DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:2001.10477V3 [Quant-Ph]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:2001.10477V3 [Quant-Ph] Statistical Limits of Supervised Quantum Learning Carlo Ciliberto,1 Andrea Rocchetto,2, 3 Alessandro Rudi,4 and Leonard Wossnig5, 6 1Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2BT, United Kingdom 2Department of Computer Science, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA 3Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA 4INRIA - Sierra project team, Paris 75012, France 5Department of Computer Science, University College London, London WC1E 6EA, United Kingdom 6Rahko Limited, N4 3JP London, United Kingdom Within the framework of statistical learning theory it is possible to bound the minimum number of samples required by a learner to reach a target accuracy. We show that if the bound on the accuracy is taken into account, quantum machine learning algorithms for supervised learning—for which statistical guarantees are available—cannot achieve polylogarithmic runtimes in the input dimension. We conclude that, when no further assumptions on the problem are made, quantum machine learning algorithms for supervised learning can have at most polynomial speedups over efficient classical algorithms, even in cases where quantum access to the data is naturally available. A wide class of quantum algorithms for supervised learning variants. problems(where the goal is to infer a mapping given examples Finally, we note that our results do not assume any prior of an input-outputrelation) exploit fast quantum linear algebra knowledge on the function to be learned. This allows us to subroutines to achieve runtimes that are exponentially faster make statements on virtually every possible learning algo- than their classical counterparts [1, 2]. Examples of these al- rithm, including neural networks. Using stronger assumptions gorithms are quantum support vector machines [3], quantum on the target function it is possible to improve the dependency linear regression [4, 5], and quantum least squares [6, 7]. of the accuracy in number of samples (consider the limit case A careful analysis of these algorithms identified a number where the function is known, here zero samples can determine of caveats that limit their practical applicability such as the the function with maximum accuracy). need for a strong form of quantum access to the input data, restrictions on structural properties of the data matrix (such Statistical Learning Theory. The field of statistical learning as condition number or sparsity), and modes of access to the theory investigates how to quantify the statistical resources output [8]. Furthermore, if one assumes that it is efficient to required to solve a learning problem [16]. In this work, we (classically) sample elements of the training data in a way pro- consider supervised learning settings where the goal is to find portional to their norm, then it is possible to show that classi- a model that fits well a set of input-output training examples cal algorithms are only polynomiallyslower (albeit the scaling but that, more importantly, guarantees good prediction perfor- of the quantum algorithms can be considerably better) [9–13]. mance on new observations. This latter property, also known In this paper we continue to investigate the limitations of as generalisation capability of the learned model, is a key as- quantum algorithms for supervised learning problems. Our pect separating machine learning from the standard optimisa- analysis focuses on the dependency on the size of the data set tion literature. Indeed, while data fitting is often approached that is introduced when considering the statistical guarantees as an optimisation problem in practice, the focus of machine of the estimators. The key elements of our work are a series learning is to design statistical estimators able to ‘fit’ well fu- of well known results in statistical learning theory that show ture examples. More formally, let ρ be a distribution over X Y, with X a arXiv:2001.10477v3 [quant-ph] 29 Oct 2020 how the accuracy parameter of a supervised learning problem × scales inverse polynomially with the number of samples in the so-called domain (or input) set and Y a label (or output) set. training set. We leverage on these insights to show that quan- The goal of supervised learning is to produce a hypothesis f : X Y such that the expected risk or expected error tum learning algorithms must have at least polynomial run- → time in the dimension of the training data and therefore can- ( f ) := Eρ ℓ(y, f (x)) (1) not achieve exponential speedups over classical polynomial E time machine learning algorithms. We remark that our results is small with respect to a suitable loss function ℓ : Y Y R do not rule out exponential advantages for learning problem measuring prediction errors. However, in practice, the× tar→get where no efficient classical algorithms are known. In fact, in distribution ρ is unknown and only accessible by means of a this regime, there exist learning problems for which quantum finite training set S n = (xi, yi), i = 1,..., n of i.i.d. points algorithms have a superopolynomial advantage [14, 15]. sampled from it. { } Our results are independent of the modes of access to the Depending on whether the label set Y is dense or discrete training data, that is, even if the data set is naturally stored the task is called regression (dense) or classification (discrete). in a quantum structure, quantum machine learning algorithms Typical loss functions are the quadratic loss ℓsq( f (x), y) = can have at most polynomial advantage over their classical ( f (x) y)2 over Y = R for regression and the 0 1 loss − − 2 3 ℓ0 1( f (x), y) = 1 f (x),y over Y = 1, 1 for classification. or SVM, the computational time is therefore (n ), which is −Different machine learning frameworks{− } have different pre- similar to the time it requires to invert a squareO matrix that has scriptions on how to choose the hypothesis f . The Empirical size equal to the number n of examples in the training set. No- Risk Minimisation (ERM) framework prescribes to choose a tably this can be improved depending on the sparsity and the hypothesis that minimises the empirical risk conditioning of the specific optimisation problem. To reduce the computational cost, instead of considering 1 inf ˆ( f ), ˆ( f ) = ℓ(yi, f (xi)), (2) the optimisation problem as a separate process from the sta- f E E n ∈H (xX,y ) T tistical one, more recent methods hinge on the intuition that i i ∈ reducing the computational burden of the learning algorithm over a suitable hypotheses space . Under weak assumptions can be interpreted as a form of regularisation on its own. For on (for instance a bounded subsetH of a Hilbert space [16]). H instance, early stopping approaches are now widely used in it is possible to guarantee the existence of a minimizer for (2) practice, and perform only a limited number of steps of an ˆ ˆ that we denote f = arg minf ( f ). iterative optimisation algorithm, to avoid overfitting the train- ∈H E The difference between risk and empirical risk is called ing set. They thereby entail less operations, while provably generalisation error and plays a central role in statistical maintaining the same generalisation error of approaches such learning theory. Indeed, when (1) admits a minimizer in , H as Tikhonov regularisation [21]. More specifically, prototyp- we have ical results (such as [21]) show that the number of iterations required are of the order of 1/λ where λ is the ideal regulari- ˆ ˆ ( f ) inf ( f ) 2 sup ( f ) ( f ) . (3) sation parameter that one would use for ERM. Therefore, if in E − f E ≤ f E −E ∈H ∈H the worst case scenario λ = O(1/ √n), early stopping would In other words, the excess risk incurred by the empirical risk attain (up to constants) the same generalisation error of regu- minimizer is controlled by the worse generalisation error over larised ERM by performing only √n iterations. A fundamentalresult in statistical learning theory [16–18], A different approach, also known as divide and conquer, is H often referred in the literature as the fundamental theorem of based on the idea of distributing portions of the training data statistical learning, is that for every n N, δ (0, 1), and ev- onto separate machines, each solving a smaller learning prob- ∈ ∈ ery distribution ρ, the following holds with probability larger lem, and then combining individualpredictors into a joint one. than 1 δ This computation hence benefits from both the parallelisation − and the reduced dimension of distributed datasets while simi- c ( ) + log(1/δ) sup ˆ( f ) ( f ) Θ H , (4) larly maintaining statistical guarantees [24]. r f E −E ≤ n A third approach that has recently received significant at- ∈H tention from the machine learning community, along with where c ( ) is a measure of the complexity of (such as the the quantum computing community, is based on random sub- VC dimension,H covering numbers, RademacherH complexity to sampling, a form of dimensionality reduction. Depending on name a few [16, 19]). Intuitively, the dependency on c( ) how such sampling is performed, different methods have been in (4) models the phenomenon known as overfitting in whichH proposed, the most well-known being random features [25] a large hypothesis space incurs in low training (empirical) er- and Nystr¨om approaches [26, 27]. Here the computational ad- ror but performs poorly on the true risk. This problem can vantage is clearly given by the smaller dimensionality of the be addressed with so-called regularisation techniques, which hypothesesspace, and it has also recently been shown that it is essentially limit the expressive power of the learned estimator possible to obtain equivalent generalisation error to classical in order to avoid overfitting the training dataset.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Predrnn: Recurrent Neural Networks for Predictive Learning Using Spatiotemporal Lstms
    PredRNN: Recurrent Neural Networks for Predictive Learning using Spatiotemporal LSTMs Yunbo Wang Mingsheng Long∗ School of Software School of Software Tsinghua University Tsinghua University [email protected] [email protected] Jianmin Wang Zhifeng Gao Philip S. Yu School of Software School of Software School of Software Tsinghua University Tsinghua University Tsinghua University [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Abstract The predictive learning of spatiotemporal sequences aims to generate future images by learning from the historical frames, where spatial appearances and temporal vari- ations are two crucial structures. This paper models these structures by presenting a predictive recurrent neural network (PredRNN). This architecture is enlightened by the idea that spatiotemporal predictive learning should memorize both spatial ap- pearances and temporal variations in a unified memory pool. Concretely, memory states are no longer constrained inside each LSTM unit. Instead, they are allowed to zigzag in two directions: across stacked RNN layers vertically and through all RNN states horizontally. The core of this network is a new Spatiotemporal LSTM (ST-LSTM) unit that extracts and memorizes spatial and temporal representations simultaneously. PredRNN achieves the state-of-the-art prediction performance on three video prediction datasets and is a more general framework, that can be easily extended to other predictive learning tasks by integrating with other architectures. 1 Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • Almost Unsupervised Text to Speech and Automatic Speech Recognition
    Almost Unsupervised Text to Speech and Automatic Speech Recognition Yi Ren * 1 Xu Tan * 2 Tao Qin 2 Sheng Zhao 3 Zhou Zhao 1 Tie-Yan Liu 2 Abstract 1. Introduction Text to speech (TTS) and automatic speech recognition (ASR) are two popular tasks in speech processing and have Text to speech (TTS) and automatic speech recog- attracted a lot of attention in recent years due to advances in nition (ASR) are two dual tasks in speech pro- deep learning. Nowadays, the state-of-the-art TTS and ASR cessing and both achieve impressive performance systems are mostly based on deep neural models and are all thanks to the recent advance in deep learning data-hungry, which brings challenges on many languages and large amount of aligned speech and text data. that are scarce of paired speech and text data. Therefore, However, the lack of aligned data poses a ma- a variety of techniques for low-resource and zero-resource jor practical problem for TTS and ASR on low- ASR and TTS have been proposed recently, including un- resource languages. In this paper, by leveraging supervised ASR (Yeh et al., 2019; Chen et al., 2018a; Liu the dual nature of the two tasks, we propose an et al., 2018; Chen et al., 2018b), low-resource ASR (Chuang- almost unsupervised learning method that only suwanich, 2016; Dalmia et al., 2018; Zhou et al., 2018), TTS leverages few hundreds of paired data and extra with minimal speaker data (Chen et al., 2019; Jia et al., 2018; unpaired data for TTS and ASR.
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Supervised Learning
    Self-Supervised Learning Andrew Zisserman Slides from: Carl Doersch, Ishan Misra, Andrew Owens, Carl Vondrick, Richard Zhang The ImageNet Challenge Story … 1000 categories • Training: 1000 images for each category • Testing: 100k images The ImageNet Challenge Story … strong supervision The ImageNet Challenge Story … outcomes Strong supervision: • Features from networks trained on ImageNet can be used for other visual tasks, e.g. detection, segmentation, action recognition, fine grained visual classification • To some extent, any visual task can be solved now by: 1. Construct a large-scale dataset labelled for that task 2. Specify a training loss and neural network architecture 3. Train the network and deploy • Are there alternatives to strong supervision for training? Self-Supervised learning …. Why Self-Supervision? 1. Expense of producing a new dataset for each new task 2. Some areas are supervision-starved, e.g. medical data, where it is hard to obtain annotation 3. Untapped/availability of vast numbers of unlabelled images/videos – Facebook: one billion images uploaded per day – 300 hours of video are uploaded to YouTube every minute 4. How infants may learn … Self-Supervised Learning The Scientist in the Crib: What Early Learning Tells Us About the Mind by Alison Gopnik, Andrew N. Meltzoff and Patricia K. Kuhl The Development of Embodied Cognition: Six Lessons from Babies by Linda Smith and Michael Gasser What is Self-Supervision? • A form of unsupervised learning where the data provides the supervision • In general, withhold some part of the data, and task the network with predicting it • The task defines a proxy loss, and the network is forced to learn what we really care about, e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Reinforcement Learning in Supervised Problem Domains
    Technische Universität München Fakultät für Informatik Lehrstuhl VI – Echtzeitsysteme und Robotik reinforcement learning in supervised problem domains Thomas F. Rückstieß Vollständiger Abdruck der von der Fakultät für Informatik der Technischen Universität München zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) genehmigten Dissertation. Vorsitzender: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Daniel Cremers Prüfer der Dissertation 1. Univ.-Prof. Dr. Patrick van der Smagt 2. Univ.-Prof. Dr. Hans Jürgen Schmidhuber Die Dissertation wurde am 30. 06. 2015 bei der Technischen Universität München eingereicht und durch die Fakultät für Informatik am 18. 09. 2015 angenommen. Thomas Rückstieß: Reinforcement Learning in Supervised Problem Domains © 2015 email: [email protected] ABSTRACT Despite continuous advances in computing technology, today’s brute for- ce data processing approaches may not provide the necessary advantage to win the race against the ever-growing amount of data that can be wit- nessed over the last decades. In this thesis, we discuss novel methods and algorithms that are capable of directing attention to relevant details and analysing it in sequence to overcome the processing bottleneck and to keep up with this data explosion. In the first of three parts, a novel exploration technique for Policy Gradi- ent Reinforcement Learning is presented which replaces traditional ad- ditive random exploration with state-dependent exploration, exploring on a higher, more strategic level. We will show how this new exploration method converges faster and finds better global solutions than random exploration can. The second part of this thesis will introduce the concept of “data con- sumption” and discuss means to minimise it in supervised learning tasks by deriving classification as a sequential decision process and ma- king it accessible to Reinforcement Learning methods.
    [Show full text]
  • Infinite Variational Autoencoder for Semi-Supervised Learning
    Infinite Variational Autoencoder for Semi-Supervised Learning M. Ehsan Abbasnejad Anthony Dick Anton van den Hengel The University of Adelaide {ehsan.abbasnejad, anthony.dick, anton.vandenhengel}@adelaide.edu.au Abstract with whatever labelled data is available to train a discrimi- native model for classification. This paper presents an infinite variational autoencoder We demonstrate that our infinite VAE outperforms both (VAE) whose capacity adapts to suit the input data. This the classical VAE and standard classification methods, par- is achieved using a mixture model where the mixing coef- ticularly when the number of available labelled samples is ficients are modeled by a Dirichlet process, allowing us to small. This is because the infinite VAE is able to more ac- integrate over the coefficients when performing inference. curately capture the distribution of the unlabelled data. It Critically, this then allows us to automatically vary the therefore provides a generative model that allows the dis- number of autoencoders in the mixture based on the data. criminative model, which is trained based on its output, to Experiments show the flexibility of our method, particularly be more effectively learnt using a small number of samples. for semi-supervised learning, where only a small number of The main contribution of this paper is twofold: (1) we training samples are available. provide a Bayesian non-parametric model for combining autoencoders, in particular variational autoencoders. This bridges the gap between non-parametric Bayesian meth- 1. Introduction ods and the deep neural networks; (2) we provide a semi- supervised learning approach that utilizes the infinite mix- The Variational Autoencoder (VAE) [18] is a newly in- ture of autoencoders learned by our model for prediction troduced tool for unsupervised learning of a distribution x x with from a small number of labeled examples.
    [Show full text]
  • Unsupervised Speech Representation Learning Using Wavenet Autoencoders Jan Chorowski, Ron J
    1 Unsupervised speech representation learning using WaveNet autoencoders Jan Chorowski, Ron J. Weiss, Samy Bengio, Aaron¨ van den Oord Abstract—We consider the task of unsupervised extraction speaker gender and identity, from phonetic content, properties of meaningful latent representations of speech by applying which are consistent with internal representations learned autoencoding neural networks to speech waveforms. The goal by speech recognizers [13], [14]. Such representations are is to learn a representation able to capture high level semantic content from the signal, e.g. phoneme identities, while being desired in several tasks, such as low resource automatic speech invariant to confounding low level details in the signal such as recognition (ASR), where only a small amount of labeled the underlying pitch contour or background noise. Since the training data is available. In such scenario, limited amounts learned representation is tuned to contain only phonetic content, of data may be sufficient to learn an acoustic model on the we resort to using a high capacity WaveNet decoder to infer representation discovered without supervision, but insufficient information discarded by the encoder from previous samples. Moreover, the behavior of autoencoder models depends on the to learn the acoustic model and a data representation in a fully kind of constraint that is applied to the latent representation. supervised manner [15], [16]. We compare three variants: a simple dimensionality reduction We focus on representations learned with autoencoders bottleneck, a Gaussian Variational Autoencoder (VAE), and a applied to raw waveforms and spectrogram features and discrete Vector Quantized VAE (VQ-VAE). We analyze the quality investigate the quality of learned representations on LibriSpeech of learned representations in terms of speaker independence, the ability to predict phonetic content, and the ability to accurately re- [17].
    [Show full text]
  • A Primer on Machine Learning
    A Primer on Machine Learning By instructor Amit Manghani Question: What is Machine Learning? Simply put, Machine Learning is a form of data analysis. Using algorithms that “ continuously learn from data, Machine Learning allows computers to recognize The core of hidden patterns without actually being programmed to do so. The key aspect of Machine Learning Machine Learning is that as models are exposed to new data sets, they adapt to produce reliable and consistent output. revolves around a computer system Question: consuming data What is driving the resurgence of Machine Learning? and learning from There are four interrelated phenomena that are behind the growing prominence the data. of Machine Learning: 1) the ever-increasing volume, variety and velocity of data, 2) the decrease in bandwidth and storage costs and 3) the exponential improve- ments in computational processing. In a nutshell, the ability to perform complex ” mathematical computations on big data is driving the resurgence in Machine Learning. 1 Question: What are some of the commonly used methods of Machine Learning? Reinforce- ment Machine Learning Supervised Machine Learning Semi- supervised Machine Unsupervised Learning Machine Learning Supervised Machine Learning In Supervised Learning, algorithms are trained using labeled examples i.e. the desired output for an input is known. For example, a piece of mail could be labeled either as relevant or junk. The algorithm receives a set of inputs along with the corresponding correct outputs to foster learning. Once the algorithm is trained on a set of labeled data; the algorithm is run against the same labeled data and its actual output is compared against the correct output to detect errors.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Perceptron Learning
    4 Perceptron Learning 4.1 Learning algorithms for neural networks In the two preceding chapters we discussed two closely related models, McCulloch–Pitts units and perceptrons, but the question of how to find the parameters adequate for a given task was left open. If two sets of points have to be separated linearly with a perceptron, adequate weights for the comput- ing unit must be found. The operators that we used in the preceding chapter, for example for edge detection, used hand customized weights. Now we would like to find those parameters automatically. The perceptron learning algorithm deals with this problem. A learning algorithm is an adaptive method by which a network of com- puting units self-organizes to implement the desired behavior. This is done in some learning algorithms by presenting some examples of the desired input- output mapping to the network. A correction step is executed iteratively until the network learns to produce the desired response. The learning algorithm is a closed loop of presentation of examples and of corrections to the network parameters, as shown in Figure 4.1. network test input-output compute the examples error fix network parameters Fig. 4.1. Learning process in a parametric system R. Rojas: Neural Networks, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1996 78 4 Perceptron Learning In some simple cases the weights for the computing units can be found through a sequential test of stochastically generated numerical combinations. However, such algorithms which look blindly for a solution do not qualify as “learning”. A learning algorithm must adapt the network parameters accord- ing to previous experience until a solution is found, if it exists.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Word Embeddings: Dense Representations for Multi-Modal Data
    The Thirty-Second International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference (FLAIRS-32) Beyond Word Embeddings: Dense Representations for Multi-Modal Data Luis Armona,1,2 José P. González-Brenes,2∗ Ralph Edezhath2∗ 1Department of Economics, Stanford University, 2Chegg, Inc. [email protected], {redezhath, jgonzalez}@chegg.com Abstract was required to extend a model like Word2Vec to support additional features. The authors of the seminal Doc2Vec (Le Methods that calculate dense vector representations for text have proven to be very successful for knowledge represen- and Mikolov 2014) paper needed to design both a new neural tation. We study how to estimate dense representations for network and a new sampling strategy to add a single feature multi-modal data (e.g., text, continuous, categorical). We (document ID). Feat2Vec is a general method that allows propose Feat2Vec as a novel model that supports super- calculating embeddings for any number of features. vised learning when explicit labels are available, and self- supervised learning when there are no labels. Feat2Vec calcu- 2 Feat2Vec lates embeddings for data with multiple feature types, enforc- In this section we describe how Feat2Vec learns embed- ing that all embeddings exist in a common space. We believe that we are the first to propose a method for learning self- dings of feature groups. supervised embeddings that leverage the structure of multiple feature types. Our experiments suggest that Feat2Vec outper- 2.1 Model forms previously published methods, and that it may be use- Feat2Vec predicts a target output y~ from each observation ful for avoiding the cold-start problem. ~x, which is multi-modal data that can be interpreted as a list of feature groups ~gi: 1 Introduction ~x = h~g1;~g2; : : : ;~gni = h~x~κ1 ; ~x~κ2 ; : : : ; ~x~κn i (1) Informally, in machine learning a dense representation, or For notational convenience, we also refer to the i-th feature n ~ r group as ~x .
    [Show full text]
  • Introducing Machine Learning for Healthcare Research
    INTRODUCING MACHINE LEARNING FOR HEALTHCARE RESEARCH Dr Stephen Weng NIHR Research Fellow (School for Primary Care Research) Primary Care Stratified Medicine (PRISM) Division of Primary Care School of Medicine University of Nottingham What is Machine Learning? Machine learning teaches computers to do what comes naturally to humans and animals: learn from experience. Machine learning algorithms use computation methods to “learn” information directly from data without relying on a predetermined equation to model. The algorithms adaptively improve their performance as the number of data samples available for learning increases. When Should We Use Considerations: Complex task or problem Machine Learning? Large amount of data Lots of variables No existing formula or equation Limited prior knowledge Hand-written rules and The nature of input and quantity Rules of the task are dynamic – equations are too complex – of data keeps changing – hospital financial transactions images, speech, linguistics admissions, health care records Supervised learning, which trains a model on known inputs and output data to predict future outputs How Machine Learning Unsupervised learning, which finds hidden patterns or Works intrinsic structures in the input data Semi-supervised learning, which uses a mixture of both techniques; some learning uses supervised data, some learning uses unsupervised learning Unsupervised Learning Group and interpret data Clustering based only on input data Machine Learning Classification Supervised learning Develop model based
    [Show full text]
  • Combining Supervised and Unsupervised Machine Learning
    Darktrace AI: Combining Unsupervised and Supervised Machine Learning Technical White Paper A New Age of Cyber-Threat Executive Summary A Changing Threat Landscape Darktrace is a research and development-led company that first applied The last decade has seen an unmistakable escalation in cyber conflict, as criminals, unsupervised machine learning to the challenge of detecting threatening nation states and lone opportunists take advantage of digitization and connectivity to digital activity within corporate networks, with the aim of combatting novel compromise networks and gain advantage – whether financial, reputational, or strategic. cyber attacks that bypass rule-based security tools. This white paper Our adversaries in cyber space are constantly innovating too, launching new attack examines the multiple layers of machine learning that make up Darktrace’s tools and technologies to get through traditional cyber security defenses, such as Cyber AI, and how they are architected together to create an autonomous, firewalls and signature-based gateways, and into the file shares or accounts that are system that self-updates, responding to, but not requiring, human input. most valuable to them. This system is today used by over 4,000 organizations globally. Attackers have also exploited to their advantage the digital complexity of the average organization of today, which shares data across multiple locations, devices and technology services– from cloud services and SaaS tools, to untrusted home networks and non-official IoT devices. Meanwhile, malicious insiders remain a constant threat. The new age of cyber security is defined by a constantly evolving threat landscape: no sooner have you identified the adversary, than it has shape-shifted into something unrecognizable.
    [Show full text]
  • Supervised Learning in Neural Networks
    Supervised Learning in Neural Networks April 11, 2010 1 Introduction Supervised Learning scenarios arise reasonably seldom in real life. They are situations in which an agent (e.g. human) performs many similar tasks, or many similar steps of a longer task, and receives frequent and detailed feedback: after each step, the agent learns a) whether or not her action was correct, and, in addition, b) the action that should have been performed. In real life, this type of feedback is not only rare, but annoying. Few people wish to have their every move corrected. In Machine Learning (ML), however, this learning paradigm has generated a lot of research interest for decades. The classic tasks involve classification, wherein the system is given a large data set, with each case consisting of many features plus a classification. For example, the features might be meteorological factors such as temperature, humidity, wind velocity, etc., while the class could be the predicted precipitation level (high, medium, low, or zero) for the next day. The supervised-learning classifier system must then learn to predict future precipitation when given a vector of meteorological features. The system receives the input features for a case and produces a precipitation prediction, whose accuracy can be assessed by a comparison to the known precipitation attached to that case. Any discrepancy between the two can then serve as an error term for modifying the system (so as to make better predictions in the future). Classification tasks are a staple of Machine Learning, and artificial neural networks are one of several standard tools (including decision-tree learning, case-based reasoning and Bayesian methods) used to tackle them.
    [Show full text]