DOCSLIB.ORG

Parliamentary Debates House of Commons Official Report General Committees

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Parliamentary Debates House of Commons Official Report General Committees PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT GENERAL COMMITTEES Public Bill Committee FISHERIES BILL [LORDS] First Sitting Tuesday 8 September 2020 (Morning) CONTENTS Programme motion agreed to. CLAUSE 1 agreed to, with an amendment. Adjourned till this day at Two o’clock. PBC (Bill 153) 2019 - 2021 No proofs can be supplied. Corrections that Members suggest for the final version of the report should be clearly marked in a copy of the report—not telephoned—and must be received in the Editor’s Room, House of Commons, not later than Saturday 12 September 2020 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2020 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 1 Public Bill Committee 8 SEPTEMBER 2020 Fisheries Bill [Lords] 2 The Committee consisted of the following Members: Chairs: †STEVE MCCABE,SIR CHARLES WALKER † Bonnar, Steven (Coatbridge, Chryston and Bellshill) † O’Hara, Brendan (Argyll and Bute) (SNP) (SNP) † Owatemi, Taiwo (Coventry North West) (Lab) † Bowie, Andrew (West Aberdeenshire and † Peacock, Stephanie (Barnsley East) (Lab) Kincardine) (Con) † Pollard, Luke (Plymouth, Sutton and Devonport) † Butler, Rob (Aylesbury) (Con) (Lab/Co-op) † Coutinho, Claire (East Surrey) (Con) † Prentis, Victoria (Parliamentary Under-Secretary of † Duffield, Rosie (Canterbury) (Lab) State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) † Smith, Cat (Lancaster and Fleetwood) (Lab) † Fletcher, Katherine (South Ribble) (Con) † Wild, James (North West Norfolk) (Con) † Goodwill, Mr Robert (Scarborough and Whitby) † Young, Jacob (Redcar) (Con) (Con) † Jones, Fay (Brecon and Radnorshire) (Con) Rob Page, Committee Clerk † Morris, James (Lord Commissioner of Her Majesty’s Treasury) † attended the Committee 3 Public Bill Committee HOUSE OF COMMONS Fisheries Bill [Lords] 4 The Chair: With this it will be convenient to discuss Public Bill Committee amendment 62, in clause 2, page 3, line 33, at end insert— Tuesday 8 September 2020 “(3A) The Secretary of State must annually lay a statement before Parliament on progress towards achieving the fisheries (Morning) objectives. (3B) The first such statement under subsection (3A) must be [STEVE MCCABE ] in the Chair laid before Parliament within 12 months of this section coming Fisheries Bill [Lords] into force.” This amendment would add a requirement on the Secretary of State to 9.25 am lay before Parliament an annual statement on progress towards achieving the fisheries objectives. The Chair: Good morning. I will make the usual preliminary points. We have been asked to be fairly strict about social distancing, so I ask you to bear that Luke Pollard: It is good to be back in the Fisheries in mind. If you find that you are bit constrained on one Bill Committee. A few of us in the room—the hardy side of the room, people are allowed to sit where there is few—are alumni of the last time that we had a sitting of space; it will not affect your vote or anything like that. I the Bill Committee, which was a good debate. We have a also ask you to switch your phones and electronic Committee that is made up of all political parties and is devices to silent. Mr Speaker does not permit tea, coffee focused on getting the best deal for our fishers, which is or other drinks to be consumed during the sitting. what the Opposition seek to do by proposing a number of amendments that look at how we strengthen our We shall start with the programme motion, which fishing sector, how we make it more sustainable, and was agreed at the Programming Sub-Committee yesterday. how we do so clearly. I know there has been a lot of Ordered, misdirection around positions on fishing in the past, That— especially after the Second Reading debate. However, I (1) the Committee shall (in addition to its first meeting at trust that there will not be any further misdirection by 9.25 am on Tuesday 8 September) meet— political parties’press offices, especially the ones responsible (a) at 2.00 pm on Tuesday 8 September; for the rather shameful adverts that we saw after Second (b) at 11.30 am and 2.00 pm on Thursday Reading. 10 September; (c) at 9.25 am and 2.00 pm on Tuesday 15 September; Labour supports the Bill. We support it because we (d) at 11.30 am and 2.00 pm on Thursday want our fishers to have a sustainable future. We want 17 September; to see a coastal renaissance that creates more jobs in (2) the proceedings shall be taken in the following order: fishing, lands more fish in British ports and enables us Clauses 1 to 11; Schedule 1; Clauses 12 and 13; to eat more local fish. It is in that spirit that we have Schedule 2; Clauses 14 to 19; Schedule 3; Clauses 20 tabled a number of amendments. Amendments 61 and to 23; Schedule 4; Clauses 24 to 29; Schedule 5; 62 stand in my name and that of the shadow Fisheries Clauses 30 to 35; Schedule 6; Clause 36; Schedule 7; Minister, my hon. Friend the Member for Barnsley Clauses 37 to 44; Schedule 8; Clauses 45 and 46; East. A lot has changed in the past two years, but I hope Schedule 9; Clause 47; Schedule 10; Clauses 48 to 54; new Clauses; new Schedules; remaining proceedings that we can make some real progress and get a good on the Bill; deal, because time to get a good deal for our fishers is (3) the proceedings shall (so far as not previously running out, with the hard deadline for our departure concluded) be brought to a conclusion at 5.00 pm on from the Brexit transition period the end of the year. Thursday 17 September.—(Victoria Prentis.) Clause 1 sets the tone for the entire Bill, highlighting the objectives—what they are, and how they will be put The Chair: We are off to a flyer. We now begin into practice—but it also sets the tone for the next line-by-line consideration of the Bill. The selection list 50 years of fishing in Britain. If we get this right, we for the sitting is available in the room; it shows how the have the opportunity to create more jobs and that selected amendments have been grouped together. coastal renaissance, but we will need amendments to Amendments on the same or a similar issue are generally the Bill to get there. That is the simple challenge that I grouped together, but please note that decisions on put to members of this Committee. How sustainable do amendments take place not in the order they are debated—I we want our industry to be—indeed, do we want it to be know this occasionally confuses all of us—but in the sustainable or not? Our amendments show clearly that order they appear on the amendment paper. The selection we want fishing to be more sustainable, because there is and grouping list shows the order of debate. Decisions no future for fishing if it is not sustainable. Sadly, that is on each amendment are taken when we come to the not implied by the Government amendments. clause that the amendment affects. The amendments in the House of Lords that made Clause 1 sustainability the prime consideration of fisheries management were a really important statement. It said FISHERIES OBJECTIVES that Britain will not be overfishing, that Britain values our fish stocks, and that we will support our industry so Luke Pollard (Plymouth, Sutton and Devonport) (Lab/ that it has a sustainable future. Those Lords amendments Co-op): I beg to move amendment 61, in clause 1, were a beacon of sustainability and good environmental page 1, line 11, at end insert— practice, and we should defend that in this Committee. “(1A) Any public authority with functions relating to fisheries activities or fisheries management must have regard to the I am pleased that the Government took the time to fisheries objectives in the exercise of those functions.” consider the amendments proposed by Labour the last This amendment would place a duty on public authorities to have regard time that this Bill was discussed—indeed, a large number to the fisheries objectives in exercising their fisheries functions. of those amendments have now been made and they 5 Public Bill Committee 8 SEPTEMBER 2020 Fisheries Bill [Lords] 6 will be defended by the Government. I am grateful to sectors that were most at risk. However, the annual the Minister and her officials for listening to our arguments, fisheries debate has become slightly less frequent, and it if not at the time then subsequently, and for accepting has moved around because of the frequency of fisheries those amendments. But when it comes to sustainability, Bills. Having an annual report laid before Parliament we need to recognise that more needs to be done. and therefore discussed by parliamentarians is the key Fishermen and women are some of the original stewards part of amendment 62 that would allow us to look at of our environment. Many of those I have spoken to in what progress has been achieved towards the objectives. Plymouth, which I represent, and in fishing ports across Amendment 61 states that people must have due regard the country know how important it is that fishing is in the exercise of public functions, and amendment 62 sustainable, that we protect our ecosystems. We must states that there must be decent scrutiny of the progress recognise the impact climate change is having on fish towards those objectives. Both are important starting stocks and reproduction rates, on the zones where certain points for the Bill.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fisheries Bill Explanatory Notes
    FISHERIES BILL EXPLANATORY NOTES What these notes do These Explanatory Notes relate to the Fisheries Bill as introduced in the House of Commons on 25 October 2018 (Bill 278). • These Explanatory Notes have been prepared by the Department for Environment, Farming and Rural Affairs in order to assist the reader of the Bill and to help inform debate on it. They do not form part of the Bill and have not been endorsed by Parliament. • These Explanatory Notes explain what each part of the Bill will mean in practice; provide background information on the development of policy; and provide additional information on how the Bill will affect existing legislation in this area. • These Explanatory Notes might best be read alongside the Bill. They are not, and are not intended to be, a comprehensive description of the Bill. Bill 278–EN 57/1 Table of Contents Subject Page of these Notes Overview of the Bill 4 Policy background 6 Exiting the EU 6 The Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) 6 Access 6 The management of fishing opportunities 7 Coastal State negotiations 7 December Fisheries Council 7 National quotas 7 Management regime 7 European Maritime Fisheries Fund 8 Fisheries management in the UK 8 Quota distribution 8 Producer Organisations 8 Fisheries Management in England 9 Devolution 9 Sustainable fisheries for future generations 9 Legal background 9 Legal background to the Common Fisheries Policy 9 London Fisheries Convention 10 UK law relating to fisheries 11 Legal background to the devolution of fisheries 12 International law: the United Nations Convention
    [Show full text]
  • Victoria Prentis MP Presents a Bill
    Victoria Prentis MP presents a bill "to make provision about mandatory local consultation in relation to changes in services proposed by NHS Trusts and healthcare commissioning authorities;and for connected purposes" 25 October 2016 Source: https://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2016-10- 25a.190.8&s=victoria+prentis#g191.2 On Tuesday 25 October, North Oxfordshire MP Victoria Prentis, presented her first Ten Minute Rule Motion to the House on the subject of the Horton General Hospital. The National Health Service Provision (Local Consultation) Bill was a direct response to events over the summer at the Horton General Hospital, which saw the downgrade of the maternity unit to a midwife-only service with no public consultation. During her speech, Victoria voiced her concerns about the way in which the decision was taken and emphasised the need for public consultation whenever there is a change to NHS services, even when it is in response to an emergency situation. Presenting her Bill to the Commons, Victoria said in the Chamber: I do find it encouraging to have paternal, maternal and, indeed, filial support in this place, Mr Speaker. I beg to move, That leave be given for to bring in a bill to make provision about mandatory local consultation in relation to changes in services proposed by NHS Trusts and healthcare commissioning authorities; and for connected purposes. The Bill is the result of our experience in Oxfordshire this summer when the Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust suspended consultant-led maternity services at our local general hospital with no warning and no consultation.
    [Show full text]
  • THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim
    THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents Theresa May - the Prime Minister
    Contents Theresa May - The Prime Minister .......................................................................................................... 5 Nancy Astor - The first female Member of Parliament to take her seat ................................................ 6 Anne Jenkin - Co-founder Women 2 Win ............................................................................................... 7 Margaret Thatcher – Britain’s first woman Prime Minister .................................................................... 8 Penny Mordaunt – First woman Minister of State for the Armed Forces at the Ministry of Defence ... 9 Lucy Baldwin - Midwifery and safer birth campaigner ......................................................................... 10 Hazel Byford – Conservative Women’s Organisation Chairman 1990 - 1993....................................... 11 Emmeline Pankhurst – Leader of the British Suffragette Movement .................................................. 12 Andrea Leadsom – Leader of House of Commons ................................................................................ 13 Florence Horsbrugh - First woman to move the Address in reply to the King's Speech ...................... 14 Helen Whately – Deputy Chairman of the Conservative Party ............................................................. 15 Gillian Shephard – Chairman of the Association of Conservative Peers ............................................... 16 Dorothy Brant – Suffragette who brought women into Conservative Associations ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • Members of the House of Commons December 2019 Diane ABBOTT MP
    Members of the House of Commons December 2019 A Labour Conservative Diane ABBOTT MP Adam AFRIYIE MP Hackney North and Stoke Windsor Newington Labour Conservative Debbie ABRAHAMS MP Imran AHMAD-KHAN Oldham East and MP Saddleworth Wakefield Conservative Conservative Nigel ADAMS MP Nickie AIKEN MP Selby and Ainsty Cities of London and Westminster Conservative Conservative Bim AFOLAMI MP Peter ALDOUS MP Hitchin and Harpenden Waveney A Labour Labour Rushanara ALI MP Mike AMESBURY MP Bethnal Green and Bow Weaver Vale Labour Conservative Tahir ALI MP Sir David AMESS MP Birmingham, Hall Green Southend West Conservative Labour Lucy ALLAN MP Fleur ANDERSON MP Telford Putney Labour Conservative Dr Rosena ALLIN-KHAN Lee ANDERSON MP MP Ashfield Tooting Members of the House of Commons December 2019 A Conservative Conservative Stuart ANDERSON MP Edward ARGAR MP Wolverhampton South Charnwood West Conservative Labour Stuart ANDREW MP Jonathan ASHWORTH Pudsey MP Leicester South Conservative Conservative Caroline ANSELL MP Sarah ATHERTON MP Eastbourne Wrexham Labour Conservative Tonia ANTONIAZZI MP Victoria ATKINS MP Gower Louth and Horncastle B Conservative Conservative Gareth BACON MP Siobhan BAILLIE MP Orpington Stroud Conservative Conservative Richard BACON MP Duncan BAKER MP South Norfolk North Norfolk Conservative Conservative Kemi BADENOCH MP Steve BAKER MP Saffron Walden Wycombe Conservative Conservative Shaun BAILEY MP Harriett BALDWIN MP West Bromwich West West Worcestershire Members of the House of Commons December 2019 B Conservative Conservative
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the Exploitation of the Mussel, Mytilus Edulis, in Scotland
    Review of the Exploitation of the Mussel, Myti/us edulis, in Scotland David W McKay and Sarah L Fowler No68 Review of the Exploitation of the Mussel, Mytilus edulis, in Scotland David W McKay and Sarah L Fowler 1997 The Nature Conservation Bureau Ltd 36 Kingfisher Court, Hambridge Road, Newbury, Berkshire RG14 5SJ Nominated Officer: K Duncan, Aquatic Environment Branch Report date: 1996 Report to: Scottish Natural Heritage Contract No: RASD/026/195 AEB This report should be cited as follows: McKay, D.W. and Fowler, S.L. 1997. Review of the Exploitation of the Mussel, Myti/us edulis, in Scotland. Scottish Natural Heritage Revjew. No 68 Scottish Natural Heritage Scottish Natural Heritage Publications Section Research and Advisory Services Directorate Battleby, Redgorton, Perth PH1 3EW 2 Anderson Place, Edinburgh EH6 5NP UNITED KINGDOM UNITED KINGDOM ISSN 1350-3111 Review ofthe Exploitation ofthe Mussel, Mvtilus edulis in Scotland Contents 1. Summary ............................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 2 3. Methods ................................................................................................................................................ 3 3 .1. Questionnaire survey ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fisheries Bill [Hl] Explanatory Notes
    FISHERIES BILL [HL] EXPLANATORY NOTES What these notes do These Explanatory Notes relate to the Fisheries Bill [HL] as introduced in the House of Lords on 29 January 2020 (HL Bill 71). • These Explanatory Notes have been prepared by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs in order to assist the reader of the Bill and to help inform debate on it. They do not form part of the Bill and have not been endorsed by Parliament. • These Explanatory Notes explain what each part of the Bill will mean in practice; provide background information on the development of policy; and provide additional information on how the Bill will affect existing legislation in this area. • These Explanatory Notes might best be read alongside the Bill. They are not, and are not intended to be, a comprehensive description of the Bill. HL Bill 71–EN 58/1 Table of Contents Subject Page of these Notes Overview of the Bill 4 Policy background 6 Exiting the EU 6 The Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) 6 Access 6 The management of fishing opportunities 6 Coastal State negotiations 7 December Fisheries Council 7 National quotas 7 Management regime 7 European Maritime and Fisheries Fund 8 Fisheries management in the UK 8 Quota distribution 8 Producer Organisations 8 Fisheries Management in England 8 Devolution 9 Sustainable fisheries for future generations 9 Legal background 9 Legal background to the Common Fisheries Policy 9 London Fisheries Convention 10 UK law relating to fisheries 11 Legal background to the devolution of fisheries 12 International law: the United
    [Show full text]
  • Fourteenth Report: Draft Statute Law Repeals Bill
    The Law Commission and The Scottish Law Commission (LAW COM. No. 211) (SCOT. LAW COM. No. 140) STATUTE LAW REVISION: FOURTEENTH REPORT DRAFT STATUTE LAW (REPEALS) BILL Presented to Parliament by the Lord High Chancellor and the Lord Advocate by Command of Her Majesty April 1993 LONDON: HMSO E17.85 net Cm 2176 The Law Commission and the Scottish Law Commission were set up by the Law Commissions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the Law. The Law Commissioners are- The Honourable Mr. Justice Brooke, Chairman Mr Trevor M. Aldridge, Q.C. Mr Jack Beatson Mr Richard Buxton, Q.C. Professor Brenda Hoggett, Q.C. The Secretary of the Law Commission is Mr Michael Collon. Its offices are at Conquest House, 37-38 John Street, Theobalds Road, London WClN 2BQ. The Scottish Law Commissioners are- The Honourable Lord Davidson, Chairman .. Dr E.M. Clive Professor P.N. Love, C.B.E. Sheriff I.D.Macphail, Q.C. Mr W.A. Nimmo Smith, Q.C. The Secretary of the Scottish Law Commission is Mr K.F. Barclay. Its offices are at 140 Causewayside, Edinburgh EH9 1PR. .. 11 THE LAW COMMISSION AND THE SCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION STATUTE LAW REVISION: FOURTEENTH REPORT Draft Statute Law (Repeals) Bill To the Right Honourable the Lord Mackay of Clashfern, Lord High Chancellor of Great Britain, and the Right Honourable the Lord Rodger of Earlsferry, Q.C., Her Majesty's Advocate. In pursuance of section 3(l)(d) of the Law Commissions Act 1965, we have prepared the draft Bill which is Appendix 1 and recommend that effect be given to the proposals contained in it.
    [Show full text]
  • Whole Day Download the Hansard
    Monday Volume 642 4 June 2018 No. 146 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Monday 4 June 2018 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2018 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. HER MAJESTY’S GOVERNMENT MEMBERS OF THE CABINET (FORMED BY THE RT HON. THERESA MAY, MP, JUNE 2017) PRIME MINISTER,FIRST LORD OF THE TREASURY AND MINISTER FOR THE CIVIL SERVICE—The Rt Hon. Theresa May, MP CHANCELLOR OF THE DUCHY OF LANCASTER AND MINISTER FOR THE CABINET OFFICE – The Rt Hon. David Lidington, MP CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER—The Rt Hon. Philip Hammond, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT—The Rt Hon. Sajid Javid, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR FOREIGN AND COMMONWEALTH AFFAIRS—The Rt Hon. Boris Johnson, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR EXITING THE EUROPEAN UNION—The Rt Hon. David Davis, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR DEFENCE—The Rt Hon. Gavin Williamson, MP LORD CHANCELLOR AND SECRETARY OF STATE FOR JUSTICE—The Rt Hon. David Gauke, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE—The Rt Hon. Jeremy Hunt, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR BUSINESS,ENERGY AND INDUSTRIAL STRATEGY—The Rt Hon. Greg Clark, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR HOUSING,COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT—The Rt Hon. James Brokenshire, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR INTERNATIONAL TRADE AND PRESIDENT OF THE BOARD OF TRADE—The Rt Hon. Liam Fox, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR EDUCATION—The Rt Hon. Damian Hinds, MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT,FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRS—The Rt Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Statutory Instrument Practice
    Statutory Instrument Practice A guide to help you prepare and publish Statutory Instruments and understand the Parliamentary procedures relating to them - 5th edition (November 2017) Statutory Instrument Practice Page i Statutory Instrument Practice is published by The National Archives © Crown copyright 2017 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to: [email protected]. Statutory Instrument Practice Page ii Preface This is the fifth edition of Statutory Instrument Practice (SIP) and replaces the edition published in November 2006. This edition has been prepared by the Legislation Services team at The National Archives. We will contact you regularly to make sure that this guide continues to meet your needs, and remains accurate. If you would like to suggest additional changes to us, please email them to the SI Registrar. Thank you to all of the contributors who helped us to update this edition. You can download SIP from: https://publishing.legislation.gov.uk/tools/uksi/si-drafting/si- practice. November 2017 Statutory Instrument Practice Page iii Contents PREFACE ............................................................................................................................. 3 CONTENTS .......................................................................................................................... 4 PART 1: INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Provide That the Fishery Limits Act 1976
    Fishery Limits (United Kingdom) Amendment Bill 1 A BILL TO Provide that the Fishery Limits Act 1976 shall have effect regardless of the provisions of the European Communities Act 1972; that Part II of the Merchant Shipping Act 1988 shall have effect as though it had not been repealed by the Merchant Shipping (Registration etc) Act 1993; to confer upon the Secretary of State powers to license fishing vessels to fish within United Kingdom waters; to exclude vessels of specified nations or specified vessels from fishing United Kingdom waters; to negotiate common policies with other countries to preserve fish stocks; to invalidate any provisions of the Common Fisheries Policy of the European Community; and for connected purposes. E IT ENACTED by the Queen’s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present BParliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:— 1 Effect on Common Fisheries Policy (1) At the date on which this Act comes into force (the “commencement date”) the United Kingdom shall withdraw from the Common Fisheries Policy of the European Union. (2) The Fishery Limits Act 1976 (c. 86) shall have effect from the commencement 5 date regardless of any provision of community law to the contrary and notwithstanding the provisions of the European Communities Act 1972 (c. 68). 2 Amendment of the Fishery Limits Act 1976 (1) The Fishery Limits Act 1976 is amended as follows. (2) In section 2 (access to British fisheries), for subsection (2) there is substituted— 10 “(2) A foreign fishing boat not registered in a country for the time being designated under subsection (1) shall not enter British fishery limits.
    [Show full text]
  • Whole Day Download the Hansard
    Tuesday Volume 687 19 January 2021 No. 162 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Tuesday 19 January 2021 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2021 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 753 19 JANUARY 2021 754 Chris Law (Dundee West) (SNP) [V]: Global poverty House of Commons has risen for the first time in more than 20 years, and by the end of this year, it is estimated that there will be Tuesday 19 January 2021 more than 150 million people in extreme poverty.Against that backdrop, the UK Government recklessly abolished the Department for International Development, they The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock are reneging on their 0.7% of GNI commitment, and they do not even mention eradicating poverty in the seven global challenges that UK aid is to be focused on. PRAYERS Can the Minister explicitly commit to eradicating poverty within the new official development assistance framework, rather than pursuing inhumane and devastating cuts as [MR SPEAKER ] in the Chair part of the Prime Minister’s little Britain vanity project? Virtual participation in proceedings continued (Order, 4 June and 30 December 2020). James Duddridge: The hon. Gentleman knows that [NB: [V] denotes a Member participating virtually.] we share a passion for international development. These specific targets do aim to alleviate and eradicate poverty, but the causes of poverty and the solutions to it are complex. That is why the merger of the Departments Oral Answers to Questions works, dealing with development and diplomacy alongside one another to overcome the scourge of poverty, which, sadly, has increased not decreased as a result of covid.
    [Show full text]