DOCSLIB.ORG

Home As Work: the First Woman's Rights Claims Concerning Wives' Household Labor, 1850-1880

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Home As Work: the First Woman's Rights Claims Concerning Wives' Household Labor, 1850-1880 Articles Home As Work: The First Woman's Rights Claims Concerning Wives' Household Labor, 1850-1880 Reva B. Siegelt CONTENTS INTRODUCnION .............................................. 1075 I. GENESIS OF A RIGHTS DISCOURSE .............................. 1081 A. The Law of MaritalProperty in the Antebellum Era .............. 1082 B. Women's Household Labor in the Antebellum Era ................ 1086 C. Ideological Sources of Joint Property Advocacy ................. 1091 1. Utopian Communitarianism ............................ 1094 2. Abolitionism and PoliticalAntislavery .................... 1098 t Acting Professor of Law, University of California at Berkeley; Visiting Professor of Law, Yale Law School, 1993-94. B.A., 1978, M.Phil. 1982, J.D. 1986, Yale University. This Article is dedicated to Hannah, Anna, and Eve, as well as to "Pen-Holder" and all the rest of "my ladies," whose voices I have tried to make audible in these pages. I owe deep thanks to the many friends and colleagues who helped me with the manuscript along the way: Hugh Baxter, Mary Becker, Nancy Cott, Ira Ellman, Thomas Ferraro, William Fletcher, Gillian Hadfield, Hendrick Hartog, Herma Hill Kay, Christine Littleton, Kristin Luker, Martha Minow, Andrea Peterson, Robert Post, Derick Schilling, Harry Scheiber, Maijorie Shultz, Joan Williams, and workshop participants at the Yale Law School and the University of Chicago Law School. Special thanks go to Ann Lucas, Rebecca Schleifer, Laura Schlichtmann, and Peggie Smith for their research assistance, to my editor, Jonathan Weissglass, to Kristin Largent-Moyes for all kinds of help with "HAW," and to Boalt Hall and the Center for the Study of Law and Society for financial support so generously provided. 1073 HeinOnline -- 103 Yale L.J. 1073 1993-1994 1074 The Yale Law Journal [Vol. 103: 1073 3. The Roots of "Woman's Rights" in Separate Spheres Ideology ... 1108 II. JOINT PROPERTY ADVOCACY IN THE ANTEBELLUM ERA ................ 1112 A. CriticalPremises of the Joint Property Claim .................. 1113 1. Exposing the Gendered Structure of Property Law ............ 1113 2. Joint Property as a Strategy for Economic Emancipation ....... 1119 B. The New York Campaign: 1850's ........................... 1135 III. JOINT PROPERTY ADVOCACY IN THE POSTBELLUM ERA ................ 1146 A. Shifting Prioritiesof the Postwar Woman's Rights Movement ........ 1147 B. Popularizationand Depoliticization of the Joint Property Claim ..... 1153 1. Dissemination of the Rights Discourse in Postwar Suffrage Journals ............................ 1153 2. Assimilation of Rights Discourse by JournalReadership ........ 1158 3. Postwar Transformations in Joint Property Discourse ......... 1161 C. The Waning of Legislative Advocacy .......................... 1167 1. Postwar Marital Property Reform Efforts .................. 1168 a. Joint Property in Inheritance ....................... 1169 b. Joint Property During Marriage ..................... 1172 c. Abandonment of Joint PropertyAdvocacy .............. 1177 2. Reconsidering the Earnings Statutes in Context: Legislation and Interpretation .......................... 1179 IV. EXPLORING THE MOVEMENT'S RETREAT FROM JOINT PROPERTY ADVOCACY 1189 A. A New Concept of Marital Equality: "Two-Career Marriage"......... 1191 B. A New Perspective on Women' Household Labor: Cooperative Housekeeping ................................. 1198 C. Shaw v. Gilman: Debating a Now-Bankrupt Tradition ............. 1205 CODA: REFLECTIONS AT THE CROSSROADS OF HISTORY AND THEORY ........ 1211 CONCLUSION ................................................ 1215 HeinOnline -- 103 Yale L.J. 1074 1993-1994 1994] Home As Work 1075 INTRODUCTION The law is wholly masculine: it is created and executed by our type or class of the man nature. The framers of all legal compacts are thus restricted to the masculine stand-point of observation-to the thoughts, feelings, and biases of men. The law, then, could give us no representation as women, and therefore, no impartial justice, even if the present law-makers were honestly intent upon this; for we can be represented only by our peers. It is to be expected, then, under the present administration,that woman should be the legal subject of man, legally reduced to pecuniary dependence upon him .... Antoinette Brown [Blackwell], 1852' When the American feminist movement is discussed in legal circles, conversation often proceeds as if women first organized to seek equality during our lifetimes. But it was in the years before the Civil War that a "woman's rights' '2 movement first demanded equality at law. Those who do acknowledge the existence of this early woman's rights movement generally assume that its demands were satisfied long ago, with the reform of marital status law and the amendment of the Constitution to allow women to vote. Yet, as the remarks of Antoinette Brown Blackwell suggest, nineteenth-century feminists raised questions in their time that are still alive in our own.3 This Article examines a nineteenth-century feminist claim that legislatures refused to recognize and historians have since overlooked: the claim that wives were entitled to property rights in their household labor. In exploring the life and demise of this rights discourse, I offer a political history of housework at the dawn of the industrial era, and an account of the earliest feminist politics of women's work. 1. PROCEEDINGS OF THE WOMAN'S RIGHTS CONVENTION, HELD AT SYRACUSE, SEPTEMBER 8TH, 9TH & 10"H, 1852, at 20-21 (Syracuse, J.E. Masters 1852) (emphasis added). 2. During the nineteenth century, the women's rights movement was called the "woman's rights" movement. Throughout this Article, I follow nineteenth-century convention, describing the movement as it described itself. See, e.g., supra note I (report of convention proceedings); infra note 118 (remarks of Lucy Stone). 3. Blackwell may have been one of the first feminists to note that the law reduces women to "pecuniary dependence" on men, but she was not the last. For a striking instance of historical parallelism, compare Blackwell's remarks with those of Robin West 136 years later: By the claim that modem jurisprudence is "masculine," I mean ....that the values, the dangers, and what I have called the "fundamental contradiction" that characterize women's lives are not reflected at any level whatsoever in contracts, torts, constitutional law, or any other field of legal doctrine. *.. The material consequence of this theoretical undervaluation of women's values in the material world is that women are economically impoverished ...Nurturant, intimate labor is neither valued by liberal legalism nor compensated by the market economy. It is not compensated in the home and it is not compensated in the workplace-wherever intimacy is, there is no compensation. Robin West, Jurisprudenceand Gender, 55 U. CHI. L. REV. 1, 58-59 (1988). HeinOnline -- 103 Yale L.J. 1075 1993-1994 1076 The Yale Law Journal [Vol. 103: 1073 I first became involved in this project in the course of studying the nineteenth-century statutes that conferred on married women rights in their earnings. These "earnings statutes," I discovered, did not completely abolish the common law doctrine that made a husband owner of his wife's labor; rather, the earnings statutes gave wives rights only in their labor outside the home, and continued to protect a husband's rights to his wife's services in the home.4 When I pointed this out to colleagues, and suggested that the earnings statutes might be understood as preserving the doctrine of marital service, I was informed that I was analyzing the statutes from an ahistorical vantage point: no one in the nineteenth century would have ever thought to emancipate wives' labor in the family. I set out to determine whether nineteenth-century feminists had anything to say about the question, and discovered that they in fact did. The antebellum woman's rights movement sought to emancipate wives' labor in the household as well as in the market, and to do so, advocated "joint property" laws that would recognize wives' claims to marital assets to which husbands otherwise had title. The movement argued that wives were entitled to joint rights in marital property by reason of the labor they contributed to the family economy.5 Some may find it difficult to imagine that a debate over wives' household labor occurred in the nineteenth century, but our "common sense" intuitions about the normal subjects of political debate were formed in the aftermath of the industrial revolution, rather than at its inception. It was in the years before the Civil War, when a family-based economy was giving way to the industrial system, that feminists first attacked the common law doctrine of marital service and argued that wives were entitled to rights in their household labor. By reconstructing the social universe in which it still could be argued that wives' work was work, and a debate over the legal status of wives' household labor made "common sense," I hope to explain the life of the joint property claim and thus to change our understanding of the evolution of feminism and family law. 4. See Reva Siegel, Of Status and Contract, Marriage and Market: Nineteenth-Century Reform of Coverture: Judicial Construction of the Earnings Statutes (1986) (unpublished manuscript, on file with author). A growing number of historians have observed that the earnings statutes did not apply to the labor most wives performed in the home. See NORMA BASCH, IN THE EYES OF THE LAW: WOMEN, MARRIAGE, AND PROPERTY
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Nineteenth Amendment, Sex Equality, Federalism, and the Family
    VOLUME 115 FEBRUARY 2002 NUMBER 4 HARVARD LAW REVIEW ARTICLE SHE THE PEOPLE: THE NINETEENTH AMENDMENT, SEX EQUALITY, FEDERALISM, AND THE FAMILY Reva B. Siegel TABLE OF CONTENTS IN TRO D UCTIO N ............................................................................................................................... 948 I. THE SEX DISCRIMINATION PARADIGM ............................................................................... 953 II. TOWARD A SYNTHETIC READING OF THE FOURTEENTH AND NINETEENTH AMEND- MENTS: A NEW HISTORICAL FOUNDATION FOR SEX DISCRIMINATION DOCTRINE ....... 96o A. Frontiero's Use of History in Building the Race Analogy ................................................ 961 B. Analogical and Synthetic Interpretation:A New Role for History in Sex Discrim inationD octrine..................................................................................................... 965 C. HistoricalTies Between the Fourteenth and Nineteenth Amendments ......................... 968 D. Reading the Suffrage Debates: Some PreliminaryRemarks ........................................... 976 III. VOTING AND THE FAM ILY ...................................................................................................... 977 A. Virtual Representation:Male Household Headship in Public and Private Law .......... 981 B. "Self-Government": The Woman Suffrage Rejoinder....................................................... 987 C. The Surrejoinder:Marital Unity Arguments Against Woman Suffrage ......................... 993 IV. OF FAMILIES,
    [Show full text]
  • From Hostess to Political Surrogate: the Evolving Role of the First Lady of the United States
    Cultural and Religious Studies, ISSN 2328-2177 March 2014, Vol. 2, No. 3, 181-193 D DAVID PUBLISHING From Hostess to Political Surrogate: The Evolving Role of the First Lady of the United States Allison R. Levin, Esq Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, USA This paper investigates the evolution of the role of the first lady of the United States, which is of particular interest because of its non-constitutional and non-formal nature that has become one of the most prominent and visible non-paid positions in the world. The first lady’s responsibility has evolved from serving as a social hostess and a ceremonial presence at the side of the President, to serving as a spokeswoman for the country. More recently, in addition to her other duties, the first lady has acted as a political surrogate for the President. This study conducts a social movement rhetorical analysis, using the technique of discourse tracing, to examine how and why the culture of the office of the first lady has evolved. Finally, this study will add current political culture scholarship by investigating issues surrounding the 2016 presidential election. Keywords: politics, first Ladies, organizational culture, elections Introduction Prior to 1933 and the election of Franklin Roosevelt, the first lady was a non-essential member of the White House. The spouse of the President did not even have an official name or position for many years. These women were expected to fill traditional wifely roles including supporting their husbands, hosting parties, and being ready to make the President look good to the public.
    [Show full text]
  • The Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism: Towards a More
    THE UNHAPPY MARRIAGE OF MARXISM AND FEMINISM TOWARDS A MORE PROGRESSIVE UNION Heidi I . Hartmann This paper argues that the relation between marxism and feminism has, in all the forms it has so far taken, been an unequal one . While both marxist method and feminist analysis are necessary to an understanding of capi- talist societies, and of the position of women within them, in fact femi- nism has consistently been subordinated . The paper presents a challenge to both marxist and radical feminist work on the "woman question", and argues that what it is necessary to analyse is the combination of patriarchy and capitalism . It is a paper which, we hope, should stimulate considerable debate . The 'marriage' of marxism and feminism has been like the marriage of husband and wife depicted in English common law : marxism and feminism are one, and that one is marxism (1). Recent attempts to integrate marxism and feminism are unsatisfactory to us as feminists because they subsume the feminist struggle into the 'larger' struggle against capital . To continue our simile further, either we need a healthier marriage or we need a divorce . The inequalities in this marriage, like most social phenomena, are no accident . Many marxists typically argue that feminism is at best less impor- tant than class conflict and at worst divisive of the working class . This political stance produces an analysis that absorbs feminism into the class struggle . Moreover, the analytic power of marxism with respect to capital has obscured its limitations with respect to sexism . We will argue here that while marxist analysis provides essential insight into the laws of historical development, and those of capital in particular, the categories of marxism are sex-blind .
    [Show full text]
  • First Woman Question
    The University of Manchester Research The First Woman Question Document Version Final published version Link to publication record in Manchester Research Explorer Citation for published version (APA): Morse, H. (2017). The First Woman Question: Eve and the Women’s Movement. In Y. Sherwood (Ed.), The Bible and Feminism: Remapping the Field Oxford University Press. Published in: The Bible and Feminism Citing this paper Please note that where the full-text provided on Manchester Research Explorer is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Proof version this may differ from the final Published version. If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Research Explorer are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Takedown policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please refer to the University of Manchester’s Takedown Procedures [http://man.ac.uk/04Y6Bo] or contact [email protected] providing relevant details, so we can investigate your claim. Download date:09. Oct. 2021 The First Woman Question University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship Online The Bible and Feminism: Remapping the Field Yvonne Sherwood Print publication date: 2017 Print ISBN-13: 9780198722618 Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2018 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198722618.001.0001 The First Woman Question Eve and the Women’s Movement Holly Morse DOI:10.1093/oso/9780198722618.003.0004 Abstract and Keywords In this chapter I examine the ways in which female writers and protesters have appropriated the Bible’s first woman in their challenges to female subordination in patriarchal culture, and in their own articulation of what it is to be ‘Woman’.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pioneering Efforts of Wise Women in Medicine and The
    THE PIONEERING EFFORTS OF WISE WOMEN IN MEDICINE AND THE MEDICAL SCIENCES EDITORS Gerald Friedland MD, FRCPE, FRCR Jennifer Tender, MD Leah Dickstein, MD Linda Shortliffe, MD 1 PREFACE A boy and his father are in a terrible car crash. The father is killed and the child suffers head trauma and is taken to the local emergency room for a neurosurgical procedure. The attending neurosurgeon walks into the emergency room and states “I cannot perform the surgery. This is my son.” Who is the neurosurgeon? Forty years ago, this riddle stumped elementary school students, but now children are perplexed by its simplicity and quickly respond “the doctor is his mother.” Although this new generation may not make presumptions about the gender of a physician or consider a woman neurosurgeon to be an anomaly, medicine still needs to undergo major changes before it can be truly egalitarian. When Dr. Gerald Friedland’s wife and daughter became physicians, he became more sensitive to the discrimination faced by women in medicine. He approached Linda Shortliffe, MD (Professor of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine) and asked whether she would be willing to hold the first reported conference to highlight Women in Medicine and the Sciences. She agreed. The conference was held in the Fairchild Auditorium at the Stanford University School of Medicine on March 10, 2000. In 2012 Leah Dickstein, MD contacted Gerald Friedland and informed him that she had a video of the conference. This video was transformed into the back-bone of this book. The chapters have been edited and updated and the lectures translated into written prose.
    [Show full text]
  • The Not-So-Reality Television Show: Consumerism in MTV’S Sorority Life
    The Not-So-Reality Television Show: Consumerism in MTV’s Sorority Life Kyle Dunst Writer’s comment: I originally wrote this piece for an American Studies seminar. The class was about consumption, and it focused on how Americans define themselves through the products they purchase. My professor, Carolyn de la Pena, really encouraged me to pursue my interest in advertising. If it were not for her, UC Davis would have very little in regards to studying marketing. —Kyle Dunst Instructor’s comment:Kyle wrote this paper for my American Studies senior seminar on consumer culture. I encouraged him to combine his interests in marketing with his personal fearlessness in order to put together a somewhat covert final project: to infiltrate the UC Davis- based Sorority Life reality show and discover the role that consumer objects played in creating its “reality.” His findings help us de-code the role of product placement in the genre by revealing the dual nature of branded objects on reality shows. On the one hand, they offset costs through advertising revenues. On the other, they create a materially based drama within the show that ensures conflict and piques viewer interest. The ideas and legwork here were all Kyle; the motivational speeches and background reading were mine. —Carolyn de la Pena, American Studies PRIZED WRITING - 61 KYLE DUNST HAT DO THE OSBOURNES, Road Rules, WWF Making It!, Jack Ass, Cribs, and 12 seasons of Real World have in common? They Ware all examples of reality-MTV. This study analyzes prod- uct placement and advertising in an MTV reality show familiar to many of the students at the University of California, Davis, Sorority Life.
    [Show full text]
  • This Opinion Is Not a Precedent of the TTAB Brothers Franchising
    This Opinion is Not a Precedent of the TTAB Oral Hearing: July 17, 2019 Mailed: September 8, 2020 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____ Trademark Trial and Appeal Board _____ Brothers Franchising & Development, LLC v. Three Brothers Brewing, LLC _____ Opposition No. 91232361 _____ Laura L. Myers, Cynthia A. Moyer and John C. Pickerill of Fredrikson & Byron, P.A., for Brothers Franchising & Development, LLC. Elizabeth S. Skilling and Robert F. Friedman of Harman Claytor Corrigan & Wellman, for Three Brothers Brewing, LLC. _____ Before Cataldo, Taylor and Dunn, Administrative Trademark Judges. Opinion by Taylor, Administrative Trademark Judge: Three Brothers Brewing, LLC (“Applicant”) has filed an application seeking registration on the Principal Register of the standard character mark BROTHERS Opposition No. 91232361 CRAFT BREWING (CRAFT BREWING disclaimed), for “Beer, ale, lager, stout, porter, shandy” in Class 32.1 Brothers Franchising & Development, LLC (“Opposer”) has opposed registration of Applicant’s mark on the ground of likelihood of confusion under Section 2(d) of the Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1052(d), based on its claim of priority and likelihood of confusion with the following registered marks:2 Registration No. Mark Goods/Services 47389633 BROTHERS (standard characters) Bar and restaurant services (Class 43) 40291374 BROTHERS BAR & GRILL Bar and restaurant services (standard characters) (Class 43) [“BAR & GRILL” disclaimed] 26440845 Bar and restaurant services (Class 42) [“EST. 1967” disclaimed] 1 Application Serial No. 86517894 was filed on January 29, 2015, and is based upon Applicant’s bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce under Section 1(b) of the Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Sex Discrimination in the Legal Profession: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives
    Valparaiso University Law Review Volume 39 Number 4 Summer 2005 pp.859-909 Summer 2005 Sex Discrimination in the Legal Profession: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives Audrey Wolfson Latourette Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/vulr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Audrey Wolfson Latourette, Sex Discrimination in the Legal Profession: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives, 39 Val. U. L. Rev. 859 (2005). Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/vulr/vol39/iss4/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Valparaiso University Law School at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Valparaiso University Law Review by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Latourette: Sex Discrimination in the Legal Profession: Historical and Conte SEX DISCRIMINATION IN THE LEGAL PROFESSION: HISTORICAL AND CONTEMPORARY PERSPECTIVES Audrey Wolfson Latourette* I. INTRODUCTION The legal and cultural barriers that confronted nineteenth century American women with respect to obtaining entrance to the legal profession were onerous. In an era in which religious mandates and cultural norms proscribed any role for women other than the proper sphere of mother and wife, and legal obstacles to owning property, voting, and keeping one’s wages existed, the notion that a woman would depart from the sanctity of the home and enter the combative and powerful legal profession was viewed as anathema. The male bastion of jurisprudence overwhelmingly rejected the idea that the weaker, submissive sex could successfully undertake legal training and competently engage in advocacy in a public arena.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to a Microfilm Edition of the Alexander Ramsey Papers and Records
    -~-----', Guide to a Microfilm Edition of The Alexander Ramsey Papers and Records Helen McCann White Minnesota Historical Society . St. Paul . 1974 -------~-~~~~----~! Copyright. 1974 @by the Minnesota Historical Society Library of Congress Catalog Number:74-10395 International Standard Book Number:O-87351-091-7 This pamphlet and the microfilm edition of the Alexander Ramsey Papers and Records which it describes were made possible by a grant of funds from the National Historical Publications Commission to the Minnesota Historical Society. Introduction THE PAPERS AND OFFICIAL RECORDS of Alexander Ramsey are the sixth collection to be microfilmed by the Minnesota Historical Society under a grant of funds from the National Historical Publications Commission. They document the career of a man who may be charac­ terized as a 19th-century urban pioneer par excellence. Ramsey arrived in May, 1849, at the raw settlement of St. Paul in Minne­ sota Territory to assume his duties as its first territorial gov­ ernor. The 33-year-old Pennsylvanian took to the frontier his family, his education, and his political experience and built a good life there. Before he went to Minnesota, Ramsey had attended college for a time, taught school, studied law, and practiced his profession off and on for ten years. His political skills had been acquired in the Pennsylvania legislature and in the U.S. Congress, where he developed a subtlety and sophistication in politics that he used to lead the development of his adopted city and state. Ram­ sey1s papers and records reveal him as a down-to-earth, no-non­ sense man, serving with dignity throughout his career in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Humane Society
    5B414 Measure TItle: RELATING TO COMMERCIAL DOG BREEDERS. Report TItle: Animal Cruelty; Dog Breeders; Licensing; Penalties; Counties Requires specified persons who own, control, or have custody or control of ten or more dogs over age four months with intact sexual organs to meet minimum standards of care to ensure the proper treatment and care of dogs and the dogs' offspring. Prohibits any person from owning or having custody of more than thirty dogs over age of one year with intact sexual organs. Requires specified persons to maintain specific records for each dog for at Description: least three years following the death of the dog or a date on which the person permanently ceased to have possession or control of the dog. Prohibits certain types of dogs in the same enclosure. Establishes penalties. Requires the licensing of dog breeders; authorizes each county to develop license requirements and fees; establishes minimum standards of care; authorizes each county to pursue civil penalties for noncompliant dog breeders. Effective 07/01/50. (SD1) Companion: HB233 Package: CCH Prosecutor Current Referral: JDL, CPN/WAM Introducer(s): KIM (Introduced by request of another party) Sort bJl Status Text Date 1/18/2013 5 Introduced. 1/22/2013 5 Passed First Reading. 1/22/2013 5 Referred to JDL, CPN. The committee(s) on JDL has scheduled a public hearing on 01-30-13 9:30AM in conference 1/25/2013 5 room 016. 1/29/2013 5 Re-Referred to JDL, CPN/WAM. The committee(s) on JDL recommend(s) that the measure qe PASSED, WITH AMENDMENTS.
    [Show full text]
  • Woman Suffrage
    Rare Book Miscellany: WOMAN SUFFRAGE On-Line Only: Catalog # 223 Second Life Books Inc. ABAA- ILAB P.O. Box 242, 55 Quarry Road Lanesborough, MA 01237 413-447-8010 fax: 413-499-1540 Email: [email protected] Rare Book Miscellany: WOMAN SUFFRAGE On-Line Only Catalog # 223 Terms : All books are fully guaranteed and returnable within 7 days of receipt. Massachusetts residents please add 5% sales tax. Postage is additional. Libraries will be billed to their requirements. Deferred billing available upon request. We accept MasterCard, Visa and American Express. ALL ITEMS ARE IN VERY GOOD OR BETTER CONDITION , EXCEPT AS NOTED . Orders may be made by mail, email, phone or fax to: Second Life Books, Inc. P. O. Box 242, 55 Quarry Road Lanesborough, MA. 01237 Phone (413) 447-8010 Fax (413) 499-1540 Email:[email protected] Search all our books at our web site: www.secondlifebooks.com Item 140 1. ALGEO, Sara M. THE STORY OF A SUB PIONEER. Providence: Snow & Farnham, (1925). First Edition. 8vo, 318 pp. Illustrated throughout with 91 half-tones. 1/1000 numbered copies. This is #90, one of the 200 reserved for the author's fellow suffragists. This is an ex-library copy with the bookplate of a MA library. Corners of front and rear blanks cropped. Krichmar 1412. [24699] $125.00 Covers the period 1908-1920: the RI suffrage bill, etc. Algeo was in the RI Woman Suffrage Party and active in the national organizing campaign. This is a first hand account of the suffrage fight by an activist. 2. ALGEO, Sara M.
    [Show full text]
  • Suffrage Organizations Chart.Indd
    U.S. WOMEN’S SUFFRAGE ORGANIZATIONS 1 National Woman Suffrage Association (NWSA), American Woman Suffrage Association (AWSA), 1869 - 1890 1869 - 1890 “The National” “The American” Key Leaders Susan B. Anthony, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Lucretia Lucy Stone, Henry Browne Blackwell, Julia Ward Howe, Mott, Matilda Joslyn Gage, Anna Howard Shaw Mary Livermore, Henry Ward Beecher Key Facts • Headquartered in New York City • Headquartered in Boston • Started The Revolution, a newspaper that focused • Established the Woman’s Journal, a successful on a range of women’s issues, including suffrage suffrage newspaper o Funded by a pro-slavery man, George o Funded by subscriptions Francis Train • Permitted both men and women to be a part of • Men were able to join the organization as organization and leadership members but women controlled the leadership • Considered more moderate • Considered radical and controversial Key Stances & • Against the 15th Amendment • Supported the 15th Amendment and the Republican Strategies • Sought a national amendment guaranteeing Party women’s suffrage • Adopted a state-by-state strategy to win suffrage • Held their conventions in Washington, D.C • Held their conventions in various cities across the • Advocated for women’s right to education and country divorce and for equal pay • Supported traditional social institutions, such as • Argued for the vote to be given to the “educated” marriage and religion • Willing to work with anyone as long as they • Unwilling to work with polygamous women and championed women’s rights and suffrage others considered radical, for fear of alienating the o Leadership allowed Mormon polygamist public women to join the organization • Employed less militant lobbying tactics, such as • Made attempts to vote in various places across the petition drives, testifying before legislatures, and country even though it was considered illegal giving public speeches © Better Days 2020 U.S.
    [Show full text]