DOCSLIB.ORG

Study on Soil and Water in a Changing Environment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Study on Soil and Water in a Changing Environment Study on Soil and water in a changing environment Final Report, June 2014 mmmll A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server (http://ec.europa.eu). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2014 ISBN 978-92-79-38794-4 DOI: 10.2779/20608 No of catalogue: KH-02-14-745-EN-N © European Union, 2014 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Soil and water in a changing environment FINAL REPORT European Commission (DG ENV) 27 June 2014 Document information CLIENT European Commission (DG ENV) CONTRACT NUMBER 07.0307/2012/635531/ETU/B.1 REPORT TITLE Final Report PROJECT NAME Soil and water in a changing environment PROJECT TEAM BIO Intelligence Service, HydroLogic PROJECT OFFICERS Mr. Luca Marmo Mr. Thomas Strassburger Ms. Alia Atitar de la Fuente DATE 27 June 2014 AUTHORS Shailendra Mudgal, BIO Intelligence Service Sarah Lockwood, BIO Intelligence Service Helen Ding, BIO Intelligence Service Slavco Velickov, HydroLogic Tom Commandeur, HydroLogic Michael Siek, HydroLogic KEY CONTACTS Shailendra Mudgal [email protected] Or Sarah Lockwood [email protected] ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We are grateful for comments given on an earlier version of the manuscript by Prof. Sjoerd van der Zee (Wageningen University, NL), Dr. Dagmar Haase (Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, DE) and Dr. Csilla Farkas (Research Institute for Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, HU). We would also like to thank Carlo Lavalle, Claudia Baranzelli and Ana Luisa Barbosa from the JRC for providing us with a scenario of reference and relevant datasets for the future projections of the soil water holding capacity. We would also like to thank Sandra Berman for her review of intermediary versions as well as Claire-Marie Gherardi, Amandine De Schaetzen, Isabelle Ma, Guillaume Furet and Elsa Ouvrard for their help in collecting information. 2 | Soil and water in a changing environment DISCLAIMER This report contains the results of research by the authors and is not to be perceived as the opinion of the European Commission. The project team does not accept any liability for any direct or indirect damage resulting from the use of this report or its content. Please cite this publication as: BIO Intelligence Service (2014), Soil and water in a changing environment, Final Report prepared for European Commission (DG ENV), with support from HydroLogic Photo credit: cover @ Per Ola Wiberg ©BIO Intelligence Service 2014 Soil and water in a changing environment | 3 This page is left intentionally blank. 4 | Soil and water in a changing environment Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 11 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 23 GLOSSARY 25 INTRODUCTION 29 CHAPTER 1 “SOIL WATER RETENTION CAPACITY” OR HOW SOILS CAPTURE, STORE AND RELEASE WATER 33 1.1 Soil water retention in the water cycle 33 1.2 Mechanisms of soil water retention 34 1.2.1 Introduction 34 1.2.2 Description of mechanisms 36 1.3 Ecosystem services dependent on soil water retention capacity 38 1.3.1 Provisioning services 40 1.3.2 Regulation services 41 1.3.3 Supporting services 43 1.4 Synthesis 45 CHAPTER 2 PARAMETERS INFLUENCING SOIL WATER RETENTION CAPACITY 47 2.1 Properties of the soil matrix and related parameters 48 2.1.1 Soil structure 48 2.1.2 Soil texture 50 2.1.3 Soil organic matter 51 2.1.4 Soil biodiversity 52 2.2 Soil cover 53 2.2.1 Overview 53 2.2.2 Impacts of different land covers 54 2.3 Soil water content 56 2.4 Climate parameters 57 2.5 Synthesis and discussion 58 CHAPTER 3 KEY DRIVERS INFLUENCING SOIL WATER RETENTION AND IMPACTS ON ASSOCIATED ECOSYSTEM SERVICES 63 3.1 Land use trends 63 Soil and water in a changing environment | 5 3.1.1 Context 63 3.1.2 Land use changes between forests, grassland, arable land and urban areas 64 3.2 Management practices in agriculture, and opportunities for improving soil water retention capacity 73 3.2.1 Farming systems in the EU 73 3.2.2 Choice of plant species 76 3.2.3 Soil management 78 3.2.4 Water management 83 3.2.5 Landscape management 84 3.2.6 Discussion 85 3.3 Urbanisation patterns and opportunities for better SWR capacity 86 3.3.1 Density of development 86 3.3.2 Capacity of infiltration within the cities: green infrastructures, permeable materials and urban drainage capacity 89 3.4 Climate change 91 3.5 Synthesis and discussion 92 CHAPTER 4 TRENDS IN SOIL WATER RETENTION CAPACITY 97 4.1 Trends in the capacity of soil to hold water 98 4.1.1 Trends due to land use changes and agricultural practices 98 4.1.2 Impact of urbanisation 104 4.2 Trends in the risk of SWR related flooding and droughts in a changing climate 108 4.2.1 Risk of flooding (increased runoff) 108 4.2.2 Risk of droughts 112 4.3 Effects of SWR capacity’s evolution on water use 116 4.4 Discussion and Conclusions 118 CHAPTER 5 ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS OF THE DISRUPTION OF SOIL WATER RETENTION CAPACITY 121 5.1 Impacts of floods 122 5.1.1 Arable land 123 5.1.2 Grassland 125 5.1.3 Forest land 126 5.1.4 Urban land 127 5.2 Impacts of droughts 128 5.2.1 Arable land 129 5.2.2 Forest land 131 6 | Soil and water in a changing environment 5.3 Synthesis and discussion 133 CONCLUDING REMARKS 135 REFERENCES 139 ANNEX 1 OVERVIEW OF THE CASE STUDIES INVESTIGATED ANNEX 2 FURTHER ANALYSIS OF SOME PARAMETERS AND DRIVERS OF SOIL WATER RETENTION CAPACITY ANNEX 3 DETAILED METHODOLOGY FOR THE ESTIMATION OF PAST, CURRENT AND FUTURE TRENDS IN SWR ANNEX 4 ESTIMATING ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF CHANGES IN SWR ANNEX 5 EXPERTS’ CONSULTATION Soil and water in a changing environment | 7 List of Tables Table 1: Major parameters governing soil water retention capacity ............................................. 12 Table 2: SWR capacity of different land use types ....................................................................... 13 Table 3: Impact of land cover changes on maximum soil water content ...................................... 14 Table 4: Impact of different farming practices on SWR capacity .................................................. 17 Table 5: Summary of the key parameters influencing SWR capacity ........................................... 60 Table 6: Impact of land use changes on bulk density (BD) and organic carbon (OC) .................... 67 Table 7: Impact of agricultural practices on bulk density (BD) and organic matter (OM) .............. 75 Table 8: Main drivers influencing soil water retention capacity .................................................... 92 Table 9: Estimated economic impacts derived from yield losses during the flood event ............ 124 Table 10: Economic impacts of flood on recreational forest service in selected MS ................... 126 Table 11: Economic damages due to floods in urban areas ........................................................ 128 Table 12: Estimated economic impacts of drought on arable lands ........................................... 130 Table 13: Estimated economic impacts of drought on forest for selected MS ............................ 132 List of Figures Figure 1: The water cycle – water content and residence time ..................................................... 33 Figure 2: Soil water retention in the water cycle .......................................................................... 34 Figure 3: Schematic illustration of soil water retention ................................................................ 34 Figure 4: Dynamics of soil water retention .................................................................................. 35 Figure 5: Four components of soil – example of a typical agricultural soil .................................... 35 Figure 6: Illustration of saturated and unsaturated zones ............................................................ 36 Figure 7: Different states of water in the soil ............................................................................... 38 Figure 8: Ecosystem services provided by soil water retention capacity ...................................... 39 Figure 9: Prague 2002 - overview of flooded city ......................................................................... 42 Figure 10: Access to soil water and rooting depth ........................................................................ 43 Figure 11: Parameters affecting soil water retention capacity ..................................................... 47 8 | Soil and water in a changing environment Figure 12: Key soil dwellers, intervening on SWR capacity as physical and chemical engineers or biological regulators ................................................................................................................ 52 Figure 13: Influence of forest on runoff vs. infiltration .................................................................. 54 Figure 14: Water balance components in built-up areas as a function of sealed surfaces ............. 55 Figure 15: Flash flooding in Malborghetto-Valbruna (Northern Italy) in August 2003 ................... 57 Figure 16: Land cover land use changes for the period 2000-2006 ............................................... 65 Figure 17: Urbanisation trend for the period 2000-2006 .............................................................. 66 Figure 18: Map of flood regulating ecosystem services supply-demand budget for the Etropole area in Bulgaria ............................................................................................................................ 70 Figure 19: Flooded areas in Dresden in 2002 ...............................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Effects of Erosion Control Practices on Nutrient Loss
    Effects of Erosion Control Practices on Nutrient Loss George F. Czapar, University of Illinois John M. Laflen, Iowa State University Gregory F. McIsaac, University of Illinois Dennis P. McKenna, Illinois Department of Agriculture Elements of Soil Erosion Soil erosion by water is the detachment of soil particles by the direct action of raindrops and runoff water, and the transport of these particles by splash and very shallow flowing water to small channels or rills. Detachment of soil particles also occurs in these rills due to the force exerted by the flowing water. When rills join together and form larger channels, they may become gullies. These gullies can be either temporary (ephemeral) or permanent (classical). Non-erodible channels might be grassed waterways, or designed channels that limit flow conditions so that channel erosion does not occur. Gross erosion includes sheet, rill, gully and channel erosion, and is the first step in the process of sediment delivery. Because much eroded sediment is deposited in or near the field of origin, only a fraction of the total eroded soil from an area contributes to sediment yield from a watershed. Sediment delivery is affected by a number of factors including soil properties, proximity to the stream, man made structures-including sediment basins, fences, and culverts, channel density, basin characteristics, land use/land cover, and rainfall-runoff factors. Coarse- textured sediment and sediment from sheet and rill erosion are less likely to reach a stream than fine-grained sediment or sediment from channel erosion. In general, the larger the area, the lower the ratio of sediment yield at the watershed outlet or point of interest to gross erosion in the entire watershed, defined as the sediment delivery ratio (SDR).
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Soil Science W
    Basic Soil Science W. Lee Daniels See http://pubs.ext.vt.edu/430/430-350/430-350_pdf.pdf for more information on basic soils! [email protected]; 540-231-7175 http://www.cses.vt.edu/revegetation/ Well weathered A Horizon -- Topsoil (red, clayey) soil from the Piedmont of Virginia. This soil has formed from B Horizon - Subsoil long term weathering of granite into soil like materials. C Horizon (deeper) Native Forest Soil Leaf litter and roots (> 5 T/Ac/year are “bio- processed” to form humus, which is the dark black material seen in this topsoil layer. In the process, nutrients and energy are released to plant uptake and the higher food chain. These are the “natural soil cycles” that we attempt to manage today. Soil Profiles Soil profiles are two-dimensional slices or exposures of soils like we can view from a road cut or a soil pit. Soil profiles reveal soil horizons, which are fundamental genetic layers, weathered into underlying parent materials, in response to leaching and organic matter decomposition. Fig. 1.12 -- Soils develop horizons due to the combined process of (1) organic matter deposition and decomposition and (2) illuviation of clays, oxides and other mobile compounds downward with the wetting front. In moist environments (e.g. Virginia) free salts (Cl and SO4 ) are leached completely out of the profile, but they accumulate in desert soils. Master Horizons O A • O horizon E • A horizon • E horizon B • B horizon • C horizon C • R horizon R Master Horizons • O horizon o predominantly organic matter (litter and humus) • A horizon o organic carbon accumulation, some removal of clay • E horizon o zone of maximum removal (loss of OC, Fe, Mn, Al, clay…) • B horizon o forms below O, A, and E horizons o zone of maximum accumulation (clay, Fe, Al, CaC03, salts…) o most developed part of subsoil (structure, texture, color) o < 50% rock structure or thin bedding from water deposition Master Horizons • C horizon o little or no pedogenic alteration o unconsolidated parent material or soft bedrock o < 50% soil structure • R horizon o hard, continuous bedrock A vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Physics and Agricultural Production
    Conference reports Soil physics and agricultural production by K. Reichardt* Agricultural production depends very much on the behaviour of field soils in relation to crop production, physical properties of the soil, and mainly on those and to develop effective management practices that related to the soil's water holding and transmission improve and conserve the quality and quantity of capacities. These properties affect the availability of agricultural lands. Emphasis is being given to field- water to crops and may, therefore, be responsible for measured soil-water properties that characterize the crop yields. The knowledge of the physical properties water economy of a field, as well as to those that bear of soil is essential in defining and/or improving soil on the quality of the soil solution within the profile water management practices to achieve optimal and that water which leaches below the reach of plant productivity for each soil/climatic condition. In many roots and eventually into ground and surface waters. The parts of the world, crop production is also severely fundamental principles and processes that govern limited by the high salt content of soils and water. the reactions of water and its solutes within soil profiles •Such soils, classified either as saline or sodic/saline are generally well understood. On the other hand, depending on their alkalinity, are capable of supporting the technology to monitor the behaviour of field soils very little vegetative growth. remains poorly defined primarily because of the heterogeneous nature of the landscape. Note was According to statistics released by the Food and taken of the concept of representative elementary soil Agriculture Organization (FAO), the world population volume in defining soil properties, in making soil physical is expected to double by the year 2000 at its current measurements, and in using physical theory in soil-water rate of growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Soil Compaction: Causes and Management
    October 2010 Agdex 510-1 Agricultural Soil Compaction: Causes and Management oil compaction can be a serious and unnecessary soil aggregates, which has a negative affect on soil S form of soil degradation that can result in increased aggregate structure. soil erosion and decreased crop production. Soil compaction can have a number of negative effects on Compaction of soil is the compression of soil particles into soil quality and crop production including the following: a smaller volume, which reduces the size of pore space available for air and water. Most soils are composed of • causes soil pore spaces to become smaller about 50 per cent solids (sand, silt, clay and organic • reduces water infiltration rate into soil matter) and about 50 per cent pore spaces. • decreases the rate that water will penetrate into the soil root zone and subsoil • increases the potential for surface Compaction concerns water ponding, water runoff, surface soil waterlogging and soil erosion Soil compaction can impair water Soil compaction infiltration into soil, crop emergence, • reduces the ability of a soil to hold root penetration and crop nutrient and can be a serious water and air, which are necessary for water uptake, all of which result in form of soil plant root growth and function depressed crop yield. • reduces crop emergence as a result of soil crusting Human-induced compaction of degradation. • impedes root growth and limits the agricultural soil can be the result of using volume of soil explored by roots tillage equipment during soil cultivation or result from the heavy weight of field equipment. • limits soil exploration by roots and Compacted soils can also be the result of natural soil- decreases the ability of crops to take up nutrients and forming processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Progressive and Regressive Soil Evolution Phases in the Anthropocene
    Progressive and regressive soil evolution phases in the Anthropocene Manon Bajard, Jérôme Poulenard, Pierre Sabatier, Anne-Lise Develle, Charline Giguet- Covex, Jeremy Jacob, Christian Crouzet, Fernand David, Cécile Pignol, Fabien Arnaud Highlights • Lake sediment archives are used to reconstruct past soil evolution. • Erosion is quantified and the sediment geochemistry is compared to current soils. • We observed phases of greater erosion rates than soil formation rates. • These negative soil balance phases are defined as regressive pedogenesis phases. • During the Middle Ages, the erosion of increasingly deep horizons rejuvenated pedogenesis. Abstract Soils have a substantial role in the environment because they provide several ecosystem services such as food supply or carbon storage. Agricultural practices can modify soil properties and soil evolution processes, hence threatening these services. These modifications are poorly studied, and the resilience/adaptation times of soils to disruptions are unknown. Here, we study the evolution of pedogenetic processes and soil evolution phases (progressive or regressive) in response to human-induced erosion from a 4000-year lake sediment sequence (Lake La Thuile, French Alps). Erosion in this small lake catchment in the montane area is quantified from the terrigenous sediments that were trapped in the lake and compared to the soil formation rate. To access this quantification, soil processes evolution are deciphered from soil and sediment geochemistry comparison. Over the last 4000 years, first impacts on soils are recorded at approximately 1600 yr cal. BP, with the erosion of surface horizons exceeding 10 t·km− 2·yr− 1. Increasingly deep horizons were eroded with erosion accentuation during the Higher Middle Ages (1400–850 yr cal.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Soil Erosion? Soil Erosion by Wind Or Water Is the Physical Wearing Away of the Soil Surface
    Do you have a problem with: • Low yields • Time & expense to repair and gullies • Small rills and channels in your fields • Soil deposited at the base of slopes or along fence lines • Sediment in streams, lakes, and reservoirs Soil Erosion May be the Problem! Erosion from cropland What is soil erosion? Soil erosion by wind or water is the physical wearing away of the soil surface. Soil material and nutrients are removed in the process. Why be concerned? • Erosion reduces crop yields • Erosion removes topsoil, reduces soil organic matter, and destroys soil structure Signs of Erosion – Sediment entering river • Erosion decreases rooting depth • Erosion decreases the amount of water, air, and nutrients available to plants • Nutrients and sediment removed by water erosion cause water quality problems and fish kills • Blowing dust from wind erosion can affect human health and create public safety hazards • Increased production costs Erosion removes our richest soil. How much does it cost? • Technical assistance to assess and plan erosion control systems from NRCS is free • No till and mulch till may require special tillage equipment or planters if this equipment is not al- ready available • Vegetative barriers may cost $50-$100 per mile of barrier • Cover crops may cost between $10 and $40 per acre depending on the type of seed used Controlling Soil Erosion Signs of Erosion – Small rills and channels on the soil Dust clouds & “dirt devils” such as the one pictured surface are a sign of water erosion here are signs of wind erosion. How to Reduce Erosion: The key to reducing is erosion is to keep the soil covered as much as possible for both wind and water ero- sion concerns.
    [Show full text]
  • How Do Newly-Amended Biochar Particles Affect Erodibility and Soil Water Movement?—A Small-Scale Experimental Approach
    Article How Do Newly-Amended Biochar Particles Affect Erodibility and Soil Water Movement?—A Small-Scale Experimental Approach Steffen Seitz * , Sandra Teuber , Christian Geißler, Philipp Goebes and Thomas Scholten Department of Geosciences, Soil Science and Geomorphology, University of Tübingen, Rümelinstrasse 19–23, 72070 Tübingen, Germany; [email protected] (S.T.); [email protected] (C.G.); [email protected] (P.G.); [email protected] (T.S.) * Correspondence: steff[email protected]; Tel.: +49-7071-29-77523 Received: 16 July 2020; Accepted: 23 September 2020; Published: 6 October 2020 Abstract: Biochar amendment changes chemical and physical properties of soils and influences soil biota. It is, thus, assumed that it can also affect soil erosion and erosion-related processes. In this study, we investigated how biochar particles instantly change erodibility by rain splash and the initial movement of soil water in a small-scale experiment. Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC)-char and Pyrochar were admixed to two soil substrates. Soil erodibility was determined with Tübingen splash cups under simulated rainfall, soil hydraulic conductivity was calculated from texture and bulk soil density, and soil water retention was measured using the negative and the excess pressure methods. Results showed that the addition of biochar significantly reduced initial soil erosion in coarse sand and silt loam immediately after biochar application. Furthermore, biochar particles were not preferentially removed from the substrate surface, but increasing biochar particle sizes partly showed decreasing erodibility of substrates. Moreover, biochar amendment led to improved hydraulic conductivity and soil water retention, regarding soil erosion control. In conclusion, this study provided evidence that biochar amendments reduce soil degradation by water erosion.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustaining the Pedosphere: Establishing a Framework for Management, Utilzation and Restoration of Soils in Cultured Systems
    Sustaining the Pedosphere: Establishing A Framework for Management, Utilzation and Restoration of Soils in Cultured Systems Eugene F. Kelly Colorado State University Outline •Introduction - Its our Problems – Life in the Fastlane - Ecological Nexus of Food-Water-Energy - Defining the Pedosphere •Framework for Management, Utilization & Restoration - Pedology and Critical Zone Science - Pedology Research Establishing the Range & Variability in Soils - Models for assessing human dimensions in ecosystems •Studies of Regional Importance Systems Approach - System Models for Agricultural Research - Soil Water - The Master Variable - Water Quality, Soil Management and Conservation Strategies •Concluding Remarks and Questions Living in a Sustainable Age or Life in the Fast Lane What do we know ? • There are key drivers across the planet that are forcing us to think and live differently. • The drivers are influencing our supplies of food, energy and water. • Science has helped us identify these drivers and our challenge is to come up with solutions Change has been most rapid over the last 50 years ! • In last 50 years we doubled population • World economy saw 7x increase • Food consumption increased 3x • Water consumption increased 3x • Fuel utilization increased 4x • More change over this period then all human history combined – we are at the inflection point in human history. • Planetary scale resources going away What are the major changes that we might be able to adjust ? • Land Use Change - the world is smaller • Food footprint is larger (40% of land used for Agriculture) • Water Use – 70% for food • Running out of atmosphere – used as as disposal for fossil fuels and other contaminants The Perfect Storm Increased Demand 50% by 2030 Energy Climate Change Demand up Demand up 50% by 2030 30% by 2030 Food Water 2D View of Pedosphere Hierarchal scales involving soil solid-phase components that combine to form horizons, profiles, local and regional landscapes, and the global pedosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Climatic Change on Soil Hydraulic Properties During
    water Article Effects of Climatic Change on Soil Hydraulic Properties during the Last Interglacial Period: Two Case Studies of the Southern Chinese Loess Plateau Tieniu Wu 1,2 , Henry Lin 2, Hailin Zhang 1,*, Fei Ye 1, Yongwu Wang 1, Muxing Liu 1, Jun Yi 1 and Pei Tian 1 1 Key Laboratory for Geographical Process Analysis & Simulation, Hubei Province, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China; [email protected] (T.W.); [email protected] (F.Y.); [email protected] (Y.W.); [email protected] (M.L.); [email protected] (J.Y.); [email protected] (P.T.) 2 Department of Ecosystem Science and Management, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-27-6786-7503 Received: 16 January 2020; Accepted: 10 February 2020; Published: 12 February 2020 Abstract: The hydraulic properties of paleosols on the Chinese Loess Plateau (CLP) are closely related to agricultural production and are indicative of the environmental evolution during geological and pedogenic periods. In this study, two typical intact sequences of the first paleosol layer (S1) on the southern CLP were selected, and soil hydraulic parameters together with basic physical and chemical properties were investigated to reveal the response of soil hydraulic properties to the warm and wet climate conditions. The results show that: (1) the paleoclimate in the southern CLP during the last interglacial period showed a pattern of three warm and
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Carbon Losses Due to Increased Cloudiness in a High Arctic Tundra Watershed (Western Spitsbergen)
    SOIL CARBON LOSSES DUE TO INCREASED CLOUDINESS IN A HIGH ARCTIC TUNDRA WATERSHED (WESTERN SPITSBERGEN) Christoph WŸthrich 1, Ingo Mšller 2 and Dietbert Thannheiser2 1. Department of Geography, University of Basel, Spalenring 145, CH-4055 Basel, Switzerland; e-mail: [email protected]. 2. Department of Geography, University of Hamburg, Bundesstr. 55, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany. Abstract Carbon pool and carbon flux measurements of different habitats were made in the high Arctic coastal tundra of Spitsbergen. The studied catchment was situated on the exposed west coast, where westerly winds produce daily precipitation in form of rain, drizzle and fog. The storage of organic carbon in the catchment of Eidembukta amounts to 5.98 kg C m-2, mainly within the lower horizons of deep soils. Between 5.2 - 23.6 % of the carbon pool is stored in plant material. During the cold and cloudy summer of 1996, net CO2 flux measure- ments showed carbon fluxes from soil to atmosphere even during the brightest hours of the day. We estimate -2 -1 that the coastal tundra of Spitsbergen lost carbon at a rate of 0.581 g C m d predominantly as CO2-C. Carbon loss (7.625 mg C m-2 d-1) as TOC in small tundra rivers accounts only for a small proportion (1.31 %) of the total carbon loss. Introduction tetragona, Betula nana, and Empetrum hermaphroditum might accompany warming on Spitsbergen (WŸthrich, Large terrestrial carbon pools are found in the peat- 1991; Thannheiser, 1994; Elvebakk and Spjelkavik, lands of the boreal and subpolar zones that cover in 1995).
    [Show full text]
  • Global Status, Processes and Trends in Soil Erosion
    Status of the World’s Main Report Soil Resources Chapter 6 Global soil status, processes and trends © FAO | Giuseppe Bizzarri © FAO INTERGOVERNMENTAL TECHNICAL PANEL ON SOILS Disclaimer and copyright Recommended citation: FAO and ITPS. 2015. Status of the World’s Soil Resources (SWSR) – Main Report. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and Intergovernmental Technical Panel on Soils, Rome, Italy The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. ISBN 978-92-5-109004-6 © FAO, 2015 FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO as the source and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s endorsement of users’ views, products or services is not implied in any way.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Erosion
    Soil erosion Soil erosion in sloping agricultural land in Tunisia. Photolibrary on soil erosion processes. The most serious form of soil degradation is from accelerated erosion. Erosion is the washing or blowing away of surface soil, sometimes down to the bedrock. While some erosion takes place without the influence of man, the soil is lost so slowly that it is usually replaced through natural processes of decay and regeneration so soil loss and creation of new soil are balanced. What keeps soil in a natural state from eroding is vegetation. Undisturbed by man, soil is usually covered by a canopy of shrubs and trees, by dead and decaying leaves or by a thick mat of grass. Whatever the vegetation, it protects the soil when the rain falls or the wind blows. The leaves and branches of trees and the cushion of grass absorb the force of raindrops, and root systems of plants hold the soil together. Even in drought, the roots of native grasses, which extend several metres into the ground, help tie down the soil and keep it from blowing away. With its covering of vegetation stripped away, however, soil is as vulnerable to damage as a tortoise without its shell. Whether the plant cover is disturbed by cultivation, grazing, burning, or bulldozing, once the soil is laid bare to the erosive action of wind and water, the slow rate of natural erosion is greatly accelerated. Losses of soil take place much faster than new soil can be created, and a kind of deficit spending begins with the topsoil.
    [Show full text]