Units and Primes
1 / 20 Overview
Evolution of Primality
Norms, Units, and Primes
Factorization as Products of Primes
Units in a Quadratic Field
2 / 20 Rational Integer Primes
Definition A rational integer m is prime if it is not 0 or ±1, and possesses no factors but ±1 and ±m.
3 / 20 Division Property of Rational Primes
Theorem 1.3 Let p, a, b be rational integers. If p is prime and and p | ab, then p | a or p | b.
4 / 20 Gaussian Integer Primes
Definition Let π, α, β be Gaussian integers. We say that prime if it is not 0, not a unit, and if in every factorization π = αβ, one of α or β is a unit. Note A Gaussian integer is a unit if there exists some Gaussian integer η such that η = 1.
5 / 20 Division Property of Gaussian Integer Primes
Theorem 1.7 Let π, α, β be Gaussian integers. If π is prime and π | αβ, then π | α or π | β.
6 / 20 Algebraic Integers
Definition An algebraic number is an algebraic integer if its minimal polynomial over Q has only rational integers as coefficients.
Question How does the notion of primality extend to the algebraic integers?
7 / 20 Algebraic Integer Primes
Let A denote the ring of all algebraic integers, let K = Q(θ) be an algebraic extension, and let R = A ∩ K. Given α, β ∈ R, write α | β when there exists some γ ∈ R with αγ = β. Definition Say that ∈ R is a unit in K when there exists some η ∈ R with η = 1.
Definition Say that α ∈ R is prime in K if α is not zero, not a unit, and whenever α = βγ for some β, γ ∈ R, we have β or γ is a unit.
8 / 20 Warning The norm of an algebraic integer depends on the field in which we consider it. For example, for 3 ∈ Q, we have N(3) = 3. But for 3 ∈ Q(i), we have N(3) = 9.
Norms of Algebraic Integers
Let β ∈ K = Q(θ), where θ is algebraic of degree n over Q.
Let β1, . . . , βn be the conjugates of β for K. Definition The norm of β for K is defined to be
N(β) = β1 ··· βn.
9 / 20 Norms of Algebraic Integers
Let β ∈ K = Q(θ), where θ is algebraic of degree n over Q.
Let β1, . . . , βn be the conjugates of β for K. Definition The norm of β for K is defined to be
N(β) = β1 ··· βn.
Warning The norm of an algebraic integer depends on the field in which we consider it. For example, for 3 ∈ Q, we have N(3) = 3. But for 3 ∈ Q(i), we have N(3) = 9.
10 / 20 Integrality of Norms of Algebraic Integers
Lemma 7.1 Let α be an algebraic integer in K. Then N(α) is a rational integer.
11 / 20 Multiplicativity of Norms of Products of Algebraic Integers
Lemma 7.2 Let α, β be algebraic integers in K. Then
N(αβ) = N(α)N(β).
12 / 20 Characterization of Algebraic Integer Units
Lemma 7.3 Let α be an algebraic integer in K. Then α is a unit in K if and only if N(α) = ±1.
13 / 20 Norms and Primality
Theorem 7.4 Let α be an algebraic integer in K. If N(α) is a rational prime, then α is prime in K.
14 / 20 Algebraic Integers in K can be Factored
Let K = Q(θ) be a fixed algebraic number field.
Theorem 7.5 Every nonzero, nonunit algebraic integer in K can be factored into a product of primes in K.
Corollary 7.6 There are an infinite number of primes in K.
15 / 20 Units in Imaginary Quadratic Fields
Theorem 7.7 √ Let U be the set of units in a quadratic field Q( D) where D is a negative square-free rational integer. (i) If D = −1, then U = {±1, ±i}. √ √ n 1± −3 −1± −3 o (ii) If D = −3, then U = ±1, 2 , 2 . (iii) Otherwise, U = {±1}.
16 / 20 Units in Real Quadratic Fields
Theorem √ Let U be the set of units in a quadratic field Q( D) where D is a positive square-free rational integer. Then there is a unique fundamental unit u > 1 for which U = {±uk : k ∈ Z}.
Note √ √ The fundamental√ unit in√Q( 2) is 1 + 2, and in Q( 3) it is 2 + 3.
17 / 20 √ Determining Small Units in Q( 2)
Lemma 7.8 √ √ There is no unit in Q( 2) between 1 and 1 + 2.
Proof √ √ Suppose FTSOC√ that = x + y 2 is a unit in Q( 2) with 1 < < 1 + 2.
2 2 By Lemma 7.3,√ we have x − 2y = ±1. It follows that −1 < x − y 2 < 1. √ Adding inequalities, we obtain that 0 < 2x < 2 + 2, and infer that x = 1. √ √ But then 1 < 1 + y 2 < 1 + 2, which cannot hold for any rational integer y.
18 / 20 √ Determining All the Units in Q( 2)
Theorem 7.9 √ There are an infinite number of units in Q( 2). They are given by ±λn, where n ∈ Z.
Proof Idea √ Let be a unit in Q( 2). √ Note that since λ = 1 + 2 > 1, the intervals [λk , λk+1) partition the positive real line as k ranges through Z.
n n+1 Hence if > 0, then there is some n ∈ Z with λ ≤√ < λ . We then have λ−n is a unit with 1 ≤ λ−n < 1 + 2, and apply Lemma 7.8 to find that = λn.
For < 0, we apply the argument above to the unit −.
19 / 20 Acknowledgement
Statements of results follow the notation and wording of Pollard and Diamond’s Theory of Algebraic Numbers.
20 / 20