Downloaded By: [Stanford University] At: 21:14 19 February 2008 Copyright 27(1):9–42 ANTHROPOLOGY, MEDICAL ohma h eateto nhoooy tnodUiest,Safr,C 94305-2034. CA Stanford, University, Stanford Anthropology, of Department [email protected] E-mail: the at China him Modern to (The of Smokers’’. Making Cigarette the Chinese in among and Memory-Making Journal) and China Exception- and Death, including Tobacco’s health, Sociality, ‘‘Depoliticizing terrains public Male include studies, ality: Kohrman’s intellectual science of various publications critical Recent economy, engages embodiment. political research theory, gender current governmentality, His anthropology. medical e od:Cia iaets otr;ebdmn;gvrmnaiy masculinity governmentality; embodiment; doctors; cigarettes; China; Words: Key O:10.1080/01459740701831401 DOI: online print/1545-5882 0145-9740 ISSN: M country. the outside sold and being in cigarettes years of recent over trillions PRC—made facilitating the at in others annually tobacco, Chinese death protecting from at tobacco-induced aimed citizens for 2003, decisions—some responsibility since leadership of incoherent ongoing deflection from fieldwork away a my is in important gleaned most effects interactions shaping the in the multilevel significant Of suffering? especially that phenomena. been tobacco-induced have these argue embodiment nationwide male I and cigarette biopolitics of heuristics, frequent of governmentality engines become China on as in Building blamed physicians have and effect smokers what to and How ATTHEW # oenetlt,Embodiment, Governmentality, n h ieso fBaein Blame of Diversion the and K 08Tyo rni ru,LLC Group, Francis & Taylor 2008 OHRMAN mkn mn Doctors: among Smoking oiso ifrne xeine fDsblt n ntttoa Advocacy Institutional and Disability of Experiences Difference: of Bodies otmoayChina Contemporary sa sitn rfso tSafr nvriy hr eseilzsin specializes he where University, Stanford at professor assistant an is ate Kohrman Matthew Ui.o aionaPes.Crepnec a edirected be may Correspondence Press). California of (Univ. ARTICLES 9 Downloaded By: [Stanford University] At: 21:14 19 February 2008 10 fCiascgrteidsr u eur ejn oloe iaca and to financial companies foreign loosen for to difficult Beijing it made require Republic have the Peoples but that States, the barriers industry United administrative of cigarette the control China’s by monopoly led of party-state’s the countries the into 13 endorse related. of admission tobacco terms executives are China’s by stipulations of those out of Hammered prize agreed Many long-sought Organization. negotiators Trade 2001, their World In allowing China. terms involving moves on recent 2005). two Reid in 2000; glimpsed al. et (Chaloupka indicating toxic data increasingly highly empirical by is indisputable political of it legitimacy light of that their in font tobacco up a regulate shoring as to con- striving (b) sales (a) tobacco and more: using preeminence or of a decades economic strategy two pursuing longstanding past been a the have during tinuing organizations tobacco international regarding Executives track key dual leadership. and transnational regimes of state 2005). of feature Center paradoxical National 1998; and al. distinctive tobacco et from (Liu toll percent 300 death as annual much country’s as the jump Omar 2050, HIV will and if from and now century there between Eriksen, 21st deaths hold, times (40 the Mackay, annual year a in citizens than 2006; million fate a greater over (ACS same kill currently cigarettes the persist China, In meet 2006). rates will smoking that are times present which ten diversion age. and our decisions, the century, of of leadership disasters is type human of distinct greatest effect decades the a of significant been from one increasingly has fostering away In force effect? an responsibility contributive what that of to a and and that situation argue a governance such I created article, have furtively forma- this as polity the in pilloried China’s Chinese turns being of and today are tion twists but What wherein forces— morbidity? cigarettes situation sociopolitical tobacco-induced smoke circulated promoting a What often widely only to ask: more not to led doctors the one recent—have of begs and China one longstanding southwest in in published papers broadside editorial This hyaeavctso adoesoig hyhp o’lb hardcore be to you’ll business hope their allowing They thereby smoking. diseases, secretly, (Editorial, But more flourish hardcore altogether. even quit of contracting to smokers, advocates or a less quitting your are smoke to successfully to harmful they is you you ‘‘smoking to encourage that you and forward tell health,’’ they ‘‘look surface who the On people times.’’ thousand of kinds the cisely atcpto yitrainllaesi hsprdxclstaincnbe can situation paradoxical this in leaders international by Participation a lays annihilation this animating avarice, corporate to addition In last worldwide people million 100 least at killed smoking Cigarette ihaOln eotdta,i oeaes[fCia,mr hn55 than more China], [of areas some smokers in are that, doctors reported Online Xinhua eia esne hudb responsible. be should personnel Medical .KOHRMAN M. iyDaily City ... hs id fdcoswosoe vrl,aepre- are overall, smoke, who doctors of kinds These . umn,Yna,My3,2005). 31, May Yunnan, Kunming, , ... ale hsMrh2t,however, 27th, March this Earlier = IS,adi rsn trends present if and AIDS), % of Downloaded By: [Stanford University] At: 21:14 19 February 2008 edeete hi iaetst R iieso hi akgn,fles and filters, packaging, their factories. or cigarette citizens Chinese PRC to flavorings to cigarettes their either peddle rmdyt-a oadtepreoso oac products? tobacco of purveyors hostility the scant toward direct day-to-day nevertheless understand, from they tobacco-induced communities, to the their of ravaging aware difficult increasingly suffering contemporary are like they polity More although a that, in such citizens obvious. China particular, entangling In processes effects. the social specific the are their assert what and China forces societal to in attendant are circulation is however, ongoing elsewhere tobacco sustaining and been have engagingtransnational, and diseases, tobacco-related efforts. tobacco-control of international funding with treatment proactively labels, the warning with in packaging advancements and Health, of reductions Ministry tar-level the estab- under mandating association cessation, and office smoking tobacco-control a promoting lishing dangers, tobacco’s about on information centered Instead, has control marketplace. tobacco Chinese recently, ing world the the from in tobacco elsewhere not like eradicating have at sure, be aimed to been (TobaccoChina initiatives, These taxes initiatives. tobacco-control yearly promoting trillion in 2 billion over of $36 high annual years US all-time 2007). 2006, record several Online new In a for a 2004:169). spawning hit industry Xiong cigarettes sticks, by and Chinese generator (Liu of turn tax production millennium’s top tripled, at country’s nearly running industry the contri- tobacco percentage domestic it the China’s mid-1990s, making of the revenue to state 1970s to late bution the From dizzying. been einlgvrmns seilyi h onr’ orriln ra,to areas, strategy. inland development poorer a as country’s commerce the on tobacco pressure in intensified expand They especially financing. ever governments, government than Mao’s for more regional After cow tobacco cash note. embraced a worth party-state as the also before of are directors decades 1976, three in past death the over China governments. porary national ratifying other 2005, 140 Tobacco in over treaty on today the is Convention ratified what Congress Framework joining People’s WHO’s National public PRC’s (the on global The history first Control). work very in at the treaty of fast health language were final member-states the track—negotiating (WHO) another Organization Health World ananMoeaosalst oeg mot,adrthtu a quotas tax up ratchet leaders. and local imports, on foreign expansion, placed industry to supervise obstacles to Mao-era Company maintain Tobacco (STMA) National Administration China Monopoly its Tobacco and State the created leaders party osyta hs aaoia edrhpmvs toc ainland national once at moves, leadership paradoxical these that say To been have party-state the of branches 1980s, the since Meanwhile, oeprl oetclaesi eiin hpn oac ncontem- in tobacco shaping decisions leadership domestic purely More iaetsadterhr.Efrshv nldddseiaigdamning disseminating included have Efforts harm. their and cigarettes 3 h eut ntrso oenetrvnehave revenue government of terms in results The 1 nti eysm eid however, period, same very this In MKN MN DOCTORS AMONG SMOKING 2 nteery1980s, early the In regulat- 11 Downloaded By: [Stanford University] At: 21:14 19 February 2008 12 nteohrhn,wa a edsoee bu oipltclformation, sociopolitical about discovered be may things.’’ and what ‘‘men hand, gov- simply other of of the analysis lines an the On along that of gendered meant be role never should Foucault ernmentality the course, Of highlight sym- 2002). Louie I social, 2001; for Shilling particular, 1994; productive In Scheper-Hughes and 1988; 2001). by (Csordas ways formation produced the political embodiment: be and to bolic, to focus comes special giving corporality by that so do I problematized. and n bet scnign ncnutspolmtzto,tewy tgets it and ways redirection the regulation, problematization, critique, conduct’s study, The on to 1991:93–94). contingent subjected people, authority-making, is (Foucault of buttress objects suturing things’’ the entities and how and analyzing political entails ‘‘men non-State level second managing and State by gov- how of themselves analyses on inhabitants, its focus with and concern ernmentality territory formal controlling more by sovereignty’s itself studying suturing sustaining to people contrast relationships managing In for long-term objects. techniques and to excavating at authority-making involves analysis of around modes first centered multilayered has The inquiry levels. of realm ‘‘Governmen- two moment this essay from of Foucault’s do much by people (1991), Informed week. tality’’ which to that week recently conduct, from have of moment, academy to ways the new of on corridors focusing several been from politics of Researchers death is tobacco-related processes among cigarettes. of conduct of set to consumption third of their a problematization exposed specifically that and doctors, article creation this are in considering—the here who worth argue I among today 2007). prominent (Kohrman 2004). memory-making residents of (Kohrman style smoker past distinctive Chinese individual a exposure in the entails tobacco sets onto second for The production two responsibility displace of move chronicled helps a regimes have that self, from age risk-conscious I the our so. of to fashioning common less the others involves One PRC, publications. the of boarders neet.Teaayia i fti ril xed ute,hwvr also I however. manufacturers’ further, of extends appreciation wide-scale cigarette scholarly article of expand this serves to engine of Chinese seek blame-making an aim among analytical as such The blamed prevalent interests. ways being become and is conduct has suffering, that smoking how cigarette physicians, see why (also describe formation self of 1999). practices Rose 1999; and Dean norms, discourses, institutions, ueospoessaea ok oeqiepeaetbyn the beyond prevalent quite some work, at are processes Numerous ntepgsblw oenetlt rmwr stpe ohelp to tapped is framework governmentality a below, pages the In .KOHRMAN M. OENETLT NADOTIETECLINIC THE OUTSIDE AND IN GOVERNMENTALITY means male ywihcnuti created is conduct which by moiet(Bourdieu embodiment = rpoiiinby prohibition or Downloaded By: [Stanford University] At: 21:14 19 February 2008 h r hs mkn aisntbigcraldb ihrtedoctors’ the either by curtailed being not habits smoking smokers? heavy these become are have cigarettes Why by wrought devastation away familial time and exhausting their and of long much cigarettes. labor spend smoking usually disease, patients apparent who tobacco-related from an surgeons, eradicate by the enveloped to be of days would into all I and conduct. Nearly and rooms of surgeons irony. hospital form these clinic-based patients’ specific offices, their a duty from this in their away involved step developing regularly surgeons would are these we of they Whenever began most that that and issues: I male other about two are patients by after intrigued with became I Shortly communicating research, disease, were toxicity. tobacco-related most specialists, the treating tobacco’s cancer of in some lung involved tobacco, namely in professionals invested medical greatly city iconic a in including how, understanding care, expert for surgery. referred form chest usually venues recognized and are widely chemotherapy medical most disease) primary (the research, tobacco-related cancer the lung of this are with diagnosed they for people of because where surgery province departments cardiothoracic frequented such southwestern have choosing of I the industry. tobacco of departments research socio- current the This capital China’s hospital-based and of fieldwork. Kunming, center tobacco a recent examining in and study Yunnan my disease broader by a of of incited part politics less as 2003 no in been began has it habits, 2000). Llewellyn 1999; al. Hackett et also ‘‘ration- Walshe see to (2002:164; 2001; relates rule’’ conduct of been physician ‘‘mentalities setting, has and clinical alities’’ focus the primary inside the how, outlines, glean to Flynn that as Within governmentality.’’ oeuvre, litera- suffering’s ‘‘clinical congnitivist small called from relatively been the recently away Consider has what making overlooked. on blame ture been of direct has problematization to sources to the serve political-economic relationships how can their Likewise, bodies and managed. clinicians clinicians’ and Evans- embodiment, which generated male through (e.g., are alone terrain things unique let making a corporeality, be blame how aca- can explored within investigating few have however, circles date, Lock is To demic 2001; 1995). Good Greenhalgh Nor 1992; Farmer (e.g., 1937; 1987). encounter Pritchard clinical Martin the comes of 1998; it side when patient’s especially the anthropologists, to medical and for provocation new nothing meaningful certainly men? as as wording men literal examining his by treat kind in we respond if ask, can we o ol tb htpyiin ofeunl xoe otebiological the to exposed frequently so physicians that be it could How in interested was I wards, surgery cardiothoracic visiting began I When smoking doctors’ in interest my buoyed have issues analytical these If is conduct and embodiment gendered of interplay the Investigating MKN MN DOCTORS AMONG SMOKING 13 Downloaded By: [Stanford University] At: 21:14 19 February 2008 rbeaiaini urnl en xeine mn oeo yinfor- my of that some effect among analyzed. what experienced is in to mants and being clinicians how currently professionals’ finally, among care is some And health problematization next. embodiment of outlined how male is problematization smoking recent and cigarette of The use offered. Then, details is cigarette provided. China are of Next, hospitals genealogy Chinese in a discussed. cigarettes tobacco- use initially currently with physicians patients diseases—are treat regularly related who those smoke—particularly recent who cigarette that from away highlights culpability conduct it divert bodily to producers. doctors’ more, helped inside inadvertently, regulate things What’s albeit to of have, efforts order contexts. and the tobacco-control time clinical sustaining transnational some for quite outside pivotal for contention as and of understood sites been been have have China in physicians fasqec feet n h omlo xetdresult.’’ expected or normal the and result events actual of the sequence between a ‘‘incongruity of an as irony defines Merriam-Webster historically, degree, some to always, are professionals of practicalities. that sense institutionally, specific us making more reminds for illuminates It and heuristics prominence governmentality ongoing of the tobacco’s value of the terms demonstrate in generating? increasingly today what is have tobacco And problematization that habits? suffering such human practitioners’ might medical effects raising China’s busy broader Who been about has study? perhaps, questions of presuppositions that similar line very to underlay those apposite necessary by might anthropologically equally animated presuppositions else, more is What it ostensibly issues. that and me of initial to set clear another became consider it epigraph, article’s this apt particularly a anthropology. be medical to began seem for fieldwork might to inquiry they my obligations of readers, as some line broader mulled for I their blush that first or questions on and, data the were risk Such relevant health? public and disease to exposure 14 nwa supin sta xetto rudd tlatfu ei note. merit four least At diseases— grounded? interests. expectation tobacco that tobacco-related against is agitate assumptions like and what treat On smoking those cigarette especially regularly from doctors—and abstain who that would is surgeons result expected cardiothoracic an doubt, no ers, yaayi nod sflos omnmsocpin bu doctors about misconceptions Common follows. as unfolds analysis My eo,teeprle rcso nur r use.Sc aalls helps parallelism Such pursued. are inquiry of tracks parallel these Below, as serves that editorial the as such materials on stumbling after However, .KOHRMAN M. and oaooilypoue.I xoe httebde of bodies the that exposes It produced. somatosocially IPNIGWT IRONY WITH DISPENSING 4 o ayread- many For Downloaded By: [Stanford University] At: 21:14 19 February 2008 t ik.Atral nmn at ftewrdteeaesgiiatrtsof rates significant are there world professionals the of care parts health many among about is in data smoking structure scientific all, there of always After because will accredited, risks. behavior else, a rationalized stay its anyone exclude than and to highly more conduct become personal they, by their that to assume abide behavior to must reason and no professionals then thinking smok- to and of these comes tobacco modes it as when about Inasmuch actors knowledge risk-avoiding ing. risk rational, as acquire behave China to seamlessly in surgeons situated such that uniquely idea the are with begin Let’s wanting. is assumptions somatosocial— or negative). mini- or biochemical (positive behavior inducements—e.g., knowledge a than is any trail- other doctors health by public among affected but smoking healers mally cigarette simply (abstention). finally, not action And be personal to techni- blazers. into encouraged opt with are risk outfitted will they about adequately Third, knowledge they are transform today their danger, to doctors to tobacco’s ques Second, owing about smoke. tobacco; to knowledge to not comes to it consummate exposure most when the privileged actors of risk-avoiding some rational, doctors makes of profile vocational their First, ntedcdso aadcmnigtehzrso oac,dt hthave that methods. data abstract tobacco, conceptually of but hazards rigorous confidence the through more, documenting produced their than data been rather that of less, maintain decades them informants the gives in times my at of job epis- Many the specialized in highly control. hurdle conceptual tobacco more a of perhaps China, in manage, temology comparative today to professionals forced exam- such other are closer any But surgeons than on cardiothoracic see 1990). that we Lukes is Tambiah what and ination notwithstanding, 2001; Hollis practicalities (Feng 2001; Slovic theoretical settled Dawes and 1976; from and far Hastie Sahlins 1994; theory—is 1982; Shapiro choice entirely and rational humans Green of which 2005; tenets to the degree to the conform actors—regarding rational on debate nweg bu ikit mkn btnin n a la hswt the with this glean can One abstention. smoking into more epidemiological risk transform the about to intermittently techniques knowledge toward with disease. outfitted incredulity lung are adequately are for of China factor past—they risk sense leading a a the as feel tobacco negligibly in documenting to data were abstract smoke explain, who they and cancer second-hand lung prompted, smoked of to segment never knowledge distinct exposed anecdotal reg- previously but surgeons’ small pits who of a that patients—those Because with empirical of another. competition encounters array of one empirical wide a form ular against a a is information with by statistical This contact me, and regular cases. tell their cancer by they lung them corroded, on is forced data competition the in confidence ls xmnto fcritoai ugr eel htec fthese of each that reveals surgery cardiothoracic of examination Close vnmr neal steasmto htcritoai ugosin surgeons cardiothoracic that assumption the is untenable more Even 5 MKN MN DOCTORS AMONG SMOKING n h ogtnigacademic longstanding the and 6 Their 15 Downloaded By: [Stanford University] At: 21:14 19 February 2008 ugostdycgrtesoigi eairol iial fetdby affected minimally forces. only somatosocial behavior a or is biochemical smoking cigarette today surgeons dispensed, drugs completed, procedures occupied. beds from past and department’s ‘‘revenue,’’ each on gross based 90 bonuses accoun- quarter’s Every the seniority. hospital calculate by is accountants calibrated the it bonuses, days, recently, monthly physicians’ fieldwork far facili- set conducting and the who been In tants ‘‘salary’’ have 2000). from Chen I and income where Liu, ties monthly (Liu, receive ‘‘bonuses’’ their departmental physicians of from hospital-based hospital-based more percentage era, of modest Maoist a system the only compensation unlike the ways Now, revamped the physicians. been has has the transnationally important among party-state Of most vision perhaps come the 1996). disciplinary years, energy; recent that Hurt has in intensify their surgeons 2000; to Chinese biomedicine (Hæger serving of forces mission of structural much disciplinary various part surgery’s development devote in define stems the surgeons doubt to no prevention, most how disease like how from issues on is time little recuper- this spending postoperative to initial That comes directing ation. and it proce- out medications, when carrying treatment-based prescribing options, a dures, that intervention from weighing far evidence tests, stray ordering extensive regularly playbook: surgeons offering local world health promoting the access. remain in to uptake settings efforts consulting smoking complex avoid require and or often quit and hotlines, to find to manuals, how hard people Moreover, instruct that nicotine-replacement bupropion. services as and of such bereft therapy remains by medications country ignored the smoking-cessation long of marketplace well-proven majority a vast fill the to companies, open- and multinational new patents seize foreign-controlled to Despite in manufacturers facilities. pharma ings medical domestic China’s from by entirely efforts (either smoking recent laws banning comprehensive local) to or led yet national from not pressures have and control tobacco-free, contem- avoidance tobacco of entirely transnational smoking much are across make workplaces case Few to the China. policies from porary and far remains tools that with convenient, awash relatively are parts world some the Whereas landscape. of tobacco-control the of consideration briefest 16 is oeac o n hnadpnec otepyhatvsfudin (Benowitz found narcotics psychoactives addictive the most of to the irrespective dependency develop of that 2001). a one can is then nicotine, anyone especially and matter most tobacco, for the exposure, tolerance of enough a cigar- fact with first that The residence, grip people. biochemical and the over vocation underestimate have to can easy too ettes all is it smokers, ieiemsuddi h ulspoiinta hni oe oChinese to comes it when that supposition dual the is misguided Likewise many find to pressed hard are we assumption, third the Regarding .KOHRMAN M. 7 o ayosreswoaenon- are who observers many For Downloaded By: [Stanford University] At: 21:14 19 February 2008 o ogsit tdsswiigu hae frcrs u tist avoid in participate to course, stairs of and run members; with family records; day their per of sit and communications patients, sheaves weeks; staff, hallway up hour fellow innumerable on writing 60–100 surgical carry work desks elevators; formal to at slow start expected stints they are long moment They for the retirement. of from to expectations exertion training intellectual multiple ethical exceeds manage far and and work navigate physical their also but must success, They surgeons’ com- competency. the exceptionally cer- for is have knowledge vital surgeons biomedical tainly abstract These Understanding years. lives. professional two plex past the over surgeons extra-ward and intra- nurture to to gen- initiates; and for of alliances. passage blend relationships; of a rites mentor-disciple by facilitate build stratified to ways: seniority; units is four and as China in accreditation, working der, functions in set departments smoking surgery embodied surgical radical’’ cigarette keep highly which roles, to ‘‘free-floating a many through in its random ethics Among element and a manifest. pivotal practices being a organizational is from of It far surgeons. Chinese is among today cigarette The present’’ the of ‘‘history now. a and write here discuss to the will know because there—in I first specialties first men? China, must vocational among question one in smoking do How second orientation surgery—facilitate how raise. the androcentric case, to And an present important others? are the on or questions taken doctors two among smoking least at cigarette case, has the being That o,i rdsoe e ocnuecgrte n oe oaodthem. avoid to who than women often and shaping cigarettes more in consume And to role world. men the persistent predisposes around it and contexts not, significant 1.6 innumerable a in only smokes plays whereas It smoke, 2005:404). professionals. al. clinicians et that (Jiang male found do times also of clinicians 35 surveyors female percent physicians The of percent male doctors. 48 female with surgery, than gender: variable within smoke is significant to smoke most Disease likely among doctors single for more if Centers smoking the China’s that predicting of by indicates for survey out Prevention carried 2004 and cities China A Control six in organized. in lives people’s physicians heavily which hospital are somato- around the axis elsewhere also bodily and but specific biochemical a the consider of social, inducements by influenced heavily l hshsbe aecera aeitrce ihcardiothoracic with interacted have I as clear made been has this All edrsifuneo mkn s fcus,ntlmtdt medical to limited not course, of is, smoking on influence Gender’s just not is surgeons Chinese among smoking cigarette that appreciate To IAET MKN MN HNS UGOSTODAY SURGEONS CHINESE AMONG SMOKING CIGARETTE MKN MN DOCTORS AMONG SMOKING 17 8 Downloaded By: [Stanford University] At: 21:14 19 February 2008 ore r tutrdaon yd ral icltn cosCiasuch China across circulating broadly efficient dis- dyads as infused these around ethically of structured of most are set Today, courses conduct. shifting professional and about sweeping discourses wide that regulatory a surveillance the by and communication refuge, guided communication constant are a of of transpire forms as site The serving a surveillance. and is Beyond mutual naps significantly, and shifts. more after-lunch overnight perhaps enjoy on office, to duty those surgeons for Duty for day. rests beds and lunch longer night bunk takes both have beverages, during to rests usually and access offices seeks dinner), has and surgeon office, breakfast cardiothoracic duty often the (and the in hospital, patients the from refuge Within roost. important an ways. bodies strenuous upper and their delicate using hours, extraordinarily for in stand they wherein surgeries, challenging 18 a enepandt etruhahgl moidsto edrrhetorics, gender of set cardi- embodied highly of a ranks this through often, me staff Most to complex. the explained quite been among be has the to common that appears fact departments more surgery The not othoracic female. as conducted is as self-identify have colleagues physician’’ nurses I the by where ‘‘female all wards recognized fieldwork, surgery is my cardiothoracic of and most two self-identifies the one in And but male. all China, in met convivial sionate nsria ad,nre,hv sal enepce ob eaeand female be to expected been usually ways. have feminine in employees nurses, themselves be of comport rung’’ to wards, ‘‘lower expected reputedly surgical are the whereas ward on such, a the as Evenden such perform also and marked in (see male China Surgeons deeply in 1995). ward Morantz-Sanchez domination—has surgical 1998; the of is that means environment hierarchal and male today. script, of China across performative binary doctors school, among sexual uptake medical smoking for with The program through one training Along same surgical record very a success? the into track their is admission for strong in predictor greatest play a the perhaps cigarette and the curiosity does role intellectual what And ‘‘generous’’ them? a nearby. making first others without to office pull pack duty to the the someone smoking. signifi- in of for up more rare offering cigarette light is far and It is but pack hour. office a an office out duty dozens often the duty there, in exchanged the consumed cantly, simply in men- not of already activity are As choreography Cigarettes near-constant space. subtle surrounding a a and tioned, entailing highly pockets, diaphragm, else: movement lips, something bodily fingers, includes of always forms almost mannered interact and them, navigate ihsc nehutn ceue ti nupiigta h uyofc is office duty the that unsurprising is it schedule, exhausting an such With h on hslnsaeo eia rcie htatat n repels and attracts What practice? medical of landscape this joins Who .KOHRMAN M. = nestv.I h uyofc,tewy ugosdpo hs dyads, these deploy surgeons ways the office, duty the In insensitive. = nolga,methodical uncollegial, = nfiin,independent inefficient, = eaea siidscooiia difference, sociopolitical ossified female—as = lpy modern sloppy, = emoine,masterful team-oriented, 9 ftecritoai ugosIhave I surgeons cardiothoracic the Of = akad n compas- and backward, = incompetent, Downloaded By: [Stanford University] At: 21:14 19 February 2008 tqet,adadsr osz pmr ul h e rie.Te lodo also of They trainee. sense new a the friendliness, produce fully and of more masculinity offering up out perform size frequently observed, to to this begin have desire a to I young and this, doctors the etiquette, docile do arrival, senior surgeons On They the and expect heads. of cigarettes. can usually friendly rest advisor the student develop the the also graduate which Once but across to department, advisor, study. the surgeons their obliged graduate in only senior are not supervise of with to students numbers relationships accredited small master formally the admitted, are of who one country to surgery cardiothoracic apply of vocation lucrative must is increasingly talk.’’ up there the to in office, start open interested duty can are the we people in woman, man together, a a it’s to eat being If next men that. we sleep just to and That’s talk, nothing smoke below. I and we If above together. smoke, bunks men on We sleep we easier. chest, with ward someone’s much the in is together ‘‘Working further: men explains Zhou Dr. As surgeons. icg,ad()i sfrmr wwr o‘gtaogwt’ ( with’’ along ‘‘get be patient’s to a awkward to open more far hold need is can it fails, surgeons (c) retractor and a cardiothoracic ribcage, if who, (b) women people such time, ‘‘strong’’ impede especially adequate often have obligations committing surgeons these ‘‘family’’ (a) cardiothoracic from with colleagues female because older admit line ranks to disinclined few their In are into they a men. tones, self-satisfied than especially with in me, as as more told together and marked precepts, out transgressive times other carried as at and years when while many suspect China, for sexually coded in been women has young modern, below, for further discussed smoking As commu- smoke cigarette assessment. smoke-infused mutual to in and engaged surgeons camaraderie, periods away nications, extensive cardiothoracic hours spend femi- among to to long and repellent pressure find cigarettes such they the that involves clear work respectability that make to also nine on ill-suited and They feel home. demanding and (while they family physically because from they students surgeon so me ward is a medical tell be that wards) to female want surgery never and cardiothoracic would and through distinctive nurses smoke, rotations highly Many expected commitment, a month-long be of domestic conduct. might terms exertion, as in sexual science’’ physical more soft of and and ‘‘hard 1988) phenomenology of Traweek terms 1999; in (Oldenziel less framed set a ihseilatningvnt atcpns oilsau n h understood the and will status present, more social immediately or men participants’ all one to to that smoke given a expected attention and offer is special and it performativity cigarettes with of dialogue, pack male in a out engage of pull to feature wish and ritualized another highly and guanxi basic a become feigacgrteis cigarette a Offering and training M.D. their from graduation approach who students Medical mkn cosCia nms etns hnvrmnecutreach encounter men whenever settings, most In China. across -making fayan ltrly ‘odsrbt smoke’’). distribute ‘‘to (literally, guanxi MKN MN DOCTORS AMONG SMOKING sca relationships). (social xiangchu Fayan female ) has 19 Downloaded By: [Stanford University] At: 21:14 19 February 2008 aeaottewy that ways the about date h einstbcoidsr n eas otlclsoesare smokers leaf. Yunnan local of taste most that the male, prefer because always they almost that individuals, and known non-ward The it industry making for in tobacco admiration unabashed of out region’s by brands, touted offered almost most the cigarettes physicians, Yunnan’s The from departmental daily. drawn between are through exchanged always pass those but are ward as the outsiders, on work the not further by do is amplified, gender not and if ethics, revealed, professional comportment, of sociopolitics ing, smoke. gradu- and male in among join desire mutual to the the of amplifies students of members greatly ate sense senior this other accrued surprisingly, the Not and during the mentor ward. develop the are can with students training, factors these graduate their that pivotal connection most and either conviviality, along the a respect, succeed find of To to hospital. some need high-quality will path, a programs. student at Ph.D. master preferably to a position, advanced approaches, staff are graduation and build such as for they often, apply relationships reciprocate More students the to Some on ward. dependent then the heavily and in are futures accept their to all, After desire the time, fayan over But smoke. a decline to students 20 adohrccsren h aeqeidaotti xetfroe elme tell one, for except this the about queried of the have cigarette All interactions. a I in these offering who for But surgeons by cardiothoracic especially purchased physician one foods. pack a begin expensive packaged with regularly an communications or also from daily will fruit their relatives of fresh male more research, of or conduct form I the where in wards common come quite is usually pr it gifts to care, relatives patients’ fine for exceptionally China for across desire or environ- respect, appreciation, professional changing quickly a subdivision such for with In slated nurturing developing, most years. ment, and 10 been how old next two has of the or surgery because within decade a part cardiothoracic only large departments discipline most in a relationship, as a quickly decline threatening to equip- loath thereby medical often viduals, and are drug Surgeons of companies. representatives ment and administrators hospital are adr18;Yn19;Yn 94 n oalse ereabout degree lesser a to and 1994) Yang in 1996; Yan 1986; Walder about written been quality guanxi htsoigaogsren ss netie ihqetoso belong- of questions with intertwined so is surgeons among smoking That master for acceptable is it education, surgical of context the in Today, nte usd oreo iaetsi h aiiso ains oexpress To patients. of families the is cigarettes of source outside Another .KOHRMAN M. sal rw o e ries seilyi nesodt emale. be to understood if especially trainees, new for grows usually = utrlcdn ftecgrtepc en fee.Weesmc has much Whereas offered. being pack cigarette the of coding cultural mkn Wn 00 a 965–1,ltl a endsrbdto described been has little 1996:57–61), Yan 2000; (Wank -making guanxi guanxi fayan sse svtlee yteods fsurgeons. of oldest the by even vital as seen is fayan yCiashlr nrcn er Kpi 1997; (Kipnis years recent in scholars China by rmasno olau ysyn hyd not do they saying by colleague senior a from ok naaei medicine. academic in works fayan fe it odcos npbi,these public, In doctors. to gifts offer ietda ugosb epewho people by surgeons at directed fayan fayan otesurgeons the to rmsc indi- such from fayan srole ’s Downloaded By: [Stanford University] At: 21:14 19 February 2008 hp n esae ytemkn fmsuiiis(f,Mry2001). Merry (cf., masculinities of to making come the can by embodi- problematization shaped of and be processes production and particular on shape conduct’s eye how close as a and such keep to exam- ment, (Ferguson vital we time is when over it that 2002), unfolds is Gupta research governmentality’’ this ‘‘transnational in how acknowledged Something ine multi-state fully conduct. be and of inter- to problematization non-state, waiting and fully still state, production more the of (b) analyze practices and These entities the to 2004). (a) the need Walters between the to and dependencies recognize (Larner comes scholars media disseminate governmentality it capital, venture or invest when products, to looking market firms and Foucault multinational offices, to innumerable than NGOs their international nation-states, expansive from everything more transnational: the have credit, been constitute their might to generally much community scholars, statist any governmentality often greatly within recently, sciences’ More what adding social political. global of the for visions been and ahistorical previously productive had and transnational, what certainly to national, was nuance needed of approach regimes That minimally governance. supralocal relationships capillary to was within between also power connected interdependencies he conceptualize life, long-term to about eager on discourses often contingent and priorities, is administrative power institutions, attentive ways was frequently the Foucault career to his over Whereas 2003). Maurer and lk,i shlflt osdrfrtsm suso motnet recent to importance regulated of and produced be issues to vı comes some conduct placed how non-physician been specifically first has scale, focus spatial and consider growing on a physician literature, to that In men, helpful literature. governmentality is Chinese it as for develop alike, to significant came consumption so cigarette how something of question the addressing In non-surgical other in interviewed have the a is is I As ever to. if that encouraged rarely is physicians wards, nor female smokes colleagues, neither current with Lin hos- and Dr. full case cohort the male, a graduate are had as her whom have is recently of of I more pattern all rest years and the this few student Unlike to last graduate employee. the exception a pital over as one who observe The woman to young patient. opportunity lest only the coat, the white for Lin, their disregard Dr. of pocket a the approach signal in will cigarette they relatives the ritually placing patients’ recognize, and more to conversation or obliged eight a day for work them average the on that ´ s- -i lbllclrsosst vrrhn oipltcltnin (Perry tensions sociopolitical overarching to responses global-local aa-vis EELG FCGRTESMOKING CIGARETTE OF GENEALOGY A N EIA CONDUCT MEDICAL AND fayan ietda r Lin. Dr. at directed fayan MKN MN DOCTORS AMONG SMOKING hc h ugosuulyfeel usually surgeons the which , 21 Downloaded By: [Stanford University] At: 21:14 19 February 2008 22 iin hs oprt lyr ucl ahoe ibetcnqe omove compe- to about techniques (Cochran nimble anxious fashioned and enterprise quickly growth players family corporate massive these so-named for tition, opportunity their Seeing the through 1980). them and Company of Tobacco Brothers largest American the British Nanyang China, his through in Duke products to James began tobacco being investors rolled various sell forces, and these manufacture Tapping techniques capital. new finance incursion, and moving colonial manufacturing, for expanding in innovations including wrangling, forces, state-to-state large-scale body various of the come eras. to subsequent pertaining and fragments that from discursive attention indus- that cigarette special China’s and for merit when period developed) era pivotal (the first most 1900s early the try the century that is 16th suggest analysis the would our after became I starting women smoking 1992). degree China tobacco Wang lesser and 2004; in a CE (Brook to men 225 to and as by what men early among and as plants widespread occurred begin leafy have to to of when known Smoking is of matters. questions complicate the emphasize manhood, and smoking rette h iaet’ uno-h-etr pernei hn a ietout- direct a was China in appearance turn-of-the-century cigarette’s The ciga- together bound has China in what of history the plumbing When .KOHRMAN M. IUE1 FIGURE al 0hcnuycgrtepcaigadads. and packaging cigarette century 20th Early Downloaded By: [Stanford University] At: 21:14 19 February 2008 uto,ntdta hr s‘hrl aewl ntetw hti not is that town the in wall pro- bare tobacco a of posters.’’ hub ‘‘hardly flaming a the is become by south- there to brightened the yet that in had ads noted the which of duction, Kunming, observer of one instance, treaty city for eastern western 1910, China’s In beyond early. far quite reached ports ads graphic-rich Cigarette distributed, underestimated. be still widely then world: 1995). one the Gan was of and Liu, deployed much (Yi, they and advertising technique China visible for most novel people’s the between importantly Perhaps most and lips. circulation broad into products their aeoine dcp.Mr fe,hwvr aesoigwsframed was smoking highly male some however, in as often, visible More also marketed were copy. was messages personal ad and Those independence, male-oriented display cigarettes 2005). attractiveness, Barlow to of of (cf. privately forms wealth smoking and foreign-coded with individually the association done women, generally smoked be For something to were telos: 2). cigarettes how grand of (Figure expectation the the in of variations spirit distinctive breathing to the cigarettes of become the consumption literally China.’’ and ‘‘New the and through modernism, up’’ radical men more ‘‘light science, Chinese this larger ethics nation-state), health, encouraged of Chinese A the copy vitality, mix (i.e., heady manhood. imaginary to a public of emergent pertaining blending and erotics visions audience, Crafted and heteronormative palette. filial symbolic a to different pique to radically designed to copy a symbolically was advertising tapped however, and Some cigarette proportion, comportment 1). the male (Figure men of tie to imagery salubrious conventional habit tapped a as smoking h bqiyo uhavriig oto tdsge nSaga,cannot Shanghai, in designed it of most advertising, such of ubiquity The oehn lerfetdi d fteery2t etr etist highly to pertains century 20th early the of ads in reflected else Something cigarette portray to was advertising tobacco early China’s of priority A IUE2 FIGURE al 0hcnuycgrtepackaging. cigarette century 20th Early 10 MKN MN DOCTORS AMONG SMOKING 23 Downloaded By: [Stanford University] At: 21:14 19 February 2008 90 ce nse ihtbcoavries is,utltemid-1900s, the until male. were First, China advertisers. in practitioners tobacco medical with of majority step the in acted Shang- 1900s of majority vast (Diko the cigarettes pro- that smoking found cigarette was 1930s workforce the 1928, in b hai’s By out 87 domains, carried reached smokers. survey professional already a cigarette and other had China with like in filled medicine, duction that becoming encounter assume not there physician- to to Likewise, was solidify cigarette. begin reason a to to little proffering not eager by reason is intimacy were did and no who doctors trust, patrons is respect, China patient male there across of how Nonetheless, numbers clinics or cigarettes. increasing in advertising use that early degree to the to assume began unclear receptive remains they were it practitioners quickly vocation, medical specific which by domains to smoking on extra-kinship period and navigate this loyalty upheaval. to of of context bonds needed geopolitical nurture broader were to a public that within in bonds together did friendship, men something as u ucey euaemdclaceiain n eitrsnr tlsof styles sundry root Diko register to 1995; and (Brownell agencies practitioners state accreditation, medical nascent medical by regulate efforts quackery, and native escalating out and fidelity; services; by legitimacy cultural and scientific rescue to changes: knowledge to medicine’s modernist other claim biomedical for biomedicine’s of in between want rise competition host Chinese organic gradual a of national the framing enfeebled were science; symbolic an important the as PRC’s less eradication; ‘‘society’’ the no and and medicalization But efflorescence, opium’s 1949. nationalism’s in collapse, creation Dynasty’s Qing Chinese the cigarettes. with new promote smoothly to prompting deployed dovetailed being unfold often then to scripts which marketing 20th began doctors, early and for changes the wellbeing expectations interconnected during of many Fourth, tenets 1979:30–34). their century, overarching manage (Unschuld to with respectability also accordance but male others, in for care body-selves to own only not healers exhorted canon 24 blt oha,t nesadasrc nweg,adt comport ‘‘the to modernizing 1995). and Yip and that 2001; nation ways Xu the knowledge, in 2002; protecting so (Lo abstract to do people’’ to commitment understand also a but their articulated honorably, to simply and increasingly not compassionately heal, were illustrating themselves ways stripes to in all themselves of ability conduct practitioners to medical expected changes, being these all of h 0hcnuy elhcr xet nieadotieCiaregularly China outside and tobacco. inside of experts benefits care the health extolled century, 20th the h olwn atr ugs htpyiin uigtefrthl fthe of half first the during physicians that suggest factors following The from data scant of Because clinic. the was domain extra-kinship such One mn h hne fgets infcnewr ooilincursion, colonial were significance greatest of changes the Among .KOHRMAN M. 12 hr,frcnuis hn’ medical China’s centuries, for Third, ¨ tr19;Mri 04.I light In 2004). Morris 1992; tter linsik Ccrn1980:234), (Cochran sticks illion ¨ tre l 2004:202). al. et tter 11 eod before Second, Downloaded By: [Stanford University] At: 21:14 19 February 2008 ayise otl ‘iaet opn’ ofmle spr ftecoun- the of 1999:43–46). part (Li as 1970s system families and rationing to coupon 1960s larger the authorities coupons’’ initially try’s in ‘‘cigarette did cigarettes, also monthly only but priced issued dramatically, Not many inexpensively quite China. of then across and supply doc- incrementally vocations male domestic among other overall smoking the in of boost in tick men upward industry and the for tobacco tors key sprawling regional especially physi- of were China’s older actions 1950s the many nationalizing said by after They me disciplines. authorities to biomedical explained various as from increased, cians or practi- little medical changed either among rates smoked. rarely smoking doctors overall female new in because reduction tioners shift a personnel state-engineered to This 1988). nationalization, contributed (Evans gradual schools the ser- medical delivery and and care sky’’ health vices China’s the of Mao- half expansion to state-directed up part and hold in rationalization, thanks ‘‘women 1949, that after ideals Many doctors gender. as ist to certified stemmed pertaining and promises moves trained it on managerial were good Instead, women make and to efforts. supply party-state young tobacco anti-tobacco the in with of disruptions do occurred. post-1949 to practitioners initial medical nothing from that among had rates say drop smoking This to overall not in drop onward. is modest 1949 That from unchanged intervention. remained as or treated physicians be critique among ever to use significant begin was tobacco doctors after of among decades it smoking object several that did until an PRC Not evidence the recently. of little quite founding until is the such There as framed undesirable. strongly being as physicians infcto cosCia h is a nirsiuindiscourses antiprostitution the was crystallized discourses These first regime. Communist The new the cigarette China. by of promoted hardening dyadic across this fac- to Two and heavily womanhood. signification contributed sociability, to seem, even anathema performativity, would as coded it male increasingly tors, to marked became was vital commodity it as as that power, 1949 how after was forcefully it more of avoidance physicians’ into specialization. entry and women’s bureaucratization, opportunities campaigns, expansion, new medicine’s political sional to by riven structures, career climate employment and family social fostering a from everything amidst after not to doctors pertained reason male tensions managing For little such tensions. for 1949, sociopolitical had means enveloping vocations a by agitated as other nerves cigarettes entrenchment and using gendered medicine continue and in to established men well China, tobacco’s within given and access of h rvlneo mkn mn aepyiin fe 99 however, 1949, after physicians male among smoking of prevalence The a interviewees, my to according ‘‘liberation,’’ after decades first the During among smoking cigarette described not has genealogy brief this far, So oehn lectlzn aedcos s ftecgrteadwomen and cigarette the of use doctors’ male catalyzing else Something MKN MN DOCTORS AMONG SMOKING = iflscetdb profes- by created pitfalls 13 14 guanxi wn osc ease such to Owing n soothing and 25 Downloaded By: [Stanford University] At: 21:14 19 February 2008 o moyn tano aclnt euel togadslbiu for salubrious means and strong others. state-sanctioned of reputedly a being male masculinity well of into that the strain signify developed a helped via had embodying image communicated for cigarettes this Whether of interactions, future. everyday consumption nation’s or the media cigar- managing lit mass with hands Party, Communist in andro- Chinese largely ettes the Carol China’s regularity of of the members groups and leadership, image: was new centric Gonghuan a factor confronted who second (Yang people which women The with transgressive communication). young and personal sexuality—that Benedict, shameless westernized were with smoked conflation smoking ad-driven female pre-Revolutionary, of the by informed perspective—one f20.Ide,fwohrmisra ei tm htIhv eng ofar so spring go the seen the during have in I appeared found articu- that what one items it the media of as mainstream that extreme other 18th outer physicians few the Indeed, the Chinese 2005. of on of toward day is contempt the essay the 2005, the 31, is lates, of article May terms this on In for published epigraph NTD. was the the which during editorial from circulating of That editorial items drawn. anticipation the media is in the campaign of 2005 mounted example the surveys and curious nearly particularly May statistical items, A late antitobacco referenced event. with in which studded convention, of was Following media all China’s NTD. Chinese 2005, 18th June WHO’s early among the date masculinity of to theme point and turning tobacco decisive most of That the uneventful. problematization was physicians. fairly out, the turns seem it for probably as would NTD, NTD year’s year. 2005 the the outlets of media campaigns, times regional other and rarity May a national late items, From China’s coverage. antismoking of media disseminated majority mass have the its June, been fea- early has visible event most to the the annual thereafter, ‘‘celebrate’’ this year to of Each began ture (NTD). government Day of central Tobacco the onset No spring of WHO’s formal the branches in The when occurred earlier. 1988, millen- control of tobacco decade new transnational the a with until surfaced involvement China PRC had across antecedents visible key become nium, medi- not among did use practitioners cigarette cal problematizing interventions health public While 26 oefrieyta iiesars h onr ild ieie thereby likewise, do increase. will margins profit country doctors’ the and rise across rates citizens disease making that furtively hope ‘elhPoesoasAantTbco cinadAses’wsthe was Answers’’ and Action Tobacco, Against Professionals ‘‘Health spring perennial these of decades two nearly after observers, most To .KOHRMAN M. iyDaily City 15 PROBLEMATIZATION hc lista hscaswosmoke who physicians that claims which , Downloaded By: [Stanford University] At: 21:14 19 February 2008 rbe o oac oto nCia u oepeiey‘‘the (407). a precisely advancement simply more its not but for China, constitutes in issue’’ male smoking control among such tobacco smoking that for cigarette problem express about they narratives First, normative physicians. gender’’ of researchers set being The a however. its communicates, proffer factor publication in this important that messages articulated only most survey doc- the Chinese the 2005:403). with among al. in of smoking high, et physicians of findings (Jiang extremely rate 600 key is ‘‘The out surveyed are: The tors following It publication carried China. and CDC. journal Health was of 2005 (CDC), U.S. of Prevention cities study the Institutes and six by National This Control U.S. established Disease the above. protocols for like from Centers mentioned funding items China’s with one media by by 2004 2005, in referenced spring often in so surveys the same the underwrites Zhang what across amok, (2001). visibility run masculinity’’ manhood gaining ‘‘entrepreneurial capitalist specter termed control. of has popular notion tobacco gendered the broader highly China: for post-Mao a at corrosive taps of, is it physicians matter Finally, emphasizes among and a responsibility, smoking of as breach that and clinicians thinking individual among failed context, once, consumption broader cigarette factor, characterizes contributing ‘‘back- woefully other the as any China nations, and in overlooking ‘‘developed’’ situation And current of credible. the misguided ward.’’ iconographic portray scientifically the to most as States, physicians the just United of perhaps than indictment references statisti- its cites more It frame editorial The to of article. research this representa- of consists cal of outset the cocktail cocktail at described heady That assumptions a ciga- NTD, of tropes. deploys 2005 mention any editorial the tional Skirting the surrounding includes. and media manufacturers, occludes mass it rette what the of of terms in portion both large a with much addsuso fmdrit‘dvlpet’tlooyadsynchronic and States. teleology United the ‘‘development’’ from derived modernist statistics smoking of discussion ward h .. h eea mkn aetdyi t2 ecn,adtert among rate the in and instance, percent, 25 For (403). at are declines. percent is doctors else 9 today among is rate everyone smoking smoking doctors of general of rates have the rates the U.S., the tobacco the then first and controlling key: down be experience brought to following successful the with found countries Developed the not are built are they which upon statistics the and findings These cocktail representational same this nearly that is interesting Equally shares it for formulaic, quite also is editorial this outlandish, However = iyDaily City rhsoy tucniinlybae otr o hi iaet use, cigarette their for doctors blames unconditionally it history, or dtra.Cnie h otfeunl eeecdsurvey referenced frequently most the Consider editorial. 16 hyepanti nasmwa awk- somewhat a in this explain They MKN MN DOCTORS AMONG SMOKING otpivotal most 27 Downloaded By: [Stanford University] At: 21:14 19 February 2008 i rhrattdnlhsiiyfrta eairwih hn c triggers (c) then, spawns which, (b) behavior (203). dangers that it for behavior’s terminate to hostility a person attitudinal per- the about a her (a) knowledge or behavior: within his of individual logic and acquisition established cognition son’s ostensibly regarding male sciences an Chinese research health chided disregarding their the they for of particular, critique personnel In withering medical rare. (203). a is with ‘‘irresponsibility’’ (quitting) the change concluded about subjects’ behavioral conviction authors actual personal study’s and today, modest The high is quitting quite about study’s of is knowledge merits The smoking though cities. even of physicians, largest dangers male province’s the among the that of are findings six nearly key from in data physicians detailed hospital group collected a it 1,000 by researchers, Yunnan science in health and conducted Kunming male Coincidentally health, of 2004). smoking, examined al. about study et (Wang behavior’’ This quitting and 2005. attitudes, NTD ‘‘knowledge, of doctors’ anticipation in their published abrogating report, this practitioners failure, 407). frame medical (403, individual and to duty’’ from world’’ and given stems ‘‘responsibility the emphasis professional that in primary one country a being any with male as of China’s embarrassment the among highest facili- national smoking the and medical of are rates in marketing, ‘‘the smoking physicians that company banning bemoan legislation instead tobacco enforced ties—they is strictly formation, homosocial doctors of sociocultural career entrenched absence male of forces—including among for of not use variables multiplicity strategies culpability, tobacco these a use that and by to noting misconduct complicated quick than of also Rather narrative are production. a surveyors build the analysis, to their in level 28 rae fet ih hs artvshv oa ntbcocnrlin control based? tobacco been on has study today my have what where And city narratives narratives? the these the in Kunming, to might smokers responded of effects what surgeons ardent these By broader most of surgeons? the some cardiothoracic of have Chinese some means of problematiza- establishment, tobacco lives medical of daily China’s moves the earlier with and squared these tion have how years, recent In to demonstrated distinction). authors right this the researched though individual they (even that health an evidence to right instead no public transnational a privileging over disseminated by smoke recently discourse parrying tobacco-control conceptually for physicians iia artvsaevsbei e nte nraigyctdsurvey cited increasingly another yet in visible are narratives Similar education and gender as such variables to attentive are they Although .KOHRMAN M. ALDQISADBEYOND AND QUITS FAILED 17 htsmr,teatoscsiaemale castigate authors the more, What’s Downloaded By: [Stanford University] At: 21:14 19 February 2008 rnfrain nesodb yifrat hog oiyiim of idioms bodily through informants my by understood transformations n ihdcosi umn,Irrl aehdayn ely‘‘individual smoke. deploy they anyone why meet- had hours for of have rationale hundreds rarely a my world I as In the Kunming, rights’’ China. with in in odds doctors smoke at with who also ing know are I They doctors outset. the article’s a of this of assumptions at the deployment discussed of I intellectual some that repackage an simply through tobacco-control not it framework—do disregarding rights-based parrying purposely actively and are discourse doctors (2004)—that authors ocutwudlkl ee oa ‘h eainhpo eft h self,’’ the to self of relationship ‘‘the as what in to transformations refer encouraging likely of would discourse consequence and Foucault tobacco-control unintended contempt fully of more the Indeed, embody mix men. had to as a self-worth floundering feel their repeated cardi- and to smokers their come Kunming’s as conduct had on their 2004 about clinicians fatalism their they by of many wards because unable, surgery quitting, significant, othoracic been turnstile less No with have quits. institutional experiences durable physicians this successful, China into in these transform tobacco available of tools to quitting majority of bemoan, paucity vast deeply the smoking so and of today—the become office, intensification has duty plays the dosing the tobacco corporeality, nicotine within that collective how roles their workday, into manifold their habituated the of several are course for times which the Yet in of at have struggle. least worthy bodily whom the thus extra-vocational smoking reasons—not of self-oriented, and view own individually, to many their come and of professionals, also institutionally numerous have In these problematic on smoking, expect. as quit through years to to careers come recent their as had advanced far in it so nicotine words, went the other few physiology a their than denying spaces. occasions, more long-established administrative their and to breaking other habit, in and open smoking interested offices increasingly areas became restricted duty also then to throughout Many informants smoking clinical up on-the-job My the hospitals. went their in Kunming most signage example, of For Smoking’’ patients 2004). ‘‘No (Kohrman imperatives mid-1990s initiatives encounter Yunnan to biopolitical tobacco-control NTD, begun already 2005 formal had other WHO’s surgeons the cardiothoracic and including before urbanites years control several have modernity, I tobacco regarding engagement As growing rationalities. transnational China’s or post-Mao logics with of any because as elsewhere, experience about have bodily written of ever terms if in rarely much should so. but people done products, why informants for tobacco medical my rationale buying of a continue any such to invoke allowed years be recent in marketers ogiiitcam uha hs utmnindb agadco- and Wang by mentioned just those as such claims Congnitivist nta,Ihv er n bevdohrrsoss fe ecie as described often responses, other observed and heard have I Instead, = MKN MN DOCTORS AMONG SMOKING 18 niiulpolmtzto of problematization individual aehadCieetobacco Chinese heard have I 29 19 Downloaded By: [Stanford University] At: 21:14 19 February 2008 o vr2 er,hdti osyi h itro 2004: of winter the in say to Kunming this in had surgeon years, a Ma, 20 Dr. over inadequacy. for male and weakness, addiction, 30 npriua,anme fte a enthe seen had them profession. their of at number directed a being 2005, particular, hostility June new In early the during by them nonplussed to were talked most I When responding? been informants r i,a3-erodsren codmn ftevie er nwards on heard I there. voices the communicated of indictments many summer: echoed the that surgeon, by 36-year-old a disturbed Lin, not Dr. if confused deeply e ik h ol atta?Imsl mitrse nqitn neand once quitting in interested am myself and I that smoking that? Does keep want all. will I for people would hope Why doctors sick. that get claim this understand don’t I chest-surgeon my have how NTD, 2005 the of wake the in recently, More then and medi- quit, and I techniques So, other here. willpower of available my is heard that I’ve all like worthless. on nothing are but drawing quit cines, can, of you I help out tried to as or I’ve sold best and hospital as painful, the been discomfort from all ( that have away with quits trips cope These business conference. to a on for been thing. country useful I’ve the stack pretty when a a or facing is iday or nicotine addicted, surgery Once complex night. me a at helping for 10:30 times preparing paperwork at of when energizing, times attention colleagues at my soothing, my focus times of at most helpful, extremely office, our duty of department the director my The into of here. walk smoking. chair doctor I are a The whenever to being smokes. I And of am party-secretary what smokes. part But The big ill. smokes. seriously a fall and hospital such I dangerous if is are family cigarettes Smoking my that for do? know ruinous I be times. could they numerous that quit to tried have I oeptet ee ev o oeta ecnpsil elwt.As Kunming, with. in deal hospitals top possibly other can the any of we most need than a and don’t hospital more contracted certainly this have got we at members And We’ve know, don’t. family you here. I or patients cancer? they lung more them like telling disease and horrible day after day elwa.Adta’ marsigaddsiiig tlae edsutdwith disgusted me me makes leaves just It quit dispiriting. but to and be, myself. trying embarrassing might But that’s Others right? And enough. strong, weak. be strong feel to not supposed just are I’m Men fail. me. I not then and try I difficult. cigarettes proffering circumstances? politely such is under everyone quit and a hospital] the ( [to here back get yili fayan htswym utatmt aeotnbgndrn pigFsia hol- Festival Spring during begun often is have smoking attempts quit job, my why pressure-filled That’s a such with truth, the you tell to And htsprilywy ttemmn,Idntpa oqi gi on tstoo It’s soon. again quit to plan don’t I moment, the at why, partially That’s .KOHRMAN M. .Ta’ l n a o eedo n’ iloe.ToeCieeherbs Chinese Those willpower. one’s on depend do, can one all That’s ). —olaus uevsr,ptet’rltvs o a noesustain anyone can How relatives. patients’ supervisors, )—colleagues, iyDaily City oraittikIejystigdw ihpeople with down sitting enjoy I think journalist iyDaily City dtra n were and editorial ... aiya! ... I Downloaded By: [Stanford University] At: 21:14 19 February 2008 elh n fteeifrat h is e ntefl f20,D.Liang, Dr. later: 2003, years of fall two public the say in of met to first erosion this I an who had informants NTD consequence: these 2005 of unintended One the another health. that promoting highlighted be have may informants clinical my defensiveness, defensiveness. vocational response: discourse) different tobacco-control a Lin embodying Dr. triggering fully through been mediated at has (as failings NTD past 2005 plausible, the colleagues’ actually that is and is quit salient a sense more maintaining among renewed seems that a unfold what men emboldening to these than began among Rather confidence a which 1990s. of self, to the to way during self clinicians positive of male normatively relationship any the in of redirection contributing are discourse attendant l hspbiiyadcnento bu otr smoking doctors about condemnation and publicity this All such voicing when occasion one than more on that is disturbing Equally its and NTD 2005 the that discern to hard is it Lin, Dr. do. when to we offices what Listening duty that’s our and in rule away in the hide seen That’s patients We never smoke. our it. I’ve to do But of that. hospital need front do this we in China on in smoke in here Out doctors we doctor some No. do any that Smoking And smoke? read No I’ve hospital. to around, rooms? this look their people here, over in telling all but are earlier we everywhere, signs are Are doctors ads here them? tobacco by street, gotten sell the quit they’ve we Do to time usually cigarettes? told the we by been And because already disease. complied. quit, they’ve their they’ve patients to and of department, our them cause tell our tell regularly major to to I the have and been don’t colleagues has my smoking Here, them. that smoking. treat to of cardiothoracic cancer, dangers in lung beds with enough people have especially don’t patients, just away we turn because to have frequently we o ulchat?I hsgo o hnigtebhvo fteaeaeperson average good the of this behavior Is the blamed. changing being for good are this ( who Is doctors health? we public for it’s producers, cigarette ing h otcmo a epetdycm oqi successfully quit to come today people way common most the o utfrafwdy,btfryasadyas syupoal know probably you As years? and years then for but and days, willpower few a own for their just not but nothing using it do to try fail. they quickly or quit, to try vnaltl ikadadco el hmt ut hyotndo. often they quit, they’re to if them So, tells sick. doctor getting a of and terrified sick how health- are little amazing With people a now, exam, It’s circumstances. even China such an smoking. in under for stop expensive is doctor to so usually a care told advice see are physician’s go they a they diagnosis powerful bodies, a their with in together painful and or strange feels thing laobaixing nwy h l hsagraotdcossoig odcosproduce doctors Do smoking? doctors about anger this all why Anyway, the patients to communicating not are physicians that idea this And nCia o osa vrg mkrcm oqi n od osuccessfully, so do to and quit to come smoker average an does how China, In ?I’ adt e vrg epet ut ih?Te fe never often They right? quit, to people average get to hard It’s )? MKN MN DOCTORS AMONG SMOKING ... 20 nta fattack- of instead ... sta some- that is ... perhaps 31 Downloaded By: [Stanford University] At: 21:14 19 February 2008 32 akt’(oe 9918,ta eetmdclrfr ( reform long-term medical ‘‘masculine for recent post-Maoist that China’s prospects by 1999:108), devastated (Rofel citizens’ being others’ market’’ is to and everyday being their coming well that with physical are a linked trepidation neighbor, inextricably with Kunming as expanding members 58-year-old smoking mas- of physicians my terms community interpret in like coded by heavily People, also conflated curiously culinity. woes, or embodied often of betray newspapers set is They broader through troubling. journals, disseminated as smoking whether academic almost for problematization, lever something that a divulge that as also credibility They men clinical most cessation. undermining by today—is performed China practice in bodily consumption—a cigarette doctors’ lived in had use and me: I cigarette ill to whom doctors’ noted man become Kunming 58-year-old invoke have a in quit, instance, who near to For non-clinicians physicians terms. their disparaging heard quite by have told I smoking-cessation being occasions broader year are few a past a to than the more harmful On quite over misplaced. run, altogether might seem short 2005 not the NTD agenda—does since in China least in at circulating be, been have that smoking doctors o nyd hs omnssgetta h eetpolmtzto of problematization recent the that suggest doctors comments up these do screwed only don’t how Not people about health forever most good on and or rail don’t, money could you so have I now. if seem it. are you But all forget If you. They days, any- treat money. them. these them will making in at doctors faith Look about any insurance, Kunming. all have smoke, doctor over don’t It’s they a all just If greedy. to I smoke. hospitals them today! listen These of Doctors, I right more. most quit? should smoking that I quit why recently should to read But, why me I medicines. told smoking? the he my taking and about for pressure, been medications hos- blood some I’ve the high prescribed away. to was doctor went the said I and he week, treatment, what and Last tests recently. for headaches pital serious suffering been I’ve about narratives trenchant more and new the concern—that Liang’s Dr. oen oqi,Iwn hmt utoc n edn.Bt fpol no trickery. people just suspicious if is more meaning- advice But, even our becomes done. become thinking just people be us, advice worse, and of our Or once then meaningless. well, quit completely doctors, to less, for them respect want have I longer quit, our heed to to someone continue quit? to to going them are push patients that we imagine when even you advice sick do and get longer and medicine, smoking much keep how to to people embarrassments want secretly we’re we that irresponsible, we’re e,Idntwn oen oqi huadtms hnIencourage I When times. thousand a quit to someone want don’t I Hey, that smokers, are doctors saying now news this all with know, you But, .KOHRMAN M. ... hn bu it about think yigai a resulted has ) ... how Downloaded By: [Stanford University] At: 21:14 19 February 2008 nhat aepoiinbigoernb h rts,no-holds-barred, brutish, the 2005). Hsiao by and overrun (Blumenthal capitalism being of culture provision inflationary care health in essbcm nbe o ipyb oiso ainlte u yelements by but rationalities or pro- logics those by embodiment. space, simply of and not time enabled to through have become how, work I cesses closely specifically, governmentality interrogate More we of physicians. that of processes pressed conduct which the problematize by and means create the robustly more that products tobacco the communities. of far sources their be ultimate into will the flood elsewhere address and China to as across situated such people better condemnation develop; more Once here of naturalized. outlined apparatus be one ways and the the exist about to available come is has blame information of processes type ethnohistorical this the which pedaling inside by documenting are rigorously companies research who particular, outside cigarette in based 120 firms meaning- tobacco over create big the ever of chan- treat scores to products? gets they the opposition those contempt or and in China as they long alliances can As how and ful sickened them reign? healers, citizens among at current develop Chinese neled tobacco’s movement treating meaningful against in any is engaged others can light scorn most how in wherein those ask, tobacco, making, at to by blame important cast and is easily problematization it so of present,’’ patterns the these of of ‘‘history this ending Before people’s that case the often multilayered conduct. by is medical times against at post-Mao it off about sentiments carried distress producers, elsewhere, firmer redirected develop their getting is easily and attention embo- can and cigarettes people framed Chen that both sociopolitically and upwards such being (Peto smoke, today situation diseases to died tobacco-related this at from continue than China die Rather individuals in and 1999). cigarettes these contract physicians smoke will if many half who and, to that people massive; about of fact is discontent number the present the visceral with feeling all, their services the After instead medical intertwine smoke. confront of are to and marketization smoking otherwise, diseases, the quit act cardiovascular once to at neighbor, tobacco-induced prompted to hypertensive of my doctor like a specter citizens by that encouraged relieved when be must They flation. hogotti ril aeasre hti sncsayt examine to necessary is it that asserted have I article this Throughout scholarship, better and more of production the is believe, I answer, One con- this by relieved be to have assume, must we manufacturers, Tobacco CONCLUSION MKN MN DOCTORS AMONG SMOKING 21 33 Downloaded By: [Stanford University] At: 21:14 19 February 2008 34 eerhfrti ril a upre yNHgat#K07CA093605. grant NIH by supported was article this for Research oet hp n esae yembodiment. by shaped be members, their and of shape conduct aligned to everyday in come assemblages shifts notably new NGOs, among of changes patrons. development their the and transform productive companies to for more tobacco even crucible against a perhaps directly be ahead, potent become years may to a the arena primed in into If efforts be NGOs antitobacco pandemic. may China’s for the It node then to modification. sound, for relationships of indeed poised their diversity are a manage assumptions intensity them those greater help companies, ever drug to in clinicians, institutions out advocates, seek pan- ill, projected the grantsmakers) the in its researchers, of interest near vested families a or (survivors, having demic as at themselves unfolds understanding fac- those pandemic NGOs, pace, of health-oriented tobacco-induced number small a country’s sanction assuming to the China. continues however, in party-state change, the active well that NGOs may tors: other affairs or of those state for That features negligible anti- been by now small directed until are these others while of survivors scores by They run Today, physicians. several. are hospital-based have some decades. provinces leadership, local Some two in nationwide. and differ past scattered years, quietly are the up NGOs recent popping cancer of in been much have quickly clubs jumped for anticancer has and health- of associations China number anticancer in the Still, NGOs organizing. especially hostile expansive public oriented been Society, long or more has professional Cancer Party large-scale Communist American a Chinese to the the which are of say, to non-governmental degree of odds the powerhouse foment given order a The the of for tobacco. on rise site rapid organization to any a possible against opposition is stacked otherwise a certainly in what is biosociality in hope it public-professional of glimmer landscape; a dark provide may environment NGO .Se‘Ciat tr T-eae aifCnesosfr20’ Nweg 01;sealso see 2001); (Newsedge 2002’’ for Concessions Tariff WTO-Related Start to ‘‘China See 1. n fta cus twl eitiun otaeothwsbl internal subtle how out tease to intriguing be will it occurs, that if And has diseases’’ tobacco-related by threatened ‘‘people of behalf on Action growing quickly and dynamic increasingly China’s scholarship, Beyond hn n ao(2007). Yano and Zhong .KOHRMAN M. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS NOTES Downloaded By: [Stanford University] At: 21:14 19 February 2008 4 aao ert-ercgrtespl uigte15sad16si hn u nw sthat is known but thin, is 1960s and 1950s the during supply cigarette year-to-year on Data 14. biomedical larger Kunming’s in interviewed and met have I that doctors female Although 13. per- Tang the as early as tobacco of risks the about warnings issuing began some Although 12. they healing—because of arts the that dictated long hegemony patriarchal (1980). China, Cochran in In cited 11. also (1919); O’Brien-Butler 10. .Ta otnre nCiaaefml odutepan h o ae fsoigwithin smoking of rates low the explains doubt no female are China in nurses most That 9. of percent 35 smokers; daily are women million 250 and men billion 1 nearly processes Worldwide, (2001). melds—through Samet 8. and see manifests smoking, that cigarette realm by experiential posed the risks mean health I the somatosocial on By data of 7. review recent a For 6. countries. all for available not are professionals health among smoking on domestic data enjoy Recent companies 5. Chinese 10, December China, (accessed into http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/irony Online. cigarettes Merriam-Webster 4. of smuggling the with provinces, southwest Even and 3. midwest its in grown now is tobacco China’s of percent Seventy 2. enpol eepelddfo uigcgrte rloeurle oac nteopen the on tobacco unrolled loose or cigarettes buying from precluded were 1.668 people ( mean to coupons’’ rising of ‘‘tobacco 1993, issuance billion by as lized again 80 translating doubled around literally than from Although piao more eightfold then 1995:169). and jumped (Yuan billion, production trillion 651 domestic over total to 1979, cigarettes to 1950 in from participate supervisors. themselves. to and smoke of tried to colleagues cartons needing have to and actually women form without packs these unopened exchange purchased way, in have some this them they else, In gifted anyone years by strategically the smoke and over to cigarettes encouraged intermittently being that or noted smoking have ever if rarely report 2003:36–94). (Diko facilities Hughes qualities also disease-deterring see and 1992:44; harmonizing Wang of 1985:1; Ma grounds variety the 2004:26–28; a on tobacco possessed touted often it more that scholars medical Chinese pre-1949 (618–907), iod (1995:150–151, Yip see discussion, process, further The For 1999). pace. (Lu slow biomedicine painfully 230). in a initially physi- at century, female moved 20th begun, of the once of training demarcate dawn programmatic the to at missionaries, helped began by and cians Spearheaded to 1987). open inequitably (Hymes honor—were men 2005). and Wang title and practitioners Wei, afforded (Smith, study one in overall percent 2.6 as percent low 3 as than 2004:7). profession, less Health of that whereas and China, daily Smoking smoke In of males 2003). Association of Amos (Chinese percent (Mackay, do and 58 women women as above, Mackay smoke of and also men old many see years as 15 98–105; times those 10 2006:22–25; them, Omar gender-specific percent of which and 34 9 for least and Eriksen, countries at men 150 in of the available, percent of are 50 and data smoke; and countries countries, developing developed in in women women of of percent 22 and men sociopolitics. of forces and all personhood, of embodiment—corporeality, half of 98–105). than 26–27, more 2006: al. example, et for are (Mackay Europe; smoke physicians In Bulgaria Eastern among and smokers. and medical Armenia smoking third-year cigarette Asia in of male regular Central doctors of Rates in are percent smokers. high professionals 33 cigarette especially and health report being female countries their of those acknowledge of of percent students 30 37 four available, Argentina, in are Aires, data one Buenos which least for at countries 78 that least at the Among 2006:1081). Collin and (Lee 2007). percent 94 as much as of past shares the market in revenue government overall of percent 80 2006:141–142). to (Wang 40 for decade responsible been has it where ,teevuhr eeol o h omlaqiiino iaets h ihyregiona- highly The cigarettes. of acquisition formal the for only were vouchers these ), inynpiao xiangyan trigi oeaesa al stelt 90,ddnot did 1950s, late the as early as areas some in starting , MKN MN DOCTORS AMONG SMOKING guanxi bidn hog cigarette through -building ¨ tre al. et tter xiangyan 35 Downloaded By: [Stanford University] At: 21:14 19 February 2008 lmnhl .adW Hsiao W. and D. Blumenthal, eoiz N. Benowitz, ejn onn Post Morning Beijing alw T. Barlow, ACS 36 1 elcigti gnsi ulo swl stehsiiista otr o fe ae the face, often now doctors that hostilities the as of well Survey as outlook Prevalence agonistic National this Reflecting 1996 21. China’s by an supported to somewhat refer ‘‘must be notes, to Foucault seems governmentality,’’ of This analysis 20. the that me to seems argument ‘‘It related 19. and important an makes Farquhar China, rural (2004) in al. research et her Wang on the which Based on 18. (‘‘KAP’’) framework theoretical the of reviews critical For mine. 17. is here Emphasis 16. to serving forces other and binary discursive this of efficacy the that evidence some is There 15. 05PiaiainadisDsotns h vligCieeHat aeSystem. Care Health Chinese Evolving The Discontents: its and Privatization 2005 01TeNtr fNctn Addiction. Nicotine of Nature The 2001 05Wihnb auYya ioh igo ihn iueya Cengshouguo Yiwurenyuan Qicheng Jieguo: Diaocha Yiyuan Fabu Weishengbu 2005 05Byn n hnhiadteSx oenGr mg nte12 n 90s. 1930 and s 1920 the in Image Girl Modern Sexy the and Shanghai In: Buying 2005 06TbcoCnrlFotadCne tItrainlCneecs ilo Tobacco Billion 1 Conferences: International at Center and Front Control Tobacco 2006 iityo elhrpre nlt 05ta vr7 ecn falhsiasnationwide hospitals 2005). Post all Morning of intimidating, (Beijing beating, percent ‘‘violently staff 70 families clinical over their cursing’’ and that and patients 2005 experiencing late regularly been in had reported Health of given Ministry percent) (47 1997:47). explanation al. frequent et most (Yang the attempts (2005:252). was quit self’’ ‘‘illness’’ for to that self found the which of Smoking relationship the by defined subject the of (1996:251). ethics pattern Euro-American stereotypical the during any professionals follow medical will among epoch ‘‘individuation’’ (2004). that post-Mao Jones assuming of and pitfalls Williams the and about (2004), Ullah (1976), Smith see based, is study percent. 61 to 51 smoking in from growth rise a a chronicled also with study physicians, 1987 Their male between percent. taken physicians among 12.2 female sample to rates among 4.8 one rates from in smoking jumped that, con- Wuhan, 1996 of documented and cigarette and city (1999) in Chinese 1980s al. central rise et the the significant Li in during a example, decline For fueled to nationwide. liberalization sumption began economic cigarettes post-Maoist using when 1990s from special physicians holidays, female before that inoculate cigarettes addition, quality ‘‘higher’’ sale. In acquire for cigarettes. to available citizens not to allowed in often of access that were often people issued that have issued, often guarantee were were could to coupons coupons holidays, levels the national income important me, most all to the explained before have number greatest informants as Instead, market. .KOHRMAN M. h e nln ora fMdcn 353(11):1165–1170. Medicine of Journal England New The .Soi,e.P.1917 huadOk,Clf:Sg Publications. Sage Calif.: Oaks, Thousand 159–187. Pp. ed. Slovic, P. exe[iityo elhrlae optlsuyrsls 0preto medical of percent 70 results: 1. study p. September, hospital 30 releases threatened]. are Health personnel of [Ministry Weixie rsne tCS olqim tnodUniversity. Stanford Colloquium. CASA at Presented International_Conferences.asp etsPsil fCretTed otne vial thttp://www.cancer. at Available Continue. Trends Current if org/docroot/NWS/ Possible Deaths content/NWS_2_1x_Tobacco_Cont REFERENCES In mkn:Rs,Preto n Policy. and Perception Risk, Smoking: rol_Front_and_Center_at_ Downloaded By: [Stanford University] At: 21:14 19 February 2008 eg S. Feng, J. Farquhar, P. Farmer, A. D. Evenden, J. Evans, E. E. Evans-Pritchard, Diko Diko M. Dean, T. Csordas, S. Cochran, Daily City Health and Smoking on Association Chinese Yurekli A. and Jacobs, R. Warner, K. Hu, T.-W. F., Chaloupka, S. Brownell, T. Brook, P. Bourdieu, 05RtoaiyadSl-oto:TeIpiain o mkn esto.Junlof Journal Cessation. Smoking for Implications The Self-Control: and Rationality American Mao. 2005 after Medicine in Personal Getting and Rich Getting of Magic: University Market Berkeley: Blame. 1996 of Geography the and Haiti in Accusation: Surgeons and Male AIDS and Female 1992 of Practice and Licensing the in Differences Gender 1998 China. in Clarendon. Education UK: Medical Oxford, Azande. the 1988 Among Magic Hurst. and C. Oracles London: Witchcraft, China. in Drugs 1937 of History A Culture: Narcotic 2004 92TeDsoreo aei oenCia odn K Hurst. UK: London, China. Modern in Race of Discourse The 1992 99Gvrmnaiy oe n uei oenScey odn aePublications. Sage London: Society. Modern in Rule and Power Governmentality: 18(1):5–47. Ethos Anthropology. 1999 for Paradigm 1890–1930. a as Industry Embodiment Cigarette the 1988 in from Rivalry Day Sino-Foreign Tobacco China: in No Business stopping Big hole [The 1980 Kan’’ de Liyi Maibuguo ‘‘Wuyanri [2002 Diaocha 2005 Liuxingbingxue De Xingwei Xiyan Renqun Zhongguo Nian 2002 2004 Products. Tobacco Republic. of People’s the Taxation of The Order Moral the 2000 in Sports China: for Body the Training 1995 China. Imperial in Smoking Press. University 2004 Stanford Calif.: Stanford, Domination. Masculine 2001 ¨ ¨ tr . .Laan n .Zhou X. and Laamann, L. F., tter, tr F. tter, oi-cnmc 34(2):211–222. Socio-Economics 23(2):239–257. Ethnologist Press. California 42(2):194–216. History Medical England. Modern 239–259. Early Pp. eds. Michigan. Sivin, of N. University and the Hess, Studies Chinese W. for J. Center Bowers, Arbor: Z. Ann J. Education. and Research abig,Ms. avr nvriyPress. University Harvard Mass.: Cambridge, May. 31 succeeding]. Smoking Chinese 62(5):7–13. of University Newsletter Health behavior]. and Oxford smoking China’s Oxford: of survey epidemiological 237–272. Pp. eds. Chaloupka, F. and Press. Jha P. tries. Press. Chicago of University IL: Chicago, Books. Reaktion London: 84–91. Pp. eds. Zhou, X. In In mk:AGoa itr fSoig .Gla and Gilman S. Smoking. of History Global A Smoke: cec n eiiei wnit-etr China: Twentieth-Century in Medicine and Science In oac oto nDvlpn Coun- Developing in Control Tobacco MKN MN DOCTORS AMONG SMOKING 37 Downloaded By: [Stanford University] At: 21:14 19 February 2008 ora,M. Kohrman, ins A. Kipnis, in,Y,X e,J io .Sn,J ag .X,X u .Xa .X,H ag and Wang, H. Xu, H. Xia, J. Wu, X. Xu, H. Wang, J. Song, G. Yang Tiao, N. J. Y. Wei, X. Y., Jiang, R. Hymes, R. Hurt, J. Hughes, og .adL Qiu L. and L. Hong, ols .adS Lukes S. and M. Hollis, ate .adR .Dawes M. R. and R. Hastie, K. Hæger, akt,M C. M. Hackett, rehlh S. Greenhalgh, re,D .adI Shapiro I. and P. D. Green, od .J D. M.-J. Good, M. Foucault, R. Flynn, egsn .adA Gupta A. and J. Ferguson, 38 04Sol ut oac,FagtIett,adteRsso oenetlt in Governmentality of Risks the and Identity, Fraught Tobacco, Quit? I Should 2004 97PouigGax:Sniet ef n ucluei ot hn Village. China North a in Subculture and Self, Sentiment, Guanxi: Producing 1997 05Zogu iCegh iueya ia hagun Tecniino smoking of condition [The Zhuangkuang Xiyan Yiwurenyuan Chengshi Li Zhongguo 8:9–76. Science 2005 Chinese Yuan. and Sung in Doctors Parthenon. Gentlemen? York: Quite New Not Times. Early from 1987 Surgery Press. Cardiothoracic Chicago of of History University The Chicago: West. the 1996 in Use Tobacco Smoke: to Learning 2003 01Zogu aynBat u[ eodo hns l iaet akg designs]. package cigarette old Chinese of record [A Lu Biaotu Laoyan Zhongguo 2001 92Introduction. 1982 01Rtoa hiei nUcranWrd h scooyo ugetadDecision and Judgment of Psychology The World: Uncertain an in Choice Publishers. Rational Dearborn Fitzroy Chicago: 2001 Surgery. of History Illustrated The 2000 99Ipeetn lnclGvrac nTut.ItrainlJunlo elhCare Health of Journal International Trusts. in Governance Clinical Implementing 1999 01UdrteMdclGz:FcsadFcin fCrncPi.Bree:Uiest of University Berkeley: Pain. Chronic of Fictions and Facts Gaze: Medical the Under 2001 94Ptooiso ainlCoc hoy rtqeo plctosi Political in Applications of Critique A Theory: Choice Rational of Pathologies 1994 95Aeia eiie h us o optne ekly nvriyo California of University Berkeley: Competence. for Quest the Medicine, American 1995 4:155–173. Governmentality. Society and Risk 1991 Health, Governmentality. and Governance Clinical 2002 05TeHreetc fteSbet etrsa h Colle the at Lectures Subject: the of Hermeneutics The 2005 Governmentality. Neoliberal of Ethnography an Toward States: Spatializing 2002 .KOHRMAN M. ra hn.UbnAtrplg 33(2–4):211–245. Anthropology Urban China. Urban uhm .. ueUiest Press. University Duke N.C.: Durham, mn eia esne nsxCieecte] hngoJakn iou(China Jiaoyu Jiankang Zhongguo cities]. Chinese 21(6):403–407. six Education) Health in personnel medical among ejn:Zogu hny Press. Shangye Zhongguo Beijing: xod Blackwell. Oxford: aig huadOk,Clf:Sage. Calif.: Oaks, Thousand Making. ult suac 12:210–213. Assurance Quality aionaPress. California cec.NwHvn aeUiest Press. University Yale Haven: New Science. Press. .Brhl,tas e ok Palgrave-Macmillan. Press. York: Chicago New of trans. University Burchell, Chicago: G. 87–104. Pp. eds. Miller, P. and Gordon, C. 29(4):981–1002. Ethnologist American In ainlt n eaiim .Hli n .Lks d.P.1–20. Pp. eds. Lukes, S. and Hollis M. Relativism. and Rationality In h ocutEfc:Suisi oenetlt.G Burchell, G. Governmentality. in Studies Effect: Foucault The ` ed rne 1981–82. France, de ge Downloaded By: [Stanford University] At: 21:14 19 February 2008 ok M. Lock, M. M.-C. Lo, S. Llewellyn, Chen N. and Liu, Y. X., Liu, and Campbell, C. Xiong T. B. Li, and T. J.-Y. Liu, Wu, Y.-P. Boreham, J. Chen, Z.-M. Chen Peto, J.-S. R. B.-Q., Liu, X. Li, Zhou X. and Fish, D. Z., H. Li, Collin J. and K. Lee, Walters W. and W. Larner, er,S. Merry, E. Martin, Omar S. and Eriksen, M. J., Mackay, W. Ma, P. Lu, K. Louie, 98Pretn oit:Rpoutv ehoois eei etn,adthe and Testing, Genetic Technologies, Reproductive Society: Perfecting Taiwan. Colonial in 1998 Modernity and Ethnicity, Profession, 22: Borders: Studies within Doctors Organization Managers. 2002 Medical as 15(2): Clinicians Plan Windows: Policy Two-Way Health Regulation. 2001 Price Hospital Control]. of Experience Tobacco Chinese and The Economy [Tobacco 2000 Kongzhi Yancao Yu Jingji Yancao 2004 Study Mortality Proportional Retrospective 1. China: in Hazards Tobacco Emerging 1998 Press. Haitian Shenzhen: among coupons). Counseling (old Piaozheng Anti-Smoking Lao of Decline 1999 and Smoking Cigarette in China. Increase in Smuggling Cigarette 1999 and Tobacco American British Future’’: the to ‘‘Key Routledge. York: New 2006 Spaces. International Governing Governmentality: Global 2004 Memory-Making and Death, Sociality, Male Exceptionality: Tobacco’s Depoliticizing 2007 01SailGvmetlt n h e ra oilOdr otoln Gender Controlling Order: Social Urban New the and Govemmentality Spatial Beacon MA: 2001 Boston, Reproduction. of Analysis Cultural A Body: the in Woman The Society. Cancer Renmin 1987 American Beijing: Atlanta: Atlas. Health]. Tobacco and The Tea Alcohol, 2006 [Tobacco, Jiankang Yu Western Cha of Jiu Introduction Yan the after 1985 China in Education Medical Woman Modern 1999 Oakleigh, Cambridge, China. in Gender and Society Masculinity: Chinese Theorising 2002 lne aiyi Japan. in Family Planned Press. California of University Berkeley: 593–623. 157–163. Press. Science Economic Beijing: 317(7170):1411–1422. Journal Medical British Deaths. Million One of 14(2):123–131. International Promotion Health 1987–1996. Physicians: Chinese 3(7):1080–1089. Medicine PLoS 58:85–109. Journal China The Smokers. Cigarette Chinese among ilnetruhLw mrcnAtrplgs 103(1):16–29. Anthropologist American Law. through Violence Press. Press. Weisheng 29(1):42–45. History Medical of Journal Chinese Medicine. Medical in Studies Cambridge Press. University Cambridge York: Vic.: New 206–239. Pp. eds. Anthropology. Kaufert, P. In rgai oe n oyPltc.M okand Lock M. Politics. Body and Women Pragmatic MKN MN DOCTORS AMONG SMOKING 39 Downloaded By: [Stanford University] At: 21:14 19 February 2008 hlig .C. C. Shilling, cee-uhs N. Scheper-Hughes, ae,J. Samet, M. Sahlins, oe N. Rose, og G. Rong, oe,L. Rofel, ed R. Reid, Chen Z. and R. Peto, er,R .adB Maurer B. and W. R. Perry, leze,R. Oldenziel, O’Brien-Butler Newsedge ainlCne o AIDS for Center National ors A. Morris, oat-ace,R. Morantz-Sanchez, 40 01Ebdmn,Eprec n hoy nDfneo h oilgclTaiin The Tradition. Sociological the of Defense In Theory: and Experience Embodiment, 2001 94Ebde nweg:Tikn ihteBd nCiia eia Anthr Medical Critical in Body the with Thinking Knowledge: Embodied 1994 01TeRsso cieadPsieSmoking. Passive and Active of Press. Risks Chicago The of University IL: 2001 Chicago, Reason. Practical and Culture 1976 99Pwr fFedm ermn oiia huh.NwYr:CmrdeUniversity Cambridge York: New Thought. Political Reframing Freedom: of Powers 1999 04Ynio huagy inhn TbcoLbl:CletadAppreciate]. and Collect Labels: [Tobacco Jianshang yu Shoucang Yanbiao: 2004 99OhrMdriis edrdYannsi hn fe oils.Berkeley: Socialism. after China in Yearnings Gendered Modernities: Other 1999 05GoaiigTbcoCnrl nisoigCmagsi aiona rne and France, California, in Campaigns Anti-smoking Control: Tobacco Globalizing 5:15–17. Medicine 2005 Nature Epidemic. Growing The Tobacco: 1999 03Introduction. 2003 99Mkn ehooyMsuie e,WmnAdMdr ahnsI America, In Machines Modern And Women Men, Masculine: Office. Technology Records Making Public London: Office. 1999 Foreign British the of Records 1919 01‘Ciat tr T-eae aifCnesosfr20.’2 eebr http:// December, 26 2002.’’ for Concessions Tariff WTO-Related Start to ‘‘China 2001 0520 paeo h HIV the on Update 2005 2005 04Mro fteNto:AHsoyo pr n hsclCluei eulcnChina. Republican in Culture Physical and Sport of History A Nation: the of Marrow 2004 95Mkn ti a’ ol:TeLt-9hcnuySria aero ayAmanda Mary of Career Surgical Late-19th-century The World: Man’s a in it Making 1995 .KOHRMAN M. oilgclRve 49(3):327–344. Review Sociological sesn utrlAtrplg.R oosy d p 2–3.NwYork: New 229–239. Pp. ed. Borofsky, R. Anthropology. McGraw-Hill. Cultural Assessing .Soi,e.P.32.Tosn as ai. aePublications. Sage Calif.: Oaks, Thousand 3–28. Pp. ed. Slovic, P. Press. hnhi hnhiKxeJsuPress. Jishu Kexue Shanghai Shanghai: nvriyo aionaPress. California of University aa.Bomntn N nin nvriyPress. University Indiana IN: Bloomington, Japan. dniy .W er n .Mue,es p x,37 inaoi:Uiest of University Minneapolis: 367. xxi, Pp. eds. Maurer, B. Press. and Minnesota Perry W. R. Identity. 8014.Asedm mtra nvriyPress. University Amsterdam Amsterdam: 1870–1945. legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/ose17a00 epesRpbi fCia on ntdNtosPormeo HIV on Programme Beijing. Nations Organization. United Health Joint China, of Republic People’s ekly nvriyo aionaPress. California of University Berkeley: io Jones. Dixon In In ultno h itr fMdcn 69(4):542. Medicine of History the of Bulletin = lblzto ne osrcin oenetlt,Lw and Law, Governmentality, Construction: Under Globalization T rvninadControl and Prevention STD = ISEiei n epnei hn:Mnsr fHealth, of Ministry China: in Response and Epidemic AIDS In mkn:Rs,Preto n Policy. and Perception Risk, Smoking: = ISWorld AIDS opology. In Downloaded By: [Stanford University] At: 21:14 19 February 2008 ak D. Wank, Y. Wang, Zhang J. and Bao, T. Wu, J. X., Wang, H. Wang, Spurgeon P. and Wallance, L. Latham, L. Freeman, T. K., Walshe, A. Walder, P. Unschuld, mt,S .S. E. S. Smith, Wang R.-S. and Wei, N. D., Smith, P. Slovic, la,A. Ullah, S. Traweek, Online TobaccoChina S. Tambiah, 00Cgrte n oiaini hns uiesNtok:IsiuinlChange Institutional Networks: Business Chinese in Domination and Cigarettes 2000 Tobacco: Yu [Bright Shi Fazhan Chang Zhuanyan Yuxi and Yunnan Yuyan: Personnel Zhiguang Medical among 1992 Control and Smoking of and KAP Development on Economic Investigation Between Dilemma 2004 The China: in Control Tobacco 2006 Services Health England: Birmingham, Practice. to Policy From Governance: Clinical 2000 Berkeley, Industry. Chinese in Authority and Berkeley: Work Anthropology. Neo-Traditionalism: Communist Historical in 1986 Study A China: Imperial in Ethics Medical 1979 96TeKPi ey:aCiia oka A uvyMethodology. Survey KAP at Look Critical a Kenya: in KAP The Contemporary China. 1976 Mainland in Nurses Among Habits Smoking Contemporary 2005 Fools? Rational or Actors Rational Smokers: Cigarette 2001 04AScoutrlAayi fSxa ikadDsaei eeoigCuty The Country: Developing a in Disease and Risk Sexual of Analysis Sociocultural A 2004 Harvard Cambridge: Physicists. Energy High of World The Lifetimes: and Beamtimes Sales. Production, Cigarette of 1988 Growth Balanced Registers Industry Tobacco China’s Cambridge UK: 2007 Cambridge, Rationality. of Scope the and Religion, Science, Magic, 1990 .Dvs d p 6–8.Bree:Uiest fClfri Press. California of University Berkeley: 268–286. Pp. ed. Transition. Davis, D. Market the During Yunnan Kunming: Development]. Factory’s Tobacco Yuxi Press. People’s Yunnan the of History Science Medical Behavioral of Journal Chinese Factors. 13(2):201–203. Influencing its of Analysis 1):140–147. 48(Supplement Mexico de Publica Salud Improvement. Health Birmingham. of University Centre, Management Press. California of University CA: Press. California of University Wales. South New of University Australia: Dissertation, Industry. Sex eto n oiy .Soi,e.P.9–2.Tosn as ai. Sage Calif.: Oaks, Thousand 20(2):258–266. Nurse 97–124. Pp. ed. Slovic, P. Policy. Publications. and ception alr fKPBsdTere ple oCnrligHIV Controlling to Applied Theories KAP-Based of Failure Press. University Press. University Chapel 263–288. Pp. eds. Polgar, Press. Carolina S. North and of Marshall University J. Hill: Planning. Family and Natality In h osmrRvlto nUbnChina. Urban in Revolution Consumer The MKN MN DOCTORS AMONG SMOKING = In ISi h Bangladeshi the in AIDS mkn:Rs,Per- Risk, Smoking: In Culture, 41 Downloaded By: [Stanford University] At: 21:14 19 February 2008 hn,F n .Yano E. and F. Zhong, hn,E. Zhang, un T. Yuan, i,K.-C. Yip, i . .Lu n .Gan Z. and Liu, Y. B., Yi, ag .M.-H. M. Yang, ag . .Fn .Tn .Q,Y hn,J ae,C alr .Bce,adJ Xu J. and Becker, K. Taylor, C. Samet, J. Zhang, Y. Qi, G. Tan, J. Fan, L. G., Yang, a,Y. Yan, u X. Xu, u X. Xu, ilas .A n .O .Jones H. O. C. and A. H. Williams, 42 07BiihAeia oac’ atc uigCiasacsint h ol Trade World the to accession China’s during tactics Tobacco’s American British 2007 2001 95Zogu ia hha[itrclNraieo mkn nCia.Beijing: China]. in Smoking of Narrative [Historical Shihua Xiyan Zhongguo 1995 95Hat n ainlRcntuto nNtoaitCia h eeomn of Development The China: Nationalist in Reconstruction National and Health 1995 95LoSaga un a OdAvrieet fSaga] hnhi Shanghai Shanghai: Shanghai]. of Advertisements [Old Gao Guang Shanghai Lao 1995 94Gfs aos n aqes h r fSca eainhp nCia taa N.Y.: Ithaca, China. in Relationships Social of Art The Banquets: and Favors, Gifts, 1994 97SoigadHat nCia 96Ntoa rvlneSre fSoigPatterns. Smoking of Survey Prevalence National 1996 China: in Health and Smoking 1997 96TeFo fGfs eirct n oilNtok naCieeVlae Stanford: Village. Chinese a in Networks Social and Reciprocity Gifts: of Flow The 1996 05WyniMiuu iiea TeHl rmWih‘oTbcoDy cannot Day’ Tobacco ‘No Which from Hole [The Liyidekan Maibuguo Wuyanri 2005 01CieePoesoasadteRpbia tt:TeRs fPoesoa Associations Professional of Rise The State: Republican the and Professionals Chinese 2001 04ACiia eiwo eairlIse eae oMlraCnrli Sub-Saharan in Control Malaria to Related Issues Behavioral of Review Critical A 2004 .KOHRMAN M. raiain oac oto 16(2):133–7. Control Tobacco Organization. ie.D ogo,e.P.2525 e ok Palgrave. York: New 235–265. Pp. ed. Hodgson, D. China. tives. Post-Socialist of Areas tan Goudui nentoa omrilPress. Commercial International oenHat evcs 9813.AnAbr ih:AscainfrAsian for Association Mich.: Arbor, Ann 1928–1937. Studies. Services, Health Modern uboChubanshe. Huabao onl nvriyPress. University Cornell ejn:CiaSineadTcnlg Press. Technology and Science China Beijing: tnodUiest Press. University Stanford dac] osiSia [ Shibao Doushi Advance]. nSaga,11–97 abig,UK:CmrdeUiest Press. University Cambridge U.K.: Cambridge, 1912–1937. Shanghai, in fia htCnrbtosHv oilSinit ae oilSineand Science Social Made? Scientists Social Have 59(3):501–523. Contributions Medicine What Africa: n h tt:Cntutn nrpeera aclnt nToCosmopoli- Two in Masculinity Entrepreneurial Constructing State: the and iyDaily City In ,3 May. 31 ], edrdMdriis tngahcPerspec- Ethnographic Modernities: Gendered