DOCSLIB.ORG

1 FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM Fleetboston Financial Corporation Boston, Massachusetts Order Approving the Merger of Bank Holding Comp

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM Fleetboston Financial Corporation Boston, Massachusetts Order Approving the Merger of Bank Holding Comp 1 FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM FleetBoston Financial Corporation Boston, Massachusetts Order Approving the Merger of Bank Holding Companies FleetBoston Financial Corporation (“FleetBoston”), a financial holding company within the meaning of the Bank Holding Company Act (“BHC Act”), has requested the Board’s approval under the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. § 1841 et seq.) to merge with Summit Bancorp., Princeton (“Summit”), and thereby acquire Summit’s subsidiary banks, including its lead subsidiary bank, Summit Bank, Hackensack, both in New Jersey (“Summit-NJ”).1 FleetBoston also provided notice under section 25 of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. § 601 et seq.) and the Board's Regulation K (12 C.F.R. 211) of its intention to acquire Summit International Trade Finance Corp., also in Princeton (“Summit International”), an agreement corporation subsidiary of Summit-NJ.2 Notice of the proposal, affording interested persons an opportunity to submit comments, has been published (65 Federal Register 69,109 (2000)). The time for filing comments has expired, and the Board has considered the proposal and all comments received during the comment period in light of the factors set forth in the BHC Act and the Federal Reserve Act. 1 FleetBoston also would acquire Summit’s other subsidiary banks: Summit Bank, Norwalk, Connecticut (“Summit-CT”); and Summit Bank, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania (“Summit-PA”). 2 In addition, FleetBoston has requested the Board’s approval to exercise an option to acquire up to 19.9 percent of Summit’s voting shares. The option would expire on consummation of the proposal. 2 FleetBoston, with total consolidated assets of approximately $179 billion, is the eighth largest commercial banking organization in the United States.3 FleetBoston operates subsidiary banks in Connecticut, Florida, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, and Rhode Island. FleetBoston operates the fourth largest depository institution in New Jersey, controlling deposits of $8.8 billion, representing approximately 6.3 percent of total deposits in insured depository institutions in the state (“state deposits”).4 In Connecticut, FleetBoston operates the largest depository institution, controlling deposits of $15 billion, representing approximately 25.5 percent of state deposits. Summit, with total consolidated assets of approximately $39.5 billion, is the 27th largest commercial banking organization in the United States. Summit operates subsidiary banks in Connecticut, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania. Summit operates the largest depository institution in New Jersey, controlling deposits of $20.8 billion, representing approximately 14.8 percent of state deposits. In Connecticut, Summit operates the 12th largest depository institution, controlling deposits of $909 million, representing approximately 1.6 percent of state deposits. In Pennsylvania, Summit operates the 10th largest depository institution, controlling deposits of $2.8 billion, representing approximately 1.5 percent of state deposits. On consummation of the proposal and after accounting for the proposed divestiture discussed in this order, Fleet would become the seventh 3 Asset data are as of September 30, 2000. National ranking data are as of September 30, 2000, adjusted for transactions consummated since that date. 4 State deposit and ranking data are as of June 30, 1999, and reflect acquisitions as of October 2, 2000, for Connecticut, as of September 27, 2000, for New Jersey, and as of February 5, 2001, for Pennsylvania. In this context, depository institutions include commercial banks, savings banks, and savings associations. 3 largest commercial banking organization in the United States, with total consolidated assets of approximately $218.6 billion. On consummation, FleetBoston would become the largest banking organization in New Jersey, controlling deposits of $29.6 billion, representing approximately 20.9 percent of state deposits. In Connecticut, FleetBoston would control deposits of $15.9 billion, representing approximately 27.1 percent of state deposits. Interstate Analysis Section 3(d) of the BHC Act allows the Board to approve an application by a bank holding company to acquire control of a bank located in a state other than the home state of the bank holding company if certain conditions are met. For purposes of the BHC Act, the home state of FleetBoston is Rhode Island,5 and Summit’s subsidiary banks are located in Connecticut, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania.6 The Board may not approve a proposal subject to section 3(d) if, after consummation, the applicant would control more than 10 percent of the total deposits of insured depository institutions in the United States.7 In addition, the Board may not approve a proposal if, on consummation of the proposal, the applicant would control 30 percent or more of the total deposits of insured depository institutions in any state in which both the applicant and the 5 A bank holding company’s home state is that state in which the total deposits of all banking subsidiaries of the company were the largest on July 1, 1966, or the date on which the company became a bank holding company, whichever is later. 12 U.S.C. § 1841(o)(4)(C). 6 For purposes of section 3(d), the Board considers a bank to be located in the states in which the bank is chartered, headquartered, or operates a branch. 7 12 U.S.C. § 1842(d)(2)(A). For this purpose, insured depository institutions include all insured banks, savings banks, and savings associations. 4 organization to be acquired operate an insured depository institution, or such higher or lower percentage as established by state law. 8 On consummation of the proposal, FleetBoston would control 2.8 percent of the total deposits of insured depository institutions in the United States.9 FleetBoston would control less than 30 percent of total deposits held by insured depository institutions in Connecticut and New Jersey,10 and would not exceed the state deposit caps of Connecticut or New Jersey.11 All other requirements of section 3(d) of the BHC Act also are met. FleetBoston is adequately capitalized and adequately managed, as defined by applicable law. In addition, Summit’s subsidiary banks have been in existence for the minimum age requirements established by applicable state law.12 In view of all the facts of record, the Board is permitted to approve the proposal under section 3(d) of the BHC Act. 8 12 U.S.C. § 1842(d)(2)(B)-(D). 9 Data as of June 30, 2000. 10 On consummation, FleetBoston would control 27.1 percent of insured depository institution deposits in Connecticut and 20.9 percent of insured depository institution deposits in New Jersey. FleetBoston currently does not control an insured depository institution in Pennsylvania. 11 See Conn. Gen. Stat. Ann. § 36a-411 (West 2000) (30 percent); N.J. Stat. Ann. § 17:9A-413 (West 2000) (30 percent). Pennsylvania does not have a deposit cap that is applicable to the proposal. 12 12 U.S.C. § 1842(d)(2)(A). See Conn. Gen. Stat. Ann. § 36a-411 (West 2000) (5 year minimum age requirement). Neither New Jersey nor Pennsylvania has an age requirement that is applicable to the proposal. The Board also has taken into account FleetBoston’s record of compliance with applicable state community reinvestment laws. 5 Competitive Considerations Section 3 of the BHC Act prohibits the Board from approving a proposal that would result in a monopoly or would be in furtherance of an attempt to monopolize the business of banking in any part of the United States. Section 3 also prohibits the Board from approving a proposal that would substantially lessen competition in any relevant banking market unless the anticompetitive effects of the proposal in that banking market are clearly outweighed in the public interest by the probable effect of the proposal in meeting the convenience and needs of the community to be served.13 The Board has reviewed carefully the competitive effects of the proposal in the relevant banking markets in light of comments received14 and all the facts of record. In particular, the Board has considered the number of competitors that would remain in the markets, the relative shares of total deposits in depository institutions in the markets (“market deposits”) controlled by the companies involved in this transaction,15 the concentration levels of market deposits and the increase in these levels as measured by the Herfindahl- 13 12 U.S.C. § 1842(c)(1). 14 Two commenters expressed concern that the proposal would have anticompetitive effects in certain banking markets. 15 Market share data are as of June 30, 1999, and are based on calculations that include the deposits of thrift institutions at 50 percent. The Board previously has indicated that thrift institutions have become, or have the potential to become, significant competitors of commercial banks. See, e.g., Midwest Financial Group, 75 Federal Reserve Bulletin 386 (1989); National City Corporation, 70 Federal Reserve Bulletin 743 (1984). Thus, the Board has regularly included thrift deposits in the calculation of market share on a 50-percent weighted basis. See, e.g., First Hawaiian, Inc., 77 Federal Reserve Bulletin 52 (1991). 6 Hirschman Index (“HHI”) under the Department of Justice Merger Guidelines (“DOJ Guidelines”), and other characteristics of the markets.16 FleetBoston and Summit compete directly in five banking markets. Consummation of the proposal without divestitures would be consistent with Board precedent and the DOJ Guidelines in four of these markets.17 On consummation, three of these markets would remain moderately concentrated and one market would be unconcentrated as measured by the DOJ Guidelines. Numerous banking competitors would remain in each of these markets. 16 Under the DOJ Guidelines, 49 Federal Register 26,823 (1984), a market is considered unconcentrated if the post-merger HHI is below 1000, moderately concentrated if the post-merger HHI is between 1000 and 1800, and highly concentrated if the post-merger HHI is above 1800.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Page 1 of 9 CEO May Be Rethinking Bofa's 'Crown Jewel'
    CEO may be rethinking BofA's 'crown jewel' - Daily Report Page 1 of 9 • Law.com Home • Newswire • LawJobs • CLE Center • An incisivemedia website Welcome Megan My Account | Sign Out Get premi 3:17 P.M. EST Subscribe Thursday, February 05, 2009 Rec Home News Sections Court Opinions Court Calendars Public Notices Bench Boo Search Site: help News Articles Court Opinions Court Calendars Public Tuesday, January 13, 2009 Re CEO may be rethinking BofA's 'crown jewel' Lewis faces culture clash with retail bank's acquisition of Merrill Lynch By Edward Robinson, Bloomberg News Al When Kenneth Lewis, chief executive officer of Bank of America Corp., unveiled the acquisition of Merrill Lynch & Co. on Sept. 15, he called its 16,000-strong brokerage group the firm's “crown jewel.” Only a month later, the brokers were rebelling against their new parent. M Members of the Thundering Herd were steamed over the Bank of America • F employment contract they were asked to sign. Merrill was part of an industry • D group that let departing brokers who joined another member firm take their clients • H with them. The contract suggested that Bank of America might not join the group or honor the agreement. • L • E The advisers ridiculed their incoming retail banking bosses as “toaster salesmen” who didn't appreciate the bonds of the broker-client relationship. Some advisers AP threatened to walk, with their customers in tow, before the contract could go into effect, says a Merrill broker with 25 years of experience who requested Courtesy Bloomberg News confidentiality. Kenneth Lewis has been ridiculed by incoming Merrill Lewis, who has never displayed much affection for Wall Street, saw his $40.4 Lynch advisers as a “toaster billion acquisition devolving into a confrontation with the very people he'd praised salesman” who doesn't as Merrill's No.
    [Show full text]
  • In Re: Fleetboston Financial Corporation Securities Litigation 02-CV
    Case 2:02-cv-04561-GEB-MCA Document 28 Filed 04/23/2004 Page 1 of 36 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Civ. No. 02-4561 (WGB) IN RE FLEETBOSTON FINANCIAL CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION O P I N I O N APPEARANCES: Gary S. Graifman, Esq. Benjamin Benson, Esq. KANTROWITZ, GOLDHAMER & GRAIFMAN 210 Summit Avenue Montvale, New Jersey 07645 Liaison Counsel for Plaintiffs Samuel H. Rudman, Esq. CAULEY GELLER BOWMAN & COATES, LLP 200 Broadhollow Road, Suite 406 Melville, NY 11747 Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs Joseph H. Weiss, Esq. WEISS & YOURMAN 551 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1600 New York, New York 10176 Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs Jules Brody, Esq. Howard T. Longman, Esq. STULL, STULL & BRODY 6 East 45 th Street New York, New York 10017 Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs 1 Case 2:02-cv-04561-GEB-MCA Document 28 Filed 04/23/2004 Page 2 of 36 David M. Meisels, Esq. HERRICK, FEINSTEIN LLP 2 Penn Plaza Newark, NJ 07105-2245 Mitchell Lowenthal, Esq. Jeffrey Rosenthal, Esq. CLEARY, GOTTLIEB, STEEN & HAMILTON One Liberty Plaza New York, NY 10006 Attorneys for Defendants BASSLER, DISTRICT JUDGE: This is a putative securities class action brought on behalf of all persons or entities except Defendants, who exchanged shares of Summit Bancorp (“Summit”) common stock for shares of FleetBoston Financial Corporation (“FBF”) common stock in connection with the merger between FBF and Summit. Defendants FBF and the individual Defendants 1 (collectively “Defendants”) move to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Amended Complaint (“the Amended Complaint”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 12(b)(6).
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Decision 2004-9
    O Comptroller of the Currency Administrator of National Banks Central District Office One Financial Place, Suite 2700 440 South LaSalle Street Chicago, Illinois 60605 Corporate Decision #2004-9 May 18, 2004 June 2004 Robert L. Freedman, P.C. Silver, Freedman & Taff 1700 Wisconsin Ave., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20007 Subject: Application to convert First Security Federal Savings Bank into FSFSB, N.A.; Application to merge FSFSB, N.A. with and into MB Financial Bank, N.A. under the title and charter of the latter. Charter Number 13684. Application Control Number: 2004-CE-02-003 Dear Mr. Freedman: This is to inform you that as of the date of this letter the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) approved the application to convert First Security Federal Savings Bank, Chicago, Illinois (“FSB”), into FSFSB, N.A., and retain its branches after the conversion, and the application to merge FSFSB, N.A., with and into MB Financial Bank, N.A., Chicago, Illinois (“MBFB”), under the charter and title of the latter, pursuant to the OCC’s authority under 12 U.S.C. § 215a. The main office of MBFB will continue to be the main office of the merged institution. The OCC also approved MBFB’s request for the resulting bank to retain FSFSB, N.A.’s main office and branches, as well as MBFB’s branches, as branches after the merger under 12 U.S.C. § 36(b)(2). MBFB is a wholly owned subsidiary of MB Financial, Inc. (“MB”), a Maryland corporation and a financial holding company, headquartered in Chicago, Illinois.1 FSB is a wholly owned subsidiary of First SecurityFed Financial, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporations with Matching Gift Programs
    Corporations with Matching Gift Programs You can double your donation by asking your employer if they have a matching gift program. We’ve compiled this list of companies that match from outside sources, so we can’t guarantee its accuracy or completeness. Ask your employer if your donation is eligible! Abbot Laboratories Bechtel Group, Inc. Accenture Becton Dickinson ADVANTA Behring Diagnostics, Inc. Aetna, Inc. Beneficial Management Corporation Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. BOC Gases Allendale Mutual Insurance Company The Boeing Company Alliance Capital Bristol-Meyers Squibb Company Management Corporation, LP Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation AlliedSignal, Inc. Allmerica Financial Campbell Soup Company AMBAC, Inc. Cape Savings Bank Amerada Hess Corporation Cargill, Inc. American Cyanamid Company Carolina Power & Light Company American Express Company Carter-Wallace, Inc. American Home Products Corporation CBS, Inc. American Standard, Inc. Certain Teed Corporation Amgen, Inc. CGU Ammirati Puris Lintas Chase Manhattan Foundation The ARA Group, Inc. Chrysler Corporation Aramark Chubb & Son, Inc. ARCO Chemical Company Ciba Corning Diagnostics Corp. Arthur Anderson LLP Ciba-Geigy Corporation Aon Corporation Ciba Specialty Chemicals Applied Technology CIGNA Corporation Arthur Young CITGO Petroleum Corporation Atlantic City Electric Company Liz Claiborne Atlantic Electric CMS Energy AT&T CNA Insurance Company Automatic Data Processing, Inc. Coca Cola Aventis Behring L.L.C. Colgate-Palmolive Company Aventis Pharmaceuticals Products, Inc. Computer Associates International, Inc. Avery Dennison Corporation ConAgra, Inc. Avon Products, Inc. Conectiv Congoleum Corporation Ball Corporation Consumers Water Company Bankers Trust Company The Continental Corporation Bank of America Corning Incorporated Bank of Montreal Comair, Inc. The Bank of New York Crompton & Knowles Corporation Bankers Trust Company CSX, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Reserve Bulletin December 1991
    VOLUME 77 • NUMBER 12 • DECEMBER 1991 FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM, WASHINGTON, D.C. PUBLICATIONS COMMITTEE Joseph R. Coyne, Chairman • S. David Frost • Griffith L. Garwood • Donald L. Kohn • J. Virgil Mattingly, Jr. • Michael J. Prell • Edwin M. Truman The Federal Reserve Bulletin is issued monthly under the direction of the staff publications committee. This committee is responsible for opinions expressed except in official statements and signed articles. It is assisted by the Economic Editing Section headed by S. Ellen Dykes, the Graphics Center under the direction of Peter G. Thomas, and Publications Services supervised by Linda C. Kyles. Table of Contents 967 AN UPDATE ON THE FARM ECONOMY believes that more sweeping changes are premature at this time, before the Subcommit- The latter part of the 1980s was a relatively tee on Telecommunications and Finance of the prosperous time for farmers. In 1990, how- House Committee on Energy and Commerce, ever, prices fell sharply in some parts of the October 25, 1991. farm economy, and in 1991, weakness in the sector has become more widespread. A soften- ing of the farm economy perhaps rekindles 992 ANNOUNCEMENTS memories of the farm financial stresses of the Final modifications of risk-based capital first half of the 1980s. But overall, imbalances guidelines. in the sector are far less pronounced than those of the early 1980s, and its vulnerability to Fee schedules of the Federal Reserve Banks financial setback has been reduced. for 1992. Publication of the revised Lists of Marginable 980 INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION AND CAPACITY OTC Stocks and of Foreign Margin Stocks.
    [Show full text]
  • Fleetboston Financial Savings Plan Bank of America Corporation 50 Kennedy Plaza Providence, RI 02903
    Table of Contents SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20549 Form 11-K (Mark One) x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 OR ¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File Number 1-6523 A. Full title of the plan and the address of the plan, if different from that of the issuer named below: FleetBoston Financial Savings Plan Bank of America Corporation 50 Kennedy Plaza Providence, RI 02903 B. Name of issuer of the securities held pursuant to the plan and the address of its principal executive office: Bank of America Corporation Bank of America Corporate Center Charlotte, NC 28255 Table of Contents FleetBoston Financial Savings Plan Financial Statements and Supplemental Schedule for the Year ended December 31, 2003 Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Consent of ERNST & YOUNG LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Table of Contents FleetBoston Financial Savings Plan Financial Statements and Supplemental Schedule Year ended December 31, 2003 Contents Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 1 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 2 Audited Financial Statements Statements of Net Assets Available for Benefits 3 Statement of Changes in Net Assets Available for Benefits 4 Notes to Financial Statements 5 Supplemental Schedule * Schedule H, Line 4i, Schedule of Assets (Held at End of Year) 16 * Other Supplemental Schedules required by Section 2520-103-10 of the Department of Labor’s Rules and Regulations for Reporting and Disclosure under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 have been omitted because they are not applicable.
    [Show full text]
  • School of Economics & Business Administration Master of Science in Management “MERGERS and ACQUISITIONS in the GREEK BANKI
    School of Economics & Business Administration Master of Science in Management “MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS IN THE GREEK BANKING SECTOR.” Panolis Dimitrios 1102100134 Teti Kondyliana Iliana 1102100002 30th September 2010 Acknowledgements We would like to thank our families for their continuous economic and psychological support and our colleagues in EFG Eurobank Ergasias Bank and Marfin Egnatia Bank for their noteworthy contribution to our research. Last but not least, we would like to thank our academic advisor Dr. Lida Kyrgidou, for her significant assistance and contribution. Panolis Dimitrios Teti Kondyliana Iliana ii Abstract M&As is a phenomenon that first appeared in the beginning of the 20th century, increased during the first decade of the 21st century and is expected to expand in the foreseeable future. The current global crisis is one of the most determining factors affecting M&As‟ expansion. The scope of this dissertation is to examine the M&As that occurred in the Greek banking context, focusing primarily on the managerial dimension associated with the phenomenon, taking employees‟ perspective with regard to M&As into consideration. Two of the largest banks in Greece, EFG EUROBANK ERGASIAS and MARFIN EGNATIA BANK, which have both experienced M&As, serve as the platform for the current study. Our results generate important theoretical and managerial implications and contribute to the applicability of the phenomenon, while providing insight with regard to M&As‟ future within the next years. Keywords: Mergers &Acquisitions, Greek banking sector iii Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1 2. Literature Review .......................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Streams of Research in M&As ................................................................................ 4 2.1.1 The Effect of M&As on banks‟ performance ..................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Staff Study 174
    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Staff Study 174 Bank Mergers and Banking Structure in the United States, 1980–98 Stephen A. Rhoades August 2000 The following list includes all the staff studies published 171. The Cost of Bank Regulation: A Review of the Evidence, since November 1995. Single copies are available free of by Gregory Elliehausen. April 1998. 35 pp. charge from Publications Services, Board of Governors of 172. Using Subordinated Debt as an Instrument of Market the Federal Reserve System, Washington, DC 20551. To be Discipline, by Federal Reserve System Study Group on added to the mailing list or to obtain a list of earlier staff Subordinated Notes and Debentures. December 1999. studies, please contact Publications Services. 69 pp. 168. The Economics of the Private Equity Market, by 173. Improving Public Disclosure in Banking, by Federal George W. Fenn, Nellie Liang, and Stephen Prowse. Reserve System Study Group on Disclosure. November 1995. 69 pp. March 2000. 35 pp. 169. Bank Mergers and Industrywide Structure, 1980–94, 174. Bank Mergers and Banking Structure in the United States, by Stephen A. Rhoades. January 1996. 29 pp. 1980–98, by Stephen A. Rhoades. August 2000. 33 pp. 170. The Cost of Implementing Consumer Financial Regula- tions: An Analysis of Experience with the Truth in Savings Act, by Gregory Elliehausen and Barbara R. Lowrey. December 1997. 17 pp. The staff members of the Board of Governors of the The following paper is summarized in the Bulletin Federal Reserve System and of the Federal Reserve Banks for September 2000. The analyses and conclusions set forth undertake studies that cover a wide range of economic and are those of the author and do not necessarily indicate financial subjects.
    [Show full text]
  • First Quarter 2004
    First Quarter 2004 Continued low interest rates and improved credit quality helped Second, competition has squeezed margins in traditional commercial banks to report outstanding performance during the first quarter of banking. This causes banks to look for alternative sources of revenue 2004. The nation’s largest banks earned a return on average assets by offering their customers a greater variety of financial services under 1 (ROA) of 1.3 percent, while community banks reported an ROA of one roof, presumably at lower cost (scope economies). 1.2 percent. The economic recovery has contributed to improved asset A large number of studies have examined economies of scale and 2 quality, manifested in fewer delinquencies and charge-offs, especially scope in banking. The overall conclusion of empirical studies on scale in commercial and industrial (C&I) loans. The Federal Reserve Board efficiencies is that there appears to be little or no improvement in cost recently reported that the delinquency rate on all types of loans de- efficiency from bank mergers except at small banks with assets of up to clined to 2.19 percent, the lowest level since the end of 2000. The $100 million. The evidence on scale economies at large banks is mixed. delinquency rate for C&I loans declined from 3.8 percent in 2002 to On the one hand, greater bank size implies the potential for improved 2.87 percent last quarter. Similarly, the charge-off rate for C&I loans diversification at a given level of return, and enhanced diversification fell from its recent peak of 2.16 percent in the fourth quarter of 2001 reduces the cost of risk management.
    [Show full text]
  • These Are the Media Networks Which Has a 90% Approval Rate. We Are
    These are the media networks which has a 90% approval rate. We are quite certain that we can place your press release(provided its under the guidelines) to all these sites. 1. Newsday Media Group 2. The Boston Globe 3. The International Business Times 4. The San Francisco Chronicle 5. The Star Tribune 6. Business Insider 7. Houston Chronicle 8. Daily Herald 9. CBS News 10. The Miami Herald 11. The San Jose Mercury News 12. The Sun News 13. The Kansas City Star 14. WCCO-TV Minneapolis 15. United Press International (UPI) 16. Star-Telegram.com 17. CBS Chicago 18. CBS Baltimore 19. The Columbus Dispatch 20. The News & Observer 21. WRAL.com 22. StreetInsider.com, Inc. 23. Contra Costa Times 24. El Nuevo Herald 25. The Olympian 26. NewsOK 27. The Daily Breeze 28. Minyanville Media 29. The Sacramento Bee 30. The Press-Enterprise 31. El Paso Times 32. The Long Beach Press-Telegram 33. Breaking Media 34. The Lexington Herald-Leader 35. The Time Union 36. The Los Angeles Daily News 37. The Wichita Eagle 38. Remark Media 39. The Sun Herald 40. Pasadena Star-News 41. Minnesota Public Radio News 42. The Anchorage Daily News 43. AFB Media LLC 44. The News Tribune 45. Bay Area News Group 46. The Bellingham Herald 47. Whittier Daily News 48. Centre Daily Times 49. The State 50. The San Diego Union-Tribune 51. The Buffalo News 52. Best Growth Stock LLC 53. San Gabriel Valley Tribune 54. Redlands Daily Facts 55. Scripps Interactive Newspapers Group 56. Digital Media Wire, Inc 57.
    [Show full text]
  • Consolidation and Merger Activity in the United States Banking Industry from 2000 Through 2010
    Finance and Economics Discussion Series Divisions of Research & Statistics and Monetary Affairs Federal Reserve Board, Washington, D.C. Consolidation and Merger Activity in the United States Banking Industry from 2000 through 2010 Robert M. Adams 2012-51 NOTE: Staff working papers in the Finance and Economics Discussion Series (FEDS) are preliminary materials circulated to stimulate discussion and critical comment. The analysis and conclusions set forth are those of the authors and do not indicate concurrence by other members of the research staff or the Board of Governors. References in publications to the Finance and Economics Discussion Series (other than acknowledgement) should be cleared with the author(s) to protect the tentative character of these papers. Consolidation and Merger Activity in the United States Banking Industry from 2000 through 2010 Robert M. Adams1 August 8, 2012 Abstract This study investigates trends in consolidation and merger activity in the United States banking industry from 2000 through 2010. Over this period, the U.S. banking industry has consistently experienced over 150 mergers annually, with the largest banking organizations holding an increasing share of banking assets. While the industry has undergone considerable consolidation at the national level, local banking markets have not experienced significant increases in concentration. The dynamics of consolidation raise concerns about competition, output, efficiency, and financial stability. This study uses a comprehensive proprietary data set to examine mergers and acquisitions involving banks and thrifts. The methodology in this paper expands the definition of mergers to include more types of transactions than previous studies on bank mergers. Keywords: Banking, Mergers, Antitrust 1Division of Research and Statistics, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, DC 20551.
    [Show full text]
  • View Annual Report
    Bank of America Summary Annual Report 2005 How We Grow A key part of how we grow at Bank of America is our associates’ commitment to customer satisfaction and sales at our more than 5,800 banking centers nationwide, including the Clark © 2006 Bank of America Corporation & Madison Banking Center in 00-04-1354B 3/2006 the heart of Chicago’s fi nancial district, managed by Sandy Pierce and her team. s 2005 Summary Annual Report Recycled Paper 1 Bank of America 2005 A key part of how we grow at Bank of America is our associates’ commitment to customer satisfaction and sales at our more than 5,800 banking centers nationwide, including the Clark & Madison Banking Center in the heart of Chicago’s fi nancial district, managed by Sandy Pierce and her team. 1 Bank of America 2005 662058ba_1-72058ba_1-7 1 33/15/06/15/06 55:49:08:49:08 PPMM Contents Letter to Shareholders ..........................................3 Working Together ..................................................23 2005 Financial Overview .....................................8 Investing in Our Communities ....................26 How We Grow ...............................................................9 Our Businesses ........................................................30 Operating Excellence ...........................................10 Executive Officers and Directors ................31 Innovation ....................................................................16 Corporate Information .......................................32 Recognizing Opportunities ............................20
    [Show full text]