DOCSLIB.ORG

207145Orig1s000

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
207145Orig1s000 CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH APPLICATION NUMBER: 207145Orig1s000 CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND BIOPHARMACEUTICS REVIEW(S) Clinical Pharmacology/Biopharmaceutics Review PRODUCT (Generic Name): Safinamide (NW-1015) PRODUCT (Brand Name): XADAGO NDA: 207145 DOSAGE FORM: Tablets DOSAGE STRENGTHS: 50 mg and 100 mg INDICATION: Add-on therapy for the treatment of patients with Parkinson’s disease NDA TYPE: Standard SUBMISSION DATE: Dec 29, 2014 SPONSOR: Newron Pharmaceuticals PRIMARY REVIEWER: Hristina Dimova, Ph.D. REVIEWER (in vitro studies): Jagan Parepally, Ph.D. TEAM LEADER: Angela Men, M.D, Ph.D. PHARMACOMETRICS REVIEWER: Atul Bhattaram, Ph.D. PHARMACOMETRICS TEAM LEADER: Kevin Krudys, Ph.D. OCPB DIVISION: DCP-I OND DIVISION: HFD-120 1 Reference ID: 3855514 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................... 2 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ 4 1.1 RECOMMENDATION ............................................................................................................ 5 1.2 OVERALL SUMMARY OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND BIOPHARMACEUTICS FINDINGS ................................................................................................................................................ 5 2.0 QUESTION BASED REVIEW ....................................................................................................... 8 2.1 GENERAL ATTRIBUTES ......................................................................................................... 8 2.1.1 Drug/Drug Product Information: ................................................................ 8 2.1.2 Mechanism of action and therapeutic indication: ...................................... 9 2.1.3 Proposed dosages and route of administration: ......................................... 9 2.2 GENERAL CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY ...........................................................................10 2.2.1 What are the clinical studies used to support dosing or claims and what are their design features? ........................................................................................ 10 2.2.2 What are the clinical endpoints and how are they measured in clinical pharmacology and clinical studies? ........................................................................ 12 2.2.3 What are the characteristics of exposure/effectiveness relationships? .. 13 2.2.4 What are the characteristics of exposure-safety relationships? ............. 13 2.2.5 Are the proposed dosage regimens adequately supported by the clinical trials and consistent with the dose-response relationship? .................................. 14 2.2.6 Does Safinamide prolong QT or QTc interval? ....................................... 14 2.2.7 Are the active moieties in the plasma (or other biological fluid) appropriately identified and measured to assess pharmacokinetic parameters? 14 2.2.9 What are the basic pharmacokinetic parameters of safinamide after single and multiple doses? ....................................................................................... 20 2.2.10 Do the pharmacokinetic parameters change with time following chronic dosing? 21 2.2.11 What is the variability in the PK data? ................................................... 21 2.2.12 How do the pharmacokinetics of the drug in healthy volunteers compare to that in patients? .................................................................................................... 22 2.2.13 Based on the pharmacokinetic parameters, what is the degree of linearity or nonlinearity in the dose-concentration relationship? ....................... 23 2.3 INTRINSIC FACTORS ...........................................................................................................25 2.3.1 What intrinsic factors influence exposure and/or response and what is the impact of any differences in exposure on the pharmacodynamics? Based on what is known about exposure response relationships and their variability, is dosage adjustment needed for any of the subgroups? .......................................... 26 2.3.1.6 Hepatic Impairment: ..................................................................................................................... 26 2.3.1.7 Renal Impairment: ........................................................................................................................ 29 2.4 EXTRINSIC FACTORS ................................................................................................................33 2.4.1 Is safinamide a substrate, inhibitor or inducer of CYP enzymes? ......... 33 2.4.2 Is the drug or its major metabolite, a substrate, an inhibitor and/or an inducer of transporter processes? ........................................................................... 36 2 Reference ID: 3855514 2.4.4 What extrinsic factors (such as herbal products, diet, smoking and alcohol) influence exposure and or response and what is the impact of any differences in exposure on pharmacodynamics? ................................................... 39 I. Tyramine-containing food or beverages ................................................................................................ 39 2.4.5 Are there any in-vivo drug-drug interaction studies that indicate the exposure alone and/or exposure response relationships are different when drugs are coadministered? If yes, is there a need for dosage adjustment? ................... 40 2.4.5.1 Influence of other drugs on safinamide: ..................................................................................... 40 II. Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) ....................................................................................................... 40 III. Ketoconazole DDI Study (Study 28778) ...................................................................................... 41 IV. Enzyme Inducers ........................................................................................................................... 42 2.4.5.2 Influence of safinamide on other drugs ...................................................................................... 42 V. Interaction with Levodopa (Study 28780 and EMR701165-027) ........................................................ 42 VI. Interaction with CYP1A2 Substrate (Caffeine) and CYP3A4 Substrate (Midazolam), Study EMR701165_026 .............................................................................................................................................. 45 VII. Potential pharmacodynamics interactions .................................................................................. 47 2.5 GENERAL BIOPHARMACEUTICS .....................................................................................48 2.5.1 Based on the BCS principles, in what class is this drug and formulation? What solubility, permeability and dissolution data support this classification? ............................................................................................................ 48 2.5.2 Is the proposed to-be-marketed formulation bioequivalent to the formulation used in the clinical trials and pharmacokinetic studies? ................. 49 2.5.3 What is the effect of food on the bioavailability of the drug from the dosage form? What dosing recommendations need to be made regarding the administration of safinamide in relation to meals or meal types? ....................... 52 2.6 ANALYTICAL .........................................................................................................................53 2.6.1 What bioanalytical method is used to assess concentrations of active moieties and is the validation complete and acceptable?...................................... 53 3 Reference ID: 3855514 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Safinamide is a new chemical entity whose mechanism of action includes voltage gated sodium channel blockade, inhibition of release of glutamate, and selective, reversible inhibition of Monoamine Oxidase B (MAO-B), thus producing both non-dopaminergic and dopaminergic pharmacological effects. The sponsor seeks approval for safinamide as adjunct therapy for the treatment of subjects with idiopathic Parkinson’s disease (PD) as add-on to: • a single DA-agonist at a stable dose in early-stage (b) (4) PD patients and • (b) (4) levodopa (LD) alone or in combination with other PD medications in mid- to late-stage (b) (4) patients *Note: Safinamide will not be recommended for early PD Safinamide is formulated for oral administration as an immediate-release tablet (50 mg and 100 mg). The clinical program for safinamide included 37 trials: 20 Phase I, 8 Phase II, and 9 Phase III trials. A total of 3184 subjects were enrolled in these trials: 607 subjects were enrolled in non-therapeutic trials, and 2519 subjects with PD were enrolled in therapeutic trials. In addition, 41 in vitro studies have been submitted in the NDA, addressing the absorption, distribution, biotransformation and drug-drug interaction (DDI) potential of safinamide. The efficacy of safinamide as add-on treatment in mid-to late-stage PD (LSPD) patients with motor fluctuations currently receiving LD alone or in combination with other PD medications was evaluated in two double-blind, placebo-controlled studies: SETTLE (Study 27919; 50-100 mg/day; 24 weeks), and Study 016/018 (50 and 100 mg/day; 2- year, double-blind, placebo-controlled study).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Addictions and the Brain
    9/18/2012 Addictions and the Brain TAAP Conference September 14, 2012 Acknowledgements • La Hacienda Treatment Center • American Society of Addiction Medicine • National Institute of Drug Abuse © 2012 La Hacienda Treatment Center. All rights reserved. 1 9/18/2012 Definition • A primary, progressive biochemical, psychosocial, genetically transmitted chronic disease of relapse who’s hallmarks are denial, loss of control and unmanageability. DSM IV Criteria for dependency: At least 3 of the 7 below 1. Withdrawal 2. Tolerance 3. The substance is taken in larger amounts or over a longer period than was intended. 4. There is a persistent desire or unsuccessful efforts to cut down or control substance use. 5. A great deal of time is spent in activities necessary to obtain the substance, use the substance, or recover from its effects. 6. Important social, occupational, or recreational activities are given up or reduced because of the substance use. 7. The substance use is continued despite knowledge of having a persistent or recurrent physical or psychological problem that is likely to have been caused or exacerbated by the substance. © 2012 La Hacienda Treatment Center. All rights reserved. 2 9/18/2012 Dispute between behavior and disease Present understanding of the Hypothalamus location of the disease hypothesis. © 2012 La Hacienda Treatment Center. All rights reserved. 3 9/18/2012 © 2012 La Hacienda Treatment Center. All rights reserved. 4 9/18/2012 © 2012 La Hacienda Treatment Center. All rights reserved. 5 9/18/2012 Dispute regarding behavior versus disease © 2012 La Hacienda Treatment Center. All rights reserved. 6 9/18/2012 © 2012 La Hacienda Treatment Center.
    [Show full text]
  • The In¯Uence of Medication on Erectile Function
    International Journal of Impotence Research (1997) 9, 17±26 ß 1997 Stockton Press All rights reserved 0955-9930/97 $12.00 The in¯uence of medication on erectile function W Meinhardt1, RF Kropman2, P Vermeij3, AAB Lycklama aÁ Nijeholt4 and J Zwartendijk4 1Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 2Department of Urology, Leyenburg Hospital, Leyweg 275, 2545 CH The Hague, The Netherlands; 3Pharmacy; and 4Department of Urology, Leiden University Hospital, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands Keywords: impotence; side-effect; antipsychotic; antihypertensive; physiology; erectile function Introduction stopped their antihypertensive treatment over a ®ve year period, because of side-effects on sexual function.5 In the drug registration procedures sexual Several physiological mechanisms are involved in function is not a major issue. This means that erectile function. A negative in¯uence of prescrip- knowledge of the problem is mainly dependent on tion-drugs on these mechanisms will not always case reports and the lists from side effect registries.6±8 come to the attention of the clinician, whereas a Another way of looking at the problem is drug causing priapism will rarely escape the atten- combining available data on mechanisms of action tion. of drugs with the knowledge of the physiological When erectile function is in¯uenced in a negative mechanisms involved in erectile function. The way compensation may occur. For example, age- advantage of this approach is that remedies may related penile sensory disorders may be compen- evolve from it. sated for by extra stimulation.1 Diminished in¯ux of In this paper we will discuss the subject in the blood will lead to a slower onset of the erection, but following order: may be accepted.
    [Show full text]
  • Medications and Alcohol Craving
    Medications and Alcohol Craving Robert M. Swift, M.D., Ph.D. The use of medications as an adjunct to alcoholism treatment is based on the premise that craving and other manifestations of alcoholism are mediated by neurobiological mechanisms. Three of the four medications approved in the United States or Europe for treating alcoholism are reported to reduce craving; these include naltrexone (ReVia™), acamprosate, and tiapride. The remaining medication, disulfiram (Antabuse®), may also possess some anticraving activity. Additional medications that have been investigated include ritanserin, which has not been shown to decrease craving or drinking levels in humans, and ondansetron, which shows promise for treating early onset alcoholics, who generally respond poorly to psychosocial treatment alone. Use of anticraving medications in combination (e.g., naltrexone plus acamprosate) may enhance their effectiveness. Future studies should address such issues as optimal dosing regimens and the development of strategies to enhance patient compliance. KEY WORDS: AOD (alcohol and other drug) craving; anti alcohol craving agents; alcohol withdrawal agents; drug therapy; neurobiological theory; alcohol cue; disulfiram; naltrexone; calcium acetylhomotaurinate; dopamine; serotonin uptake inhibitors; buspirone; treatment outcome; reinforcement; neurotransmitters; patient assessment; literature review riteria for defining alcoholism Results of craving research are often tions (i.e., pharmacotherapy) to improve vary widely. Most definitions difficult to interpret,
    [Show full text]
  • Questions in the Chemical Enzymology of MAO
    Review Questions in the Chemical Enzymology of MAO Rona R. Ramsay 1,* and Alen Albreht 2 1 Biomedical Sciences Research Complex, School of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 9ST, UK 2 Laboratory for Food Chemistry, Department of Analytical Chemistry, National Institute of Chemistry, Hajdrihova 19, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +44-(0)-1334-474740 Abstract: We have structure, a wealth of kinetic data, thousands of chemical ligands and clinical information for the effects of a range of drugs on monoamine oxidase activity in vivo. We have comparative information from various species and mutations on kinetics and effects of inhibition. Nevertheless, there are what seem like simple questions still to be answered. This article presents a brief summary of existing experimental evidence the background and poses questions that remain intriguing for chemists and biochemists researching the chemical enzymology of and drug design for monoamine oxidases (FAD-containing EC 4.1.3.4). Keywords: chemical mechanism; kinetic mechanism; oxidation; protein flexibility; cysteine modifica- tion; reversible/irreversible inhibition; molecular dynamics; simulation 1. Introduction Monoamine oxidase (E.C. 1.4.3.4) enzymes MAO A and MAO B are FAD-containing Citation: Ramsay, R.R.; Albreht, A. proteins located on the outer face of the mitochondrial inner membrane, retained there Questions in the Chemical Enzymology of MAO. Chemistry 2021, by hydrophobic interactions and a transmembrane helix. The redox co-factor (FAD) is 3, 959–978. https://doi.org/10.3390/ covalently attached to a cysteine and buried deep inside the protein [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Alcohol-Medication Interactions: the Acetaldehyde Syndrome
    arm Ph ac f ov l o i a g n il r a n u c o e J Journal of Pharmacovigilance Borja-Oliveira, J Pharmacovigilance 2014, 2:5 ISSN: 2329-6887 DOI: 10.4172/2329-6887.1000145 Review Article Open Access Alcohol-Medication Interactions: The Acetaldehyde Syndrome Caroline R Borja-Oliveira* University of São Paulo, School of Arts, Sciences and Humanities, São Paulo 03828-000, Brazil *Corresponding author: Caroline R Borja-Oliveira, University of São Paulo, School of Arts, Sciences and Humanities, Av. Arlindo Bettio, 1000, Ermelino Matarazzo, São Paulo 03828-000, Brazil, Tel: +55-11-30911027; E-mail: [email protected] Received date: August 21, 2014, Accepted date: September 11, 2014, Published date: September 20, 2014 Copyright: © 2014 Borja-Oliveira CR. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Abstract Medications that inhibit aldehyde dehydrogenase when coadministered with alcohol produce accumulation of acetaldehyde. Acetaldehyde toxic effects are characterized by facial flushing, nausea, vomiting, tachycardia and hypotension, symptoms known as acetaldehyde syndrome, disulfiram-like reactions or antabuse effects. Severe and even fatal outcomes are reported. Besides the aversive drugs used in alcohol dependence disulfiram and cyanamide (carbimide), several other pharmaceutical agents are known to produce alcohol intolerance, such as certain anti-infectives, as cephalosporins, nitroimidazoles and furazolidone, dermatological preparations, as tacrolimus and pimecrolimus, as well as chlorpropamide and nilutamide. The reactions are also observed in some individuals after the simultaneous use of products containing alcohol and disulfiram-like reactions inducers.
    [Show full text]
  • AN OPEN RANDOMIZED STUDY COMPARING DISULFIRAM and ACAMPROSATE in the TREATMENT of ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE AVINASH DE SOUSA* and ALAN DE SOUSA
    Alcohol & Alcoholism Vol. 40, No. 6, pp. 545–548, 2005 doi:10.1093/alcalc/agh187 Advance Access publication 25 July 2005 AN OPEN RANDOMIZED STUDY COMPARING DISULFIRAM AND ACAMPROSATE IN THE TREATMENT OF ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE AVINASH DE SOUSA* and ALAN DE SOUSA Get Well Clinic And Nursing Home, 33rd Road, Off Linking Road, Bandra, Mumbai 400050, Maharashtra State, India (Received 11 March 2005; first review notified 6 June 2005; in final revised form 21 June 2005; accepted 2 July 2005; advance access publication 25 July 2005) Abstract — Aims: To compare the efficacy of acamprosate (ACP) and disulfiram (DSF) for preventing alcoholic relapse in routine clinical practice. Methods: One hundred alcoholic men with family members who would encourage medication compliance and accom- pany them for follow-up were randomly allocated to 8 months of treatment with DSF or ACP. Weekly group psychotherapy was also available. The psychiatrist, patient, and family member were aware of the treatment prescribed. Alcohol consumption, craving, and adverse events were recorded weekly for 3 months and then fortnightly. Serum gamma glutamyl transferase was measured at the start Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/alcalc/article/40/6/545/125907 by guest on 27 September 2021 and the end of the study. Results: At the end of the trial, 93 patients were still in contact. Relapse (the consumption of >5 drinks/40 g of alcohol) occurred at a mean of 123 days with DSF compared to 71 days with ACP (P = 0.0001). Eighty-eight per cent of patients on DSF remained abstinent compared to 46% with ACP (P = 0.0002).
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2013/0165511 A1 Lederman Et Al
    US 2013 O165511A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2013/0165511 A1 Lederman et al. (43) Pub. Date: Jun. 27, 2013 (54) TREATMENT FOR COCANE ADDICTION Publication Classification (75) Inventors: Seth Lederman, NEW York, NY (US); (51) Int. Cl. Herbert Harris, Chapel Hill, NC (US) A63/37 (2006.01) A63/6 (2006.01) (73) Assignee: TONIX Pharmaceuticals Holding (52) U.S. Cl. Corp, New York, NY (US) CPC ............... A61K 31/137 (2013.01); A61K3I/I6 (2013.01) (21) Appl. No.: 13/820,338 USPC ........................................... 514/491; 514/654 (22) PCT Fled: Aug. 31, 2011 (57) ABSTRACT (86) PCT NO.: PCT/US11/O1529 A novel pharmaceutical composition is provided for the con S371 (c)(1), trol of stimulant effects, in particular treatment of cocaine (2), (4) Date: Mar. 1, 2013 addiction, or further to treatment of both cocaine and alcohol dependency, including simultaneous therapeutic dose appli Related U.S. Application Data cation or a single dose of a combined therapeutically effective (60) Provisional application No. 61/379,095, filed on Sep. composition of disulfiram and selegiline compounds or phar 1, 2010. maceutically acceptable non-toxic salt thereof. US 2013/01655 11 A1 Jun. 27, 2013 TREATMENT FOR COCANE ADDCTION the United States in 2005. In the sense of this invention the term “addiction' may be defined as a compulsive drug taking CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED or abuse condition related to “reward’ system of the afflicted APPLICATIONS: patient. The treatment of cocaine addiction or dependency 0001. The present application which claims priority from has targeted a lowering of dopaminergic tone to help decrease U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Azilect, INN-Rasagiline
    SCIENTIFIC DISCUSSION 1. Introduction AZILECT is indicated for the treatment of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease (PD) as monotherapy (without levodopa) or as adjunct therapy (with levodopa) in patients with end of dose fluctuations. Rasagiline is administered orally, at a dose of 1 mg once daily with or without levodopa. Parkinson’s disease is a common neurodegenerative disorder typified by loss of dopaminergic neurones from the basal ganglia, and by a characteristic clinical syndrome with cardinal physical signs of resting tremor, bradikinesia and rigidity. The main treatment aims at alleviating symptoms through a balance of anti-cholinergic and dopaminergic drugs. Parkinson’s disease (PD) treatment is complex due to the progressive nature of the disease, and the array of motor and non-motor features combined with early and late side effects associated with therapeutic interventions. Rasagiline is a chemical inhibitor of the enzyme monoamine oxidase (MAO) type B which has a major role in the inactivation of biogenic and diet-derived amines in the central nervous system. MAO has two isozymes (types A and B) and type B is responsible for metabolising dopamine in the central nervous system; as dopamine deficiency is the main contributing factor to the clinical manifestations of Parkinson’s disease, inhibition of MAO-B should tend to restore dopamine levels towards normal values and this improve the condition. Rasagiline was developed for the symptomatic treatment of Parkinson’s disease both as monotherapy in early disease and as adjunct therapy to levodopa + aminoacids decarboxylase inhibitor (LD + ADI) in patients with motor fluctuations. 2. Quality Introduction Drug Substance • Composition AZILECT contains rasagiline mesylate as the active substance.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence That Formulations of the Selective MAO-B Inhibitor, Selegiline, Which Bypass First-Pass Metabolism, Also Inhibit MAO-A in the Human Brain
    Neuropsychopharmacology (2015) 40, 650–657 OPEN & 2015 American College of Neuropsychopharmacology. All rights reserved 0893-133X/15 www.neuropsychopharmacology.org Evidence that Formulations of the Selective MAO-B Inhibitor, Selegiline, which Bypass First-Pass Metabolism, also Inhibit MAO-A in the Human Brain Joanna S Fowler*,1, Jean Logan2, Nora D Volkow3,4, Elena Shumay4, Fred McCall-Perez5, Millard Jayne4, Gene-Jack Wang4, David L Alexoff1, Karen Apelskog-Torres4, Barbara Hubbard1, Pauline Carter1, 1 6 7 4 1 1 4 Payton King , Stanley Fahn , Michelle Gilmor , Frank Telang , Colleen Shea , Youwen Xu and Lisa Muench 1Biological, Environmental and Climate Sciences Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY, USA; 2New York University Langone Medical Center, Department of Radiology, New York, NY, USA; 3National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 4 5 USA; National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA; Targeted Medical Pharma Inc, 6 7 Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Neurology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ, USA Selegiline (L-deprenyl) is a selective, irreversible inhibitor of monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) at the conventional dose (10 mg/day oral) that is used in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. However, controlled studies have demonstrated antidepressant activity for high doses of oral selegiline and for transdermal selegiline suggesting that when plasma levels of selegiline are elevated, brain MAO-A might also be inhibited. Zydis selegiline (Zelapar) is an orally disintegrating formulation of selegiline, which is absorbed through the buccal mucosa producing higher plasma levels of selegiline and reduced amphetamine metabolites compared with equal doses of conventional selegiline.
    [Show full text]
  • Title 16. Crimes and Offenses Chapter 13. Controlled Substances Article 1
    TITLE 16. CRIMES AND OFFENSES CHAPTER 13. CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES ARTICLE 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS § 16-13-1. Drug related objects (a) As used in this Code section, the term: (1) "Controlled substance" shall have the same meaning as defined in Article 2 of this chapter, relating to controlled substances. For the purposes of this Code section, the term "controlled substance" shall include marijuana as defined by paragraph (16) of Code Section 16-13-21. (2) "Dangerous drug" shall have the same meaning as defined in Article 3 of this chapter, relating to dangerous drugs. (3) "Drug related object" means any machine, instrument, tool, equipment, contrivance, or device which an average person would reasonably conclude is intended to be used for one or more of the following purposes: (A) To introduce into the human body any dangerous drug or controlled substance under circumstances in violation of the laws of this state; (B) To enhance the effect on the human body of any dangerous drug or controlled substance under circumstances in violation of the laws of this state; (C) To conceal any quantity of any dangerous drug or controlled substance under circumstances in violation of the laws of this state; or (D) To test the strength, effectiveness, or purity of any dangerous drug or controlled substance under circumstances in violation of the laws of this state. (4) "Knowingly" means having general knowledge that a machine, instrument, tool, item of equipment, contrivance, or device is a drug related object or having reasonable grounds to believe that any such object is or may, to an average person, appear to be a drug related object.
    [Show full text]
  • Consent for Treatment with Disulfiram
    CONSENT FOR TREATMENT WITH DISULFIRAM • Disulfiram (Antabuse) is a medication that is used to help prevent relapse to alcohol. • The body is not able to process alcohol while taking disulfiram. This includes even very small doses that may be absorbed from perfume, hand sanitizer, food items (dressings, vinegars, marinades, sauces, extracts, etc.) and alcoholic beverages. It is important to check labels of items that will go in or on your body. • Disulfiram should NOT be taken if you have consumed alcohol within the past 12 hours. • A disulfiram-alcohol reaction may include: trouble breathing, throbbing pain in head and neck, nausea, vomiting, sweating, thirst, palpitations, weakness, dizziness, blurred vision, and confusion. Severe reactions may involve respiratory failure, heart failure, unconsciousness, seizure, and death. • The larger the dose of the alcohol, the stronger the disulfiram-alcohol effect. The reaction can last from 30 minutes to several hours, or as long as it takes for the alcohol to be metabolized. • Disulfiram-alcohol reaction may occur for up to 2 weeks after stopping medication. • This medication can affect your liver. Blood will be drawn before starting treatment, again soon after starting treatment, and then as needed to make sure your liver is healthy. Tell your treatment team or seek emergency care if you develop any of these symptoms: o Yellowing of the skin or eyes o Dark urine o White stool or diarrhea o Stomach pain or loss of appetite o More tired than normal • Allergic reactions can happen when taking disulfiram. Alert your treatment team or get immediate medical help if you have any of these symptoms: o Skin rash o Chest pain o Trouble breathing or wheezing o Dizziness or fainting o Swelling of eyes, mouth, tongue, or face • The most common side effect of disulfiram is drowsiness, but severe adverse reactions have occurred in some individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Transition from Acute to Chronic Postsurgical Pain: Risk Factors and Protective Factors
    Review For reprint orders, please contact [email protected] Transition from acute to chronic postsurgical pain: risk factors and protective factors Expert Rev. Neurother. 9(5), 723–744 (2009) Joel Katz† and Most patients who undergo surgery recover uneventfully and resume their normal daily Ze’ev Seltzer activities within weeks. Nevertheless, chronic postsurgical pain develops in an alarming †Author for correspondence proportion of patients. The prevailing approach of focusing on established chronic pain Department of Psychology, implicitly assumes that information generated during the acute injury phase is not important BSB 232, York University, to the subsequent development of chronic pain. However, a rarely appreciated fact is that 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, every chronic pain was once acute. Here, we argue that a focus on the transition from acute ON M3J 1P3, Canada to chronic pain may reveal important cues that will help us to predict who will go on to develop Tel.: +1 416 736 2100 chronic pain and who will not. Unlike other injuries, surgery presents a unique set of ext. 40557 circumstances in which the precise timing of the physical insult and ensuing pain are known Fax: +1 416 736 5814 in advance. This provides an opportunity, before surgery, to identify the risk factors and [email protected] protective factors that predict the course of recovery. In this paper, the epidemiology of chronic postsurgical pain is reviewed. The surgical, psychosocial, socio–environmental and patient- related factors that appear to confer a greater risk of developing chronic postsurgical pain are described. The genetics of chronic postsurgical pain are discussed with emphasis on known polymorphisms in human genes associated with chronic pain, genetic studies of rodent models of pain involving surgical approaches, the importance of developing accurate human chronic postsurgical pain phenotypes and the expected gains for chronic postsurgical pain medicine For personal use only.
    [Show full text]