THEFT of the NATION the Structure and Operations of Organized

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

THEFT of the NATION the Structure and Operations of Organized THEFT OF THE NATION Criminology Sociology American Studies THEFT OF THE NATION THEFT Th e Structure and Operations of Organized Crime in America Donald R. Cressey With a new introduction by James Finckenauer OF THE NATION Organized crime in America today is not the tough hoodlums familiar to moviegoers and TV watchers. It is more sophisticated, with many college graduates, gifted with organizational genius, all belonging to twenty-four tightly knit “families,” who have corrupted legitimate business and infi ltrated some of the highest levels of The Structure and Operations of local, state, and federal government. Th eir power reaches into Congress, into the executive and judicial branches, police agencies, and labor unions, and into such Organized Crime in America business enterprises as real estate, retail stores, restaurants, hotels, linen-supply houses, and garbage-collection routes. How does organized crime operate? How dangerous is it? What are the Donald R. Cressey implications for American society? How may we cope with it? In answering these questions, Cressey asserts that because organized crime provides illicit goods and services demanded by legitimate society, it has become part of legitimate society. with a new introduction by James Finckenauer Th is fascinating account reveals the parallels: the growth of specialization, “big- business practices” (pooling of capital and reinvestment of profi ts; fringe benefi ts like bail money), and government practices (negotiated settlements and peace treaties, defi ned territories, fair-trade agreements). For too long we have, as a society, concerned ourselves only with superfi cial questions about organized crime. Th eft of the Nation focuses on to a more profound and searching level. Of course, organized crime exists. Cressey not only establishes this fact, but proceeds to explore it rigorously and with penetration. One need not agree with everything Cressey writes to conclude that no one, after the publication of Th eft of the Nation, can be knowledgeable about organized crime without having read this book. About the Authors Th e late Donald R. Cressey was professor of sociology at the University of California, Santa Barbara, and served as organized-crime consultant to the President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice. Educated in Minnesota, Iowa, and Indiana, he was dean of the College of Letters and Science Cressey at Santa Barbara, Professor of Sociology and chairman of the department of anthropology-sociology at UCLA, visiting professor in the Institute of Criminology at Cambridge University, and in the law faculty of the University of Oslo. James Finckenauer is the former editor of Trends in Organized Crime. www.routledge.com THEFT OF THE NATION THEFT TheOF Structure THE and NATIONOperations of Organized Crime in America Donald R. Cressey with a new introduction by James Finckenauer ~~ ~~o~:~~~~~up lONDON AND NEW YORK Originally published in 1969 by Donald P. Cressey. First published 2008 by Transaction Publishers Published 2017 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017, USA Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business Copyright © 2009 by Taylor & Francis. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe. Library of Congress Catalog Number: 2008006864 ISBN: 978-1-4128-0764-7 (pbk) Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Cressey, Donald Ray, 1919- Theft of the nation : the structure and operations of organized crime in america / Donald R. Cressey. p. cm. Originally published: New York : Harper & Row, 1969. With new introd. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-4128-0764-7 1. Organized crime--United States. 2. Mafifia--United States. I. Title. HV6791.C715 2008 364.1’060973--dc22 2008006864 FoR MARTHA, ANN, AND MARY Contents Introduction to the Transaction Edition ix Preface xxiii I Trouble 1 II From Mafia to Cos a N astra 8 III War, Peace, and Peaceful Coexistence 29 IV Educating the Public 54 v Demand, Supply, and Profit 72 VI The Structural Skeleton 109 VII Origins of the Authority Structure 141 VIII The Code 162 IX Some Functions of the Code 186 X Shifting Patterns of Authority and Recruitment 221 XI Corruption ofthe Law-Enforcement and Political 248 Systems XII Search, Destroy, and Appease Notes 325 Glossary 343 Index 357 Introduction: Theft of the Nation by Jim Finckenauer IN THE FALL OF 1963, I was a first-year graduate student studying sociol- ogy and criminology at New York University. Given my interest in the study of crime, I was much taken by the news coverage of the hearings, then be- ing held in Washington, DC, by the Permanent Subcommittee of the Senate Committee on Operations, chaired by Arkansas Senator John L. McClellan. Among the witnesses appearing before the committee were Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy and a small-time hoodlum named Joseph Valachi. Attorney General Kennedy, unlike his predecessors, had given a high prior- ity to combating organized crime from his first days in office. And it was that attention from the very highest levels that helped stimulate the FBI's, until then, somewhat tepid interest in this problem. FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover had consistently denied for years that there was anything like a nationwide criminal cartel known as the mafia operating in the United States. Joseph Valachi, the McClellan committee witness, was the most prominent ofthe newly cultivated FBI informants developed in the early 1960s. It was Valachi, along with other sources, and most especially the critical fruits of the then just recently expanded FBI electronic surveillance (bugs and wire- taps) that not only informed Kennedy's views, but that largely shaped the McClellan hearings, and most importantly the overall picture of organized crime that emerged following those hearings. It was this Valachi-painted and surveillance-derived picture, when combined with what had been learned from the Kefauver Committee hear- ings in the early 1950s, from the investigative follow-up to the aborted Apalachin, NY gathering of organized crime figures in 1957, and from a series of meetings known as the Oyster Bay Conferences in 1965-1966, that pretty much comprised the state-of-the-art knowledge of organized crime at that time. It was also during this period (the mid 1960s) that President Lyndon B. Johnson, who had successfully defeated Republican candidate Barry Gold- water in the 1964 presidential elections, decided to form a national crime commission. Despite having won the election handily, Johnson recognized ix x INTRODUCTION TO THE TRANSACTION EDITION the resonance of the crime issue in the law and order campaign waged by Goldwater. The so-named President's Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice began work in 1965. A task force on organized crime was added to the various task groups of the Commission somewhat later-albeit pretty much as a low budget afterthought. That latter group brought in as one of its consultants, Donald R. Cressey, a professor of sociology at the University of California, Santa Barbara. Cressey's subsequent report for the task force, "The Functions and Struc- ture of Criminal Syndicates," not only influenced specific recommenda- tions made by the Commission in its 1967 report, but more importantly set out a view of what organized crime in the United States was like that has influenced law enforcement policies and practices, as well as research and writing on organized crime for more than forty years. And it was from his consultant's report that Cressey fashioned Theft of the Nation, first pub- lished in 1969. At that time, I was still a graduate student (finishing a doctorate), but was also working in a research capacity for the New Jersey State Law En- forcement Planning Agency. That agency was one such body created in all states and territories following the recommendations of the aforementioned President's Crime Commission. Among the crime issues facing New Jersey at that time, perhaps not surprisingly, was organized crime. The Newark race riot had occurred only a year or two earlier, and the investigation of that riot led to disclosures about corruption and mob connections. There were also allegations of mob influence in the NJ state legislature. Organized crime was thus a hot topic. So, as part of the background research to help develop a plan for confronting organized crime in New Jersey, I carefully read Theft of the Nation. Although I was naive at that time to fully appreciate Cressey's historical and sociological analyses of the data and information available to him, I found the book to be an impressive piece of research. It was scholarly. It was well-documented. It was persuasive. But then again, I was just a relative neophyte. Now, nearly four decades later, I am at least no longer a neophyte. Whether I am sophisticated enough to judge Cressey's analyses and conclusions will be for others to decide. What is clear to me is that I come to the book with different eyes than I did in 1969. I am honored to introduce this new edition of Theft of the Nation, and given the history just outlined, not just a little bit in awe. INTRODUCTION TO THE TRANSACTION EDITION xi Several Premises My first premise in approaching this task is that anyone who would rewrite history in the context of contemporary developments and thinking should do so only with caution.
Recommended publications
  • The Fraud Triangle and Tax Evasion
    Maurer School of Law: Indiana University Digital Repository @ Maurer Law Articles by Maurer Faculty Faculty Scholarship 2021 The Fraud Triangle and Tax Evasion Leandra Lederman Follow this and additional works at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub Part of the Tax Law Commons A3_LEDERMAN (DO NOT DELETE) 3/26/2021 4:05 PM The Fraud Triangle and Tax Evasion Leandra Lederman* ABSTRACT: The “fraud triangle”—a theory of why people commit fraud —is the preeminent framework for analyzing fraud in the accounting literature. It developed out of studies of fraudsters, including inmates convicted of embezzlement. The three components of the fraud triangle are (1) an incentive or pressure (usually financial); (2) opportunity; and (3) rationalization. There is a separate, extensive legal literature on tax compliance and evasion. The fraud triangle is largely absent from this legal literature, although tax evasion is a type of fraud. This Article rectifies that oversight, analyzing how using the fraud triangle as a lens can inform the legal literature on tax compliance. In addition, the Article argues that the fraud triangle can provide a conceptual frame that provides a place for two distinct types of tax compliance theories discussed in the legal literature: the traditional deterrence model and certain behavioral theories. I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................... 1154 II. THE FRAUD TRIANGLE ................................................................ 1156 A. THE FRAUD TRIANGLE’S EMBEZZLEMENT ORIGINS .................. 1156 1. Donald Cressey’s Work on Embezzlement ................ 1158 2. Critiques of Cressey’s Work, and Subsequent Studies of Embezzlement ........................................... 1162 B. “FUN WHILE IT LASTED”: THE ROLE OF EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING ............................................................................. 1166 III. MISCONCEPTIONS ABOUT THE FRAUD TRIANGLE ......................
    [Show full text]
  • Sec. 1 Criminology Pages # Quest. I. Understanding Human Behavior ………………
    Sec. 1 Criminology Pages # Quest. I. Understanding Human Behavior ………………. 2 9 II. Theories of Crime Causation... ……………..….. 4 18 III. White collar Crime ...……………….…………. ...9 18 IV. Organizational Crime ……………..…….……... 14 24 V. Occupational Crime ..…………………….......... .21 20 VI. Responsibility for Fraud Prevention...……….... 27 9 VII. Corporate Sentencing Guidelines ………........... 30 20 VIII. Fraud Prevention Policy .. ….………..………... .35 16 IX. Punishment ……....…………….……………......40 13 X. Criminal Justice System ……...………….....…...44 22 XI. Ethics for Fraud Examiners …...…...……...…...51 29 XII. ACFE Code of Ethics ………...…………….…...59 27 ______________________________________________________________________________ Sec. 1 - Criminology 0 / 66 I. Understanding Human Behavior_____________________________________ 1. Incentives programs and task-related bonuses are reinforcement strategies that can be successfully utilized in the workplace. A. True B. False When managers are faced with disgruntled employees, they can modify these emotional circumstances, not just with "image" work, but with adequate compensation and by recognizing workers' accomplishments. Incentives programs and task-related bonuses follow this principle, assuming that employees who feel challenged and rewarded by their jobs will produce more work at a higher quality, and are less likely to violate the law. 2. Criminological research has generally concluded that punishing a person for a crime helps deter that person from committing other crimes in the future. A. True B. False Behavioral studies, such as those conducted by Skinner, show that punishment is the least effective method of changing behavior. Punishing brings "a temporary suppression of the behavior," but only with constant supervision and application. In repeated experiments, Skinner found that punishment-either applying a negative stimulus, or taking away a positive one-effectively extinguished a subject's behavior, but that the behavior returned "when the punishment was discontinued and eventually all responses came out" again.
    [Show full text]
  • PROCEEDINGS of the ACADEMIC WORKSHOP -J
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file, please contact us at NCJRS.gov. PROCEEDINGS of the ACADEMIC WORKSHOP "Definitional Dilemma: Can and Should There Be a Universal Definition of White Collar Crime?" -j 'II June 20-22 1996 Sponsored and Co-hosted by ~~ National White Collar Crime Center t~~1 and West Virginia University ~:*~~ PROCEEDINGS of the ACADEMIC WORKSHOP "Definitional Dilemma: Can and Should There Be a Universal Definition of White Collar Crime?. ~ii~i~,::,,,~ii!iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii!! '~ @ O O O ® O @ Edited by James Helmkamp, Richard Ball and Kitty Townsend National White Collar Crime Center Training and Research Institute Morgantown, West Virginia prr.National Criminal Justice Reference Service - :' GOOO Rock~,il{e,k'iO 20850 © 1996 National White Collar Crime Center Training and Research Institute 11 Commerce Drive, Suite 200 Morgantown, West Virginia 26505 Permission is hereby given for this text to be reproduced, with proper attribution, by non-profit and public agencies engaged in research and training for criminal justice personnel. No resale or commercial use may be made of this document. Printed in the United States of America October, 1996 This project was supported by Grant No. 96-WC-CX-001 as awarded by the Bureau of Justice Assistance with the U.S. Office of Justice Programs. The opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the presenters and discussants and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National White Collar Crime Center or the U.S. Department of Justice. gi~il ~M~++ I ..................... 1"''1+:+ . , P(oo • '1"!. ..... , • i.. + ~ -.] .... :.. ~!;u.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 8 a Brief History of the Underworld and Organized Crime, C. 1750–1950 Introduction
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Leeds Beckett Repository Chapter 8 A Brief History of the Underworld and Organized Crime, c. 1750–1950 Heather Shore Introduction In 1969, the American penologist and criminologist Donald R. Cressey invented an organized crime model for a modern audience (2008 [1969]). Two years before, he had been a consultant on organized crime for the President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice convened by Lyndon Johnson to address the threat of organized crime in the United States. Cressey’s research, and his subsequent book, The Theft of the Nation, would inform U.S. government policies on organized crime for the following decades. In the 1960s Cressey spearheaded the movement of criminologists to attempt to formally define what organized crime was (Maltz, 1976). In doing so they looked back to the recent history of those North American cities in which crime groups were understood to have clawed their way into politics, economics, and society. History, and its impact on the present, was central to many of these attempts to define organized crime. As Attorney General Ramsey Clark remarked in an address to the National Emergency Committee of the National Council on Crime and Delinquency in New York in November 1967, “Many find it difficult to believe there is organized crime, but its existence is confirmed by history, experience and reason. It surfaced in the United States in the last decades of the nineteenth century and during the prohibition era” (U.S. Congress 1967, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Sutherland, Edwin H.: Differential Association Theory and Differential Social Organization
    Encyclopedia of Criminological Theory Sutherland, Edwin H.: Differential Association Theory and Differential Social Organization Contributors: Ross L. Matsueda Editors: Francis T. Cullen & Pamela Wilcox Book Title: Encyclopedia of Criminological Theory Chapter Title: "Sutherland, Edwin H.: Differential Association Theory and Differential Social Organization" Pub. Date: 2010 Access Date: September 12, 2014 Publishing Company: SAGE Publications, Inc. City: Thousand Oaks Print ISBN: 9781412959186 Online ISBN: 9781412959193 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412959193.n250 Print pages: 899-907 ©2010 SAGE Publications, Inc. All Rights Reserved. This PDF has been generated from SAGE knowledge. Please note that the pagination of the online version will vary from the pagination of the print book. SAGE ©2010 SAGE Publications, Inc. All Rights Reserved. SAGE knowledge http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412959193.n250 Edwin Sutherland's development of differential association theory in 1947 marked a watershed in criminology. The theory, which dominated the discipline for decades, brought Chicago-style sociology to the forefront of criminology. It is well known that differential association explains individual criminality with a social psychological process of learning crime within interaction with social groups. Less well known is Sutherland's attempt to explain aggregate crime rates across groups and societies. Here, he specified the theory of differential social organization to explain rates of crime with an organizational process that implies group dynamics. This entry reviews Sutherland's theory of differential association, discusses attempts at revision, and assesses the empirical status of the theory. It also examines recent attempts to revisit and elaborate the concept of differential social organization as well as current areas of research in which it is being used.
    [Show full text]
  • White Collar Crime: the Proble:M and the Federal Response
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file, please contact us at NCJRS.gov. 95th congress} COMMITTEE PRINT 2d Session { No. 16 WHITE COLLAR CRIME: THE PROBLE:M AND THE FEDERAL RESPONSE SUBCOMMITTEE ON CRIME OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES NINETY-FIFTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION JUNE 1978 or the use of the Committee on the Judiciary S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICID W ASIIINGTON : 1018 COMMI'ITEE ON THE JUDIOIARY PETER W. RODINO, JR., New Jetsey, Ohalrnl(1I" JACK BROOKS, Texas ROBERT McCLORY, Illinois ROBERT W. KASTENMllJIER, Wisconsin TOM RAILSBACK, Illinois DON EDWARDS, California CHARLES :m. WIGGINS, California JOHN CONYERS, JR., Michigan HAMILTON FISH, JR., New York JOSHUA EILBERG, Pennsylvania M. CALDWELL BUTLER, Virginia WALTER FLOWERS, Alabama WILLIAM S. COHEN, Maine JAMES R, MANN, South Carolina - CARLOS J. MOORHEAD, California JOHN F. SEIBERLING, Ohio JOHN M. ASHBROOK, Ohio GEORGE E. DANIELSON, California HENRY J. HYDE, Illinois ROBERT F. DRINAN, Massachusetts THOMAS N. KINDNESS. Ohio BARBARA JORDAN, Texas HAROLD S. SAWYER, Michigan ELIZABETH HOLTZMAN, New YGrk ROMANO L. M.A.ZZOLI. Kentucky WILLIAM J. HUGHES, New Jersey SAM B. HALu, JR., Texas LAMAR GUDGER, North Carolina HAROLD L. VOLKMER, Missouri HERBERT E. HARRIS II, Virginia JIM SANTINI, Nevada AuLEN E. ERTEL, Pennsylvania BILLY LEE EVANS, Georgia ANTHONY C. BEILENSON. California ALAN A. PAP'l{ER, General OouII3el GARNER J. CLINE, Staff Dlrectol' J!'RANKLIN G. POLK, ASBoclate Ooun8cl SUBCOMMITTEE ON CRIME JOHN CONYERS, JR., Michigan, Ohairman ELIZABETH HOLTZMAN, New York JOHN M. ASHBROOK, Ohio LAMAR GUDGER, North CarOlina TOllf RAILSBA.CK, Illinois HAROLD L. VOLKMER, Missouri ALLEN E.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fraud Triangle and Tax Evasion
    The Fraud Triangle and Tax Evasion Leandra Lederman Research Paper Number 398 Working Paper (2019) This paper can be downloaded without charge from the Social Science Research Network electronic library at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=3339558 Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3339558 Preliminary Draft The Fraud Triangle and Tax Evasion Leandra Lederman* ABSTRACT The “fraud triangle” is the preeminent framework for analyzing fraud in the accounting literature. It is a theory of why some people commit fraud, developed out of studies of individuals, including inmates convicted of criminal trust violations. The three components of the fraud triangle are generally considered to be (1) an incentive or pressure (usually financial), (2) opportunity, and (3) rationalization. There is a separate, extensive legal literature on tax compliance and evasion. Yet the fraud triangle is largely absent from this legal literature, although tax evasion is a type of fraud. This article rectifies that oversight, analyzing how the fraud triangle—and its expanded version, the “fraud diamond”—can inform the legal literature on tax compliance. The article argues that the fraud triangle can provide a frame that brings together distinct tax compliance theories discussed in the legal literature, the traditional economic (deterrence) model and behavioral theories focusing on such things as social norms or tax morale. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]