Threatened Species Nomination 2020 Squalus Chloroculus

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Threatened Species Nomination 2020 Details of the nominated species or subspecies NAME OF SPECIES (OR SUBSPECIES) Scientific name: Squalus chloroculus Common name(s): Greeneye Spurdog, Greeneye Dogfish TAXONOMY Provide any relevant detail on the species' taxonomy (e.g. authors of taxon or naming authority, year and reference; synonyms; Family and Order). Squalus chloroculus (Last, White and Motomura 2007). Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata Class: Chondrichthyans Subclass: Elasmobranchii Order: Squaliformes (Bramble, sleeper and dogfish sharks) Family: Squalidae (Dogfish sharks) Genus: Squalus Species: Chloroculus Dogfish species of the Squalus genus are small sharks with slow molecular evolution (Daley-Engel et al. 2018). For this reason they have been generally classified within species complexes. In 1994 the “greeneye spurdog” was classed as conspecific with other dogfish in the ‘mitsukurii’ complex (Last and Stevens 1994). Although comparatively low between-species diversity exists within this genus (Daley-Engel et al. 2018), molecular analysis has since revealed S. chloroculus to be a unique species endemic to south-eastern Australia (Last et al. 2007; Last and Stevens 2009). Distinguishing between similar species is possible morphometrically and from its geographical distribution (see Description), although records from the northern-most part of their range (in New South Wales; NSW) show some range overlap with other Squalus species. Many historical (and some contemporary) records do not make the distinction and care must be taken when referring to these records for population analysis due to previous uncertainty of the Squalus taxonomy. This species is not known to hybridise with others. CONVENTIONALLY ACCEPTED Is the species’ taxonomy conventionally accepted? Yes No If the species is not conventionally accepted please provide the following information required by the EPBC Regulations 2000: • a taxonomic description of the species in a form suitable for publication in conventional scientific literature; OR • evidence that a scientific institution has a specimen of the species, and a written statement signed by a person who is a taxonomist and has relevant expertise (has worked with, or is a published author on, the class of species nominated), that the species is considered to be a new species. n.a. Page 2 of 19 DESCRIPTION Provide a description of the species including where relevant, distinguishing features, size and social structure How distinct is this species in its appearance from other species? How likely is it to be misidentified? Squalus chloroculus is a large deep-water dogfish, attaining around 990mm total length (TL; Figure 1). It has characteristically vivid green eyes (when alive or fresh). Its body is fusiform, relatively elongated and stocky, with a prominently humped nape (Last et al. 2007). It has a relatively broad head, with a moderately elongated snout (Last et al. 2007). It has small nostrils, moderately sized eyes and spiracles, and an almost transverse mouth (Last et al. 2007). Its first dorsal fin is larger than the second, which is located on the tail. It is generally uniformly grey, with black margins on its dorsal fins, and black and white patterning on the caudal fin (although these colorations can vary; Last et al. 2007). The tricuspid flank denticles are very small (Last et al. 2007). Although it shares morphological similarities with other Squalus species, it can be distinguished by several features. Its broad head and the position and size of the dorsal fins are distinctive from S. montalbani (Philippine spurdog; Last et al. 2007). It has different caudal fin coloration to S. mitsukurii (Shortspine spurdog) and a lower vertebral count (Last et al. 2007). Identification may only be problematic in the northern-most part of its range in NSW where these species are partially sympatric. The social structure of S. chloroculus is unknown. DISTRIBUTION Provide a succinct overview of the species’ known or estimated current and past distribution, including international/national distribution. Provide a map if available. Is the species protected within the reserve system (e.g. national parks, Indigenous Protected Areas, or other conservation estates, private land covenants, etc.)? If so, which populations? Which reserves are actively managed for this species? Give details. Squalus chloroculus is one of 11 Australian Squalus species and is endemic to the temperate waters of south-eastern and southern Australia (Last et al. 2007). Its range is restricted to upper and mid-continental slope habitats, from Jervis Bay in New South Wales (ca. to the Great Australian Bight (Eucla, Western Australia; Last et al. 2007; Last et al. 2009). The daily and seasonal movements of S. chloroculus are not well understood. Some Squalus species are known to migrate and have strong diel movement patterns and clear home ranges (Carlson et al. 2014) but this has yet to be investigated in this species. One study found S. chloroculus to have travelled up to 480km from where it had been fitted with an acoustic tag (Daley et al. 2009). There is some evidence for spatial age segregation. Using trawls and lines, Rochowski et al. (2015) caught only mature adults, despite catches of small sharks of other species. This may occur in other Squalus species, for example Campagno et al. (1991) found separate pupping groups in Squalus megalops. Spatial partitioning such as this has implications for how fisheries impact on demographics and how populations might respond to management actions. There are no captive breeding populations or proposed re-introduction plans. This species does not occur in any EPBC listed ecological communities. The < 700m depth exclusion introduced in 2007 for all Commonwealth fishing licenced operators (750m in the Great Australian Bight) may provide some refuge. Deepwater dogfish fishing exclusion areas in NSW (NSW Government Official Notice 29 April 2011), as well as larger marine park designations (for example the South-East Marine Parks network in 2007) that prohibit demersal otter trawls (amongst other methods) are also likely to have some benefit for S. chloroculus (Walker and Rochowski 2019). However only around 19.1 per cent of its range falls within Australian marine parks, and of this, only three per cent overlaps with fishery exclusion zones (Heupel et al. 2018). Further, these protected areas are not managed for this species, and systematic monitoring in place to determine the efficacy of such protection specifically for S. chloroculus. Page 3 of 19 BIOLOGY/ECOLOGY Provide a summary of biological and ecological information. Include information required by the EPBC Regulations 2000 on: • life cycle including age at sexual maturity, life expectancy, natural mortality rates • specific biological characteristics • habitat requirements for the species • for fauna: feeding behaviour and food preference and daily seasonal movement patterns • for flora: pollination and seed dispersal patterns S. chloroculus shows female-biased sexual size dimorphism, and both sexes mature slowly. Females grow to around 990mm TL and have been known to live for 26 years. They reach maturity at 799mm TL at around 9-12 years (Last and Stevens 2009; Rochowski et al. 2015). Males grow to 856mm TL with a 24-year lifespan, reaching maturity at 629mm TL at around 16 years old (Last and Stevens 2009; Rochowski et al. 2015). The generation length is 21 years (determined by female age at maturity and longevity; Walker and Rochowski 2019). Natural mortality rates are unknown. Females have a triennial reproductive cycle (Rochowski et al. 2015), with the longest known gestation period of any species (31 - 34 months; Rochowski et al. 2015). This means that each year, only around one third of females will give birth, contributing to a low overall recruitment rate. The conditions needed for breeding are not known, however the female reproductive cycle is seasonal (births from September to December) and the males are likely to be in breeding condition year round (Rochowski et al. 2015). Pups are born at 250mm and litter sizes range from 4 to 15 embryos (average of 9), with a 1:1 sex ratio (Rochowski et al. 2015). Typical breeding success is not known, however higher fecundity (larger litters) has been found more prevalent in larger maternal females (Rochowski et al. 2015), making the species susceptible to length-selective fishing practices (where larger individuals are more likely to be harvested). Further, the continuous male reproductive cycle may be an indication of low mating probability, typical of species living in deeper waters (see Rochowski et al. 2015). Given its longevity, late onset of maturity, triennial reproduction, long gestation period and relatively low fecundity, the species is considered to have very low biological productivity and this makes it highly vulnerable to population loss. Rochowski et al. (2015) observed that TL at maturity varies before and after severe length-selective fishing mortality (potentially biasing reproductive length estimates), demonstrating that fishing impacts may also have sublethal recruitment impacts. S. chloroculus is a bathydemersal species, occurring on both hard and soft substrate on the upper to mid- continental slope at depths of 216 to 1360m (Last et al. 2009). Its habitat use and diet are not well understood, but some Squalus species prey on benthic and demersal teleosts, crustaceans, cephalopods and molluscs (for example, Braccini et al. 2005; Dunn et al. 2013), and this may
Recommended publications
  • Shark Cartilage, Cancer and the Growing Threat of Pseudoscience

    Shark Cartilage, Cancer and the Growing Threat of Pseudoscience

    [CANCER RESEARCH 64, 8485–8491, December 1, 2004] Review Shark Cartilage, Cancer and the Growing Threat of Pseudoscience Gary K. Ostrander,1 Keith C. Cheng,2 Jeffrey C. Wolf,3 and Marilyn J. Wolfe3 1Department of Biology and Department of Comparative Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; 2Jake Gittlen Cancer Research Institute, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania; and 3Registry of Tumors in Lower Animals, Experimental Pathology Laboratories, Inc., Sterling, Virginia Abstract primary justification for using crude shark cartilage extracts to treat cancer is based on the misconception that sharks do not, or infre- The promotion of crude shark cartilage extracts as a cure for cancer quently, develop cancer. Other justifications represent overextensions has contributed to at least two significant negative outcomes: a dramatic of experimental observations: concentrated extracts of cartilage can decline in shark populations and a diversion of patients from effective cancer treatments. An alleged lack of cancer in sharks constitutes a key inhibit tumor vessel formation and tumor invasions (e.g., refs. 2–5). justification for its use. Herein, both malignant and benign neoplasms of No available data or arguments support the medicinal use of crude sharks and their relatives are described, including previously unreported shark extracts to treat cancer (6). cases from the Registry of Tumors in Lower Animals, and two sharks with The claims that sharks do not, or rarely, get cancer was originally two cancers each. Additional justifications for using shark cartilage are argued by I. William Lane in a book entitled “Sharks Don’t Get illogical extensions of the finding of antiangiogenic and anti-invasive Cancer” in 1992 (7), publicized in “60 Minutes” television segments substances in cartilage.
  • Sharks in Crisis: a Call to Action for the Mediterranean

    Sharks in Crisis: a Call to Action for the Mediterranean

    REPORT 2019 SHARKS IN CRISIS: A CALL TO ACTION FOR THE MEDITERRANEAN WWF Sharks in the Mediterranean 2019 | 1 fp SECTION 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Written and edited by WWF Mediterranean Marine Initiative / Evan Jeffries (www.swim2birds.co.uk), based on data contained in: Bartolí, A., Polti, S., Niedermüller, S.K. & García, R. 2018. Sharks in the Mediterranean: A review of the literature on the current state of scientific knowledge, conservation measures and management policies and instruments. Design by Catherine Perry (www.swim2birds.co.uk) Front cover photo: Blue shark (Prionace glauca) © Joost van Uffelen / WWF References and sources are available online at www.wwfmmi.org Published in July 2019 by WWF – World Wide Fund For Nature Any reproduction in full or in part must mention the title and credit the WWF Mediterranean Marine Initiative as the copyright owner. © Text 2019 WWF. All rights reserved. Our thanks go to the following people for their invaluable comments and contributions to this report: Fabrizio Serena, Monica Barone, Adi Barash (M.E.C.O.), Ioannis Giovos (iSea), Pamela Mason (SharkLab Malta), Ali Hood (Sharktrust), Matthieu Lapinksi (AILERONS association), Sandrine Polti, Alex Bartoli, Raul Garcia, Alessandro Buzzi, Giulia Prato, Jose Luis Garcia Varas, Ayse Oruc, Danijel Kanski, Antigoni Foutsi, Théa Jacob, Sofiane Mahjoub, Sarah Fagnani, Heike Zidowitz, Philipp Kanstinger, Andy Cornish and Marco Costantini. Special acknowledgements go to WWF-Spain for funding this report. KEY CONTACTS Giuseppe Di Carlo Director WWF Mediterranean Marine Initiative Email: [email protected] Simone Niedermueller Mediterranean Shark expert Email: [email protected] Stefania Campogianni Communications manager WWF Mediterranean Marine Initiative Email: [email protected] WWF is one of the world’s largest and most respected independent conservation organizations, with more than 5 million supporters and a global network active in over 100 countries.
  • 1 an Annotated Checklist of the Chondrichthyans of South Africa 1 2 3

    1 an Annotated Checklist of the Chondrichthyans of South Africa 1 2 3

    1 An annotated checklist of the chondrichthyans of South Africa 2 3 4 DAVID A. EBERT1, 2, 3, 6, SABINE P. WINTNER4 & PETER M. KYNE5 5 6 1 Pacific Shark Research Center, Moss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss Landing, 7 USA 8 2 South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity, Grahamstown, South Africa 9 3 Department of Ichthyology, California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, USA 10 4 University of KwaZulu-Natal, School of Life Sciences, Durban, South Africa 11 5 Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, 12 Darwin, Australia 13 14 6 Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected] 15 16 David A. Ebert ORCID ID 0000-0003-4604-8192 17 Sabine P. Wintner ORCID ID 0000-0001-7350-5999 18 Peter M. Kyne ORCID ID 0000-0003-4494-2625 19 20 21 1 1 Abstract 2 3 An annotated checklist of chondrichthyan fishes (sharks, batoids, and chimaeras) 4 occurring in South African waters is presented. The checklist is the result of decades of 5 research and on-going systematic revisions of the regional fauna. The chondrichthyan 6 fauna of South Africa is one of the richest in the world with 191 species, comprising 50 7 families and 103 genera. It consists of 30 families, 64 genera, and 111 species of sharks; 8 17 families, 36 genera, and 72 species of batoids; and, 3 families, 5 genera, and 8 species 9 of chimaeras. The most species-rich shark families are the whaler sharks Carcharhinidae 10 with 20 species followed by the deepwater catsharks Pentanchidae with 13 species.
  • © Iccat, 2007

    © Iccat, 2007

    A5 By-catch Species APPENDIX 5: BY-CATCH SPECIES A.5 By-catch species By-catch is the unintentional/incidental capture of non-target species during fishing operations. Different types of fisheries have different types and levels of by-catch, depending on the gear used, the time, area and depth fished, etc. Article IV of the Convention states: "the Commission shall be responsible for the study of the population of tuna and tuna-like fishes (the Scombriformes with the exception of Trichiuridae and Gempylidae and the genus Scomber) and such other species of fishes exploited in tuna fishing in the Convention area as are not under investigation by another international fishery organization". The following is a list of by-catch species recorded as being ever caught by any major tuna fishery in the Atlantic/Mediterranean. Note that the lists are qualitative and are not indicative of quantity or mortality. Thus, the presence of a species in the lists does not imply that it is caught in significant quantities, or that individuals that are caught necessarily die. Skates and rays Scientific names Common name Code LL GILL PS BB HARP TRAP OTHER Dasyatis centroura Roughtail stingray RDC X Dasyatis violacea Pelagic stingray PLS X X X X Manta birostris Manta ray RMB X X X Mobula hypostoma RMH X Mobula lucasana X Mobula mobular Devil ray RMM X X X X X Myliobatis aquila Common eagle ray MYL X X Pteuromylaeus bovinus Bull ray MPO X X Raja fullonica Shagreen ray RJF X Raja straeleni Spotted skate RFL X Rhinoptera spp Cownose ray X Torpedo nobiliana Torpedo
  • Evidence of High Genetic Connectivity for the Longnose Spurdog Squalus Blainville in the Mediterranean Sea V

    Evidence of High Genetic Connectivity for the Longnose Spurdog Squalus Blainville in the Mediterranean Sea V

    Research Article Mediterranean Marine Science Indexed in WoS (Web of Science, ISI Thomson) and SCOPUS The journal is available on line at http://www.medit-mar-sc.net DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12681/mms.1222 Evidence of high genetic connectivity for the longnose spurdog Squalus blainville in the Mediterranean Sea V. KOUSTENI1, P. KASAPIDIS2, G. KOTOULAS2 and P. MEGALOFONOU1 1 Faculty of Biology, Department of Zoology-Marine Biology, University of Athens, Panepistimiopolis, Ilisia, 15784 Athens, Greece 2 Institute of Marine Biology, Biotechnology and Aquaculture, Hellenic Centre for Marine Research (HCMR), P.O. Box 2214, 71003 Heraklion, Greece Corresponding author: [email protected] Handling Editor: Fabrizio Serena Received: 19 January 2015; Accepted: 20 December 2015; Published on line: 14 March 2016 Abstract Squalus blainville is one of the least studied Mediterranean shark species. Despite being intensively fished in several loca- tions, biological knowledge is limited and no genetic structure information is available. This is the first study to examine the ge- netic structure of S. blainville in the Mediterranean Sea. Considering the high dispersal potential inferred for other squalid sharks, the hypothesis of panmixia was tested based on a 585 bp fragment of the mitochondrial DNA cytochrome c oxidase subunit I gene from 107 individuals and six nuclear microsatellite loci from 577 individuals. Samples were collected across the Ionian, Aegean and Libyan Seas and off the Balearic Islands. Twenty three additional sequences of Mediterranean and South African origin were retrieved from GenBank and included in the mitochondrial DNA analysis. The overall haplotype diversity was high, in contrast to the low nucleotide diversity.
  • Identification Guide to the Deep-Sea Cartilaginous Fishes Of

    Identification Guide to the Deep-Sea Cartilaginous Fishes Of

    Identification guide to the deep–sea cartilaginous fishes of the Southeastern Atlantic Ocean FAO. 2015. Identification guide to the deep–sea cartilaginous fishes of the Southeastern Atlantic Ocean. FishFinder Programme, by Ebert, D.A. and Mostarda, E., Rome, Italy. Supervision: Merete Tandstad, Jessica Sanders (FAO, Rome) Technical editor: Edoardo Mostarda (FAO, Rome) Colour illustrations, cover and graphic design: Emanuela D’Antoni (FAO, Rome) This guide was prepared under the “FAO Deep–sea Fisheries Programme” thanks to a generous funding from the Government of Norway (Support to the implementation of the International Guidelines on the Management of Deep-Sea Fisheries in the High Seas project) for the purpose of assisting states, institutions, the fishing industry and RFMO/As in the implementation of FAO International Guidelines for the Management of Deep-sea Fisheries in the High Seas. It was developed in close collaboration with the FishFinder Programme of the Marine and Inland Fisheries Branch, Fisheries Department, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). The present guide covers the deep–sea Southeastern Atlantic Ocean and that portion of Southwestern Indian Ocean from 18°42’E to 30°00’E (FAO Fishing Area 47). It includes a selection of cartilaginous fish species of major, moderate and minor importance to fisheries as well as those of doubtful or potential use to fisheries. It also covers those little known species that may be of research, educational, and ecological importance. In this region, the deep–sea chondrichthyan fauna is currently represented by 50 shark, 20 batoid and 8 chimaera species. This guide includes full species accounts for 37 shark, 9 batoid and 4 chimaera species selected as being the more difficult to identify and/or commonly caught.
  • Coelho Phd Lantern S

    Coelho Phd Lantern S

    UNIVERSIDADEdo ALGARVE FaculdadedeCiênciasdoMaredo Ambiente Biology,populationdynamics,managementandconservation ofdeepwaterlanternsharks,Etmopterusspinax and Etmopteruspusillus (Chondrichthyes:Etmopteridae)insouthernPortugal(northeastAtlantic). (DoutoramentoemCiênciaseTecnologiasdasPescas,especialidadedeBiologiaPesqueira) (ThesisforthedegreeinDoctorofPhilosophyinFisheriesSciencesandTechnologies,specialtyinFisheriesBiology) RUIPEDROANDRADECOELHO Faro (2007) UNIVERSIDADE DO ALGARVE FACULDADE DE CIÊNCIAS DO MAR E DO AMBIENTE Biology, population dynamics, management and conservation of deep water lantern sharks, Etmopterus spinax and Etmopterus pusillus (Chondrichthyes: Etmopteridae) in southern Portugal (northeast Atlantic). (Doutoramento em Ciências e Tecnologias das Pescas, especialidade de Biologia Pesqueira) (Thesis for the degree in Doctor of Philosophy in Fisheries Sciences and Technologies, specialty in Fisheries Biology) RUI PEDRO ANDRADE COELHO Orientador / Supervisor: Prof. Doutor Karim Erzini Júri / Jury: - Prof. Doutor José Pedro Andrade, Professor Catedrático da Faculdade de Ciências do Mar e do Ambiente, Universidade do Algarve; - Prof. Doutor Karim Erzini, Professor Associado com Agregação da Faculdade de Ciências do Mar e do Ambiente, Universidade do Algarve; - Prof. Doutor Leonel Paulo Sul de Serrano Gordo, Professor Auxiliar com Agregação da Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa; - Prof. Doutor Manuel Seixas Afonso Dias, Professor Auxiliar da Faculdade de Ciências do Mar e do Ambiente, Universidade do Algarve;
  • Report on the Status of Mediterranean Chondrichthyan Species

    Report on the Status of Mediterranean Chondrichthyan Species

    United Nations Environment Programme Mediterranean Action Plan Regional Activity Centre For Specially Protected Areas REPORT ON THE STATUS OF MEDITERRANEAN CHONDRICHTHYAN SPECIES D. CEBRIAN © L. MASTRAGOSTINO © R. DUPUY DE LA GRANDRIVE © Note : The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP concerning the legal status of any State, Territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of their frontiers or boundaries. © 2007 United Nations Environment Programme Mediterranean Action Plan Regional Activity Centre for Specially Protected Areas (RAC/SPA) Boulevard du leader Yasser Arafat B.P.337 –1080 Tunis CEDEX E-mail : [email protected] Citation: UNEP-MAP RAC/SPA, 2007. Report on the status of Mediterranean chondrichthyan species. By Melendez, M.J. & D. Macias, IEO. Ed. RAC/SPA, Tunis. 241pp The original version (English) of this document has been prepared for the Regional Activity Centre for Specially Protected Areas (RAC/SPA) by : Mª José Melendez (Degree in Marine Sciences) & A. David Macías (PhD. in Biological Sciences). IEO. (Instituto Español de Oceanografía). Sede Central Spanish Ministry of Education and Science Avda. de Brasil, 31 Madrid Spain [email protected] 2 INDEX 1. INTRODUCTION 3 2. CONSERVATION AND PROTECTION 3 3. HUMAN IMPACTS ON SHARKS 8 3.1 Over-fishing 8 3.2 Shark Finning 8 3.3 By-catch 8 3.4 Pollution 8 3.5 Habitat Loss and Degradation 9 4. CONSERVATION PRIORITIES FOR MEDITERRANEAN SHARKS 9 REFERENCES 10 ANNEX I. LIST OF CHONDRICHTHYAN OF THE MEDITERRANEAN SEA 11 1 1.
  • Elasmobranch Biodiversity, Conservation and Management Proceedings of the International Seminar and Workshop, Sabah, Malaysia, July 1997

    Elasmobranch Biodiversity, Conservation and Management Proceedings of the International Seminar and Workshop, Sabah, Malaysia, July 1997

    The IUCN Species Survival Commission Elasmobranch Biodiversity, Conservation and Management Proceedings of the International Seminar and Workshop, Sabah, Malaysia, July 1997 Edited by Sarah L. Fowler, Tim M. Reed and Frances A. Dipper Occasional Paper of the IUCN Species Survival Commission No. 25 IUCN The World Conservation Union Donors to the SSC Conservation Communications Programme and Elasmobranch Biodiversity, Conservation and Management: Proceedings of the International Seminar and Workshop, Sabah, Malaysia, July 1997 The IUCN/Species Survival Commission is committed to communicate important species conservation information to natural resource managers, decision-makers and others whose actions affect the conservation of biodiversity. The SSC's Action Plans, Occasional Papers, newsletter Species and other publications are supported by a wide variety of generous donors including: The Sultanate of Oman established the Peter Scott IUCN/SSC Action Plan Fund in 1990. The Fund supports Action Plan development and implementation. To date, more than 80 grants have been made from the Fund to SSC Specialist Groups. The SSC is grateful to the Sultanate of Oman for its confidence in and support for species conservation worldwide. The Council of Agriculture (COA), Taiwan has awarded major grants to the SSC's Wildlife Trade Programme and Conservation Communications Programme. This support has enabled SSC to continue its valuable technical advisory service to the Parties to CITES as well as to the larger global conservation community. Among other responsibilities, the COA is in charge of matters concerning the designation and management of nature reserves, conservation of wildlife and their habitats, conservation of natural landscapes, coordination of law enforcement efforts as well as promotion of conservation education, research and international cooperation.
  • Greeneye Spurdog, Squalus Chloroculus

    Greeneye Spurdog, Squalus Chloroculus

    Published Date: 1 March 2019 Greeneye Spurdog, Squalus chloroculus Report Card Recovering assessment IUCN Red List IUCN Red List Australian Endemic to Australia Global Near Threatened Assessment Assessment Assessors Walker, T.I. Management measures are expected to rehabilitate depleted Report Card Remarks populations Summary The Greeneye Spurdog is a large, deepwater endemic dogfish from southeast Australia. The species has low biological productivity due to its high longevity and low reproductive output. Fishing was intense in some Source: CSIRO National Fish Collection. License: CC BY Attribution areas where it has caused severe population reductions. Fishing intensity has since reduced, and management measures such as a low combined Total Allowable Catch of all deepwater dogfish in southeast Australia and a network of refuges have stabilised the population. The management actions are expected to rehabilitate the population. Therefore, the Greeneye Spurdog is assessed as Near Threatened (IUCN) and Transitional Recovering (SAFS). Distribution The Greeneye Spurdog occurs off southern Australia from New South Wales (NSW) to the Great Australian Bight (Last and Stevens 2009). Stock structure and status The Greeneye Spurdog is a recently described species (Last et al. 2007). The relative abundance of populations has varied widely across its distribution range with localised depletion in some localities and comparatively high abundance in others (Walker and Gason 2007). Declines in the population indicated by both fishery-dependent monitoring and fishery-independent scientific surveys show that Greeneye Spurdog is vulnerable to rapid population decline where it is heavily fished. Fisheries The primary threat to the Greeneye Spurdog is fishing. Fishing is intensive on trawl grounds around southeast Australia, where there is evidence that this species has been severely depleted in some localities, but less so in others.
  • 04 WGEF Report

    04 WGEF Report

    36 | ICES WGEF REPORT 2017 2 Spurdog in the Northeast Atlantic 2.1 Stock distribution Spurdog Squalus acanthias has a worldwide distribution in temperate and boreal wa- ters, and occurs mainly in depths of 10–200 m. In the NE Atlantic, this species is found from Iceland and the Barents Sea southwards to the coast of Northwest Africa (McEachran and Branstetter, 1984). WGEF considers that there is a single NE Atlantic stock ranging from the Barents Sea (Subarea 1) to the Bay of Biscay (Subarea 8), and that this is the most appropriate unit for assessment and management within ICES. Spurdog in Subarea 9 may be part of the NE Atlantic stock, but catches from this area are likely to consist of a mixture of Squalus species, with increasing numbers of Squalus blainville further south. Genetic microsatellite analyses conducted by Verissimo et al. (2010) found no differ- ences between East and Wwest Atlantic spurdog. The authors suggested this could be accomplished by transatlantic migrations of a very limited number of individuals. Fur- ther information on the stock structure and migratory pattern of Northeast Atlantic spurdog can be found in the Stock Annex. 2.2 The fishery 2.2.1 History of the fishery Spurdog has a long history of exploitation in the Northeast Atlantic (Pawson et al., 2009) and WGEF estimates of total landings are shown in Figure 2.1a and Table 2.1. Spurdog has historically been exploited by France, Ireland, Norway and the UK (Fig- ure 2.1b and Table 2.2). The main fishing grounds for the NE Atlantic stock of spurdog are the North Sea (Subarea 4), West of Scotland (Division 6.a) and the Celtic Seas (Sub- area 7) and, during the decade spanning the late 1980s to 1990s, the Norwegian Sea (Subarea 2) (Table 2.3).
  • Rapid Assessment of Sustainability for Ecological Risk of Shark and Other

    Rapid Assessment of Sustainability for Ecological Risk of Shark and Other

    Rapid assessment of sustainability for ecological risk of shark and other chondrichthyan bycatch species taken in the Southern and Eastern Scalefish and Shark Fishery Terence I. Walker, John D. Stevens, J. Matias Braccini, Ross K. Daley, Charlie Huveneers, Sarah B. Irvine, Justin D. Bell, Javier Tovar‐Ávila, Fabian I. Trinnie, David T. Phillips, Michelle A. Treloar, Cynthia A. Awruck, Anne S. Gason, John Salini, and William C. Hamlett Project No. 2002/033 Rapid assessment of sustainability for ecological risk of shark and other chondrichthyan bycatch species taken in the Southern and Eastern Scalefish and Shark Fishery Terence I. Walker, John D. Stevens, J. Matias Braccini, Ross K. Daley, Charlie Huveneers, Sarah B. Irvine, Justin D. Bell, Javier Tovar‐ Ávila, Fabian I. Trinnie, David T. Phillips, Michelle A. Treloar, Cynthia A. Awruck, Anne S. Gason, John Salini, and William C. Hamlett July 2008 Project Number 2002/033 Rapid assessment of sustainability for ecological risk of shark and other chondrichthyan bycatch species taken in the Southern and Eastern Scalefish and Shark Fishery FRDC Report 2002/033 Terence I. Walker, John D. Stevens, J. Matias Braccini, Ross J. Daley, Charlie Huveneers, Sarah B. Irvine, Justin D. Bell, Javier Tovar‐ Ávila, Fabian I. Trinnie, David T. Phillips, Michelle A. Treloar, Cynthia A. Awruck, Anne S. Gason, John Salini, and Hamlett, W. C. Published by Department of Primary Industries, Fisheries Research Brand, Queenscliff, Victoria, 3225. © Fisheries Research and Development Corporation, and Fisheries Victoria. 2008 This work is copyright. Except as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), no part of this publication may be reproduced by any process, electronic or otherwise, without the specific written permission of the copyright owners.