The Mighty River Brahmaputra: Aqua Faunal Diversity Preamble Water

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Mighty River Brahmaputra: Aqua Faunal Diversity Preamble Water The mighty River Brahmaputra: Aqua faunal diversity Preamble Water and soil are identified as the two essential components which support the vary foundation of any civilization. Water is nature’s such gift which supports immense and diversified life forms ranging from tiny micro organisms to large sized animals. Though the open water of lakes and rivers have received man’s attention for activities like navigation, recreation, water supply and fisheries, their ecological values have often been overlooked. Ward (1989) and Boon (1992) forwarded concept of complex relationship between river systems and the fisheries they sustain and also the important processes in large rivers. Aquatic ecosystems, once considered as a neglected ecosystem throughout the globe though it possess more productivity than the terrestrial systems. Now they have been gaining more attention due to their diverse and tremendous economic as well as aesthetic benefits to mankind. Aquatic ecosystems are critical components of the global environment. In addition to being essential contributors to biodiversity and ecological productivity, they also provide a variety of services for human populations. The interaction of geomorphology and hydrological dynamics of an aquatic system is important for the population dynamics. It is equally important for the habitat quality mainly food availability, current velocity, temperature etc. These factors play a vital role in determining the growth and reproductive success of a population. However, aquatic systems have been increasingly threatened, directly and indirectly, by human activities. In addition to the challenges posed by land-use change, environmental pollution, and water diversion, aquatic systems are expected to soon begin experiencing the added stress of global climate change. It is often said that though the first two world wars were for oil but the third world war might be for the water and countries wealth will be compared with respect to aquatic systems only. The hydrological patterns determine the structure and function of most of the aquatic communities. And high diversity of hydraulic conditions offers highest diversity of fauna (Statzner & Higler, 1986). The water current and the geomorphology of the aquatic systems influence the fish diversity of the system. However the quality of edges (bank of the aquatic body) and bed of the aquatic system are also responsible for diversity of fish fauna (Schiemer et al., 1995). It provides shelter for fish as well as other organisms which may further serve as food for fishes. The hydrological significance of tropical water bodies has often been overlooked by acute needs of human requirements such as progressive industrialization, enhanced food production, domestic use and recreation. The contemporary issues like vulnerability, implementation of new fisheries practices, development of land water interface and growing contamination of the limited water resources have raised concern among present day aquatic life scientists (Menon et al. 2000). India is well-known as land of rivers, has a total 14 major rivers each having catchment area of 20,000 km2 and above. Again it has 44 medium rivers with a catchment area between 2000 and 20,000 km2. It also has 53 small rivers each with 2000 km2 or fewer catchment areas which generally originates from coastal mountains (Nath, 1999). Among the major rivers, three (Brahmaputra, Ganga and the Indus river systems) are international in distribution (CBPCWP, 1982). Nevertheless favourable conditions for fish development are linked to biological and physical factors. Location of spawning sites is influenced by bathymetry, substrate type and diversity of adult fish habitats as well as mechanisms conditioning the primary production of the region. However, physical processes (shelf-slope density front and associated current, continental water inflows, winter mixing and stratification of the water column) influence the final distribution patterns of fish eggs and larvae (Alemany et al., 2006; Sabates et al., 2007). As the recruitment success of species depends on physical processes, the management of fish populations cannot be considered independently of their environment (Parsons & Harrison, 2000), and as such, habitat protection is a vital part of ecosystem-based approaches to fisheries management. Though it is assumed that the natural fish stock has drastically depleted and some of the available fish species are rarely encountered over the years are totally missing but sufficient statistics to establish the same is wanting. The literature available concentrates only on the systematic description of the ichthyofauna, but the information regarding associated issues for better understanding of the problem is almost nil. Estimates of the fish production are highly relevant for understanding ecosystem functioning (Elliott & Hemingway, 2002) and as a precursor to ecosystem (energy budget) modeling. They also allow the predicting of potential yields for fishery species (Cowley & Whitfield, 2002). This is particularly important because of the increased focus on both commercial and recreational fisheries in determining whether the current management regime is adequate to ensure long-term sustainability of the aquatic resources. Further information about impact of hydrobiology, increasing rate of deforestation, erosion along with siltation, extensive use of chemicals in the form of pesticide, herbicide and fertilizer, uncontrolled exercise of fishing gears, living standard of the communities mostly depending on the aquatic resources for living on fishery resources are lacking particularly in this region of the globe. The “sustainability” has been the burning issue for all natural resources. The aquatic resources are also under the same fire. The fishery and aquaculture productions are facing the threat of negative growth with positive growth of population to feed and their adverse activities. The fishery and aquaculture sector is striving hard to become sustainable. Considering the scenario of Indian aquaculture sector only, it is now facing a challenge to find out the direction to bring back industries past growth rate to compete in world aquaculture scenario. Importance of a detailed study of the problems and prospects of the river Brahmaputra cannot be ignored for the development of sustainable management strategies. Long term exploitation and suitable, sustainable protection strategies to the aquatic jewels of this river call for the knowledge of aquatic germplasm along with their diversity and present status. The study is a step to add a little bit knowledge to this field to help the decision makers to take appropriate strategy to overcome the problems. Freshwater biodiversity constitutes a vitally important component of the planet, with a species richness that is relatively higher compared to both terrestrial and marine ecosystems (Gleick, 1996). South and Southeast Asia is one of the most speciose areas on the planet containing 20% of all known freshwater vertebrate species and 25% of known aquatic plants (Balian et al, 2008). The Eastern Himalaya region is part of two larger biodiversity hotspots: the Indo-Burma and the Himalaya Hotspots. The high biodiversity of the region is attributed to the recent geological history (the collision of Indian, Chinese and Burmese plates) and the Himalayan orogeny which played an important role in the speciation and evolution of groups inhabiting mountain streams (Kottelat, 1989) The Brahmaputra- Topography, geology and climate The Brahmaputra river system draining from the north slopes of the Central and Eastern Himalaya is one of the very braided rivers of the world, which flows through China (Tibet), India (Arunachal Pradesh and Assam) and Bangladesh (Rao, 1979). The Brahmaputra river system lies between the latitude 230N and 320N and longitude 800E and 97030∕ E. It is the largest river system of Indian sub-continent and comprises 5,80,000 km2 up to its confluence with the Ganga at Gualundo in Bangladesh and thus forms a major part of the Ganga-Brahmaputra-Meghna basin (Phukan, 2006). With the voluminous discharge at the mouth with the flow of 19,830 m3 sec-1 Brahmaputra ranks fourth in the world in terms of average discharge (Goswami, 1985). The Tsangpo river of China, flows through the state of Arunachal, India for 278 km, where it is called Dihang or Siang, The Dihang meets its principal tributaries, the Lohit and the Dibang almost together in the Eastern part of Assam near Kobo in the west of Saikhowa ghat, Assam and from this trijunction the river is known as the Brahmaputra. The Braided River Brahmaputra flows for 640 km through the state of Assam entirely through an alluvial valley. Brahmaputra is not only regarded as a river, it becomes the lifeline for the people residing in its bank. It receives 47 tributaries on its both southern and northern banks. The rier system is the principal water source of Assam and obviously, the principal source of capture fisheries in the state. Needless to say that, the river system is rich in diversity of aqua fauna. Despite of the importance of the river system, there is practically no information about the fauna of Brahmaputra, except fishes of some areas that too not in detail. The Brahmaputra valley is narrow, the average width is only about 80km from foothill to foothill and the river itself occupies 6-9km. The river is considerably fast in Tibet and Arunachal Pradesh, but between Kobo and Dibrugarh the gradient of river is reduced. After Dibrugarh
Recommended publications
  • The Conservation Action Plan the Ganges River Dolphin
    THE CONSERVATION ACTION PLAN FOR THE GANGES RIVER DOLPHIN 2010-2020 National Ganga River Basin Authority Ministry of Environment & Forests Government of India Prepared by R. K. Sinha, S. Behera and B. C. Choudhary 2 MINISTER’S FOREWORD I am pleased to introduce the Conservation Action Plan for the Ganges river dolphin (Platanista gangetica gangetica) in the Ganga river basin. The Gangetic Dolphin is one of the last three surviving river dolphin species and we have declared it India's National Aquatic Animal. Its conservation is crucial to the welfare of the Ganga river ecosystem. Just as the Tiger represents the health of the forest and the Snow Leopard represents the health of the mountainous regions, the presence of the Dolphin in a river system signals its good health and biodiversity. This Plan has several important features that will ensure the existence of healthy populations of the Gangetic dolphin in the Ganga river system. First, this action plan proposes a set of detailed surveys to assess the population of the dolphin and the threats it faces. Second, immediate actions for dolphin conservation, such as the creation of protected areas and the restoration of degraded ecosystems, are detailed. Third, community involvement and the mitigation of human-dolphin conflict are proposed as methods that will ensure the long-term survival of the dolphin in the rivers of India. This Action Plan will aid in their conservation and reduce the threats that the Ganges river dolphin faces today. Finally, I would like to thank Dr. R. K. Sinha , Dr. S. K. Behera and Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • A Wildlife Cruise on the Brahmaputra River
    India - A Wildlife Cruise on the Brahmaputra River Naturetrek Tour Report 6 – 18 November 2014 Report compiled by Sujan Chatterjee Naturetrek Mingledown Barn Wolf's Lane Chawton Alton Hampshire GU34 3HJ England T: +44 (0)1962 733051 F: +44 (0)1962 736426 E: [email protected] W: www.naturetrek.co.uk India - A Wildlife Cruise on the Brahmaputra River Tour Report Tour Leader: Sujan Chatterjee Participants: Jan Cure Margaret Darmody Michael Anderson Rachael Anderson Simon Edlin Val Edlin Peter Hopcraft Andrew Milligan Dave Rogers William Pate Peter Songhurst Anne Songhurst John Thacker Anne Thacker Robin Wright Lesley Wright Day 1 Thursday 6th November In flight Day 2 Friday 7th November The Kolkata Airport welcomed all fifteen of us on arrival (two arrived earlier). The question in everyone’s mind was ‘is there a boat?’ After being assured that she was waiting on the banks of the Brahmaputra, we then drove through the busy office traffic to the tranquillity of the Hyatt Regency Hotel. After some rest, we left at 2pm to visit the Indian Botanic Gardens. On the drive, we got a glimpse of the busy city, a distant view of the Victoria Memorial, the Race course, the Fort William and even the famed Eden Gardens. We reached the Gardens and started off with the massive Banyan tree, which is still growing with the assistance of the government. The birds we saw there included Purple Sunbirds, Bronze-winged Jacanas, Red-breasted Parakeets, Asian Koel, Jungle Babblers, White-throated Kingfishers, Plain Prinia and Greater Coucal. It was warm, and jetlag was catching up, so we returned to our bus at 4.30pm and drove back to our hotel for a well deserved rest.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of Freshwater Fishes in the Eastern Part of Purba Medinipur
    International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Studies 2021; 9(1): 153-158 E-ISSN: 2347-5129 P-ISSN: 2394-0506 (ICV-Poland) Impact Value: 5.62 Diversity of freshwater fishes in the eastern part of (GIF) Impact Factor: 0.549 IJFAS 2021; 9(1): 153-158 Purba Medinipur district of West Bengal © 2021 IJFAS www.fisheriesjournal.com Received: 25-11-2020 Bablu Ali Khan and Basudev Mandal Accepted: 27-12-2020 Bablu Ali Khan DOI: https://doi.org/10.22271/fish.2021.v9.i1b.2399 Centre for Life Sciences, Vidyasagar University, Abstract Midnapore, West Bengal, India Present study emphasis the availability of freshwater fishes in the Kolaghat, Panskura-1, and Sahid matangini block of Purba Medinipur district in West Bengal, India. In this study total of 61 fish species Basudev Mandal were found in the different fish market that is Mecheda Bazar, Siddha Bazar, Sagarbar Bazar of Kolaghat Department of Fishery Sciences, block, Panskura station road market, Chakdaha Bazar, Keshapat Bazar of Panskura-1 block, and Vidyasagar University, Dhalhara Bazar, Kaktia Bazar of Sahid matangini block from January-2020 to March-2020. Among the Midnapore, West Bengal, India species, Cypriniformes were the most leading order of the total fish diversity followed by Perciformes, Siluriformes, Synbranchiformes, Osteoglossiformes, Mugiliformes, Characiformes, and Decapoda. The major groups belongs to according to species abundance Labeo rohita, Labeo bata, Labeo boga, Cirrhinus reba, Labeo calbasu, Catla catla, Cirrhinus mrigala, Hypophthalmicthys molitrix, Hypophthalmicthys
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Freshwater Fish Fauna of West Bengal, India with Suggestions for Conservation of the Threatened and Endemic Species
    OCC SIO L PA ER NO. 263 Records of the Zoolog·cal Survey of India A review of the freshwater fish fauna of West Bengal, India w·th suggestions for · conservation of the threatened­ and endemic species R. P. BARMAN ZOOLOGICAL SURVEY OF IND A OCCASIONAL PAPER NO. 263 RECORDS OF THE ZOOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA A review of the freshwater fish fauna of West Bengal, India with suggestions for conservation i o( the threatened and endemic species R.P.BARMAN Zoological Survey of India, F.P.S. Building, Kolkata-700 016 Edited by the Director, ZoolQ.§iaJl Survey of India, Kolkata ~ Jl'lfif Zoological Survey of India Kolkata CITATION Barman, R. P. 2007. A review of the freshwater fish fauna of West Bengal, India with suggestions for conservation of the threatened and endemic species. Rec. zool. Sllr~'. India, Oce. Paper No~, 263 : 1-48 (Published by the Director, Zoo I. Surv. India, Kolkata) Published: May, 2007 ISBN 978-81-8171-147-2 © Governl11enl of India, 2007 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED • No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the publisher. • This book is sold subject to the condition that it shall not, by way of trade, be lent. re-sold hired out or otherwise disposed of without the publisher's consent, in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published. • The correct price of this publication is the price printed on this page.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment on the Impact of the Tripura Earthquake
    www.gi.sanu.ac.rs, www.doiserbia.nb.rs J. Geogr. Inst. Cvijic. 2021, 71(1), pp. 1–13 Original scientific paper UDC: 911.2:5580.34(540)“2017” https://doi.org/10.2298/IJGI2101001D Received: October 8, 2020 Reviewed: March 15, 2021 Accepted: March 22, 2021 ASSESSMENT ON THE IMPACT OF THE TRIPURA EARTHQUAKE (JANUARY 3, 2017, MW = 5.6) IN NORTHEAST INDIA Jimmi Debbarma1, Jatan Debnath1* 1Tripura University, Department of Geography & Disaster Management, Suryamaninagar, Tripura, India; e-mails: [email protected]; [email protected] Abstract: The northeastern part of the Indian subcontinent, considered as the most active seismic zone of the Indian subcontinent, was hit by an earthquake of Mw 5.6 on January 3, 2017. The epicenter of this earthquake was Kanchanbari located in the Dhalai district of Tripura. The present study aims to assess the environmental and socio-economic impact of this earthquake in the vicinity of the epicenter. To assess and determine the level of damage, the affected areas were visited during the first week of the 2017 earthquake. Various Government offices were also consulted to acquire data on damages caused by the earthquake. Moreover, Remote Sensing and Geographical Information System (RS & GIS) techniques were applied to address the influence of this earthquake on bank erosion. During the field visit, the striking features of soil liquefaction generated by the earthquake were observed in the flood plain area of the Manu River. Landslide, with three casualties in India and the neighbor Bangladesh, and damages of infrastructure were also reported. Additionally, an assessment of the bank erosion study revealed that the rate of the post-earthquake bank erosion increased to 592%, compared to the pre-earthquake bank erosion within the study length of the Manu River.
    [Show full text]
  • National Ganga River Basin Authority (Ngrba)
    NATIONAL GANGA RIVER BASIN AUTHORITY (NGRBA) Public Disclosure Authorized (Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India) Public Disclosure Authorized Environmental and Social Management Framework (ESMF) Public Disclosure Authorized Volume I - Environmental and Social Analysis March 2011 Prepared by Public Disclosure Authorized The Energy and Resources Institute New Delhi i Table of Contents Executive Summary List of Tables ............................................................................................................... iv Chapter 1 National Ganga River Basin Project ....................................................... 6 1.1 Introduction .................................................................................................. 6 1.2 Ganga Clean up Initiatives ........................................................................... 6 1.3 The Ganga River Basin Project.................................................................... 7 1.4 Project Components ..................................................................................... 8 1.4.1.1 Objective ...................................................................................................... 8 1.4.1.2 Sub Component A: NGRBA Operationalization & Program Management 9 1.4.1.3 Sub component B: Technical Assistance for ULB Service Provider .......... 9 1.4.1.4 Sub-component C: Technical Assistance for Environmental Regulator ... 10 1.4.2.1 Objective ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Esox Lucius) Ecological Risk Screening Summary
    Northern Pike (Esox lucius) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, February 2019 Web Version, 8/26/2019 Photo: Ryan Hagerty/USFWS. Public Domain – Government Work. Available: https://digitalmedia.fws.gov/digital/collection/natdiglib/id/26990/rec/22. (February 1, 2019). 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Froese and Pauly (2019a): “Circumpolar in fresh water. North America: Atlantic, Arctic, Pacific, Great Lakes, and Mississippi River basins from Labrador to Alaska and south to Pennsylvania and Nebraska, USA [Page and Burr 2011]. Eurasia: Caspian, Black, Baltic, White, Barents, Arctic, North and Aral Seas and Atlantic basins, southwest to Adour drainage; Mediterranean basin in Rhône drainage and northern Italy. Widely distributed in central Asia and Siberia easward [sic] to Anadyr drainage (Bering Sea basin). Historically absent from Iberian Peninsula, Mediterranean France, central Italy, southern and western Greece, eastern Adriatic basin, Iceland, western Norway and northern Scotland.” Froese and Pauly (2019a) list Esox lucius as native in Armenia, Azerbaijan, China, Georgia, Iran, Kazakhstan, Mongolia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Albania, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Macedonia, Moldova, Monaco, 1 Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, Ukraine, Canada, and the United States (including Alaska). From Froese and Pauly (2019a): “Occurs in Erqishi river and Ulungur lake [in China].” “Known from the Selenge drainage [in Mongolia] [Kottelat 2006].” “[In Turkey:] Known from the European Black Sea watersheds, Anatolian Black Sea watersheds, Central and Western Anatolian lake watersheds, and Gulf watersheds (Firat Nehri, Dicle Nehri).
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S
    Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 4—An Update April 2013 Prepared by: Pam L. Fuller, Amy J. Benson, and Matthew J. Cannister U.S. Geological Survey Southeast Ecological Science Center Gainesville, Florida Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia Cover Photos: Silver Carp, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix – Auburn University Giant Applesnail, Pomacea maculata – David Knott Straightedge Crayfish, Procambarus hayi – U.S. Forest Service i Table of Contents Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................ v List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................ vi INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Overview of Region 4 Introductions Since 2000 ....................................................................................... 1 Format of Species Accounts ...................................................................................................................... 2 Explanation of Maps ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Teleostei: Nemacheilidae)
    21 Ichthyol. Explor. Freshwaters, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 21-30, 7 figs., 1 tab., July 2013 © 2013 by Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil, München, Germany – ISSN 0936-9902 Two new species of Schistura from Myanmar (Teleostei: Nemacheilidae) Jörg Bohlen* and Vendula Šlechtová* Schistura rubrimaculata, new species, is described from two streams on the eastern slope of the Rakhine Range draining in Irrawaddy River. It reaches up to 27.7 mm SL and differs from all other species of Schistura by the presence of a distinct red dot above the midlateral line before the caudal-fin base (not visible in preserved speci- mens), a very slender body and a white ventral side below a broad black midlateral stripe; the dorsal side of the snout dark grey, and the anus located close to the anal-fin origin. Schistura pawensis, new species, shares with S. rubrimaculata the small size, slender body and general pigmentation pattern and is considered as closely re- lated to S. rubrimaculata. Schistura pawensis differs from S. rubrimaculata in having fewer branched rays in caudal and dorsal fins, the anus at mid-distance between pelvic and anal fins, fewer pores in lateral line, the dorsal side of the snout white, and the red dot on the caudal peduncle smaller and less prominent. Introduction Material and methods The loach genus Schistura is widespread across The specimens were either fixed in 4 % formal- South and Southeast Asia and occurs in this area dehyde and later transferred into 70 % ethanol in nearly every stream. Up to now, about 193 for storage (specimens deposited in ZRC and species are considered as valid (Kottelat, 2012), CMK) or fixed and stored in 96 % ethanol (spec- most of them with a restricted area of distribution.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of Fishes Across Hydrological Basins and Elevational Gradients in Eastern Bhutan: a Preliminary Analysis
    Bhutan Journal of Animal Science (BJAS) Volume 5, Issue 1, Page 27-36, 2021 DIVERSITY OF FISHES ACROSS HYDROLOGICAL BASINS AND ELEVATIONAL GRADIENTS IN EASTERN BHUTAN: A PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS CHANGLU*, SANGAY NORBU, KARMA WANGCHUK, GOPAL PRASAD KHANAL, SINGYE TSHERING AND PEMA TSHERING National Research and Development Centre for Riverine and Lake Fisheries, Department of Livestock, Ministry of Agriculture and Forests, Haa, Bhutan. *Author for correspondence: [email protected] Copyright © 2021 Changlu. The original work must be properly cited to permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction of this article in any medium. ABSTRACT: Bhutan’s water resources span a tremendous elevational gradient and are home to a diverse ichthyofauna. However, much of the aquatic biodiversity remains understudied and little is known about the ecology of native species. In an effort to strengthen Bhutan’s existing fishery database, the National Research and Development Centre for Riverine and Lake Fisheries, Haa, conducted an ichthyofauna assessment from 2017 to 2019 at 496 sampling stations spread across three hydrological basins namely Aiechhu, Manas and Nyera-Amachhu in eastern Bhutan. A total of 108 fish species, representing 47 genera, 19 families and seven orders were recorded during the study. The highest number of species and endemic fish were found concentrated along the Aiechhu hydrological basin, particularly the Aiechhu proper (Maochhu) and below <500 meters elevation. Based on these findings, the Aiechhu proper appears to be best choice for retaining a free-flowing river in Bhutan and plans for future hydropower developments in elevation <500 meters above sea level should be reconsidered. Keywords: Aiechhu; Eastern Bhutan; elevation; fish diversity; hydrological basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Protected Areas and Managed Reaches Conserve Threatened Freshwater Fish in Uttarakhand, India
    PARKS www.iucn.org/parks parksjournal.com 2015 Vol 21.1 89 TERRESTRIAL PROTECTED AREAS AND MANAGED REACHES CONSERVE THREATENED FRESHWATER FISH IN UTTARAKHAND, INDIA Nishikant Gupta1*, K. Sivakumar2, Vinod B. Mathur2 and Michael A. Chadwick1 *Corresponding author: [email protected] 1. Department of Geography, King’s College London, UK 2. Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, India ABSTRACT Terrestrial protected areas and river reaches managed by local stakeholders can act as management tools for biodiversity conservation. These areas have the potential to safeguard fish species from stressors such as over-fishing, habitat degradation and fragmentation, and pollution. To test this idea, we conducted an evaluation of the potential for managed and unmanaged river reaches, to conserve threatened freshwater fish species. The evaluation involved sampling fish diversity at 62 sites in major rivers in Uttarakhand, India (Kosi, Ramganga and Khoh rivers) both within protected (i.e. sites within Corbett and Rajaji Tiger Reserves and within managed reaches), and unprotected areas (i.e. sites outside tiger reserves and outside managed reaches). In total, 35 fish species were collected from all sites, including two mahseer (Tor) species. Protected areas had larger individual fish when compared to individuals collected outside of protected areas. Among all sites, lower levels of habitat degradation were found inside protected areas. Non -protected sites showed higher impacts to water quality (mean threat score: 4.3/5.0), illegal fishing (4.3/5.0), diversion of water flows (4.5/5.0), clearing of riparian vegetation (3.8/5.0), and sand and boulder mining (4.0/5.0) than in protected sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Chitala Chitala) Ecological Risk Screening Summary
    Clown Knifefish (Chitala chitala) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, April 2011 Revised, February 2019 Web Version, 10/18/2019 Photo: Michal Klajban. Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0. Available: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ostravsk%C3%A1_ZOO,_chitala_chitala_(5).JPG. (February 2019). 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range Froese and Pauly (2019): “Asia: Indus, Ganges-Brahmaputra and Mahanadi river basins in India. No valid records from Irrawaddy, Salween or other river basins of Myanmar. Reports of Chitala chitala from Thailand and Indo-China were based on Chitala ornata and those from Malaysia and Indonesia on Chitala lopis.” 1 From Chaudhry (2010): “Extant (resident) Bangladesh; India (Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, West Bengal, Tripura, Uttaranchal, Manipur, Assam); Nepal; Pakistan” “Presence Uncertain Cambodia; Indonesia; Malaysia; Myanmar” Status in the United States No wild or established populations of Chitala chitala have been recorded in the United States. No records of trade in C. chitala in the United States were found. Means of Introductions in the United States No wild or established populations of Chitala chitala have been recorded in the United States. Remarks No additional remarks. 2 Biology and Ecology Taxonomic Hierarchy and Taxonomic Standing According to Fricke et al. (2019), Chitala chitala (Hamilton 1822) is the current valid name for this species. It was originally described as Mystus chitala (Hamilton 1822) and has been known previously as Notopterus chitala (Hamilton
    [Show full text]