Comparative Connections

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Comparative Connections P a c i f i c F o r u m C S I S Comparative Connections A Quarterly E-Journal on East Asian Bilateral Relations edited by Brad Glosserman Eun Jung Cahill Che 2nd Quarter 2002 Vol. 4, No. 2 July 2002 www.csis.org/pacfor/ccejournal.html Pacific Forum CSIS Based in Honolulu, Hawaii, the Pacific Forum CSIS operates as the autonomous Asia- Pacific arm of the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, D.C. Founded in 1975, the thrust of the Forum’s work is to help develop cooperative policies in the Asia- Pacific region through debate and analyses undertaken with the region’s leaders in the academic, government, and corporate arenas. The Forum’s programs encompass current and emerging political, security, economic/business, and oceans policy issues. It collaborates with a network of more than 30 research institutes around the Pacific Rim, drawing on Asian perspectives and disseminating its projects’ findings and recommendations to opinion leaders, governments, and publics throughout the region. An international Board of Governors guides the Pacific Forum’s work; it is chaired by Brent Scowcroft, former Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs. The Forum is funded by grants from foundations, corporations, individuals, and governments, the latter providing a small percentage of the forum’s $1.2 million annual budget. The Forum’s studies are objective and nonpartisan and it does not engage in classified or proprietary work. Comparative Connections A Quarterly E-Journal on East Asian Bilateral Relations Edited by Brad Glosserman and Eun Jung Cahill Che Volume 4, Number 2 Second Quarter 2002 Honolulu, Hawaii July 2002 Comparative Connections A Quarterly Electronic Journal on East Asian Bilateral Relations Bilateral relationships in East Asia have long been important to regional peace and stability, but in the post-Cold War environment, these relationships have taken on a new strategic rationale as countries pursue multiple ties, beyond those with the U.S., to realize complex political, economic, and security interests. How one set of bilateral interests affects a country’s other key relations is becoming more fluid and complex, and at the same time is becoming more central to the region’s overall strategic compass. Comparative Connections, Pacific Forum’s quarterly electronic journal on East Asian bilateral relations edited by Brad Glosserman and Eun Jung Cahill Che, with Ralph A. Cossa serving as senior editor, was created in response to this unique environment. Comparative Connections provides timely and insightful analyses on key bilateral relationships in the region, including those involving the U.S. We cover 12 key bilateral relationships that are critical for the region. While we recognize the importance of other states in the region, our intention is to keep the core of the e-journal to a manageable and readable length. Because our project cannot give full attention to each of the relationships in Asia, coverage of U.S.-Southeast Asia and China-Southeast Asia countries consists of a summary of individual bilateral relationships, and may shift focus from country to country as events warrant. Other bilateral relationships may be tracked periodically (such as various bilateral relationships with India or Australia’s significant relationships) as events dictate. Our aim is to inform and interpret the significant issues driving political, economic, and security affairs of the U.S. and East Asian relations by an ongoing analysis of events in each key bilateral relationship. The reports, written by a variety of experts in Asian affairs, focus on political/security developments, but economic issues are also addressed. Each essay is accompanied by a chronology of significant events occurring between the states in question during the quarter. An overview section, written by Pacific Forum, places bilateral relationships in a broader context of regional relations. By providing value-added interpretative analyses, as well as factual accounts of key events, the e-journal illuminates patterns in Asian bilateral relations that may appear as isolated events and better defines the impact bilateral relationships have upon one another and on regional security. Table of Contents Regional Overview:………………………………………………………………………1 Powell Speaks ... Was Anyone Listening? by Ralph A. Cossa, Pacific Forum CSIS In June, Secretary of State Colin Powell presented the most comprehensive statement to date on U.S. Asia policy, underscoring the importance of America’s regional alliances while reinforcing the administration’s focus on antiterrorism. It set a positive tone regarding Sino-U.S. relations. The same cannot be said about North Korea. While expressing hope that a U.S.-DPRK dialogue would soon begin, Powell also laid out specific prerequisites for progress that will guarantee arduous negotiations if and when the two sides ever actually sit down and talk. Overshadowing Powell’s speech was President Bush’s June 1 West Point address, which signaled a more proactive (if not pre- emptive) strategy in the war on terrorism. Meanwhile, multilateralism took on new energy in Asia, highlighted by a de facto defense “summit” and a genuine summit on confidence building involving numerous Asian heads of state (but not the U.S.). Also capturing the international spotlight was the release of Nobel Laureate Aung San Suu Kyi from house arrest. U.S.-Japan Relations:…………………………………………………………………..17 All is Good, If You Don’t Look Too Close by Brad Glosserman, Pacific Forum CSIS It has been a relatively quiet quarter for United States-Japan relations. Political, economic, and security relations have continued on a positive course. Yet if the trajectory is good, there has been a big change in a critical element of the U.S.-Japan relationship: the popularity of Japanese Prime Minister Koizumi Junichiro has suffered a precipitous drop. Since public support was the prime minister’s only card in his battles with the old guard of his Liberal Democratic Party, the plunge in public approval ratings threatens to undermine his entire legislative program. Koizumi’s weakness will also be felt in relations with the U.S. The failure to pursue aggressive economic reform could damage his credibility. The prime minister has already been forced to give up on legislation that would allow the Japanese government to respond to crises – a indicator of Japan’s “new” seriousness in security affairs. U.S.-China Relations:…………………………………………………………………..25 Fleshing out the Candid, Cooperative, and Constructive Relationship by Bonnie S. Glaser, Consultant on Asian Affairs An active agenda of exchanges and consultations took place this quarter, providing Sino- U.S. relations with a modicum of stability. Chinese Vice President Hu Jintao toured the U.S., stopping in Washington for two days of meetings with President George W. Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney, and many Cabinet members. Cooperation between Washington and Beijing in the war on terrorism advanced with the establishment of semi- annual consultations on sources of terrorist financing. Broader discussions were also held in the second round U.S.-China counterterrorism talks. Talks also provided a boost to commercial and economic ties. Beijing remained both suspicious and perplexed by U.S. policy toward Taiwan, and verbal gaffes by President Bush and Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz created unease on both sides of the Strait. Finally, the U.S. and Chinese militaries explored the possibility of resuming contacts. U.S.-Korea Relations:…………………………………………………………………..35 After the “Breakthrough,” Now What? by Donald G. Gross, Yonsei University Graduate School of International Relations This quarter opened with a bang and ended with a long pause. South Korea’s Special Presidential Envoy Lim Dong-won undertook a critical mission to North Korea to put the process of inter-Korean reconciliation back on track. North Korea’s willingness to meet with Lim signaled a desire to improve the political atmosphere after more than a year of verbal sparring with the Bush administration. Pyongyang agreed to resume bilateral negotiations with Washington, decided to continue reunions of divided Korean families, organize a new round of South-North economic talks, and continue discussions with South Korea on military confidence building. What most influenced North Korea’s decision will probably never be known precisely. Most likely, fear of Washington’s new aggressiveness in confronting potential enemies post-Sept. 11 was a significant factor. U.S.-Russia Relations:………………………………………………………………….44 Growing Expectations: How Far Can Rapprochement be Carried Forward? by Joseph Ferguson, The Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies Presidents Bush and Putin carried out successful summits in Moscow and St. Petersburg in May and signed a groundbreaking strategic arms reduction agreement. Russia was welcomed into NATO and given a seat on a council with a voice in alliance matters. The U.S. also was behind the pledge by the G-7 nations to contribute $20 billion over 10 years to nonproliferation programs in Russia and the former Soviet republics and to give Russia a permanent seat at future G-8 meetings. Most important, the U.S. and Russia have continued their cooperation in the war on terrorism and Russia continues to give the U.S. a free hand in Central Asia. In return the U.S. leadership remains mum on Chechnya. Nevertheless, more is expected in Russia in return for unquestioned support of the U.S. Putin is beginning to feel some domestic opposition to his policy of “appeasing” the U.S.; how long he can continue this policy if Russia appears to accrue no advantage is questionable. U.S.-Southeast Asia Relations:……………………………………………………….. 50 Building for the Long Term by Marvin Ott, National Defense University The quarter was marked by continued U.S. efforts to consolidate and clarify its counterterrorism strategy in the region. In the Philippines, U.S. military training and assistance seemed to produce more energetic and effective operations by the Philippine Army against Abu Sayyaf guerrillas.
Recommended publications
  • Global Sports – Opportunities for UK Companies South Korea
    Opportunity Korea Global Sports – Opportunities for UK companies South Korea South Korea In the next four years Korea will see an unprecedented level of activity at the host the Asian Games in Incheon, the Universiade in Gwangju, the IOC Winter Olympics in Pyeongchang and the FISU World Swimming Championships in Gwangju. Korea is no stranger to hosting global sports events, and it has hosted (amongst others): 1986 - Asian Games in Seoul 1988 - IOC Summer Olympics in Seoul 2002 - FIFA Football World Cup 2002 - Asian Games in Busan 2011 - IAAF World Athletics Championship in Daegu Incheon Asian Games – Sept 2014 changes at the top of the committee. Gwangju Universiade – July 2015 The Asian Games are larger in scale South-Western city Gwangju will host than the Summer Olympics, While the Incheon Committee was the summer Universiade (World consisting of 36 sports, around 13,000 impressed by the UK’s staging of the Student Games) in July 2015. The athletes and officials and 7,000 London Olympics in 2012, much of games will feature 21 sports and host broadcasters. The organising UK’s good work will have come a little 7,000 athletes from 170 countries. committee of the Incheon Games has too late to influence the Incheon stated it will use a mixture of existing committee who have been driven by Four new venues (including the and new venues. The main stadium low cost options. British companies swimming complex which will be used has been designed by UK company have delivered some technical for the FISU World Swimming Populous (the designers of the solutions, may be involved in the Championships in 2019) will be built, stadium at Stratford).
    [Show full text]
  • Of the ROK with a Summary of the January 8-9 1986 Meeting Between the Two Korean NOCS
    Digital Archive digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org International History Declassified January 15, 1986 Letter from the International Olympic Committee President to the National Olympic Committee (NOC) of the ROK with a Summary of the January 8-9 1986 Meeting between the Two Korean NOCS Citation: “Letter from the International Olympic Committee President to the National Olympic Committee (NOC) of the ROK with a Summary of the January 8-9 1986 Meeting between the Two Korean NOCS,” January 15, 1986, History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive, International Olympic Committee Archives (Switzerland), SEOUL’ 88/ 2EME REUNION DES 2COREES 1985-86. Obtained for NKIDP by Sergey Radchenko. http://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/113482 Summary: A letter from IOC President Samaranch to the North Korean Olympic Committee, which included a summary of a recent meeting between the Olympic Committees of North and South Korea, at which some of the issues discussed were events that could be held in North Korea, the torch relay, and future meetings. Original Language: English Contents: English Transcription Mr. Chong Ha KIM President Korean Olympic Committee C.P.O Box 1106 CONFIDENTIAL SEOUL / Korea Lausanne, 15th January 1986 Ref. No. /86/afb Re: Second meeting between the NOC of the Republic of Korea and the NOC of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea. Dear Mr. Kim, Further to the meeting held in Lausanne on 8th and 9th January 1986 between the NOCs of the Republic of Korea and of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, under the auspices of the International Olympic Committee, please find enclosed a resumé of the following discussions in which your delegation took part: - discussions between the IOC and the delegations from the NOCs of the Republic of Korea and the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea; - discussions between the IOC and your delegation alone.
    [Show full text]
  • Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani Dan Olahraga
    JPJO 5 (2) (2020) 218-232 Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani dan Olahraga Available online at: https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/penjas/article/view/27256 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jpjo.v5i2.27256 Indonesian Women’s Rowing from 1986 to 2018: A historical, Social and Cultural Perspective Dede Rohmat Nurjaya*, Amung Ma’mun, Agus Rusdiana Prodi Pendidikan Olahraga, Sekolah Pasca Sarjana, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia Article Info Abstract Article History : In 1954, the International Federation of Societes d'Aviron (FISA) organized the first Received June 2020 European women's rowing championship in Macon, France. Female rowing athletes Revised June 2020 around the world had actively participated for years, competing not only in local and national competitions, but also in international level. Apart from the historical evi- Accepted August 2020 dence that women could indeed compete at the international level, the FISA delegation Available online September 2020 found it more appropriate to limit women's international participation by shortening the distance of women's competitions to half of male athletes and limiting the number Keywords : and the type of race. Although women's international athletes were limited, the intro- Indonesia; Women Rowing; 1987-2018 duction of women's races at European championships created opportunities for female Era athletes to show their abilities to the public while challenging social and historical dis- course about Indonesian women's participation in rowing. Eversince this first race, female athletes and coaches had a desire to achieve gender equality in sports that are usually associated with men and masculinity. In 2003, their efforts culminated with the acceptance of women at European Championships, World Championships, and the Olympics, the change in the distance of women's rowing from 1,000 meters to 2,000 meters, and the introduction of women's lightweight class at World Championships and the Olympics.
    [Show full text]
  • 57 Maple Road
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Greenwich Academic Literature Archive The Legacy of the 1988 Seoul Olympic Games Dr. Hyunsun Yoon Book chapter 2009: “The Legacy of the 1988 Seoul Olympic Games” in Olympic Cities – 2012 and the Remaking of London, Poynter, G. and MacRury. I. (eds) Farnham: Ashgate, Routledge. Background Seoul was awarded the 1988 Olympic Games on 29th September 1981 in Baden-Baden. The Olympic Movement was going through ‘a very worrying time’, recalls Juan Antonio Samaranch, the then President of the International Olympic Committee (IOC); “The terrorist attack that traumatized the 1972 Games in Munich had demoralized several cities that were nurturing hopes of hosting the Olympic Games. Montreal’s financial problems in 1976 exacerbated this recession. As a result in 1978 only one city, Los Angeles, bid for the 1984 Games. The 1980 boycott of the Moscow Games was a further setback.” (Samaranch in Park, 1994: 406) Only two oriental cities, Nagoya (Japan) and Seoul were bidding for the Games and Seoul was chosen. Held in a politically divided nation, the 1988 Games have the significance in that it was where athletes of the whole world met together for the first time since the 1976 Montreal Olympics. A total of 160 countries participated in the 1988 Games and the Games clearly had an impact on the Olympic Movement in that it ended the era of boycotts, despite the absence of seven countries. The Olympic Movement, in return, has also affected the domestic political context of South Korea.
    [Show full text]
  • The World Cup, Sports Diplomacy, and Japan-Korea Relations
    Japan-Korea Relations: The World Cup and Sports Diplomacy by Victor D. Cha Director, Project on American Alliances in Asia School of Foreign Service, Georgetown University The story of the quarter was Japan’s re-engagement with the two Koreas on several levels. For Seoul-Tokyo relations, the World Cup soccer matches overshadowed important, but quiet, efforts at resuming bilateral security dialogue. For Tokyo- Pyongyang relations, baby steps toward resuming long-suspended normalization talks appear to have been made. Finally, the impact of the World Cup and sports diplomacy on Japan-South Korea relations is not to be underestimated. Though the 2002 Cup did not mark modernity for either already-modern country, the Cup’s success was in no small part a function of the fact that it was hosted by two of the more advanced, market-savvy, globalized, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, open-society countries in Asia. This not only gave the games a luster not easily tarnished, but it also is a lasting image for Japan-South Korea cooperation. Not bad for a null outcome. Japan-ROK Relations: Re-engagement, Part I In case you’ve been vacationing on the moon (or in North Korea), the big story in Seoul- Tokyo relations this past quarter was the World Cup. The overall impact of Seoul and Tokyo’s co-hosting of the event is discussed at length below. What deserves mention here as a tangible positive externality of the matches was the signing of an extradition treaty between the two countries. Long overdue, but directly a function of the increased travel anticipated for the matches, the treaty requires both countries to extradite any nationals involved in serious criminal activity (i.e., carrying a prison sentence of more than one year).
    [Show full text]
  • Pyeongchang V Pyongyang: the Endless Game of Inter-Korean Sports
    The University of San Francisco USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center Master's Projects and Capstones Theses, Dissertations, Capstones and Projects Spring 5-15-2020 Pyeongchang v Pyongyang: The Endless Game of Inter-Korean Sports Jack Anderson [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.usfca.edu/capstone Part of the Asian History Commons, Korean Studies Commons, and the Political History Commons Recommended Citation Anderson, Jack, "Pyeongchang v Pyongyang: The Endless Game of Inter-Korean Sports" (2020). Master's Projects and Capstones. 1014. https://repository.usfca.edu/capstone/1014 This Project/Capstone is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, Capstones and Projects at USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Projects and Capstones by an authorized administrator of USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Pyeongchang v Pyongyang: The Endless Game of Inter-Korean Sports Jack Anderson APS 650, Capstone Project Professor Dempster May 19, 2020 1 Abstract Since their division, North and South Korea have fluctuated between a peaceful and chaotic relationship. This project explores the role of athletics within inter-Korean relations, using a multidimensional conceptual framework. In particular, this research examines the significant role sports play within each country’s political affairs, how this phenomenon has evolved, and the impact of sports on how South Koreans view their neighbors and the idea of reunification. Through in-depth historical and quantitative analysis, we see that sports can be understood as a political tool that has matured over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Mega-Sporting Events in Asia — Impacts on Society, Business And
    Asian Business & Management, 2008, 7, (147–162) r 2008 Palgrave Macmillan Ltd 1472-4782/08 $30.00 www.palgrave-journals.com/abm Mega-Sporting Events in Asia — Impacts on Society, Business and Management: An Introduction Harald Dollesa and Sten So¨ dermanb aSchool of Management, heilbronn business school, Bahnhofstrae 1, Heilbronn 74072, Germany. E-mail: [email protected] bSchool of Business, Stockholm University, Stockholm SE 106 91, Sweden. E-mail: [email protected] Mega-sporting events today are central stages that not only feature professional athletes representing their country in competing for excellence, but also provide host nations with a universally legitimate way to present and promote their national identities and cultures on a global scale.This introduction to the special issue of Asian Business & Management on ‘Mega-sporting events in Asia’ suggests insights into the emerging field of research related to mega-events and sport and summarizes the history of mega-sporting events in Asia, linking the topic to the growing importance of sports and the interest shown by national governments and cities in staging sporting events in Asia.It also offers a general framework for understanding a range of conceptual and methodological issues related to defining and measuring the impact of mega-sporting events, indicating potential directions for further research. Asian Business & Management (2008) 7, 147–162. doi:10.1057/abm.2008.7 Keywords: olympic games; FIFA world cup; mega-sporting events; impact analysis; Asia Mega-Sporting Events in Asia
    [Show full text]
  • JET 20 Whole File (F
    GUEST EDITOR’S INTRODUCTION Huimin Jin It is widely received, if it is not running the risk of becoming a cliché as David Held et al. suspect (Held, 1999: 1), that globalization is not only what we are nowadays but also a theory or perspective with which to look at and deal with such a what-we-are-nowadays. However, to the questions of what globalization is by definition, and what we are experiencing from it, and therefore what theory or perspective it may be, none of the answers is cogent and convincing to date, they are but one argument after/against another. There are two existing approaches to globalization: the modernity and postmodernity. The former holds that globalization is an extension or a diffusion of the modern Western universal values and systems to the East. As suggested by Marxist critics such as Wallerstein, Harvey or Amin, globalization is no more than a global expansion of (Western) capitalism, a flow of (Western) capital and ideology without boundaries. The latter argues that globalization does not signify a triumph of modernity across the world but quite the opposite. A failure of this modernity project, when it meets other cultures or civilizations as perceived by Huntington, Giddens, and the like, and at its best, in the terminology of Roland Robertson (Robertson, 1992: 173-174), it finally becomes a “glocalization.” The theory of Global dialogism is neither the model of modernity nor that of postmodernity, but rather an alternative, which tries to integrate and therefore transcend the previous two approaches. Globalization is simultaneously Westernization or Americanization, de-Wester- nization or de-Americanization, process and counter-process.
    [Show full text]
  • The Asian Games and the Relations Between North and South Korea ', Sport in Society
    Edinburgh Research Explorer Do the scale and scope of the event matter? Citation for published version: Lee, J-W 2016, 'Do the scale and scope of the event matter? The Asian Games and the relations between North and South Korea ', Sport in Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2015.1088723 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.1080/17430437.2015.1088723 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Peer reviewed version Published In: Sport in Society Publisher Rights Statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Sport in Society on 13/10/2015, available online: http://wwww.tandfonline.com/10.1080/17430437.2015.1088723 General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 01. Oct. 2021 SPORT IN SOCIETY SPECIALL ISSUE Do the scale and scope of the event matter? The Asian Games and the relations between North and South Korea By Jung Woo Lee The University of Edinburgh Submission Date: 25 April 2015 1 Do the scale and scope of the event matter? The Asian Games and the relations between North and South Korea Abstract This paper examines the political dimension of the Asian Games.
    [Show full text]
  • List of References
    MAJOR INTERNATIONAL REFERENCES NOTE: Listed herein are only those reference jobs that are known to us. Many competitions, tournaments, etc are staged in existing venues that have Schelde equipment. Also, huge quantities of Schelde equipment are shipped to overseas distributors, whereby the end users/ project names are not known to us. Such event references and project names will therefore not be found in below listing. CHAMPIONSHIPS / TOURNAMENTS FIBA World Tour 3x3, Debrecen, Hungary, 2020 World Cup China, 2019 FIBA World Tour 3x3 Saskatoon, Prague, Lausanne, Debrecen, Montreal, Los Angeles, Nanjing, Jeddah, Utsunomiya, 2019 Women World League Final 3x3, Udine, Italy, 2019 U23 World Cup 3x3, Lanzhou, China, 2019 U18 Asia Cup 3x3, Kuching, Malaysia, 2019 World Cup 3x3, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 2019 SAL 3x3, Cabo Verde, 2019 Summer European Youth Olympic Festival, Azerbadjan, 2019 African Games 2019, Maroc, 2019 Pan American Games, Peru, 2019 Youth Olympic Games Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2018 Asian Games, Indonesia, 2018 FIBA World Tour 3x3 Saskatoon, Utsunomiya, Prague, Lausanne, Debrecen, Mexico City, Hyderabad, Chengdu, Penang, 2018 Jeux Africains de la Jeunesse, Algeria, 2018 FIBA 3x3 European Championship Urban Week, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 2017 FIBA World Tour 3x3 Saskatoon, Utsunomiya, Prague, Lausanne, Debrecen, Chengdu, Mexico City, Beijing, 2017 Chengdu FIBA 3X3 World Challenging LOC, China, 2016 FIBA World Tour 3x3 Mexico City, Utsunomiya, Prague, Lausanne, Debrecen, Beijing, Abu Dhabi, 2016 Asia U18 Championships, Malaysia,
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Urban Planning & Management
    1. Urban Planning & Management Writer : Seoul Institute Dr. Sun-Wung Kim Policy Area: Urban Planning Urban Planning & Management 9 1 Trends in Urban Planning & Development by Time Period Before the fall of the Joseon dynasty, Seoul underwent gradual changes in space, focused mainly on the center of the walled city, Mapo, and Yeongdeungpo. After liberation from Japanese colonial rule and into the 1960s, the city experienced an explosive growth in population and urban development. In 1966, the Basic Urban Plan was set up to respond to these changes and to lead the change through a long-term vision with systematic and comprehensive planning. Today, Seoul’s urban development serves as a model to other part- nering economies. After liberation from colonial rule, Seoul began its struggle to overcome post-war chaos and modernize. City development began in the 1960s with Seoul’s efforts toward land readjustment of the city into districts, which had started under Japanese colonial rule, and establishment of an infrastructure to connect districts. Construction of the Gyeongbu Expressway in 1968 was soon followed by rapid national economic growth in the 1970s, laying the foundation for the improvement of urban housing and infrastructure. One of the most noteworthy phenomena of the time was the start of growth management through the development of Gangnam and areas designated as development prohibited areas. The 1980s were marked by urban growth, with the upcoming Seoul Olympics in 1988. Seoul introduced a new urban design in roads such as Eulji-ro and Tehran-ro towards quality management through control of land use, development density, building height, and other factors.
    [Show full text]
  • The Seoul Olympic Games and Korean Society : Causes, Context and Consequences
    Loughborough University Institutional Repository The Seoul Olympic Games and Korean society : causes, context and consequences This item was submitted to Loughborough University's Institutional Repository by the/an author. Additional Information: • Doctoral Thesis. Submitted in partial fullment of the requirements for the award of Doctor of Philosophy of Loughborough University. Metadata Record: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/12893 Publisher: c Ji Hyun Cho Please cite the published version. This item was submitted to Loughborough University as a PhD thesis by the author and is made available in the Institutional Repository (https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/) under the following Creative Commons Licence conditions. For the full text of this licence, please go to: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ ._ Loughborough ., University University Library Author/Filing Title ...............?Jf. .C? .......................... ........................................................................................ { Class Mark .................................................................... Please note that fines are charged on ALL overdue items. · , 1~~I~i~ro I I~lllllllml The Seoul Olympic Games and Korean Society: Causes, context and consequences by JiHyun Cho A Doctoral Thesis Submitted in Partial fulfilment ofthe Requirements for the Award of The Degree of Doctor of Philosophy of Loughborough University September 2009 Supervisor: Professor Alan Baimer School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences © Ji Hy"n Cho (2009) .--~....,,-.--.-.--.. ---,,=~,------------ i,~,:·,;.·,,:·,r'(::):)\\, ----- r~~~4 I'~~':~'~l';'"; ~,,;.~~ . ,- .. I 'V) ~~,\ ,.,.,~ ~::J 1 ABSTRACT The overall aim of the research project is to investigate the alms and the consequences of the 1988 Seoul Olympic Games. The Seoul Olympics took place over twenty years ago, and the event has had a significant impact on South Korean society which is best explained by reference to theories of globalization and mega events.
    [Show full text]