRAP Calendar Year 18 Expenditure Summary
    Date: 1/15/2021 To: Jim Schowalter, Commissioner Minnesota Management and Budget From: Sarah Strommen, Commissioner Department of Natural Resources RE: Natural Resources Asset Preservation Expenditure Summary Report – CY20 Pursuant to Minnesota Statute 84.946, subdivision 4, enclosed is the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources’ Natural Resources Asset Preservation Expenditure Summary Report. This report is a list of projects funded during calendar year 2020 using Natural Resources Asset Preservation appropriations from legislative sessions L14, L17, L18 and L19. If your staff have any questions on this report, please have them contact Peter Hark at 651-259- 5701 or Peter.Hark@state.mn.us. Upon request this report is available in an alternative format. Enclosure CC: Roger Behrens, MMB Shannon Lotthammer, DNR Peter Hark, DNR Mary Robison, DNR Legislative Reference Library Natural Resources Asset Preservation Expenditure Summary Report – Calendar Year 2020 January 1, 2021 Natural Resources Asset Preservation Expenditure Summary Report (M.S. 84.946 Subd. 4) Calendar Year 2020 Expenditures by Project All amounts shown in $ L14 NRAP L17 NRAP L18 NRAP L19 NRAP Total CY20 Project R298611 R298615 R298618 R298625 Expenditures Arrowhead State Trail, Bridge 6,034.00 6,034.00 Beltrami Island State Forest, Road Reconstruction 88,751.00 799.50 89,550.50 Bemidji Area Offices, Roofs 1,080.00 30,401.38 31,481.38 Big Rice Lake WMA, Road 1,080.00 1,080.00 Blue Mounds State Park, Water System 151,130.09 151,130.09 Cambridge Office, Roof 360.00 41,982.00
    [Show full text]
  • Moves to Amend H.F. No. 5 As Follows:​ Delete Everything After the Enacting Clause and Insert:​ "A
    06/21/21 ​ REVISOR CKM/EH A21-0232​ 1.1 .................... moves to amend H.F. No. 5 as follows:​ 1.2 Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:​ 1.3 "ARTICLE 1​ 1.4 ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES APPROPRIATIONS​ 1.5 Section 1. ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES APPROPRIATIONS.​ 1.6 The sums shown in the columns marked "Appropriations" are appropriated to the agencies​ 1.7 and for the purposes specified in this article. The appropriations are from the general fund,​ 1.8 or another named fund, and are available for the fiscal years indicated for each purpose.​ 1.9 The figures "2022" and "2023" used in this article mean that the appropriations listed under​ 1.10 them are available for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2022, or June 30, 2023, respectively.​ 1.11 "The first year" is fiscal year 2022. "The second year" is fiscal year 2023. "The biennium"​ 1.12 is fiscal years 2022 and 2023. Appropriations and cancellations for the fiscal year ending​ 1.13 June 30, 2021, are effective the day following final enactment.​ 1.14 APPROPRIATIONS​ 1.15 Available for the Year​ 1.16 Ending June 30​ 1.17 2022​ 2023​ 1.18 Sec. 2. POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY​ 1.19 Subdivision 1. Total Appropriation​ $​ 112,170,000​ $​ 111,568,000​ 1.20 Appropriations by Fund​ 1.21 2022​ 2023​ 1.22 General​ 8,339,000​ 7,285,000​ 1.23 State Government​ 1.24 Special Revenue​ 75,000​ 75,000​ Article 1 Sec. 2.​ 1​ 06/21/21 ​ REVISOR CKM/EH A21-0232​ 2.1 Environmental​ 89,210,000​ 89,662,000​ 2.2 Remediation​ 14,546,000​ 14,546,000​ 2.3 The amounts that may be spent for each​ 2.4 purpose are specified in the following​ 2.5 subdivisions.​ 2.6 The commissioner must present the agency's​ 2.7 biennial budget for fiscal years 2024 and 2025​ 2.8 to the legislature in a transparent way by​ 2.9 agency division, including the proposed​ 2.10 budget bill and presentations of the budget to​ 2.11 committees and divisions with jurisdiction​ 2.12 over the agency's budget.​ 2.13 Subd.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Minnesota Statutes 2013 89.021 89.021 State Forests
    1 MINNESOTA STATUTES 2013 89.021 89.021 STATE FORESTS. Subdivision 1. Established. There are hereby established and reestablished as state forests, in accordance with the forest resource management policy and plan, all lands and waters now owned by the state or hereafter acquired by the state, excepting lands acquired for other specific purposes or tax-forfeited lands held in trust for the taxing districts unless incorporated therein as otherwise provided by law. History: 1943 c 171 s 1; 1963 c 332 s 1; 1982 c 511 s 9; 1990 c 473 s 3,6 Subd. 1a. Boundaries designated. The commissioner of natural resources may acquire by gift or purchase land or interests in land adjacent to a state forest. The commissioner shall propose legislation to change the boundaries of established state forests for the acquisition of land adjacent to the state forests, provided that the lands meet the definition of forest land as defined in section 89.001, subdivision 4. History: 2011 c 3 s 3 Subd. 2. Badoura State Forest. History: 1963 c 332 s 1; 1967 c 514 s 1; 1980 c 424 Subd. 3. Battleground State Forest. History: 1963 c 332 s 1 Subd. 4. Bear Island State Forest. History: 1963 c 332 s 1 Subd. 5. Beltrami Island State Forest. History: 1943 c 171 s 1; 1963 c 332 s 1; 2000 c 485 s 20 subd 1; 2004 c 262 art 2 s 14 Subd. 6. Big Fork State Forest. History: 1963 c 332 s 1 Subd. 7. Birch Lakes State Forest. History: 1963 c 332 s 1; 2008 c 368 art 1 s 23 Subd.
    [Show full text]
  • 1~11~~~~11Im~11M1~Mmm111111111111113 0307 00061 8069
    LEGISLATIVE REFERENCE LIBRARY ~ SD428.A2 M6 1986 -1~11~~~~11im~11m1~mmm111111111111113 0307 00061 8069 0 428 , A. M6 1 9 This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp (Funding for document digitization was provided, in part, by a grant from the Minnesota Historical & Cultural Heritage Program.) State Forest Recreation Areas Minnesota's 56 state forests contain over 3.2 million acres of state owned lands which are administered by the Department of Natural Resources, Division of Forestry. State forest lands are managed to produce timber and other forest crops, provide outdoor recreation, protect watershed, and perpetuate rare and distinctive species of flora and fauna. State forests are multiple use areas that are managed to provide a sustained yield of renewable resources, while maintaining or improving the quality of the forest. Minnesota's state forests provide unlimited opportunities for outdoor recreationists to pursue a variety of outdoor activities. Berry picking, mushroom hunting, wildflower identification, nature photography and hunting are just a few of the unstructured outdoor activities which can be accommodated in state forests. For people who prefer a more structured form of recreation, Minnesota's state forests contain over 50 campgrounds, most located on lakes or canoe routes. State forest campgrounds are of the primitive type designed to furnish only the basic needs of individuals who camp for the enjoyment of the outdoors. Each campsite consists of a cleared area, fireplace and table. In addition, pit toilets, garbage cans and drinking water may be provided.
    [Show full text]
  • Class G Tables of Geographic Cutter Numbers: Maps -- by Region Or
    G4127 NORTHWESTERN STATES. REGIONS, NATURAL G4127 FEATURES, ETC. .C8 Custer National Forest .L4 Lewis and Clark National Historic Trail .L5 Little Missouri River .M3 Madison Aquifer .M5 Missouri River .M52 Missouri River [wild & scenic river] .O7 Oregon National Historic Trail. Oregon Trail .W5 Williston Basin [geological basin] .Y4 Yellowstone River 1305 G4132 WEST NORTH CENTRAL STATES. REGIONS, G4132 NATURAL FEATURES, ETC. .D4 Des Moines River .R4 Red River of the North 1306 G4142 MINNESOTA. REGIONS, NATURAL FEATURES, ETC. G4142 .A2 Afton State Park .A4 Alexander, Lake .A42 Alexander Chain .A45 Alice Lake [Lake County] .B13 Baby Lake .B14 Bad Medicine Lake .B19 Ball Club Lake [Itasca County] .B2 Balsam Lake [Itasca County] .B22 Banning State Park .B25 Barrett Lake [Grant County] .B28 Bass Lake [Faribault County] .B29 Bass Lake [Itasca County : Deer River & Bass Brook townships] .B3 Basswood Lake [MN & Ont.] .B32 Basswood River [MN & Ont.] .B323 Battle Lake .B325 Bay Lake [Crow Wing County] .B33 Bear Head Lake State Park .B333 Bear Lake [Itasca County] .B339 Belle Taine, Lake .B34 Beltrami Island State Forest .B35 Bemidji, Lake .B37 Bertha Lake .B39 Big Birch Lake .B4 Big Kandiyohi Lake .B413 Big Lake [Beltrami County] .B415 Big Lake [Saint Louis County] .B417 Big Lake [Stearns County] .B42 Big Marine Lake .B43 Big Sandy Lake [Aitkin County] .B44 Big Spunk Lake .B45 Big Stone Lake [MN & SD] .B46 Big Stone Lake State Park .B49 Big Trout Lake .B53 Birch Coulee Battlefield State Historic Site .B533 Birch Coulee Creek .B54 Birch Lake [Cass County : Hiram & Birch Lake townships] .B55 Birch Lake [Lake County] .B56 Black Duck Lake .B57 Blackduck Lake [Beltrami County] .B58 Blue Mounds State Park .B584 Blueberry Lake [Becker County] .B585 Blueberry Lake [Wadena County] .B598 Boulder Lake Reservoir .B6 Boundary Waters Canoe Area .B62 Bowstring Lake [Itasca County] .B63 Boy Lake [Cass County] .B68 Bronson, Lake 1307 G4142 MINNESOTA.
    [Show full text]
  • Milebymile.Com Personal Road Trip Guide Minnesota United States Highway #2
    MileByMile.com Personal Road Trip Guide Minnesota United States Highway #2 Miles ITEM SUMMARY 0.0 Junction of Highway #71 North to communities of Turtle River, Blackduck and International Falls; Junction of Highway #197 South. Access to Bemidji St. University and the Paul Bunyan & Blue Ox State. Services, gas and diesel available at the highway. Highway #2 West to communities of Bagley, Mentor and Crookston. Access to the Lake Bemidji State Park on the North side of the highway. Various recreational activities such as camping, boating, picnicking, fishing, snowmobiling, birdwatching, year-round naturalist-led activities, swimming, biking, cross-country skiing, and hiking make this park a perfect playground for visitors. Hikers can enjoy the beauty of a tamarack bog filled with pitcher plants, insect-eating sundews, dragon's mouth, and snowy lady's slippers. Drive-in Sites 98 Sites Majority of sites provide woodland shade. Some provide privacy of a secluded site. In winter, one site is available for drive-in. Other sites are available on a walk-in basis after deep snow cover. Pull-Through Sites 4 Sites Two of the four pull-through sites are electrical. Electric Sites 43 Sites All sites are 30 amp. RV Length Limit 50 Feet. Access to Itasca State Park. Itasca State Park is Minnesota's oldest state park. Today, the park totals more than 32,000 acres and includes more than 100 lakes. Walk across the mighty Mississippi as it starts its winding journey 2,552 miles to the Gulf of Mexico. Camping - Drive-in Sites 226 Sites Located in two campgrounds Electric Sites 100 sites Located in both the park's campgrounds.
    [Show full text]