Police Reform in Scotland

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Police Reform in Scotland het Tijdschrift voor de Politie – jg.77/nr.10/15 Focus on a ‘new start’ 39 Police Reform in Scotland Professor Nicho- The creation of Police Scotland in 2013 has sparked an important debate las R Fyfe, Direc- tor, Scottish Insti- about the nature of the relationship between police, politics and tute for Policing communities in contemporary Scotland. The impact of the developments Research & Associate Dean, (changes in both style and governance of policing) has been to create a School of Social Sciences, Univer- new politics and a new level of politicisation of policing. Following the sity of Dundee. resignation of the Chief Constable in 2015 and a change in Justice Minister, there is now a focus on a ‘new start’ for the national force. lthough it is common for people to talk of Scottish Government as a way of strengthening the connec- ‘British’ policing, the last 4 years have seen a tion between the police and local communities, the archi- remarkable divergence in the way the police are tects of reform also highlight the benefits of ending a very organised and governed between Scotland and uneven picture in terms of access to specialist policing Athe rest of the country. In England and Wales the Police resources. Critics by contrast, claim that reform has Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011 has introduced brought about a significant local democratic deficit, a 43 locally elected Police and Crime Commissioners with strong focus on enforcement and the emergence of a ‘one responsibility for each police force budget and holding size fits all’ approach to policing for the whole of Scotland. chief constables to account. In Scotland, the Police and Fire Reform (Scotland) Act 2012 passed by the devolved The context to police reform in Scotland Scottish Parliament brought about the merger of Scotland’s The history of modern policing in Scotland (like that of eight regional police forces to create a national police England and Wales) is characterized by periods when local force. police forces have been merged to create larger regional The contrast between a commitment to localism in police organizations. In the 1850s, for example, there were policing in England and Wales and centralism in Scotland over 90 local forces in Scotland but only half this number could not be starker. Indeed, Scotland’s police reforms 100 years later. By the early 1970s the number of forces mark one of the most radical public sector reforms for a had halved again to 22 and by 1975 there were just 8 generation, and arguably the biggest change to the policing forces aligned with the boundaries of new regional authori- of Scotland since the nineteenth century. Not surprisingly ties. the creation of Police Scotland (which became operational Given this history, the merger of these 8 forces to create on 1st April 2013) has sparked an important debate about a single national police force in 2013 might seem like the the nature of the relationship between police, politics and inevitable end point in a process of force amalgamations. communities in contemporary Scotland. Presented by the Yet such an assumption would be misleading. The need for reform was set against a background of concerns about the economic crisis affecting the UK and the depth of public spending cuts required in Scotland. As a result a project to Public opinion was identify a ‘sustainable policing model’ was initiated within government in 2011 and a public consultation on reform far from supportive of carried out seeking views on 3 options: retaining the existing 8 forces but requiring enhanced collaboration; creating 3 or 4 larger regional forces through mergers; and national police in Scotland. establishing a new national police force. The key findings from these two initiatives were rather Less than 10% favoured different. The report of the Sustainable Policing Project was clear in its support of a national police force saying it this option would improve efficiency and allow for significant financial savings. The results of the public consultation published three months later suggested, however, that public opinion 40 Police Reform in Scotland het Tijdschrift voor de Politie – jg.77/nr.10/15 was far from supportive of this conclusion. There was very rity’. The strategic priorities for the SPA are set by Scottish limited support for a national force (less than 10% of ministers and the SPA must produce a three year strategic respondents favoured this option) with most responses plan as well as an annual police plan in consultation with favouring a regional structure. The consultation also the chief constable. highlighted anxieties about a national structure, including Third, the Act has made ‘local policing’ a statutory concerns that it would draw resources away from more requirement at the level of the 32 council areas. Each area rural and remote areas and concentrate these in the central has a local commander with responsibility for preparing a area of Scotland between Glasgow and Edinburgh. local policing plan and for consulting with the local coun- The diversity of views revealed by the public consulta- cil over this plan. The local council must also establish tion was mirrored among Scotland’s eight chief constables. arrangements for the scrutiny of local policing but the Act Most were in favour of retaining a regional structure, but does not prescribe what form this scrutiny should take. Sir Stephen House, chief constable of what was then Fourth, the Act sets out a normative vision for policing Scotland’s largest force, Strathclyde Police, was a strong in the form of a set of ‘principles’ which offer a narrative of advocate of the enhanced efficiency and effectiveness that policing based on partnership working, community well- a national police force could deliver (and in due course Sir being and harm reduction: Stephen became the first chief constable of the national the main purpose of policing is to improve the safety and police, Police Scotland). well-being of persons, localities and communities in Scot- In September 2011, 15 months after the need for reform land, and that the Police Service, working in collaboration was first raised, the Justice Minister announced to the with others where appropriate, should seek to achieve that Scottish Parliament that a bill to establish a national police main purpose by policing in a way which (i) is accessible to, force (and a new national fire service) would be introduced. and engaged with, local communities, and (ii) promotes In his speech he spelt out the three key objectives of measures to prevent, crime, harm and disorder (Police and reform: to protect and improve local services; create more Fire Reform (Scotland) Act, 2012, para.32). equal access to specialist support and national capacity; Informed by these principles, the duties of a police and strengthen the connections between services and officer are restated to include not only preventing and communities. detecting crime, maintaining order, and protecting life and property, but also to act with fairness, integrity and impar- The content of reform tiality, uphold fundamental human rights, and give ‘equal The 2012 Police and Fire Reform (Scotland) Act (hereafter respect to all people, according to the law’. the Police Reform Act) set out four major changes to policing in Scotland. First, it established a national police Emerging evidence of impact I: changes to the force under the direction and control of a chief constable style of policing with responsibility for the administration, allocation and As Police Scotland has become established two contras- deployment of resources and the provision of information. ting narratives have developed around its impact and Second, it established the Scottish Police Authority achievements. On the one hand, both Scottish Govern- (SPA) with responsibility for resourcing the police service, ment and Police Scotland have focused on framing the supporting continuous improvement, and holding the chief achievements of the national force in terms of a new constable to account. The chair of the SPA is appointed by public management discourse of efficiency, effectiveness Scottish ministers and the other board members are selec- and ‘benefits realisation’. According to Scottish Govern- ted (rather than elected) on the basis of possessing ‘the ment, reform is already delivering savings through the skills and expertise relevant to the functions of the Autho- rationalisation of the senior command structure and improvements in effectiveness by enhancing national capacity in areas like air support, major crime investigati- ons, and roads policing. At a broader level, Similarly, Police Scotland has provided a detailed self-assessment of how they perceive their progress however, a more critical towards delivering local community and policing priori- ties, improved collaborative working with partners, impro- ved delivery of specialist resources, establishing consis- narrative has emerged tent training, and the streamlining of command and control. In addition, through the establishment of the about the impact of Police Scottish Crime Campus the capacity and capability to tackle terrorism and serious and organised crime has been Scotland enhanced by co-locating specialists from Police Scotland along with staff from the UK National Crime Agency, Revenue and Customs, the public prosecutors office, and het Tijdschrift voor de Politie – jg.77/nr.10/15 Police Reform in Scotland 41 Of greatest significance in the debate about ‘Strathclydification’ has been the increasing use of the police tactic of ‘stop and search’ across Scotland. forensic services. These achievements are also linked to Stop and search how Police Scotland has been able to deliver on the Scot- Of greatest significance in the debate about ‘Strathclydifi- tish Government’s savings targets without any reductions cation’ has been the increasing use of the police tactic of in police officer numbers. ‘stop and search’ across Scotland. Before reform stop and search rates varied significantly across the old regional ‘Strathclydification of policing’ forces.
Recommended publications
  • Electronic Letterhead / Restricted
    NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED 18th August 2014 Your Ref: Our Ref: IM-FOI-2014-1276 request-217266- [email protected] Sir Stephen House QPM Chief Constable FOI Central Processing Unit 173 Pitt Street Glasgow G2 4JS [email protected] Dear Mr Laidlaw FREEDOM OF INFORMATION (SCOTLAND) ACT 2002 SUBJECT: OFFICERS AND STAFF WITH CONVICTIONS REQUEST FOR REVIEW I refer to your email dated 22nd June regarding the above. I apologise for the delay in responding and note you have a requested a review of the way Police Scotland has handled your request as a result. Unfortunately, some of the information took longer than hoped to trace and it is this that caused the delay. I therefore wholly accept that we have failed to meet our obligations to respond within 20 working days as laid down in the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002. That said I can now offer a response to your request. QUESTION I would like to ask about police employees with criminal records. I have a list of questions below 1a. How many serving police officers have a criminal record 1.b. what are the ranks of these officers 1.c. what crimes are they convicted off scotland.police.uk @PoliceScotland PoliceScotland NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED I use the term "police officer" I am not sure if all police ranks use the term officer so by this I mean these ranks. Chief Constable Deputy Chief Constable Assistant Chief Constable Chief Superintendent Superintendent Chief Inspector Inspector Sergeant Constable 2a. How many police support staff have criminal records 2.b.
    [Show full text]
  • National Policing Board Minutes: 4 November 2020
    National Policing Board Minutes 4 November 2020 Title of meeting National Policing Board Date 4 November 2020 Time 10:00-11:30 Venue Virtual meeting via videoconference Chair Rt Hon Priti Patel MP: Home Secretary Attendees • Rt Hon Priti Patel MP: Home Secretary (Chair) • Kit Malthouse MP: Minister of State for Crime and Policing • Rt Hon James Brokenshire MP: Minister of State for Security • Victoria Atkins MP: Minister for Safeguarding • Lord Stephen Greenhalgh: Minister of State for Building Safety, Fire and Communities • Martin Hewitt QPM: Chair of the National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC) • Sir Stephen House QPM: Deputy Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police Service – for Dame Cressida Dick DBE QPM: Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police Service • Paddy Tipping: Chair, Association of Police and Crime Commissioners (APCC) • Nina Cope: Director General (Capabilities), National Crime Agency (NCA) – for Lynne Owens CBE QPM: Director General, NCA • Mike Cunningham QPM: Chief Executive Officer of the College of Policing • Sir Thomas Winsor: HM Chief Inspector of Constabulary & HM Chief Inspector of Fire & Rescue Services • Neil Basu QPM: Head of UK Counter Terrorism Policing • Matthew Rycroft CBE: Permanent Secretary • Patricia Hayes: Director General, Crime, Policing and Fire Group • Julia Kinniburgh: Director General, Serious and Organised Crime Group • Rachel Watson: Policing Director, Crime, Policing and Fire Group • Kenny Bowie: Strategy Director, Crime, Policing and Fire Group Special invitees • Police and Crime Commissioner Marc Jones: APCC Serious and Organised Crime Lead Welcome and Introduction 1. RT HON PRITI PATEL MP, HOME SECRETARY noted it was the last meeting for MIKE CUNNINGHAM QPM, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF THE COLLEGE OF POLICING before retiring and thanked him for his unstinting service to policing.
    [Show full text]
  • 7-8 October 2020, Virtual Meeting
    Security Classification NPCC Policy: Documents cannot be accepted or ratified without a security classification (Protective Marking may assist in assessing whether exemptions to FOIA may apply): OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE Freedom of information (FOI) This document (including attachments and appendices) may be subject to an FOI request and the NPCC FOI Officer & Decision Maker will consult with you on receipt of a request prior to any disclosure. For external Public Authorities in receipt of an FOI, please consult with [email protected] Author and Contributors: Susan Paterson, Richard Hampson, Sherry Traquair Force/Organisation: NPCC Date Created: 5 October 2020 Coordination Committee: NPCC Central Office Portfolio: N/A Attachments @ para N/A Information Governance & Security In compliance with the Government’s Security Policy Framework’s (SPF) mandatory requirements, please ensure any onsite printing is supervised, and storage and security of papers are in compliance with the SPF. Dissemination or further distribution of this paper is strictly on a need to know basis and in compliance with other security controls and legislative obligations. If you require any advice, please contact [email protected] https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/security-policy-framework/hmg-security-policy-framework#risk-management Chief Constables' Council Minutes 7-8 October 2020, Virtual Meeting Attendees AC Martin Hewitt NPCC Chair CC Andy Marsh Avon and Somerset CC Garry Forsyth Bedfordshire DCC Trevor Rodenhurst Bedfordshire
    [Show full text]
  • Press Contact List
    Contact Date Dates of Notification Press Releases Date Contacted Comments 1 2 3 4 5 5 Jun 2019 Press US X 5 Jun 2019 Press UK X 5 Jun 2019 Press Germany X 5 Jun 2019 Press France X 5 Jun 2019 Press Belgium (3 outlets) X 6 Jun 2019 Press Netherlands X 7-8 Jun 2019 Press Switzerland X 10 Jun 2019 Press Canada X 15 Jun 2019 Press Denmark X 16 Jun 2019 Press Norway X 18 Jun 2019 Press Poland X 20-21 Jun 2019 Press Finland X 21 Jun 2019 Police Germany X 21 Jun 2019 Police UK X 21 Jun 2019 Intel Germany X 21 Jun 2019 Intel UK X 21 Jun 2019 Intel Switzerland X 21 Jun 2019 Military Switzerland X 21 Jun 2019 NATO Space Command X 21 Jun 2019 US Space Command X 21 Jun 2019 EU Commission X 21 Jun 2019 EU Parliamentarians UK X 21 Jun 2019 EU Parliamentarians Finland X 21 Jun 2019 EU Parliamentarians Estonia X 22 Jun 2019 Intel US X 23 Jun 2019 EU Deputies X 23 Jun 2019 British MPs X Page 1 British MPs British Members of Parliament Press Release Contacts Email Contact Form Comments 1 2 3 4 5 United Kingdom Members of Parliament Ms Abbott [email protected] A LOT CONFIRMED X Debbie Abrahams [email protected] RECEIPT. CANNOT X Nigel Adams [email protected] LIST THEM ALL. X Bim Afolami [email protected] X Adam Afriyie [email protected] X Peter Aldous [email protected] X Rushanara Ali [email protected] X Lucy Allan [email protected] X Heidi Allen [email protected] X Dr Rosena Allin-Khan [email protected] X Mike Amesbury [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Document for Police and Crime Committee, 19/10/2020 14:00
    AGENDA Meeting Police and Crime Committee Date Monday 19 October 2020 Time 2.00 pm Place Virtual Meeting Copies of the reports and any attachments may be found at https://www.london.gov.uk/about-us/london-assembly/london-assembly-committees/police-and- crime-committee Most meetings of the London Assembly and its Committees are webcast live at www.london.gov.uk/about-us/london-assembly/youtube and www.london.gov.uk/mayor- assembly/london-assembly/webcasts where you can also view past meetings. Members of the Committee Unmesh Desai AM (Chair) Andrew Dismore AM Steve O'Connell AM (Deputy Chairman) Len Duvall AM Tony Arbour AM Susan Hall AM Jennette Arnold OBE AM Caroline Pidgeon MBE AM Siân Berry AM Peter Whittle AM A meeting of the Committee has been called by the Chair of the Committee to deal with the business listed below. Ed Williams, Executive Director of Secretariat Friday 9 October 2020 Note: This meeting has been called in accordance with the Local Authorities and Police and Crime Panels (Coronavirus) (Flexibility of Local Authority and Police and Crime Panel Meetings) (England and Wales) Regulations 2020. These regulations permit formal London Assembly meetings to be held on a virtual basis, with Assembly Members participating remotely, subject to certain conditions. The regulations apply notwithstanding any other legislation, current or pre-existing Standing Orders or any other rules of the Authority governing Assembly meetings, and remain valid until 7 May 2021. The meeting will be broadcast live via the web-link set out above. The regulations may be viewed here.] Further Information If you have questions, would like further information about the meeting or require special facilities please contact: Lauren Harvey, Senior Committee Officer; Telephone: 020 7983 4383; Email: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • 2019Csoh9.Pdf
    OUTER HOUSE, COURT OF SESSION [2019] CSOH 9 A63/15 OPINION OF LORD BRAILSFORD In the cause MRS K Pursuer against SIR STEPHEN HOUSE, CHIEF CONSTABLE OF THE POLICE SERVICE OF SCOTLAND Defender Pursuer: McBrearty QC, Campbell; BTO Solicitors Defender: Shand QC, Smart; Clyde & Co 31 January 2019 [1] This was an action of damages instituted by a former police officer against the Chief Constable for The Police Service of Scotland in which it was alleged that there was a failure to take reasonable care by Police Scotland in duties owed to their employees. The case for the pursuer as pled on record set forth a list of duties said to be incumbent upon the defender but as developed and presented at proof was ultimately limited to the following averments of duty: “It was the defender’s predecessor’s duty to take reasonable care for the safety of its employees, including the pursuer, and to avoid exposing them unnecessarily to the risk of injury.” (closed record 18B) 2 “It was their duty to afford her fair treatment in carrying out an investigation into her conduct and performance and to support her in her move to another department. It was their duty not to take disciplinary action against her or to move her permanently from her post without affording her fair treatment. The duties to afford the pursuer fair treatment as aforesaid required the defenders, amongst other things;… (ii) not to move her from her post, in particular, not to do so on the basis of preliminary findings which had not been the subject of proper investigations which she had not been made aware of and not had the opportunity to respond to; (iii) to advise her that her post had been re-advertised and provide her with an explanation therefor…”(closed record 18C-E) [2] Proof was restricted to liability and causation.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Original Attachment
    OFFICIAL Professional Committee 10 December 2019 Broadway House Conference Centre – Council Chamber room Tothill St, London, SW1H 9NQ Committee Meeting 11:00 – 14:00 Committee Members Mike Cunningham College CEO (Chair) Giles York Professional Development & Integrity Community Chair Andy Rhodes Organisational Development and International Chair/CPOSA Police Federation of England and Wales Police Federation of England and Wales Police Federation of England and Wales Dave Bamber Police Federation of England and Wales David Pedrick-Friend Association of Special Constabulary Chief Officers Ian Wylie Police Superintendents’ Association Alan Pughsley NPCC James Vaughan NPCC Stephen Mold Northamptonshire Police and Crime Commissioner Debbi Potter Unison Non-Voting Members Dan O’Mahoney NCA Andrew Tremayne APCC Helen Ball Metropolitan Police Val Harris Metropolitan Police Trade Union Side To present items Ray Clare Head of Workforce Development and Progression, Workforce Development Jo Noakes Director of Workforce Development Martin Hewitt Chair of the NPCC Professional Committee Meeting 10 December 2019 Agenda Page 1 of 3 Richard Bennett Uniformed Policing Faculty Lead Staff members in attendance Rachel Tuffin Director of Knowledge Research&Education Sharon Harrison Staff Officer to Mike Cunningham Phil Knox PSNI Janette McCormick Director of Policing Standards Bernie O'Reilly Director of Organisational Delivery and Change David Tucker Crime & Criminal Justice Faculty Lead Nerys Thomas Knowledge, Research and Practice Lead Helen Elderfield Head of Corporate Governance Jayshree Vekria Portfolio & Programme Officer Invited Observers Staff Officer to Alan Pughsley Apologies No. Title Lead at Status Timing meeting 1. Minutes and Actions of the Previous Mike Paper 11:00 – 11:10 Meeting Cunningham (10 mins) The previous meeting took place on 3rd September 2019 Fast Track Inspector to 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Met Follows the World While Maintaining Peel's Heritage
    The University of Akron IdeaExchange@UAkron The Dr. Gary B. and Pamela S. Williams Honors Honors Research Projects College Spring 2016 The etM Follows the World While Maintaining Peel’s Heritage Garrett .J J. Scherba The University of Akron, [email protected] Please take a moment to share how this work helps you through this survey. Your feedback will be important as we plan further development of our repository. Follow this and additional works at: http://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/honors_research_projects Part of the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation Scherba, Garrett .J J., "The eM t Follows the World While Maintaining Peel’s Heritage" (2016). Honors Research Projects. 272. http://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/honors_research_projects/272 This Honors Research Project is brought to you for free and open access by The Dr. Gary B. and Pamela S. Williams Honors College at IdeaExchange@UAkron, the institutional repository of The nivU ersity of Akron in Akron, Ohio, USA. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Research Projects by an authorized administrator of IdeaExchange@UAkron. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Running head: THE MET FOLLOWS THE WORLD 1 The Met Follows the World While Maintaining Peel’s Heritage Garrett J. J. Scherba The University of Akron Spring 2016 THE MET FOLLOWS THE WORLD 2 Abstract The London Metropolitan Police Department patrol officers do not regularly carry firearms in their routine duties. The members of the public and police each have opinions regarding this topic. The department’s history since its founding in 1829 developed strategies to engage with the public through community policing.
    [Show full text]
  • Guiding Principles on Use of Force
    CRITICAL ISSUES IN POLICING SERIES Guiding Principles On Use of Force SANCTITY OF LIFE • PROPORTIONALITY • DUTY TO INTERVENE • DE-ESCALATION • OFFICER SAFETY • DISTANCE + COVER = TIME • CRISIS INTERVENTION • CRITICAL DECISION-MAKING MODEL • CONTAIN AND NEGOTIATE • TIME IS ON OUR SIDE • TACTICAL COMMUNICATIONS • CHALLENGING CON- VENTIONAL THINKING • TACTICS • SCENARIO-BASED TRAINING • LESS-LETHAL OPTIONS • ETHICS • AGENCY VALUES • RENDER FIRST AID • OFFICER WELLNESS • TRAINING AS TEAMS • PERSONAL PROTECTION SHIELDS • SUPERVISORY RESPONSE • SLOWING THE SITUATION DOWN • TACTICAL REPOSITIONING • COMMUNITY-POLICE TRUST • POLICE CULTURE • SAFE ZONE • CALL-TAKERS AND DISPATCHERS • TRANSPARENCY • ACCOUNTABILITY Page intentionally blank CRITICAL ISSUES IN POLICING SERIES Guiding Principles on Use of Force March 2016 Cover photos: Left: New York Police Department Emergency Service Unit officers demonstrate a response to a mentally ill man barricaded in a room with a pickaxe (see page 103). Middle: In November 2015, Canden County, NJ officers responded to a man on the street brandishing a knife. The officers followed the man, kept a safe distance, and were able to safely arrest him when he dropped the knife. No shots were fired and no one was injured (see pp. 31–32). Video available here: https://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=YtVUMT9P8iw Right: Two Police Scotland officers demonstrate tactics for responding to a person wielding a bat (see pp. 88–113). This publication was supported by the Motorola Solutions Foundation. The points of view expressed herein are the authors’ and do not necessarily represent the opinions of the Motorola Solutions Foundation or all Police Executive Research Forum members. Police Executive Research Forum, Washington, D.C. 20036 Copyright © 2016 by Police Executive Research Forum All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-934485-33-0 Graphic design by Dave Williams.
    [Show full text]
  • Guiding Principles on Use of Force
    CRITICAL ISSUES IN POLICING SERIES Guiding Principles On Use of Force SANCTITY OF LIFE • PROPORTIONALITY • DUTY TO INTERVENE • DE-ESCALATION • OFFICER SAFETY • DISTANCE + COVER = TIME • CRISIS INTERVENTION • CRITICAL DECISION-MAKING MODEL • CONTAIN AND NEGOTIATE • TIME IS ON OUR SIDE • TACTICAL COMMUNICATIONS • CHALLENGING CON- VENTIONAL THINKING • TACTICS • SCENARIO-BASED TRAINING • LESS-LETHAL OPTIONS • ETHICS • AGENCY VALUES • RENDER FIRST AID • OFFICER WELLNESS • TRAINING AS TEAMS • PERSONAL PROTECTION SHIELDS • SUPERVISORY RESPONSE • SLOWING THE SITUATION DOWN • TACTICAL REPOSITIONING • COMMUNITY-POLICE TRUST • POLICE CULTURE • SAFE ZONE • CALL-TAKERS AND DISPATCHERS • TRANSPARENCY • ACCOUNTABILITY Page intentionally blank CRITICAL ISSUES IN POLICING SERIES Guiding Principles on Use of Force March 2016 Cover photos: Left: New York Police Department Emergency Service Unit officers demonstrate a response to a mentally ill man barricaded in a room with a pickaxe (see page 103). Middle: In November 2015, Canden County, NJ officers responded to a man on the street brandishing a knife. The officers followed the man, kept a safe distance, and were able to safely arrest him when he dropped the knife. No shots were fired and no one was injured (see pp. 31–32). Video available here: https://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=YtVUMT9P8iw Right: Two Police Scotland officers demonstrate tactics for responding to a person wielding a bat (see pp. 88–113). This publication was supported by the Motorola Solutions Foundation. The points of view expressed herein are the authors’ and do not necessarily represent the opinions of the Motorola Solutions Foundation or all Police Executive Research Forum members. Police Executive Research Forum, Washington, D.C. 20036 Copyright © 2016 by Police Executive Research Forum All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-934485-33-0 Graphic design by Dave Williams.
    [Show full text]
  • Opening Statement
    IN THE UNDERCOVER POLICING INQUIRY WRITTEN OPENING STATEMENT ON BEHALF OF ‘Alison’, ‘Bea’, ‘C’, ‘Ellie’, Denise Fuller, Donna, Belinda Harvey, ‘Jane’, ‘Jenny’, ‘Jessica’, ‘Lisa’, ‘Lizzie’, ‘Maya’, ‘Monica’, ‘Naomi’, ‘Rosa’, ‘Ruth’, ‘Sara’, Helen Steel, ‘Wendy’, Kate Wilson INTRODUCTION 1. This statement is made on behalf of eighteen women who were deceived into long- term intimate sexual relationships with undercover police officers [‘UCOs’], two women who were deceived into long-term close friendships which became sexual on one or more occasions; and one woman deceived into a close long-term friendship. Together they are hereafter referred to as ‘the women’. The earliest of these relationships began in 1985, the most recent ended in 2015. 2. These are not the only women who have been deceived into such relationships. There are now more than 30 women who know that they were deceived into such relationships by undercover police officers spying on campaign groups. Other women are represented separately in the Inquiry. At least one of those relationships (that of ‘Mary’ and ‘Rick Gibson’) dates back to 1975. 3. It is very likely that there are other women who are yet to discover that they are affected. The Inquiry has already led to a number of women, including 6 of those on whose behalf this statement is made, discovering that relationships which they had always believed to have been significant and genuine, were in fact police infiltrations. There may be many other women in the same position who do not yet know. The 1 extensive anonymity granted by the Inquiry to officers, including of their cover names, means that these women will continue to be denied the truth and thereby prevented from giving relevant evidence, so hampering the ability of the Inquiry to get to the truth about the frequency, nature and scale of these abuses.
    [Show full text]
  • London Assembly Police and Crime Committee – Wednesday, 4 September 2019
    Appendix 1 London Assembly Police and Crime Committee – Wednesday, 4 September 2019 Transcript of Item 5 – Question and Answer Session with the Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime and the Metropolitan Police Service Unmesh Desai AM (Chair): We now move to our main item of business, which is our monthly question and answer session with the Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime (MOPAC) and the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). I would like to welcome our guests, Sophie Linden, Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime, and Sir Stephen House, Deputy Commissioner of the MPS. At 11.00am we will be joined by Claire Waxman, Victims’ Commissioner for London. We have shifted the agenda around to accommodate Claire. We will start off with questions from me on Notting Hill Carnival. Deputy Commissioner, could you give me your assessment of the success of Carnival this year from a policing perspective and then also your thoughts on the Metropolitan Police Federation’s call for a review of Carnival after a number of police officers were assaulted during the event. I will invite you, Deputy Mayor, to come in on that particular point as well, but if I can start off with you, Sir Stephen? Sir Stephen House QPM (Deputy Commissioner, Metropolitan Police Service): Thank you, Chair. In terms of the figures, which is one way of analysing Carnival, these are the definitive figures as we have them at this moment in time. There were 478 offences recorded with a Carnival flag on them, which is down significantly on 2018. We saw, as always, that the highest number of offences were drugs offences at 193 drugs offences.
    [Show full text]