SGHHC/S5/21/7/A COMMITTEE on the SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT HANDLING of HARASSMENT COMPLAINTS AGENDA 7Th Meeting, 2021 (Session 5) Mond

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

SGHHC/S5/21/7/A COMMITTEE on the SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT HANDLING of HARASSMENT COMPLAINTS AGENDA 7Th Meeting, 2021 (Session 5) Mond SGHHC/S5/21/7/A COMMITTEE ON THE SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT HANDLING OF HARASSMENT COMPLAINTS AGENDA 7th Meeting, 2021 (Session 5) Monday 8 February 2021 The Committee will meet at 9.00 am in a virtual meeting. 1. Division between Scottish Government and party political matters: The Committee will take evidence from— Peter Murrell, Chief Executive, Scottish National Party. 2. Review of Evidence (in private): The Committee will review the evidence heard under item 1. Clerk to the Committee on the Scottish Government Handling of Harassment Complaints Email: [email protected] SGHHC/S5/21/7/A The papers for this meeting are as follows— Agenda Item 1 Paper from the Clerk SGHHC/S5/21/7/1 Private paper SGHHC/S5/21/7/2 (P) SGHHC COMMITTEE SGHHC/S5/21/7/1 Committee on Scottish Government Handling of Harassment Complaints 7th Meeting, 2021 (Session 5), 8 February 2021 Phase 2: Complaints Handling Evidence session 12: 8 February 2021 1. This paper has been produced prior to the Committee on the Scottish Government Handling of Harassment Complaints’ twelfth evidence session where the Committee will hear evidence from Peter Murrell, Chief Executive of the Scottish National Party. 2. Peter Murrell provided the Committee with written evidence on 4 August 2020 which can be found at Annexe A. Following this submission the Committee requested further information, resulting in Mr Murrell providing an additional written submission which can be found at Annexe B. 3. Mr Murrell gave oral evidence to the Committee on Tuesday 8 December 2020. The Official Report of this session can be found here. Following this evidence session, Mr Murrell sent the Committee some follow up information which can be found at Annexe C. Following this, the Committee requested further information, resulting in a further written submission from Mr Murrell which can be found at Annexe D. 4. In line with the Committee’s written statement on the handling of information and evidence all participants must comply with the court order made by the Lord Justice Clerk, Lady Dorrian, on 10 March 2020 preventing publication of the names and identity, and any information likely to disclose the identity, of the complainers in the criminal trial. 5. The Committee’s remit and approach to its inquiry is available on the Committee’s webpage. SGHHC Committee Clerks 4 February 2021 1 SGHHC COMMITTEE SGHHC/S5/21/7/1 Annexe A Written Submission from Peter Murrell, Chief Executive, SNP (4 August 2020) Dear Linda I am responding to your letter of 7 July 2020. The fact that the committee intended to seek my evidence was made known to me by a journalist on 18 June 2020. A further enquiry on 1 August 2020 from another journalist suggests that the committee will seek to ask me about matters out-with the terms of the inquiry remit or approach to the inquiry as set out in Annex C. Notwithstanding those concerns, I have prepared my response after careful consideration of your letter, the terms of the inquiry remit, and the annexes provided. There are aspects of your request that are not entirely clear but I have sought to interpret them as reasonably and as fully as I can. 1. Separation of SNP/Scottish Government roles a) The principal onus of ensuring that politicians – whether members of parliament or government ministers – do not use public office for party political purposes rests with the individual concerned. SNP MSPs abide by the Scottish Parliament Code of Conduct and Ministers abide by the Ministerial Code of Conduct. Special Advisers are bound by the Special Advisers Code of Conduct and also the Civil Service Code. b) The SNP does not know how the Scottish Government holds information. c) The SNP expects any of its members who hold public office – including ministerial office – to abide by the relevant rules of their office in terms of the appropriate separation of roles. The SNP cannot be the arbiter of what is or is not government business as we are not privy to the detail of government business. My understanding is that government business is subject to Freedom of Information legislation regardless of the channels it is conducted on. I assume therefore that a Minister or SpAd could not use party channels for government business as a way of avoiding transparency. d) You ask me for instances where ‘this’ (by which I assume you mean instances where a minister has used SNP channels when they should have used Scottish Government channels) may have been the case. I am not aware of any such instances. However, it would be entirely appropriate for Ministers to use SNP rather than Scottish Government channels for party political business. 2. SNP disciplinary and grievance procedures I attach copies of the following documents: - - Code of Conduct for Members - Disciplinary Rules - Standing Orders for the SNP Group in the Scottish Parliament - Standing Orders for the SNP Group on the United Kingdom Parliament 2 SGHHC COMMITTEE SGHHC/S5/21/7/1 I also attach the Grievance Procedure for employees of the Scottish National Party based at our Edinburgh headquarters. The Committee will be aware that there are a number of additional employment relationships, procedures and policies within Holyrood and Westminster for all those undertaking parliamentary duties and activities in those locations or elsewhere. Finally, I am attaching an email issued to all elected representatives and staff on 31 October 2017. It outlines an additional confidential, independent mechanism for reporting inappropriate behaviour following the emergence of the MeToo movement and media reports concerning the alleged behaviour of parliamentarians both at Holyrood and Westminster. The SNP has no communications between it and any of the individuals listed in your letter, in relation to the complaints raised under the Scottish Government procedure on handling of harassment complaints invoicing current or former ministers. 3. Requests of me in a personal capacity a) I became aware that complaints had been made under the Scottish Government procedure when the matter became public in August 2018. I knew about the meetings between Nicola and Alex Salmond at our home on 2 April and 14 July 2018 and I had the sense that something serious was being discussed. Nicola told me she couldn’t discuss the details. The nature of Nicola’s job means that when she tells me she can’t discuss something, I don’t press it. b) There was no action taken by the SNP in relation to these complaints before the matter became public in August 2018. c) The only such discussions would have been after the matter became public in August 2018 and in relation to the Party’s response. d) I was aware of meetings that took place at our home on 2 April and 14 July 2018, involving certain of the individuals listed. I was not present at these meetings and made no contribution to them. I have no direct knowledge of and therefore no comment to make on the development of the Scottish Government complaints policy, the judicial review, the application of the ministerial code and the civil service code, the handling of the complaints by the Scottish Government, or the culture within the Scottish Government. Yours sincerely PETER MURRELL Chief Executive 4 August 2020 3 SGHHC COMMITTEE SGHHC/S5/21/7/1 Annexe B Written Submission from Peter Murrell, Chief Executive, SNP (2 October 2020) Dear Linda Thank you for your letter of 9 September 2020. In responding, I note the Committee’s statement of 29 September and the assertion that I and/or the SNP have not been forthcoming in providing the evidence that you asked for. It is therefore important to immediately put on record that the SNP takes its responsibilities seriously and has the utmost respect for the Scottish Parliament - as I do. I believe that my response of 4 August sought to answer fully the questions that had been asked of me, and I did so within the timeframe asked of me. For clarity, I do not accept that I or the SNP have acted in any way other than to cooperate with the Committee to the fullest extent possible. In particular, the Committee’s letter of 9 September, supplemented by emails received from the clerking team on 22 and 23 September, made additional requests to those previously asked. By definition, my written submission on 4 August did not cover these requests because they had not, at that point, been asked. I would also note that your letter of 9 September asked for a response “as soon as is practicable” but set no deadline. I had committed to the clerking team to reply within four weeks and by no later than 7 October. I am therefore not clear of the factual basis for the Committee’s claim that I or the SNP has either failed to provide material sought or missed any deadline set. In turning to the requests for additional material, in the letter of 9 September it is asserted in relation to my previous response that “the Committee’s intention was that you would canvass colleagues for relevant information and records as well as submitting any evidence you were aware of as an individual”. The letter then goes on to ask whether I did, or did not, do so. I would draw the Committee’s attention to Annexe A of the letter sent to me on 7 July. It explicitly asks that those asked to provide evidence do not discuss that evidence with others asked to give personal evidence. Despite this contradiction, I have sought to provide clarity in my response on this point below. More broadly, the SNP’s legal advisers have engaged with the clerking team to seek to clarify other aspects of the Committee’s requests.
Recommended publications
  • The Sturgeon-Salmond Scandal Sleaze and Secrecy in the Ruling Party of Government
    The Sturgeon-Salmond scandal Sleaze and secrecy in the ruling party of government The Salmond-Sturgeon Scandal | March 2021 | 1 Contents Foreword | Page 3 What did Nicola Sturgeon know and when? | Page 4 The ‘botched’ government investigation | Page 7 The disastrous handling of the judicial review | Page 8 The telltale signs of a cover up | Page 9 Did Sturgeon break the Ministerial Code? | Page 10 The charge sheet of resignation matters | Page 11 Annex: Supporting Evidence | Page 12 The Salmond-Sturgeon Dossier | March 2021 | 2 Foreword: Douglas Ross This scandal is at boiling point. Secrecy and We do not accuse her of conspiracy, as she tries sleaze is engulfing the Scottish Parliament and to claim. We accuse her of lying. Scottish Government, threatening to consume the entire leadership of the ruling party. She is not on the women’s side, whatever she proclaims. Her government let them down, and At stake is more than a political fight. This is about stands accused of leaking one of their names to the fundamental issue of honesty and truth in Salmond’s side. government. It’s about the basic question of right and wrong. It goes to the heart of our democracy. We are not on Salmond’s side, another straw man she has used. His actions are unacceptable. The First Minister stands accused of lying to the But they do not negate the First Minister’s own Scottish Parliament and breaking the Ministerial inexcusable actions, albeit of a different nature. Code. The SNP chief executive stands accused of abusing his power. Senior government officials The Scottish Conservative charge against Nicola stand accused of dreadful mistakes and terrible Sturgeon is simple.
    [Show full text]
  • The Scottish Conservative 2021 Manifesto | Rebuild Scotland
    The Scottish Conservative 2021 Manifesto | Rebuild Scotland 22 Apr 2021 Our manifesto is a positive policy programme, focused on rebuilding Scotland after the worst year that many of us have faced in living memory. On delivering an economic recovery that stops widespread unemployment and creates good jobs and growth in every part of our country. On supporting our education system to catch up every single pupil from a year of disrupted schooling – so that we do not face the prospect of a Covid- generation left behind. And funding our NHS to get through the backlog of a year of delayed operations. It is a programme that will ensure our recovery from coronavirus. Yet our manifesto does so much more than that, it sets out the issues that the Scottish Conservatives will fight for in the next Parliament. For renewing our justice system, so that it is firmly on the side of victims and not those who commit crime. For devolving power and funding to communities, so that we can put an end to the era of SNP centralisation and better support local services, like schools and roads. For creating a dynamic, innovative green economy, that works with business to drive a skills revolution and achieve our 2045 net zero ambition. And so much more. With our manifesto setting out 15 major bills that we would seek to take forward and pass through a Scottish Parliament working to rebuild our country. Using the powers of the Scottish Parliament to their maximum, rather than complaining that they are never enough. It is a manifesto that, at its heart, secures and accelerates our recovery from coronavirus.
    [Show full text]
  • SNP Election Manifesto
    SCOTTISH NATIONAL PARTY MANIFESTO 2011 A SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT WORKING FOR SCOTLAND “Scotland is on a journey and the path ahead is a bright one. Now is a time for Scotland to keep moving forward.” Our record Our team Our vision Building a better nation Working for Scotland A fairer Scotland council tax frozen We will freeze the Council Tax throughout the next Parliament, enabling households to keep more of the money they earn nhs protected We will protect the NHS budget, allowing us to deliver faster and better treatment including the earlier detection and treatment of cancer extra police We will continue to drive down crime by keeping the 1000 extra police in our communities and by taking more money from criminals to give back to the communities they have damaged creating jobs We will work to win new job-creating powers for the Scottish Parliament scotland’s future We will give Scots the opportunity to decide our nation’s future in an independence referendum energy windfall We will increase our renewables target to 100% by 2020, ensuring 130,000 jobs are delivered in the low-carbon economy youth skills We will build the skills of young Scots with 100,000 training opportunities each year including 25,000 modern apprenticeships free education We will keep university education free so that access to higher education is based on the ability to learn, not the ability to pay futures fund We will deliver a fairer Scotland with a new £250 million Scottish Futures Fund, using the savings realised from the Forth Replacement Crossing better schools And we will ensure a fair start for young Scots with new investment in early years and a school building programme that will cut by half the number of pupils in crumbling schools These elections are about Scotland.
    [Show full text]
  • Revue Française De Civilisation Britannique, XX-3
    Revue Française de Civilisation Britannique French Journal of British Studies XX-3 | 2015 The 2015 General Election in the United Kingdom Les élections législatives de 2015 au Royaume-Uni David Fée et Romain Garbaye (dir.) Édition électronique URL : http://journals.openedition.org/rfcb/474 DOI : 10.4000/rfcb.474 ISSN : 2429-4373 Éditeur CRECIB - Centre de recherche et d'études en civilisation britannique Référence électronique David Fée et Romain Garbaye (dir.), Revue Française de Civilisation Britannique, XX-3 | 2015, « The 2015 General Election in the United Kingdom » [En ligne], mis en ligne le 16 octobre 2015, consulté le 05 mars 2020. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/rfcb/474 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/rfcb.474 Ce document a été généré automatiquement le 5 mars 2020. Revue française de civilisation britannique est mis à disposition selon les termes de la licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International. 1 SOMMAIRE Avant-Propos David Fée et Romain Garbaye New Context, Old Campaign The Conservatives: their Sweetest Victory? Tim Bale et Paul Webb “The Wall was Too High”: the Four Predicaments of Mr Miliband Eric Shaw La fabrique des députés ou l'art de sélectionner les candidats travaillistes et conservateurs aux élections législatives de 2015 Agnès Alexandre-Collier et Emmanuelle Avril Trying to Turn up the Turnout: Youth Wings and the Youth Vote in the 2015 General Election Sarah Pickard The Stage-Management of the leaders’ personal lives in the 2015 General Election Sabine Michelon Key debates in the 2015 campaign Fiscal Policy, Public Spending and the 2015 General Election Nicholas Sowels Monetary Policy in the Conservatives’ 2015 General Election Campaign Nathalie Champroux The Cost of Broken Promises or How Policy Failure Can Help Win Elections - Immigration and the 2015 UK General Election James Hampshire The House is on Fire: Housing and the 2015 General Election David Fée The NHS at the Heart of the Election Campaign.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid)
    Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid) Wednesday 10 February 2021 Session 5 © Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body Information on the Scottish Parliament’s copyright policy can be found on the website - www.parliament.scot or by contacting Public Information on 0131 348 5000 Wednesday 10 February 2021 CONTENTS Col. FIRST MINISTER’S QUESTION TIME ................................................................................................................ 1 Committee on the Scottish Government Handling of Harassment Complaints (Evidence) ........................ 2 Ministerial Code (Potential Breach) ......................................................................................................... 6 Care Home Visits .................................................................................................................................... 8 Covid-19 (Protections for Tenants) ........................................................................................................ 10 Schools (Return During Holiday Period) ................................................................................................ 12 A9 and A96 (Dualling Completion) ........................................................................................................ 13 Covid-19 (Travel to Vaccination Hubs) .................................................................................................. 15 Covid Vaccination Priority Groups (Police Officers) ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Official Report, Committee on Scottish of the Extraordinary Things About It
    Committee on the Scottish Government Handling of Harassment Complaints Friday 26 February 2021 Session 5 © Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body Information on the Scottish Parliament’s copyright policy can be found on the website - www.parliament.scot or by contacting Public Information on 0131 348 5000 Friday 26 February 2021 CONTENTS Col. SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT HANDLING OF HARASSMENT COMPLAINTS .................................................................... 1 COMMITTEE ON THE SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT HANDLING OF HARASSMENT COMPLAINTS 13th Meeting 2021, Session 5 CONVENER *Linda Fabiani (East Kilbride) (SNP) DEPUTY CONVENER *Margaret Mitchell (Central Scotland) (Con) COMMITTEE MEMBERS *Dr Alasdair Allan (Na h-Eileanan an Iar) (SNP) *Jackie Baillie (Dumbarton) (Lab) *Alex Cole-Hamilton (Edinburgh Western) (LD) *Murdo Fraser (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Con) Alison Johnstone (Lothian) (Green) *Stuart McMillan (Greenock and Inverclyde) (SNP) *Maureen Watt (Aberdeen South and North Kincardine) (SNP) *attended THE FOLLOWING ALSO PARTICIPATED: The Rt Hon Alex Salmond Andy Wightman (Lothian) (Ind) LOCATION The Robert Burns Room (CR1) 1 26 FEBRUARY 2021 2 and questions should be phrased in general terms, Scottish Parliament where possible, to avoid the risk of jigsaw identification of complainants. Committee on the Scottish In addition, do not refer to civil servants by Government Handling of name unless absolutely necessary, and do not Harassment Complaints refer to civil servants by name below senior civil service level. I emphasise that the committee Friday 26 February 2021 would be content to receive written supplementary points, should Mr Salmond have concerns that a response to a question may stray into this territory. [The Convener opened the meeting at 12:30] With that, I welcome Alex Salmond, former First Scottish Government Handling of Minister of Scotland.
    [Show full text]
  • Sghhc/S5/21/13/A Committee on the Scottish Government
    SGHHC/S5/21/13/A COMMITTEE ON THE SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT HANDLING OF HARASSMENT COMPLAINTS AGENDA 13th Meeting, 2021 (Session 5) Friday 26 February 2021 The Committee will meet at 12.30 pm in the Robert Burns Room (CR1). 1. Scottish Government Handling of Harassment Complaints: The Committee will take evidence from— The Rt Hon. Alex Salmond, former First Minister. 2. Review of Evidence (in private): Committee will review the evidence taken as part of its inquiry. Clerk to the Committee on the Scottish Government Handling of Harassment Complaints The Scottish Parliament Edinburgh Email: [email protected] SGHHC/S5/21/13/A The papers for this meeting are as follows— Item 1 Paper from the Clerk SGHHC/S5/21/13/1 Private Paper SGHHC/S5/21/13/2 SGHHC COMMITTEE SGHHC/S5/21/13/1 Committee on Scottish Government Handling of Harassment Complaints 13th Meeting, 2021 (Session 5), 26 February 2021 Submissions from the Rt Hon. Alex Salmond Background 1. This paper has been produced for the Committee on the Scottish Government Handling of Harassment Complaints to inform its thirteenth evidence session. 2. This purpose of this session is to take evidence from the Rt Hon. Alex Salmond, former First Minister. Mr Salmond was First Minister of Scotland from 2007 to 2014. Written Evidence Received 3. The Committee wrote to Mr Salmond on 7 July 2020 requesting written evidence from him. The following submissions have been received: • Complaints Handling submission – available on the Committee’s webpage and attached at Annexe A. • Judicial Review submission – available on the Committee’s webpage and can also be found at Annexe B.
    [Show full text]
  • CONFERENCE 2018 1 Welcome to Conference Welcome to the Granite City – and Welcome to SNP Conference
    2018 CONFERENCE CONFERENCE CONFERENCE AECC, ABERDEEN 8-9 JUNE 2018 If education is a ‘priority’ then teachers’ pay needs to be a priority. Support the campaign: www.eis.org.uk/valueteachers Printed and published by The Educational Institute of Scotland, 46 Moray Place, Edinburgh EH3 6BH, May 2018 Conference Essentials Contents Welcome to Conference ................... 3 Our Record ................................................. 4 Agenda ...................................................... 23 Exhibitors .................................................. 49 Fringe Programme ............................. 55 Maps ............................................................81 Essential Information ......................... 84 The report of the Standing Orders and Agenda Committee (Session 1); the Office Bearer Reports (Session 3); and the Standing Orders for National Conference, are all available for viewing and download via the Conference App https://conf.snp.org DISCLAIMER The Scottish National Party has provided assistance in arranging exhibitions and fringe meetings by various organisations at Conference. This assistance does not necessarily imply any support of that organisation. Fringe listings and selection of speakers are wholly a matter for the sponsors and organisers of fringe meetings, and as such the content of the listings and the meetings may not reflect the views of the SNP. Likewise, the SNP does not endorse the products advertised in this guide or recommend any of the services advertised. Promoted by Peter Murrell on behalf of the Scottish National Party, both at 3 Jackson’s Entry, Edinburgh EH8 8PJ. Printed by Saltire Print, 60 Brook Street, Glasgow G40 2AB. CONFERENCE 2018 1 Welcome to Conference Welcome to the Granite City – and welcome to SNP Conference. We gather having just marked an incredible eleven years of SNP government. I’m proud of our record, and proud that our list of achievements continues to grow.
    [Show full text]
  • SNP Will Give Us a Strong Voice in Europe, Protect Our National Interest, and Make Sure Scotland Gets the Best Deal
    Vote for Scotland 04 / European Manifesto Find out why voting SNP will give us a strong voice in Europe, protect our national interest, and make sure Scotland gets the best deal. Discover how Independence in Europe will change all our lives for the better. Read our European report card and see how we will continue to dedicate ourselves to protecting Scottish interests. Finally, meet the people who will be elected for the SNP on June 10 and discover how your vote can ensure Scotland’s voice is heard. Foreword Let’s demonstrate our commitment to building international peace and reconciliation. The world is changing fast; Europe is moving on. In such a dynamic international environment our country must move And let’s leave no one in any doubt that we are totally committed on too. to defending our country’s interests. In the great international forums of the world, like the EU, The SNP is fighting to save our fishing and other great national Scotland needs a voice. And we need it urgently. industries. We are campaigning to restore fairness to our tax system and we are speaking up to let the world know Scotland It will be a voice to protect our vital national interests and to is opposed to the war in Iraq. promote our values. Why? Because the SNP is Scotland’s voice. On May 1, ten new nations joined the European Union as full and equal independent nations. On June 10 let’s make our voice heard. Vote SNP. If even tiny Malta can sit at the top-table of Europe, then why shouldn’t Scotland? Let’s show the world that we in Scotland want to play our John Swinney MSP Leader of the SNP part in European and global developments.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sturgeon-Salmond Scandal Sleaze and Secrecy in the Ruling Party of Government
    The Sturgeon-Salmond scandal Sleaze and secrecy in the ruling party of government The Salmond-Sturgeon Scandal | March 2021 | 1 Contents Foreward | Page 3 What did Nicola Sturgeon know and when? | Page 4 The ‘botched’ government investigation | Page 7 The disastrous handling of the judicial review | Page 8 The telltale signs of a cover up | Page 9 Did Sturgeon break the Ministerial Code? | Page 10 The charge sheet of resignation matters | Page 11 Annex: Supporting Evidence | Page 12 The Salmond-Sturgeon Dossier | March 2021 | 2 Foreword: Douglas Ross This scandal is at boiling point. Secrecy and We do not accuse her of conspiracy, as she tries sleaze is engulfing the Scottish Parliament and to claim. We accuse her of lying. Scottish Government, threatening to consume the entire leadership of the ruling party. She is not on the women’s side, whatever she proclaims. Her government let them down, and At stake is more than a political fight. This is about stands accused of leaking one of their names to the fundamental issue of honesty and truth in Salmond’s side. government. It’s about the basic question of right and wrong. It goes to the heart of our democracy. We are not on Salmond’s side, another straw man she has used. His actions are unacceptable. The First Minister stands accused of lying to the But they do not negate the First Minister’s own Scottish Parliament and breaking the Ministerial inexcusable actions, albeit of a different nature. Code. The SNP chief executive stands accused of abusing his power. Senior government officials The Scottish Conservative charge against Nicola stand accused of dreadful mistakes and terrible Sturgeon is simple.
    [Show full text]
  • Baby Box Scrap the Public Sector Pay Cap Free Tuition Fees Phase Out
    Baby box Scrap the public sector pay cap Free tuition fees Phase out petrol and diesel vehicles by 2032 - eight years ahead 83 RD of UK target 650 schools built or refurbished Scottish ANNUAL NATIONAL CONFERENCE THE SEC CENTRE, GLASGOW 8 – 10 OCTOBER 2017 THE SEC CENTRE, GLASGOW 8 – 10 OCTOBER CONFERENCE NATIONAL ANNUAL National Investment Bank £750 million more for schools, much of it going direct to head teachers Deposit return scheme for bottles and cans Small business bonus Double childcare provision to 30 hours a week Record health spending PROGRESS and over 12,000 more NHS staff Free personal care extended to all under 65 who need it Prescription charges abolished Free sanitary products provided in schools, colleges and universities to tackle period poverty 200,000 modern apprenticeships End rough sleeping Extra bobbies on the beat, driving crime down to a 43-year low Promoting active travel, doubling the walking and cycling budget Protecting the free bus pass and personal care for pensioners Aberdeen bypass and A9 dualling Queensferry Crossing and Borders railway Scotland-wide charging network for electric and hybrid vehicles World-leading climate change targets New measures to encourage healthy eating 60,000 affordable homes completed, and 50,000 more by 2021 Protecting the most vulnerable in society from the worst of Tory cuts First government in UK to pay Living Wage to all staff Fracking banned Votes at 16 in Scottish Parliament and local government elections EXPANDING HEATHROW IS HELPING SCOTLAND BOOST EXP RTS TOMATIN DISTILLERY, ONE OF THE MANY SCOTTISH BUSINESSES THAT SUPPORT HEATHROW EXPANSION With connections to Aberdeen, Edinburgh, Glasgow and Inverness, Heathrow is the gateway to global markets for Scottish exports – like whisky from the Tomatin Distillery.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter from the Convener to Peter Murrell, 23
    Committee on the Scottish Government Handling of Harassment Complaints Peter Murrell c/o Clerk to the Committee Chief Executive Room T1.03 Scottish National Party The Scottish Parliament Edinburgh EH99 1SP [email protected] 23 December 2020 Dear Mr Murrell Thank you for providing evidence to the Committee on 8 December and for the supplementary submission you provided following that evidence session. I am writing to provide the opportunity for you to give further clarification to the Committee on a number of matters and ask whether any further detail is available on elements of your evidence. Awareness of the meeting You stated in oral evidence that “I was not aware that he [Alex Salmond] was coming to the house.”; you also stated “I was not really aware that he was coming to the house on the first occasion [2 April],” and “I think at some point on the previous day I was aware that Alex was coming to the house.” The Committee would be grateful if you could confirm when you knew that the former First Minister was coming to the house and any details of how you knew this to be the case, to the best of your recollection. Your written submission and oral evidence suggested you were not present at the meeting on 2 April. However, towards the end of your oral evidence you confirmed that you arrived home “not long before the meeting ended”. The Committee would appreciate any further clarification you wish to add to your evidence on this matter. Status of the meeting The First Minister’s submission suggests that she believed that the former First Minister may be seeking to meet her in order to resign from the SNP.
    [Show full text]