DOCSLIB.ORG

First Annual Independent Evaluation of New York's Tobacco Control Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
First Annual Independent Evaluation of New York's Tobacco Control Program STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Corning Tower The Governor Nelson A. Rockefeller Empire State Plaza Albany, New York 12237 Antonia C. Novello, M.D., M.P.H., Dr.P.H. Dennis P. Whalen Commissioner Executive Deputy Commissioner November 24, 2004 Dear Reader: I am pleased to provide to you the First Annual Independent Evaluation of New York’s Tobacco Control Program. The attached document presents a comprehensive review of New York’s substantial efforts to improve public health by helping more New Yorkers stop smoking. The report identifies our many successes, including: New York’s utilization of a “rigorous strategic plan and emphasis on evidenced-based interventions.” A decline in New York’s per capita cigarette consumption after 2000 that was faster than the national average. A steady decline in the rates of second hand smoke exposure both in the home and in the work place. Very high compliance (92.9 percent) with the Clean Indoor Air Act. An apparent significant reduction of second hand smoke exposure due to the implementation of the CIAA. The report also contains constructive criticisms of New York’s efforts, chiefly, our marketing efforts designed to counter the near limitless marketing resources of the tobacco industry. Prior to the publication of this report the Health Department took actions to improve and better coordinate its media and marketing efforts, which we believe will address this criticism. As you may know, New York has continuously committed tens of millions of dollars annually to tobacco control, more than almost every other state in the nation. And we maintained our high funding level even during the recent economic downturn, when many other states significantly reduced their tobacco control funding. As a public health official and a physician, I am gratified to see New York’s considerable funding and our aggressive actions, including the historic Clean Indoor Air Act and increased cigarette excise taxes, are measurably curbing tobacco usage and second hand smoke exposure. As the report itself states, it found “several results that suggest that trends in several smoking outcomes were more favorable in New York than the remaining United States.” We certainly agree. Thank you for your interest in this report and in New York’s successful tobacco control efforts. Sincerely, Antonia C. Novello, M.D., M.P.H., Dr.P.H. Commissioner of Health November 2004 First Annual Independent Evaluation of New York’s Tobacco Control Program Final Report Prepared for New York State Department of Health Corning Tower, Room 710 Albany, NY 12237-0676 Prepared by RTI International 3040 Cornwallis Road Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2194 RTI Project Number 08800.002 RTI Project Number 08800.002.002 First Annual Independent Evaluation of New York’s Tobacco Control Program Final Report November 2004 Prepared for New York State Department of Health Corning Tower, Room 710 Albany, NY 12237-0676 Prepared by RTI International* 3040 Cornwallis Road Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2194 *RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute. Contents Executive Summary ES-1 1. Overview and Purpose 1-1 2. The Burden of Tobacco in New York State 2-1 2.1 Health Consequences.............................................. 2-1 2.2 Economic Burden ................................................... 2-2 2.3 Social Causes of Smoking........................................ 2-2 2.3.1 History........................................................ 2-3 2.3.2 Recent Trends in Tobacco Industry Advertising and Promotion ............................. 2-4 2.3.3 Smoking in Movies........................................ 2-6 2.3.4 Other Forms of Tobacco Industry Influence ...... 2-7 2.3.5 Conclusions ................................................. 2-7 2.4 Investing in Tobacco Control to Curb the Burden of Tobacco ................................................................ 2-8 3. Tobacco Control in New York State 3-1 3.1 Brief History of Tobacco Control In New York.............. 3-1 3.2 New York Tobacco Control Program .......................... 3-4 4. Assessing New York’s Tobacco Control Program 4-1 4.1 Assessing the Evidence Base for the Program’s Strategy ............................................................... 4-1 4.1.1 Smoking Bans and Restrictions....................... 4-1 4.1.2 Multicomponent Mass Media Campaigns with Interventions ............................................... 4-3 4.1.3 Multicomponent Telephone Support Systems (Quitlines) ...................................... 4-4 iii 4.1.4 Health Care Provider Reminders Alone or With Provider Education to Promote Cessation .................................................... 4-5 4.1.5 Reducing Patient Costs for Treatments ............ 4-7 4.1.6 Increasing the Unit Price of Tobacco Products ..................................................... 4-7 4.1.7 Youth Access Law Enforcement....................... 4-9 4.2 Assessing the Implementation of the Program’s Strategies ............................................................4-11 4.2.1 State Documents on Program Implementation ..........................................4-12 4.2.2 Program Component Implementation and Quality.......................................................4-15 4.2.3 Stakeholder Comments ................................4-27 4.3 Summary of Programmatic Approach and Implementation ....................................................4-29 5. Independent Evaluation of New York’s Tobacco Control Program 5-1 5.1 Comprehensive Evaluation Plan Overview .................. 5-2 5.2 Evaluation Studies and Data Collection Activities......... 5-5 5.2.1 Cross-Cutting Evaluation Studies and Data Collection Activities....................................... 5-5 5.2.2 Evaluation Studies and Data Collection Activities in Support of Goal 1: Eliminate Exposure to Secondhand Smoke....................5-19 5.2.3 Evaluation Studies and Data Collection Activities in Support of Goal 2: Decrease the Social Acceptability of Tobacco Use...........5-27 5.2.4 Evaluation Studies and Data Collection Activities in Support of Goal 3: Promote Cessation from Tobacco Use .........................5-32 5.2.5 Evaluation Studies and Data Collection Activities in Support of Goal 4: Prevent the Initiation of Tobacco Use Among Youth and Young Adults ..............................................5-34 5.3 Evaluating Effectiveness.........................................5-37 5.3.1 Evaluating Program Effectiveness with Quantitative Data ........................................5-37 5.3.2 Evaluating Program Effectiveness with Qualitative Data ..........................................5-46 5.4 Dissemination.......................................................5-46 iv 6. Evaluation Findings 6-1 6.1 Overview .............................................................. 6-1 6.1.1 Comparisons with the Remaining United States......................................................... 6-2 6.1.2 Baseline Findings.......................................... 6-3 6.1.3 Evaluating the Clean Indoor Air Act................. 6-3 6.1.4 Organization of the Chapter ........................... 6-3 6.2 Cross-Cutting Measures of Program Progress— Prevalence of Smoking and Cigarette Consumption ..... 6-4 6.2.1 Simple Trend Analysis of Per Capita Cigarette Sales—New York versus the Remaining United States ............................... 6-4 6.2.2 Trends in the Prevalence of Adult Smoking....... 6-9 6.3 Goal 1: Eliminate Exposure to Secondhand Smoke ....6-15 6.3.1 Exposure to Secondhand Smoke....................6-16 6.3.2 Compliance with the Clean Indoor Air Act........6-21 6.3.3 Attitudes Toward the CIAA and Secondhand Smoke.......................................................6-33 6.3.4 News Media Coverage of the CIAA and Secondhand Smoke .....................................6-38 6.3.5 Behavior Change Related to Exposure to Secondhand Smoke .....................................6-42 6.3.6 Summary ...................................................6-57 6.3.7 Conclusions and Next Steps ..........................6-61 6.4 Goal 2: Decrease the Social Acceptability of Tobacco Use .........................................................6-62 6.4.1 Overview ...................................................6-62 6.4.2 Tobacco Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs ......6-63 6.4.3 Awareness of Antitobacco Media Messages ......6-75 6.4.4 Awareness of Pro-Tobacco Advertising and Promotions.................................................6-80 6.4.5 Summary ...................................................6-88 6.4.6 Conclusions and Next Steps ..........................6-90 6.5 Goal 3: Promote Cessation from Tobacco Use...........6-93 6.5.1 Overview ...................................................6-93 6.6 Goal 4: Prevent the Initiation of Tobacco Use Among Youth and Young Adults.............................6-114 6.6.1 Overview .................................................6-114 6.6.2 Methods...................................................6-114 6.6.3 Results ....................................................6-115 v 6.6.4 Discussion................................................6-124 6.6.5 Conclusions and Next Steps ........................6-126 7. Summary and Conclusions 7-1 7.1 Overview .............................................................. 7-1 7.2 New York Tobacco Control History and Context........... 7-2 7.3 Program Strategy and Implementation ...................... 7-4 7.4 Evaluation Findings ................................................ 7-6 7.4.1 Goal
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CONTINUED NEW CATEGORY ACCELERATION Trading Update - Ahead of Closed Period Commencing 28 June 2021
    8 June 2021 BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO p.l.c. 2021 First Half Pre-Close Trading Update CONTINUED NEW CATEGORY ACCELERATION Trading update - ahead of closed period commencing 28 June 2021 Jack Bowles, Chief Executive: ‘We are accelerating our transformation to build A Better Tomorrow. We are creating brands of the future and sustainable value for all our stakeholders. We added +1.4m non-combustible product consumers1 in Q1, to reach a total of 14.9m. We are investing and building strong, fast growing international brands in each segment, rapidly accelerating our reach and consumer acquisition, thanks to our digitalisation and our multi-category consumer-centric approach, supported by the right resources and products, and our agile organisation. Our portfolio of non-combustible products is tailored to meet the needs of adult consumers. We are growing New Categories at pace, encouraging more smokers to switch to scientifically substantiated reduced risk alternatives2. We continue to expect 2021 to be a pivotal year for the business, with accelerating New Category revenue growth, a clear pathway to New Category profitability by 2025, and leverage reducing to c.3x by year end. ESG is deeply embedded in our organisation, and we have set ourselves stretching targets: £5bn New Category revenue by 2025; 50 million consumers of non-combustible products and carbon neutrality across our own operations by 20303, which I am confident in delivering. In summary, we are accelerating our transformation with increased investment capitalising on our growing momentum in the New Categories, and a record quarter for consumer acquisition. This, together with our strong business performance, is reflected in our upgraded Group revenue growth guidance of above 5% for 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO Science & Technology
    BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO Science & Technology 2015 report Foreword 1 Dr David O’Reilly, Group Scientific and R&D Director RESEARCH PRIORITIES Stewardship and next generation products 2 Dr Christopher Proctor PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY From seed to smoke 4 Dr Kieron Edwards GOOD RESEARCH PRACTICE Good research practice — securing innovation 7 John McBrearty ANALYTICAL METHOD DEVELOPMENT Chemical characterisation of next generation Science & products 8 Dr Christopher Wright Technology POPULATION STUDIES Assessing the impact of new products 11 2015 Oscar Camacho STEWARDSHIP Leading the way in product risk assessment 14 About this Report This is a British American Tobacco p.l.c. report describing Dr Audrey Richter some of the activity of British American Tobacco Group Research & Development in the UK. References to ‘British TOBACCO HEATING PRODUCTS American Tobacco’, ‘we’, ‘us’ and ‘our’ when denoting Eliminating combustion to potentially opinion or activity refer to British American Tobacco Group Research & Development. reduce risk 16 Whilst reasonable steps have been taken to ensure that Dr Chuan Liu the information contained within this publication is correct, the authors, British American Tobacco, its agents, ELECTRONIC CIGARETTES contractors and sub-contractors give no warranty and make no representation as to its accuracy and aaccept no liability Rapid evolution presents new challenges 20 for any errors or omissions. Dr Kevin McAdam Any trademarks, service marks or logos used in this publication, and copyright in it, are the property of British
    [Show full text]
  • Second Annual Independent Evaluation of New York's Tobacco
    August 2005 Second Annual Independent Evaluation of New York’s Tobacco Control Program Final Report Prepared for New York State Department of Health Corning Tower, Room 710 Albany, NY 12237-0676 Prepared by RTI International 3040 Cornwallis Road Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2194 RTI Project Number 08800.003.002 RTI Project Number 08800.003.002 Second Annual Independent Evaluation of New York’s Tobacco Control Program Final Report August 2005 Prepared for New York State Department of Health Corning Tower, Room 710 Albany, NY 12237-0676 Prepared by Matthew C. Farrelly Kevin C. Davis James M. Nonnemaker Maria Girlando Erik Crankshaw Joanne Pais Betty Markatos Belle Federman RTI International* 3040 Cornwallis Road Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2194 The authors would like to thank Susan Murchie for editorial assistance and Kim Madsen and Mark Engelen for analytic support. Inquiries about this report should be directed to: Matthew C. Farrelly E-mail: [email protected] Telephone: 919-541-6852 *RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute. Contents Section Page Executive Summary ES-1 1. Introduction 1-1 2. Overview 2-1 2.1 Changes to the Strategic Plan .................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Addressing Recommendations from the 2004 Independent Evaluation Report .................................................................................................. 2-5 2.2.1 Overall Program Implementation .................................................... 2-5 2.2.2 Program Component Implementation .............................................. 2-7 2.2.3 Addressing Programmatic Goal-Oriented Evaluation Findings .............2-22 2.3 Summary of Progress in Addressing 2004 IER Recommendations .................2-33 3. Evaluation Studies and Methods 3-1 3.1 Evaluation Studies.................................................................................. 3-1 3.1.1 Adult Tobacco Surveys .................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2. Goal Area 1: Preventing Initiation of Tobacco Use
    C H A P T E R 2� Goal Area 1: Preventing Initiation of � Tobacco Use Among Young People� Goal Area 1� Preventing Initiation of Tobacco Use Among Young People Activities Outputs Inputs Outcomes 1 Completed activities Short-term Intermediate Long-term State health Community C HP A E T R 2 to reduce and department mobilization 6 13 and partners counteract pro- Increased Reduced tobacco messages knowledge of, initiation of improved anti- tobacco use by ▲ Counter- tobacco attitudes young people Goal Area 1: Preventing Initiation of Tobacco Use Among Young People UseAmongYoung Initiation of 1:Preventing Goal Area Tobacco marketing 2 toward, and Completed activities increased to disseminate support for 10 14 anti-tobacco and policies to reduce Reduced Reduced School- pro-health messages youth initiation susceptibility to tobacco-use based experimentation prevalence among prevention with tobacco young people 3 7 products Completed activities Increased to increase tobacco- anti-tobacco Policy and free policies and policies and regulatory } use of anti-tobacco programs in action curricula in schools schools 15 ▲ Reduced tobacco- Targeted to 4 8 Completed activities Increased related morbidity populations 11 to increase restrictions restriction and Decreased and mortality with tobacco- on tobacco sales to enforcement access to tobacco related minors and to enforce of restrictions on products disparities 16 those restrictions tobacco sales Decreased to minors tobacco-related disparities 5 Completed activities 9 12 19 to increase cigarette Reduced
    [Show full text]
  • A FOCUS on HARM REDUCTION Why It
    A FOCUS ON HARM REDUCTION Why it mattersSUSTAINABILITY FOCUS REPORT 2013: How we address the public health impact of our products A nicotine molecule In this report Focusing on the facts 2 At the core of our business strategy 3 Innovative nicotine products 4 ‘Safer’ tobacco products: the research 7 So, what’s next? 9 Our Chief Executive on why it matters b British American Tobacco Harm reduction: sustainability focus report 2013 Because it’s crucial to the future of our business. Surely tobacco harm reduction should just be about What areas are you concentrating on? getting people to quit smoking? Our approach to harm reduction has two distinct areas: The only way to be certain of avoiding the serious health risks nicotine-based alternatives and reduced-risk tobacco products. associated with smoking is not to smoke at all. However, despite In the nicotine category, we have established a stand-alone increasingly strict tobacco control policies, many people continue business solely dedicated to this area. This brings together our to smoke. And the World Health Organisation estimates that existing Nicoventures business with CN Creative, the e-cigarette 1 many more will do so in the future . So realistically the ‘quit or die’ company we acquired at the end of last year, into a single business approach to reducing the public health impact of smoking simply which will continue to operate under the Nicoventures name. isn’t enough. This business has already launched its first e-cigarette in the UK, For adults that choose to continue to smoke, tobacco harm which will be expanded into further markets in the coming year.
    [Show full text]
  • Rotational Health Warnings for Cigarettes File No
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580 Division of Advertising Practices May23,2008 MEMORANDUM TO: Public Records Office of the Secretary FROM: Sallie Schools Division of Advertising Practices SUBJECT: Rotational Health Warnings for Cigarettes File No. P854505 Please place the attached documents on the public record in the above-captioned matter. 1. August 16, 2007letter from Joseph T. Wong Esq. on behalf of Konci G & D Management Group (USA) Inc. to Sallie Schools. 2. September 4, 2007letter from Mary K. Engle to Joseph T. Wong Esq. on behalf of Konci G & D Management Group (USA) Inc. 3. August 20, 2007 letter from Hoo Tjhiang Han, Kretek International, to Sallie Schools. 4. September 5, 2007 letter from Mary K. Engle to Hoo Tjhiang Han, Kretek International. 5. September 6, 2007 letter from Hoo Tjhiang Han, Kretek International, to Sallie Schools. 6. September 7, 2007 letter from Mary K. Engle to Hoo Tjhiang Han, Kretek International. 7. August 23, 2007letter from Craig A. Koenigs on behalf of European Cigarette Imports, Inc. to Mary K. Engle. 8. September 10, 2007letter from Mary K. Engle to Craig A. Koenigs on behalf of European Cigarette Imports, Inc. 9. August 22, 2007 letter from Barry M. Boren on behalf of Tantus Tobacco, LLC to Mary K. Engle. 10. September 13, 2007 letter from Mary K. Engle to Barry M. Boren on behalf of Tantus Tobacco, LLC. 1 Public Records May23, 2008 Page 2 11. September 7, 2007 letter from Karen Kamperman, Tobacco Holdings, Inc. to Mary K. Engle. 12. September 13, 2007 letter from Mary K.
    [Show full text]
  • British American Tobacco and the ‘‘Insidious Impact of Illicit Trade’’ in Cigarettes Across Africa E Legresley,1 K Lee,2 M E Muggli,3 P Patel,4 J Collin,5 R D Hurt6
    Research paper Tob Control: first published as 10.1136/tc.2008.025999 on 10 July 2008. Downloaded from British American Tobacco and the ‘‘insidious impact of illicit trade’’ in cigarettes across Africa E LeGresley,1 K Lee,2 M E Muggli,3 P Patel,4 J Collin,5 R D Hurt6 1 4 Bank Note Pvt, Ottawa, ABSTRACT systematically search BAT’s publicly accessible 2 Ontario, Canada; Centre on Objectives: To provide an overview of the complicity of corporate documents produced in response to Global Change and Health, London School of Hygiene and British American Tobacco (BAT) in the illicit trade of smoking and health litigation has improved Tropical Medicine, London, UK; cigarettes across the African continent in terms of because of enhanced online access and improved 3 Mayo Clinic, Nicotine Research rationale, supply routes and scale. searching capabilities available at the British Program, St Paul, Minnesota, American Tobacco Document Archive (BATDA) 4 Methods: Analysis of internal BAT documents and USA; London School of industry publications. developed in 2004.15 Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK; 5 Global Health Results: BAT has relied on illegal channels to supply Understanding cigarette smuggling in Africa is Policy, Centre for International markets across Africa since the 1980s. Available important for two reasons. First, smuggling is Public Health Policy School of documents suggest smuggling has been an important substantial and, according to BAT’s estimates, is Health in Social Science component of BAT’s market entry strategy in order to gain growing,16 thus undermining public health efforts University of Edinburgh Medical Buildings, Edinburgh, UK; leverage in negotiating with governments for tax to address the upward trajectory of tobacco use on 17 6 Nicotine Dependence Center, concessions, compete with other transnational tobacco the continent.
    [Show full text]
  • British American Tobacco Tekel Announcement Friday, 22Nd February 2008
    www.bat.com British American Tobacco Tekel Announcement Friday, 22nd February 2008 CORPORATE PARTICIPANTS Paul Adams British American Tobacco – Chief Executive Paul Rayner British American Tobacco – Finance Director Michael Prideaux British American Tobacco - Corporate & Regulatory Affairs Director Ralph Edmondson British American Tobacco - Head of Investor Relations CONFERENCE CALL PARTICIPANTS Pan Yuk - Financial Times Adam Spielman - Citigroup – Analyst David Hayes - Lehman Brothers – Analyst David Jones - Reuters Elise Badoy - Goldman Sachs – Analyst Arefre Lewison Maria Gancheva – Merrill Lynch Eric Bloomquist - JPMorgan – Analyst Maretta Kelkey – DowJones Jonathan Fell - Deutsche Bank – Analyst Chas Manso - Dresdner Kleinwort - Analyst Operator Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the British American Tobacco Conference call hosted by Paul Adams. My name is Clementine and I will be your co-ordinator for today’s conference. For the duration of the call, you will be on listen-only; however, at the end of the call you will have the opportunity to ask questions. If at any time you need assistance, please press *0 on your telephone keypad and you will be connected to an operator. I am now handing you over to Paul Adams to begin today’s conference. Paul Adams - Chief Executive, British American Tobacco Well, good afternoon, everybody. It’s Paul Adams, Chief Executive, British American Tobacco. With me this afternoon, Paul Rayner, finance director, Michael Prideaux, corporate and regulatory affairs director and Ralph Edmondson, head of investor relations. We weren’t going to say anything beyond the press release in terms of any statement, and we’re open for any questions there may be. Operator Thank you.
    [Show full text]
  • “Look at Me, I Plan to Quit Smoking”: Bayesian Hierarchical Analysis of Adolescent Smokers’ Intention to Quit Smoking
    healthcare Article “Look at Me, I Plan to Quit Smoking”: Bayesian Hierarchical Analysis of Adolescent Smokers’ Intention to Quit Smoking John N. Ng’ombe 1,2,* , N. Rodgers Nedson 3 and Novan F. P. Tembo 4 1 Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36830, USA 2 Department of Agricultural Economics and Extension, University of Zambia, Lusaka 10101, Zambia 3 School of Medicine, University of Zambia, Lusaka 10101, Zambia; [email protected] 4 Department of Public Health, University of Lusaka, Lusaka 10101, Zambia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-334-844-5821 Received: 18 February 2020; Accepted: 25 March 2020; Published: 27 March 2020 Abstract: The tobacco epidemic is one of the most prominent public health threats the world has ever faced. Public health policy that seeks to limit the problem may have to target not only the price of tobacco but also the initiation stage in a smoker’s life—the adolescent stage. Most research on teen smoking focuses on initiation and other stories. Moreover, what determines the desire to quit smoking among teens is not well understood, even though planning to quit smoking is an important stage toward successful cessation. This research contributes to healthcare literature by using Bayesian hierarchical techniques, estimated using Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) and its extension, the No-U-Turn Sampler (NUTS), to empirically identify what drives the intention to quit smoking among teen smokers in Zambia. Results suggest that, among the junior secondary school-going adolescent smokers in Zambia, about 63% have plans to quit smoking.
    [Show full text]
  • National Kidney Foundation K/DOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines for Bone
    The Official Journal of the National Kidney Foundation American Journal of Kidney Diseases AJKDEditorial correspondence and manuscript submis- The appearance of the code at the bottom of the first sions should be addressed to Bertram L. Kasiske, MD, page of an article in this journal indicates the copyright Editor-in-Chief, AJKD, Hennepin Faculty Associates, owner’s consent that copies of the article may be made for 600 HFA Building, Room D508, 914 South 8th Street, personal or internal use, or for the personal or in- Minneapolis, MN 55404. Telephone: (612) 347-7770 ternal use of specific clients. This consent is given on the Business correspondence (subscriptions, change condition, however, that the copier pay the stated per-copy of address) should be addressed to the Publisher, fee through the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc (222 W.B. Saunders, Periodicals Department, 6277 Sea Rosewood Dr, Danvers, MA 01923; (978) 750-8400) for Harbor Dr, Orlando, FL 32887-4800. E-mail: elspcs@ copying beyond that permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of elsevier.com the US Copyright Law. This consent does not extend to Change of address notices, including both the old and other kinds of copying, such as copying for general distri- new addresses of the subscriber, should be sent at least one bution, for advertising or promotional purposes, for creat- month in advance. ing new collective works, or for resale. Absence of the code Customer Service: 1-800-654-2452; outside the United indicates that the material may not be processed through States and Canada, 1-407-345-4000. the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • The African Americanization of Menthol Cigarette Use in the United States
    Nicotine & Tobacco Research Volume 6, Supplement 1 (February 2004) S55–S65 The African Americanization of menthol cigarette use in the United States Phillip S. Gardiner [Received 23 December 2002; accepted 30 June 2003] Today, over 70% of African American smokers prefer menthol cigarettes, compared with 30% of White smokers. This unique social phenomenon was principally occasioned by the tobacco industry’s masterful manipulation of the burgeoning Black, urban, segregated, consumer market in the 1960s. Through the use of television and other advertising media, coupled with culturally tailored images and messages, the tobacco industry ‘‘African Americanized’’ menthol cigarettes. The tobacco industry successfully positioned mentholated products, especially Kool, as young, hip, new, and healthy. During the time that menthols were gaining a large market share in the African American community, the tobacco industry donated funds to African American organizations hoping to blunt the attack on their products. Many of the findings in this article are drawn from the tobacco industry documents disclosed following the Master Settlement Agreement in 1998. After a short review of the origins and growth of menthols, this article examines some key social factors that, when considered together, led to disproportionate use of mentholated cigarettes by African Americans compared with other Americans. Unfortunately, the long-term impact of the industry’s practice in this community may be partly responsible for the disproportionately high tobacco-related disease and mortality among African Americans generally and African American males particularly. Introduction menthol cigarettes and the adoption of these products by over 70% of African American smokers, as Mentholated cigarettes have been a ubiquitous part compared with 30% of White smokers (U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • RESULTS PROFILE for PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND Suggested Citation
    RESULTS PROFILE FOR PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND Suggested Citation: Propel Centre for Population Health Impact. 2014 (May). 2012/2013 Youth Smoking Survey: Results Profile for Prince Edward Island. Waterloo (ON): University of Waterloo, 1-18. HEALTH PROFILE FOR PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND The Propel Centre for Population Health Impact is proud to offer you this provincial profile of results from Health Canada’s 2012/2013 Youth Smoking Survey (YSS). This profile provides provincial results on tobacco, alcohol and drug use in addition to school connectedness, bullying, healthy eating and physical activity. This provincial profile aggregates data representative of Prince Edward Island’s grades 6 to 12 students. Each of the 53 participating Prince Edward Island schools received a school-specific profile of their results and were encouraged to share their results with their school community (teachers, parents, and students) to inform action on these findings. For copies of all provincial profiles across cycles, please visit cstads.ca/results. We created this profile to assist provincial and community leaders (educators, students, and public health workers) to prioritize actions that will create the healthiest environment possible in which students can thrive. The Propel Centre for Population Health Impact (Propel) at the University of Waterloo has centrally coordinated the YSS across Canada since 2004. In 2012/2013, Propel collaborated with the following partners. Please note the province of Manitoba did not participate in the 2012/2013 YSS. Memorial University of Newfoundland New Brunswick Health Council University of Prince Edward Island University of Saskatchewan Dalhousie University University of Alberta CHUM Research Centre (CRCHUM) University of Victoria Note: Beginning in 2014, the YSS will be renamed to the Canadian Student Tobacco, Alcohol and Drugs Survey (CSTADS) to reflect an increased focus on alcohol and drug use.
    [Show full text]